Florida Grasshopper Sparrow Disease Risk Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Florida Grasshopper Sparrow Disease Risk Analysis Florida Grasshopper Sparrow Disease Risk Analysis November, 2018 Florida Grasshopper Sparrow Disease Risk Analysis 28 – 29 November, 2018 White Oak Conservation Yulee, FL Workshop Report 9 April, 2019 Workshop Organization White Oak Conservation Workshop Design and Facilitation IUCN/SSC Conservation Planning Specialist Group Workshop Support United States Fish and Wildlife Service Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission White Oak Conservation Cover photo: Christina Evans A contribution of the IUCN/SSC Conservation Planning Specialist Group, in collaboration with White Oak Conservation, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and workshop participants. Workshop support provided by United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and White Oak Conservation. IUCN encourage meetings, workshops and other forums for the consideration and analysis of issues related to conservation, and believe that reports of these meetings are most useful when broadly disseminated. The opinions and recommendations expressed in this report reflect the issues discussed and ideas expressed by the participants in the workshop and do not necessarily reflect the formal policies IUCN, its Commissions, its Secretariat or its members. © Copyright CPSG 2019 Suggested Citation: IUCN CPSG. 2019. Florida Grasshopper Sparrow Disease Risk Analysis: Workshop Report. 9 April 2019. Apple Valley, MN: IUCN SSC Conservation Planning Specialist Group. Workshop Report Florida Grasshopper Sparrow Disease Risk Analysis 9 April 2019 Florida Grasshopper Sparrow Disease Risk Analysis 28 – 29 November, 2018 White Oak Conservation Yulee, FL Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... i Florida Grasshopper Sparrow Disease Risk Analysis: Project History, Iterative Workshop Process, and Expectations......................................................1 A Short Summary of Programmatic Pathogen Control Efforts .............................................................. 1 Risk Analysis: An Iterative, Adaptive Process ....................................................................................... 3 Key Concepts of Disease Risk Analysis ................................................................................................ 4 Method Used to Conduct this DRA........................................................................................................ 5 DRA Context .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Problem Description ........................................................................................................................8 Acceptable Risk ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Hazard Identification .......................................................................................................................9 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 9 List of Relevant Hazards ...................................................................................................................... 10 Hazard Assessment Criteria ................................................................................................................. 11 Hazard Assessment ............................................................................................................................... 11 Hazard Assessment Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................... 14 Risk Assessment for Priority Hazards ...........................................................................................15 Risk Assessment: Filarid Nematodes ................................................................................................... 15 Risk Assessment: Coccidian Protozoa ................................................................................................. 15 Risk Assessment: Transfer Pathway Analysis...................................................................................... 16 Discussion of management alternatives ........................................................................................................ 19 Filarid nematode treatment ............................................................................................................................ 19 Coccidian protozoa treatment ........................................................................................................................ 20 Duration of “quarantine and isolation” .......................................................................................................... 20 Post-release monitoring ................................................................................................................................. 22 A Preliminary Analysis of Further Research Needs ......................................................................23 Preliminary Conclusions from This Analysis ................................................................................23 References ......................................................................................................................................25 Workshop Report Florida Grasshopper Sparrow Disease Risk Analysis 9 April 2019 Appendices .....................................................................................................................................27 Appendix I: List of Workshop Participants ....................................................................................... 27 Appendix II: Comments from Disease Experts Regarding Pre-Release Health Screening and Quarantine for Florida Grasshopper Sparrows .............................................................. 29 Appendix III: A Literature Review of pathogens that may cause morbidity or mortality in the critically endangered Florida Grasshopper Sparrow ..................................................... 45 Appendix IV: Data Summary Presentations from Workshop .............................................................. 59 Appendix V: Documents and literature provided to participants in advance of the Disease Risk Assessment Workshop ................................................................................................... 75 Appendix VI: Florida Grasshopper Sparrow 5-Year Strategic Vision (Second Draft – Last Update 26 November 2018) ........................................................ 77 Appendix VII: Workshop Participant Dissenting Statement ............................................................... 131 Workshop Report Florida Grasshopper Sparrow Disease Risk Analysis 9 April 2019 Florida Grasshopper Sparrow Disease Risk Analysis Executive Summary Introduction The Florida grasshopper sparrow (Ammodramus savannarum floridanus, FGSP) is a non-migratory subspecies endemic to dry prairie habitats of south-central Florida. It has been listed as state endangered since 1977 and federally endangered since 1986. Populations have declined at all three major documented breeding sites on public land, including Three Lakes Wildlife Management Area, Kissimmee Prairie Preserve State Park, and Avon Park Air Force Range. The primary causes of this decline have not been fully identified, but known and potential threats to the species include: habitat loss, altered fire regimes, altered hydrology, grazing and land use effects, increased predation pressure, and introduced species. If the Florida grasshopper sparrow continues to decline, it may become extinct in less than a decade. Disease is perceived to be a potential threat to the continued survival of wild FGSPs, although little is known about the prevalence and intensity of parasites and other pathogens that might affect them. There is some existing evidence regarding the disease threat – parasites that have been found in free-ranging FGSPs include ectoparasites (ticks, feather lice, and feather mites), helminths (Mediorhynchus papillosum and an unidentified microfilaria), unidentified fecal coccidia (probably Isospora sp.), hemoparasites (Plasmodium sp., Leucocytozoon sp., and Trypanosoma sp.), tick-borne hemobacteria (Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Rickettsia aeschlimannii, the latter found only from the gut of ticks that fed on FGSP), and mycobacteriosis (Mycobacterium avium). The FGSP captive-breeding program began in 2015 at the Rare Species Conservatory Foundation (RSCF) and in 2016 at White Oak Conservation (WOC) to assist with species recovery. A higher-than-acceptable rate of morbidity and mortality occurred among captive birds during the 2016 and 2017 breeding seasons due to management, nutrition, and disease-related issues. Disease is a common problem in many captive bird populations due to higher densities and stress of birds in captivity. Therefore, steps were immediately taken to identify and manage disease in the captive facilities. Changes in husbandry practices led to a significant reduction in disease in the captive Florida grasshopper sparrow flocks, and no disease-related deaths were reported in 2018. From the management group’s perspective, the most pressing infectious disease concerns affecting the captive population (and thus
Recommended publications
  • Grasshopper Sparrow,Ammodramus Savannarum Pratensis
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Grasshopper Sparrow Ammodramus savannarum pratensis pratensis subspecies (Ammodramus savannarum pratensis) in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2013 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2013. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Grasshopper Sparrow pratensis subspecies Ammodramus savannarum pratensis in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. ix + 36 pp. (www.registrelep- sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC acknowledges Carl Savignac for writing the status report on the Grasshopper Sparrow pratensis subspecies, Ammodramus savannarum pratensis in Canada, prepared with the financial support of Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Marty Leonard, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Birds Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le Bruant sauterelle de la sous- espèce de l’Est (Ammodramus savannarum pratensis) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Grasshopper Sparrow pratensis subspecies — photo by Jacques Bouvier. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2014. Catalogue No. CW69-14/681-2014E-PDF ISBN 978-1-100-23548-6 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2013 Common name Grasshopper Sparrow - pratensis subspecies Scientific name Ammodramus savannarum pratensis Status Special Concern Reason for designation In Canada, this grassland bird is restricted to southern Ontario and southwestern Quebec.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Structured Decision Making to Prioritize Species Assemblages for Conservation T ⁎ Adam W
    Journal for Nature Conservation 45 (2018) 48–57 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal for Nature Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jnc Using Structured Decision Making to prioritize species assemblages for conservation T ⁎ Adam W. Greena, , Maureen D. Corrella, T. Luke Georgea, Ian Davidsonb, Seth Gallagherc, Chris Westc, Annamarie Lopatab, Daniel Caseyd, Kevin Ellisone, David C. Pavlacky Jr.a, Laura Quattrinia, Allison E. Shawa, Erin H. Strassera, Tammy VerCauterena, Arvind O. Panjabia a Bird Conservancy of the Rockies, 230 Cherry St., Suite 150, Fort Collins, CO, 80521, USA b National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, 1133 15th St NW #1100, Washington, DC, 20005, USA c National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, 44 Cook St, Suite 100, Denver, CO, 80206, USA d Northern Great Plains Joint Venture, 3302 4th Ave. N, Billings, MT, 59101, USA e World Wildlife Fund, Northern Great Plains Program, 13 S. Willson Ave., Bozeman, MT, 59715, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Species prioritization efforts are a common strategy implemented to efficiently and effectively apply con- Conservation planning servation efforts and allocate resources to address global declines in biodiversity. These structured processes help Grasslands identify species that best represent the entire species community; however, these methods are often subjective Priority species and focus on a limited number of species characteristics. We developed an objective, transparent approach using Prioritization a Structured Decision Making (SDM) framework to identify a group of grassland bird species on which to focus Structured decision making conservation efforts that considers biological, social, and logistical criteria in the Northern Great Plains of North America. The process quantified these criteria to ensure representation of a variety of species and habitats and included the relative value of each criterion to the working group.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence in Corvids and Apes: a Case of Convergent Evolution? Amanda Seed*, Nathan Emery & Nicola Claytonà
    Ethology CURRENT ISSUES – PERSPECTIVES AND REVIEWS Intelligence in Corvids and Apes: A Case of Convergent Evolution? Amanda Seed*, Nathan Emery & Nicola Claytonà * Department of Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany School of Biological & Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK à Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Invited Review) Correspondence Abstract Nicola Clayton, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Intelligence is suggested to have evolved in primates in response to com- Street, Cambridge CB23EB, UK. plexities in the environment faced by their ancestors. Corvids, a large- E-mail: [email protected] brained group of birds, have been suggested to have undergone a con- vergent evolution of intelligence [Emery & Clayton (2004) Science, Vol. Received: November 13, 2008 306, pp. 1903–1907]. Here we review evidence for the proposal from Initial acceptance: December 26, 2008 both ultimate and proximate perspectives. While we show that many of Final acceptance: February 15, 2009 (M. Taborsky) the proposed hypotheses for the evolutionary origin of great ape intelli- gence also apply to corvids, further study is needed to reveal the selec- doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01644.x tive pressures that resulted in the evolution of intelligent behaviour in both corvids and apes. For comparative proximate analyses we empha- size the need to be explicit about the level of analysis to reveal the type of convergence that has taken place. Although there is evidence that corvids and apes solve social and physical problems with similar speed and flexibility, there is a great deal more to be learned about the repre- sentations and algorithms underpinning these computations in both groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Scrub-Jays
    SCIENCE in the SCRUB At Home in the Florida Scrub Archbold Biological Station LENGTH Module 1: Florida Scrub-Jays: 1 hour prep 20 minute video At Home in the Florida Scrub 30 minute activity By the Archbold Biological Station Education Department, 2014 with support from the Southwest Florida Water Management District MATERIALS At a Glance In this lesson, students learn how Florida Scrub-Jays have adapted to survive in the Video Florida scrub ecosystem, and how scientists use banding and long-term research to Jay Family jpeg understand and protect this endangered species. Students watch a video, then Printouts work in pairs to identify parts of the Florida Scrub-Jay’s family life. Tape or Glue Pens or pencils Directions 1. Watch “At Home in the Florida Scrub” video. 2. Review concepts from video with questions about Scrub-Jay habits, cooperative breeding, and the graph shown in the video. Questions supplied on next page. KEY VOCABULARY 3. Divide students into pairs for The Bird Search Story narrative game. Dense Oak Scrub Learning Goals Ecosystems • Florida Scrub-Jays have very specific needs and require scrub habitat. Empirical • Some animals, such as Florida Scrub-Jays, live in family groups, headed by a Food Chains breeding pair, with members that help each other. This adaptation of behavior Habitat is called cooperative breeding and has specific advantages. Interdependence • Cooperative breeding evolved in scrub-jays because: 1) scrub habitat and Scrub Habitat resources were limited, forcing scrub-jays to cooperate 2) individual scrub-jays Thicket benefited from helping their siblings so were more successful when raising their own young (experience matters) and 3) scrub-jay families were stronger when siblings helped and more young birds survived.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • A Fossil Scrub-Jay Supports a Recent Systematic Decision
    THE CONDOR A JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY Volume 98 Number 4 November 1996 .L The Condor 98~575-680 * +A. 0 The Cooper Omithological Society 1996 g ’ b.1 ;,. ’ ’ “I\), / *rs‘ A FOSSIL SCRUB-JAY SUPPORTS A”kECENT ’ js.< SYSTEMATIC DECISION’ . :. ” , ., f .. STEVEN D. EMSLIE : +, “, ., ! ’ Department of Sciences,Western State College,Gunnison, CO 81231, ._ e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Nine fossil premaxillae and mandibles of the Florida Scrub-Jay(Aphelocoma coerulescens)are reported from a late Pliocene sinkhole deposit at Inglis 1A, Citrus County, Florida. Vertebrate biochronologyplaces the site within the latestPliocene (2.0 to 1.6 million yearsago, Ma) and more specificallyat 2.0 l-l .87 Ma. The fossilsare similar in morphology to living Florida Scrub-Jaysin showing a relatively shorter and broader bill compared to western species,a presumed derived characterfor the Florida species.The recent elevation of the Florida Scrub-Jayto speciesrank is supported by these fossils by documenting the antiquity of the speciesand its distinct bill morphology in Florida. Key words: Florida; Scrub-Jay;fossil; late Pliocene. INTRODUCTION represent the earliest fossil occurrenceof the ge- nus Aphelocomaand provide additional support Recently, the Florida Scrub-Jay (Aphelocoma for the recognition ofA. coerulescensas a distinct, coerulescens) has been elevated to speciesrank endemic specieswith a long fossil history in Flor- with the Island Scrub-Jay(A. insularis) from Santa ida. This record also supports the hypothesis of Cruz Island, California, and the Western Scrub- Pitelka (195 1) that living speciesof Aphefocoma Jay (A. californica) in the western U. S. and Mex- arose in the Pliocene. ico (AOU 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • The Gambia: a Taste of Africa, November 2017
    Tropical Birding - Trip Report The Gambia: A Taste of Africa, November 2017 A Tropical Birding “Chilled” SET DEPARTURE tour The Gambia A Taste of Africa Just Six Hours Away From The UK November 2017 TOUR LEADERS: Alan Davies and Iain Campbell Report by Alan Davies Photos by Iain Campbell Egyptian Plover. The main target for most people on the tour www.tropicalbirding.com +1-409-515-9110 [email protected] p.1 Tropical Birding - Trip Report The Gambia: A Taste of Africa, November 2017 Red-throated Bee-eaters We arrived in the capital of The Gambia, Banjul, early evening just as the light was fading. Our flight in from the UK was delayed so no time for any real birding on this first day of our “Chilled Birding Tour”. Our local guide Tijan and our ground crew met us at the airport. We piled into Tijan’s well used minibus as Little Swifts and Yellow-billed Kites flew above us. A short drive took us to our lovely small boutique hotel complete with pool and lovely private gardens, we were going to enjoy staying here. Having settled in we all met up for a pre-dinner drink in the warmth of an African evening. The food was delicious, and we chatted excitedly about the birds that lay ahead on this nine- day trip to The Gambia, the first time in West Africa for all our guests. At first light we were exploring the gardens of the hotel and enjoying the warmth after leaving the chilly UK behind. Both Red-eyed and Laughing Doves were easy to see and a flash of colour announced the arrival of our first Beautiful Sunbird, this tiny gem certainly lived up to its name! A bird flew in landing in a fig tree and again our jaws dropped, a Yellow-crowned Gonolek what a beauty! Shocking red below, black above with a daffodil yellow crown, we were loving Gambian birds already.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Assessment for Grasshopper Sparrow
    Species Status Assessment Class: Birds Family: Emberizidae Scientific Name: Ammodramus savannarum Common Name: Grasshopper sparrow Species synopsis: Four subspecies of grasshopper sparrow occur in North America. This is a sparrow of open grasslands and prairies with habitats containing more shrubs utilized in the southwest (Vickery 1996). As a grassland bird, the grasshopper sparrow is one of the most severely declining species in New York. Breeding Bird Atlas data shows a decline of 42% between the two Atlas periods, 1980-85 to 2000-05. BBS data show significant long-term and short term declines in the state and in the Eastern BBS region. Areas of concentration include the Finger Lakes region, the central portion of the Southern Tier, and Jefferson County. It is sparsely distributed across the Mohawk Valley and persists in the eastern Suffolk County barrens habitat on Long Island (Smith 2008). I. Status a. Current Legal Protected Status i. Federal _____Not Listed________________________ Candidate: __No__ ii. New York _____Special Concern; SGCN__________________________________ b. Natural Heritage Program Rank i. Global _____G5________________________________________________________ ii. New York _____S3_______________________ Tracked by NYNHP? _No__ Other Rank: New York Natural Heritage Program Watch List Partners in Flight: Species of Continental Importance 1 Status Discussion: The grasshopper sparrow is a fairly common but local breeder on eastern Long Island and in interior lowlands of the Appalachian Plateau and the Great Lakes Plain. It is absent from Alleghenies, Adirondacks, Catskills. Declines noted between the first and second Breeding Bird Atlas projects have occurred in all regions of occurrence within the state. Grasshopper sparrow is ranked as Vulnerable, Imperiled, or Critically Imperiled in all northeastern states and provinces except in Pennsylvania and Ontario, where it is considered Apparently Secure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Following Reviews Express the Opinions of the Individual Reviewers Regarding the Strengths, Weaknesses, and Value of The
    REVIEWS EDITED BY M. ROSS LEIN Thefollowing reviews express the opinions of theindividual reviewers regarding the strengths, weaknesses, and value of thebooks they review. As such,they are subjective evaluations and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of theeditors or any officialpolicy of theA.O.U.--Eds. The Florida Scrub Jay: demographyof a cooper- geneticparents in the care of young that are not off- ative-breeding bird.--Glen E. Woolfenden and John spring of the helpers.To establishthat an individual W. Fitzpatrick. 1984. Princeton, New Jersey,Prince- is a helper, one must observeit caring for young that ton University Press. xiv + 406 pp., 1 color plate, are known not to be its own. There is no evidence many figures.ISBN 0-691-08366-5(cloth), 0-691-08367-3 in the chapter on procedures that Woolfenden and (paper).Cloth, $45.00;paper, $14.50.--For nearly two Fitzpatrick employed this criterion, although they decades three long-term studies of communally were aware of it (p. 4). Instead, throughout the book breeding birds, well known to readersof this review, jays are divided into breedersand helpers, implying have been in progress.The behavioral ecology of that if a bird is not a breeder it must be a helper these speciesis so complex that conclusionsreached ("Helpers are nonbreeders," p. 80). It is well known after only a few years of study can be quite mislead- for other speciesthat not all nonbreeders help, and ing. Eachnew year of studynot only enlargessample that individual nonbreedersvary significantlyin the sizesbut also provides insights that require impor- amount or intensity of their helping efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Scrub-Jay Game
    Around the Bend Nature Tours Field Study Florida Scrub‐Jay Game An Adaptation of Project WILD’s “How Many Bears Can Live in this Forest?” And the “Osprey Game” created by the Staff at Pelotes Island Nature Preserve, Jacksonville, Florida http://pelotes.jea.com/ Grade Level: 4th – 12th Grades Subject: Science Duration: 35 Minutes Materials: One set of Food Cards*, 21 Fledgling Cards, Optional: 7 nest markers (sturdy leaves) NGSSS: SC.3.N.1.1, SC.3.N.1.6, SC.4.L.17.2, SC.4.L.17.3, SC.4.L.17.4, SC.5.L.15.1, SC.5.L.17.1, SC.7.L.17.1, SC.7.L.17.2, SC.7.L.17.3, SC.912.L.17.6 C, SC.912.L.17.20 Overview: In this role-playing game, students become scrub jays and compete with man for their living space, see the effects of habitat loss, and deal with other natural obstacles. The purpose of this game is to give the players a better understanding and appreciation for the life and struggles of this unique and rare bird. Objectives: Students will discover how the Florida scrub jay lives in extended family units. Students will learn that the scrub jay diet consists mainly of acorns, but they are omnivorous birds. Students will understand that habitat restoration is critical to the survival of the scrub jay species. Background: See attached Florida Scrub Jay fact sheet. SETTING UP THE GAME: 1. Assemble the students in “Family Groups” of scrub jays. Each family group will have 2 adults (a mated pair) and 1-3 sub-adults.
    [Show full text]
  • Grasshopper Sparrow (Ammodramus Savannarum Ammolegus) “Arizona
    Grasshopper Sparrow (Ammodramus savannarum ammolegus) “Arizona Grasshopper Sparrow” NMPIF level: Species Conservation Concern, Level 1 (SC1) NMPIF assessment score: 20 NM stewardship responsibility: High New Mexico BCRs: 34 Primary breeding habitat(s): Chihuahuan Desert Grasslands (Ammodramus savannarum perpallidus) NMPIF level: Biodiversity Conservation Concern, Level 2 (BC2) NMPIF assessment score: 12 NM stewardship responsibility: Low National PIF status: Stewardship. New Mexico BCRs: 16, 18, 34, 35 (most in 18) Primary breeding habitat(s): Plains-Mesa Grasslands Other habitats used: Chihuahuan Desert Grasslands, Agricultural Summary of Concern Grasshopper Sparrow is a grassland species that has undergone large, long-term population declines in many areas. A . s. ammolegus is a subspecies restricted to a small area of the southwest United States and northern Mexico; the small New Mexico population has been declining. Other subspecies are locally present in suitable grassland areas in the east. These populations should be monitored for further declines. Associated Species Northern Harrier, Eastern Meadowlark Distribution One of twelve Grasshopper Sparrow subspecies, and one of four breeding in the United States, A. s. ammolegus breeds only in a very small area, including parts of southeast Arizona, southwest New Mexico, and north Sonora. The winter range of this taxon is poorly known; some A. s. ammolegus remain in the United States, others migrate to central Mexico and possibly south into Central America. In New Mexico, A. s. ammolegus is found only in the Animas and Playas valleys, in Hidalgo County (Phillips et al. 1978, Vickery 1996). A. s. perpallidus is broadly distributed across the west and Great Plains, from southern Canada to the Mexican border states.
    [Show full text]
  • Helminth Parasites of the Common Grackle Quiscalus Quiscula Versicolor Vieillot in Indiana
    This dissertation has been 62—3609 microfilmed exactly as received WELKER, George William, 1923- HELMINTH PARASITES OF THE COMMON GRACKLE QUISCALUS QUISCULA VERSICOLOR VIEILLOT IN INDIANA. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1962 Zoology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan HELMINTH PARASITES OP THE COMMON GRACKLE QUISCALU5 QUISCULA VERSICOLOR VIEILLOT IN INDIANA DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By George William Welker, B. S., M. A. u _ u u u The Ohio State University 1962 Approved by: 1'XJijdJi ~7 Adviser urtameenhtt of Zoology and Entomology Dedicated as a tribute of appreciation and admiration to ELLEN ANN, my wife, for her help and for the sacrifices which she made during the four years covered by this study. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to express his sincere appreciation for all the help and cooperation which he has received from many people during the course of this study: Dr. Joseph Jones, Jr. of St. Augustine's College, Raleigh, North Carolina; Dr. Donal Myer, Southern Illinois university; Dr. E. J. Robinson, Jr., Kenyon College, Gambier, Ohio; Dr. Martin J. Ulmer, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa; and Dr. A. Carter Broad and Dr. Carl Reese of the reading committee who helped in checking the paper for errors. Special acknowledgment goes to two persons whose help and influence are most deeply appreciated. To Professor Robert H. Cooper, Head of the Department of Science at Ball State Teachers College, whose sincere and continuous interest, encouragement and help made possible the completion of the work; and to Professor Joseph N.
    [Show full text]