Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) Addendum

LDF Evidence Base

March 2015

Contents

Section Title Page

1 Introduction 3

2 Updates to the IDP Schedules 4 Schedule 1 – Borough-wide Infrastructure 4 Schedule 2 – Horley Regeneration Infrastructure 10 Schedule 3 – Merstham Regeneration Infrastructure 11 Schedule 4 – Preston Regeneration Infrastructure 11 Schedule 5 – Redhill Regeneration Infrastructure 12

Annex 1 Organisations Consulted 14

Schedule 1 Borough-wide Infrastructure 15

Schedule 2 Horley Infrastructure 29

Schedule 3 Merstham Infrastructure 33

Schedule 4 Preston Infrastructure 34

Schedule 5 Redhill Infrastructure 35

1. Introduction

1.1 This Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) Addendum provides an update on the Council’s IDP (September 2012) document, which delivers an overview of provision for physical, social and green infrastructure, and an assessment of future needs, based on the levels of growth in the Council’s Core Strategy. At the time of the 2012 IDP, the Core Strategy was a Proposed Submission Document, but has since been adopted by the Council in July 2014. The Council has recently consulted on its Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule for the Community Infrastructure Levy (which ran to 12 January 2015). This Addendum has been prepared to support the Council’s Draft Charging Schedule, publication of which is anticipated in April 2015.

1.2 The schedules at the end of the IDP 2012 document, which set out in detail the individual projects and items of infrastructure that are considered to be both realistic and necessary to support growth, have been updated as part of this Addendum to ensure that the latest information on the various schemes is presented, and to capture any new projects or needs which have arisen. Where appropriate, additional commentary has been provided in Section 2 of this Addendum Report to accompany the updates to the schedules.

1.3 This work has been carried out in consultation with various infrastructure providers, as well as consultation with relevant departments within Reigate & Banstead Borough Council and Surrey County Council. A list of those consulted can be found at Annex 1. It should be noted that not all consultees responded, and therefore the Council has had to make some assumptions in updating the schedules. These are explaining in section 2 of this report.

1.4 The schedules contain the currently identified infrastructure requirements for the plan period to 2027. They represent the best knowledge at the time of writing, although it is recognised that needs and infrastructure providers’ plans are likely to change and evolve over the plan period. In particular, as the Council develops more specific proposals for site allocations (including sustainable urban extensions) through the Development Management Plan, specific infrastructure needs associated with these sites may arise. The IDP will therefore continue to be regularly updated as development and projects progress and evolve.

2. Updates to the IDP Schedules

Further commentary is provided in this section for the key updates to the infrastructure schedules since 2012.

SCHEDULE 1 – BOROUGH-WIDE INFRASTRUCTURE

General Physical & Social Infrastructure

Education

2.1 Surrey County Council as education authority maintains all public-sector schools in the borough. In order to monitor, anticipate and plan the educational requirements for each borough/district, SCC produces an annual School Organisations Plan, which covers a nine year forecasting period for each local authority area. Information has been taken from the latest report, dated April 2014, to provide progress on various schemes in Redhill East and Banstead/Tadworth.

2.2 Additional information has also been provided directly by SCC. This identifies the need for further school places to be provided in Horley, due to an increase in school pupil numbers related to new housing in the area, and in the Redhill/Reigate area, where schemes have already been progressed for additional primary forms of entry but additional provision will be required.

2.3 The funding gap figures provided for entries 1/2 – 1/5 in Schedule 1 are estimated amounts based on funds allocated to Surrey County Council from the Department of Education. SCC has an available allocation of £60M for the next 2 year financial period (i.e. 2015/16 and 2016/17), amounting to £30M per year. SCC has also been awarded an additional £41M in extra funding over the next two years from the DfE, due to a significant and unexpected increase in demand for school places, but a funding gap of more than £30M per year still remains (Surrey News website, 13th February 2015).

2.4 The additional funding of £41M has not been taken into account when calculating the funding gap column entries, as this amount is not guaranteed over the entire scheme delivery period. Thus it is estimated that SCC has a yearly funding gap of £50M (£41M divided by 2 (years) = approximately £20M plus existing funding gap of £30M) to £30M available funds. This ratio has been used against the cost for each education scheme to estimate the likely gaps in funding1.

1 The figures in the funding gap column therefore represent a discounted figure compared to the total identified cost. Whilst the funding gap figures are only an estimate, it is considered more realistic to take into account the fact that there is likely to be some base funding available to deliver the schools programme. 4

Flooding

2.5 Flood risk has been assessed on a comprehensive borough-wide basis through the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment prepared in December 2007 and updated in 2012. The Environment Agency has provided comments and information regarding the latest developments in the borough. Whilst the Environment Agency supports the SFRA approach adopted by RBBC, it highlights that the borough is also at significant risk from other sources of flooding; in particular, surface water flooding. The Agency has published maps of surface water flood risk.

2.6 For all other sources of flooding, Surrey County Council is the Lead Local Flood Authority. SCC has published a draft Surrey Local Flood Risk Management Strategy. The strategy seeks to provide an overview of the on-going flood risk management work underway across the county, and clarify the responsibilities of different organisations involved in flood risk management.

2.7 Localised flood events have occurred during the period since the 2012 IDP was produced. Horley suffered from flooding over winter 2013/14 in many locations, and from a number of different sources. Flooding also occurred in January 2015. The Environment Agency has made provision to address flood risk by making a number of bids for funding from Defra for Grant in Aid. Two related flood alleviation schemes are identified within the schedule for West Horley, and the Burstow River Catchment, to the south of Horley. The Environment Agency is working in conjunction with Surrey County Council and Reigate and Banstead Borough Council, to develop these schemes to provide further clarity over potential options and beneficiaries. As a consequence the Agency is currently advocating that no development should take place within flood zones 2 and 3 to ensure locations for potential flood risk interventions, i.e. flood storage areas are not compromised.

2.8 Redhill suffered from isolated surface water flooding during the winter 2013/14, and has historically suffered from fluvial flooding. The Redhill Brook is culverted through much of Redhill town centre and that, linked with the surface water drainage arrangements, presents the greatest risk to flooding. A scheme is presently being investigated to consider the potential to increase flood storage upstream of Redhill town centre, and further details of this project will be known by June 2015. This scheme is identified within the Redhill Regeneration Infrastructure Schedule No.5.

Transport

2.9 The entry updates in this particular section have been updated to take account of the Annex to the Reigate and Banstead Borough Draft Forward Programme, which accompanies the Surrey Transport Plan (Reigate and Banstead Local Transport Strategy), produced by Surrey County Council in September 2014. This programme was approved by the SCC Local Committee on 1 December 2014, subject to the prioritisation, feasibility assessment, and impact of measured, major schemes, and covers the period to around 2021. Surrey County Council has confirmed that there is no further information or progress on the schemes listed in the Draft Forward Programme, since its publication in September 2014.

2.10 Many of these schemes in the updated schedule were reported in the IDP 2012, however, they were in summary form, listed as ‘local area package of measures’, for each geographical area. In the current schedule, the previous summary entries have been broken down into detailed entries, for ease of identification for future progress updates on the IDP schedule.

2.11 A varied range of measures are proposed across the borough, along major routes comprising the A23 and A217, and in all of the borough town centres. These include highway improvements for traffic, improvements to pedestrian and cyclist routes and facilities, with improved safety for pedestrians at crossing points and some rail stations. Schemes to relieve traffic congestion are also required. The majority of these schemes are intended to be delivered over the short to medium term.

2.12 The funding gap figures provided for all schemes in the transport section (where the cost of the scheme is known) are estimated amounts taking into account funds allocated to Surrey County Council from the Integrated Transport Fund Scheme distributed by the Department for Transport. SCC is currently allocated approximately £4.78M per year to 2021. Thus over the delivery period of transport schemes in the schedule to 2021, amounting to around 7 years, the total amount of money received by SCC would be in the region of £33.5M.

2.13 There are a total of 11 local authority areas in Surrey (including Reigate & Banstead BC), and therefore taking the total of £33.5M, the average distribution to each authority area amounts to £3.04M. This figure has been divided by the total cost of transport schemes listed in the schedule (being £12,015,000) to obtain an average percentage figure of 25% that each scheme would receive from the allocated funding pot. Thus the funding gap for each scheme amounts to an estimated average of 75% of the cost2.

2.14 Surrey County Council have identified that it may seek to secure LEP funding for a number of schemes, and this is reflected in our schedules. However note that LEP funding is most likely to be targeted toward schemes on strategic road corridors. It is therefore the Borough Council’s view that the LEP is unlikely to prioritise the funding of many of the smaller-scale local improvements for which SCC have identified LEP funding as a potential source.

Emergency Services

2.15 At the time of the 2012 Infrastructure Delivery Plan, three police stations were located within the borough; in Reigate, Banstead, and Horley. Since this time Horley Police Station has closed, the decision being taken to sell both this site and Banstead Police Station in 2013, in response to budget cuts to the police service, who are seeking to rationalise their estate. Front counter services closed at Horley Police Station in 2011 but it was still the base for local officers. Police services to the public are now centralised at Reigate Police Station. At the time of writing, Horley Police Station is currently for sale, whilst Banstead Police Station was taken off the market in May 2014 in order to provide an operating base for both the local police and fire brigade, the latter due to the closure of Purley fire station in September 2014 for refurbishment.

2 Whilst the funding gap figures are only an estimate, it is considered more realistic to take into account the fact that there is likely to be some base funding available to deliver the transport programme. 6

2.16 The Police Custody Centre granted on appeal in Salfords in 2011, has been completed to provide a 24 cell custody suite at a cost of £7.7 million. A number of new schemes are also identified in the schedule which have been identified by Surrey Police as being necessary to meet the policing and community safety needs of planned new development and strategic growth. This includes further accommodation, fleet vehicles, and the installation of cameras. A proportion of costs based on development coming forward within the borough will also be required for planned county wide custody provision.

2.17 Significant progress has also been made regarding ‘Make Ready’ ambulance sites. Planning permission has been granted for two centres in Polegate, Crawley, and Brighton. A further four centres are intended to be developed over the period to 2019, subject to finding suitable sites.

Health

2.18 The schedules have been updated to reflect the need for additional GPs within the borough, over the plan period, due to population growth arising from natural growth and new development, increasing the demand for services on the existing local network of GP surgeries, detailed below. NHS Surrey and the relevant local Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) have been approached with a request to provide information about future GP provision requirements, based on estimated population growth in the borough over the plan period, but to date no response has been provided. The requirements for GP provision have therefore been estimated by the Borough Council.

2.19 The borough is currently served by a network of 16 GP practices which provide primary care services to residents3. These are shown in the table below alongside the size of the current patient list and number of GPs which operate at the practice.

3 Whilst some residents within the borough may be registered with GPs in adjoining areas, it is reasonable to assume the reverse is also true. As such, calculations of capacity and future needs are based on practices being located within the borough only.

Practice Name Address Registered Number Patients Patients of FTE per GP GPs Area 1 – North Downs Heathcote Medical Centre Heathcote, Tadworth 12,179 7 1,740 Tadworth Medical Centre Troy Close, Tadworth 9,115 6 1,519 Dr Khan Brighton Road, Coulsdon 3,547 2 1,773 Longcroft Clinic Woodmansterne Lane, Banstead 11,725 8 1,466 Tattenham Health Centre Tattenham Crescent, Banstead 6,178 5 1,236 Nork Clinic Nork Way, Banstead 7,138 4 1,784 Area 2 – Wealden Greensand Ridge Holmhurst Surgery 12 Thorntonside, Redhill 9,616 5 1,923 Woodlands Surgery 5 Woodlands Road, Redhill 11,161 5 2,232 Moat House Surgery Worsted Green, Merstham 10,717 6 1,786 Greystone Surgery 99 Station Road, Redhill 12,682 7 1,812 The Hawthorns Surgery 1 Oxford Road, Redhill 8,577 6 1,430 South Park Surgery Prices Lane, Reigate 3,000 2 1,500 Wall House Surgery Yorke Road, Reigate 15,462 9 1,718 Area 3 – Low Weald Clerklands Surgery Vicarage Lane, Horley 15,093 8 1,887 Wayside Surgery Kings Road, Horley 3,972 2 1,986 Horley Health Centre Kings Road, Horley 14,863 10 1,486 155,025 92 1,685 Source: NHS Choices

2.20 The NHS recommends no more than 1,750 people should be listed per full time equivalent GP in order to provide an appropriate and effective service – this is based on the average national list size.

2.21 The table above demonstrates that, across the borough, there is currently sufficient GP provision for the current population with the ratio of patients per GP (1:1,685) slightly below the recommended level. This borough-wide figure does however mask some localised pressures. These are particularly apparent in the Redhill area (where four of the five surgeries exceed the average). There is also some localised pressure in Horley and the north of the borough where a number of surgeries are operating at or above the recommended ratio.

Future growth

2.22 Taking ONS 2011 based population projections as a basis, natural growth (i.e. arising from birth exceeding deaths), will result in an increase of 7,900 requiring GP services. In addition to this, an additional 6,000 homes remain to be delivered in the borough over the period to 2027. Based on an assumption of 2.4 persons per household, this will generate a further demand for GP services of approximately 14,400 people. Total growth in the patient list could therefore be approximately 22,300 people, of which around two thirds is attributable to new development.

2.23 The total patient list for GP services in the borough by the end of the plan period could therefore be 177,300. Based on the current number of GPs operating in the borough (94) and assuming all practices operating at the recommended maximum of 1,750 people, current provision has a maximum capacity of 164,500 people, a shortfall of 12,800 compared to predicted total demand.

2.24 This shortfall necessitates additional GP provision in order to ensure adequate capacity, equivalent to space for an additional 8 FTE GPs across the borough by 2027.

Future provision and cost

2.25 Based on more modern GP premises developed in the borough (such as Holmhurst, Redhill and South Park Surgery, Reigate), the average space provided per GP is approximately 145sqm per practitioner. Applying this figure to the additional GP provision identified above indicates that approximately 1,160sqm of additional GP space will be required in the borough over the plan period. A cost of £1,750 per square metre is attributed to this to reflect likely development costs but not land acquisition.

2.26 The Low Weald area is expected to accommodate relatively significant housing growth over the plan period, including 1,510 homes as part of the North West Sector in Horley. Taking account of this growth and the limited residual capacity in current practices in the area, it is estimated that space for a further 3 GPs could be required in the Horley area over the plan period. A site for a new medical centre of up to 1,000sqm is proposed to be provided by the developers of the North West Sector; however, construction would need to be funded by a relevant provider. Assuming a centre sufficient to accommodate 3 GPs is provided (435sqm), this is estimated to cost approximately £750,000. This scheme is identified in Schedule 2 for Horley.

2.27 Growth in the North Downs area is expected to be focussed largely in the Preston Regeneration area, although it is recognised that the cumulative impact of on-going smaller windfall developments will further increase demand for GP surgeries. Based on the planned pattern of growth and capacity of existing GP surgeries, it is estimated that space for 1 additional GP (145sqm) will be required in this area over the plan period, accommodated either through a new surgery or expansion of an existing surgery. This is estimated to cost approximately £250,000.

2.28 Significant growth is planned in the central Wealden Greensand Ridge area of the borough through both regeneration projects in Redhill town centre, other urban opportunities and in the longer term urban extensions. Given the existing pressure on surgery capacity in this area, it is anticipated that space to accommodate an additional 4 GPs will be required across this area over the plan period. This is likely to necessitate a combination of extensions and new practices to provide a total of 580sqm. This need is estimated to cost £1.00m.

Green Infrastructure

2.29 The majority of schemes within this category have not been progressed, however they remain an important aspect of infrastructure associated with the delivery of the Core Strategy. A Green Infrastructure Strategy is being prepared by the Council which will provide more detailed information about a number of the schemes identified in the schedule. This document is currently planned to be published alongside the Preferred Options DMP. Schemes in the schedule will be reviewed as the strategy is adopted, and updated accordingly.

REGENERATION INFRASTRUCTURE

2.30 The borough has four regeneration areas (Horley, Merstham, Preston, and Redhill) where intervention has been identified as being necessary to improve the economic, social and environmental wellbeing of residents. The regeneration areas of the borough are where the Council intends to direct most growth and therefore, special attention is required for infrastructure and services in these areas. The Core Strategy policies direct appropriate levels of growth to these areas, and the IDP seeks to define those infrastructure schemes that will be required to deliver the proposed growth and development in each of these locations.

Schedule 2: Horley Regeneration Infrastructure

2.31 Regeneration is primarily focused on the town centre and the North East and North West sectors, although there are also other stand alone projects. Considerable progress has been made towards the delivery of schemes listed in the schedule, as well as the addition of new schemes since the 2012 IDP. Further details, such as within the ‘needs for scheme’ column, have also been added to many of the previous entries. The majority of schemes are planned to be delivered over a medium to long term period. Infrastructure in the sectors relies on developer funding secured through Section 106 undertakings.

2.32 Within the Horley NE sector, the majority of SUDs and flood plain compensation works have been undertaken, and similar measures have been secured by planning condition on approved consents within the NW sector. Provisions towards a recycling centre in the NE sector, and CCTV in the NW sector have been secured through s106 agreements, and sites for a medical centre and faith centre in the NW have been secured by the same means. The first allotment site in the NE sector was completed and transferred to Horley Town Council in 2014, and a one form entry primary school was completed and opened in 2014 in the same sector.

2.33 Many of the schemes listed within the schedule have been secured through the s106 agreement for the North West Sector. However the IDP schedules recognise that this funding is not certain until the scheme is implemented; a potential funding gap figure of up to an estimated maximum amount has therefore been provided for all affected schemes, should the developer choose instead to meet infrastructure requirements via CIL payments, once CIL has been adopted by the Council. This affects schemes as diverse as transport related improvements across Horley, outdoor sports provision, the Riverside Green Chain, and the provision of a secondary school. Schemes for a new library and Young People’s Centre within the town centre are also affected.

2.34 Additionally within the town centre, a potential funding gap not related to the adoption of CIL, has been identified for public realm improvements, the need for which was identified in 2005 in the Horley Master Plan. The intended improvements would benefit aspects such as streets, safety, environment, lighting, and crossings. The works are also dependent on detailed design and safety audit work, in addition to the need for securing additional funding.

2.35 A number of new schemes since the 2012 IDP document are identified at entries 2/28 to 2/37 of the schedule. These are situated mostly in the NE and NW sectors, and primarily involve improvements to the highway network for measures such as traffic calming.

Schedule 3: Merstham Regeneration Infrastructure

2.36 The Merstham estate was identified by the Surrey Strategic Partnership as one of its four Priority Places in Surrey. The Merstham Estate Regeneration Plan has been developed in conjunction with other partners including Raven Housing Trust and SCC. One of the main objectives of the plan is to improve housing, infrastructure, and the environment of the estate area to support the wider regeneration of Merstham.

2.37 Regarding the updates to previous entries, further details have been added to provide clarity on aspects such as the need for schemes and the contingencies/dependencies. For example, the community hub facilities on the Triangle site will include a library, youth centre, community rooms and an internet café, and the scheme for public realm improvements is dependent on the progression of developments at the Iron Horse, and Portland Drive sites. The provision of new retail units on both the Iron Horse and Triangle sites has been included at entry 3/4.

2.38 The community hub and retail/ housing schemes on the Triangle site and Iron Horse site have been progressed over the past two years. Funding is in place and the schemes have been tendered. It is anticipated that works will start on both sites in Spring 2015 and will be complete by Spring 2016. The public realm improvements for Portland Drive will take place as part of the above schemes and following the demolition of the existing shopping parade on Portland Drive.

Schedule 4: Preston Regeneration Infrastructure

2.39 The Preston Planning Framework was approved by the Council in April 2012 and seeks to address the challenges present in the Preston regeneration area. The area suffers with some of the highest deprivation in the borough, and is the fourth most deprived ward in Surrey. A number of issues affect Preston, most notably overcrowding, unsuitable housing, lack of access to public and private amenity spaces, and poor quality local services and facilities, with limited connectivity across and beyond the regeneration area.

2.40 One of the main regeneration schemes centres around the provision of leisure centre/community facilities; a new leisure and community centre (Tadworth Leisure and Community Centre), and replacement Phoenix Youth Centre are currently being built to replace the Banstead Leisure Centre, Tattenhams Community Centre, and Phoenix Youth Centre. Funding has come from a number of sources, and works began in June 2014, with completion of the scheme due in late summer 2015.

2.41 Some of the scheme entries have been updated to reflect revisions to the estimated cost, and the delivery phasing period. A new scheme has been added to the schedule involving the installation of a compacted gravel, lit, footpath, connecting Chetwode Road to the A240. This scheme will improve sustainable travel options, and works began in October 2014, with completion due in the early part of 2015.

Schedule 5: Redhill Regeneration Infrastructure

2.42 Redhill is the largest town in the borough and has long been recognised as an area of strategic importance with the potential to become a more well-connected and vibrant town centre. However, Redhill suffers with a poor public perception as a location in which to invest, and struggles to balance its role as a local transport destination with its strategic location as a through route at the intersection of the A23 and A25 arterial routes. In order to enable the potential for significant economic expansion and regeneration, the provision of infrastructure is essential. This includes the provision of schemes and measures for improvements to traffic and parking, the public realm, provision for flooding, and air quality monitoring and improvements.

2.43 The 2012 IDP reported that the Council was developing the Redhill Town Centre Area Action Plan (RTCAAP), which was a Development Plan Document (DPD), specifically designed to provide policies to help deliver regeneration in the town centre, and guide the significant amount of development proposed in the area. Since this time the Council has taken the decision to incorporate the main policies and remaining site allocations into the Development Management Plan (DMP) rather than continuing with a standalone document (the latest version, dated January 2012, was subject to extensive consultation). However, strong progress has been made since the original conception of the RTCAAP in terms of the bringing forward of a number of key sites within the town centre, and with the related infrastructure schemes listed in the previous IDP schedule.

2.44 Urban realm improvements have significantly progressed since the 2012 IDP. Works for Station Road (West End) were completed in Spring 2012, and to the east end, are due for completion in March 2015. Schemes at the Station Underpass/Noke Drive, and High Street/Marketfield Way, are also due for completion in March 2015. Demolition works for the extension of Sainsbury’s at Warwick Quadrant North began in October 2014, whilst the environmental initiative (focused on improvements to highly localised problem areas) is almost complete, except for two specified areas due to current ownership issues. The Memorial Park improvement project was completed in October 2014, and features a new café, play area, and sports facilities.

2.45 Concerning schemes related to flood risk mitigation, as related in the flooding section above, a scheme is presently being investigated to consider the potential to increase flood storage upstream of Redhill town centre. Further details of this project will be known by June 2015 – this scheme is identified at entry 5/21. A scheme for flood attenuation works at Marketfield Way is also currently under negotiation, with a planning application anticipated to be submitted by June 2015.

2.46 The Environment Agency has been keen to support RBBC investigating other flood risk management approaches to reducing the risk and severity of flooding in the town centre, which has included a project for the use of flood storage in Memorial Park (at entry 5/16). However, since the 2012 IDP, a cost benefit analysis for this particular project demonstrated that it was more cost effective to undertake site by site attenuation, and therefore the project was closed and funding reallocated to the Park Improvement Project (at entry 5/15).

2.47 Air Quality monitoring work within the town centre is on-going, ensuring that pollution levels are not rising as a result of new development and are in line with forecast levels.

2.48 Regarding transport related schemes, Surrey County Council has confirmed significant progress on work related to the sustainable towns toolkit; schemes for bus corridor improvements, walking and cycling measures, and electric vehicles and associated infrastructure, have been largely completed, with the installation of electric charging points for vehicles at various locations under current consideration.

2.49 Schemes relating to the Balanced Network package of transport measures (which were formulated following detailed modelling and a test study in early 2012), which centre around the conversion of the one-way system west of the town centre to two- way working, are currently underway, and due to be completed in March 2015. Schemes include signal works, improvements to roundabout configuration and crossings, and measures for two-way working on the A25. A number of schemes for improvements to the rail station have also been completed; delivery of others is anticipated within the short term.

Annex 1 – Organisations Consulted

Environment Agency Highways Agency Surrey & Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust Reigate & Banstead Borough Council (Drainage, Environmental Health, Housing Services, Regeneration) Surrey County Council (Education, Flooding, Libraries, Transport) Surrey Police Sutton & East Surrey Water Thames Water

***

RBBC Infrastructure Delivery Plan Schedules – 2014 Update

These schedules present an updated summary of the infrastructure requirements of the borough, and are discussed within the associated addendum report.

Schedule 1: Boroughwide Infrastructure (not within regeneration areas)

Schedule 2: Horley Regeneration Infrastructure

Schedule 3: Merstham Regeneration Infrastructure

Schedule 4: Preston Regeneration Infrastructure

Schedule 5: Redhill Regeneration Infrastructure

Acronyms: RBBC = Reigate & Banstead Borough Council, SCC = Surrey County Council, CIL = Community Infrastructure Levy, s106 = Section 106 obligations, FE = Forms of Entry, GPF = Growing Places Fund, LSTF = Local Sustainable Transport Fund, LTP = Local Transport Plan, NGP = New Growth Points, HLF = Heritage Lottery Fund, RHT = Raven Housing Trust, CCG – Clinical Commissioning Group

SCHEDULE 1: BOROUGHWIDE INFRASTRUCTURE NOT FALLING WITHIN ANY REGENERATION PROJECTS

1/2 Redhill East New 6 FE Secondary Increase in school pupil SCC £30m SCC, CIL, private sector Estimated £18.7m From 2017 Lack of site, funding Need to find 6 acre site. Children 1 Site search to SCC School School with space to numbers in this area due to partnership, other grant issues go outside area for education, identify any suitable Organisations expand to 10FE forecast demographic changes - non allocated larger class sizes in existing sites currently being Plan April 2014 schools conducted 1/3 Redhill/ Expansion of existing Increase in school pupil SCC Circa SCC, CIL, private sector Estimated £3.7m 2-3 years Funding issues Children go outside area for 1 Schools being SCC Reigate primary schools – at least numbers in this area due to £6m partnership, other grant education, larger class sizes in identified and 3 forms of additional recent completion of - non allocated existing schools projects worked up entry Watercolour and Park 25 developments and ongoing pressure on schools in Reigate due to high demand 1/4 Redhill/ Additional 2 forms of Increase in school pupil SCC Circa SCC, CIL, private sector Estimated £3.7m 5-10 years Lack of sites, funding Children go outside area for 1 SCC Reigate entry numbers in this area over the £6M partnership, other grant issues education, larger class sizes in long term period, due to - non allocated existing schools sustainable urban extensions and other new residential developments

Sch/ LOCATION SCHEME NEED FOR SCHEME LEAD DELIVERY COST FUNDING GAPS IN DELIVERY RISKS TO DELIVERY CONTINGENCIES/ CRITICALITY Comments Progress Report SOURCE No AGENCY/ ARRANGEMENTS FUNDING PHASING DEPENDENCIES 1=priority 2014 MANAGEMENT 2=important ORGANISATION 3=desirable 1/5 Banstead/ Additional primary form Small amount of surplus SCC £1m est SCC, CIL, private sector Estimated £625K From 2015 Lack of site, funding Depends on future housing 2 Banstead & SCC School Tadworth of entry capacity in this part of the partnership, other grant issues delivery. Expansion of existing Woodmansterne Organisations Borough currently, however - non allocated school or accept slight forecast to have Plan April 2014 additional 1FE may be required overcrowding small surplus of over the plan period. places, which may be reduced by demand from residents of Netherne-on-the- Hill. 1/6 Horley Early years (pre-primary) Early years education capacity SCC Not Unknown Not costed Short term Lack of site, funding Accept high use at existing 1 Need only recently Being provided as SCC education facility is likely to be exceeded in known within 5 years issues facilities, investigate expansion of identified, hence no part of Trinity Oaks Horley with the development existing facilities prior appearance in Primary School (see of the NE and NW sectors Horley regeneration entry 1/7) work. 1/7 Horley Expansion of Langshott Increase in school pupil SCC £2.5m SCC – funds allocated £0 2014-2017 None Investigate expansion at existing 1 Expansion has been SCC Infant School by 1 FE numbers in this area due to facilities approved. The new housing school will expand by one form between 2014 and 2017, reaching a full capacity of 420 pupils. 1/8 Borough, Super-fast broadband To meet the government’s SCC £2.5m Total cost of £35m £0 2012-2014 None – £1.3m bid None 2 Cost estimated As of August 2014, SCC Website particularly infrastructure (pan intention for superfast est. across Surrey: successful based dividing total fibre broadband has isolated Surrey) broadband and SCC’s ambition (RBBC SCC - £21.9m cost across Surrey been provided to and rural for 100% coverage in Surrey by only) BT (private) - £11.8m into district level 75% of the county areas 2013. Support rural enterprise BDUK - £1.3m figures based on (68,000 homes and and communications coverage. number of premises businesses), The project will serve at least to be served (i.e. including Tadworth 84,000 premises across Surrey RBBC = 6,000 out of and Walton on the and in Reigate & Banstead will 84,000: 7.1% = Hill. By the end of cover almost 6,000 premises. £2.5m 2014, the technology is expected to reach more than 99% of Surrey. 1/9 Borough Water supply – Sutton and East Surrey Water’s SESW Not Customer revenues £0 Uprating of Low risk In the event that Phase 3 is not 1 Phase 2 of SESW expansion of treatment baseline supply demand known treatment forthcoming, there is a greater treatment works works capacity at balance (Final Water Resources capacity to be risk to customers of demand uprating completed Reservoir A, and Management Plan 2014) shows delivered in restrictions in periods of drought. 2013. Two major associated new trunk supply deficits occurring three phases. In the event of drought, SESW trunk mains mains between 2033 and 2036 at Phase 2 will follow its drought plan. In schemes will have both peak and dry year completed in the event that trunk main been completed by average demands. The 2013 (works schemes are not delivered, there early 2015. company proposes to meet capacity 50 is a greater risk of supply failure these deficits through a Ml/d). Phase 3 in the event of a major treatment combination of demand to be works outage. management (including water undertaken in efficiency, metering and 2020 to 2023 leakage reduction) and (works capacity increased treatment capacity 70 Ml/d). at its Reservoir A. This scheme Associated new together with associated new trunk main trunk mains also forms the projects are major element of the planned for the company’s project to increase period 2015 to resilience. 2025.

Sch/ LOCATION SCHEME NEED FOR SCHEME LEAD DELIVERY COST FUNDING GAPS IN DELIVERY RISKS TO DELIVERY CONTINGENCIES/ CRITICALITY Comments Progress Report SOURCE No AGENCY/ ARRANGEMENTS FUNDING PHASING DEPENDENCIES 1=priority 2014 MANAGEMENT 2=important ORGANISATION 3=desirable 1/10 Borough Demand Management Water efficiency, metering and SESW Not Customer revenues £0 In five-year Low risk None 2 SESW uses a range SESW has met its SESW Measures leakage reduction form part of known periods set by of demand water efficiency the company’s plan for OFWAT management target and meter meeting deficits in supply to initiatives and water penetration target meet rising demand. efficiency measures. for the period 2010 Meters are installed to 2015. New on change of targets have been occupancy and to set for the period meter optants, and 2015 to 2020, to all new including leakage properties. reduction. 1/11 Merstham Water treatment – To accommodate growth in Thames Water £2m est Funded through income. £0 Short-term None Funding is in place for the 1 Completed May Thames Water planned upgrade to line with development as set Projects determined by scheme, therefore, there are no 2013 Merstham STW. out in the Core Strategy OFWAT in five-year contingencies rolling programmes 1/12 West Flood Alleviation Scheme To reduce the risk of flooding Environment £3.1m EA bid for funding to £800K Next 5 years Funding cost not Localised flooding may reoccur in 2 Environment Horley to West Horley and the Middle Agency/SCC/ Defra / CIL identified / funding Horley if this scheme is not Agency Mole area. RBBC issues/ insufficient CIL forthcoming. funds collected 1/13 Burstow Flood Alleviation Scheme To reduce the risk of flooding Environment £600K EA bid for funding to Estimated £156K Next 5 years Funding cost not Localised flooding may reoccur in 2 Environment River within the Burstow River Agency/SCC/ Defra / CIL identified / funding the Burstow River catchment and Agency, RBBC Catchment catchment area, which will in RBBC issues/ insufficient CIL Horley if this scheme is not turn benefit South Horley, the funds collected forthcoming. A23 link to Gatwick, and various commercial and residential buildings that chronically flood 1/14 Borough Public Realm To improve the vitality and RBBC £15k - RBBC – non allocated £0.9m Phasing in line Lack of funding. No contingencies other than to 2 Improvements – Local viability of Local Centres and £40k per with continue to seek and pool Centres, Satellite sites, “satellite sites” of shops and site prioritisation different sources of funding Parades & Shops (36 services through public realm schedule and identified) improvements £0.9m availability of est funding 1/15 Various Air Quality Monitoring Action plan measures to RBBC Not RBBC, CIL – Measures Unknown Ongoing Lack of funds Accept poorer air quality 2 RBBC currently Further assessment RBBC Website Locations Areas address air quality issues, costed tailored to available developing AQMA of Hooley AQMA & bringing NO2 to within funds Action Plans carried out in Feb Environmental acceptable levels in identified 2013. Health, RBBC problem areas Microsimulation study of traffic at Drift Bridge, Banstead completed in August 2014. On- going work with Gatwick airport to minimise emissions to be completed April 2015 – with extension to April 2017 currently under consideration. 1/16 Borough Provision of cemetery Borough is experiencing an RBBC £3m est RBBC/private/CIL £3m Within 8 years Suitable site(s) not No contingency as this is a not a 2 Options for delivery RBBC wide space increasing shortage in burial found or not acquired statutory function. Some reuse are to be considered space which is particularly of existing cemeteries may as part of the acute in the north of the provide small amount of Development Borough additional capacity. Cremation Management Plan only or burial outside of Borough would remain only options.

Sch/ LOCATION SCHEME NEED FOR SCHEME LEAD DELIVERY COST FUNDING GAPS IN DELIVERY RISKS TO DELIVERY CONTINGENCIES/ CRITICALITY Comments Progress Report SOURCE No AGENCY/ ARRANGEMENTS FUNDING PHASING DEPENDENCIES 1=priority 2014 MANAGEMENT 2=important ORGANISATION 3=desirable 1/17 Earlswood Expansion/re Waste Strategy requires SCC/SITA UK/ £1m est SCC – funded under £0 Planning Planning permission Accept a reduction in service 1 Planning application RBBC Website Depot organisation of upgrade of processing facilities RBBC ‘world class waste application delivery as growth continues RE/P/13/01661/CO (planning operations and facilities at Earlswood including solutions’ programme Spring 2012 N, for development section) to cater for food waste construction of new loading of materials bulking and dry recyclables building facility for solid waste, granted permission by SCC in February 2014, and implemented. 1/18 Various Recycling bring sites (10 To provide coverage of RBBC £0.2m RBBC/CIL £0.2m In line with Lack of suitable sites Greater reliance on kerbside 2 Locations additional) recycling facilities est development collection 1/19 Various Improvement and Retain modern and up-to-date SCC Not SCC/CIL Unknown In line with Funding issues None 2 Locations rationalisation of library library facilities, particularly IT costed development facilities to cater for services increase in population 1/20 Central Police Custody Centre Existing facilities at Reigate Surrey Police Unknown Police Internal Budget £0 Within 5 years None Planning permission granted on 2 £7.7m 24 cell Surrey Police area police station are inadequate appeal custody suite within Website & BBC the IO Industrial News Surrey Estate at Salfords Website completed and opened on 4.11.2013. 1/21 Various Division based To provide Neighbourhood, Surrey Police £400K Police Internal Budget / Est £400K Short to Funding issues / None 2 Surrey Police Locations accommodation Response and Division based est CIL Medium term insufficient CIL funds (through adaptation and policing to address increase in collected extension of existing incidents/crimes generated by Police Stations and new development provision of other satellite sites) 1/22 Various Central and shared To provide county wide and Surrey Police £690K Police Internal Budget / Est £690K Unknown – Funding issues / None 2 Surrey Police Locations accommodation specialist policing to support est CIL dependent on insufficient CIL funds (through provision, new development and address building collected adaptation, and increase in incidents/crimes programme extension of central generated by development shared sites 1/23 Borough Provision of fleet vehicles To address increase in Surrey Police £100K Police Internal Budget / Est £100K Unknown – Funding issues / None 3 Surrey Police wide for use by new/increased incidents/crimes that require CIL dependent on insufficient CIL funds number of officers increased patrols and on site building collected responses and visit by police programme officers 1/24 Borough Provision of fleet bicycles To address increase in Surrey Police £5K Police Internal Budget / Est £5K Unknown – Funding issues / None 3 Surrey Police wide for use by new/increased incidents/crimes that require CIL dependent on insufficient CIL funds number of officers increased patrols and on site building collected responses and visit by police programme officers 1/25 Borough Installation of ANPR To accommodate growth in Surrey Police Unknown Police Internal Budget / Unknown Unknown – Funding cost not None 3 The cost is Surrey Police wide Cameras, located with population and subsequent CIL dependent on identified / funding dependant on regard to delivery of growth in crime, for building issues/ insufficient CIL specific locations of development, in investigation and detection of programme funds collected development, in travelling crime and serious crime types. relation to peripheral locations, and vulnerability main access routes into/out of the Borough 1/26 Borough Installation of CCTV To provide crime detection Surrey Police Unknown Police Internal Budget / Unknown Unknown – Funding cost not None 3 The cost is Surrey Police wide Cameras equipment in areas of CIL dependent on identified / funding dependant on significant population growth, building issues/ insufficient CIL specific locations of arising from planned programme funds collected development, in development in the Borough relation to vulnerability 1/27 Surrey wide Custody provision To provide increased county Surrey Police Unknown Police Internal Budget / Unknown Unknown – Funding cost not None 2 The cost is Surrey Police wide custody provision, with CIL dependent on identified / funding dependant on the proportion of costs based building issues/ insufficient CIL specific locations of on development coming programme funds collected development, in forward in the Borough relation to vulnerability

1/31 A23 A23 Redhill to Horley Encourage the use of SCC £775k LEP/LTP/CIL – not Est £580k Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 1 SCC Annex to corridor improvements sustainable transport modes by allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB improving accessibility for 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward pedestrians and cyclists and development sites come forward Programme address air quality issues Sept 2014 1/32 A23 Convert footway on east There are no facilities for SCC £600k LEP/LTP/CIL – not Est £450k Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 1 SCC Annex to side to shared use for cyclists along this important allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB pedestrians and cyclists – corridor. Will link with existing 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward sections will need to be cycling facilities at both ends. development sites come forward Programme widened and resurfaced Sept 2014 1/33 A23 A23 at and near Improve accessibility to the bus SCC £25K LEP/LTP/CIL/Road Safety Est £18K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 1 SCC Annex to junctions with Horley service to Redhill/Reigate and – not allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB Lodge Lane and Lodge Horley and to the rail service to 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward Lane, Salfords encourage the use of development sites come forward Programme  Widen and sustainable transport modes Sept 2014 resurface footway to the nearest northbound and southbound bus stops  Dropped crossings and tactile paving  Provide pedestrian crossing, including dropped crossings and a central refuge, to enable pedestrians to safely cross the A23

4 Transport funding arrangements based on information provided from Surrey County Council; however note that that it is unlikely that LEP funding will be appropriate for the smaller local schemes.

1/34 Salfords Salfords Railway station Improve safety at the rail SCC £5K LEP/LTP/CIL – not Est £3K Concept only Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 3 SCC Annex to – security improvements, station to encourage the use of allocated Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB including lighting sustainable transport modes collected are available and relevant Forward improvements development sites come forward Programme Sept 2014 1/35 Earlswood Maple Road/Three Arch Improve capacity and safety for SCC £100K CIL Est £75K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues None 1 SCC Annex to Road junction, South all road users years from Draft R&BB Earlswood – junction 2014 Forward operation and safety Programme improvements Sept 2014 1/36 Earlswood Earslwood Railway To improve safety for SCC £16K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £12K Short term: 0-2 Funding source not None 2 SCC Annex to station – improved pedestrians crossing this point allocated years from identified Draft R&BB access for pedestrians on 2014 Forward approach roads Programme Sept 2014

A23 Redhill to Borough Boundary

1/37 Redhill A23 between Redhill and There are no facilities for SCC £350K LEP/LTP/CIL – not Est £260K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 1 SCC Annex to boundary with Croydon cyclists along this important allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB LB (Coulsdon) – corridor. Will link with existing 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward conversion of footway cycling facilities at both ends. development sites come forward Programme (combination of east and Sept 2014 west side) to shared use for pedestrians and cyclists 1/38 Merstham A23 Junction with To improve safety for SCC £100K LTP/CIL/LEP– not Est £75K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 1 SCC Annex to Quality Street, Merstham pedestrians allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB – improve pedestrian 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward crossing facilities development sites come forward Programme Sept 2014 1/39 Salfords A23 Corridor in Salfords To improve safety for all road SCC £40K LTP/CIL/Road Safety – Est £30K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 1 SCC Annex to road safety scheme users along this causality hot not allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB spot 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward development sites come forward Programme Sept 2014 A217 Banstead/Kingswood Corridor Improvements

1/40 A217 A217 between the M25 There are no facilities for SCC £1M LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £750K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to junction and Fir Tree cyclists along this important allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB Road – conversion of corridor 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward footway on east side to development sites come forward Programme shared use for Sept 2014 pedestrians and cyclists 1/41 A217 A217/A2022 Banstead Improve vehicle capacity and SCC £200K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £150K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 1 SCC Annex to Crossroads. pedestrian safety allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB Fir Tree Road/Winkworth 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward Road and junction with development sites come forward Programme Banstead Road – install Sept 2014 pedestrian facilities and improve capacity for vehicles 1/42 A217 A217 Junction with To improve safety especially SCC £330K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £245K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to Burgh Wood for children going to local allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB  Toucan crossing schools and vehicles turning 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward  New traffic signal out of side roads onto A217 development sites come forward Programme controlled junction Sept 2014 1/43 A217 A217 Brighton Road Improve safety for all highway SCC £100K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £75K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to junction with The Drive – users allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB Highway safety 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward improvements development sites come forward Programme Sept 2014

Sch/ LOCATION SCHEME NEED FOR SCHEME LEAD DELIVERY COST FUNDING GAPS IN DELIVERY RISKS TO DELIVERY CONTINGENCIES/ CRITICALITY Comments Progress Report SOURCE No AGENCY/ ARRANGEMENTS FUNDING PHASING DEPENDENCIES 1=priority 2014 MANAGEMENT 2=important ORGANISATION 3=desirable 1/44 A217 A217 between junction Improvement to accessibility SCC £25K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £18K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to with Tadworth for pedestrians to the bus allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB Street/Bonsor Drive and service 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward junction with A240 – bus development sites come forward Programme stop facility and Sept 2014 accessibility improvements 1/45 A217 A217 junction with Improvement to pedestrian SCC £8K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £6K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / None 2 SCC Annex to Waterhouse Lane – safety allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds Draft R&BB improved crossing 2014 collected Forward facilities for pedestrians. Programme Sept 2014 1/46 A217 A217/Tadworth Improve peak hour traffic SCC £40K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £30K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 1 SCC Annex to Street/Bonsor capacity on the Tadworth allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB Drive/Dorking Road Street arm approach and 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward roundabout – provide a improve pedestrian safety development sites come forward Programme additional entry lane on Sept 2014 the Tadworth Street approach 1/47 A217 A217 junction with To reduce casualties and SCC £625K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £470K Medium term: Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 1 SCC Annex to Smithy Lane and improve pedestrian safety allocated 3-6 years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB Buckland Road, Lower 2016 collected are available and relevant Forward Kingswood development sites come forward Programme Sept 2014 1/48 A217 A217 Reigate Hill / To improve safety and reduce SCC £200- LTP/CIL/Road Safety – Est £225K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 1 SCC Annex to Gatton Bottom safety collisions 300K not allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB improvements – signal 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward junction to improve development sites come forward Programme safety of right hand turn Sept 2014 1/49 A217 Woodhatch crossroads – To reduce casualties at this site SCC £150K LTP/CIL/Road Safety – Est £110K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 1 SCC Annex to improved/controlled and improve safety not allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB pedestrian crossing 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward facilities on eastern arm development sites come forward Programme of junction Sept 2014 1/50 Woodhatch Slipsnatch Road ditch To improve safety and reduce SCC £80K LTP/CIL/Road Safety – Est £60K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to improvements incidents of vehicles leaving not allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB nearside carriageway into ditch 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward development sites come forward Programme Sept 2014 Redhill (Package of measures for Redhill Local Area not falling within Regeneration Areas)

1/51 Redhill A23 Frenches Address congestion on London SCC £200k est CIL/LTP – not allocated Est £150K Medium/long Funding issues / Depends on outcome of Redhill 1 No further progress SCC Road/Linkfield Road term: from Insufficient CIL funds regeneration transport scheme has been made Lane/London Road 2016 collected and resulting traffic patterns, junction – conversion to along with further detailed study MOVA Signal control 1/52 Redhill Linkfield Lane/Gloucester Accommodate forecast traffic SCC £150k est CIL/LTP – not allocated Est £110K Medium/long Funding issues / Depends on outcome of Redhill 2 No further progress SCC Road Junction works flows more efficiently term: from Insufficient CIL funds regeneration transport scheme has been made 2016 collected and resulting traffic patterns, along with further detailed study 1/53 Redhill A25 Linkfield Lane Accommodate forecast traffic SCC £100k est CIL/LTP – not allocated Est £75K Medium/long Funding issues / Depends on outcome of Redhill 2 No further progress SCC Station Road/Hatchlands flows more efficiently term: from Insufficient CIL funds regeneration transport scheme has been made Road junction works 2016 collected and resulting traffic patterns, along with further detailed study 1/54 Redhill A25 Hatchlands Accommodate forecast traffic SCC £100k CIL/LTP – not allocated Est £75K Medium/long Funding issues / Depends on outcome of Redhill 2 No further progress SCC Road/Fengates Road flows more efficiently term: from Insufficient CIL funds regeneration transport scheme has been made junction works 2016 collected and resulting traffic patterns, along with further detailed study 1/55 Redhill Other local scheme; Improve accessibility to the bus SCC £18K LTP/CIL Est £13K Site visit – no Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 3 SCC Annex to Timperley Gardens, service to encourage the use of design Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB  Improved waiting sustainable transport modes collected are available and relevant Forward facilities including development sites come forward Programme bus shelter Sept 2014  Improve crossing facilities

1/57 Reigate Remodelling of Increase efficiency of the Highways £1m est CIL/HA budget – not Est £1M Medium / Long Not a sufficiently high Depends on further detailed 1 M25 J8 merge/diverge junction to accommodate Agency budgeted term priority from the HA’s feasibility study and assessment configuration of M25 forecast traffic flows perspective, insufficient motorway J8 (with A217) funding 1/58 A217 A217 Reigate Hill Package of 3 separate projects SCC/RBBC/ Circa CIL/LTP/LEP – not Est £64K Medium/long Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 1 corridor improvements comprising pedestrian safety developers £86k allocated term: from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds and accessibility measures 2016 collected are available and relevant development sites come forward 1/59 Reigate Road Network To relieve congestion, improve SCC £5M LTP/LEP/CIL – not Est £3.7M Medium term: Funding issues None 2 Whilst this scheme SCC Annex to Improvements, Reigate accessibility and connectivity allocated 3-6 years from is in the SCC Annex, Draft R&BB including: and improve the public realm 2016 pedestrianisation of Forward  Relieving traffic the High Street Programme congestion on the does not have the Sept 2014 A25 and A217 by re- formal support of configuring the RBBC town’s central road network  Improving access and connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists to the main shopping areas  Removal of non- essential traffic from Reigate High Street  Improving public transport accessibility to the town 1/60 Reigate Reigate town centre – To improve safety for SCC £8K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £6K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to A25 West Street, pedestrians allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB Reigate; improve 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward crossing facilities at development sites come forward Programme junction with Upper Sept 2014 West Street 1/61 Reigate A25 High Street - To improve safety for SCC Unknown LTP/CIL/LEP – not Unknown Short term: 0-2 Cost not identified / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to improved crossing pedestrians allocated years from insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB facilities at the Park Lane 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward junction development sites come forward Programme Sept 2014 1/62 Reigate A25 West Street/High To improve safety for SCC £2K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £1K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to Street, High Street and pedestrians allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB Upper High Street, 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward Reigate - Public Safety development sites come forward Programme Improvement Scheme, Sept 2014 improving street lighting and CCTV coverage. 1/63 Reigate A25 Reigate, adjacent to SCC £10K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £7K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to High Street – Extension allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB of UTC to include traffic 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward signals, development sites come forward Programme real time pollution Sept 2014 monitoring

1/64 Merstham Merstham Railway Improve cycle parking facilities SCC £10K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £7K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to Station – secure and to encourage sustainable allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB sheltered cycle storage access to railway station 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward facilities development sites come forward Programme Sept 2014 Preston (Measures for Preston Local Area not falling within Regeneration Areas)

1/65 Preston Pedestrian crossing in To aid access to Epsom Downs Unknown Unknown LTP/CIL/LEP Unknown Short term: 0-2 The lead delivery None 2 SCC Annex to Merland Rise School, and replace dangerous years from agency, cost, and Draft R&BB kerb build out 2014 funding arrangements Forward have not been identified Programme Sept 2014

Banstead and Nork

1/66 Banstead Banstead Railway Improve pedestrian and cycling SCC £80K CIL/LEP/Network Rail – Est £60K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to Station including: accessibility to Banstead not allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB  Improve pedestrian railway station 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward and cycle links development sites come forward Programme (including shared Sept 2014 footpath/cycleways, resurfacing, signing and street lighting)  Secure and sheltered cycle storage 1/67 Banstead A240 Reigate Road/Fir Improve vehicle capacity and SCC £200K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £150K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues None 2 SCC Annex to Tree Road junction pedestrian safety. Improve air allocated years from Draft R&BB Crossroads – install quality (this area is an AQMA) 2014 Forward pedestrian crossing Programme facilities and capacity Sept 2014 improvements for vehicles through the junction 1/68 Banstead Improve cycle and Improve safety and SCC £250K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £185K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to pedestrian facilities accessibility for cyclists and allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB pedestrians 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward development sites come forward Programme Sept 2014 1/69 Nork Nork Way, Cycling An important link for cyclists SCC £75K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £55K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to improvements – allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB resurface BW 628 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward between Nork Way and development sites come forward Programme The Drive Sept 2014 1/70 Nork Nork local shopping area To improve pedestrian crossing SCC £52K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £39K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to – improve pedestrian facilities and pedestrian allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB crossing facilities, and accessibility to the local shops 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward pedestrian and cyclist development sites come forward Programme link Sept 2014 1/71 Nork Approaches to Warren Improve pedestrian/child SCC £10K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £7K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 3 SCC Annex to Mead Junior/Infant safety allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB School, Roundwood 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward Way, Nork: development sites come forward Programme  Dropped crossings Sept 2014 at junction of Roundwood Way and Shelly Close.  Pedestrian crossing at junction of Roundwood Way and Roundwood View

Kingswood

1/74 Kingswood Kingswood Railway Improve cycle parking facilities SCC £8K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £6K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 3 SCC Annex to Station – secure and to encourage sustainable allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB sheltered cycle storage access to railway station 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward facilities development sites come forward Programme Sept 2014 1/75 Kingswood Highway safety Improve safety and access for SCC £70K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £52K Short term: 0-2 Funding not identified None 2 SCC Annex to improvements all users allocated years from Draft R&BB 2014 Forward Programme Sept 2014 1/76 Kingswood Waterhouse Lane, To improve safety for SCC £5K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £3K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 3 SCC Annex to junction with Woodland pedestrians crossing allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB Way/Kingswood: 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward pedestrian crossing development sites come forward Programme facilities – tactile Sept 2014 1/77 Kingswood Junction of St Monica’s Improve pedestrian safety SCC £100K LTP/Developer Est £75K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues None 2 SCC Annex to Road/Waterhouse contributions/CIL years from Draft R&BB Lane/Bonsor Drive, 2014 Forward Kingswood – improve Programme pedestrian crossing Sept 2014 facilities and capacity improvements

Tadworth & Tattenham Corner

1/78 Tattenham Highway safety Improve safety and access for SCC £54K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £40K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to Corner improvements all users allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward development sites come forward Programme Sept 2014 1/79 Tadworth Tadworth Primary School Improve pedestrian/child SCC £2K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £1K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 3 SCC Annex to – tactile paving provision safety allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB across Watts Lane 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward junction with Tadworth development sites come forward Programme Street Sept 2014

Sch/ LOCATION SCHEME NEED FOR SCHEME LEAD DELIVERY COST FUNDING GAPS IN DELIVERY RISKS TO DELIVERY CONTINGENCIES/ CRITICALITY Comments Progress Report SOURCE No AGENCY/ ARRANGEMENTS FUNDING PHASING DEPENDENCIES 1=priority 2014 MANAGEMENT 2=important ORGANISATION 3=desirable 1/80 Tadworth Routes to Tadworth Improve pedestrian safety and SCC £10K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £7K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to Railway Station – facilities to access the railway allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB improved pedestrian station 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward crossing facilities (tactile development sites come forward Programme pavement and dropped Sept 2014 kerbs) 1/81 Tadworth Junction of Epsom Lane Improve pedestrian safety and SCC £2K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £1K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 3 SCC Annex to South (Ashurst Road) and facilities to access the local allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB Cross Road shops and services 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward development sites come forward Programme Sept 2014 1/82 Tattenham Improve cycle pedestrian Improve safety and SCC £30K LTP/CIL – not allocated Est £22K Short term: 0-2 Funding not identified None 2 SCC Annex to Corner routes and facilities accessibility for cyclists and years from Draft R&BB pedestrians 2014 Forward Programme Sept 2014 1/83 Tadworth Tadworth Local Shopping Improve cycle parking facilities SCC £8K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £6K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 3 SCC Annex to Area – Provision of to encourage sustainable allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB additional Sheffield cycle access to local shops and 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward stands facilities development sites come forward Programme Sept 2014 1/84 Tattenham Junction A240/B2221 Improve cycling facilities to SCC £20K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £15K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to Corner Great encourage cycling as a safe allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB Tattenhams/Tattenham sustainable mode of transport 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward Way: development sites come forward Programme  Cycle improvements Sept 2014 including advanced stop lines and feeder cycle lanes – and improving links to National Cycle Route 22  Providing tactile paving on all arms of junction 1/85 Tattenham Footpath Nos. 75 and 76 Improve pedestrian safety and SCC £15K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £11K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 3 SCC Annex to Corner – Upgrading of to facilities to access local shops allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB provide an unbound ‘all and facilities 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward weather’ surface development sites come forward Programme Sept 2014 1/86 Tattenham Highway safety Improve safety and improve SCC £40K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £30K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to Corner improvements – access for pedestrians allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB improved crossing 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward facilities including development sites come forward Programme dropped crossings, Sept 2014 tactile paving and pedestrian islands:  Ruden Way (links to Nork)  Junction Burgh Heath Road / Fir Tree Road / Yew Tree Bottom Road  Shawley Way  Downland Way  Tattenham Way  Junction Epsom Lane North and Kingswood Road 1/87 Tattenham Improve cycle routes and Improve safety and SCC £57K LTP/CIL – not allocated Est £42K Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to Corner facilities accessibility for cyclists Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB collected are available and relevant Forward development sites come forward Programme Sept 2014

1/90 Walton-on- St Mere Way – resurface An important link for cyclists SCC £75K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £56K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to the-Hill BW79 between St Mere (and walkers) between Walton- allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB Road and The Avenue on-the-Hill and Tadworth (for 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward railway station) development sites come forward Programme Sept 2014 1/91 Walton-on- Highway safety Improve highway safety for all SCC £30K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £22K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 3 SCC Annex to the-Hill improvements including users and slow vehicular allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB Chequers Lane / Heath speeds down as they approach 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward Drive: the village development sites come forward Programme  Traffic calming Sept 2014 feature – priority give way build out  Footway from the junction to join up to the existing footway network towards Walton-on- the-Hill 1/92 Walton-on- Highway safety To improve access to Walton- SCC £2K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £1K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 3 SCC Annex to the-Hill improvements: Chequers on-the-Hill for pedestrians and allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB Lane / Egmont Road / vulnerable road users 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward Walton-on-the-Hill – development sites come forward Programme improved crossing Sept 2014 facilities across the junction

Woodhatch

1/93 Woodhatch Prices Lane – cycle route To encourage cycling as a safe SCC £40K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £30K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to to Sandcross Lane sustainable mode of transport allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward development sites come forward Programme Sept 2014 1/94 Woodhatch Improvements to To improve safety for SCC £32K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £24K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to pedestrian crossing pedestrians crossing allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB facilities at: 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward  Sandcross Lane, development sites come forward Programme Woodhatch Sept 2014  Pendleton Road / Fountain Road / Woodhatch Grovehill Road junction with Brighton Road

Sch/ LOCATION SCHEME NEED FOR SCHEME LEAD DELIVERY COST FUNDING GAPS IN DELIVERY RISKS TO DELIVERY CONTINGENCIES/ CRITICALITY Comments Progress Report SOURCE No AGENCY/ ARRANGEMENTS FUNDING PHASING DEPENDENCIES 1=priority 2014 MANAGEMENT 2=important ORGANISATION 3=desirable 1/95 Woodhatch Orchard Infant, St. John’s To improve safety for SCC £25K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £18K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to Primary & Dovers Green pedestrians (especially school allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB Schools - Improvements children) 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward to pedestrian access development sites come forward Programme routes including: Sept 2014  Tactile paving provision  Dropped crossings, central refuges  Improved crossing facilities 1/96 Woodhatch Improved access to bus Improve accessibility to the bus SCC £20K LTP/CIL/LEP – not Est £15K Short term: 0-2 Funding issues / To be delivered/prioritised on a 2 SCC Annex to services on Dovers Green service to encourage the use of allocated years from Insufficient CIL funds rolling basis as/where CIL funds Draft R&BB Road – bus stop facility sustainable transport modes 2014 collected are available and relevant Forward and accessibility development sites come forward Programme improvements Sept 2014 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 1/97 Borough Allotment provision High waiting lists for allotment RBBC/Horley £250k RBBC, CIL £250k Unknown Suitable sites not found No contingency as this is a not a 2 No additional sites RBBC Website wide facilities will be exacerbated by Town Council statutory function. Waiting lists have been found. new development. The PPG17 may continue to grow. Waiting lists remain study identifies a current high, and as of shortfall or 4.10 ha based on 2014, RBBC policy is 10 ha/1,000 people standard to only offer half plots, due to the high demand. 1/98 Mole Gap Mitigation of effects of Habitats regulation assessment RBBC/Surrey £60k CIL/C’side funding – not £60k Throughout Insufficient funding C’side funding from revenue 1 Schemes will be The Green to Reigate population growth on of Core Strategy identifies Wildlife allocated plan period finalised through Infrastructure Escarpment the SAC measures required to avoid Trust/National the Green Strategy is in the SAC effects on SAC – this approach Trust/Downland Infrastructure process of being is agreed with Natural England s Countryside Strategy Action Plan drafted and is due Management to be published Project alongside the Preferred Options DMP. Schemes will be reviewed as the strategy is developed. 1/99 Borough Parks and Gardens There is an identified need for RBBC £450k CIL £450k Unknown Insufficient funding None 2 Green Infrastructure The Green wide 1.5 ha in the north of the Strategy Action Plan Infrastructure Borough will explore detailed Strategy is in the options process of being drafted and is due to be published alongside the Preferred Options DMP. Schemes will be reviewed as the strategy is developed. 1/100 Borough Natural/semi-natural The PPG17 identifies that RBBC/Surrey £70k CIL £70k Unknown insufficient funding None 2 Green Infrastructure The Green wide green space ANGST standards are not met Wildlife Need to consider Strategy Action Plan Infrastructure in the Borough. In particular, Trust/Downland minimising risk of bird will explore detailed Strategy is in the the need for space close to s Countryside strike in proximity to options process of being housing developments Management Gatwick Airport drafted and is due Project/Gatwick to be published Green Space alongside the Partnership Preferred Options DMP. Schemes will be reviewed as the strategy is developed.

SCHEDULE 2: HORLEY REGENERATION INFRASTRUCTURE

2/2 Horley NE Flood plain compensation Meet national and local Sector Unknown Developer funded (s106) £0 Implementation as part of build Low risk Overseen and approved by 1 Flood plain The floodplain and NW planning policy guidance to developers to as part of North East and Environment Agency and compensation has compensation works sectors provide floodplain deliver North West Sector Borough Council been carried out for have been undertaken in compensation schemes the NES. the NES.

Floodplain compensation works in the NWS has been secured by planning condition of outline consent.

2/3 Horley Town centre public realm Identified in 2005 adopted Delivery by a Approx CIL and NGP funding Potential Two phases of public realm works have Low risk Works dependent on detailed 2 This entry has been Town improvements Local Plan and Horley Town partnership of £3m £2m been implemented to date design, safety audit and securing updated to identify a Centre (improvements to streets, Centre Regeneration SPD to RBBC and funding gap additional funding potential funding gap and safety, environment, support the regeneration of SCC the need for securing lighting, crossings etc.) the town centre additional funding. 2/4 Horley NE Delivery of recycling Identified in adopted Horley Sector Unknown Developer funded (s106) £0 To be implemented as new neighbourhood Low risk Dependent on rate of build out 2 Recycling centre in the and NW centres (NW x 1; NE x 1) Infrastructure SPD to provide developers to as part of North East and centres are built out in the NES and NWS NES has now been set sectors (capital costs) dedicated on-site recycling deliver North West Sector out. facilities for the Horley sectors schemes RBBC to Recycling centre manage provision secured in completed NWS S106.

2/5 Horley NE Delivery of on-site CCTV Identified in adopted Horley RBBC to deliver Circa Developer funded (s106) £0 Delivery at NE sector in short term; Low risk Dependent on rate of build out 2 RBBC to deliver instead of and NW (capital/revenue costs) Infrastructure SPD to provide and to manage £200,000 as part of North East and delivery at NW sector in longer-term as the and RBBC procuring works developers. sectors CCTV in neighbourhood North West Sector neighbourhood is built out. centres schemes Financial contributions towards CCTV provision secured in completed NWS S106. 2/6 Horley Real time passenger Identified in the Horley SCC to deliver Circa Developer contributions Potential RTPI to facilitate the Fastway 20 service Low risk Dependent on: rate of build, SCC 2 NWS S106 agreement is transport information Infrastructure SPD to support and to manage £1m through S106 funding gap from the NES to the town centre has been procuring works and sufficient completed but the terminals (capital/revenue the additional bus services obligations/Horley of up to installed. RTPI to facilitate high quality bus funding being available introduction of CIL could costs) linking the town centre with Tariff/CIL to pay for £560,0001 service to NWS to be delivered in short to result in a funding gap the NE/NW sectors. capital works and medium term maintenance 2/7 Horley Bus priority route (core Identified in adopted Local SCC delivered in Circa 50% of capital and Potential Schemes delivered Low risk None as delivered 2 NWS S106 agreement is route) Plan / Horley Infrastructure partnership £4.3m revenue costs to be paid funding gap completed but the (capital/revenue costs) SPD to facilitate the bus with West forward by developer of up to introduction of CIL could services linking the town Sussex funded contributions through £1.5m1 result in a funding gap centre with the NE/NW S106 obligations/Horley sectors,. including Longbridge Tariff/CIL roundabout and A23/Massetts Road 2/8 Horley NWS bus route works Identified in adopted Local SCC to deliver Circa Developer contributions £0 Dependent on build out of sector Low risk The exact work will be 2 NWS S106 agreement is (non-core route) Plan / Horley Infrastructure £700,000 through North West dependent on the route of bus completed (capital/revenue costs) SPD to facilitate the new bus Sector S106 obligations service, SCC procurement, and service to the NW sector to to pay for capital works built out rates support modal shift and maintenance

Sch/ LOCATION SCHEME NEED FOR SCHEME LEAD DELIVERY COST FUNDING GAPS IN DELIVERY PHASING RISKS CONTINGENCIES/ CRITICALITY Comments Progress Report 2014 No AGENCY/ ARRANGEMENTS FUNDING DEPENDENCIES 1=priority MANAGEMENT 2=important ORGANISATION 3=desirable 2/9 Horley NES bus service Identified in adopted Local SCC in Circa Developer contributions None Fastway 20 service commenced in 2005 Low risk 2 Ongoing provision of (running costs) Plan / Horley Infrastructure partnership £2m through North East unless the Fastway 20 service SPD to provide high quality bus with bus Sector S106 obligations bus service services for the residents of operator are to pay for running costs does not the new neighbourhood to currently become a support modal shift delivering commercial service service 2/10 Horley NWS bus service Identified in adopted Local SCC in Circa Developer contributions None Implementation dependent on build out of Low risk Successful procurement and 2 NWS S106 agreement is (running costs) Plan / Horley Infrastructure partnership £3m through North West unless the sector and procurement process build out rates will determine completed SPD to provide high quality bus with bus Sector S106 obligations bus service when service is required services for the residents of operator to to pay for running costs does not the new neighbourhood to deliver become a support modal shift commercial service 2/11 Horley Community transport Identified in adopted Local SCC/RBBC in Circa Developer contributions Potential Medium to long-term delivery Low risk Successful procurement and 2 NWS S106 agreement is services Plan / Horley Infrastructure partnership £600,000 through S106 funding gap build out rates will determine completed but the (running costs) SPD to provide transport with bus obligations/Horley of up to when service is required introduction of CIL could services for those in need sport operator to Tariff/CIL £30,0001 result in a funding gap to support modal shift deliver 2/12 Horley Horley interchange and Identified in adopted Local SCC/Network Circa Network Rail/ Potential Major works already complete; minor Low risk 2 Rail Business Award NWS S106 agreement is station (capital costs) Plan / Horley Infrastructure Rail/Southern £3.1m Southern and developer funding gap works outstanding. Expected completion in for Station completed but the SPD to provide improved Rail delivered forward contributions through of up to medium-term Excellence introduction of CIL could rail/bus interchange at Horley funded S106 obligations/Horley £1m1 result in a funding gap station to support modal shift Tariff/CIL 2/13 Horley Off site cycle and Identified in adopted Local SCC £1m Developer contributions Potential From short to long-term Low risk Dependent on S106 and the 2 NWS S106 agreement is pedestrian facilities Plan / Horley Infrastructure through S106 funding gap exact design/layout of the completed but the (capital/revenue costs) SPD to improve the cycle and obligations/Horley of up to network. introduction of CIL could pedestrian network to connect Tariff/CIL £630,0001 result in a funding gap the town centre and the new neighbourhoods with the wider Horley area to support modal shift 2/14 Horley Outdoor sports provision Identified in adopted Local RBBC to deliver £4.5m Developer contributions Potential Medium to long-term Medium risk Local Plan identified proposed 2 NWS S106 agreement is (capital/revenue costs) Plan / Horley Infrastructure through S106 funding gap Town Park site, however if this completed but the SPD to provide dedicated obligations/Horley of up to cannot be acquired, site may introduction of CIL could outdoor sports provision to Tariff/CIL £3M1 delivered in NW sector Riverside result in a funding gap meet the needs of an Green Chain expanded population 2/15 Horley NW Allotments x 3 Identified in adopted Local Sector Unknown Developer funded (s106) £0 Short to medium-term Low risk 2 First allotment site in the (capital/revenue costs) Plan / Horley Infrastructure developers to as part of North West NES was completed and SPD to provide one allotment deliver Sector scheme transferred to Horley site in the NE and two in the Town Council in 2014 NWS HTC to manage

2/16 Horley Riverside Green Chain Identified in adopted Local Sector £4m Developer provision Potential Medium to long-term Low risk Dependent on build out 2 Detailed design NWS S106 agreement is (capital/revenue costs) Plan / Horley Infrastructure developers to through S106 to lay out funding gap programme for both sectors underway for the completed but the SPD/Horley Design Guide to deliver land as public amenity of up to NES introduction of CIL could provide informal recreation space contributions circa £2m1 result in a funding gap space and to safeguard and RBBC to from development enhance the riverine manage towards site acquisition environment and build through S106/Tariff/CIL 2/17 Horley NE Local Identified in adopted Local Sector Unknown Developer provided £0 Medium to long-term Low risk Market conditions will determine 2 Commercial floorspace and NW retail provision (NE/NW) Plan / Horley Infrastructure developers to (s106) as part of North build-out rates and thus when now built in the NES and SPD to provide local shops and deliver East and North West retail units are constructed currently being marketed. services for residents in the NE Sector schemes and NW sectors NWS S106 secures retail provision in sector

Sch/ LOCATION SCHEME NEED FOR SCHEME LEAD DELIVERY COST FUNDING GAPS IN DELIVERY PHASING RISKS CONTINGENCIES/ CRITICALITY Comments Progress Report 2014 No AGENCY/ ARRANGEMENTS FUNDING DEPENDENCIES 1=priority MANAGEMENT 2=important ORGANISATION 3=desirable 2/18 Horley NE Provision of two primary Identified in adopted Local SCC to deliver Approx Developer provision Potential Medium to long-term Low risk Dependent on design, build-out 1 A one form entry primary and NW schools Plan / Horley Infrastructure £12m through S106 for two funding gap programmes and securing school was completed (capital costs) SPD to provide additional School sites and contributions of up to promoter for each school as well and opened on a site in primary places to cater for promoter to from development circa £2m1 as SCC accepting land offered in the NES in 2014. need generated from new manage towards site acquisition S106 agreements, procurement development and build through S106/Tariff/CIL 2/19 Horley NE Provision of two Identified in adopted Local Sector Circa Developer provision £0 Medium to long-term Low risk Provision dependent on when 2 Reserved matters and NW community halls Plan / Horley Infrastructure developers to £2m through North East and developer contributions come approval and listed (capital/revenue costs) SPD to provide community deliver North West Sector S106 forward, (build out rates/ S106 building consent granted facilities for NE and NW sectors agreements and some triggers), planning approvals for new community hall Management to contributions towards in the NES be agreed management/maintena nce 2/20 Horley Secondary School Identified in adopted Local SCC to deliver £6.8m Developer contributions Potential Medium to long-term Low risk Provision dependent on the need 1 NWS S106 agreement is provision Plan / Horley Infrastructure from development: funding gap generated locally, when funding completed but the (capital costs) SPD to provide more S106/Tariff/CIL of up to comes forward (build out rates/ introduction of CIL could secondary/post 16 school £4.7m1 S106 triggers), planning result in a funding gap places to cater for need approvals and procurement generated from new development 2/21 Horley NE Delivery of play space Identified in adopted Local Delivery by Circa Developer funded (s106) £0 NE in the short to medium-term and NW in Low risk Provision dependent on: build 2 Many play areas in NES and NW including a LAP, LEAP, Plan / Horley Infrastructure Development £3m as part of North East and the medium to long-term out rates, S106 triggers; and have now been built MUGA/NEAP and SPD to provide play space for Consortiums (includin North West Sector planning approvals additional play space NE and NW sectors g schemes (capital/revenue costs) To be managed maintena by RBBC nce) 2/22 Horley New leisure centre Identified in adopted Local RBBC delivered Circa 71% funding from SCC Potential Completed 2012 Low risk Facility built but developer 2 NWS S106 agreement is (capital/revenue costs) Plan / Horley Infrastructure £9m and 29% funding from funding gap contributions dependent on build completed but the SPD to provide new indoor (RBBC/GLL development: of up to out rates; S106 triggers; planning introduction of CIL could sports provision for residents manage S106/Tariff/CIL £2.9m1 approvals result in a funding gap of Horley currently) 2/23 Horley Day provision Identified in adopted Local Delivery by Circa 71% funding from SCC Potential Medium to long-term Low risk Provision dependent on when 2 NWS S106 agreement is NE/NW (capital/revenue costs) Plan / Horley Infrastructure RBBC £200,000 and 29% funding from funding gap funding comes forward (build completed but the SPD to provide enhanced day development: of up to out rates/ S106 triggers) and introduction of CIL could centre provision in Horley for To be managed S106/Tariff/CIL £150,0001 internal RBBC resources result in a funding gap the over 50s by RBBC 2/24 Horley NW New medical centre in NW Identified in adopted Local Clinical Circa Site to be secured Unknown Long-term Medium risk Dependent on Clinical 2 Site for a medical centre sector Plan/Horley Infrastructure SPD Commissioning £750,000 through North West Commissioning Group need and secured through NWS (capital costs) to provide improved Group to Sector S106 and take up of site S106 agreement healthcare facilities in Horley deliver marketed to health providers to take up and build

2/25 Horley NW Delivery of a faith centre Identified in adopted Local Faith sector to Unknown Site to be secured Unknown Long-term Medium risk Dependent on take up of site and 2 Site for a faith centre (capital costs) Plan/Horley Infrastructure SPD deliver through North West the ability of faith sectors to secured through NWS to provide a site for local Sector S106 and raise funds to acquire site and S106 agreement community based religious marketed to faith sector. build centre groups Faith Sector to take up and build

2/26 Horley New library Identified in 2005 adopted SCC to deliver £3m 71% funding from SCC Potential Medium to long-term Medium Provision dependent on when 2 NWS S106 agreement is town (capital costs) Local Plan/Horley and 29% funding from funding gap developer contributions come completed but the centre Infrastructure SPD to improve development: of up to forward, (build out rates/ S106 introduction of CIL could community facilities in Horley S106/Tariff/CIL £750,0001 triggers), securing a site, SCC result in a funding gap resources, planning approvals 2/27 Horley Horley Young People’s Identified in 2005 adopted SCC to deliver £1.4m 71% funding from SCC Potential Facility complete Low risk N/a 2 NWS S106 agreement is town Centre Local Plan/Horley and 29% funding from funding gap completed but the centre (capital costs) Infrastructure SPD to provide a Raven Housing development: of up to introduction of CIL could facility for young people in Association to S106/Tariff/CIL £250,0001 result in a funding gap Horley manage

Sch/ LOCATION SCHEME NEED FOR SCHEME LEAD DELIVERY COST FUNDING GAPS IN DELIVERY PHASING RISKS CONTINGENCIES/ CRITICALITY Comments Progress Report 2014 No AGENCY/ ARRANGEMENTS FUNDING DEPENDENCIES 1=priority MANAGEMENT 2=important ORGANISATION 3=desirable 2/28 Horley NE NES Link Road – Langshott Identified in 2005 adopted Sector Circa Developer provision £0 Road built Low risk Controlled by planning condition 1 Link road completed to Cross Oak Lane Local Plan/Horley developers to £1.9m through North East and dependent on build out rates and in the process (capital costs) Infrastructure SPD to provide a deliver Sector S106/278 of being adopted by link road from Cross Oak Lane agreement SCC to the new neighbourhood SCC to adopt 2/29 Horley NE A23 /Cross Oak Lane Identified in Horley Sector Circa Developer provision £0 Improvements built Low risk Controlled by S106 trigger and 1 Junction works junction Infrastructure SPD to provide a developers to £125,000 through North East dependent on build out rates completed (capital costs) new junction deliver Sector S106/38 agreement SCC to adopt 2/30 Horley NW NWS Link Road to A217 Identified in 2005 adopted Sector Circa Developer provision £0 Short term Low risk Controlled by planning condition 1 Secured by planning (capital costs) Local Plan/Horley developers to £3m through North West and to be substantially condition of outline Infrastructure SPD to provide a deliver Sector S106/278 completed prior to any consent for NWS. link road from A217 to the agreement occupations on site. Depends on new neighbourhood SCC to adopt build out and consents Planning consent for temporary haul road. 2/31 Horley NW A217/new link road Identified in 2005 adopted Sector Circa Developer provision £0 Short term Low risk Controlled by planning condition 1 Secured by planning junction Local Plan/Horley developers to £700,000 through North West and to be substantially condition of outline (capital costs) Infrastructure SPD to provide a deliver Sector S106/38 completed prior to any consent for NWS new junction agreement occupations on site. Depends on SCC to adopt build out and consents 2/32 Horley NW A23/new link road junction Identified in 2005 adopted Sector Circa Developer provision £0 Medium term Low risk Controlled by planning condition 1 Secured by planning (capital costs) Local Plan/Horley developers to £500,000 through North West and to be substantially condition of outline Infrastructure SPD to provide a deliver Sector S106/38 completed prior to 600th consent for NWS new junction agreement occupation. Depends on build SCC to adopt out and consents 2/33 Horley NW NWS Link Road to A23 Identified in 2005 adopted Sector Circa Developer provision £0 Medium term Low risk Controlled by planning condition 1 Secured by planning (capital costs) Local Plan/Horley developers to £3m through North West and to be substantially condition of outline Infrastructure SPD to provide a deliver Sector S106/278 completed prior to 600th consent for NWS link road from A23 to the new agreement occupation. Depends on build neighbourhood SCC to adopt out and consents 2/34 Horley NE NES traffic calming Identified in Horley SCC to deliver £44,000 Developer contributions £0 Medium term Low risk Depends on scheme 2 (capital costs) Infrastructure SPD to provide through North West design/procuring works. traffic calming on residential Sector S106 obligations roads 2/35 Horley NW NWS traffic calming Identified in Horley SCC to deliver £185,000 Developer contributions £0 Long term Low risk Depends on scheme design. 2 Contributions have (capital costs) Infrastructure SPD to provide through North West been secured traffic calming on residential Sector S106 obligations through completed roads S106 2/36 Horley Off site junction works Identified in Horley SCC to deliver £790,000 North East & North West Potential Medium to Long term Low risk Depends on scheme 1 NWS S106 (capital costs) Infrastructure SPD to provide Sector s106 funding gap design/procuring agreement is off site junction works on agreements/Horley of up to works/sufficient funding completed but the A23/Three Arch Rd and Tariff/CIL £600,0001 introduction of CIL A217/A2044 Woodhatch could result in a funding gap 2/37 Horley Subway works Identified in Horley SCC to deliver in £660,000 North East & North West Potential Medium term Low risk Depends on scheme 2 NWS S106 (capital costs) Infrastructure SPD and Horley partnership Sector s106 funding gap design/agreement with Network agreement is Town Centre Regeneration SPD with agreements/Horley of up to Rail and Southern procuring completed but the to undertake improvements in RBBC/Network Tariff/CIL £440,0001 works/sufficient funding introduction of CIL town centre to improve Rail/Southern could result in a pedestrian and cycle links funding gap.

Some works have been undertaken including drainage and resurfacing.

______1 A potential funding gap figure of up to an estimated maximum amount, has been provided for this entry, in order to take account of the possibility that the currently completed North West Sector S106 agreement securing funding is not implemented, should the case be that the developer chooses to meet infrastructure requirements via the newly introduced Community Infrastructure Levy, rather than the S106 Agreement.

SCHEDULE 3: MERSTHAM REGENERATION INFRASTRUCTURE

SCHEDULE 4: PRESTON REGENERATION INFRASTRUCTURE

No. LOCATION SCHEME NEED FOR SCHEME LEAD DELIVERY COST FUNDING GAPS IN DELIVERY PHASING RISKS CONTINGENCIES/ CRITICALITY Comments Progress Report 2014 AGENCY/ ARRANGEMENTS FUNDING DEPENDENCIES 1=priority MANAGEMENT 2=important ORGANISATION 3=desirable 4/1 Merland Recreation ground To improve the quality of the RBBC £400K S106 from Croudace £0 Before completion of new Leisure and None Contingencies: reduce scope of 1 This entry has been Rise enhancements including open space and youth/play (Merland Rise housing Community Centre improvements; seek additional updated to reflect the Recreation NEAP facilities to improve social and development) external funding. Reprioritise increase in cost, and that Ground health outcomes other Preston regeneration funding has been secured programme funding. from the developer via a s106. There are no longer any risks to delivery since the price has already been agreed for the sale of development sites. 4/2 Banstead New Leisure and Improved leisure facilities RBBC (GLL £11m RBBC budget allocated £0 Due to complete August 2015 Cost overruns / Budget and programme managed 1 Instead of the Leisure Community Centre and serving the north of the managed site) (asset sale funds)/Surrey delivery delays by RBBC rebuild/refurbishment of Centre/ Youth Centre to replace borough important to ensure County Council/Sport the Leisure Centre Community Banstead Leisure Centre, successful community and England/s106 of previously planned, the Centre/ Tattenhams Community health outcomes Merland Rise and De local facilities will be Youth Centre, and Phoenix Youth Burgh schemes replaced by a new centre Centre Centre funded from a number of sources. 4/3 De Burgh Local Area for Play (LAP) Play area needed to cater for RBBC, Circa CIL £0 In line with site development Developer Requires inclusion in Planning 2 The Preston Planning site young children in new developer £50k distress Framework to enforce at Framework approved in development application/build stage April 2012 requires the provision of outdoor play areas within the De Burgh site and surrounding area, or a contribution in relation to the development proposed will be sought. 4/4 Preston Improvements to parking, Identified in Masterplan to RBBC/SCC Circa RBBC/SCC asset sales / £0 From 2013/14 for 3 + years Subject to Agree Planning Framework, 2 The Preston Planning pedestrian access and accommodate housing growth £2m capital reserves planning including prioritization of Framework approved in public realm and improve quality of life for /Developer funded Property schemes April 2012, will address the residents (s106) as part of market improvements required. Merland Rise and De conditions This entry has been Burgh schemes updated to reflect the reduction in cost and revised delivery phasing. 4/5 B2221/ Junction modifications – Traffic modeling shows that SCC £90k Asset sale funds/ CIL £0 Following capital receipt from sale of site Subject to Development conditional on 1 This entry has been A240 re-aligning and signal this junction is nearing capacity planning delivery of scheme updated to reflect the Junction rephrasing and will not be able to Property reduction in cost, and that accommodate new growth market the Preston Planning without alteration conditions Framework has been agreed. 4/6 General Travel Strategy for new Package of ‘soft’ measures to Developer Not Developer funded (S106) £0 In line with occupation of new Developer CIL funding 2 A s106 agreement is development mitigate traffic impact from costed as part of planning development distress already in place with development permission/ conditions Croudace. 4/7 Burgh Installation of a To improve sustainable travel RBBC Circa SCC capital / RBBC £0 Winter 2014/15 Ecological Ecological surveys undertaken. 2 Heath / compacted gravel lit options to secondary school, £200k capital / s106 as part of constraints Method statements prepared. Chetwode footpath connecting retail, public transport. Merland Rise and De Road / A240 Chetwode Road to A240. Burgh schemes Footway improvements along A240 to pedestrian crossing by ASDA

SCHEDULE 5: REDHILL REGENERATION INFRASTRUCTURE

Sch/ LOCATION SCHEME NEED FOR SCHEME LEAD DELIVERY COST FUNDING GAPS IN DELIVERY PHASING RISKS CONTINGENCIES/ CRITICALITY Comments Progress Report 2014 No. AGENCY/ ARRANGEMENTS FUNDING DEPENDENCIES 1=priority MANAGEMENT 2=important ORGANISATION 3=desirable 5/1 Various District Heating Network Allow the Council to contribute RBBC, Not ESCO to provide, Site 0 2 years Lack of interest No contingencies other than 3 Preferred option is possibilities Energy Centre to creating a low-carbon Regeneration costed host needed or viability from installation of biomass boilers for for an anchor site to future, taking advantage of Forum, Private ESCO and/or individual sites with modular host and construct opportunities within Redhill Sector, ESCO site owners, Air capacity to allow future in modular fashion Town Centre. Quality issues connection to allow for with stack expansion 5/2 Redhill Air Quality Monitoring Action Plan of works is being RBBC Not RBBC funds/ CIL 0 5+ years Conflict with Action plan developed in 2 Currently Monitoring work on-going, Town Area Management Plan developed in response to costed Regeneration consultation with Redhill developing this to ensure that pollution Centre Redhill’s recent designation as strategy Regeneration team levels are not rising as a an AQMA development result of development and are in line with forecast levels. 5/3 Station Urban Realm Improvements to the public Developers, Circa Developer funded (s106) 0 Spring 2012 None Underway 2 The scheme was Road (West Improvements realm to attract businesses and RBBC £335k as part of completed completed on time in End) shoppers Nobel House scheme Spring 2012. 5/4 Station Urban Realm Improvements to the public RBBC Up to NGP funding already 0 2-3 years None None 2 The cost has increased – Road (East Improvements, new realm to attract businesses and £1m committed / s106 previously it was £800k. End) paving, better pedestrian shoppers and improve (already secured) The scheme is currently access pedestrian accessibility underway and due for completion in March 2015. 5/5 Warwick Move shopfronts forward Improvement to public realm Aviva (head Unknown As part of private 0 Long term 5+ years Aviva do not Planning permission. 3 Quadrant along London Road and and increase retail floorspace lessee) redevelopment progress project South Station Road elevations 5/6 Warwick Urban Realm Supermarket Aviva/ 850k Developer funded (s106) 0 2 years Supermarket None 2 Demolition works began in Quadrant Improvements – Harlequin expansion/development Sainsbury’s as part of Warwick does not October 2014 to enable North canopy and London Road Quadrant (Sainsbury’s) progress plans. the extension of declutter scheme Sainsbury’s. 5/7 Between Urban Realm Need to improve the SCC £0.5m CIL £0.5m Long term – 5+ years Development Depends on development at 2 SCC is now the sole lead Reading Improvements connectivity under the railway est on Reading Reading Arch Road. Cooperation delivery agency. Some Arch Rd and bridge to connect the Arch Road does from rail bridge owner. No small improvements have High Street important Reading Arch Road not progress at contingencies. been made by the site to the shopping area of the sufficient scale Balanced Network on the Town Centre Belfry roundabout. 5/8 Various “Grot Spots” initiative to Series of small and medium RBBC, SCC, Up to Small scale operations 0 Short/mid term 1-5 years Availability of None 2 These are complete in the town centre improve physical scale measures which together private sector circa absorbed mostly within funding, most part, with only 2 locations appearance and function can make a large difference to partners £250k revenue-funded securing specified sites outstanding, of 12 specified sites within the quality of the environment activities by RBBC & SCC. agreement over due to ownership issues. the town centre area Private sector voluntary sites in multiple contributions. ownership 5/9 Station Urban realm Important ‘entrance’ to town SCC/RBBC £50k+ DfT/LSTF funding 0 From 2013 Safety audit and Depends on progression of 5/27 1 This scheme is currently Underpass/ improvements: reduction centre but currently unsightly, detailed & 5/28 below to release highway underway and due for Noke Drive from 3 highway lanes to 2. as part of the Balanced feasibility study capacity completion in March 2015. Network scheme. yet to be carried out 5/10 High St/ Urban realm Improve pedestrian SCC/RBBC £100k est DfT/LSTF funding 0 Short/mid term 1-5 years Cost and 1 This scheme is currently Marketfield improvements: footway connectivity as part of the viability underway and due for Way upgrade. Balanced Network scheme completion in March 2015. 5/11 Redstone Urban realm Improve pedestrian/cycle SCC/RBBC/ £100k est DfT/LSTF funding 0 Short/mid term 1-5 years Cost and 1 Hill/ improvements: footpath connectivity from potential Network Rail viability Marketfield upgrade new car park to town centre as Way part of the Balanced Network scheme 5/12 Marketfield Flood attenuation works To mitigate surface water flood Developer £300k To be provided by Unknown Short-mid term following approval of a Cost and Redevelopment of Marketfield 1 A scheme at the site is Way risk to enable delivery of a developer as part of viable scheme and willing developer viability Way cannot go ahead without currently under scheme on site Marketfield Way scheme this negotiation, and a planning application is anticipated to be submitted by June 2015. 5/13 Gloucester Flood attenuation works To mitigate surface water flood RBBC/ Unknown To be provided by Unknown Following site sale to developer and Cost and Redevelopment of Gloucester 1 Road risk to enable delivery of a Developer developer as part of approval of a viable scheme viability Road site cannot go ahead scheme on site and improve Gloucester Road scheme without this the flood resilience of the wider town centre

Sch/ LOCATION SCHEME NEED FOR SCHEME LEAD DELIVERY COST FUNDING GAPS IN DELIVERY PHASING RISKS CONTINGENCIES/ CRITICALITY Comments Progress Report 2014 No. AGENCY/ ARRANGEMENTS FUNDING DEPENDENCIES 1=priority MANAGEMENT 2=important ORGANISATION 3=desirable 5/14 Colebrook Flood attenuation works To mitigate flood risk from SCC/Developer Unknown To be provided by Unknown Following site sale to developer and Cost and Redevelopment of site cannot go 1 Site Redhill Brook to enable developer as part of approval of a viable scheme viability ahead without this delivery of a scheme on site Colebrook scheme and improve the flood resilience of the wider town centre. 5/15 Memorial Park improvement project Limited run down facilities. RBBC £1.6m NGP/s106/Travel 0 3 years HLF bid fails Depends on completion of Phase 1 Project completed October Park Improvements to the Toilets, SMART/Sport England 1 flood works & success of HLF 2014 with a higher cost Café, Replanting bid than previously estimated. New café, play area and sports facilities in place. 5/16 Memorial Drainage and Flood Flood storage and attenuation RBBC, N/A NGP 0 Decision by Spring 2012, completion by Low risk – Depends on cost/benefit 2 CBA showed more cost Park Attenuation works within Park are an Environment Spring 2013 funding already analysis. Non progression effective to undertake site opportunity to help mitigate Agency committed requires individual site-by-site by site attenuation. flooding within the Town flood attenuation works Project closed and funding Centre reallocated to Park Improvement Project 5/15. 5/17 Memorial Park and Green Space Rehabilitation of the park RBBC N/A NGP/RBBC 0 Immediately following completion of 12 Low risk – Depends on completion of Phase 2 CBA showed more cost Park Improvements environment following flood above. funding already 1 flood works effective to undertake site attenuation works committed by site attenuation. Project closed and funding reallocated to Park Improvement Project 5/15. 5/18 Redhill Parking Management Package of measures to RBBC, SCC, £200k LSTF bid/NGP/ S106 0 2-3 years LSTF bid Political support for measures 2 RBBC currently This scheme is currently Measures manage parking within the private sector (already secured) unsuccessful chosen/adopted. consulting on under development. town as a whole. partners and funds are measures prioritised elsewhere 5/19 Town New style urban Smaller, sleeker substations in UK Power £90k UK Power Networks/ 0 1 year Insufficient Success of pilot project with shell 3 Centre substations urban areas with less land-take Networks SCC funding in place and maintenance 5/20 Marketfield Move electricity substation Substation is currently located UK Power £400k+ To be provided by 0 Short/mid term 1-5 years Low risk May not be necessary to replace 2 Necessary to enable A scheme at the site is Way within developable part of site Networks developer as part of if 5/19 above is progressed. development at currently under Marketfield Way scheme Removal necessary to enable Marketfield Way negotiation, and a Marketfield Way development planning application is anticipated to be submitted by June 2015. 5/21 Redhill Flood Alleviation Scheme To reduce the likelihood and Environment £875K Defra (Grant in Aid)/CIL Circa 1-5 years Cost and 1 A scheme is consequences of flooding to Agency/SCC/ £400K viability presently being Redhill town centre RBBC investigated to consider the potential to increase flood storage upstream of Redhill town centre – further details of this project will be known by June 2015 (info provided by EA) TRANSPORT 5/22 Various Electric charging points Will promote greater use of SCC/RBBC/UK Up to Unknown £50k In line with development of regeneration Unviable due to Early work with developers and 3 SCC are currently electric vehicles and also Power £50k per sites existing power providers to build EV considering sites for the address air quality issues Networks station electricity charging points into installation of EV charge infrastructure redevelopment proposals points in Redhill, Consort House, East Surrey College, and Donyngs this financial year.

5/28 A25 in town Balanced Network: A25 Package of measures to SCC/RBBC Circa RBBC/SCC 0 Commence 2013 Bid failure. Linked to 5/27 above. 1 This forms part of This scheme is currently centre two-way working provide a comprehensive £750k Absence of Investigate subsequent bidding the Balanced underway and is expected solution to Redhill’s traffic traffic measures opportunities and/or use of Network package of to be completed by March issues whilst providing cycle, is a constraint alternative resources for funding transport measures 2015. pedestrian & urban realm to growth in event of GPF bid failure. improvements Requires cooperation from Belfry Centre. 5/29 Station Balanced Network: Reduction in road/vehicle SCC/RBBC Circa RBBC/SCC 0 Commence 2013 Bid failure. Depends on schemes above to 1 This forms part of This scheme is currently Roundabout Reconfiguration of dominance and improvement £700k Absence of release sufficient highway the Balanced underway and is expected pedestrian crossings, of linkages/desire lines traffic measures capacity to carry out this scheme. Network package of to be completed by March reduction of diameter between rail station and town is a constraint transport measures 2015. from 33m to 15m centre to growth 5/30 Marketfield Toucan Crossing Improvement of pedestrian SCC/RBBC Circa RBBC/SCC 0 By 2016 Bid failure Depends on schemes above to 1 This forms part of This scheme is currently Way linkage from Redstone Hill to £60k release sufficient highway the Balanced underway and is expected town centre capacity to carry out this scheme. Network package of to be completed by March transport measures 2015. 5/31 Redstone Installation of a small Improve traffic flow and safety SCC/RBBC Circa RBBC/SCC 0 1 This forms part of This scheme is currently Hill roundabout & Cavendish at junction £75k the Balanced underway and is expected Road made one-way Network package of to be completed by March towards Redstone Hill transport measures 2015. 5/32 Warwick Refurbishment of the Works needed to maintain RBBC £300k RBBC (funding allocated) 0 1-2 years None No contingencies/dependencies 3 This scheme was Quadrant Harlequin Theatre and town centre entertainment completed in 2013. South Cinema facility and attract more visitors 5/33 Rail Station New “Platform 0” on west Improve service capacity and Network Rail £8m Network Rail 0 Expected to commence 2014 or earlier Low risk – No contingencies 1 This scheme is on-going side of line address current bottleneck at within NW’s and programmed for Redhill. Allow 12+ car trains to business plan delivery in the current stop and funding Network Rail control already partially period (no. 5) committed