DOCSLIB.ORG

(O-'3(-L9 Department Director Date

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(O-'3(-L9 Department Director Date Agenda Item #3K-3 PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: December 3, 2019 Consent [X] Regular [ ] Public Hearing [ ] Department: Water Utilities Department I. EXECUTIVE BRIEF Motion and Title: Staff recommends motion to approve: Amendment No. 2 to the Contract for Consulting/Professional Services Lift Station Rehabilitation Project B (Contract) with Mock, Roos & Associates, Inc. (Consultant) to extend the project schedule by 486 calendar days and increase the not to exceed amount by $198,766.92. Summary: On September 13, 2016, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved the Water Utilities Department (WUD) Contract (R2016-1172) with Consultant to provide engineering services during the design, permitting, bidding and construction phases for the Lift Station Rehabilitation Project B (Project) which includes the rehabilitation of sixty (60) lift stations. Amendment No. 2 to the Contract provides for the performance of additional project management, survey, engineering design and permitting support services as requested by WUD. These additional services are related to revised requirements occurring after the Contract was executed. This Contract was procured under the requirements of the 2002 Small Business Enterprise (SBE) Ordinance (R2002-0064) prior to the adoption of the new Equal Business Opportunity Ordinance on October 16, 2018. The SBE participation goal established by the 2002 SBE Ordinance was 15% overall participation. The Contract provides for 96% SBE participation. Amendment No. 2 includes an overall SBE participation of 100%. The cumulative SBE participation including Amendment No. 2 is 100%. Consultant is a Palm Beach County company. The Project is included in the WUD FY20 budget. (WUD Project No. 15-096B) Countywide (MJ) Background and Justification: During the Consultant's completion of their design efforts for Bid Package No. 2, several revised requirements resulted in impacts to the project delivery schedule. Survey services are needed to support documentation requirements associated with obtaining five (5) easements. Electrical engineering services are needed to support the improvements at sixteen (16) lift stations. Other engineering services are needed to support the incorporation of a significant revision to WUD's standard specification into the remaining design submittals and bid documents for Bid Package No. 2 and to address recent changes in the Palm Beach County Right-pf-Way permit requirements. Attachments: 1. Three (3) Originals of Amendment No. 2 2. Location Map 3. Certificate of Liability Insurance Recommended By: (o-'3(-l9 Department Director Date Approved By: Date II. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. Five Year Summary of Fiscal Impact: Fiscal Years 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Capital Expenditures i1982767 Q Q Q Q Operating Costs 0 Q Q Q Q External Revenues Q Q Q Q Q Program Income (County) Q ·Q Q Q Q In-Kind Match County Q Q Q Q Q NET FISCAL IMPACT $198.767 Q Q Q Q # ADDITIONAL FTE POSITIONS (Cumulative) Q Q Q Q Q Budget Account No.: Fund 4011 Dept 721 Unit W031 Object 6546 Is Item Included in Current Budget? Yes X No Does this item include the use of federal funds? Yes No X Reporting Category N/A B. Recommended Sources of Funds/Summary of Fiscal Impact: C. Ill. REVIEW COMMENTS A. OFMB Fiscal and/or Contract Development and Control Comments: B. C. Other Department Review: Department Director This summary is not to be used as a basis for payment. AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CONTRACT FOR CONSULTING/PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIFT STATION REHABILITATION PROJECT B COOS PROJECT NO. WUD 15-0968 This Amendment is made as of the ____day of______20_, by and between Palm Beach County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, by and through its Board of County Commissioners, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY, and Mock, Roos & Associates, Inc. [] an individual, [ ] a partnership, [X] a corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTANT, whose Federal I.D. is 59-0878800. In.consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the COUNTY and the CONSULTANT agree that the Contract for Consulting/Professional Services entered into by the parties on September 13, 2016, and referenced by County Resolution Number R2016-1172 , as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated April 10, 2018, and referenced by County Resolution Number R2018-0555 (hereinafter "the Contract"), is amended as follows: 1. Additional services shall be provided pursuant to Exhibit A2 which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. The pricing as depicted in the Contract is not changed. Exhibit 82, Fee Schedule to the Contract is not modified by this Amendment. 3. The compensation in the Contract was a not-to-exceed fee of $1,846,359.43. The not-to­ exceed amount is hereby increased by $198,766.92 from $1,846,359.43 to $2,045,126.35 as presented in Exhibit C2 which only depicts the increased amount for the additional services, and which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 4. The project schedule as depicted in the Contract was to be completed in 1,834 days. Exhibit D2, Project Schedule to the Contract is hereby increased by 486 days from 1,834 days to 2,320 days as presented in Exhibit D2. 5. The OEBO Schedule 1 and Schedule 2 documents are presented in Exhibit E2 attached hereto and made a part hereof for the additional services presented in this Amendment. All other provisions in the Contract remain unchanged and in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Palm Beach County, Florida has made and executed this Amendment No. 2 on Behalf of the COUNTY and CONSULTANT has hereunto set its hand the day and year above written. F:\_PROPOSALS\pbcu\B5044.00_PBC Lift Station\Amendment No. 2\Mock Roos Contract-20191014.doc AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CONTRACT FOR CONSULTING/PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIFT STATION REHABILITATION PROJECT B COOS PROJECT NO. WUD 15-0968 ATTEST: PALM BEACH COUNTY, BY ITS SHARON R. BOCK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CLERK & COMPTROLLER By:_________ JJ By:----------­ Deputy Clerk Mayor 101i1lr\ WITNESS: Debra C. McCray, Corporate Secretary Thomas A. Biggs, P.E., Executive Vice President Name (Type or Print) Name (Type or Print) Mock, Roos & Associates, Inc. Firm Corporate Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM APPROVED AS TO TERMS AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY AND CONDITIONS By:---------­ By:<\~~ Assistant County Attorney epartment Director F:\_PROPOSALS\pbcu\85044.00_PBC Lift Station\Amendment No. 2\Mock Roos Contract-20191014.doc Exhibit A2 Scope of Services EXIIlBITA2 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CONTRACT FOR CONSULTING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIFT STATION REHABILITATION PROJECT B CD08 PROJECT NO. WUD 15-096B The SCOPE OF WORK is hereby amended as follows: Task 3.3 - Sketch & Legal - Easement Work The original contract was based on the CONSULTANT preparing twenty (20) sketches and legal descriptions for the COUNTY's use recording easements. The CONSULTANT will provide the services of a surveyor licensed in the state of Florida to prepare up to an additional five (5) sketch and legal descriptions for the COUNTY's use to record easements. Three (3) hard copies of all sketch and legal descriptions will be provided. The original contract was also based on the assumption that the COUNTY would prepare preliminary sketches for Foresight Communications & Consulting, Inc. (Foresight) to engage property owners for lift stations that are to have easements requested. This is the process that was used for Bid Package 1; however, the COUNTY has requested that the CONSULTANT prepare the preliminary sketches for Foresight to use with the easement acquisition process associated with Bid Package 2. The CONSULTANT will prepare up to twenty (20) 8.5"x11" sketches and revise each sketch up to three (3) times. A PDF of each of the sketches will be provided to the COUNTY and Foresight. Task 4.0 - Geotechnical Investigation The original contract was based on the CONSULTANT preparing subsurface explorations and geotechnical studies to obtain subsurface soil information necessary for the proper design of a new lift station control panel support structure. The work includes one (1) standard penetration test to a depth of 10 feet for five (5) lift stations where geotechnical information is required for designing the lift station improvements. The borings will be performed in general accordance with procedures recommended in American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D-1586, using a truck-mounted drilling rig. A geotechnical report summarizing the results of the boring will be made available to potential bidders for informational purposes only. The report will include the location and depth of the borings, visual classification of the recovered samples, and compressive strength test results on rock as necessary. The hours estimated during the scoping for this task in the original contract were sufficient to complete the task. The hours for this line item are being reduced to reflect the actual work required to complete this task since this task is now complete. Task 5.7 - Bid Package 2: Electrical Design The original contract was based on the assumption that forty (40) of the sixty (60) lift stations selected in Bid Package 1 and Bid Package 2 projects would receive electrical improvements; however, fifty-six (56) lift stations selected for rehabilitation are receiving electrical improvements. The CONSULTANT will provide the design of electrical improvements for an additional sixteen (16) lift stations including up to two (2) additional generators. F:\_PROPOSALS\pbcu\85044.00_PBC Lift Station\Amendment No. 2\Mock Roos Contract-20191014.doc Task 5.9- Bid Package 2: 100% Design Submittal The COUNTY issued a significant revision to the COUNTY's standard specifications that are to be incorporated into the contract documents for Bid Package 2. At the COUNTY's request, the CONSULTANT will review and incorporate the COUNTY's new standard specifications into the 100% Submittal for Bid Package 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OSH-Training and Education Fiscal Review Guide
    Page 1 Contractor Assistance Program (CAP) Guide Hazard Abatement Board (HAB) Occupational Health and Safety- Training and Education Grants (OSH T&E) The goal of the OSH T&E Program is to promote safe and healthful conditions in the workplace through training, education, and other proven preventive programs designed to: • Identify, evaluate, and control safety and health hazards in the workplace; • Encourage voluntary compliance with occupational safety and health regulations; • Foster activities by employers and employees intended to prevent workplace accidents, injuries and illnesses; and • Make employers and employees more aware of the NYS Right-to-know Law and other regulations which mandate training and education on toxic substances in the workplace. The purpose of the Occupational Safety and Health – Training and Education Grants (OSH T&E) grant is to secure the services of eligible Public and Private Employers (must employ one or more individuals beyond self- employment); Labor Organizations or their Federations; Trade Associations; Non-profit Organizations; and Educational Institutions to provide training for general or hazard-specific training on how to identify, evaluate and control employee exposure to workplace hazards; Activities intended to improve the effectiveness of labor-management safety and health committees; Programs designed specifically to reduce workplace accidents by teaching lockout/tagout procedures, safe electrical work practices, methods of working safely in confined spaces, etc., where not readily available
    [Show full text]
  • Ceo Report May 2017 Our Mission
    CEO REPORT MAY 2017 OUR MISSION The Virginia Railway Express, a joint project of the Northern Virginia Transportation Commission and the Potomac Rappahannock Transportation Commission, will provide safe, cost-effective, accessible, reliable, convenient, and customer responsive commuter-oriented rail passenger service. VRE contributes to the economic vitality of its member jurisdictions as an integral part of a balanced, intermodal regional transportation system. OUR MISSIONTABLE OF CONTENTS CEO REPORT | MAY 2017 2 Success at a Glance 3 On-Time Performance 5 Ridership 6 Summonses 7 Train Utilization 8 Parking Utilization 9 Financial Report 10 FY 2017 Year End Financial Projection 12 Capital Projects Updates – Lorton Platform Extension – Arkendale to Powell’s Creek Third Track Project – Quantico Station – Alexandria Pedestrian Tunnel Project – Lifecycle Overhaul and Upgrade Facility – L’Enfant (North) Storage Track Wayside Power Construction – L’Enfant (South) Storage Track Wayside Power – Franconia-Springfield Station Improvements (Penta-Platform Program) – Lorton Second Platform (Penta-Platform Program) – Rippon Station Improvements (Penta-Platform Program) – Brooke Station Improvements (Penta-Platform Program) – Leeland Road Station Improvements (Penta-Platform Program) – Midday Storage Replacement Facility – Rolling Road Platform Extension – Crossroads Real Estate Acquisition – Manassas Line Expansion/Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Study 16 Facilities Update 17 Upcoming Procurements 18 Projects Progress Report 22 Notes MAY 2017 | TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SUCCESS AT A GLANCE 0% 0K 80% 7 80 1 % % 15 90 60 K % 9 % 0 0 % K 7 % 5 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 % 0 % % % K 0 0 0 PARKING AVERAGE DAIL Y ON-TIME UTILIZATION RIDERSHIP PERFORMANCE The total number of parking spaces The average number of boardings each Percentage of trains that arrive at used in the VRE system during the operating day inclusive of Amtrak Step-Up their destination within five minutes month, divided by the total number of boardings but excluding “S” schedule of the schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • AGREEMENT Between the CITY of FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA and {Name of Firm} for PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES for SMALL AREA PLANS
    AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA and {Name of Firm} for PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR SMALL AREA PLANS THIS IS AN AGREEMENT made as of _____ {date} _________ between The City of Fairfax, Virginia, a Virginia municipal corporation, (“CITY”) and {Name of Firm} (“CONSULTANT”). CITY intends to utilize CONSULTANT to individual assignments necessary to provide for a Project, or series of Projects together which shall comprise the “Program”. CITY and CONSULTANT in consideration of their mutual covenants herein, agree as follows concerning professional services by CONSULTANT with respect to the Program and the payment for those services by CITY as set forth below. Execution of this Agreement by CONSULTANT and CITY constitutes CITY’s written authorization to CONSULTANT to provide Multi-phase Professional Services for each Project which will be described and defined in conjunction with the CITY’s Scope of Work and CONSULTANT’S Work Plan. This Agreement will become effective upon issuance of the first CITY Purchase Order. CONSULTANT shall commitment to be legally obligated for each assignment awarded by a CITY Purchase Order. SECTION 1 – GENERAL 1.1 Standard of Performance. CONSULTANT shall provide CITY professional services and related work in all aspects of the Program to which this Agreement applies as hereinafter provided and in concert with Standard of Care as defined in Section 1.4.7. CONSULTANT shall serve as CITY’s professional representative for each Project under the Program. CONSULTANT may employ such Sub- consultants as CONSULTANT deems necessary to assist in the performance or furnishing of professional services hereunder. CONSULTANT shall not require CITY to approve any Sub- consultant reasonably unacceptable to CITY.
    [Show full text]
  • Mdot Fy12 Program Pro
    Table of Contents DBE PROGRAM AUTHORITY........................................................................ 4 FUNDING SOURCES OF THE MDOT DBE PROGRAM ................................................................................. 4 DBE PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................. 5 A. DBE PROGRAM GOALS ................................................................................. 6 METHODOLOGY................................................................................................................................. 7 PROJECTING RACE-NEUTRAL/RACE-CONSCIOUS PORTIONS OF THE GOAL ..................................................... 9 THE CST AND DBE PARTICIPATION GOALS ON MDOT-LET HIGHWAY PROJECTS ......................................... 10 SETTING GOALS ON INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS ............................................................................................ 12 DBE PARTICIPATION DESIGNATIONS ON DESIGN-BUILD PROJECTS ............................................................ 13 COMPOSITION OF THE CONTRACT SELECTION TEAM (CST) ...................................................................... 13 DBE GOAL MONITORING AND REPORTING ........................................................................................... 13 B. MICHIGAN UNIFIED CERTIFICATION PROGRAM (MUCP)(UPDATED) ............ 15 MUCP-CERTIFYING AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................... 16 ANNUAL
    [Show full text]
  • CONSULTANT AUDIT GUIDE 12/01/98 CONSULTANT AUDIT GUIDE TABLE of CONTENTS Preface Page 2
    CONSULTANT AUDIT GUIDE 12/01/98 CONSULTANT AUDIT GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface Page 2 Part I. Introduction Page 4 Part II. Definitions Page 6 Part III. Role of the State External Auditor in Accepting Overhead Audits Performed by Others Page 13 Example of Overhead Audit Report Checklist Page 14 Part IV. Contract Types and Audit Emphasis Page 16 A. Lump Sum (Fixed Price) B. Cost Plus Fixed Fee C. Unit Price (Negotiated Hourly Rate) Part V. Overhead Rate Development and Audit Report Presentation Page 18 A. Audit Standards and Allowable Cost Guidelines B. Contents of the Report Part VI. Consultant Field Offices Page 21 A. General B. Allowable Costs C. Guidelines Sample of Field Office Allocation Page 27 Sample of Overhead Audit Report, Overhead Rate Page 28 Calculation, Notes to Overhead report, Report on Internal Controls, Report on Compliance Acknowledgments Page 37 DCAA – Cost Principle Assessment Attachment 1 12/01/98 CONSULTANT AUDIT GUIDE PREFACE Over the last several years, there has been an increased use of consultant firms contracting with State Department of Transportation (SDOT’s) to perform engineering and other related services. Correspondingly, there has been a workload increase for SDOT auditors providing financial information to management on the consultant firms. Auditors not only provide an audit function for the SDOT’s, but also provide management with financial information on the firm’s ability to perform work. A consultant firm, particularly one that is new to the State/Federal contracting process, may not be aware of the Federal Acquisition Regulations and other financial information necessary to support eligible costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Select Board Town Meeting
    TOWN OF ARLINGTON MASSACHUSETTS REPORT OF THE SELECT BOARD TO THE TOWN MEETING MONDAY APRIL 26, 2021 8:00 P.M. INTRODUCTION The Select Board is pleased to present its report to Town Meeting of its main motions under the following articles. These votes are the result of hearings the Board conducted between February 22nd and April 5th, during which time the Board heard from proponents and opponents of the various articles. The Board has also included its votes of support for two warrant articles (Articles 38 and 43) that will be presented through the main motions of the Arlington Redevelopment Board. The objective of Select Board Warrant Article Hearings is to develop the Board’s recommendations on each article before it by majority vote, to be set forth with the comments in the Select Board Report in advance of Town Meeting. Where the Board supports taking some action contemplated by an article, regardless of how it appears before the Board, the Select Board, with assistance of Town Counsel, shall develop a motion for Town Meeting to take a specific action. Where the Board opposes an article, it will recommend a vote of “no action” to Town Meeting in its report. The Board would like to welcome back John V. Hurd to serve as Arlington’s newly re- elected member of the Board, and Eric D. Helmuth, our newly elected member. The Board thanks Town Meeting members for their service and for their willingness to give fair and serious consideration to all of the important issues raised by the various articles.
    [Show full text]
  • Contract Budget Justification.Xlsx
    TEMPLATE FOR CONTRACT BUDGET JUSTIFICATION PREPARATION Agency Name: Budget Term: Program: All individual line items must show actual amounts. Rounded amounts are carried to the Grant Budget page. INTRODUCTION: Guidance is offered for the preparation of a budget request. Following this guidance will facilitate the review and approval of a requested budget by insuring that the required or needed information is provided. Note: Each Line item category below that has a Superscript 2 must be on the Grant Budget Line-Item Detail page For each requested position, provide the following information: name of staff member occupying the position, if available; monthly salary; percentage of time budgeted for this program; total months of salary budgeted; and total salary requested. Also, provide a justification and describe the scope of responsibility for each position, relating it to the accomplishment of program objectives. Name Position & Title Monthly % of Time # of Months Longevity Amount $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Actual Total for Salaries listed above (amount total) $ - Rounded Total for Salaries listed above (nearest 100) $ - B.Fringe Benefits Fringe benefits are usually applicable to direct salaries and wages. Provide information
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Proposal (Rfp) for Investment Consulting Services
    REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FOR INVESTMENT CONSULTING SERVICES August 1, 2019 Issuing Entity: City of Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund One West Adams Street, Suite 100 Jacksonville, FL 32202-3616 Page 1 of 58 City of Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund Request for Information 1.1 Introduction The City of Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund (“PFPF” or “Fund”) is issuing a Request for Proposal (“RFP”) from investment consulting firms to provide consulting services to PFPF Board of Trustees and Financial Investment Advisory Committee (“FIAC”). This is a non-discretionary, full-retainer mandate. PFPF will retain discretion over all manager/fund selection decisions. Respondents to this RFP are encouraged to describe ways in which they believe their firm’s capabilities are unique and add compelling value. This search is was authorized by the FIAC and seeks to identify potential full-service, general retainer investment consultants. The consultant will report to the Board of Trustees and will also be required to work with and provide assistance to the FIAC. It is anticipated that PFPF will enter into a three to five year contract with the consultant. The Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund (the 'Fund') is a single-employer contributing defined benefit pension plan covering all full-time police officers and firefighters of the Consolidated City of Jacksonville. The Fund was created in 1937 and is structured as an independent agency of the City of Jacksonville. The Fund is administered solely by a five member Board of Trustees. Additional information regarding PFPF can be obtained at http://www.coj.net/departments/police---fire-pension-fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Architect and Engineering Consultant Negotiations and Contracting Recommendations
    Exhibit 1 Architect and Engineering Consultant Negotiations and Contracting Recommendations March 5, 2015 Report No. 15 - 8 Office of the County Auditor Evan A. Lukic, CPA County Auditor Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………….…….………………. 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE …………………………………….…………………………. 2 BACKGROUND …………………………………………………….…………………… 2 RECOMMENDATIONS ………………………………………….……………………… 5 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS …………………………………………….... 10 Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to provide recommendations to the Board to improve the process by which the County negotiates hourly rates with architect and engineering consultants. The basis for the recommendations within this report include, among other things; 1) our observations of negotiations over several years, 2) billing rate reviews of consultants’ contracts with the Aviation Department (BCAD) and several Public Works Department (PW) divisions including: Seaport Engineering and Construction, Highway Construction and Engineering, and Water and Wastewater Engineering, and 3) focus group discussions with County staff, consultants and subconsultants. As discussed more fully in this report, the culmination of our observations, reviews and discussions indicate opportunities to: Reduce administrative burden for County staff, consultants and their subconsultants Reduce the time needed for negotiations Reduce the risk of overpayment by the County Reduce future audit costs of the County, consultants and subconsultants Provide greater consistency in the negotiation process Our recommendations include: 1) Adoption of a Safe Harbor rate option for overhead and fringe benefit costs. 2) Formalizing the County’s general practice of limiting the maximum contract multiplier to 3.0, but permitting exceptions, when justified, on a case by case basis. 3) Adoption by the County of the Florida Department of Transportation model for negotiating consultant operating margins.
    [Show full text]
  • Substantial Revisions Publication 93 (2019) Policy and Procedures for the Administration of Consultant Agreements Chapter 1
    Substantial Revisions Publication 93 (2019) Policy and Procedures for the Administration of Consultant Agreements Chapter 1 - Consultant Requirements Sub Section Title Comment section Chapter 1.1 Introduction No Change Chapter 1.2 1.2.1 Consultant Registration Process ECMS new web address 1.2.2 Municipality Registration Process ECMS new web address Chapter 1.3 Consultant Quality Plan No Change Chapter 1.4 Certificate of Authority to Do Business No Change Chapter 1.5 Engineering Involvement Restrictions No Change 1.5.1 Construction Inspection No Change Chapter 1.6 Conflict of Interest No Change Chapter 1.7 Adverse Interest Act No Change 1 of 7 Chapter 2 – Selection Process Procedures Sub Section Title Comment section Chapter 2.1 2.1.1 Normal Selection Procedures No Change 2.1.2 Modified Selection Procedures No Change Chapter 2.2 Identifying Need for Consultant Services No Change 2.2.1 Right-of-Way Acquisition Services No Change 2.2.2 Photogrammetry Services No Change 2.2.3 Consultant Management Project Manager (CMPM) and Review Gender Neutral Policy Assistance Information 2.2.4 Construction Management Support Service No Change 2.2.5 Consultant Inspection No Change 2.2.6 Highway Construction Design Professional Services Matrix Added per Consultant Procurement Process Mapping BOI meetings to address procurement Chapter 2.3 2.3.1 ECMS Setup No Change 2.3.2 Planned Project No Change 2.3.3 Advertisement No Change 2.3.4 Agreement Clarification Forums No Change Chapter 2.4 Statement of Interest (SOI) No Change 2.4.1 Disqualification of a SOI
    [Show full text]
  • City of San Gabriel STAFF REPORT
    City of San Gabriel STAFF REPORT DATE: June 1, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Lazzaretto, City Manager BY: Domenica Megerdichian, Acting Community Development Director Samantha Tewasart, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement with William Hezmalhalch Architects (WHA) for Architectural, Urban Design, and Historic Preservation Professional Services SUMMARY On January 4, 2021, the City of San Gabriel issued a Request for Proposals (RFP 21-01) for a qualified firm to provide architectural, urban design, and historic preservation professional services. The City received six proposals and William Hezmalhalch Architects (WHA) best met the criteria outlined in the RFP. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement with William Hezmalhalch Architects (WHA) and authorize the City Manager to execute said agreement and issue a purchase order in the amount of $40,000. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS In 2000, the City Council approved the selection of consulting firms to assist the different City departments with specialized city services. A review of the Planning Division’s current contract agreements showed that a Request for Proposals (RFPs) has not been issued for architectural services since 2009. As the City continues to update its agreements for various services, the Planning Division began the process for updating its architectural and preservation services contract. On January 4, 2021, an RFP was issued (Attachment A) seeking qualified consulting firms to assist the City with architectural, urban design, and historical preservation professional services for a three-year period. The RFP was issued to 20 firms and posted on the American Planning Association and American Institute of Architects websites.
    [Show full text]
  • BLM FOA Version 2 8 16
    ] BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Financial Assistance (Cooperative Agreements) ATTACHMENT A PROJECT PROPOSAL (Suggested Format) Instructions: A Project Proposal must be submitted with the Standard Form (SF) 424 Application for Federal Assistance, for all BLM Assistance Agreements. Complete each section below. Use additional sheets as needed. Person Submitting Proposal: Date: Organization Name: NOFO No.: Applicant Project Title (not the NOFO Title): Estimated Period of Performance: Proposed Project Location (include BLM District/Field Office and BLM POC as applicable): If project is to be awarded under a CESU please identify the appropriate CESU: DESIGNATED WATERSHED AREA: Is your project located in a designated watershed area? If yes, define the location If applicable to watershed, describe how your project improves the viability of and other wise benefit the fish, wildlife, and other biotic resources on public land and private land and the reduction of risk from natural disaster where public safety is threatened within the watershed. STATEMENT OF NEED: Describe your mission and objectives, including what the project is expected to achieve. Describe how the objectives of your project meets the BLM’s multiple use mission as well as the DOI priorities described in this announcement. TECHNICAL APPROACH: Detail the development and management plan for your project. Describe the details of the project, the procedures to be used, how data will be collected, analyzed, and interpreted, etc. Describe the techniques, processes, methodologies to be used
    [Show full text]