DOCSLIB.ORG

Empirical Factors and Structure Transference Returning to The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Empirical Factors and Structure Transference Returning to The Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (2012) 95–104 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/shpsb Empirical factors and structure transference: Returning to the London account Ota´vio Bueno a,n, Steven French b, James Ladyman c a Department of Philosophy, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA b Department of Philosophy, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK c Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TB, UK article info abstract Article history: We offer a framework to represent the roles of empirical and theoretical factors in theory construction, Received 16 September 2010 and examine a case study to illustrate how the framework can be used to illuminate central features of Received in revised form scientific reasoning. The case study provides an extension of French and Ladyman’s (1997) analysis of 13 January 2012 Fritz and Heinz London’s model of superconductivity to accommodate the role of the analogy between Accepted 8 February 2012 superconductivity and diamagnetic phenomena in the development of the model between 1935 and 1937. We focus on this case since it allows us to separate the roles of empirical and theoretical factors, Keywords: and so provides an example of the utility of the approach that we have adopted. We conclude the paper Theory construction by drawing on the particular framework here developed to address a range of concerns. Models & 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Semantic approach Partial structures Superconductivity London and London model When citing this paper, please use the full journal title Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 1. Introduction partial structures version of the semantic approach. Second, we explore a particular case study using this framework. The episode It is a commonplace to say that theory construction involves in question admits of a separation of the respective roles of the both empirical and theoretical constraints. How these constraints empirical and theoretical factors, and thus provides an example of interact, however, is a much more contested matter. Empirical the utility of the approach that we have adopted. considerations often limit the scope of possibilities for theoretical The case study extends French and Ladyman’s analysis of Fritz elaboration, while the latter typically suggest avenues for further and Heinz London’s model of superconductivity to cover the role research, particularly since they are usually associated with of the crucial diamagnetic analogy in the development of the heuristic principles. In many cases, it is very difficult to map out model between 1935 and 1937 (French and Ladyman, 1997). This the contributions of each of these types of consideration. We are feature of the episode has not, to our knowledge, been studied interested in particular in the way such experimental results can previously and here we see an interesting shift from a ‘macro- help drive the move to a new model of the phenomena. As we scopic’ model, dealing with current densities and magnetic fields shall see, the move may be more complex than is generally strengths, to a microscopic interpretation, based on the motion of appreciated and, indeed, we shall suggest that it can be concep- electrons, that, although not able to offer a full theoretical tually divided into two distinct stages, which we will call, explanation of superconductivity (for reasons that shall become respectively, the characterization and explanatory stages. clear), greatly reduced the range of options available. What is Our goal in this paper is thus twofold: First, we present a particularly interesting are the roles of, first, a crucially important formal account of these stages within the framework of the experiment (associated with what came to be known as the Meissner effect), and, second, a fundamental analogy with the theory of diamagnetism. The construction of the London and n London model was crucially dependent on this experimental Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (O. Bueno), result, which was effectively ‘built into’ the model. However, this [email protected] (S. French), [email protected] (J. Ladyman). move does not render the model ad hoc, since the intention was 1355-2198/$ - see front matter & 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2012.02.003 96 O. Bueno et al. / Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (2012) 95–104 not to explain the relevant phenomenon behind this result, but to shall be considering here—that take us from the phenomena to characterize it in a way that allows the resources of the theory of the theoretical level (Bueno, 1997): electomagnetism to be brought to bear. The manner of character- Sk ¼ /Dk,Rk1,Rk2,Rk3,...,RknS ization was determined, in part, by the analogy with diamag- SkÀ1 ¼ /DkÀ1,RðkÀ1Þ1,RðkÀ1Þ2,RðkÀ1Þ3,...,RðkÀ1ÞnS netism, that was increasingly drawn upon to construct the ... underlying ‘microscopic’ model which was presented as a partial S ¼ /D ,R ,R ,R ,...,R S explanation. 3 3 31 32 33 3n / S Thus, what we have here, as we shall see, is not simply a case S2 ¼ D2,R21,R22,R23,...,R2n / S of filling in the value of a quantity which in the construction of S1 ¼ D1,R11,R12,R13,...,R1n the theory had been left open. Instead, the experimental result 1 2 3 where each Rij is a partial relation of the form /Rij, Rij, RijS—with ruled out the older model and motivated the construction of a 1 2 Rij representing the n-tuples that (we know) belong to Rij, Rij, the new one. As will become clear, in the context of our case study, 3 ones that (we know) do not belong to Rij, and Rij, those for which the two stages of characterization and explanation correspond to it is not defined whether they belong or not—such that, for every the schema adopted by one of the principal protagonists, Fritz 3 3 i,1rirk, card(Rij)4card(R(iþ1)j)(Bueno 1997, p. 601). The London, in his own reflective view of theory construction. It is partial relations are extended as one goes up the hierarchy, in perhaps unusual to find theory construction separated so expli- the sense that at each level, partial relations which were not citly into stages in this manner, but it very nicely sheds light on defined at a lower level come to be defined, with their elements the role of empirical factors in theory construction. belonging to either R1 or R2. However, we shall also examine the fundamental role of the Now, empirical results can be accommodated within this theoretical analogy with diamagnetism and the way in which hierarchy in various ways and as we indicated above, we wish further structure was imported into the superconducting domain to focus on the way such results can help drive the move to a new in order to frame the developing microscopic model. Such a model of the phenomena. Such a move can be represented within transfer of structure can also be nicely accommodated within our formalism as follows: the partial structures account of theories (see, for example, ¼ / S - 0 ¼ / 0 S da Costa and French, 2003) which represents the relationships A D,Rk k A K A D,Rk k A K between such theories in terms of partial isomorphisms and where, as we shall see, some of the theoretical relations used to homomorphisms. help obtain A may be retained by A0. In constructing the new model, various heuristic principles may be drawn upon but, again, we shall be particularly interested in the transfer of structure, that is, where structure in one domain is drawn upon to help 2. The characterization-explanation framework determine the relevant structure in another. In transferring such structure, analogies may often play a heuristic role, as will The formal details underpinning our framework have been become clear below. Here one may represent the situation with given elsewhere (see, e.g., da Costa and French, 2003), but we two different models—differing in their respective domains, shall summarize them before considering how this framework D and D0—and which can be related via partial isomorphisms can accommodate the above two-stage process: A partial struc- (or other morphisms): ture is a set-theoretic construct A¼/D, RiSiAI, where D is a non- / S 0 / 0 0 S empty set and each Ri is a partial relation. A partial relation Ri over A ¼ D,Rk k A K and A ¼ D ,Rk k A K D is a relation which is not necessarily defined for all n-tuples of In this case, the ontology of the models is different, and what elements of D (see da Costa and French, 1990, p. 255). Each partial matters is the way in which the relations from one model are / S relation R can be viewed as an ordered triple R1, R2, R3 , where mapped into the other. n R1, R2, and R3 are mutually disjoint sets, with R1[R2[R3¼D , and These two factors—the empirical and the transfer of such that: R1 is the set of n-tuples that (we take to) belong to R; R2 structure—may then work together to contribute to what we call is the set of n-tuples that (we take) do not belong to R, and R3 is the characterization stage, where a determinate characterization of the set of n-tuples for which it is not defined whether they belong the relevant phenomenon is constructed. What is involved in such or not to R. a characterization is the stabilization of a given phenomena such / S 0 / 0 If we have two partial structures, A¼ D, Rk kAK and A ¼ D , that it is amenable to further theoretical development.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rostislaw Kaischew and His Trace in the Fundamental Science. a Brief Historical Overview of the Genesis and Rise of Sofia School of Crystal Growth M
    Bulgarian Chemical Communications, Volume 49 Special Issue C (pp. 23 – 41) 2017 Rostislaw Kaischew and his trace in the fundamental science. A brief historical overview of the genesis and rise of Sofia School of crystal growth M. Michailov Rostislaw Kaischew Institute of Physical Chemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Science, Аcad. G. Bonchev Str., bl. 11, 1113 Sofia,Bulgaria The process of nucleation and growth of crystals has great educational, historical and moral standing. is one of the most exotic phenomena in nature. This is because the birth and rise of the scientific Starting from disordered ensembles and small schools and their ideas mirror the noetic values of clusters of single atoms and molecules, matter mankind at the actual historical time [9-12]. organizes itself in beautiful figures and shapes with Prof. Iwan Stranski and prof. Rostislaw immaculate symmetry and ordering, ideal cubes, Kaischew, the founders of the most famous pyramids, needles, dendrites. These ensembles of Bulgarian scientific school have a dramatic crystal shapes and their divine beauty attend our personal and scientific destiny. Their illustrious entire being and consciousness, our entire life, they academic and research activity plays a key role in are everywhere around us. This incredible art of Bulgarian science as well as in the development of nature is generated spontaneously, without any the most important scientific institutions – the „St. influence of human mind, thinking, desire or action. Kliment Ohridski“ University of Sofia and the Why is this occurring and how? Where the science Bulgarian Academy of Sciences [2,4,5]. meets the unfathomable loveliness and marvelous aesthetics of the art of crystal growth? A substantial contribution in answering these fundamental questions of condensed matter physics is given by a very bright generation of Bulgarian scientists in the last century [1-8].
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Today 2009, Reproduced with Kind Permission of the the Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford
    A refuge for the persecuted, release for the fettered mind An organisation set up in 1933 to find work for refugee academics is still very much in business. Georgina Ferry reports. Seventy years ago, on 5 February 1939, the great and the good of Oxford poured into the Sheldonian to hear distinguished speakers address 'The Problem of the refugee Scholar'. The aim was to persuade the University and its colleges to open their hearts and their pockets to academics from countries where fascism had deprived them of their livelihood and of the opportunity to teach and research. On the platform was Lord Samuel, former Home Secretary and head of the Council for German Jewry, and Sir John Hope Simpson, the former Indian civil servant whose subsequent career as a colonial administrator had frequently focused on migration, forced and otherwise, in countries as diverse as Kenya and Palestine. Both were Balliol men. Distinguished Oxford figures including the Master of Balliol, A D Lindsay, the Provost of Oriel, Sir William David Ross, and the regius Professor of Medicine, Sir Edward Farquhar Buzzard - had worked indefatigably over the previous five years to create the conditions in which the University would be prepared to stage a high-profile event in such a cause. It all began in 1933, when Sir William Beveridge, then director of the London School of Economics (and subsequently Master of Univ), was on a study trip to Vienna. Reading in a newspaper that, since Adolf Hitler's recent rise to power, Jewish and other non-Nazi professors were losing their jobs in German universities, Beveridge returned to England and mobilised many of his influential friends to form the academic assistance Council (AAC).
    [Show full text]
  • The First 100 Years
    PWApr11leader 21/3/11 17:46 Page 17 physicsworld.com Superconductivity Physics World Dirac House, Temple Back, Bristol BS1 6BE, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 929 7481 Fax: +44 (0)117 925 1942 E-mail: [email protected] Web: physicsworld.com Consortium/Science Photo Library c T Editor Matin Durrani Associate Editor Dens Milne News Editor Michael Banks Reviews and Careers Editor Margaret Harris Features Editor Louise Mayor Production Editor Kate Gardner Web Editor Hamish Johnston Web Reporter James Dacey Advisory Panel John Ellis CERN, Peter Knight Imperial College London, Martin Rees University of Cambridge David Parker/IMI/Birmingham Uni. High Publisher Susan Curtis Marketing and circulation Gemma Bailey Display Advertisement Sales Edward Jost Recruitment Advertisement Sales Chris Thomas Advertisement Production Mark Trimnell The first 100 years Diagram Artist Alison Tovey Physics World celebrates the centenary of the discovery of superconductivity Head of B2B and Marketing Jo Allen Art Director Andrew Giaquinto Kwik nagenoeg nul. Scrawled in a lab notebook by the Dutch low-temperature physi- cist Heike Kamerlingh Onnes on 8 April 1911, these words are what signalled that Subscription information 2011 volume The subscription rates for institutions are superconductivity – that mysterious and bizarre phenomenon of condensed-matter £320/7480/$610 per annum. Single issues are physics – had been discovered. Onnes, together with his colleague Gilles Holst, had £27.00/740.00/$51.00. found that the resistance of mercury, when chilled to a temperature of below 4.2 K, Orders to: IOP Circulation Centre, CDS Global, Tower House, Lathkill Street, Sovereign Park, fell to practically zero – the hallmark of superconductivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Encyclopedia of Scientific Principles, Laws, and Theories
    Encyclopedia of Scientific Principles, Laws, and Theories Volume 2: L–Z Robert E. Krebs Illustrations by Rae Dejur Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Krebs, Robert E., 1922– Encyclopedia of scientific principles, laws, and theories / Robert E. Krebs ; illustrations by Rae Dejur. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN: 978-0-313-34005-5 (set : alk. paper) ISBN: 978-0-313-34006-2 (vol. 1 : alk. paper) ISBN: 978-0-313-34007-9 (vol. 2 : alk. paper) 1. Science—Encyclopedias. 2. Science—History—Encyclopedias. 3. Physical laws— Encyclopedias. I. Title. Q121.K74 2008 503—dc22 2008002345 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data is available. Copyright C 2008 by Robert E. Krebs All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 2008002345 ISBN: 978-0-313-34005-5 (set) 978-0-313-34006-2 (vol. 1) 978-0-313-34007-9 (vol. 2) First published in 2008 Greenwood Press, 88 Post Road West, Westport, CT 06881 An imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. www.greenwood.com Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this book complies with the Permanent Paper Standard issued by the National Information Standards Organization (Z39.48–1984). 10987654321 L LAGRANGE’S MATHEMATICAL THEOREMS: Mathematics: Comte Joseph-Louis Lagrange (1736–1813), France. Lagrange’s theory of algebraic equations: Cubic and quartic equations can be solved algebraically without using geometry. Lagrange was able to solve cubic and quartic (fourth power) equations without the aid of geometry, but not fifth-degree (quintic) equations.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiment, Time and Theory
    Experiment, Time and Theory Faculty of Arts Thesis for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy at the University of Antwerp to be defended by Jan Potters Experiment, Time and Theory On the Scientific Exploration of the Unobservable Antwerp 2019 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Bert Leuridan Faculteit Letteren & Wijsbegeerte Verhandeling neergelegd voor de graad van Doctor in de Wijsbegeerte Aan de Universiteit Antwerpen Verdedigd door Jan Potters Experiment, Tijd en Theorie Over de wetenschappelijke exploratie van het onobserveerbare Antwerpen 2019 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Bert Leuridan L'anthropologie est l`apour nous le rappeler, le passage du temps peut s'interpr´eterde multiples fa¸cons,comme cycle ou comme d´ecadence, comme chute ou comme instabilit´e,comme retour ou comme pr´esence continu´ee.Appelons temporalit´e l'interpr´etationde ce passage pour bien la distinguer du temps. Les modernes ont pour particularit´ede comprendre le temps qui passe comme s'il abolissait r´eellement le pass´e derri`ere lui. Ils se prennent tous pour Attilla derri`ere qui l'herbe ne repoussait plus. Ils ne se sentent pas ´eloign´esdu Moyen Age^ par un certain nombre de si`ecles,mais s´epar´esde lui par des r´evolutionscoperniciennes, des coupures ´epist´emologiques, des ruptures ´epist´emiquesqui sont tellement radicales que plus rien ne survit en eux de ce pass´e{ que plus rien ne doit survivre en eux de ce pass´e. Nous n'avons jamais et´ e´ modernes Bruno Latour Contents Contents v Acknowledgments vii Introduction 1 1 Manipulation and the Realist Anthropology 3 1.1 Introduction . .3 1.2 Hacking's Anthropological Origin-Myth .
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen Blundelltells of How Fritz London and His Younger Brother
    Superconductivity: Fritz and Heinz London physicsworld.com iStockphoto.com/RichVintage The forgotten brothers Stephen Blundell tells of how Fritz London and his younger brother Heinz cracked the decades-long mystery of superconductivity, but wonders why their achievement is still overlooked today In 1934 two brothers Fritz and Heinz London, both tion by Fritz London that both superconductors and refugees from Nazi Germany, were working in an up- superfluid helium are macroscopic quantum systems.” stairs room in a rented house in Oxford. There they Before then, quantum theory had only been thought to solved what was then one of the biggest problems in account for the properties of atoms and molecules at superconductivity, a phenomenon discovered 23 years the microscopic level. As Bardeen explained, “It was earlier. The moment of discovery seems to have been Fritz London who first recognized that superconduc- sudden: Fritz shouted down to his wife “Edith, Edith tivity and superfluidity result from manifestations of come, we have it! Come up, we have it!” She later re- quantum phenomena on the scale of large objects.” called, “I left everything, ran up and then the door was But despite Fritz’s leading role in the breakthrough opened into my face. On my forehead I had a bruise for that solved one of the knottiest conundrums of the a week.” As Edith recovered from her knock, Fritz told early 20th century, he did not secure a permanent job her with delight “The equations are established – we at the University of Oxford once his temporary con- have the solution. We can explain it.” tract was up.
    [Show full text]
  • A Piece of Apparatus Designed by Boltzmann To
    Newsletter No 22 August 2007 Cover picture: An early demonstration version of a light modulator, rather grandly called an Acetylene Photophone c1920. Taken from ‘The Moon Element’ by E.E. Fournier D’Albe. TF Unwin, 1924. Contents Editorial 2 Meetings Reports Physics at the Clarendon Laboratory 3 Lectures: Theoretical Physics in Oxford by Roger Elliot 4 Frederick Lindemann by Adrian Fort 12 Features: Why Physics Needs Oral History by Jim Grozier 22 Sir Joseph Rotblat and the Forgotten Physicists by Neil Brown 30 Physics in Heaven and on Earth by Peter Schuster 34 Hibbert’s Magnetic Balance by Stuart Leadstone 38 Book reviews Thomas Young – The last Man Who Knew Everything 51 From Clockwork to Crapshoot – A History of Physics 58 Patrick Blackett – Sailor, Scientist and Socialist 61 Book notices 67 Letters 68 Web news 70 Forthcoming meetings 71 Committee and contacts 72 2 Editorial The history of physics (and of chemistry and mathematics) gets little serious exposure in the popular media and comic, almost never. But do you remember the 60’s American comedian, pianist (and mathematician), Tom Lehrer, who sang a song, the words of which consisted of nothing (well, almost) but the chemical elements? He also sang about the Russian mathematician, Nikolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky, (famous for his introducing non-Euclidian geometry), and told a story of a remote tribe in the Andes who furtively practised gargling, passing the secret down from father to son as part of their oral tradition. As he would have said, that last was just a sneaky way of commenting that our oral tradition is none too strong but on page 22, Jim Grozier presents a thoughtful case for pursuing this aspect with all vigour, in his article on a history of the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment.
    [Show full text]
  • Applied Superconductivity: Josephson Effects and Superconducting
    Chapter 1 Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena 1.1 The Macroscopic Quantum Model One of the main principles of quantum mechanics is the fact that physical quantities such as energy or momentum are, under certain conditions, quantized. That is, they can have only discrete values. How- ever, for a long time it was believed that quantization is relevant only for microscopic objects such as nuclei, atoms or molecules. Indeed, if we are considering the behavior of macroscopic objects consisting of a large number of atoms, quantization effects cannot be observed, although every single atom obeys the laws of quantum mechanics. This is due to the fact that thermal motion masks quantum regulari- ties. However, for a number of phenomena, in particular superconductivity, it has been found that it is possible to observe macroscopic quantization. That is, we can observe quantization of parameters that characterize macroscopic objects (for example the flux through a superconducting ring of macroscopic dimension) many orders of magnitude larger than microscopic objects like atoms. As will be discussed in the following, this is caused by the fact that the electron system in a superconductor is highly correlated due to coherence effects. Then we have to consider all superconducting electrons as a single quantum mechanical entity. 1.1.1 Coherent Phenomena in Superconductivity Although superconductivity has been discovered already in 1911,1 it took many decades until a modern concept for the superconducting state has been developed. The main milestones along the way towards a deeper understanding of superconductivity have been the discovery of the Meißner-Ochsenfeld effect2 by Walther Meißner and Robert Ochsenfeld in 1933, the development of the phenomenological the- ories by Fritz and Heinz London3 and V.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Isaiah Berlin Notes on the FOUNDATION
    Who would not ʃingfor Lycidas? ARTICLES POETRY Isaiah Berlin Bertolt Brecht Notes on the Foundation of A Worker Reads, and asks these Wolfson College Questions 30 Nigel Derrett 2 Vietnamese Haiku 28 Jerome Bruner Henry Graham Human Development Good Luck to you Kafka/ You'll need it Boss 30 5 George Jones Stephen Gardiner The Yellow Submarine 13 The White Space 16 Philip Larkin Arnold Mallinson Mr Bleaney 30 Introducing Numismatology 18 Arnold Mallinson Andrew Prentice Joan (or The Relic) 20 The Origin of the Solar System 11 Geoffrey Masefield John Wain One Poet's Advice to Others 31 Poet in Residence? 14 Peter Redgrove Brothel Allotment 30 REVIEWS Tao Tao Sanders Michael Argyle The Psychology of Two Chinese Ballads from the Han 21,34 Interpersonal Zaituna f/mer(with Elizabeth Jennings) Behaviour (Vincent Hetreed) 22 Compass Round the Soul 31 The Social Psychology of Work (Edmund Rolls) 22 COLLEGE RECORD Isaiah Berlin Construction of the College Buildings: Fathers and Children (Angus Walker) 23 Principal Dates 38 Michael Brock 1972-1973 35 The Great Reform Act (Kim Roberts) 24 Lists 40 Michael Chanan Logic Lane: films on College Officers 40 Oxford philosophy Elections and Admissions 40 (Christopher Schenk) 29 Degrees and Diplomas 49 Geoffrey Masefield A History of the Professional News 50 Colonial Agricultural Books 51 Service (Kenneth Hunt) 25 Personal News 51 Kurt Mendelssohn Wolfson College Trust 52 The World of Walter Nernst: the Rise and Fall of German Science EDITORIAL (Margaret Gowing) 26 David Robey (ed.) 1 Structuralism (Samuel Guttenplan) 27 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 33 Geza Vermes ACADEMIC LIFE 32 Jesus the Jew (Tessa Rajak) 28 The editor would like to thank all those who have contributed to this issue: Photocopying of any part of this magazine is prohibited: extra copies may both those who provided articles, poems, photographs etc., and those who be purchased from the College Office, 47 Banbury Road.
    [Show full text]