DOCSLIB.ORG

Leaflet 2005A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Leaflet 2005A LEAF The newsletter of West Coast LEAF VOLUME 18, NUMBER 1 JANUARY 2005 let Both Bertha Wilson and Claire issues in L’Heureux Dube were attacked for being places such reason feminists, activists, and dissenters, much as the Sudan like our two new appointments, particu- and Iraq. In to be larly Rosalie Abella, who have attracted November, A this label even before they had begun. she had the proud Protesters outside the Ottawa court passion and building on October 4, 2004 carried courage to he Supreme Court of Canada has placards denigrating them as radical femi- speak out T two new judges this fall, and they nists with an alleged history of biased against are both women. Four out of nine judgments against men in divorce pro- the Bush judges are now women in the top court ceedings and stressing the importance of Administra- in our land, an extraordinary statistic. We a “No” vote to same-sex marriage. I tion and should be proud that we live in a country haven’t made an exhaustive search of the question Jennifer Conkie that supports and promotes this achieve- archives, but I suspect that this was the the use of ment. When Madam Justices Rosalie first time protesters ever gathered at any unnecessary violence against unarmed Abella and Louise Charron joined Chief Supreme Court appointment, and the civilians in the current Iraq conflict. Justice Beverly McLachlin and Madam media paid attention. Another woman lawyer from our Justice Marie Deschamps in October to province, Senator Mobina Jaffer, is repre- form this remarkable foursome, they senting Canada in international work in made history for our Canadian legal sys- Simply by being present the Sudan, where genocide and systemic tem, and for women generally. rape are occurring. Look at other top courts similar to in the upper echelons of These women have made it to the top ours. In Britain, the House of Lords, decision-making and through their brilliance, determination aptly named, appointed its first woman and commitment. These women will judge just one year ago. In the United law-making, women change the world. Simply by being pres- States, two out of nine justices are do change the world. ent in the upper echelons of decision- women, Ruth Ginsberg and Sandra Day making and law-making, they do change O’Connor. the world. Indeed, where else in the halls of Justice L’Heureux Dube said it best, he truth is, the brilliance and power does one see women present in at her retirement speech, when answer- balance and frontier-breaking almost equal numbers to men? Take a ing the question, is the court being spirit of our Supreme Court is look around you, in the boardrooms and hijacked by feminists. She said, if so, it Tgender neutral. The weightiness of executive ranks of corporate North Amer- started a long time ago, and with male the Court’s decisions, and the wisdom ica, in politics, or in the professions. judges, not the women. She reviewed a therein, come from the consolidation Women are not present and participating line of decisions going back to Chief Jus- of nine great thinkers sharing and co- in anything like equal numbers with men. tice Laskin’s dissent in Murdoch, which creating a body of work. The animus or turned into the majority decision in nly seventy-five years ago, guiding spirit of the Charter assists them, Rathwell five years later, and then men- women couldn’t vote. And just and the values and experiences of each tioned many of Chief Justice Brian Dick- over twenty years ago, the judge informs them. The Court’s deci- O son’s famous Reasons following that. Supreme Court of Canada was still an sions themselves stand or fall, and evolve I return to the pride we should take in exclusive male domain. Since then, we over time, because of the cohesion and the women who have achieved these have had the likes of Judges Bertha the dynamic of the entire group and each lofty heights, though. With Justice Wilson, Claire L’Heureux Dube and continued on page 3 Arbour now the United Nations High Louise Arbour, all retired now from the Commissioner for Human Rights, a This article is based on remarks made at a Supreme Court, offer leadership and powerful position on the world stage, she talk given by Jennifer Conkie at the Lang- vision on key legal issues. advises the UN on critical human rights ley Person’s Day event held in October 2004. NSIDE West Coast LEAF hosts IWest Coast LEAF Consultation on Women’s THE 10TH ANNUAL VICTORIA PER- Equality & Religious Freedom SON'S DAY BREAKFAST held in October was a resounding success attended by over 200 s sexual equality threatened by free- doubt that women throughout the guests. Thanks to all the sponsors, silent auction Idom of religion? On December world are victimized by male-domi- contributors and those who contributed in-kind 2–5, 2004, West Coast LEAF hosted nated religious practices. As partici- services. A special thanks to all the volunteers 40 participants who included women pants from Bountiful and those whose hard work enabled the event to happen, from different communities of faith, representing the Canadian Council of especially the students and faculty at UVic Law community activists, lawyers and Muslim Women and Mouvement School and the staff of Woodward and Compa- scholars in a Consultation on Women Ontarien des Femmes Immigrantes ny law firm. Most of all we thank the guests for and Freedom of Religion. Francophones (MOFIF) stated, coming and hope you enjoyed the event. We The three day event started with women within these communities are greatly appreciate your support and look for- Debbie Palmer, a former member of certainly no exception. Women are ward to seeing you all again next year! the polygamous Mormon community made more vulnerable by religious in Creston B.C. called Bountiful, accommodation laws that have the MANY THANKS TO JILLIAN ROUSSELLE, describing her experiences of abuse effect of placing power in the hands an SFU student who recently completed a four and violence in the of a male elite and month practicum with West Coast LEAF. We community. It that rely on the greatly appreciate the work she did with us and ended on Sunday facile notion that will miss having her in the office on a daily basis. afternoon with a Until recently the women can just Jillian took a moment to share a few words West Coast LEAF leave their commu- about her experience. post-consultation province has nities if they don’t “I came to West Coast LEAF in September roundtable at which refused to enforce like its practices. on a Criminology field placement. My title was members discussed Participants came “Bountiful Consultation Coordinator,” and the an action plan. sexual assault laws, to understand that majority of my duties were focused around the The Consultation the discussion of consultation on Women’s Equality and Reli- focused on the claiming the men Shari’a law’s applica- gious Freedoms, which turned out to be a potential impact of Bountiful may tion in the broader great success. We had participants from across that the accommo- legal system is also Canada take part, and discussed important dation of religious have a religious affected by the post issues such as the polygamous situation in minorities will have 9/11 atmosphere in Bountiful, BC and the implications of Shari’a on women’s equali- freedom defense. Canada, which has law on different groups of Canadian women. ty. Two issues were the effect of isolating Overall, the consultation was very informative focal: the experi- and threatening the and I believe that the information that came ences of women in Bountiful, and the Muslim community. In addition, the out of it will be a useful tool in helping West potential introduction of Shari’a law wide diversity of views passionately Coast LEAF decide what position it should in private arbitration in Ontario. held within Canada’s Muslim com- take on the various issues that were discussed. Both issues proved to be more munity about Shari’a and about cul- “My experience with West Coast LEAF was complex as the discussion progressed tural accommodation more generally positive in many respects. It gave me the through the weekend. On one hand, also influences the discourse. opportunity to work with the amazing staff. It the accommodation of religious free- A different set of confounding allowed me the chance to get involved in many dom is a recognized means by which issues make the situation of Bountiful of the important initiatives of West Coast all people, including women of faith, complex. Though polygamy as it is LEAF. Finally, it helped solidify my decision to are treated with equal respect in practiced in communities like Bounti- go on to law school. In fact, I enjoyed my time Canadian society. So denying reli- ful creates abusive and dangerous sit- at West Coast LEAF so much that despite the gious freedom by curtailing the rights uations for women and children, the fact that my practicum has come to an end, I of women to practice their faith, may polygamy laws in the Criminal Code have decided to continue volunteering with be a form of religious discrimination were written long before the exis- West Coast LEAF on a weekly basis. I believe and may display less than full respect tence of the Charter and there is that the organization is involved in some very for the agency to women of faith. great debate as to their enforceability.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Symposium:Jurocracy and Distrust:Reconsidering The
    User Name: Tyler Cooper Date and Time: Monday, May 20, 2019 6:05:00 PM EDT Job Number: 89258756 Document (1) 1. SYMPOSIUM:JUROCRACY AND DISTRUST:RECONSIDERING THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS PROCESS:JUDICIAL SELECTION AND DEMOCRATIC THEORY: DEMAND, SUPPLY, AND LIFE TENURE, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. 579 Client/Matter: -None- | About LexisNexis | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Copyright © 2019 LexisNexis Tyler Cooper SYMPOSIUM:JUROCRACY AND DISTRUST:RECONSIDERING THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS PROCESS:JUDICIAL SELECTION AND DEMOCRATIC THEORY: DEMAND, SUPPLY, AND LIFE TENURE January, 2005 Reporter 26 Cardozo L. Rev. 579 * Length: 27441 words Author: Judith Resnik* * Arthur Liman Professor of Law, Yale Law School. © Judith Resnik 2005. This article stems from presentations at the Symposium, Jurocracy, at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law in March of 2004 and at the Symposium, Judicial Appointments in a Free and Democratic Society, at the University of Toronto Law School in April of 2004, and builds on my articles "Uncle Sam Modernizes his Justice System": Inventing the District Courts of the Twentieth Century, 90 Geo. L.J. 607 (2002), Trial as Error, Jurisdiction as Injury: Transforming the Meaning of Article III, 113 Harv. L. Rev. 924 (2000), and Changing Criteria for Judging Judges, 84 Nw. U. L. Rev. 889 (1990), as well as on testimony that I submitted to subcommittees of the United States Senate and of the Canadian House of Commons on the topic of judicial nominations. I benefited from comments of other participants, the exchanges at these symposia and hearings, and from discussions with Seyla Benhabib and Deborah Hensler. My thanks to Joseph Blocher, Andrew Goldstein, Paige Herwig, Johanna Kalb, Alison Mackenzie, Jennifer Peresie, Bertrall Ross, Kirby Smith, Laura Smolowe, and Steven Wu for research assistance, to Gene Coakley for all his efforts to locate relevant materials, and to Denny Curtis, Vicki Jackson, Roy Mersky, Roberta Romano, and Albert Yoon for helpful comments on earlier drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • Allocution De La Juge Suzanne Côté : Réception De Bienvenue
    Allocution de la juge Suzanne Côté : Réception de bienvenue The judges of The Supreme Court of Les juges de La Cour suprême du Canada and the University of Ottawa’s Canada et la Faculté de droit de l’Uni- Faculty of Law have always maintained versité d’Ottawa ont toujours entretenu close personal and professional ties. It is d’étroites relations, tant personnelles tradition to hold a welcoming reception que professionnelles. La tradition veut for each newly appointed judge to the que l’on tienne une réception d’accueil Supreme Court of Canada. The Chief Jus- pour chaque juge nouvellement nommé tice and Puisne Judges of the Supreme à la Cour suprême du Canada. La juge Court of Canada, Deans of the Common en chef et les juges puînés de la Cour Law and Civil Law Sections, professors suprême du Canada, les doyennes des and students are invited to attend. In sections respectives de common law keeping with this tradition, the Faculty et de droit civil, le corps professoral et of Law celebrated on March 19th, 2015 the la population étudiante sont conviés à appointment of the Honourable Justice cette réception. Pour perpétuer cette Suzanne Côté. Here are her full remarks tradition, la Faculté de droit a célébré, le at this event. 19 mars 2015, la nomination de l’hono- rable juge Suzanne Côté. Voici la version intégrale de ses remarques lors de cet évènement. 283 Allocution de la juge Suzanne Côté : Réception de bienvenue Madame la Juge en chef, Chers collègues de la Cour suprême, Chers collègues des autres cours et tribunaux, Mesdames les Doyennes des sections de common law et de droit civil, Chers anciens confrères et consœurs du Barreau, Mesdames et Messieurs, C’est aveC beauCoup de plaisir que j’ai reçu l’invitation de Mesdames les Doyennes Des Rosiers1 et Lévesque2 d’assister à cette réception laquelle, me dit-on, s’inscrit dans une tradition maintenant bien ancrée de souhaiter 1 La doyenne Nathalie Des Rosiers a reçu sa licence en droit de l’Université de Montréal et a obtenu sa maitrise en droit de la Harvard Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Series on the Federal Dimensions of Reforming the Supreme Court of Canada
    SPECIAL SERIES ON THE FEDERAL DIMENSIONS OF REFORMING THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA The Supreme Court of Canada: A Chronology of Change Jonathan Aiello Institute of Intergovernmental Relations School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University SC Working Paper 2011 21 May 1869 Intent on there being a final court of appeal in Canada following the Bill for creation of a Supreme country’s inception in 1867, John A. Macdonald, along with Court is withdrawn statesmen Télesphore Fournier, Alexander Mackenzie and Edward Blake propose a bill to establish the Supreme Court of Canada. However, the bill is withdrawn due to staunch support for the existing system under which disappointed litigants could appeal the decisions of Canadian courts to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) sitting in London. 18 March 1870 A second attempt at establishing a final court of appeal is again Second bill for creation of a thwarted by traditionalists and Conservative members of Parliament Supreme Court is withdrawn from Quebec, although this time the bill passed first reading in the House. 8 April 1875 The third attempt is successful, thanks largely to the efforts of the Third bill for creation of a same leaders - John A. Macdonald, Télesphore Fournier, Alexander Supreme Court passes Mackenzie and Edward Blake. Governor General Sir O’Grady Haly gives the Supreme Court Act royal assent on September 17th. 30 September 1875 The Honourable William Johnstone Ritchie, Samuel Henry Strong, The first five puisne justices Jean-Thomas Taschereau, Télesphore Fournier, and William are appointed to the Court Alexander Henry are appointed puisne judges to the Supreme Court of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Carissima Mathen*
    C h o ic es a n d C o n t r o v e r sy : J udic ia l A ppointments in C a n a d a Carissima Mathen* P a r t I What do judges do? As an empirical matter, judges settle disputes. They act as a check on both the executive and legislative branches. They vindicate human rights and civil liberties. They arbitrate jurisdictional conflicts. They disagree. They bicker. They change their minds. In a normative sense, what judges “do” depends very much on one’s views of judging. If one thinks that judging is properly confined to the law’s “four comers”, then judges act as neutral, passive recipients of opinions and arguments about that law.1 They consider arguments, examine text, and render decisions that best honour the law that has been made. If judging also involves analysis of a society’s core (if implicit) political agreements—and the degree to which state laws or actions honour those agreements—then judges are critical players in the mechanisms through which such agreement is tested. In post-war Canada, the judiciary clearly has taken on the second role as well as the first. Year after year, judges are drawn into disputes over the very values of our society, a trend that shows no signs of abating.2 In view of judges’ continuing power, and the lack of political appetite to increase control over them (at least in Canada), it is natural that attention has turned to the process by which persons are nominated and ultimately appointed to the bench.
    [Show full text]
  • For Immediate Release – June 19, 2020 the ADVOCATES' SOCIETY
    For immediate release – June 19, 2020 THE ADVOCATES’ SOCIETY ESTABLISHES THE MODERN ADVOCACY TASK FORCE The Advocates’ Society has established a Modern Advocacy Task Force to make recommendations for the reform of the Canadian justice system. The recommendations of the Task Force will seek to combine the best measures by which Canadian courts have adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic with other measures designed to ensure meaningful and substantive access to justice for the long term. The Advocates’ Society believes that permanent changes to our justice system require careful research, analysis, consultation, and deliberation. “This is a pivotal moment for the Canadian justice system,” said Guy Pratte, incoming President of The Advocates’ Society. “There is no doubt that we are learning a great deal from the changes to the system brought about by necessity during this crisis. We have a unique opportunity to reflect on this experience and use it to enhance the efficiency and quality of the justice system. We must do that while preserving the fundamental right of litigants to have their cases put forward in a meaningful and direct way before courts and other decision-makers.” The Task Force is composed of members of The Advocates’ Society from across the country. They will be guided by an advisory panel of some of the most respected jurists and counsel in our country. The Task Force’s mandate is to provide insight and analysis to assist in the modernization of the justice system. It will be informed by experience, jurisprudence and Canadian societal norms. The Task Force will offer recommendations designed to ensure that the Canadian legal system provides a sustainable, accessible and transparent system of justice in which litigants and the public have confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: a 10-Year Democratic Audit 2014 Canliidocs 33319 Adam M
    The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference Volume 67 (2014) Article 4 Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit 2014 CanLIIDocs 33319 Adam M. Dodek Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Citation Information Dodek, Adam M.. "Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit." The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference 67. (2014). http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr/vol67/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The uS preme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit* Adam M. Dodek** 2014 CanLIIDocs 33319 The way in which Justice Rothstein was appointed marks an historic change in how we appoint judges in this country. It brought unprecedented openness and accountability to the process. The hearings allowed Canadians to get to know Justice Rothstein through their members of Parliament in a way that was not previously possible.1 — The Rt. Hon. Stephen Harper, PC [J]udicial appointments … [are] a critical part of the administration of justice in Canada … This is a legacy issue, and it will live on long after those who have the temporary stewardship of this position are no longer there.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversifying the Bar: Lawyers Make History Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arran
    ■ Diversifying the bar: lawyers make history Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arranged By Year Called to the Bar, Part 2: 1941 to the Present Click here to download Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arranged By Year Called to the Bar, Part 1: 1797 to 1941 For each lawyer, this document offers some or all of the following information: name gender year and place of birth, and year of death where applicable year called to the bar in Ontario (and/or, until 1889, the year admitted to the courts as a solicitor; from 1889, all lawyers admitted to practice were admitted as both barristers and solicitors, and all were called to the bar) whether appointed K.C. or Q.C. name of diverse community or heritage biographical notes name of nominating person or organization if relevant sources used in preparing the biography (note: living lawyers provided or edited and approved their own biographies including the names of their community or heritage) suggestions for further reading, and photo where available. The biographies are ordered chronologically, by year called to the bar, then alphabetically by last name. To reach a particular period, click on the following links: 1941-1950, 1951-1960, 1961-1970, 1971-1980, 1981-1990, 1991-2000, 2001-. To download the biographies of lawyers called to the bar before 1941, please click Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arranged By Year Called to the Bar, Part 2: 1941 to the Present For more information on the project, including the set of biographies arranged by diverse community rather than by year of call, please click here for the Diversifying the Bar: Lawyers Make History home page.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of the Legal Profession Judging Gender
    International Journal of the Legal Profession Judging gender: difference and dissent at the Supreme Court of Canada MARIE-CLAIRE BELLEAU* & REBECCA JOHNSON** ABSTRACT Over 25 years ago, Justice Bertha Wilson asked “Will women judges really make a difference?” Taking up her question, we consider the place of difference in gender and judging. Our focus is on those ‘differences of opinion’ between judges that take the form of written and published judicial dissent. We present and interrogate recent statistics about practices of dissent on the Supreme Court of Canada in relation to gender. The statistics are provocative, but do not provide straightforward answers about gender and judging. They do, however, pose new questions, and suggest the importance of better theorizing and exploring the space of dissent. 1. Introductory observations In a controversial 1990 speech, Justice Bertha Wilson, the first woman judge of the Supreme Court oF Canada, posed a question that has occupied many theorists of law: “Will women judges really make a diFFerence?” (Wilson, 1990). With the beneFit oF 25 years with women judges on Canada’s highest court, it is worth returning to Justice Wilson’s question. But in asking about judges, gender and diFFerence, we want to Foreground a particular kind of diFFerence often present For appellate judges: a ‘diFFerence of opinion’. All judges grapple constantly with the unavoidable tension at the heart oF law—a tension between the demands of stability and responsive change (Fitzpatrick, 2001). But the grappling is intensiFied For appellate judges, who bring multiple skills and divergent liFe experiences to bear on a single case.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Judicial Nomination Processes and the Press: ‘Interesting, in a Sleepy Sort of Way’
    Oñati Socio-legal Series, v. 4, n. 4 (2014) – Law in the Age of Media Logic ISSN: 2079-5971 Canadian Judicial Nomination Processes and the Press: ‘Interesting, in a Sleepy Sort of Way’ ∗ DAVID SCHNEIDERMAN Schneiderman, D., 2014. Canadian Judicial Nomination Processes and the Press: ‘Interesting, in a Sleepy Sort of Way’. Oñati Socio-legal Series [online], 4 (4), 685-708. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2511239 Abstract Most of the recent appointees to the Supreme Court of Canada have participated in a new Canadian judicial nomination process initiated by the current Conservative government. As originally formulated in early policy platforms, the process was intended to mimic features of US Senate judicial confirmation hearings and so would highlight the distinction (popular in US political discourse) between ‘applying’ and ‘making’ law. This led to widespread fears that any new public process would politicize judicial appointments and functions at the Supreme Court. The process turned out to be much more tepid than anticipated and so raises questions about what Canadians may have learned as a consequence of this new nomination process. This paper undertakes a qualitative analysis of reporting of four nomination processes from a select number of Canadian newspapers. The main object is to determine the degree to which readers might have been alerted to the distinction between law and politics or, put another way, between judicial activism and restraint. It turns out that this framing was not dominant in the coverage and that, instead, distinctive Canadian political preoccupations, like language politics, got channeled through this new political opportunity structure.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BULLETIN College Creates Award to Honor Justice O’Connor
    NUMBER 58 WINTer 2008 THE BULLETIN COLLEGE CREATES AWARD to honor JUSTICE O’CONNOR Retired Supreme Court Associate Jus- tice and Honorary Fellow Sandra Day O’Connor was present at the Annual Meeting in Denver to acknowledge and accept the College’s creation of the San- dra Day O’Connor Jurist Award. The College will present this award from time to time to a judge, federal or state, from the United States or Canada who has demonstrated exemplary judi- cial independence in the performance of his or her duties, sometimes in difficult or even dangerous circumstances. The Board of Regents chose to honor O’Connor in this way in recognition of her twenty-four year tenure on the Su- preme Court as its first female member and for her exemplary record of public service. A medal bearing her likeness will be presented to each future O’Connor Jurist recipient. During the ceremony, O’Connor was also presented with a sculptured likeness of her, created by Past President Warren Lightfoot. She has since donated that bust to the Su- Con’t on page 20 This Issue: 64 Pages In This Issue Letter to the Editorial Board I read with interest your article about the vanishing civil trial (Opinion: Before We Jump by E. Os- borne Ayscue, Jr., Summer 2007). I am familiar with issues that you mentioned and I have made several speeches about this over the last several years. It is surprising to me that the trial bar does not seem to be particularly concerned about what is happening. We are beginning to see lawyers with 10-15 years experience that call themselves trial lawyers and do not have a clue what they are doing in a courtroom.
    [Show full text]
  • Does a Judge's Party of Appointment Or
    Osgoode Hall Law Journal Article 3 Volume 45, Number 2 (Summer 2007) Does a Judge's Party of Appointment or Gender Matter to Case outcomes?: An Empirical Study of the Court of Appeal for Ontario James Stribopoulos Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Moin A. Yahya Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Part of the Judges Commons Article Citation Information Stribopoulos, James and Yahya, Moin A.. "Does a Judge's Party of Appointment or Gender Matter to Case outcomes?: An Empirical Study of the Court of Appeal for Ontario." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 45.2 (2007) : 315-363. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol45/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Osgoode Digital Commons. Does a Judge's Party of Appointment or Gender Matter to Case outcomes?: An Empirical Study of the Court of Appeal for Ontario Abstract A recent study by Cass Sunstein identified ideological differences in the votes cast by judges on the United States Courts of Appeals in certain types of cases. He found that these patterns varied depending on the ideology of an appellate judge's co-panelists. In this study, we undertake a similar examination of the busiest appellate court in Canada, the Court of Appeal for Ontario. This study collects data on the votes cast by individual judges in every reported decision between 1990 and 2003. Each case was cod6d by type, for example "criminal law," "constitutional law," or "private law." In addition, the votes cast by individual judges in each category were tracked based on variables such as the type of litigant, the political party that appointed the judge, and the judge's gender.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-2014 Research Report Fringilla Blandit Mi Ac
    2013-2014 Research Report fringilla blandit mi ac Faculty of Law, Common Law Section CommonLaw.uOttawa.ca 2013-2014 Research Report Common Law Section, Faculty of Law University of Ottawa Word from the Vice-Dean Research Looking back at the year 2013-2014 “As Vice-Dean Research, I am very proud of the accomplishments of our individual researchers and of the Common Law Section as a whole in 2013-14. As a result of the hard work of my predecessors in this office and the support from the Dean of the Common Law Section, we have succeeded in creating a culture of research excellence within this Faculty. That research excellence can be seen in the results and the recognition obtained by our researchers in 2013-14 which are documented in this report.” Adam Dodek Goals of the Research Office The role of the Office of the Vice-Dean Research of the Common Law Section of the Faculty of Law is to encourage and support the successful engagement and leadership of Faculty members in research. Research Highlights In 2013-2014, the Common Law Section of the Faculty of Law obtained a total of $2,259,000 in research funding for 80 new or existing research projects. These accomplishments affirm the Office's continued commitment to excellence in research and to providing a strong foundation of support to meet the five research priorities set out by the Vice Dean Research in 2011-2012, namely: Priority 1: To encourage and support Faculty applications for research funding especially federal government Tri-Council funding but also other sources of funding including the Law Foundation of Ontario, the Foundation for Legal Research, private foundations, government and international organizations.
    [Show full text]