The Skepticism of Clara Peller

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Skepticism of Clara Peller [SKEPTICAL INQUIREE BENJAMIN RADFORD Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry and author or coauthor of seven books, including Mysterious New Mexico: Miracles, Magic, and Monsters in the Land of Enchantment. The Skepticism of Clara Peller Who do you consider to be one of the most types looking over a hamburger at a under-appreciated or neglected skeptics of the past company called “Big Bun” whose giant few decades? bun obscured a tiny beef patty appar- : —L. Roe ently about the size of a hockey puck. Q While the other two little old ladies politely poke around the fluffy bun looking for the meat, the diminutive That’s an interesting track of skeptical contributors over the Peller acts as the brash, outraged voice ques tion. There are many years, and there are dozens of candidates. of directness and reason, uttering her immortal skeptical phrase: “Where’s great, hard-working skep- But I’m going to go with a widely : the Beef?” She plays the role of the boy tics who are little-known known pop culture figure who left a who said the emperor has no clothes— outside of the skeptical lasting (if unlikely) legacy of skep- A the original outspoken skeptic. community, and many more ticism. I’m referring to Clara Peller who are no longer with us. In a follow-up commercial, while (1902–1987), best known for her fa- the two other ladies are on the phone Historians of the skeptical community, mous skeptical question, “Where’s the debating what to say to the Big Bun such as Daniel Loxton and Tim Farley Beef?” in ads for Wendy’s hamburgers. manager about the tiny patty, Pel- (author of the “Skeptical Anniversaries” The ad, originally titled “Fluffy ler will have none of it; she grabs the piece on the last page of this magazine), Bun,” depicted three mild and unas- phone and yells her signature line into have done an admirable job of keeping suming white-haired grandmotherly the receiver so that her message is loud Figure 2. A magazine advertisement for Wendy’s in 2011 Figure 1. The 1984 “Where’s the Beef?” campaign spawned many pop culture items, including hats, T-shirts, stickers, and revived their classic twenty-seven-year-old “Where’s the commemorative plates and cups featuring the skeptical catchphrase. From the author’s collection, photo by the author. Beef?” slogan. 36 Volume 39 Issue 2 | Skeptical Inquirer Beyond Wendy’s and clear. With no answer forthcoming of improving nuclear safety. Just two from the manager, the trio then calls The commercial was a smash hit: weeks later The New York Times fea- the president of Big Bun Incorporated “Hitting the airwaves on Jan. 10, 1984, tured an article about the “Where’s the with their grievance. The owner, a rich ‘Where’s the Beef?’ was an instant Beef?” campaign, and on the popular fat cat on a yacht named the S.S. Big sensation, spawning a series of Peller- NBC comedy 30 Rock, the lead charac- Bun with a butler nearby and a bevy of starring sequels along with a raft of ter Liz Lemon (Tina Fey) states fondly merchandise, from T-shirts to bumper beautiful women in the background, is in episode 516 (February 24, 2011) that stickers to Frisbees to a board game literally bowled over by Peller’s ques- she met Clara Peller. Wendy’s briefly [see Figure 1]. Peller even recorded tion. The catchphrase took aim at rival revived its slogan in a 2011 campaign a ‘Where’s the Beef?’ novelty single hamburger franchises McDonald’s and (Figure 2), which also raised money for Burger King, whose signature sand- with Nashville disc jockey Coyote McCloud” (Nemetz 2014). foster children. wiches contained less beef than Wen- The slogan’s power comes from dy’s hamburgers. The slogan later became a pop cultural shorthand for “Where’s your its no-bullshit simplicity and demand proof?” or “Show me your evidence.” for directness, cutting through corpo- Behind the Ad This pretension-and-hype skewering rate advertising bluster and hype with In the documentary film Art & Copy, slogan was adopted by Walter Mon- three simple words. That this verbal pioneering advertising executive Hal dale during the 1984 presidential pri- challenge began as a commercial slo- Riney stated—perhaps apocryphally— that “They tried to kill ‘Where’s the Beef?’ a week before it was supposed to That this verbal challenge began as a go on the air. The testing service said, ‘Absolutely do not under any circum- commercial slogan does not detract from its stances put that commercial on the air’” importance or value to skepticism; many (Riney 2009). Yet of course they did, and it was later named one of the top commercial slogans use and promote ten advertising slogans of the twentieth important positive messages. century by Ad Age magazine. Of course Peller—as iconic as she was in the role—was just the actress. “The ‘Where’s the beef?’ commercial mary race, and unlike other popular was written by Cliff Freeman and di- gan does not detract from its impor- catchphrases whose expiry dates have rected by Joe Sedelmaier for the Dancer tance or value to skepticism; many long come and gone (Remember “Be Fitzgerald Sample agency. Wendy’s commercial slogans use and promote Like Mike” and “Dude, You’re Get- parted ways with Ms. Peller a year after important positive messages, includ- ting a Dell”?), “Where’s the Beef?” is its debut, in the wake of her appearance ing Nike’s inspirational “Just Do It!” still widely used and recognized nearly in a spot for Prego Plus pasta sauce in and Dove’s self-esteem building “Love a third of a century after its introduc- which she declared: ‘I found it! I really the Skin You’re In” phrases. Skeptics tion. In a July 2, 2014, article in ABQ should embrace widely known skepti- found it!’ Although the Prego parent, Free Press, a newspaper in Albuquer- Campbell Soup, sold no burgers, Wen- que, New Mexico, former governor Bill cal phrases; “Where’s the Beef?” is not dy’s said it believed that Ms. Peller ‘can only a versatile skeptical challenge but Richardson began an article: “‘Where’s ■ find the beef in only one place, and the Beef?’ The slogan from a 1984 ham- one of the best. that is Wendy’s.’ She did not work for burger chain ad could be resurrected to References Wendy’s again and died in 1987” (El- characterize the performance of Gov. Elliott, Stuart. 2014. After 27 years, an answer liott 2014). Susana Martinez. That’s because she When asked by Bryant Gumbel on to the question, ‘Where’s the beef?’ New York has nothing to show for her four years Times (September 26): B4. Today why Clara Peller was so effec- but a dizzying downward in the state’s Nemetz, Dave. 2014. The inside story of the tive in the ads, commercial producer economy . .” (Richardson 2014). Wendy’s ‘Where the Beef?’ Ad, 30 years later. Sedelmaier responded, “Because she’s Though “Where’s the Beef?” has Yahoo TV (January 8). Online at https:// tv.yahoo.com/blogs/yahoo-tv/inside-story- real. Because Clara is Clara—she’s not been embraced by politicians, many wendy-where-beef-ad-30-years-004259251. doing someone else.” The feisty every- others have used it as well to describe html. woman authenticity that Peller brought promises unfulfilled. Theoretical phys- Richardson, Bill. 2014. Richardson Says Susana to the part is surely part of its appeal, as icist and science popularizer Michio is all bun, no burger. ABQ Free Press (July 2): 10. is the simplicity and directness of the Kaku invoked the phrase on Septem- Riney, Hal. 2009. Quoted in Art & Copy docu- line (which was originally “Where’s all ber 12, 2011, in an ABC Nightly News mentary film, directed by Doug Pray. Art & the beef?”). discussion about unfulfilled promises Industry productions. Skeptical Inquirer | March/April 2015 37.
Recommended publications
  • CFI-Annual-Report-2018.Pdf
    Message from the President and CEO Last year was another banner year for the Center the interests of people who embrace reason, for Inquiry. We worked our secular magic in a science, and humanism—the principles of the vast variety of ways: from saving lives of secular Enlightenment. activists around the world who are threatened It is no secret that these powerful ideas like with violence and persecution to taking the no others have advanced humankind by nation’s largest drugstore chain, CVS, to court unlocking human potential, promoting goodness, for marketing homeopathic snake oil as if it’s real and exposing the true nature of reality. If you medicine. are looking for humanity’s true salvation, CFI stands up for reason and science in a way no look no further. other organization in the country does, because This past year we sought to export those ideas to we promote secular and humanist values as well places where they have yet to penetrate. as scientific skepticism and critical thinking. The Translations Project has taken the influential But you likely already know that if you are reading evolutionary biology and atheism books of this report, as it is designed with our supporters in Richard Dawkins and translated them into four mind. We want you not only to be informed about languages dominant in the Muslim world: Arabic, where your investment is going; we want you to Urdu, Indonesian, and Farsi. They are available for take pride in what we have achieved together. free download on a special website. It is just one When I meet people who are not familiar with CFI, of many such projects aimed at educating people they often ask what it is we do.
    [Show full text]
  • Qanon • 75 Years of the Bomb • Vaccine History • Raising
    SQANON • K75 YEARS OF ETHE BOMB P• VACCINE HISTORYT • RAISINGI CTHE DEAD? Extraordinary Claims, Revolutionary Ideas & the Promotion of Science—Vol.25Science—Vol.25 No.4No.4 2020 $6.95 USA and Canada www.skeptic.com • WHAT IS QANON? • HOW QANON RECYCLES CENTURIES-OLD CONSPIRACY BELIEFS • HOW QANON HURTS THEIR OWN CAUSE • QANON IN CONSPIRATORIAL CONTEXT watch or listen for free Hear leading scientists, scholars, and thinkers discuss the most important issues of our time. Hosted by Michael Shermer. #146 Dr. DonalD Prothero— # 130 Dr. DeBra Soh—the end # 113 Dave ruBIn— # 106 Dr. DanIel ChIrot— Weird earth: Debunking Strange of Gender: Debunking the Myths Don’t Burn this Book: you Say you Want a revolution? Ideas about our Planet about Sex & Identity in our Society thinking for yourself in an radical Idealism and its tragic age of unreason Consequences #145 GreG lukIanoff—Mighty # 129 Dr. Mona Sue WeISSMark Ira: the aClu’s controversial involve- —the Science of Diversity # 112 ann Druyan—Cosmos: # 105 Dr. DIana PaSulka— ment in the Skokie case of 1977. Possible Worlds. how science and american Cosmic: ufos, # 128 MIChael ShellenBerGer civilization grew up together religion, and technology #144 Dr. aGuStIn fuenteS— —apocalypse never: Why environ- Why We Believe: evolution and the mental alarmism hurts us all human Way of Being # 127 Dr. WIllIaM Perry and #143 Dr. nICholaS ChrIStakIS— toM CollIna—the Button: the apollo’s arrow: the Profound and new nuclear arms race and Presi- enduring Impact of Coronavirus on dential Power from truman to trump the Way We live # 126 Sarah SColeS—they are #142 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • JSE 274 Online.Indd
    JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC EXPLORATION A Publication of the Society for Scientifi c Exploration (ISSN 0892-3310) Editorial Offi ce: Journal of Scientifi c Exploration, Society for Scientifi c Exploration, Kathleen E. Erickson, JSE Managing Editor, 151 Petaluma Blvd. So., #301, Petaluma, CA 94952 USA [email protected], 1-415-435-1604, (fax 1-707-559-5030) Manuscript Submission: Submit manuscripts online at http://journalofscientifi cexploration.org/ index.php/jse/login Editor-in-Chief: Stephen E. Braude, University of Maryland Baltimore County Book Review Editor: P. D. Moncrief ([email protected]) Managing Editor: Kathleen E. Erickson, Petaluma, CA Assistant Managing Editor and Copyeditor: Eve E. Blasband, Larkspur, CA Assistant Managing Editor and Proofreader: Elissa Hoeger, Princeton, NJ Associate Editors Carlos S. Alvarado, Th e Rhine Research Center, Chapel Hill, NC Daryl Bem, Ph.D., Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Robert Bobrow, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY Courtney Brown, Emory University, Alanta, GA Etzel Cardeña, Lund University, Sweden Jeremy Drake, Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA Bernard Haisch, Digital Universe Foundation, USA Michael Ibison, Institute for Advanced Studies, Austin, TX Roger D. Nelson, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ Mark Rodeghier, Center for UFO Studies, Chicago, IL S. James P. Spottiswoode, Los Angeles, CA Michael Sudduth, San Francisco State University, CA Society for Scientifi c Exploration Website — http://www.scientifi cexploration.org Chair, Publications Committee: Robert G. Jahn, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ Editorial Board Chair, Prof. Richard C. Henry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD Dr. Mikel Aickin, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ Dr. Steven J. Dick, U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, DC Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Beastly Fakes ‘Sasquatch’ Tracks — the Book Could Justi- Fiably Have Been a Compilation of Mockery and Humour
    followed by other people faking evidence, until a self-reinforcing legend is established. As more monster hunters flock to find the beast, more dubious evidence is generated. Before you know it, there is a souvenir shop POPPERFOTO/GETTY POPPERFOTO/GETTY selling T-shirts. Yet it is the hunters — ranging from out- right rogues to serious, if misguided, research- ers — who make this a gripping read. For instance, Bernard Heuvelmans, referenced as the founder of modern cryptozoology, earned a doctorate studying aardvark teeth, worked as a jazz musician and comedian, escaped from the Nazis and befriended Tintin creator Georges Prosper Remi (known by the pen- name ‘Hergé’) before producing his work on “What cryptids of all kinds. emerges is On a 1958 expedi- a never less tion to Tibet to seek than rigorous the yeti (a kind of examination Himalayan Bigfoot), of the led by Texas oil baron evidence.” Tom Slick, some members of the group allegedly performed sleight of hand on a sacred relic, swapping human finger bones for purported yeti A purported yeti footprint from the Menlung Basin in Nepal. bones. The stolen bones were reportedly smuggled out of the country in the luggage CRYPTOZOOLOGY of actor James Stewart. Going by these and other anecdotes in Abominable Science! — such as people strapping on fake wooden feet to create Beastly fakes ‘Sasquatch’ tracks — the book could justi- fiably have been a compilation of mockery and humour. In fact, it is a sensitive but Daniel Cressey delves into a sceptics’ history of devastating takedown of an entire subcul- monster hunters and their mythical quarry.
    [Show full text]
  • O Que É O Cepticismo? Respostas Simples Para Algumas Questões Frequentes
    O que é o Cepticismo? Respostas Simples Para Algumas Questões Frequentes Adaptado de: The Media Guide to Skepticism Objectivo: Providenciar um guia claro e de fácil leitura sobre o ponto-de-vista “céptico” subscrito por muitos que podem chamar-se a si mesmos de cépticos ou pensadores críticos; para distinguir o cepticismo prático do uso popular da frase “eu sou céptico” e daqueles que afirmam ser “cépticos” de alguma conclusão científica bem-estabelecida (como as alterações climáticas). O que é o cepticismo? O cepticismo é uma abordagem usada para avaliar alegações que enfatiza as provas e aplica as ferramentas da ciência. O cepticismo é mais frequentemente aplicado a alegações extraordinárias – aquelas que contrariam a visão consensual actual. O processo céptico considera as provas obtidas por observação sistemática e pela razão. A conclusão a que se chega no fim deste processo céptico é provisória porque podem surgir posteriormente provas adicionais ou melhores que apontem para outra explicação mais adequada. Exemplo: O Sr. X diz-nos que um novo comprimido melhorou bastante a sua memória. Esta alegação, se for verdade, é importante e extraordinária. Desta forma, seria apropriado aplicar o cepticismo à mesma. Nós quereríamos ver as provas de que a sua memória melhorou e que o comprimido foi responsável por isso. Nós consideramos também explicações alternativas que possam explicar por que o Sr. X diria que o novo comprimido melhora a sua memória: ele pode estar enganado, pode estar a atravessar um período menos stressante, ele quer sentir que gastou o seu dinheiro nos comprimidos de forma sensata, ele foi pago para promover os comprimidos, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters to the Editor
    SI March April 2010 pgs_SI J A 2009 1/27/10 10:48 AM Page 63 L E T T E R S T O T H E E D I T O R could hardly be enthralled by the prospect of the worth of items. receiving a text message that read, “OMG!!! U The other day my wife came across a pro- RASKEPTIC!!! AWESOME!!!” Since I don’t even gram on the A&E channel called Extreme have a cell phone, let alone a Blackberry, this Paranormal. Perhaps we need to counter that won’t happen. I fully realize that serious with a program called Extreme Skeptic! devices such as computers, mine included, David W. Briggs are often used for frivolous purposes. Still it [email protected] is difficult for me to envision serious scien- tific investigations being bandied about on cell phones and YouTube. Heidi Anderson’s article “Skeptical Parent - I am also concerned about quality. There is no law that states that the product of ing: Raising Young Critical Thinkers” should quantity and quality is a constant, but it raise a red flag for skeptics. In discussing the often works that way, alas. I thus can only be decision to have children, she quotes a skep- concerned that so-called skeptical investiga- tic who “admits that choosing to have a child tions will be half-baked and injurious to the was a ‘bit of a leap of faith,’ an approach for- health of the skeptical movement. Scientific eign to many skeptics.” She goes on to list investigations are able to dispel rumor and reasons for remaining childless.
    [Show full text]
  • CFI Calls on FDA to Label Homeopathic Drugs As Untested and Unproven
    [ NEWS AND COMMENT CFI Calls on FDA to Label Homeopathic Drugs as Untested and Unproven Consumers spend $3 billion a year on homeopathic drugs, yet most remain unaware that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not evalu- ated them for safety and effectiveness. In comments filed with the FDA the week of August 17, the Center for Inquiry (CFI) urged the FDA to sub- ject homeopathic drugs to the same testing requirements as conventional drugs. Failing that, CFI urged the FDA to at least require homeopathic prod- ucts to be clearly labeled as untested and unproven. Homeopathy is a centuries-old pseudoscience, developed before the discovery of disease-causing pathogens, based on the false beliefs that “like cures like” and that the more an ingredient is diluted the more potent it is, due to water’s “memory” of the diluted ingre- for not distinguishing between effec- tive remedies and pseudoscience Homeopathy is a centuries-old dient. As CFI stated in its comments, from the 1700s if both products “By its own definition, homeopathy share the same store shelves, and pseudoscience, developed cannot work.” Yet for historical reasons there is no labeling on homeopathic relating to the passage of the original drugs to indicate they are given a before the discovery of Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in 1938 pass by the FDA. Clear labeling on disease-causing pathogens. (which had a homeopathic practitioner homeopathic products, that catches consumers’ attention and informs as a key sponsor), homeopathic prod- them that the FDA does not evalu- can result in people becoming sicker or ucts can be marketed even though they ate these products for safety or effec- even dying for lack of real, scientifically are not subject to the rigorous testing tiveness, is an easy way to ensure that for safety and effectiveness that conven- people looking to treat their illnesses proven treatments.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Why-Is-There-A-Skeptical-Movement.Pdf, 66
    URI GELLER AND THE RECEPTION OF PARAPSYCHOLOGY IN THE 1970S by JACOB OLDER GREEN B.A. The University of Chicago, 2009 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (History) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) July, 2018 © Jacob Older Green, 2018 The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, the thesis entitled: URI GELLER AND THE RECEPTION OF PARAPSYCHOLOGY IN THE 1970S submitted by Jacob Older Green in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Examining Committee: Joy Dixon, History Supervisor Robert Brain, History Supervisory Committee Member Alexei Kojevnikov Additional Examiner ii Abstract This paper investigates the controversy following the publication of work by scientists working at the Stanford Research Institute that claimed to show that the extraordinary mental powers of 1970s super psychic Uri Geller were real. The thesis argues that the controversy around Geller represented a shift in how skeptical scientists treated parapsychology. Instead of engaging with parapsychology and treating it as an incipient, if unpromising scientific discipline, which had been the norm since the pioneering work of J.B. Rhine in the 1930s, parapsychology's critics portrayed the discipline as a pseudoscience, little more than an attempt by credulous scientists to confirm their superstitious belief in occult psychic powers. The controversy around Geller also led to the creation of The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP), one of the first skeptical organizations specializing in investigating supposed instances of paranormal phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • Goodbye to All That the Cultural Causes — and Fallout — of Climate Change
    S Nessie & otherALEM delusions Map mysteries • Procreating morally • Arctic Rangers A RNO A K LATON OPECKY & $6.50 Vol. 21, No. 10 December 2013 Stephen Henighan Goodbye to all that The cultural causes — and fallout — of climate change ALSO IN THIS ISSUE John English The Ignatieff phenomenon Beth Haddon 100 years of Canadian Press Mark Fried Jeffrey Sachs’s African folly Publications Mail Agreement #40032362 Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to PLUS: LRC, Circulation Dept. PO Box 8, Station K NON-FICTION Melanie Adrian on “Canadian values” and Muslim realities + Trevor Herriot Toronto, ON M4P 2G1 on returning to nature + David Homel on Sheila Fischman and the politics of translation + J.J. Lee on Chinese family albums + Kevin Sylvester on Can-Am football FICTION Steven Hayward reviews Kicking the Sky by Anthony De Sa + Larry Krotz reviews The Strength of Bone by Lucie Wilk and My Heart Is Not My Own by Michael Wuitchik POETRY Sue Chenette + Mary Rykov + Naomi Beth Wakan + Crystal Hurdle UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY PRESS Greening the Maple: Marion Nicoll: Canadian Ecocriticism Silence and Alchemy in Context Ann Davis and Elizabeth Herbert Edited by Ella Soper and With Jennifer Salahub and Christine Sowiak Nicholas Bradley 150 pp, $39.95, illustrations 624 pp, $44.95 9781552387078 9781552385463 “Devotees of Canadian art know Canadian landscapes and their something about Marion Nicoll, her apparent distinctiveness have iconic paintings and prints are found fascinated writers and critics in most public collections, she is throughout the history of literature in mentioned in almost every Canadian Canada. This volume surveys the rise art history text….
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report
    PROGRESS 2016 REPORT Message from the President and CEO This aptly named Progress Report gives you a sense of the Cen- CFI’s efforts to stand up for secular people here and abroad were ter for Inquiry’s incredible ambition and range of endeavors to particularly active in 2016. As a multi-year project, we have been promote reason and science. From our two flagship magazines, Free challenging the exclusion of secular celebrants from those who Inquiry and Skeptical Inquirer, to our work defending secular activists may solemnize marriages. In too many states, religious leaders are around the world at the United Nations Human Rights Council, automatically given the right to solemnize marriages alongside cer- CFI is working to bring the values of the Enlightenment—critical tain public officials, while secular celebrants are excluded. In 2014 thinking, scientific literacy, humanism, and individual freedom—to we won a lawsuit against Indiana’s exclusion, and just at the start the 21st century. of 2017, we heard the good news that an Illinois judge opened the way for secular celebrants there as well. The big news for CFI is that we have formally merged with the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason & Science (RDFRS). Another notable CFI victory was the crackdown by the Federal Throughout 2016, the two organizations worked hand-in-glove. Trade Commission on the marketing of homeopathy, something Now, we are one, with RDFRS becoming a division of CFI, CFI had urged in formal testimony. Hopefully this will put a dent and the RDFRS board, including Richard Dawkins, joining the in the $3 billion a year that Americans spend on this consumer CFI board.
    [Show full text]
  • Religionversus Real Medicine
    SKEPTICISM . SCIENCE . SOCIETY Vol. 34, No 1. March 2014 Religion versus Real Medicine +Simon Says Dolphins Activism Belief Australian Skeptics . www.skeptics.com.au Skeptic_Cover_Mar14.indd 1 4/03/14 10:39 AM The Skeptic March 14 Skeptical Groups in Australia Australian Skeptics Inc – Richard Saunders Gold Coast Skeptics – Lilian Derrick www.skeptics.com.au PO Box 8348, GCMC Bundall, QLD 9726 PO Box 20, Beecroft, NSW 2119 Tel: (07) 5593 1882; Fax: (07) 5593 2776 Tel: 02 8094 1894; Mob: 0432 713 195; Fax: (02) 8088 4735 [email protected] [email protected] Contact Lilian to find out news of more events. Sydney Skeptics in the Pub – 6pm first Thursday of each month at the Mezz Bar, Coronation Hotel, Park St in the city (meeting upstairs) Canberra Skeptics – Lauren Cochrane PO Box 555, Civic Square ACT 2608 Dinner meetings are held on a regular basis. http://www.canberraskeptics.org.au Tel: 0408 430 442 March 29 dinner - Ketan Joshi, Technophobia [email protected] (general inquiries), 2014 convention - November 28-30. Details and speakers tba. [email protected] (Canberra Skeptics in the Pub). A free monthly talk, open to the public, usually takes place on the 1st Saturday of each month at the Lecture Theatre, Hunter Skeptics – John Turner CSIRO Discovery Centre, Clunies Ross Rd (check website for Tel: (02) 4959 6286 [email protected] details of the current month’s talk). Skeptics in the Pub gather at 1pm on the third Sunday of each month at King O’Malleys Meetings are held upstairs at The Cricketers Arms Hotel, Cooks Pub in Civic.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Guide to Skepticism
    Media Guide to Skepticism Purpose: To provide a clear, easy-to-read guide about the “Skeptical” viewpoint as subscribed to by many who might call themselves Skeptics or critical thinkers; to distinguish practical Skepticism from the popular use of the phrase “I’m skeptical,” and from those who claim to be “skeptics” regarding some well-established conclusion (such as climate change). What is skepticism? Skepticism is an approach to evaluating claims that emphasizes evidence and applies tools of science. Skepticism is most often applied to extraordinary claims – those that refute the current consensus view. The Skeptical process considers evidence obtained by systematic observations and reason. The conclusion that is reached at the end of this Skeptical process is provisional because additional or better evidence may come along that points towards a more suitable explanation. Example: Mr. X tells us that a new pill greatly improves his memory. This claim, if true, is important and extraordinary. So, it would be fitting to apply Skepticism to this claim. We would want to see evidence that his memory is improved and that the pill was responsible for that. We consider alternative explanations that could explain why Mr. X would say the new pill improves his memory: he may be mistaken, he might be going through a less-stressful time of life, he wants to feel like he spent his money wisely on the pills, he was paid to promote the pills, etc. Good evidence that his claim has validity would be quality research results (multiple studies) that show many who take the pill displayed a measurable improvement in memory.
    [Show full text]