DOCSLIB.ORG

Pope & Talbot's Road Building Efforts Frustrated by Protesters and Mother

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pope & Talbot's Road Building Efforts Frustrated by Protesters and Mother September 14, 2005 The Valley Voice Volume 14, Number 18 September 14, 2005 Delivered to every home between Edgewood, Kaslo & South Slocan. Published bi-weekly. “Your independently-owned regional community newspaper serving the Arrow Lakes, Slocan & North Kootenay Lake Valleys.” Pope & Talbot’s road building efforts frustrated by protesters and Mother Nature by Jan McMurray rare plant species and lichens; and doing a good job. Management has spoke more about the decision to Argenta who wrote a report in 2003 If the protesters can’t keep the habitat for the red-listed mountain changed significantly over the last defer work in the upper valley. calling for Goal 2 protection for the logging crews out, then Mother caribou, blue-listed wolverine, few years and it will continue to do “We’re negotiating with the Ministry upper Incomappleux River Valley, Nature will. The day after protesters grizzly bear and bull trout. The valley, so. We are probably the most of Agriculture and Lands on that pointed out in an interview that the cleared the road in the Incomappleux which is in the Interior Wetbelt or progressive company in the southern one,” he said. “Based on the higher Mountain Caribou Project report River Valley, a rock slide came down Inland Rainforest of BC, was province when it comes to the level plan, we could be in there. There ‘“Staring at Extinction” states that and blocked access. described as “a generally rare forest caribou. Our planning is based on are approved blocks in there, but we P&T is the largest destroyer of habitat For the first eight days of type of global significance” in a brief scientific, statistically sound research. are backing off while we do more for the Central Selkirk herd and the September, a small group of people prepared for the Arrow-Boundary It’s a good process.” research and look at our options.” sixth largest logger in the province stopped Pope & Talbot from getting Forest District by Andre Arsenault, To support that point, Leitch Gary Diers, a silviculturalist from in mountain caribou habitat. into the Boyd Creek area of the Silviculture Systems Researcher, in “The fact is, with all of P&T’s Incomappleux to do road building 2003. fancy caribou planning, the mountain work. They set up what they called Environmental groups are calling caribou are vanishing from the an information camp about 12 km up for the upper valley to be added onto Central Selkirks. Along with the the Incomappleux River Valley road Glacier National Park, where the mountain caribou, the very ancient at the junction of the Boyd Creek headwaters of the river are found. forests are vanishing as well,” he said. Road and the road leading into the When these rare values were A Valhalla Wilderness Watch upper valley. brought to P&T’s attention in 2003, press release states that mountain When an interim injunction was the company had Arsenault go into caribou, which live only in the served on September 9 at about 3:30 the area. The company deferred its Interior Wetbelt of BC except for a pm, the protesters peacefully cleared logging plans in the upper valley as small herd that crosses into Idaho, are the road and set up their information a result of his findings. While P&T completely dependent upon old- camp off to the side. Some P&T acknowledges the sensitivity of the growth forest. The release states that trucks and equipment went through upper valley, Leitch said that the they have declined from 2,450 that afternoon and into the next day. Boyd Creek area was not particularly animals in 1998 to an estimated 1,670 Then, on September 10 around sensitive, calling it “low emphasis in 2004; and of the 13 remaining sub- noon, a rock slide came down and biodiversity.” populations, most are declining did some damage to a bridge just 7.5 A press release issued by the rapidly, none are expanding, six of km up the Incomappleux River protesters says they are “questioning the 13 have fewer than 50 animals. Valley Road from Beaton. the reality of destroying prime habitat The release also refers to BC’s “We are not sure yet how this will for the endangered mountain caribou Forest Practices Board 2004 report affect our plans,” said P&T and grizzly bear.” entitled “BC’s Mountain Caribou: spokesperson Cam Leitch on Leitch says that the Boyd Creek Last Chance for Conservation?” September 12, adding that they area is “outside of the caribou habitat which said: “There appears little time would probably know within a few area as far as the Ministry of left to act before options for mountain days. “Engineers and the Forest Environment is concerned.” Leitch caribou conservation are ultimately Service are looking at it right now.” said that even though it was not forfeited. Current science suggests The company has permits in place to required, P&T hired a wildlife that if older forests continue to be extend a road almost four kilometres technician, who found that the area fragmented and mountain caribou this fall and to clearcut log three did not provide good caribou habitat. continue to be lost to predators, the blocks (33 ha., 21 ha., 5 ha) this However, the area has been final opportunity to restore mountain winter in the Boyd Creek area. identified as core caribou habitat on caribou in the province will soon be Some of the company’s maps created by the southern Colleen McCrory of the VWS stands beside a 1000-year old cedar in the Incommapleux Valley. lost.” equipment is trapped on the other side Recovery Implementation Group of the slide, as are vehicles belonging (RIG) set up by the federal to three people at the information government under the Species at Risk camp and apparently some hunters Act. as well. People are able to scramble Craig Pettitt of Valhalla over the rocks and get out on foot. Wilderness Watch explained that the Eloise Charet, one of the federal government charged the RIGs protesters, reported that as the road to come up with a Recovery Action building crew was driving out after Plan for the mountain caribou, but the slide, one said, “I guess those trees that there is no guarantee that the plan don’t want to be logged.” will be implemented as is. The RIGs The injunction will be challenged came up with the plan about two in Nelson court on September 19. Jo- years ago and “it doesn’t look like anna Cowen is legal counsel for the anything will be finalized for at least two people named on the injunction six months yet,” said Pettitt. “So there and who stayed at the camp is a scramble to log the old growth throughout the protest. These are well terrain before restrictions come in.” known area resident Eloise Charet, Leitch says that old growth is not who calls herself a passive resister, an issue in the Boyd Creek area. “We and Henry Hutter of Winlaw. have met and exceeded our legal The Incomappleux River Valley requirement [to set aside old growth is part of P&T’s Tree Farm Licence areas]. There is lots of old growth up (TFL #23), and was acquired in 1992. there. We can’t save it all,” he said. There has been logging activity in the When asked what he understood valley by various forestry companies to be the protesters’ demands, Leitch since at least the 1970s. answered, “I get mixed messages, but Recently, the valley has caught it is clear that they want no the attention of environmental groups harvesting. They want us to leave all and scientists because of the rare of the old growth. I can’t live with values of the area. These include old- that. growth cedar and hemlock trees, “They’ve got their point of view some that have been estimated to be and we can appreciate that, but we between 1000 and 2000 years old; don’t agree with it. We think we’re This is the rock slide that put an end to Pope & Talbot’s road-buiding efforts in the Incommapleux Valley. COUNTRY FURNITURE & HOME DECOR Looking for something out of the ordinary? Country Furniture & Home Decor, 476 Baker St. Nelson, Toll-Free 1-866-352-3665 2 NEWS The Valley Voice September 14, 2005 Study finds heavier, healthier fish in Kootenay and Arrow Lakes submitted In addition, the fish-eating fish “These are positive results,” says benefits such as improving the here for four generations and I can Even if they aren’t avid anglers, (piscivores) that call the ALR home Steve Arndt, Fisheries Biologist with angling experience for residents and honestly say that, in our time here, many local residents will know that are benefiting from the increased the CBFWCP. “They indicate that visitors alike, including Gord we have never seen the fishing as the fertilization program in Kootenay food supply and anglers are these fish, which are higher in the Roberts, owner of Blue Jay’s Sport good as this year.” Lake and Arrow Lakes Reservoir reportedly reeling in larger fish. But food chain than kokanee, are in better & Marine in Nakusp. Arndt adds that in 2005 the study (ALR) has boosted the number of this is not just another fish tale. A condition now, since we’ve been “Certainly prior to fertilization will be extended to include a larger kokanee. As the kokanee are an preliminary study by the Columbia fertilizing the lake. That means they the fish were smaller,” says Roberts. sample size over a longer time frame ‘indicator’ species of the overall Basin Fish and Wildlife may mature sooner and be more “They had large heads and long — twelve months instead of three.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kootenay System Operations
    Columbia River Treaty Review – Technical Studies Appendix C Kootenay System Operations Operation of the Kootenay River system is complicated as it is administered by several different jurisdictions and the hydroelectric facilities are owned by different agencies/companies. As shown in Figure 1, the Kootenay River originates in the Rocky Mountains not far from Field, BC. The river flows south, within a few km of the source of the Columbia River at Canal Flats, and then continues south into Koocanusa Reservoir, formed behind Libby Dam in Montana, United States. From Libby, the Kootenay River turns west and north, and re-enters British Columbia near the community of Creston, flowing into the south arm of Kootenay Lake. In the northern part of the Kootenay basin, the Duncan River is joined by the Lardeau River just downstream from Duncan Dam, and then flows into the north arm of Kootenay Lake. Water from the north and south arms of Kootenay Lake then flows through the west arm of the lake and past the Corra Linn Dam near Nelson (as well as other dams) en route to the Columbia–Kootenay confluence at Castlegar. The components of this system and various agreements/orders that regulate flows are described in this Appendix. November 29, 2013 1 Columbia River Treaty Review – Technical Studies Figure 1: Kootenay and Columbia Region November 29, 2013 2 Columbia River Treaty Review – Technical Studies 1.0 Coordination of Libby Operations Background Under the terms of the Columbia River Treaty, Canada permitted the U.S. to build the Libby Dam on the Kootenai River (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Kootenay Performance Measures
    Columbia River Treaty Review – Technical Report Appendix H Development of Kootenay Performance Measures Relative to the Columbia River, the Kootenay River system has not had as extensive a history of public planning processes to develop information about interests that may be affected by reservoir levels and flows. As a result, the project team undertook desktop studies to fill in some of the information gaps on the Kootenay system. Estimating how interests on the Kootenay River system might directly be affected by water management alternatives was undertaken using the following methods: Public consultative sessions in spring and fall of 2012; Discussions with individual First Nations; Feedback provided by communities to BC Hydro, FortisBC, and Columbia Power Corporation on operations over a number of years; Reviewing available reports prepared for other planning processes; Drawing parallels with similar situations in other areas of BC for which performance measures had already been developed; and The Fish and Wildlife Technical Committee had as a key focus to develop fish and aquatic ecosystem, and vegetation and wildlife performance measures for the Kootenay system. This appendix reviews the development of the new Kootenay performance measures covering the environmental performance measures reviewed by the Fish and Wildlife Technical Committee and social performance measures on interests that have been raised by basin residents. While detailed information on the Kootenay performance measures is provided in Appendix G, this appendix focuses on the interests that for various reasons did not have a performance measure developed. First Nations Culture and Archaeological Sites The linkages between aboriginal people and the Kootenay River system are long and enduring.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia River Treaty Review Technical Studies Report
    Columbia River Treaty Review Technical Studies Prepared by BC Hydro and Power Authority November 29, 2013 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Approach to Treaty Strategic Decision ............................................................................................... 5 1.3 Process and Scope of Analysis ............................................................................................................ 7 1.3.1 Environmental Advisory Committee and Fish and Wildlife Technical Committee ............. 7 1.3.2 Water Use Plan and Structured Decision Making Process ................................................... 8 Chapter 2: Columbia and Kootenay Hydroelectric System Summary ............................................................. 9 2.1 Operations on the Columbia River - Relationship between Columbia River Treaty, Non Treaty Storage Agreement, and Water Use Plans ............................................................................................... 10 2.2 Operations on the Kootenay River - Relationship between Columbia River Treaty, Duncan Water Use Plan, International Joint Commission Order, and Canal Plant Agreement ...................................... 12 Chapter 3: Selection of Alternatives to Model .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Selkirk Mountains : a Guide for Mountain Climbers and Pilgrims
    J Presentee) to ^be Xibrar^ of tbe xaniversit^ of Toronto bs Her"bert B. Sampson, K,C, Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Toronto http://www.archive.org/details/selkirkmountainsOOwhee THE Selkirk Mountains A Guide for Mountain Climbers and Pilgrims Information by A. O. WHEELER, F.R.G.S., A.C.C., A.C., A.A.C. vo A- Stovel Company, Engravers, Lithographers and Printers, Winnipeg, Man. Arthur O. Wheeler, First President of Alpine Club — CONTENTS Foreword—A. 0. Wlieeler Page 1 One Word More—Elizabeth Parker 2 The Snowy Selkirks—Elizabeth Parker 3-5 CHAPTER I. The Rocky Mountain System—The Selkirks—Early Explorers Later Histor}'—The Railway—Discovery of Rogers Pass—An Alpine Club—Members of British Association Visit the Selkirks, (1884) —Result of Completion of Railway—Government Surveys (1886) —First Scientific Observations of Illecillewaet Glacier Topographical Survey by William Spotswood Green—The Alpine Club, England, and the Swiss Alpine Club—The Appalachian Mountain Club—Triangulation of Railway Belt—Subsequent Mountaineering Pages 6-32 CHAPTER n. Peaks, Passes and Valleys Reached from Glacier—Glacier Park Swiss Guides—Glacier House—Outfits and Ponies—Places and Peaks of Interest Alphabetically Arranged 33-104 CHAPTER m. The Caves of Cheops (Xakimu Caves) —the Valley of the Caves The Approach to the Caves—Formation and Structure—Descrip- tion of Caves—The Mill Bridge Series—The Gorge Series—The Judgment Hall 106-117 CHAPTER IV. •Golden and the Country of the Upper Columbia—Along the Columbia River between Golden and Beavermouth are Several Points of Interest—the Upper Columbia—Travel by Waterway on the Upper Columbia 119-135 CHAPTER V.
    [Show full text]
  • White Paper on COLUMBIA RIVER POST-2024 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE
    White Paper on COLUMBIA RIVER POST-2024 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division September 2011 This page intentionally left blank PREFACE The Columbia River, the fourth largest river on the continent as measured by average annual flow, provides more hydropower than any other river in North America. While its headwaters originate in British Columbia, only about 15 percent of the 259,500 square miles of the river’s basin is located in Canada. Yet the Canadian water accounts for about 38 percent of the average annual flow volume, and up to 50 percent of the peak flood waters, that flow on the lower Columbia River between Oregon and Washington. In the 1940s, officials from the United States and Canada began a long process to seek a collaborative solution to reduce the risks of flooding caused by the Columbia River and to meet the postwar demand for energy. That effort resulted in the implementation of the Columbia River Treaty in 1964. This agreement between Canada and the United States called for the cooperative development of water resource regulation in the upper Columbia River Basin. The Columbia River Treaty has provided significant flood control (also termed flood risk management) and hydropower generation benefiting both countries. The Treaty, and subsequent Protocol, include provisions that both expire on September 16, 2024, 60 years after the Treaty’s ratification, and continue throughout the life of the associated facilities whether the Treaty continues or is terminated by either country. This white paper focuses on the flood risk management changes that will occur on that milestone date and satisfies the following purposes: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Values of the Proposed Selkirk Mountain Caribou Park Jim Lawrence
    Conservation Values of the Proposed Selkirk Mountain Caribou Park Jim Lawrence Submission to the Governments of British Columbia and Canada On the urgent need to fully protect the last remnants of rare Inland Temperate Rainforest in the Central Selkirk Mountains, including habitat for a herd of 30 endangered Mountain Caribou Written 2011 - Updated 2018 Valhalla Wilderness Society Box 329, New Denver, British Columbia, Canada V0G 1S0 Phone: (250) 358-2333, Fax: (250) 358-7950, E-mail: [email protected], Web: http://www.vws.org CONTACT: Craig Pettitt, VWS Director, 250-358-7997 Anne Sherrod, VWS 250-358-2610 i TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY INFORMATION ABOUT THE PARK PROPOSAL Support for the Park Proposal 1 Summary of Conservation Values 2 Ecosystem Gap in BC Parks 3 Park Proposal Map 4 Four Rivers, Four Major Species at Risk 5 Mtn. Caribou Ungulate Winter Range on Park Proposal Map 6 AREAS OF THE PARK PROPOSAL The Incomappaleux 7 Duncan and Lardeau Watersheds 13 GIS MAPS and AUXILIARY INFORMATION Map of clearcuts, Ungulate Winter Range and Park Proposal 15 Map of grizzly bear and wolverine habitat 16 Map and Chart of Biogeoclimatic Zones 17-18 Statistics, Protection of Inland Temperate Rainforest 19 Map of Old Forest in the Park Proposal 20 REFERENCES 21 1 This park proposal is designed to meet the needs identified by two BC Auditor Generals. BC Auditor General, 2010 BC Auditor General, 2017 “We expected the system plan to be considering “There has been little effort to address the issue and ensuring viable representation of British Co- of connectivity for grizzly bears or to provide lumbia’s biogeoclimatic zones, adequate land wildlife corridors and safe transition areas for sizes and adequate connectivity between pro- those populations in the south that may have lim- tected areas ...
    [Show full text]
  • Brilliant Headpond Stewardship Initiative Draft
    DRAFT SCOPING STUDY WORKING COPY FOR VIEWING PURPOSES BRILLIANT ONLY HEADPOND STEWARDSHIP INITIATIVE KATARINA HARTWIG HEATHER LESCHIED MAY 2017 Scoping Study: Brilliant Headpond Stewardship Initiative Katarina Hartwig, Heather Leschied | May 2017 Design and Layout: Mandi McRobbie Cover Photo: Douglas Noblet, WildAir Photography ©2017 Living Lakes Canada All rights reserved. Permission is granted to reproduce all or part of this publication for non-commercial purposes, as long as you cite the source Living Lakes Canada Box 691 Invermere, BC V0A 1K0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Brilliant Headpond Stewardship Initiative Scoping Study is intended to be the first phase of a stewardship strategy for the Brilliant Headpond Reservoir. The Scoping Study is guided by the Brilliant Headpond Stewardship Initiative Steering Committee, which includes leaders from the Brilliant Headpond communities of Tarrys, Thrums, Glade, Shoreacres, and South Slocan, representatives of the Ktunaxa First Nation and Okanagan Nation Alliance, and Regional District of Central Kootenay (RDCK) Area I Director, Andy Davidoff, and RDCK Area H Director, Walter Popoff. The Brilliant Headpond Reservoir (“BHPR”) was created by the damming of the Kootenay River at the Brilliant Canyon for the completion of the West Kootenay Power Corps. Brilliant Dam hydroelectric project completed in 1944. The BHPR area extends from Columbia Power Corporation’s (current owner) Brilliant Dam and Brilliant Expansion Project (2007) upstream to the Slocan Pool area just below BC Hydro’s Kootenay Canal (1975) and FortisBC’s South Slocan (1928) dams. FortisBC owns and operates the four dams on the Lower Kootenay, upstream of Brilliant Dam, and FortisBC operates Brilliant Dam and Brilliant Expansion facilities on behalf of Columbia Power Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Meeting Minutes 2019 Annual Tour and Board Meeting
    Meeting Minutes 2019 Annual Tour and Board Meeting, International Kootenay Lake Board of Control (IKLBC) Thursday, September 19, 2019 Tour: 7:45 AM to 12:30 PM Board Meeting: 2:00 to 4:30 PM Visitor Information Centre, Nelson, British Columbia United States Canada Chair Colonel Mark Geraldi (Remote Attendee) Bruno Tassone (Host) Members Kyle Blasch Ted White Secretariat Kevin Shaffer Martin Suchy IJC Commissioners Lance Yohe IJC Advisors Mark Colosimo Wayne Jenkinson Guests Paul Allen (International Joint Commission, Canadian Section), Dale Ernst (Fortis BC), Caron DeMars (International Joint Commission, United States Section), Adam Greeley (International Joint Commission, United States Section), Dave Hutchinson (Environment and Climate Change Canada), Gillian Kong (BC Hydro), Felicia Minotti (Global Affairs Canada), Shannon Price (Fortis BC), Doug Walker (United States Department of State) IKLBC Board Tour Summary Board members visited the Fortis BC Operations Centre in Castlegar, British Columbia. The tour was led by Dale Ernst, System Operations Manager, and Wayne Gritchin, Power System Supervisor. The facility opened in 2017 and is utilized by Fortis BC to operate and monitor power generating facilities on the Kootenay and Pend Oreille Rivers. Transmission operators also control and monitor distribution ties with customers from the centre. Corra Linn Dam gates can be operated remotely from the centre, as well as at the dam site. Generation at Corra Linn Dam is dispatched under an operating agreement by BC Hydro, while Fortis BC makes decisions on flows and choice of generating units to meet the generation requests. The Kootenay Lake Operating Order specifies the Kootenay Lake Order of Approval and both Fortis BC and BC Hydro monitor dam operations for compliance with the Order.
    [Show full text]
  • The 5Th Annual West Kootenay Glacier Challenge Scotiabank MS Bike Tour!
    The 5th Annual West Kootenay Glacier Challenge Scotiabank MS Bike Tour Courtesy of: Nelson & District Chamber of Commerce 91 Baker Street Nelson B.C. Ph. 250 352 3433 [email protected] discovernelson.com Scotiabank MS Bike Tour August 20-21, 2016 The tour starts in New Denver… Slocan Valley… New Denver- Founded upon the discovery of silver in the mountains adjacent to Slocan Lake in 1891, prospectors from the United States came flooding up to the New Denver region in 1892 to stake their claims, and gather their riches. New Denver quickly grew to a population of 500 people with 50 buildings. In 1895 this growing community built government offices and supply houses for the Silvery Slocan Mines. “A Simple Curve” was filmed in and around the Slocan Valley and was debuted in 2005. The story is of a young man born to war resister parents. War Resisters- In 1976 as many as 14,000 Americans came to the Slocan Valley in an attempt to avoid the Vietnam War. About half of those who made the move were self-proclaimed war resisters, many of whom settled in the Kootenay Region. Nikkei Internment Memorial Centre This exclusive interpretive centre features the Japanese-Canadian internment history of New Denver during the Second World War. The camp is said to have held close to 1500 internees during the war. The memorial centre opened in 1994, which showcases several buildings including the community hall and three restored tar paper shacks with Japanese gardens. A well known Canadian to come out of one of these local institutions is Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Community Engagement in Columbia Basin Hydro
    Community Engagement in Columbia Basin Hydro Operations An Overview of Current Practices August 2015 Community Engagement in Columba Basin Hydro Operations Contents Background and Purpose of this Research...........................................................................................3 Research Methodology and Limitations ..............................................................................................4 KEY FINDINGS: Current Citizen & Stakeholder Engagement Practices ...................................................4 Overview: Columbia River Hydro System Citizen Engagement Practices ...............................................7 INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION (IJC) KOOTENAY LAKE BOARD OF CONTROL ................................ 7 COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY ......................................................................................................................... 8 Assured Operating Plans, Detailed Operating Plans and Supplemental Operations Agreements ....... 8 Libby Coordination Agreement ............................................................................................................. 8 WATER LICENSES ....................................................................................................................................... 9 BC HYDRO .................................................................................................................................................. 9 PLANNING ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution of Impacts to Channel Bed Mobility Due to Flow Regulation, Kootenai River, Usa
    SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF IMPACTS TO CHANNEL BED MOBILITY DUE TO FLOW REGULATION, KOOTENAI RIVER, USA Michael Burke1, Research Associate, University of Idaho ([email protected]); Klaus Jorde1, Professor, University of Idaho; John M. Buffington1,2, Research Geomorphologist, USDA Forest Service; Jeffrey H. Braatne3, Assistant Professor, University of Idaho; Rohan Benjankar1, Research Associate, University of Idaho. 1Center for Ecohydraulics Research, Boise, ID 2Rocky Mountain Research Station, Boise, ID 3College of Natural Resources, Moscow, ID Abstract The regulated hydrograph of the Kootenai River between Libby Dam and Kootenay Lake has altered the natural flow regime, resulting in a significant decrease in maximum flows (60% net reduction in median 1-day annual maximum, and 77%-84% net reductions in median monthly flows for the historic peak flow months of May and June, respectively). Other key hydrologic characteristics have also been affected, such as the timing of annual extremes, and the frequency and duration of flow pulses. Moreover, Libby Dam has impeded downstream delivery of sediment from the upper 23,300 km2 of a 50,000 km2 watershed. Since completion of the facility in 1974, observed impacts to downstream channel bed and bars in semi-confined and confined reaches of the Kootenai River have included coarsening of the active channel bed, homogenization of the channel bed, disappearance of relatively fine-grained beach bars, and invasion of bar surfaces by perennial vegetative species. These impacts have led to reduced aquatic habitat heterogeneity and reduced abundance of candidate recruitment sites for riparian tree species such as black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) and native willows (Salix spp.). Limited quantitative documentation of the pre-regulation substrate composition exists.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacier and Mx Revelstoke
    MOUNT REVELSTOKE NATIONAL PARK HOW TO REACH THE PARK TRAILS GENERAL INFORMATION There are more than 40 miles of improved trails in the 3 British Columbia Mount Revelstoke National Park is accessible by both railway and motor road. A scenic highway has been built park. Perhaps the most popular of these is the trail leading PARKS ADMINISTRATION < GLACIER AND from the main through highway near the town of Revelstoke from the Lookout at the Summit to Millar and Eva Lakes, and Location and Description to the summit of Mount Revelstoke on which the park is Lake of Jade. This trail crosses alpine meadows, popularly The administration of Glacier and Mount Revelstoke situated. In a distance of 18 miles this road rises 4,850 feet known as the "wild flower garden", and skirting the Columbia National Parks is carried out by a superintendent whose office Valley winds through rocky hollows to crystal pools of pale is located at Field in Yoho National Park, British Columbia. to an altitude of 6,350 feet above sea-level, yet it has no The superintendent is assisted by wardens stationed in the 1 Mount Revelstoke National Park is situated on the summit MX REVELSTOKE mental hazards for the average driver. The ascent is gradual green water that reflects the surrounding trees, rocks and parks. Information, maps, and literature concerning the parks of Mount Revelstoke. It has an area of 100 square miles and and is made by a number of switchbacks with sweeping mountains. Millar Lake is 4 miles from the Lookout, and Eva may be obtained from the Superintendent's office and from NATIONAL PARKS occupies a broad undulating plateau at a general elevation curves, with plenty of room for cars to pass.
    [Show full text]