DOCSLIB.ORG

RICE UNIVERSITY Scott Chamberlain Doctor of Philosophy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RICE UNIVERSITY Scott Chamberlain Doctor of Philosophy ! RICE UNIVERSITY VARIATION IN SPECIES INTERACTIONS AND THEIR EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES by Scott Chamberlain A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE Doctor of Philosophy APPROVED, THESIS COMMITTEE Jennifer A. Rudgers, Co-Chair Associate Professor Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Kenneth D. Whitney, Co-Chair Associate Professor Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Volker H.W. Rudolf Associate Professor Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Dennis D. Cox Professor Statistics HOUSTON, TEXAS May 2012 ! ! ! ABSTRACT VARIATION IN SPECIES INTERACTIONS AND THEIR EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES by Scott Chamberlain Species'interactions'restrict'or'promote'population'growth,'structure'communities,'and' contribute'to'evolution'of'diverse'taxa.'I'seek'to'understand'how'multiple'species' interactions'are'maintained,'how'human'altered'species'interactions'influence' evolution,'and'explore'factors'that'contribute'to'variation'in'species'interactions.'In' Chapter'1,'I'examine'how'plants'interact'with'multiple'guilds'of'mutualists,'many'of' which'are'costly'interactions.'The'evolution'of'traits'used'to'attract'different'mutualist' guilds'may'be'constrained'due'to'ecological'or'genetic'mechanisms.'I'asked'if'two'sets' of'plant'traits'that'mediate'interactions'with'two'guilds'of'mutualists,'pollinators'and' ant'bodyguards,'were'positively'or'negatively'correlated'across'36'species'of'Gossypium) (cotton).'Traits'to'attract'pollinators'were'positively'correlated'with'traits'to'attract'ant' bodyguards.'Rather'than'interaction'with'one'mutualist'guild'limiting'interactions'with' another'mutualist'guild,'traits'have'evolved'to'increase'attraction'of'multiple'mutualist' guilds'simultaneously.'In'Chapters'2'and'3,'motivated'by'the'fact'that'agriculture'covers' nearly'50%'of'the'global'vegetated'land'surface,'I'explore'the'consequences'of'changes' in'plant'mutualist'and'antagonist'guilds'in'agriculture'for'selection'on'plant'traits.'I'first' explore'how'agriculture'alters'abundance'and'community'structure'of'mutualist' ! ! ! pollinators'and'antagonist'seed'predators'of'wild'Helianthus)annuus)texanus.'Mutualists' were'more'abundant'near'crops,'whereas'antagonists'were'more'abundant'far'from' crops'near'natural'habitat.'In'addition,'mutualist'pollinator'communities'were'more' diverse'near'sunflower'crops.'Plant'mutualists'and'antagonists'respond'differently'to' agriculture.'Next,'I'explore'how'these'changes'in'abundance'and'community'structure' of'mutualists'and'antagonists'influenced'natural'selection'on'H.)a.)texanus'floral'traits.' Natural'selection'on'heritable'floral'traits'differed'near'versus'far'from'crop'sunflowers,' and'overall'selection'was'more'heterogeneous'near'crop'sunflowers.'Furthermore,' mutualist'pollinators'and'antagonist'seed'predators'mediated'these'differences'in' selection.'Finally,'in'Chapter'4,'I'ask'if'variation'in'interaction'outcomes'differs'across' types'of'species'interactions.'Furthermore,'I'examined'the'relative'importance'of' factors'that'create'contextOdependency'in'species'interactions.'Using'metaOanalysis'of' 353'papers,'we'found'that'mutualisms'were'more'likely'to'change'sign'of'the' interaction'outcome'when'compared'across'contexts'than'competition,'and'predation' was'the'least'likely'to'change'sign.'Overall,'species'identity'caused'the'greatest'variation' in'interaction'outcomes:'whom)you'interact'with'is'more'important'for'contextO dependency'than'where)or'when)the'interaction'occurs.'Additionally,'the'most' important'factors'driving'contextOdependency'differed'significantly'among'species' interaction'types.'Altogether,'my'work'makes'progress'in'understanding'how'species' maintain'interactions'with'multiple'guilds'of'mutualists,'how'agriculture'alters'species' interactions'and'subsequent'natural'selection,'and'the'variation'in'species'interaction' outcomes'and'their'causes.! ! ! Acknowledgments I!would!like!to!thank!many!people!for!field!and!laboratory!assistance,!or! facilitating!field!or!lab!work:!Yosuke!Akiyama,!Loren!Albert,!Wael!Al>Wawi,!Rameez! Anwar,!Morgan!Black,!Sean!Campbell,!Charles!Danan,!Neha!Deshpande,!James! Frelichowski,!Alex!Gorischek,!Toby!Liss,!Janna!Love,!Edward!Realzola,!Randall!Ross,!Liz! Seifert,!Rohini!Sigireddi,!and!Prudence!Sun.!Thanks!to!Jonathan!Wendel!for!help!on! construction!of!the!Gossypium!phylogeny.!Thanks!to!the!following!people!for!comments! and!help!on!manuscripts:!Jennifer!Rudgers,!Ken!Whitney,!and!Elizabeth!Elle.!I!am! grateful!to!my!advisors,!Jennifer!Rudgers!and!Ken!Whitney,!for!their!unwavering! support!and!guidance!through!the!duration!of!this!thesis!work.!I!am!indebted!to!my! committee!members!Volker!Rudolf!and!Dennis!Cox!for!their!support!throughout!this! thesis.!Thanks!to!all!the!grad!students!in!the!Ecology!and!Evolutionary!Biology! Department!for!their!advice,!support,!and!encouragement.!I!was!supported!by!a!very! small,!but!gracious!grant!from!the!Biotic!Research!Foundation,!and!by!generous! financial!support!by!my!advisors.!My!loved!ones!made!this!possible!by!providing! emotional!support:!Jeff!and!Janet!Chamberlain,!and!Katherine!Horn.! ! ! ! Contents Acknowledgments........................................................................................................iv' Contents........................................................................................................................v' List.of.Figures..............................................................................................................viii' List.of.Tables..................................................................................................................x' 1..How.do.plants.balance.multiple.mutualists?.Correlations.among.traits.for.attracting. protective.bodyguards.and.pollinators.in.cotton.(Gossypium)........................................1' 1.1.'Abstract'..........................................................................................................................'1' 1.2.'Introduction'...................................................................................................................'2' 1.3.'Materials'and'Methods'..................................................................................................'5' 1.4.'Results'..........................................................................................................................'13' 1.5.'Discussion'....................................................................................................................'15' 1.6.'Conclusion'....................................................................................................................'19' 1.7.'Acknowledgements'......................................................................................................'19' 1.8.'References'...................................................................................................................'20' 1.9.'Tables'...........................................................................................................................'28' 1.10.'Figures'........................................................................................................................'30' 1.11.'Appendix'A'.................................................................................................................'32' 1.12.'Appendix'B'.................................................................................................................'34' 1.13.'Appendix'C'.................................................................................................................'35' 1.14.'Appendix'D'.................................................................................................................'40' 2..Proximity.to.agriculture.alters.abundance.and.community.structure.of.wild.sunflower. mutualists.and.antagonists..........................................................................................41' 2.1.'Abstract'........................................................................................................................'41' 2.2.'Introduction'.................................................................................................................'42' 2.3.'Materials'and'Methods'................................................................................................'45' 2.4.'Results'..........................................................................................................................'55' 2.5.'Discussion'....................................................................................................................'61' 2.6.'Conclusion'....................................................................................................................'66' ! vi! ! 2.7.'Acknowledgements'......................................................................................................'67' 2.8.'References'...................................................................................................................'67' 2.9.'Tables'...........................................................................................................................'75' 2.10.'Figures'........................................................................................................................'76' 2.11.'Appendix'A'.................................................................................................................'81' 3..Proximity.to.crop.sunflowers.affects.patterns.of.natural.selection.in.a.wild.relative. through.plant.mutualists.and.antagonists....................................................................83'
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Characteristics and Potential Causes of Declining Diporeia Spp
    Characteristics and Potential Causes of Declining Diporeia spp. Populations in Southern Lake Michigan and Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron Thomas F. Nalepa1 Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, NOAA 2205 Commonwealth Blvd. Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A. 48105 David L. Fanslow Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, NOAA 2205 Commonwealth Blvd. Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A. 48105 Gretchen Messick Cooperative Oxford Laboratory, NOAA 904 S. Morris Street Oxford, Maryland, U.S.A. 21654 Abstract Populations of the amphipods Diporeia spp. are declining in all of the Great Lakes except Lake Superior. We examine characteristics and potential causes of declines in southern Lake Michigan and outer Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. Amphipod populations began to decline within 3-4 years after zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) colonized both areas. In Lake Michigan, which was better studied, the decline occurred first in shallow waters (<30 m) and then progressed deeper (51-90 m). Between 1980- 1981 (pre-Dreissena) and 1998-1999 (post-Dreissena), densities at sites in these two depth intervals declined 92% 1 Corresponding author: [email protected] 157 and 58%, respectively. At a 45-m site in southeastern Lake Michigan, densities of Diporeia spp. declined to near zero within six months even though mussels were never collected at the site itself. At a nearby 45-m site, densities declined gradually to zero over a six-year period and correlated with increased mussel densities. Although mussels are likely outcompeting Diporeia spp. populations for food, and food limitation is probably a contributing factor to population declines, populations show no physiological signs of starvation; lipid content is at a maximum as densities approach zero.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Mcmullin-Phd-Thesis2.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Biology PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF DEEP-SEA VESTIMENTIFERANS AND A POPULATION GENETICS STUDY OF TWO SPECIES, LAMELLIBRACHIA LUYMESI AND SEEPIOPHILA JONESI, FROM THE GULF OF MEXICO A Thesis in Biology by Erin R. McMullin © 2003 Erin R. McMullin Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2003 The thesis of Erin McMullin has been reviewed and approved* by the following: Charles R. Fisher Professor of Biology Thesis Co-Adviser Co-Chair of Committee Stephen W. Schaeffer Associate Professor of Biology Thesis Co-Adviser Co-Chair of Committee Andrew Clark Professor of Biology Lee Kump Professor of Geosciences Kimberlyn Nelson Forensic Examiner Mitotyping Technologies Special Signatory Douglas Cavener Professor of Biology Head of the Biology Department * Signatures are on file at the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT First discovered in 1977 on the Galapagos Rift, vestimentiferans are a group of deep-sea annelids found in a variety of environments worldwide. Vestimentiferan communities are isolated pockets of high biomass in the otherwise nutrient-poor deep-sea. Chemosynthesis, not photosynthesis, is the underlying energy source for vestimentiferans, which entirely lack a digestive tract and rely on internal sulfide-oxidizing symbionts for fixed carbon. Symbionts appear to be acquired by the motile vestimentiferan larvae before they settle and become sessile adults. The ability of both these organisms and their symbionts to disperse across the sometimes considerable distances between sulfidic environments has been a topic of study for over a decade. This study addresses the question of dispersal by two different methods, with a biogeographical approach of all vestimentiferan species, and through the population genetic analysis of two species within the Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aquatic Glacial Relict Fauna of Norway – an Update of Distribution and Conservation Status
    Fauna norvegica 2016 Vol. 36: 51-65. The aquatic glacial relict fauna of Norway – an update of distribution and conservation status Ingvar Spikkeland1, Björn Kinsten2, Gösta Kjellberg3, Jens Petter Nilssen4 and Risto Väinölä5 Spikkeland I, Kinsten B, Kjellberg G, Nilssen JP, Väinölä R. 2016. The aquatic glacial relict fauna of Norway – an update of distribution and conservation status. Fauna norvegica 36: 51-65. The aquatic “glacial relict” fauna in Norway comprises a group of predominantly cold-water animals, mainly crustaceans, which immigrated during or immediately after the deglaciation when some of the territory was still inundated by water. Their distribution is mainly confined to lakes in the SE corner of the country, east of the Glomma River in the counties of Akershus, Østfold and Hedmark. We review the history and current status of the knowledge on this assemblage and of two further similarly distributed copepod species, adding new observations from the last decades, and notes on taxonomical changes and conservation status. By now records of original populations of these taxa have been made in 42 Norwegian lakes. Seven different species are known from Lake Store Le/Foxen on the Swedish border, whereas six species inhabit lakes Femsjøen, Øymarksjøen and Rødenessjøen, and five are found in Aspern, Aremarksjøen and in the largest Norwegian lake, Mjøsa. From half of the localities only one of the species is known. The most common species are Mysis relicta (s.str.), Pallaseopsis quadrispinosa and Limnocalanus macrurus. Some populations may have become extirpated recently due to eutrophi- cation, acidification or increased fish predation. Apart from the main SE Norwegian distribution, some lakes of Jæren, SW Norway, also harbour relict crustaceans, which is puzzling.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphipoda Key to Amphipoda Gammaridea
    GRBQ188-2777G-CH27[411-693].qxd 5/3/07 05:38 PM Page 545 Techbooks (PPG Quark) Dojiri, M., and J. Sieg, 1997. The Tanaidacea, pp. 181–278. In: J. A. Blake stranded medusae or salps. The Gammaridea (scuds, land- and P. H. Scott, Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa hoppers, and beachhoppers) (plate 254E) are the most abun- Maria Basin and western Santa Barbara Channel. 11. The Crustacea. dant and familiar amphipods. They occur in pelagic and Part 2 The Isopoda, Cumacea and Tanaidacea. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California. benthic habitats of fresh, brackish, and marine waters, the Hatch, M. H. 1947. The Chelifera and Isopoda of Washington and supralittoral fringe of the seashore, and in a few damp terres- adjacent regions. Univ. Wash. Publ. Biol. 10: 155–274. trial habitats and are difficult to overlook. The wormlike, 2- Holdich, D. M., and J. A. Jones. 1983. Tanaids: keys and notes for the mm-long interstitial Ingofiellidea (plate 254D) has not been identification of the species. New York: Cambridge University Press. reported from the eastern Pacific, but they may slip through Howard, A. D. 1952. Molluscan shells occupied by tanaids. Nautilus 65: 74–75. standard sieves and their interstitial habitats are poorly sam- Lang, K. 1950. The genus Pancolus Richardson and some remarks on pled. Paratanais euelpis Barnard (Tanaidacea). Arkiv. for Zool. 1: 357–360. Lang, K. 1956. Neotanaidae nov. fam., with some remarks on the phy- logeny of the Tanaidacea. Arkiv. for Zool. 9: 469–475. Key to Amphipoda Lang, K.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulkokrunni and Merikalla
    2013 2 ECT J RO P EA S C I T L A B Oceana proposal for a Marine Protected Area Ulkokrunni and Merikalla INTRODUCTION OF THE AREA The two areas, Ulkokrunni and Merikalla, are situated in the Finnish EEZ, in the northern part of the Baltic Sea, the Bothian Bay. The Bothnian Bay is characterized by having a low salinity of 3.5 psu, which limits the number of marine species living there (Bergström and Bergström 1999) and freshwater species are more common. During winter the bay has at least four months of ice, which also affects which species can live there. The Ulkokrunni area consists of small scattered islands and primarily shallow waters. However, deeper areas down to almost 100 meter also exist. Merikalla is a shallow area situated almost 20 km west of the island Hailuoto, and south of Ulkokrunni. In the spring of 2011, Oceana conducted research in the area of Ulkokrunni, and in the spring of 2012, a more comprehensive research was carried out in the area of Ulkokrunni. Additionally Merikalla was also carefully studied by an ROV (Remotely Operated Vehicle). 1 2 Ulkokrunni and Merikalla DESCRipTION OF THE AREA There are important offshore sandbanks in the northern Baltic Sea. The deeper parts of the Bothnian Bay have relatively good oxygen concentration as this part of the Baltic Sea is not suffering severely from eutrophication, compared to the other areas of the Baltic Sea where the deeps are oxygen depleted or anoxic most of the time. Therefore the deeper areas in the bay are characterized by having oxygen and animal life.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretation Manual of European Union Habitats - EUR27 Is a Scientific Reference Document
    INTERPRETATION MANUAL OF EUROPEAN UNION HABITATS EUR 27 July 2007 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG ENVIRONMENT Nature and biodiversity The Interpretation Manual of European Union Habitats - EUR27 is a scientific reference document. It is based on the version for EUR15, which was adopted by the Habitats Committee on 4. October 1999 and consolidated with the new and amended habitat types for the 10 accession countries as adopted by the Habitats Committee on 14 March 2002 with additional changes for the accession of Bulgaria and Romania as adopted by the Habitats Committee on 13 April 2007 and for marine habitats to follow the descriptions given in “Guidelines for the establishment of the Natura 2000 network in the marine environment. Application of the Habitats and Birds Directives” published in May 2007 by the Commission services. A small amendment to Habitat type 91D0 was adopted by the Habitats Committee in its meeting on 14th October 2003. TABLE OF CONTENTS WHY THIS MANUAL? 3 HISTORICAL REVIEW 3 THE MANUAL 4 THE EUR15 VERSION 5 THE EUR25 VERSION 5 THE EUR27 VERSION 6 EXPLANATORY NOTES 7 COASTAL AND HALOPHYTIC HABITATS 8 OPEN SEA AND TIDAL AREAS 8 SEA CLIFFS AND SHINGLE OR STONY BEACHES 17 ATLANTIC AND CONTINENTAL SALT MARSHES AND SALT MEADOWS 20 MEDITERRANEAN AND THERMO-ATLANTIC SALTMARSHES AND SALT MEADOWS 22 SALT AND GYPSUM INLAND STEPPES 24 BOREAL BALTIC ARCHIPELAGO, COASTAL AND LANDUPHEAVAL AREAS 26 COASTAL SAND DUNES AND INLAND DUNES 29 SEA DUNES OF THE ATLANTIC, NORTH SEA AND BALTIC COASTS 29 SEA DUNES OF THE MEDITERRANEAN COAST 35 INLAND
    [Show full text]
  • Gut Contents As Direct Indicators for Trophic Relationships in the Cambrian Marine Ecosystem Jean Vannier
    Gut Contents as Direct Indicators for Trophic Relationships in the Cambrian Marine Ecosystem Jean Vannier To cite this version: Jean Vannier. Gut Contents as Direct Indicators for Trophic Relationships in the Cam- brian Marine Ecosystem. PLoS ONE, Public Library of Science, 2012, 7 (12), pp.160. 10.1371/journal.pone.0052200,Article-Number=e52200. hal-00832665 HAL Id: hal-00832665 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00832665 Submitted on 11 Dec 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Gut Contents as Direct Indicators for Trophic Relationships in the Cambrian Marine Ecosystem Jean Vannier* Laboratoire de ge´ologie de Lyon: Terre, Plane`tes, Environnement, Universite´ de Lyon, Universite´ Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France Abstract Present-day ecosystems host a huge variety of organisms that interact and transfer mass and energy via a cascade of trophic levels. When and how this complex machinery was established remains largely unknown. Although exceptionally preserved biotas clearly show that Early Cambrian animals had already acquired functionalities that enabled them to exploit a wide range of food resources, there is scant direct evidence concerning their diet and exact trophic relationships. Here I describe the gut contents of Ottoia prolifica, an abundant priapulid worm from the middle Cambrian (Stage 5) Burgess Shale biota.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Matter Sources on the Chukchi Sea Shelf in a Changing Arctic
    Organic matter sources on the Chukchi Sea shelf in a changing Arctic Item Type Thesis Authors Zinkann, Ann-Christine Download date 23/09/2021 20:42:24 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/11304 ORGANIC MATTER SOURCES ON THE CHUKCHI SEA SHELF IN A CHANGING ARCTIC By Ann-Christine Zinkann, M.S. A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Biology University of Alaska Fairbanks May 2020 APPROVED: Katrin Iken, Committee Chair Matthew Wooller, Committee Member Seth Danielson, Committee Member Mary Beth Leigh, Committee Member Georgina Gibson, Committee Member Lara Horstmann, Department Chair Department of Marine Biology Bradley Moran, Dean College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences Michael Castellini, Dean of the Graduate School Abstract Climate-change induced alterations of the organic matter flow from various primary production sources to the benthic system in the Arctic Chukchi Sea could have major implications on carbon cycling, sequestration, and benthic food web structure sustaining upper trophic levels. In particular, the role and contribution of terrestrial matter and bacterial matter could become more prominent, with increasing erosion and permafrost melt being discharged from land, and warming water temperatures raising bacterial metabolism. In this study, I used essential amino acid (EAA) specific stable isotope analysis to trace the proportional contributions of bacterial, phytoplankton, and terrestrial organic matter in sediments, as well as benthic invertebrates on the Chukchi Sea shelf. Across the upper 5 cm of sediments, most organic matter sources were equally distributed, except for a slight decrease with depth in phytoplankton EAA.
    [Show full text]
  • Diurnal Bioturbating Activities of Monoporeia Affinis: Effects on Benthic Oxygen and Nutrient Fluxes
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 331: 195–205, 2007 Published February 16 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Diurnal bioturbating activities of Monoporeia affinis: effects on benthic oxygen and nutrient fluxes Karin Karlson* Göteborg University, Department of Marine Ecology, Box 461, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden ABSTRACT: A laboratory experiment was carried out to investigate the overall effects from the diurnal bioturbating activities of Monoporeia affinis on benthic solute fluxes. Investigations were performed on Baltic Sea sediments during a 12:12 h light:dark cycle, where light conditions (1 µmol photons m–2 s–1) corresponded to those at a simulated water depth of 25 m in July. Oxygen consump- – – + 2– tion, nutrient [NO2 + NO3 , NH4 , Si(OH)4 and HPO4 ] fluxes and denitrification rates were analysed after organic material enrichment (5 g C m–2) of the sediment. Significant effects from the diurnal – – + activity of M. affinis could be observed, as enhanced solute fluxes of O2, NO2 + NO3 , NH4 and 2– HPO4 were found during day (light) compared to night (dark) treatments. The diurnal activity of M. affinis showed no effect on denitrification rates. Irrigation of M. affinis, however, stimulated denitri- fication of the nitrate supplied from the overlying water (Dw) by about 50% compared to the control (no macrofauna). No effect on coupled nitrification/denitrification (Dn) was found. Diurnal activity of meiofauna seemed to have effects on solute fluxes as control cores (no macrofauna) also showed enhanced fluxes during the day compared to at night. In addition, effects from the endogenous diurnal activity of M. affinis were observed in cores kept in total darkness.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendation No. 152 (2011)
    Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats Standing Committee Recommendation No. 152 (2011) of the Standing Committee, adopted on 2 December 2011, on Marine Biodiversity and Climate Change The Standing Committee of the Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats, acting under the terms of Article 14 of the Convention; Having regard to the aims of the Convention to conserve wild flora and fauna and its natural habitats; Aware that the conservation of natural habitats is a vital component of the protection and conservation of wild flora and fauna; Recalling that Article 2 of the Convention requires Parties to take requisite measures to maintain the populations of wild flora and fauna at a level which corresponds in particular to ecological, scientific and cultural requirements, while taking account of economic requirements; Recalling that Article 3 of the Convention requires Parties to undertake to have regard to the conservation of wild fauna and flora in their planning and development policies, and in their measures against pollution; Recalling that Article 4 of the Convention requires Parties to take appropriate measures to ensure the conservation of the habitats of wild flora and fauna species as well as of endangered natural habitats; and give particular attention to the protection of areas of importance for migratory species; Recognising that climate change affects biological diversity in the territory covered by the Convention, including species, habitats and the Areas of
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Sea): the Role of Climatic and Anthropogenic Factors
    ICES CM 2007/C:15 Dynamics of biodiversity in the eastern Gulf of Finland (Baltic Sea): the role of climatic and anthropogenic factors Sergey Golubkov Baltic Sea Regional Project (BSRP), Lead Laboratory on Biodiversity ABSTRACT: Assessment of biological diversity of the Neva Estuary (eastern Gulf of Finland), which is one of the largest Baltic estuaries affected by very high human activity, has been conducted applying BSRP SGEH indicators. They include macrophytobenthos, macrozoobenthos, alien species, ichthyofauna, marine aviafauna, mammals as well as implementation of biodiversity protection measures in the area. Poor biodiversity status was estimated for the upper freshwater Neva Bay, and moderate biodiversity status – for lower brackish part of the estuary. Alien species and eutrophication are the most important threats to biodiversity of the Neva Estuary. At present, alien species contribute about 8 per cent of species richness and 60 - 90 per cent of biomass of the bottom animal communities. Climatic mediated fluctuations in near bottom oxygen conditions are the main natural factor responsible for the dynamics of benthic communities in the open waters of the estuary. These fluctuations also lead to decline of aboriginal and prosperity of invasive species. Filamentous algae blooms and macroalgal floating mats affect biodiversity dynamics in shallow coastal zone. Decline of bottom natural communities mostly dominated by crustacean leads to impairment of food conditions for fish and contributes greatly to sharp reduction of their populations, which in turn may be partly responsible for population decline of ringed seals. Large-scale digging and dumping of bottom sediments connected with constructions of new lands, ports and oil terminals are the main factor affected fish and submerged macrophyte communities in the Neva Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Bothnian Bay Deep
    2013 7 CT JE RO SEA P C I T BAL Oceana proposal for a Marine Protected Area Bothnian Bay Deep INTRODUCTION The Bothnian Bay is located in the northernmost part of the Baltic Sea, with an average depth of 40 meters and its deepest point reaching further than 100 meters1. An archipelago, consisting mainly of sand and gravel islands lies in the north, while the south of the bay boasts a rocky coast and bedrocks. Relatively rapid land upheaval, of approximately 9 mm a year, occurs particularly on the Finnish side of the bay. The Bothnian Bay is frozen on average 170 to 190 days a year and large freshwater rivers run into it, keeping salinity low, at around 3.5 psu2. The Bothnian Bay is in a relatively healthy status, as it is not suffering from eutrophication, and has good oxygen levels3 even in the deeper areas, unlike most of the Baltic Sea, where anoxic bottoms are common due to eutrophication. Oceana studied the deeper parts of the Bothnian Sea in 2011 and 2012 using an ROV (Remote Operating Vehicle). 1 7 Bothnian Bay Deep DesCRipTION OF THE AREA The low salinity, together with the long icy winters, limits the amount of marine species living there to only ten4. However, several freshwater species, such as the vendace (Coregonus albuda), inhabit the bay, which also serves as an important breeding, feeding and nursing ground for fish and birds5. The plankton, fish eggs, and larvae of organisms in the area live in the pelagic water. The photosynthesis by phytoplankton is taking place in the upper layer of the water column, above the halocline, which enrich the water with oxygen.
    [Show full text]