Fredrica Hedge Axelsson
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
In the event of a zombie apocalypse: An investigation into policies of long-term preservation of digital media in the modern world of Open Access institutional repositories Fredrica Hedge Axelsson Institutionen för ABM Uppsatser inom biblioteks- & informationsvetenskap ISSN 1650-4267 Masteruppsats, 30 högskolepoäng, 2012, nr 582 Författare/Author Fredrica Hedge Axelsson Svensk titel I händelse av en zombie-apokalyps: En undersökning av policies inom långsiktigt bevarande av digitala medi - er i den moderna världen av Open Access institutionella arkiv. English Title In the event of a zombie apocalypse: An investigation into policies of long-term preservation of digital media in the modern world of Open Access institutional repositories. Handledare/Supervisor Urban Ericsson Abstract With the purpose to investigate policies within long-term preservation of digital media in the modern world of Open Access institutional repository, this two year's master thesis was conducted through a qualitative study with quantitative overtures. The main objectives of this thesis centre on the criteria for long-term digital preser - vation, preservation in relation to institutional repositories, the issues cropping up within the field of institu - tional repositories, and the essential components of a preservation policy. The theoretical framework is constructed around a model based upon scholarly communication, with its aspects of dissemination, acquisition, preservation, discovery and access, and with the facet of preservation at its centre. The methodology of this study is cued to content analysis and its in-depth investigative process, which was conducted on a sample of ten preservation policies within Open Access institutional repositories that were compared to a standardised expert set of policy categorisation. The results show that a perfect preservation policy does not appear to exist in the current world, based ex- clusively on the selected sample. This gives a strong indication of a need for further research within the field of Open Access institutional repositories preservation policies. Abstrakt I syfte att undersöka policyer inom långsiktigt bevarande av digitala medier i den moderna världen av Open Access institutionella arkiv, genomfördes denna tvååriga masteruppsats genom en kvalitativ studie med kvantitativa uvertyrer. De huvudsakliga frågeställningarna i denna uppsats är centrerade kring kriterierna för långsiktigt digitalt bevarande, bevarandet i förhållande till institutionella arkiv, problem som dyker upp inom fältet för institutionella arkiv, och de essentiella komponenterna för en långtidsbevarande policy. Det teoretiska ramverket är uppbyggt runt en modell som utgår ifrån vetenskaplig kommunikation, med dess aspekter av spridning, förvärv, bevarande, upptäckt och tillgänglighet, med bevarandeaspekten i centrum. Metoden för denna studie är centrerad till innehållsanalys och dess fördjupande undersökningsprocess, och som applicerades på tio utvalda Open Access institutionella arkivs bevarande-policyer, som sedan jämfördes med en uppsättning standardiserade kategorier, utvalda av experter, för en sådan policy. Resultaten visade att en perfekt långtidsbevarande policy inte existerar i dagens verklighet, om man utgår från studiens urval. Detta ger en stark indikation på att det finns ett behov av att göra ytterligare forskning inom området för institutionella arkivs bevarande policy inom Open Access-världen. Ämnesord Open access-publicering, policyforskning, policyanalys, institution, arkiv Keywords Open access, Policy, Institutional libraries, Archive Acknowledgements First acknowledgement of gratitude goes to my thesis supervisor Urban Ericsson for guiding and leading me through the crooked and twisting way of this research and for the encourage- ments passed out along the way. I would also like to shower a special thank you and a lot of gratitude upon the two amazing people, Lisa Granelli and James Barton, who helped with providing insights into, and giving critique on, this thesis. For their continued support, encour- agement and correction during the creation of this thesis a special thank you goes to the three phenomenal and lovely ladies, Sofie Johansson, Linda Gustafsson and Lina Hesterman, of my thesis group at Uppsala University. And last, but absolutely not least, I would like to give a particular acknowledgement of gratitude and love to Ida Fasén for the insightful and cheerful zombie inspiration she provided at the inception of this thesis. Table of Content Context of Study..................................................................................7 Aim and Objectives...............................................................................................7 Disposition............................................................................................................8 Background..........................................................................................9 Institutional Repositories and Open Access..........................................................9 Policies................................................................................................................11 Concept of Preservation.....................................................................................12 Theoretical Framework....................................................................16 Scholarly Communication...................................................................................16 Preservation........................................................................................................19 Methodology.......................................................................................21 Qualitative and Quantitative...............................................................................21 Content Analysis.................................................................................................22 Thesis Methodology...........................................................................................29 Investigation and Analysis................................................................30 Digital Preservation............................................................................................30 Metadata..................................................................................................................33 Hardware and Software Obsolescence......................................................................34 Format......................................................................................................................36 Migration, Emulation and Refreshing.......................................................................37 Authenticity..............................................................................................................39 Persistent Identifiers.................................................................................................40 Standards..................................................................................................................41 Access......................................................................................................................41 OpenDOAR........................................................................................................42 JISC....................................................................................................................43 Selection Process................................................................................................44 The “Perfect” Policy...........................................................................................47 Coding Scheme...................................................................................................48 Quantitative Analysis..........................................................................................52 Qualitative Analysis.............................................................................................53 Overall Differences.............................................................................................56 Final Discussion.................................................................................58 Conclusion..........................................................................................61 Bibliography......................................................................................64 5 Published material...............................................................................................64 Appendix A: Retrieved OpenDOAR list..........................................69 1. Biblio at UGent...............................................................................................70 2. eScholarship Repository.................................................................................71 3. cIRcle..............................................................................................................74 4. DigitalCommons@UNL.................................................................................77 5. JScholarship....................................................................................................80 6. STFC ePublication Archive.............................................................................82 7. Lancaster EPrints............................................................................................86 8. TU Delft Digital Repository...........................................................................90 9. Caltech