DOCSLIB.ORG

Locality Planning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Locality Planning AGENDA ITEM NO: 12 Report To: Inverclyde Alliance Board Date: 11 December 2017 Report By: Aubrey Fawcett Report No: Chair of Programme Board Contact Officer: Miriam McKenna Contact No: 01475 712042 Subject: Locality Planning 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this report is to update the Board on progress being made in the development of the Locality Plans and the locality planning process. 2.0 SUMMARY 2.1 As part of the Community Planning element of the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015, the Inverclyde Alliance has a responsibility to develop locality plans for those areas of Inverclyde which experience the greatest inequalities. Data shows us that those areas are Port Glasgow, Greenock East and Central, and Greenock South and South West. 2.2 The Health and Social Care Partnership also have to work to localities and reconsider their localities and are progressing wellbeing localities of Inverclyde East, West and Central, which the areas listed above slot into as sub-localities, or wellbeing communities. Appendix 1 sets out the different levels of locality focus and Appendix 2 sets out the localities against datazones, which are being used to gather data and target focus. 2.3 Locality Plans were to have been published by 1 October 2017, but due to a number of factors this has not been possible. Part of the delay is the need to ensure that the locality plans are truly driven by communities themselves, and work is ongoing to set up locality groups who can finalise the development of the plans and who can be responsible for delivering them. 2.4 A sub-group of the Community Engagement Network has been meeting to progress how robust engagement can take place with communities, building on the feedback from the Our Place, Our Future community engagement and strategic needs analyses of each of the locality areas. Assets are also being mapped to each area, and communities will be fundamental in ensuring that all the community assets in their area are identified. 2.5 Locality Partnerships will be established in the three wider localities, but there will be a focus on reducing inequalities in each, and specific locality plans can be drawn up for the three sub- localities/wellbeing communities for community planning purposes. There will be 50% representation by communities and 50% public sector partners on the partnerships. 2.6 Robust and effective support is required to ensure the Locality Partnerships are successful, and this will require the input of resources from partners. 2.7 Paragraph 4 explores some of the options for the delivery of Locality Planning in Inverclyde. 1 3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Alliance Board: a. Agrees to support the structure for locality planning in Inverclyde b. Agrees to have officers from each organisation available to attend locality partnership meetings c. Considers how to develop locality planning locally and how this will be resourced, including meeting places, officers and funding d. Identifies which locality partnership it could provide intensive/lead support to. Aubrey Fawcett Chair, Programme Board Chief Executive, Inverclyde Council 2 4.0 BACKGROUND 4.1 Locality Plans require, through the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015, to be developed for those areas in Inverclyde which are experiencing the greatest inequalities. Using data analysis these have been identified as Port Glasgow, Greenock East and Central and Greenock South and South West. 4.2 However, the Health and Social Care Partnership also has to reconsider its localities boundaries. The Public Bodies (Joint Working) (Scotland) Act 2014 sets out that there needs to be a minimum of 2 localities in an area. The HSCP is proposing splitting Inverclyde into three wellbeing localities: Inverclyde East, West and Central. The CPP localities are sub-localities of the HSCP localities. These will be referred to as wellbeing communities. Appendix 1 sets out the different levels of locality focus and Appendix 2 sets out the localities against datazones, which are being used to gather data and target focus. 4.3 Despite the different requirements of the two pieces of legislation, the intention is to take Locality Planning forward together, using the high level localities to bring people together to engage on what is important in local areas in regard to reducing inequalities. Community Planning Locality Plans will be drafted for the sub-localities/wellbeing communities to fulfil the requirement of the Community Empowerment Act, and locality planning will also drive delivery of health and social care services across the localities in East, Central and West. 4.4 Lead officers will be required for each locality partnership and it is hoped that this role will be taken up by community representatives. However they will require to be supported by officers and partners are asked to consider how they might be able to take this role on. There will be support from a community development perspective from variety of different sources in different areas. 4.5 A number of options are currently being explored with regards to obtaining funding that will enable us to progress with carrying out engagement within localities in 2018 and beyond. 4.6 Where there are Community Councils, these will be invited to be involved in the locality partnerships, and other groups will be invited via the Third Sector Interface, Community Learning and Development and other members of the Community Engagement Network e.g. local Tenants’ and Residents’ Associations, local community groups etc. 4.7 It is suggested that partners identify how they will support each locality partnership, particularly if they can take the lead to support community groups and representatives in an intensive way until such time as community representatives feel capable to lead on their own. 4.8 As set out in the Community Empowerment Act, each community planning partner must, in relation to a community planning partnership, contribute such funds, staff and other resources as the community planning partnership considers appropriate – a) With a view to improving, or contributing to an improvement in, the achievement of each local outcome referred to in section 6(2)(a) (the local outcomes improvement plan), and b) For the purpose of securing the participation of community bodies mentioned in section 4(6)(a) (in particular those who represent the interest of persons who experience inequalities of outcome which result from socio-economic disadvantage) in community planning. It is important, if the delivery of the IOIP and locality plans is to make a difference to the inequalities experienced by people living in the communities outlined above, to ensure that community involvement is well supported and resourced. 5.0 NEXT STEPS 5.1 A subgroup of the Community Engagement Network has been meeting to organise events to raise awareness of the locality planning process in order to set up groups for engagement in the new year. This will have to be arranged in such a way as not to clash with Inverclyde Council’s budget 3 engagement, but will involve different methods of engagement. Conversations cafes will be used to set the scene, summarising the information gathered through Our Place Our Future, other engagement processes, the strategic needs analysis of each sub-locality area and asset mapping. 5.2 It will be important to be able to take information to communities to tell them what is already happening around the areas highlighted in the Our Place Our Future engagement (which was reported to the last meeting of this Board) and to address the key issues identified by strategic needs analysis. Partners are asked to provide information on what they are delivering now and plan to deliver over the next three years in response to the key issues. This will allow for informed discussion to take place. It may also allow community groups to identify where they might want to use a Participation Request to influence the development and delivery of services locally. 5.3 The locality partnerships will be responsible for developing an action plan to be delivered by all partners; some actions by communities alone, some by public or third sector partners alone and some joint actions to be delivered by communities and public/third sector partners together. 5.4 In addition to exploring participation request opportunities, locality planning could be used to develop approaches to participatory budgeting (PB). There will be opportunities for partners to pool resources to take forward initiatives, or for individual partners to identify where PB at a locality level might be used to direct service budgets or other resources. 6.0 IMPLICATIONS Legal: none at present Finance: Under the legislation introduced by the Community Empowerment Act each community planning partner must contribute such funds, staff and other resources as the community planning partnership considers appropriate. Human Resources: none at present Equality and Diversity: all effort will be made to ensure that all protected characteristics are represented or factor into the engagement via the locality partnerships. Repopulation: none at present Inequalities: the locality plans will be focused toward reducing inequalities in the locality areas. 7.0 CONSULTATIONS 7.1 The Our Place, Our Future engagement will inform the development of the locality plans, alongside the town centre charrettes and other engagement undertaken by all partners. 8.0 LIST OF BACKGROUND PAPERS 8.1 Our Place Our Future Survey Results, Inverclyde Alliance Board, 2 October 2017
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Government Electors on the Electoral Register, by Council Area and Electoral Ward, 2007 to 2010
    Table 6: Local Government electors on the Electoral Register, by Council area and Electoral Ward, 2007 to 2010 No of 2007 2008 2009 2010 Ward elected Total Total Total Total Council area Code Electoral Ward members Electorate Attainers Electorate Attainers Electorate Attainers Electorate Attainers Aberdeen City 155,666 1,693 156,732 1,577 156,597 1,717 158,087 1,650 0111 Airyhall/ Broomhill/ Garthdee 3 11,842 107 11,729 94 11,534 91 11,631 102 0102 Bridge of Don 4 14,411 168 14,221 162 14,138 195 14,165 190 0101 Dyce/ Bucksburn/ Danestone 4 14,008 134 13,851 130 13,786 129 13,931 141 0108 George St/ Harbour 3 11,154 138 12,081 137 12,420 110 12,396 119 0110 Hazlehead/ Ashley/ Queens Cross 4 13,493 165 13,279 123 13,333 168 13,512 131 0105 Hilton/ Stockethill 3 10,273 78 10,294 49 10,247 67 10,477 89 0113 Kincorth/ Loirston 3 12,043 135 11,949 117 11,848 151 11,926 141 0103 Kingswells/ Sheddocksley 3 10,493 102 10,385 98 10,408 109 10,395 79 0109 Lower Deeside 3 11,019 190 11,109 188 11,140 187 11,324 161 0107 Midstocket/ Rosemount 3 10,514 83 10,755 90 10,991 90 10,949 71 0104 Northfield 3 11,450 110 11,311 119 11,133 143 11,358 149 0106 Tillydrone/ Seaton/ Old Aberdeen 3 11,150 172 12,161 185 12,278 192 12,280 200 0112 Torry/ Ferryhill 4 13,816 111 13,607 85 13,341 85 13,743 77 Aberdeenshire 182,576 2,483 182,790 2,487 182,953 2,401 185,454 2,669 0215 Aboyne, Upper Deeside and Donside 3 8,448 110 8,458 124 8,376 112 8,489 126 0216 Banchory and Mid Deeside 3 8,030 135 8,018 142 8,063 131 8,152 142 0201 Banff and District 3 8,798 97 8,661
    [Show full text]
  • Council Results 2007
    Aberdeen 2007 Elected Councillors Ward 1: Dyce, Bucksburn & Danestone Ron Clark (SLD) Barney Crockett (Lab) Mark McDonald (SNP) George Penny (SLD) Ward 2: Bridge of Don Muriel Jaffrey (SNP) Gordon Leslie (SLD) John Reynolds (SLD) Willie Young (Lab) Ward 3 Kingswells & Sheddocksley Len Ironside (Lab) Peter Stephen (SLD) Wendy Stuart (SNP) Ward 4 Northfield Jackie Dunbar (SNP) Gordon Graham (Lab) Kevin Stewart (SNP) Ward 5 Hilton / Stockethill George Adam (Lab) Neil Fletcher (SLD) Kirsty West (SNP) Ward 6 Tillydrone, Seatonand Old Aberdeen Norman Collie (Lab) Jim Noble (SNP) Richard Robertson (SLD) Ward 7 Midstocket & Rosemount BIll Cormie (SNP) Jenny Laing (Lab) John Porter (Con) Ward 8 George St & Harbour Andrew May (SNP) Jim Hunter (Lab) John Stewart (SLD) Ward 9 Lower Deeside Marie Boulton (Ind) Aileen Malone (SLD) Alan Milne (Con) Ward 10 Hazelhead, Ashley and Queens Cross Jim Farquharson (Con) Martin Grieg (SLD) Jennifer Stewart (SLD) John West (SNP) Ward 11 Airyhall, Broomhill and Garthdee Scott Cassie (SLD) Jill Wisely (Con) Ian Yuill (SLD) Ward 12 Torry & Ferryhill Yvonne Allan (Lab) Irene Cormack (SLD) Alan Donnelly (Con) Jim Kiddie (SNP) Ward 13 Kincorth & Loirston Neil Cooney (Lab) Katherine Dean (SLD) Callum McCaig (SNP) ELECTORATE: 160,500 2003 RESULT: SLD 20: Lab 14: SNP 6: Con 3 Aberdeenshire 2007 Elected Councillors Ward 1 Banff and District John B Cox (Ind) Ian Winton Gray (SNP) Jack Mair (SLD) Ward 2 Troup Mitchell Burnett (SNP) John Duncan (Con) Sydney Mair (Ind) Ward 3 Fraserburgh and District Andy Ritchie (SNP) Ian
    [Show full text]
  • Exam Success for 'A' Students
    www.inverclyde.gov.uk Autumn 2016 1 www.inverclyde.gov.uk Issue 23 Autumn 2016 The Council newspaper for all Inverclyde residents DECADE OF DELIVERY InView looks back at 10 years of Inverclyde Council, centre pages w w w Inverclyde Recruits P1 Scottish Grand Prix New chief of Inverclyde Orchard View 10th anniversary A success Appointed New project see page 3 w w w see page 5 w w w see page 8 w w w see page 10 w w w Exam Success for ‘A’ students Seventeen of Inverclyde’s secondary investment and the dedication of school pupils have been celebrating everyone involved in education.” exam success after scoring top It has been another successful year marks in their Highers. for Inverclyde’s schools Sixteen of the pupils have gained ‘A’ S5 Pupils achieving one or more grades in five subjects with one pupil Highers have again increased to 58.3% gaining A grades in six subjects. (from 52.1% last year) and those Education and Communities achieving three or more Highers to Convener Councillor Terry Loughran 30.5% (from 30%) - the best results in said: “This is an outstanding Inverclyde for over 11 years. achievement by everyone. Well done In S6 there was a greater percentage to each and every one of them for their of young people leaving school with efforts over the past few years. It is no at least one Higher (58.5% compared mean feat to gain A’s in every subject to 57.1% last year), three Highers and I know a lot of hard work has gone (42.8% compared to 38.1% last year), in to these results.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Local Election
    Local authority elections in Scotland Report 3 May 2007 and Analysis The illustration on the cover of this report represents the town hall in Lerwick, Shetland, a building whose imposing features reflect the important role of local councils and local democracy. Its foundations were laid in 1884, the year that the Electoral Reform Society was established. Local authority elections in Scotland Report and 3 May 2007 Analysis Local authority elections in Scotland 3 May 2007 5 Contents Acknowledgements 7 Introduction 9 Summary 11 17 Part 1: What happened in the elections? Chapter 1: The results of 3 May 2007 17 Chapter 2: The political parties and the local elections 29 Chapter 3: Candidate strategy in multi-member wards 51 Chapter 4: Representation of women, young people and minorities 57 65 Part 2: The voters’ experience Chapter 5: More choice for voters 65 Chapter 6: Transferable voting 69 Chapter 7: Did people record valid votes? 83 91 Part 3: Election issues Chapter 8: Ballot design 91 Chapter 9: Multi-member wards 97 107 Part 4: Looking ahead Chapter 10: Looking forward 107 111 Appendix Scotland’s 32 new councils 111 Local authority elections in Scotland 3 May 2007 7 Acknowledgements and Dedication A project of this size is never a one-person job and I would like to thank Ken Ritchie, Amy Rodger and Martin Steven in particular for their constant help, guidance and support. Alasdair Stuart contributed magnificently to the sections on the results council-by-council and equalities. Other colleagues have assisted with the text and gathering data, including Christine McCartney, Gertrud Malmersjo and Hywel Nelson.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Results
    Inverclyde Council Election Results This report contains the election results. Contest Name Ward 2 - Inverclyde East Central I declare that the result of the election in the Ward 2 - Inverclyde East Central is as follows. There are 3 councillor(s) to be elected. The percentage poll was 47.6%. There were 3,690 valid ballot papers and 93 rejected ballot papers. The quota of votes for a candidate to be elected is 923. The first preference votes received by each of the candidates and the stage at which any candidate was elected is as follows: Stage at Which Number of First Candidate Name Affiliation Candidate Has Preference Votes Been Elected Robbie HENDERSON Scottish Liberal Democrats 63 0 IAIN D MACLEOD Scottish Conservative and Unionist 575 0 JIM MACLEOD Scottish National Party (SNP) 1,046 1 Drew MCKENZIE Independent 470 6 Robert MORAN Scottish Labour Party 1,193 1 Donna PICKETT Scottish National Party (SNP) 343 0 Total 3,690 Report Name: ElectionResults_Report_Ward_2_-_Inverclyde_East_Central_05052017_135133.pdf Created: 05-5-2017 13:51:33 Inverclyde Council Election Results This report contains the election results. Of the total ballot papers, the following were rejected and not counted on account of: Adjudication Rejection Reason Number Which does not bear a unique identifying mark in a form that is capable of being read by electronic means 0 On which the figure "1" standing alone is not placed so as to indicate a first preference for some candidate 1 On which the figure "1" standing alone indicating a first preference is set opposite the name of more than one 79 candidate On which anything is written or marked by which the voter can be identified except the printed number and 1 other unique identifying mark on the back Which is unmarked or void for uncertainty 12 Total 93 Returning Officer Signature: _______________________________ Date: _________________ Report Name: ElectionResults_Report_Ward_2_-_Inverclyde_East_Central_05052017_135133.pdf Created: 05-5-2017 13:51:33.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Fire and Rescue Plan for Inverclyde 2014-2017
    LOCAL FIRE AND RESCUE PLAN FOR INVERCLYDE 2014-2017 Working together for a safer Scotland Contents Foreword 1 Introduction 3 Strategic Assessment 4 National Assessment 4 Equality Assessment 5 Local Assessment 6 Local Single Outcome Agreement 6 Our Values 7 Local Operational Assessment 8 Inverclyde Risk Profile 9 Priorities, Actions and Outcomes 11 1. Local Risk Management and Preparedness 11 2. Reduction of Accidental Dwelling Fires 12 3. Reduction in Fire Casualties and Fatalities 13 4. Reduction of Deliberate Fire Setting 14 5. Reduction of Fires in Non Domestic Property 15 6. Reduction in Casualties from Non Fire Emergencies 16 7. Reduction of Unwanted Fire Alarm Signals 17 Achieving Local Outcomes 18 Review 19 Feedback 20 Glossary of Terms 21 Local Fire and Rescue Plan for Inverclyde 2014-17 Foreword Welcome to the Scottish Fire & Rescue Service’s (SFRS) Local Fire and Rescue Plan for the Local Authority Area of Inverclyde. This plan is the mechanism through which the aims of the SFRS’s Strategic Plan 2013 – 2016 are delivered to meet the agreed needs of Inverclyde communities. This Plan sets out the priorities and objectives for the SFRS within Inverclyde for 2014 – 2017 and allows our Local Authority partners to scrutinise the performance outcomes of those priorities. SFRS will continue to work closely with our partners in Inverclyde to ensure we are all “Working Together for a Safer Scotland” through targeting risks to our communities at a local level. The Local Fire and Rescue Plan and its associated action plans are aligned to the Community Planning Partnership structures within Inverclyde.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Council Elections 2007 Results and Statistics
    Scottish Council Elections 2007 Results and Statistics H M Bochel D T Denver University of Lincoln University of Lancaster 2007 Published by Policy Studies Research Centre University of Lincoln Brayford Pool Lincoln LN6 7TS All rights reserved. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission of the publishers. ISBN: 978-1-874474-36-4 H M Bochel and D T Denver 2007 Contents Preface iii Commentary 1 Tabulated Council Results Aberdeen 11 Aberdeenshire 13 Angus 16 Argyll and Bute 17 Clackmannanshire 19 Dumfries and Galloway 20 Dundee 22 East Ayrshire 23 East Dunbartonshire 25 East Lothian 26 East Renfrewshire 27 Edinburgh 28 Falkirk 31 Fife 33 Glasgow 36 Highland 40 Inverclyde 44 Midlothian 45 Moray 46 Na h-Eileanan an Iar 47 North Ayrshire 48 North Lanarkshire 50 Orkney Islands 53 Perth and Kinross 54 Renfrewshire 55 Scottish Borders 57 Shetland Islands 59 South Ayrshire 60 South Lanarkshire 61 Stirling 64 West Dunbartonshire 65 West Lothian 66 Commentary Tables Table 1: Scottish Parliament voting intentions (constituency vote) 2006-7 1 Table 2: Number of candidates in council elections 1999-2007 2 Table 3: Percentage of women candidates and councillors 1999-2007 3 Table 4: Rejected ballots in council elections 1999-2007 4 Table 5: Turnout in council elections 1999-2007 5 Table 6: Share of votes in council
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report 02 the Housing Market Area Framework
    Glasgow and the Clyde Valley Housing Need and Demand Assessment Technical Report 02 The Housing Market Area Framework May 2015 Glasgow and the Clyde Valley Housing Market Partnership Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Building Blocks and Geography 3 Section A – Private Sector 5 3. Analysis of Sasines Data 5 4. Identification of Building Blocks for the Housing Market Area System 6 5. Identification of Housing Market Areas 9 6. Conclusions 11 Section B – Social Rent and Below Market Rent Sector 13 7. Social Rent and Below Market Rent Sector 13 8. Conclusions 13 List of Diagrams Diagram 1 HMA Framework - Building Blocks List of Tables Table 1A Matrix of House-Buying Moves (2007-12) - Initial 25 LA Sub-Areas Table 1B House-Buying Moves (2007-12) - Percentage Self-containment - Initial 25 LA Sub-Areas Table 2A Matrix of House-Buying Moves (2007-12) - Iteration 1 - 15 Areas Table 2B House-Buying Moves (2007-12) - Percentage Self-containment - Iteration 1 - 15 Areas Table 3A Matrix of House-Buying Moves (2007-12) - Iteration 2 - Finalised Building Blocks -13 Areas Table 3B House-Buying Moves (2007-12) Percentage Self-containment - Iteration 2 - Finalised Building Blocks -13 Areas Table 4 Percentage Self-containment in the 13 HMA Building Blocks - Comparison with previous analyses Table 5A 2007-2012 Sasines Percentage self-containment and linkages - Destination -based Table 5B 2007-2012 Sasines Percentage self-containment and linkages - Origin-based Table 5C Identification of pairings where both measures of self-containment increase when areas are
    [Show full text]
  • Renfrewshire Valuation Joint Board
    Renfrewshire Valuation Joint Board Report to: Renfrewshire Valuation Joint Board Meeting on: 18th January 2019 Subject: Electoral Registration Update Report Author: Assessor & Electoral Registration Officer 1.0 Introduction This report is to provide members with an update on the 2018 Electoral Registration Annual Canvass and other electoral issues facing the Board. 2.0 Annual Canvass This process concluded in November 2018 with publication of the Registers taking place on 1st December 2018. The position as at 1st December 2018 is detailed in Table A. 3.0 The Year Ahead 3.1 Refresh of Absent Voter Identifiers This exercise will be carried out this month with mail being issued on 10th January. The correspondence will invite electors with an Absent Voting facility to update their security details. The law dictates that this should be refreshed every 5 years. If updated security details are not supplied, the Absent Voting facility will lapse. The numbers that will be included in the exercise are 2,203. 3.2 Canvassing Business-as-usual Canvassing will commence mid-February 2019 and it is anticipated that approximately 6,500 properties will be door knocked. 3.3 Elections There are no scheduled elections this year however By-Elections can, of course, happen at any time. 3.4 UK Boundary Review The consultation of the 2018 Review of the UK Parliament Constituencies ended mid December 2018. Any proposed changes will be implemented in conjunction with the three constituent authorities. Page 1 of 3 3.5 Polling District Review Returning Officer staff are currently reviewing their polling districts and places which requires to be completed by 31 January 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Commission for Scotland
    2018 Review of UK Parliament Constituencies The Boundary Commission for Scotland 2018 Review of UK Parliament Constituencies Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Scotland pursuant to the Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986 © Crown copyright 2018 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Boundary Commission for Scotland, Thistle House, 91 Haymarket Terrace, Edinburgh EH12 5HD ISBN 978-1-5286-0782-7 CCS0518585236 09/18 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Boundary Commission for Scotland 2018 Review of UK Parliament Constituencies The Secretary of State for Scotland As the Boundary Commission for Scotland, we present our report on the 2018 Review of UK Parliament Constituencies. We have conducted this review under the Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986 (as amended). The Hon. Lord Matthews Mrs Paula Sharp Professor Ailsa Henderson Deputy Chairman Commissioner Commissioner Boundary Commission for Scotland Thistle House 91 Haymarket Terrace EDINBURGH EH12 5HD www.bcomm-scotland.independent.gov.uk September 2018 i Boundary Commission for Scotland 2018 Review of UK Parliament Constituencies Membership of the Commission Our membership during this review has been: Chairman: The Speaker of the House of Commons The Speaker is our ex-officio Chairman, but plays no active role in our work.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the First Periodic Review of Scottish Parliament Boundaries
    Report on the First Periodic Review of Scottish Parliament Boundaries Boundary Commission for Scotland 2010 Boundary commission for scotland a Report on the First Periodic Review of Scottish Parliament Boundaries Submitted to the Secretary of State for Scotland by the Boundary Commission for Scotland pursuant to paragraph 3(3) of Schedule 1 to the Scotland Act 1998. Laid before the Scottish Parliament by the Boundary Commission for Scotland pursuant to paragraph 3(11) of Schedule 1 to the Scotland Act 1998. BCS/2010/1 Presented to Parliament pursuant to paragraph 3(9) of Schedule 1 to the Scotland Act 1998. May 2010 Updated to include corrections to Figure E.15.6, June 2010 Edinburgh: The Stationery Office £35.50 © Crown Copyright 2010 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and other departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. ISBN: 9780108509070 Printed in the UK for The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. 05/10 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. The Secretary of State for Scotland As the Boundary Commission for Scotland, we present our Report on the First Periodic Review of Scottish Parliament Boundaries, as required under Schedule 1 to the Scotland Act 1998, as amended by the Scottish Parliament (Constituencies) Act 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Renfrewshire Valuation Joint Board
    Renfrewshire Valuation Joint Board Report to: Renfrewshire Valuation Joint Board Meeting on: 31st May 2019 Subject: Electoral Registration Update Report Author: Assessor & Electoral Registration Officer 1.0 Introduction This report is to provide members with an update on electoral issues facing the Board. 2.0 This year 2.1 Refresh of Absent Voter Identifiers This exercise was carried out in the early part of this year. This invited electors with an Absent Voting facility to update their security details; the law dictates that this should be refreshed every 5 years. If updated security details are not supplied, the Absent Voting facility will lapse. The numbers included in the exercise were 23,893. At the end of the exercise postal votes were removed from 2,819 electors who did not provide updated security details. A letter is issued to each of these electors explaining the situation and a fresh Absent Vote application form is also provided. 2.2 European Parliamentary Election At the time of writing this report the European Election is a week away, there has been some increase in applications for postal votes and some proxy applications. However, it is not at the same level of increased activity as has been seen with other elections. 2.3 Migration to new Electoral Management System (EMS) The migration process had started in February this year and it was intended to complete the process by end of May. Electoral events have overtaken that timetable and the process is on hold until after the European Elections. It is hoped to be fully transferred to the new system by the start of this years’ canvass which is scheduled to start mid-August.
    [Show full text]