DOCSLIB.ORG

THE BULLETIN College Creates Award to Honor Justice O’Connor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE BULLETIN College Creates Award to Honor Justice O’Connor NUMBER 58 WINTer 2008 THE BULLETIN COLLEGE CREATES AWARD to honor JUSTICE O’CONNOR Retired Supreme Court Associate Jus- tice and Honorary Fellow Sandra Day O’Connor was present at the Annual Meeting in Denver to acknowledge and accept the College’s creation of the San- dra Day O’Connor Jurist Award. The College will present this award from time to time to a judge, federal or state, from the United States or Canada who has demonstrated exemplary judi- cial independence in the performance of his or her duties, sometimes in difficult or even dangerous circumstances. The Board of Regents chose to honor O’Connor in this way in recognition of her twenty-four year tenure on the Su- preme Court as its first female member and for her exemplary record of public service. A medal bearing her likeness will be presented to each future O’Connor Jurist recipient. During the ceremony, O’Connor was also presented with a sculptured likeness of her, created by Past President Warren Lightfoot. She has since donated that bust to the Su- Con’t on page 20 This Issue: 64 Pages In This Issue Letter to the Editorial Board I read with interest your article about the vanishing civil trial (Opinion: Before We Jump by E. Os- borne Ayscue, Jr., Summer 2007). I am familiar with issues that you mentioned and I have made several speeches about this over the last several years. It is surprising to me that the trial bar does not seem to be particularly concerned about what is happening. We are beginning to see lawyers with 10-15 years experience that call themselves trial lawyers and do not have a clue what they are doing in a courtroom. You hit on the point that I believe is the core of the problem. Because there are so few experienced trial attorneys, the Bench is beginning to be occupied by judges who have zero experience in the management of a trial/case. These judges simply cannot see the discovery abuses and the excessive motion practice and do not understand that the purpose of the rules of civil procedure is to sim- plify trial preparation. The rules which eliminated ‘fact pleading’ and embraced ‘notice pleading’ will only work under the supervision of a trial judge who understands and manages the pre-trial. I do not know if it is too late to stop the train, but let’s keep trying. Alex W. Newton Birmingham, Alabama IN THIS ISSUE O’Connor Jurist Award Created ...........Cover Upcoming national meetings ..................... 29 Letter to the Editor ..................................... 2 Life cycles and the Beatles’ music ............... 30 From the Editorial Board ............................ 3 Retiring Regents and Chairs ...................... 35 Denver Annual Meeting ............................. 4 Speakers debate global warming ................ 36 Past President Lightfoot: Sculptor ............... 7 Justice Charron made Honorary Fellow ..... 40 O’Connor: Judges Must Be Independent .... 8 In Memoriam ........................................... 44 Robinson made Honorary Fellow .............. 11 Student competition winners honored ....... 50 College elects new Officers and Regents..... 12 Your College website listing ....................... 51 Robinson: The Rule of Law and Terrorism . 13 Meet your new Regents ............................. 52 College inducts 94 ..................................... 18 Gumpert Award aids refugee and Profile: John G. Corlew ............................. 22 immigrant children ....................................54 Diamond on Jurors .................................... 24 Awards, Honors and Elections .................. 57 Phyllis Cooper: Last charter member dies .. 29 Chief Judge extols legal exchanges .............. 58 A current calendar of College events is posted on the College website at www.actl.com, as are a current compendium of the ongoing projects of the College’s National Committees. 2 w THE BULLETIN American College of Trial Lawyers F R O M T H E The Bulletin E DITORIAL BOARD Chancellor-Founder In this issue we feature the College’s annual meeting Hon. Emil Gumpert (1895-1982) in Denver. As usual, the speakers provided those in attendance with much to think about, and we Officers have attempted to make available to all the Fellows Mikel L. Stout, President John J. (Jack) Dalton, President-Elect who could not be there the substance of all the Gregory P. Joseph, Secretary presentations. Joan A. Lukey, Treasurer David J. Beck, Immediate Past President In keeping with our past practice, we have therefore Board of Regents quoted liberally from all the presentations and have David J. Beck Christy D. Jones Houston, Texas Jackson, Mississippi reprinted virtually verbatim two, those of Justice Paul D. Bekman Gregory P. Joseph Sandra Day O’Connor and new Honorary Fellow Baltimore, Maryland New York, New York Mary Robinson. J. Donald Cowan, Jr. Philip J. Kessler Greensboro, North Carolina Detroit, Michigan John J. (Jack) Dalton Joan A. Lukey At the workshops last Fall, the state and province Atlanta, Georgia Boston, Massachusetts chairs were asked to appoint correspondents who Michel Decary, Q.C. Paul S. Meyer Montreal, Canada Costa Mesa, California could report their activities to us for possible publi- Francis X. Dee John S. Siffert cation. We have heard from one State Committee Newark, New Jersey New York, New York that has appointed someone to do so. That leaves Bruce W. Felmly Mikel L. Stout Manchester, New Hampshire Wichita, Kansas only sixty states and provinces to go! Paul T. Fortino Robert W. Tarun Portland, Oregon Chicago, Illinois Recently, we solicited writers for the Bulletin. Since Phillip R. Garrison John H. Tucker Springfield, Missouri Tulsa, Oklahoma then, we have found a volunteer who will take over Robert A. Goodin Chilton Davis Varner writing one of our most well-received features, the San Francisco, California Atlanta, Georgia obituaries of deceased Fellows, in the next issue. Editorial Board E. Osborne Ayscue, Jr., Charlotte, North Carolina, Chair Susan S. Brewer, Morgantown, West Virginia, Vice Chair Some of you have asked how we go about putting James J. Brosnahan, San Francisco, California Andrew M. Coats, Norman, Oklahoma the rest of the Bulletin together. First, we look for Michael A. Cooper, New York, New York possible subjects for feature articles, which Editor Patricia D. S. (Trisha) Jackson, Toronto, Ontario Timothy D. Kelly, Minneapolis, Minnesota Marion Ellis then writes. Marion was a co-author Hon. Garr M. King, Portland, Oregon Warren B. Lightfoot, Birmingham, Alabama of Sages of Their Craft, the fifty-year history of the Simon V. Potter, Montreal, Quebec Conrad M. Shumadine, Norfolk, Virginia College published in 2000. He knows the College Michael A. Williams, Denver, Colorado G. Gray Wilson, Winston-Salem, North Carolina well. Many of you have met him at College meet- (J. Donald Cowan, Jr., Greensboro, North Carolina, Regent Liaison) ings and indeed many of our story ideas came from Marion A. Ellis, Editor conversations he had with some of you. Telephone: 704.366.6599 Emails: [email protected], [email protected] Liz Doten, Art Direction and Design The articles reporting most of the presentations at Email: [email protected] our national meetings that involve legal subjects American College of Trial Lawyers need of necessity to be written by lawyers. We do Dennis J. Maggi, CAE Executive Director 19900 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 610, Irvine, California 92612 not want to misquote or misinterpret speakers of the Telephone: 949.752.1801 Facsimile: 949.752.1674 Email: [email protected] Website: www.actl.com caliber of those who address us at those meetings. COPYRIGHT © 2008 Con’t on page 6 THE BULLETIN w 3 COLLEGE GATHERS IN MILE HIGH CITYfor 57TH ANNUAL MEETING Fellows and guests gathered in Denver, Colorado on Thursday, October 11, 2007 for the 57th Annual Meeting of the College. The Hyatt Regency Denver was the scene of the meeting. The spectacular Denver Art Museum was the locale for the President’s welcoming reception on Thursday night. Featuring the year-old Frederic C. Hamilton Building, an addition designed by famed architect Daniel Libeskind to reflect the Rocky Mountains, the museum was a perfect setting for the event. Friday’s program began with a welcome from Denver Mayor John W. Hickenlooper. Lavinia Limón, President and Chief Executive Officer of the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, accepted the Gumpert Award on behalf of her orga- nization’s subsidiary, the National Center for Refugee Fellows and guests arrive at Denver and Immigrant Children. Limón’s presentation was Art Museum an eye-opening look into the plight of a group of chil- dren that has remained largely out of the public eye. Her address, like many of the others from the meeting program, is summarized elsewhere in this issue. In an address entitled “The American College and the Judiciary: A Valuable Exchange,” Tenth Circuit Chief Judge Deanelle Reece Tacha, a three-time delegate to College-sponsored Anglo-American and Canada- 4 w THE BULLETIN United States Exchanges, and their guests to display Saturday’s program ended praised the College for spon- the athletic jerseys of their with a debate between soring these exchanges. own or their favorite teams David D. Doniger, Policy at a party at INVESCO Director of the Natural Re- In the course of the meeting, Field, home of the Denver source Defense Council, and the winners of the Canadian Broncos. Regent Raymond Fredrick D. Palmer, senior and United States Moot Court Brown was resplendent in a vice president of Peabody and Trial Competitions and Colts jersey, bearing his old Energy, the world’s largest the best oral advocates from number, generating a debate privately-owned coal com- each were recognized by the about whether the obviously pany. Their subject: “Global College. new jersey was necessitated Warming: The Energy and by the age or by the size of the Environment.” The highlight of the meet- the original model. ing was the creation of the The annual business meeting Sandra Day O’Connor Jurist Saturday’s program began of the Fellows and the reor- Award, the presentation of with the presentation by past ganizational meeting of the a bust of Justice O’Connor president David W.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Symposium:Jurocracy and Distrust:Reconsidering The
    User Name: Tyler Cooper Date and Time: Monday, May 20, 2019 6:05:00 PM EDT Job Number: 89258756 Document (1) 1. SYMPOSIUM:JUROCRACY AND DISTRUST:RECONSIDERING THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS PROCESS:JUDICIAL SELECTION AND DEMOCRATIC THEORY: DEMAND, SUPPLY, AND LIFE TENURE, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. 579 Client/Matter: -None- | About LexisNexis | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Copyright © 2019 LexisNexis Tyler Cooper SYMPOSIUM:JUROCRACY AND DISTRUST:RECONSIDERING THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS PROCESS:JUDICIAL SELECTION AND DEMOCRATIC THEORY: DEMAND, SUPPLY, AND LIFE TENURE January, 2005 Reporter 26 Cardozo L. Rev. 579 * Length: 27441 words Author: Judith Resnik* * Arthur Liman Professor of Law, Yale Law School. © Judith Resnik 2005. This article stems from presentations at the Symposium, Jurocracy, at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law in March of 2004 and at the Symposium, Judicial Appointments in a Free and Democratic Society, at the University of Toronto Law School in April of 2004, and builds on my articles "Uncle Sam Modernizes his Justice System": Inventing the District Courts of the Twentieth Century, 90 Geo. L.J. 607 (2002), Trial as Error, Jurisdiction as Injury: Transforming the Meaning of Article III, 113 Harv. L. Rev. 924 (2000), and Changing Criteria for Judging Judges, 84 Nw. U. L. Rev. 889 (1990), as well as on testimony that I submitted to subcommittees of the United States Senate and of the Canadian House of Commons on the topic of judicial nominations. I benefited from comments of other participants, the exchanges at these symposia and hearings, and from discussions with Seyla Benhabib and Deborah Hensler. My thanks to Joseph Blocher, Andrew Goldstein, Paige Herwig, Johanna Kalb, Alison Mackenzie, Jennifer Peresie, Bertrall Ross, Kirby Smith, Laura Smolowe, and Steven Wu for research assistance, to Gene Coakley for all his efforts to locate relevant materials, and to Denny Curtis, Vicki Jackson, Roy Mersky, Roberta Romano, and Albert Yoon for helpful comments on earlier drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • Allocution De La Juge Suzanne Côté : Réception De Bienvenue
    Allocution de la juge Suzanne Côté : Réception de bienvenue The judges of The Supreme Court of Les juges de La Cour suprême du Canada and the University of Ottawa’s Canada et la Faculté de droit de l’Uni- Faculty of Law have always maintained versité d’Ottawa ont toujours entretenu close personal and professional ties. It is d’étroites relations, tant personnelles tradition to hold a welcoming reception que professionnelles. La tradition veut for each newly appointed judge to the que l’on tienne une réception d’accueil Supreme Court of Canada. The Chief Jus- pour chaque juge nouvellement nommé tice and Puisne Judges of the Supreme à la Cour suprême du Canada. La juge Court of Canada, Deans of the Common en chef et les juges puînés de la Cour Law and Civil Law Sections, professors suprême du Canada, les doyennes des and students are invited to attend. In sections respectives de common law keeping with this tradition, the Faculty et de droit civil, le corps professoral et of Law celebrated on March 19th, 2015 the la population étudiante sont conviés à appointment of the Honourable Justice cette réception. Pour perpétuer cette Suzanne Côté. Here are her full remarks tradition, la Faculté de droit a célébré, le at this event. 19 mars 2015, la nomination de l’hono- rable juge Suzanne Côté. Voici la version intégrale de ses remarques lors de cet évènement. 283 Allocution de la juge Suzanne Côté : Réception de bienvenue Madame la Juge en chef, Chers collègues de la Cour suprême, Chers collègues des autres cours et tribunaux, Mesdames les Doyennes des sections de common law et de droit civil, Chers anciens confrères et consœurs du Barreau, Mesdames et Messieurs, C’est aveC beauCoup de plaisir que j’ai reçu l’invitation de Mesdames les Doyennes Des Rosiers1 et Lévesque2 d’assister à cette réception laquelle, me dit-on, s’inscrit dans une tradition maintenant bien ancrée de souhaiter 1 La doyenne Nathalie Des Rosiers a reçu sa licence en droit de l’Université de Montréal et a obtenu sa maitrise en droit de la Harvard Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Series on the Federal Dimensions of Reforming the Supreme Court of Canada
    SPECIAL SERIES ON THE FEDERAL DIMENSIONS OF REFORMING THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA The Supreme Court of Canada: A Chronology of Change Jonathan Aiello Institute of Intergovernmental Relations School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University SC Working Paper 2011 21 May 1869 Intent on there being a final court of appeal in Canada following the Bill for creation of a Supreme country’s inception in 1867, John A. Macdonald, along with Court is withdrawn statesmen Télesphore Fournier, Alexander Mackenzie and Edward Blake propose a bill to establish the Supreme Court of Canada. However, the bill is withdrawn due to staunch support for the existing system under which disappointed litigants could appeal the decisions of Canadian courts to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) sitting in London. 18 March 1870 A second attempt at establishing a final court of appeal is again Second bill for creation of a thwarted by traditionalists and Conservative members of Parliament Supreme Court is withdrawn from Quebec, although this time the bill passed first reading in the House. 8 April 1875 The third attempt is successful, thanks largely to the efforts of the Third bill for creation of a same leaders - John A. Macdonald, Télesphore Fournier, Alexander Supreme Court passes Mackenzie and Edward Blake. Governor General Sir O’Grady Haly gives the Supreme Court Act royal assent on September 17th. 30 September 1875 The Honourable William Johnstone Ritchie, Samuel Henry Strong, The first five puisne justices Jean-Thomas Taschereau, Télesphore Fournier, and William are appointed to the Court Alexander Henry are appointed puisne judges to the Supreme Court of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    HOT SPRINGS CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU 134 Convention Boulevard • Hot Springs National Park, Arkansas 71901 1-800-922-6478 • 501-321-2027 • FAX 501-620-5008 www.hotsprings.org ________________________________________________________________________ NEWS RELEASE March 2, 2011 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Paul Johnson 501/225-5937 [email protected] New Details Discovered About Irish-immigrant War Hero Who Will Be Honored in Hot Springs Ceremony March 14 HOT SPRINGS NATIONAL PARK, Arkansas — New details have been discovered about the life of Irish immigrant John King, one of only 19 people who have received two Congressional Medals of Honor and who will be honored March 14 with a ceremony at his Hot Springs gravesite. Governor Mike Beebe and Irish Consul General Martin Rouine have been invited to attend the ceremony in Calvary Cemetery at 2 p.m. March 14. King was buried there after he died in May 1938 while being treated for pneumonia at the Army & Navy General Hospital. The March 14 ceremony is being coordinated by the Hot Springs Convention and Visitors Bureau with the assistance of the Thadeus H. Caraway Post 2278 of the Veterans of Foreign Wars and Post Commander Ralph Faresc. The VFW is coordinating the military portion of the event and several other local groups have asked to be involved with the ceremony. Calvary Cemetery, the local Catholic cemetery is located at the intersection of Greenwood Avenue and Third Street. The shortest route is to take Central Avenue to Greenwood and turn west. Details about King’s life and the circumstances surrounding his two Medals of Honor were extremely sketchy until Elizabeth Robbins, executive director of the Garland County Historical Society, began an intensive search for more information.
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide Facts Oladeinde Is a Staff Writerall for Hands Suicide Is on the Rise Nationwide
    A L p AN Stephen Murphy (left),of Boston, AMSAN Kevin Sitterson (center), of Roper, N.C., and AN Rick Martell,of Bronx, N.Y., await the launch of an F-14 Tomcat on the flight deckof USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71). e 4 24 e 6 e e Hidden secrets Operation Deliberate Force e e The holidays are a time for giving. USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71) e e proves what it is made of during one of e e Make time for your shipmates- it e e could be the gift of life. the biggest military operations in Europe e e since World War 11. e e e e 6 e e 28 e e Grab those Gifts e e Merchants say thanks to those in This duty’s notso tough e e uniform. Your ID card is worth more Nine-section duty is off to a great start e e e e than you may think. and gets rave reviews aboardUSS e e Anchorage (LSD 36). e e PAGE 17 e e 10 e e The right combination 30 e e e e Norfolk hospital corpsman does studio Sailors care,do their fair share e e time at night. Seabees from CBU420 build a Habitat e e e e for Humanity house in Jacksonville, Fla. e e 12 e e e e Rhyme tyme 36 e e Nautical rhymes bring the past to Smart ideas start here e e e e everyday life. See how many you Sailors learn the ropes and get off to a e e remember.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: a 10-Year Democratic Audit 2014 Canliidocs 33319 Adam M
    The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference Volume 67 (2014) Article 4 Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit 2014 CanLIIDocs 33319 Adam M. Dodek Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Citation Information Dodek, Adam M.. "Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit." The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference 67. (2014). http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr/vol67/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The uS preme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit* Adam M. Dodek** 2014 CanLIIDocs 33319 The way in which Justice Rothstein was appointed marks an historic change in how we appoint judges in this country. It brought unprecedented openness and accountability to the process. The hearings allowed Canadians to get to know Justice Rothstein through their members of Parliament in a way that was not previously possible.1 — The Rt. Hon. Stephen Harper, PC [J]udicial appointments … [are] a critical part of the administration of justice in Canada … This is a legacy issue, and it will live on long after those who have the temporary stewardship of this position are no longer there.
    [Show full text]
  • American Naval Policy, Strategy, Plans and Operations in the Second Decade of the Twenty- First Century Peter M
    American Naval Policy, Strategy, Plans and Operations in the Second Decade of the Twenty- first Century Peter M. Swartz January 2017 Select a caveat DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited. CNA’s Occasional Paper series is published by CNA, but the opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of CNA or the Department of the Navy. Distribution DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited. PUBLIC RELEASE. 1/31/2017 Other requests for this document shall be referred to CNA Document Center at [email protected]. Photography Credit: A SM-6 Dual I fired from USS John Paul Jones (DDG 53) during a Dec. 14, 2016 MDA BMD test. MDA Photo. Approved by: January 2017 Eric V. Thompson, Director Center for Strategic Studies This work was performed under Federal Government Contract No. N00014-16-D-5003. Copyright © 2017 CNA Abstract This paper provides a brief overview of U.S. Navy policy, strategy, plans and operations. It discusses some basic fundamentals and the Navy’s three major operational activities: peacetime engagement, crisis response, and wartime combat. It concludes with a general discussion of U.S. naval forces. It was originally written as a contribution to an international conference on maritime strategy and security, and originally published as a chapter in a Routledge handbook in 2015. The author is a longtime contributor to, advisor on, and observer of US Navy strategy and policy, and the paper represents his personal but well-informed views. The paper was written while the Navy (and Marine Corps and Coast Guard) were revising their tri- service strategy document A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower, finally signed and published in March 2015, and includes suggestions made by the author to the drafters during that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversifying the Bar: Lawyers Make History Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arran
    ■ Diversifying the bar: lawyers make history Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arranged By Year Called to the Bar, Part 2: 1941 to the Present Click here to download Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arranged By Year Called to the Bar, Part 1: 1797 to 1941 For each lawyer, this document offers some or all of the following information: name gender year and place of birth, and year of death where applicable year called to the bar in Ontario (and/or, until 1889, the year admitted to the courts as a solicitor; from 1889, all lawyers admitted to practice were admitted as both barristers and solicitors, and all were called to the bar) whether appointed K.C. or Q.C. name of diverse community or heritage biographical notes name of nominating person or organization if relevant sources used in preparing the biography (note: living lawyers provided or edited and approved their own biographies including the names of their community or heritage) suggestions for further reading, and photo where available. The biographies are ordered chronologically, by year called to the bar, then alphabetically by last name. To reach a particular period, click on the following links: 1941-1950, 1951-1960, 1961-1970, 1971-1980, 1981-1990, 1991-2000, 2001-. To download the biographies of lawyers called to the bar before 1941, please click Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arranged By Year Called to the Bar, Part 2: 1941 to the Present For more information on the project, including the set of biographies arranged by diverse community rather than by year of call, please click here for the Diversifying the Bar: Lawyers Make History home page.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of the Legal Profession Judging Gender
    International Journal of the Legal Profession Judging gender: difference and dissent at the Supreme Court of Canada MARIE-CLAIRE BELLEAU* & REBECCA JOHNSON** ABSTRACT Over 25 years ago, Justice Bertha Wilson asked “Will women judges really make a difference?” Taking up her question, we consider the place of difference in gender and judging. Our focus is on those ‘differences of opinion’ between judges that take the form of written and published judicial dissent. We present and interrogate recent statistics about practices of dissent on the Supreme Court of Canada in relation to gender. The statistics are provocative, but do not provide straightforward answers about gender and judging. They do, however, pose new questions, and suggest the importance of better theorizing and exploring the space of dissent. 1. Introductory observations In a controversial 1990 speech, Justice Bertha Wilson, the first woman judge of the Supreme Court oF Canada, posed a question that has occupied many theorists of law: “Will women judges really make a diFFerence?” (Wilson, 1990). With the beneFit oF 25 years with women judges on Canada’s highest court, it is worth returning to Justice Wilson’s question. But in asking about judges, gender and diFFerence, we want to Foreground a particular kind of diFFerence often present For appellate judges: a ‘diFFerence of opinion’. All judges grapple constantly with the unavoidable tension at the heart oF law—a tension between the demands of stability and responsive change (Fitzpatrick, 2001). But the grappling is intensiFied For appellate judges, who bring multiple skills and divergent liFe experiences to bear on a single case.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Judicial Nomination Processes and the Press: ‘Interesting, in a Sleepy Sort of Way’
    Oñati Socio-legal Series, v. 4, n. 4 (2014) – Law in the Age of Media Logic ISSN: 2079-5971 Canadian Judicial Nomination Processes and the Press: ‘Interesting, in a Sleepy Sort of Way’ ∗ DAVID SCHNEIDERMAN Schneiderman, D., 2014. Canadian Judicial Nomination Processes and the Press: ‘Interesting, in a Sleepy Sort of Way’. Oñati Socio-legal Series [online], 4 (4), 685-708. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2511239 Abstract Most of the recent appointees to the Supreme Court of Canada have participated in a new Canadian judicial nomination process initiated by the current Conservative government. As originally formulated in early policy platforms, the process was intended to mimic features of US Senate judicial confirmation hearings and so would highlight the distinction (popular in US political discourse) between ‘applying’ and ‘making’ law. This led to widespread fears that any new public process would politicize judicial appointments and functions at the Supreme Court. The process turned out to be much more tepid than anticipated and so raises questions about what Canadians may have learned as a consequence of this new nomination process. This paper undertakes a qualitative analysis of reporting of four nomination processes from a select number of Canadian newspapers. The main object is to determine the degree to which readers might have been alerted to the distinction between law and politics or, put another way, between judicial activism and restraint. It turns out that this framing was not dominant in the coverage and that, instead, distinctive Canadian political preoccupations, like language politics, got channeled through this new political opportunity structure.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHICAL DATA BOO KK Class 2020-2 27
    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Class 2020-2 27 Jan - 28 Feb 2020 National Defense University NDU PRESIDENT Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge, USN 16th President Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge is an honors graduate of the University of Minnesota with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering and was commissioned through the Reserve Officers' Training Corps program. He earned a Master of Science in Engineering Management from the Catholic University of America and a Master of Arts with highest distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies from the Naval War College. He was a fellow of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Seminar XXI program. VADM Fritz Roegge, NDU President (Photo His sea tours include USS Whale (SSN 638), USS by NDU AV) Florida (SSBN 728) (Blue), USS Key West (SSN 722) and command of USS Connecticut (SSN 22). His major command tour was as commodore of Submarine Squadron 22 with additional duty as commanding officer, Naval Support Activity La Maddalena, Italy. Ashore, he has served on the staffs of both the Atlantic and the Pacific Submarine Force commanders, on the staff of the director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion, on the Navy staff in the Assessments Division (N81) and the Military Personnel Plans and Policy Division (N13), in the Secretary of the Navy's Office of Legislative Affairs at the U. S, House of Representatives, as the head of the Submarine and Nuclear Power Distribution Division (PERS 42) at the Navy Personnel Command, and as an assistant deputy director on the Joint Staff in both the Strategy and Policy (J5) and the Regional Operations (J33) Directorates.
    [Show full text]
  • Exam Rate Name Command Short Title ABE1 AMETO YAOVI AZO
    Exam Rate Name Command Short Title ABE1 AMETO YAOVI AZO USS JOHN C STENNIS ABE1 FATTY MUTARR TRANSITPERSU PUGET SOUND WA ABE1 GONZALES BRIAN USS NIMITZ ABE1 GRANTHAM MASON USS DWIGHT D EISENHOWER ABE1 HO TRAN HUYNH B TRANSITPERSU PUGET SOUND WA ABE1 IVIE CASEY TERR NAS JACKSONVILLE FL ABE1 LAXAMANA KAMYLL USS GERALD R FORD CVN-78 ABE1 MORENO ALBERTO NAVCRUITDIST CHICAGO IL ABE1 ONEAL CHAMONE C PERSUPP DET NORTH ISLAND CA ABE1 PINTORE JOHN MA USS GEORGE H W BUSH ABE1 RIVERA MARIANI USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT ABE1 ROMERO ESPERANZ NOSC SAN DIEGO CA ABE1 SANMIGUEL MICHA USS GEORGE H W BUSH ABE1 SANTOS ANGELA V USS CARL VINSON ABE2 ANTOINE BRODRIC PERSUPPDET KEY WEST FL ABE2 AUSTIN ARMANI V USS RONALD REAGAN ABE2 AYOUB FADI ZEYA USS CARL VINSON ABE2 BAKER KATHLEEN USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN ABE2 BARNABE ALEXAND USS RONALD REAGAN ABE2 BEATON TOWAANA USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN ABE2 BEDOYA NICOLE USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT ABE2 BIRDPEREZ ZULYR HELICOPTER MINE COUNT SQ 12 VA ABE2 BLANCO FERNANDO USS GEORGE WASHINGTON ABE2 BRAMWELL ALEXAR USS HARRY S TRUMAN ABE2 CARBY TAVOY KAM PERSUPPDET KEY WEST FL ABE2 CARRANZA KEKOAK USS GEORGE WASHINGTON ABE2 CASTRO BENJAMIN USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT ABE2 CIPRIANO IRICE USS NIMITZ ABE2 CONNER MATTHEW USS JOHN C STENNIS ABE2 DOVE JESSICA PA USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT ABE2 DREXLER WILLIAM PERSUPP DET CHINA LAKE CA ABE2 DUDREY SARAH JO USS GEORGE H W BUSH ABE2 FERNANDEZ ROBER USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT ABE2 GAL DANIEL USS GEORGE H W BUSH ABE2 GARCIA ALEXANDE NAS LEMOORE CA ABE2 GREENE DONOVAN USS RONALD REAGAN ABE2 HALL CASSIDY RA USS THEODORE
    [Show full text]