DOCSLIB.ORG

Party Rules, Party Resources and the Politics of Parliamentary Democracies How Parties Organize in the 21St Century

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Party Rules, Party Resources and the Politics of Parliamentary Democracies How Parties Organize in the 21St Century Party rules, party resources and the politics of parliamentary democracies How parties organize in the 21st century Poguntke, T., Scarrow, S. E., Webb, P. D., Allern, E., Aylott, N., Bardi, L., Costa-Lobo, M., Cross, W. P., Deschouwer, K., Eneydi, Z., Fabre, E., Farrell, D., Gauja, A., Kopeký, P., Koole, R., Verge Mestre, T., Müller, W., Pedersen, K., Rahat, G., ... van Haute, E. (2016). Party rules, party resources and the politics of parliamentary democracies How parties organize in the 21st century. Party Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816662493 Published in: Party Politics Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright the author 2016. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:29. Sep. 2021 Party Rules, Party Resources, and the Politics of Parliamentary Democracies: How Parties Organize in the 21st Century1 Thomas Poguntke, Heinrich-Heine University, Germany Susan Scarrow, University of Houston, USA Paul D. Webb, Sussex University, UK and Elin Allern, Nicholas Aylott, Luciano Bardi, Marina Costa-Lobo, William P. Cross, Kris Deschouwer, Zsolt Eneydi, Elodie Fabre, David Farrell, Anika Gauja, Petr Kopeký, Ruud Koole, Tania Verge Mestre, Wolfgang Müller, Karina Pedersen, Gideon Rahat, Aleks Szczerbiak, Emilie van Haute. ABSTRACT This article introduces the first findings of the Political Party Database (PPDB) project, a major survey of party organizations in parliamentary and semi-presidential democracies. The project’s first round of data covers 122 parties in 19 countries. In this paper we describe the scope of the database, then investigate what it tells us about contemporary party organization in these countries, focussing on parties’ resources, structures and internal decision-making. We examine party-family and within country organizational patterns, and where possible we make temporal comparisons with older datasets. Our analyses suggest a remarkable coexistence of uniformity and diversity. In terms of the major organizational resources on which parties can draw, such as members, staff and finance, the new evidence largely confirms the continuation of trends identified in previous research: ie, declining membership, but enhanced financial resources and 1 more paid staff. We also find remarkable uniformity regarding the core architecture of party organizations. At the same time, however, we find substantial variation between countries and party families in terms of their internal processes, with particular regard to how internally democratic they are, and in the forms that this democratization takes. 2 Introduction How do parties organize, and how much do parties’ organizational differences matter? The aim of the Political Party Database Project (PPDB) is to provide systematic answers to the first question so that we can better answer the second one, the crucial “so what?” question about party organizational variations. Other questions we seek to answer are to what extent, and why, do parties retain certain structural features despite changes in their competitive environments? For instance, are some traditional organizational features of parties in parliamentary democracies outmoded, such as party conferences and party membership, merely quaint relics and nostalgic remnants? To use Bagehot’s terminology (1963/1867), have parties’ extra-parliamentary organizations become the “dignified” elements of party constitutions, with the real work of party politics being done by the “efficient” parts of the organization, be these the professionalized party staffs or the party officeholders? Bagehot wrote that the dignified elements were theatrical and often old elements which helped “to excite and preserve the reverence of the population” (61); similarly, some party practices might be remnants of earlier conditions which nevertheless contribute to the legitimacy of party government. Generating legitimacy is not a small thing, as Bagehot himself noted, but is this all that parties voluntary organizations contribute to contemporary politics? Or do parties retain these institutions because they continue to contribute in other ways? We do not expect to find simple or universal answers to any of these questions, but we do expect to gain traction in answering them by using systematic data to test posited relationships. This conviction has inspired the establishment of the PPDB. In the remainder of this article we introduce this database, and present some of our initial findings regarding the state of contemporary party organizations in 19 democracies. I. The Long Tradition of Comparative Party Scholarship: Concepts, Categories and Data The comparative study of political parties’ extra-legislative organizations and activities is more than 150 years old, having arisen alongside the emergence of electoral politics. In the middle 3 third of the 20th century, the comparative study of political parties was stimulated and re-defined by authors who ambitiously constructed new categories and new causal theories to explain organizational differences between political parties in multiple democracies, and to explain changes over time (including Neumann 1954; Duverger 1954; Heidenheimer 1963; Lipset and Rokkan 1967; Kirchheimer 1966; Epstein 1968; Sartori 1976). More recent contributors have continued to develop this approach (cf. Ware 1987; von Beyme 1988; Panebianco 1988; Schlesinger 1994). A common feature of these multi-country studies is their reliance on thick description to buttress their arguments. Some of their most enduring contributions are now- familiar labels (e.g., mass, catch-all, electoral professional, etc.) Much of the theoretical speculation in these classic studies treats parties and party organizations as dependent variables, explaining how contemporary parties bear the marks of their origins, and how organizational differences reflect institutional contexts and ideological (party family) similarities. Echoing more general trends in political science, recent decades have witnessed the rise of more systematic and more quantitative studies of political parties’ organizations and activities outside the legislative arena. Much of this research relies on party statutes and documents for evidence about party structures, sometimes combined with expert judgments about how parties actually work. One notable investigation that combined both approaches was Kenneth Janda’s pioneering study of party organization and practices in 53 countries (1980). Janda and his colleague Robert Harmel later proposed a different framework for collecting and interpreting data about party organizational change, one aimed more squarely at understanding practices in democratic regimes (1994). The 1980s also brought the start of another ambitious effort to gather cross-party and longitudinal data on party organizational development, what became the 12- country Party Organizations: a Data Handbook on Party Organizations in Western Democracies, 1960-90 (Katz and Mair 1992). This effort focused on what the editors dubbed the “official story” approach, primarily reporting published data and formal rules. Data collected in this Handbook have been used for a variety of studies, including ones that update parts of its data (for instance Caul 1999; Poguntke 2000; Bille 2001). 4 II. Introducing the PPDB2 The PPDB project falls squarely within this tradition of evidence-driven approaches to the comparative study of political parties. It deliberately builds on and extends past efforts, while aiming to complement, not duplicate, other contemporary efforts to gather data on elections and representation. Thus, in some cases it replicates questions that have been used in earlier studies, making it easier to use some of PPDB’s snapshot data for longitudinal comparisons. Our dataset also includes match keys to facilitate integration with several other major data sources. In forming what was essentially a data-gathering collaborative endeavour, members of this project agreed to pool their efforts and standardize variables in order to maximize the utility of our individual data gathering efforts. In building our initial team, we deliberately sought out members with varied theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of political parties. This diversity is reflected in the data that we chose to gather. (A full list of those involved in this data collection effort is included in Appendix 2.) We decided early on to focus on the “official story”, in order to facilitate future replication; this decision also constrained our choice of variables.3 We also prioritized gathering data that would be useful for studying parties and their resources as independent variables – in other words, that would help us answer the questions of why and how organizational
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Demanding Less
    Demanding less: why we need a new politics of energy by Rebecca Willis and Nick Eyre Demanding less: About the authors © Green Alliance 2011 why we need a new politics of energy Green Alliance’s work is licensed Rebecca Willis is an under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No by Rebecca Willis and Nick Eyre independent researcher. Her derivative works 3.0 unported work focuses on environmental licence. This does not replace Published by Green Alliance, October 2011 politics and policy making at copyright but gives certain rights without having to ask Green ISBN 978-1-905869-52-7 both a national and local level. Alliance for permission.Under this £5 Rebecca convenes Green licence, our work may be shared Designed by Howdy and printed by Alliance’s Climate Leadership freely. This provides the freedom to copy, distribute and transmit this Park Lane Press Programme for MPs, and advises the Lake work on to others, provided Green District National Park on climate change. In May Alliance is credited as the author Green Alliance 2011 she was appointed as a council member of and text is unaltered. This work must not be resold or used for Green Alliance is a charity and independent think the Natural Environment Research Council. She commercial purposes. These tank focused on ambitious leadership for the writes on issues such as climate change, energy conditions can be waived under environment. We have a track record of over 30 policy, public attitudes to the environment, certain circumstances with the written permission of Green years, working with the most influential leaders government spending and taxation, and the Alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Homes to Be Green: Smart Homes and the Environment Teaching Homes to Be Green: Smart Homes and the Environment by Faye Scott
    teaching homes to be green: smart homes and the environment teaching homes to be green: smart homes and the environment by Faye Scott Published by Green Alliance, November 2007 Designed by Hyperkit and printed by Seacourt © Green Alliance 2007 £5 ISBN 978-1-905869-08-4 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Green Alliance. Within the UK, exceptions are allowed in respect of any fair dealing for the purposes of private research or study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Design and Patents Act, 1988, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of the licenses issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. This report is sold subject to condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, resold, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than in which it was published and without a similar condition including the condition being imposed on a subsequent purchaser. Green Alliance Green Alliance is an independent charity. Our mission is to promote sustainable development by ensuring that environmental solutions are a priority in British politics. We work with representatives from the three main political parties, government, business and the NGO sector to encourage new ideas, facilitate dialogue and develop constructive solutions to environmental challenges. Green Alliance 36 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 0RE tel: 020 7233 7433 fax: 020 7233 9033 email: [email protected] website: www.green-alliance.org.uk Green Alliance is a registered charity number 1045395.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections
    Chapter 1 Green Parties and Elections, 1979–2019 Green parties and elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Wolfgang Rüdig Introduction The history of green parties in Europe is closely intertwined with the history of elections to the European Parliament. When the first direct elections to the European Parliament took place in June 1979, the development of green parties in Europe was still in its infancy. Only in Belgium and the UK had green parties been formed that took part in these elections; but ecological lists, which were the pre- decessors of green parties, competed in other countries. Despite not winning representation, the German Greens were particularly influ- enced by the 1979 European elections. Five years later, most partic- ipating countries had seen the formation of national green parties, and the first Green MEPs from Belgium and Germany were elected. Green parties have been represented continuously in the European Parliament since 1984. Subsequent years saw Greens from many other countries joining their Belgian and German colleagues in the Euro- pean Parliament. European elections continued to be important for party formation in new EU member countries. In the 1980s it was the South European countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), following 4 GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE their successful transition to democracies, that became members. Green parties did not have a strong role in their national party systems, and European elections became an important focus for party develop- ment. In the 1990s it was the turn of Austria, Finland and Sweden to join; green parties were already well established in all three nations and provided ongoing support for Greens in the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bluegreen Alliance : New Labor-Environment Strategies To
    Perspective | FES Washington The BlueGreen Alliance New Labor-Environment Strategies To Address Climate Change and the Economic Crisis JIM YOUNG, MARGRETE STRAND RANGNES, ASHLEY HAUGO, LEAH BREGMAN July 2011 nnThe BlueGreen Alliance (BGA) is a unique partnership between ten labor unions and four environmental organizations in the United States, uniting over 14 million Ameri- cans in pursuit of expanding the number and quality of jobs in the green economy. nnThrough legislative advocacy, grassroots education and mobilization, economic de- velopment training, and collaboration with socially responsible businesses, BGA’s multi-faceted approach works to tackle America’s jobs deficit and advance every sector of a green economy. nnWith proven success in the U.S., and with a spin-off BGA now up and running in Canada, BGA looks to expand its work internationally to help foster similar partner- ships abroad, starting with partners in Africa, Asia and Europe. nnBGA has launched a nationwide Jobs21 campaign to ensure the industries of the future – renewable energy, energy efficiency, transportation, broadband and smart grid – are built in the U.S. to help revitalize the nation’s economy and recover the seven million jobs lost during the Great Recession. Young, Strand Rangnes, Haugo, Bregman | The BlueGreen Alliance Introduction: The BlueGreen Alliance, climate From telephone linemen to teachers and from steel- change and the worldwide economic crisis workers to construction workers, the BlueGreen Alliance represents workers and industries from every sector of The BlueGreen Alliance (BGA) is a national, strategic the U.S. economy, and a wide swath of environmental partnership between labor unions and environmental or- activists working on issues including conservation, cli- ganizations in the United States dedicated to expanding mate change, energy, toxics, recycling and public health.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration Policymaking in the Newest Era of Nativist Populism
    IN SEARCH OF A NEW EQUILIBRIUM: IMMIGRATION POLICYMAKING IN THE NEWEST ERA OF NATIVisT POPULisM By Demetrios G. Papademetriou, Kate Hooper, and Meghan Benton TRANSATLANTIC COUNCIL ON MIGRATION IN SEARCH OF A NEW EQUILIBRIUM Immigration Policymaking in the Newest Era of Nativist Populism By Demetrios G. Papademetriou, Kate Hooper, and Meghan Benton November 2018 Acknowledgments This research was commissioned for the eighteenth plenary meeting of the Transatlantic Council on Migration, an initiative of the Migration Policy Institute (MPI), held in Stockholm in November 2017. The meeting’s theme was “The Future of Migration Policy in a Volatile Political Landscape,” and this report was one of several that informed the Council’s discussions. The authors are grateful for Lauren Shaw’s helpful edits and for research assistance from Brian Salant, Gonzaga Mbalungu, Jeffrey Hallock, and Jae June Lee. The Council is a unique deliberative body that examines vital policy issues and informs migration policymaking processes in North America and Europe. The Council’s work is generously supported by the following foundations and governments: the Open Society Foundations, Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Barrow Cadbury Trust, the Luso- American Development Foundation, the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, and the governments of Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden. For more on the Transatlantic Council on Migration, please visit: www.migrationpolicy.org/ transatlantic. © 2018 Migration Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved. Cover Design: April Siruno, MPI Layout: Sara Staedicke, MPI No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Migration Policy Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • A Layman's Guide to the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict
    CJPME’s Vote 2019 Elections Guide « Vote 2019 » Guide électoral de CJPMO A Guide to Canadian Federal Parties’ Positions on the Middle East Guide sur la position des partis fédéraux canadiens à propos du Moyen-Orient Assembled by Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East Préparé par Canadiens pour la justice et la paix au Moyen-Orient September, 2019 / septembre 2019 © Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East Preface Préface Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East Canadiens pour la paix et la justice au Moyen-Orient (CJPME) is pleased to provide the present guide on (CJPMO) est heureuse de vous présenter ce guide Canadian Federal parties’ positions on the Middle électoral portant sur les positions adoptées par les East. While much has happened since the last partis fédéraux canadiens sur le Moyen-Orient. Canadian Federal elections in 2015, CJPME has Beaucoup d’eau a coulé sous les ponts depuis les élections fédérales de 2015, ce qui n’a pas empêché done its best to evaluate and qualify each party’s CJPMO d’établir 13 enjeux clés relativement au response to thirteen core Middle East issues. Moyen-Orient et d’évaluer les positions prônées par chacun des partis vis-à-vis de ceux-ci. CJPME is a grassroots, secular, non-partisan organization working to empower Canadians of all CJPMO est une organisation de terrain non-partisane backgrounds to promote justice, development and et séculière visant à donner aux Canadiens de tous peace in the Middle East. We provide this horizons les moyens de promouvoir la justice, le document so that you – a Canadian citizen or développement et la paix au Moyen-Orient.
    [Show full text]
  • Revalidating Participation: Power and Pre - Figurative Politics Within Contemporary Leftwing Movements
    Bart Cammaerts Revalidating participation: power and pre - figurative politics within contemporary leftwing movements Book section Original citation: Cammaerts, Bart (2019) Revalidating participation: power and pre -figurative politics within contemporary leftwing movements. In: Carpentier, Nico, (ed.) Respublika!: Experiments in the performance of participation and democracy. NeMe, Limassol, Cyprus, pp. 126-137. ISBN 9789963969586 © 2019 The Author This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/91502 Available in LSE Research Online: January 2019 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors a nd/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL ( http://eprints.lse.ac.uk ) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s submitted version of the book section. There may be differences between this ve rsion and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Revalidating Participation: Power and Pre-Figurative Politics within Contemporary Leftwing Movements 1 Bart Cammaerts London School of Economics and Political Science Introduction ‘Practice what you preach’ is a popular idiom not only within progressive politics, but also beyond, and this idea is also encapsulated in the famous Mahatma Gandhi quote: ‘If you want to change the world, start with yourself’.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Significant Breakthrough by the Far Right in Flanders, Victory for The
    PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN BELGIUM 26th May 2019 European Significant breakthrough Elections monitor by the far right in Flanders, victory for the Socialist Party in Corinne Deloy Wallonia and Brussels: Belgium divided more than ever before Results The Belgian general election took place on 26th May revealing a greatly divided country. The far-right made a significant breakthrough in Flanders came first in the election despite a loss of seats: 20[1] in the shape of the Vlaams Belang (Flemish Interest, VB), (- 3). It came out ahead of the Reform Movement (MR), a party chaired by Tom Van Grieken. Although the New a liberal party led by outgoing Prime Minister Charles Alliance (N-VA), a nationalist party chaired by Bart de Michel, which recorded a loss of support, winning 14 Wever, is still the region’s leading party with 25 seats, it seats (- 6); Ecolo, a party led co-led by Zakia Khattabi lost some seats however (-8 seats in comparison with the and Jean-Marc Nollet, won 13 seats (+ 7) and the Labour previous parliamentary elections on 25th May 2014) and Party, making strong progress, won 12 seats (+10). failed to rise above the 30% vote threshold. The Vlaams The Humanist Democratic Centre (cDH), led by Maxime Belang came second with 18 seats (+15). Prévot, came fifth (5 MPs, - 4). The Christian Democratic Party (CD&V), led by Wouter In Brussels, the socialists also came out ahead, just in 1. Here the number Beke, came third, but with fewer seats: 12 MPs (-6). front of the French-speaking ecologists who witnessed a of seats and for the following parties is Then come the Liberals and Democrats (Open VLD), a sharp rise in support.
    [Show full text]
  • ALLIANCE 90/THE GREENS: Party Program and Principles the Future Is Green
    The future is green. ALLIANCE 90/THE GREENS: Party Program and Principles The future is green. ALLIANCE 90/THE GREENS: Party Program and Principles Preamble 7 I. Our values 7 Ecology is sustainability 8 Freedom is realised through self-determination 8 Extending equitability 9 Democracy is the basis 10 The touchstone of our values: Human rights and non-violence 11 II. Challenges in a changing world 12 III. Where we come from – who we are 16 IV. Twelve for 2020 17 Towards the ecological age 18 I. The fundamental principles of our environmental policy 19 II. Sustainable development as a principle for action 20 III. Economical use of resources and the efficiency revolution 21 IV. Ecology and lifestyle 22 V. New energy – from the fossil and nuclear age to the solar future 22 A key project: Towards the solar age 24 Sustainable development in towns and local areas 25 VI. Environmentally-friendly traffic systems 27 A key project: Ecologically mobile 29 1 The future is green. VII. Nature and landscape conservancy 30 VIII. Animals need rights 31 IX. A global perspective for the environment and development 32 Towards an ecological and social market economy 34 I. The foundations of our economic policy 35 A key project: The future of a united Germany 38 II. Market economy and regulative policy 39 A key project: Transparency for consumers 40 III. Ecological fiscal reform 40 IV. Consumer protection 41 V. The knowledge economy 41 VI. Regional economies 42 A key project: A new form of agriculture 43 VII. A sustainable fiscal policy 45 VIII.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Political Studies
    Comparative Political Studies http://cps.sagepub.com/ Comparing Strategic Voting Under FPTP and PR Paul R. Abramson, John H. Aldrich, André Blais, Matthew Diamond, Abraham Diskin, Indridi H. Indridason, Daniel J. Lee and Renan Levine Comparative Political Studies 2010 43: 61 originally published online 30 July 2009 DOI: 10.1177/0010414009341717 The online version of this article can be found at: http://cps.sagepub.com/content/43/1/61 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Comparative Political Studies can be found at: Email Alerts: http://cps.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://cps.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://cps.sagepub.com/content/43/1/61.refs.html Downloaded from cps.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on November 22, 2010 Comparative Political Studies 43(1) 61–90 © 2010 SAGE Publications Comparing Strategic DOI: 10.1177/0010414009341717 Voting Under FPTP http://cps.sagepub.com and PR Paul R. Abramson1 John H. Aldrich2 André Blais3 Matthew Diamond4 Abraham Diskin5 Indridi H. Indridason6 Daniel J. Lee1 Renan Levine7 Abstract Based on recent work that suggests that voters in proportional represen­ tation (PR) systems have incentives to cast strategic votes, the authors hypothesize that levels of strategic voting are similar in both first­past­the­ post (FPTP) and PR systems. Comparing vote intentions in majoritarian elections in the United States, Mexico, Britain, and Israel to PR elections in Israel and the Netherlands, the authors find that a substantial proportion of 1Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA 2Duke University, Durham, NC, USA 3Université de Montréal, CANADA 4Community Midrasha of Durham­Chapel Hill, Durham, NC, USA 5Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, JERUSALEM 6University of California, Riverside, CA, USA 7University of Toronto, CANADA Corresponding author: Renan Levine, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, 100 St.
    [Show full text]