DOCSLIB.ORG

Flood Insurance Study Number 48157Cv000a Notice to Flood Insurance Study Users

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flood Insurance Study Number 48157Cv000a Notice to Flood Insurance Study Users FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Community Name Number ARCOLA, CITY OF 481619 FAIRCHILDS, VILLAGE OF 481675 FIRST COLONY L.I.D. 481583 FORT BEND COUNTY L.I.D. NO. 2 481485 FORT BEND COUNTY L.I.D. NO. 7 481594 FORT BEND COUNTY M.U.D. NO. 2 481272 FORT BEND COUNTY M.U.D. NO. 23 481590 FORT BEND COUNTY M.U.D. NO. 25 481570 FORT BEND COUNTY M.U.D. NO. 34 481520 FORT BEND COUNTY M.U.D. NO. 35 481519 FORT BEND COUNTY M.U.D. NO. 41 481591 FORT BEND COUNTY M.U.D. NO. 42 481605 FORT BEND COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS 480228 COMMUNITIES WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD FULSHEAR, CITY OF 481488 HAZARD AREAS IDENTIFIED HOUSTON, CITY OF 480296 Community Community KATY, CITY OF 480301 KENDLETON, CITY OF 481551 Name Number KINGSBRIDGE M.U.D. 481567 BEASLEY, CITY OF 481654 MISSOURI CITY, CITY OF 480304 BIG OAKS M.U.D. 481596 NEEDVILLE, CITY OF 480820 CHELFORD CITY M.U.D. 481568 PEARLAND, CITY OF 480077 FORT BEND COUNTY M.U.D. NO. 30 481601 PECAN GROVE M.U.D. 481486 MEADOWS PLACE, CITY OF 481563 PLEAK, VILLAGE OF 481615 MISSION BEND M.U.D. NO. 1 481578 RICHMOND, CITY OF 480231 ORCHARD, CITY OF 481655 ROSENBERG, CITY OF 480232 SIMONTON, CITY OF 481564 STAFFORD, CITY OF 480233 SUGAR LAND, CITY OF 480234 THOMPSONS, TOWN OF 481642 WESTON LAKES, CITY OF 481197 WEST KEEGANS BAYOU I.D. 481602 WILLOW FORK DRAINAGE DISTRICT 481603 Revised: April 2, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 48157CV000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current Flood Insurance Study components. Initial Countywide Flood Insurance Study Date Effective Date: September 30, 1992 First Revised Countywide Flood Insurance Study Date: January 3, 1997 Second Revised Countywide Flood Insurance Study Date: April 20, 2000 Third Revised Countywide Flood Insurance Study Date: November 7, 2001 Fourth Revised Countywide Flood Insurance Study Date: April 2, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments ....................................................................................... 1 1.3 Coordination ....................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 AREA STUDIED ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Scope of Study .................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Community Description ...................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Principal Flood Problems .................................................................................................. 10 2.4 Flood Protection Measures ............................................................................................ ...10 3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS .................................................................................................... .12 3.1 Hydrologic Analyses ......................................................................................................... 13 3.1.1 New Detailed Study Streams ............................................................................................ 13 3.1.2 Redelineated Detailed Study Streams .............................................................................. 14 3.1.3 Enhanced Approximate Study Streams ............................................................................. 24 3.2 Hydraulic Analyses ........................................................................................................... 25 3.2.1 New Detailed Study Streams ............................................................................................ 25 3.2.2 Redelineated Detailed Study Streams ............................................................................... 26 3.2.3 Enhanced Approximate Study Streams ............................................................................. 28 3.3 Vertical Datum .................................................................................................................. 29 3.4 Land Subsidence ............................................................................................................... 29 4.0 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATION ................................................................. 34 4.1 Floodplain Boundaries ...................................................................................................... 34 4.2 Floodways ......................................................................................................................... 35 5.0 INSURANCE APPLICATION ................................................................................................... 59 6.0 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP .......................................................................................... 59 7.0 OTHER STUDIES ....................................................................................................................... 64 8.0 LOCATION OF DATA ............................................................................................................... 64 9.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES ................................................................................... 64 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont’d) Page FIGURES Figure 1 – NGS-HGCSD Benchmarks ....................................................................................................... 31 Figure 2 – Fort Bend Subsidence Adjustment Values from 1973 to 2000 ................................................. 31 Figure 3 – Land Subsidence Schematic ...................................................................................................... 33 Figure 4 – Floodway Schematic.................................................................................................................. 35 TABLES Table 1 – Scope of Study .............................................................................................................................. 5 Table 2 – Letters of Map Revision ................................................................................................................ 7 Table 3 – Levees in the Brazos River ........................................................................................................ 12 Table 4 – Redelineated Detailed Study Streams ......................................................................................... 14 Table 5 – Summary of Discharges .............................................................................................................. 16 Table 6 – Summary of Stillwater Elevations .............................................................................................. 23 Table 7 – Enhanced Approximate Study Streams ...................................................................................... 24 Table 8 – Subsidence Adjustment Values for Redelineated Streams ......................................................... 26 Table 9 – Manning’s “n” Values................................................................................................................. 28 Table 10 – Floodway Data Table ................................................................................................................ 37 Table 11 – Community Map History .......................................................................................................... 60 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 – Flood Profiles Alcorn Bayou Panel 01P Brazos River Panels 02P-20P Cane Island Branch Panel 21P Clear Creek Panel 22P Clodine Ditch/Long Point Slough Panel 23P Coon Creek Panels 24P-26P Cow Creek Panels 27P-28P Dry Creek Panels 29P-33P Keegans Bayou Panels 34P-35P Little Prong Buffalo Bayou - Panel Removed Panel 36P Little Prong Buffalo Bayou Side Channel Panel 37P Long Point Creek Panel 38P Long Point Creek East Fork Panel 39P Lower Oyster Creek Panels 40P-41P Mustang Bayou Panels 42P-43P Mustang Bayou Diversion Channel Panel 44P North Branch Dry Creek Panel 45P ii Oyster Creek Panels 46P-52P Red Gully Panels 53P-54P San Bernard River Panels 55P-56P Seabourne Creek Panels 57P-59P Snake Creek Panel 60P Snake Slough Panel 61P Stafford Run Panels 62P-63P Steep Bank Creek Panel 64P Tributary 20.25 to Sims Bayou Panel 64 (a)P Willow Fork Buffalo Bayou Panels 65P-67P Willow Fork Diversion Channel Panel 68P Exhibit 2 – Flood Insurance Rate Map Index Flood Insurance Rate Maps iii FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS AND INCORPORATED AREAS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of Study This Flood
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Listing of Texas Ports
    TRANSPORTATION Policy Research CENTER Overview: Texas Ports and Navigation Districts The first Navigation District was established in 1909, and there are now 24 Navigation Districts statewide.1 Navigation districts generally provide for the construction and improvement of waterways in Texas for the purpose of navigation. The creation of navigation districts is authorized in two different articles of the Texas Constitution to serve different purposes. Section 52, Article III, authorizes counties, cities, and other political corporations or subdivisions to issue bonds and levy taxes for the purposes of improving rivers, bays, creeks, streams, and canals to prevent overflow, to provide irrigation, and to permit navigation. Section 59, Article XVI, authorizes the creation of conservation and reclamation districts for the purpose of conserving and developing natural resources, including the improvement, preservation, and conservation of inland and coastal water for navigation and controlling storm water and floodwater of rivers and streams in aid of navigation. This section authorizes conservation and reclamation districts to issue bonds and levy taxes for those purposes. Generally, however, navigation districts are structured, governed, and financed in the same manner. Chapters 60 through 63, Texas Water Code, set forth provisions relating to navigation districts. The purposes and functions of navigation districts are very similar, regardless of the Chapter of the Water Code under which they were created. More than one chapter of the Water Code may be applicable to the manner in which a given navigation district conducts its business. Chapter 61 (Article III, Section 52, Navigation Districts) authorizes the creation of districts to operate under Section 52, Article III, Texas Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Beach and Bay Access Guide
    Texas Beach & Bay Access Guide Second Edition Texas General Land Office Jerry Patterson, Commissioner The Texas Gulf Coast The Texas Gulf Coast consists of cordgrass marshes, which support a rich array of marine life and provide wintering grounds for birds, and scattered coastal tallgrass and mid-grass prairies. The annual rainfall for the Texas Coast ranges from 25 to 55 inches and supports morning glories, sea ox-eyes, and beach evening primroses. Click on a region of the Texas coast The Texas General Land Office makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information depicted on these maps, or the data from which it was produced. These maps are NOT suitable for navigational purposes and do not purport to depict or establish boundaries between private and public land. Contents I. Introduction 1 II. How to Use This Guide 3 III. Beach and Bay Public Access Sites A. Southeast Texas 7 (Jefferson and Orange Counties) 1. Map 2. Area information 3. Activities/Facilities B. Houston-Galveston (Brazoria, Chambers, Galveston, Harris, and Matagorda Counties) 21 1. Map 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities C. Golden Crescent (Calhoun, Jackson and Victoria Counties) 1. Map 79 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities D. Coastal Bend (Aransas, Kenedy, Kleberg, Nueces, Refugio and San Patricio Counties) 1. Map 96 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities E. Lower Rio Grande Valley (Cameron and Willacy Counties) 1. Map 2. Area Information 128 3. Activities/Facilities IV. National Wildlife Refuges V. Wildlife Management Areas VI. Chambers of Commerce and Visitor Centers 139 143 147 Introduction It’s no wonder that coastal communities are the most densely populated and fastest growing areas in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Equations for Estimation of Peak-Streamflow Frequency for Natural Basins in Texas
    REGIONAL EQUATIONS FOR ESTIMATION OF PEAK-STREAMFLOW FREQUENCY FOR NATURAL BASINS IN TEXAS U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96–4307 b QT = cA PEAK DISCHARGE FOR STREAMFLOW-GAGING STATION STREAMFLOW-GAGING FOR DISCHARGE PEAK CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA Prepared in cooperation with the TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGIONAL EQUATIONS FOR ESTIMATION OF PEAK-STREAMFLOW FREQUENCY FOR NATURAL BASINS IN TEXAS By William H. Asquith and Raymond M. Slade, Jr. U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96–4307 Prepared in cooperation with the TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Austin, Texas 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Acting Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 8011 Cameron Rd. Box 25286 Austin, TX 78754–3898 Denver, CO 80225–0286 ii CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Scope ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • U N S U U S E U R a C S
    WALLER MONTGOMERY Prairie S 6 2 1 t DISTRICT 8 H 3 MONTGOMERY 4 View w 6 y Tomball y Waller DISTRICT East Fork San w H Jacinto River t StLp 494 Dayton LEE Spring 8 S S China tH Pine Island w Liberty Ames y Nome 7 DISTRICT y S Devers 1 7 w t 3 H H 2 59 w S 1 y y 10 w t LIBERTY H H 9 2 Smithville t 5 4 w 1 S y Hempstead 9 Eastex y w Fwy 3 H 6 Hwy Atascocita DISTRICT S S S t H wy 159 DISTRICT t tH 9 Industry S 5 Lake Houston H 2 w 1 y 110th Congress of the United States w t y S Hw y w 7 tH y w Humble H y 1 w 15 t H 18 1 y 159 9 t on 4 4 S m u 6 JEFFERSON 0 a 3 e 1 y 71 Bellville B 6 w StHwy N y o w tH DISTRICT rt h H S we S t s t S Cedar Creek Reservoir t F Jersey L w p 10 y Village 8 Old River- 6 ( Crosby N Winfree y Aldine La Grange o w Fayetteville r H t t h S y B Hw e nt 4 StHwy 36 o r l eaum 2 WALLER t B e ) 1 v Sheldon i y Lake Charlotte Hw Lost R t Barrett S Lake y t C i e n 5 DISTRICT HARRIS d Mont a ri 9 r B Belvieu T y San Jacinto yu w 7 StHwy 73 H River t Beaumont S Hwy Cloverleaf 1 Winnie Pattison Hilshire 6 Highlands Lake Katy Village y Spring Cove Cotton Lake Anahuac w H StHwy 65 S Channelview t t Valley H S w San Hwy Jacinto Stowell BASTROP y Brookshire 7 1 Felipe Katy Blvd City Hedwig Village Hunters Old Alligator Sealy Fwy Creek River Bayou Anahuac Village Baytown CALDWELL Houston Piney Beach Bunker Hill e Scott Bay Point d Galena i 6 City Village Village West University s 4 Cinco y Park DISTRICT 1 a Dr Bessies Cr ) Place y AUSTIN Ranch y W w w H FAYETTE k 29 t P S Ma Columbus FM n adena Fwy CHAMBERS in o as S P Weimar FM
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Selected Streamflow Statistics at 19 Long-Term Streamflow-Gaging Stations Indicative of Outflows from Texas to Arkansas, Louisiana, Galveston Bay, and the Gulf of Mexico, 1922
    PreparedPrepared inin cooperationcooperation withwith thethe TexasTexas WaterWater DevelopmentDevelopment BoardBoard TrendsTrends inin SelectedSelected StreamflowStreamflow StatisticsStatistics atat 1919 Long-TermLong-Term Streamflow-GagingStreamflow-Gaging StationsStations IndicativeIndicative ofof OutflowsOutflows fromfrom TexasTexas toto Arkansas,Arkansas, Louisiana,Louisiana, GalvestonGalveston Bay,Bay, andand thethe GulfGulf ofof Mexico,Mexico, 1922–20091922–2009 Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5182 Revised September 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Background, Looking towards the right bank of the Sabine River during a flood measurement at stream- flow-gaging station 08030500 - Sabine River near Ruliff, Texas, on October 23, 2006. Photograph by Doug McGhee, U.S. Geological Survey. Front cover: Left, Discharge measurement at streamflow-gaging station 08117500 - San Bernard River near Boling, Texas. Photograph by Mac Cherry, U.S. Geological Survey on April 1, 2007. Right, Gage shelter raised above 200-year flood-plain level at 08114000 - Brazos River at Richmond, Texas, January 15, 2007. Photograph by Joe Stuart, U.S. Geological Survey. Back cover: Left, U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging station 08475000 - Rio Grande near Brownsville, Texas, August 18, 2010. Photograph by Jaimie Ingold, U.S. Geological Survey. Right, Gage shelter and wire-weight gage at 08041000 - Neches River near Evadale, Texas. Photograph by Joe Stuart, November 17, 2006. Trends in Selected Streamflow Statistics at 19 Long-Term Streamflow-Gaging Stations Indicative of Outflows from Texas to Arkansas, Louisiana, Galveston Bay, and the Gulf of Mexico, 1922–2009 By Dana L. Barbie and Loren L. Wehmeyer Prepared in cooperation with the Texas Water Development Board Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5182 Revised September 2012 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bookletchart™ San Luis Pass to East Matagorda Bay NOAA Chart 11321
    BookletChart™ San Luis Pass to East Matagorda Bay NOAA Chart 11321 A reduced-scale NOAA nautical chart for small boaters When possible, use the full-size NOAA chart for navigation. Included Area Published by the old river channel is now a tidal estuary and the harbor is protected against flood conditions in the river. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Vessels should approach Freeport Harbor through the prescribed National Ocean Service Safety Fairways. (See 166.100 through 166.200, chapter 2.) Office of Coast Survey Anchorages.–Vessels should anchor off the entrance to Freeport Harbor in the Freeport Fairway Anchorage. (See 166.100 through 166.200, www.NauticalCharts.NOAA.gov chapter 2.) 888-990-NOAA Dangers.–About 6 miles SW of the entrance to Freeport Harbor, Brazos River has generated a shoal extending about 5 miles into the Gulf off the What are Nautical Charts? mouth of the river. This area is foul and should be given a wide berth. It is reported that several vessels have stranded in this vicinity and that Nautical charts are a fundamental tool of marine navigation. They show the depths are considerably less than charted. The bottom is soft mud, water depths, obstructions, buoys, other aids to navigation, and much indicating that silting from the river has occurred. more. The information is shown in a way that promotes safe and Oil drilling structures may be erected in the Gulf near the approach to efficient navigation. Chart carriage is mandatory on the commercial Freeport Harbor. Mariners should be on the lookout for these structures ships that carry America’s commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • San Bernard River Watershed Data Report April 2018
    San Bernard River Watershed Data Report April 2018 Table of Contents The preparation of this report was prepared in cooperation with, and financed through, grants from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Watershed Location and Physical Description ............................................................................................. 7 Location and Climate ................................................................................................................................ 7 Physical Description and Land Use .......................................................................................................... 7 Wildlife and Wildlife Refuges .................................................................................................................. 7 History ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 TMDL & Watershed Protection ................................................................................................................ 8 Water Quality Parameters ............................................................................................................................. 9 Water Temperature ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TPWD Strategic Planning Regions
    River Basins TPWD Brazos River Basin Brazos-Colorado Coastal Basin W o lf Cr eek Canadian River Basin R ita B l anca C r e e k e e ancar Cl ita B R Strategic Planning Colorado River Basin Colorado-Lavaca Coastal Basin Canadian River Cypress Creek Basin Regions Guadalupe River Basin Nor t h F o r k of the R e d R i ver XAmarillo Lavaca River Basin 10 Salt Fork of the Red River Lavaca-Guadalupe Coastal Basin Neches River Basin P r air i e Dog To w n F o r k of the R e d R i ver Neches-Trinity Coastal Basin ® Nueces River Basin Nor t h P e as e R i ve r Nueces-Rio Grande Coastal Basin Pease River Red River Basin White River Tongue River 6a Wi chita R iver W i chita R i ver Rio Grande River Basin Nor t h Wi chita R iver Little Wichita River South Wichita Ri ver Lubbock Trinity River Sabine River Basin X Nor t h Sulphur R i v e r Brazos River West Fork of the Trinity River San Antonio River Basin Brazos River Sulphur R i v e r South Sulphur River San Antonio-Nueces Coastal Basin 9 Clear Fork Tr Plano San Jacinto River Basin X Cypre ss Creek Garland FortWorth Irving X Sabine River in San Jacinto-Brazos Coastal Basin ity Rive X Clea r F o r k of the B r az os R i v e r XTr n X iityX RiverMesqu ite Sulphur River Basin r XX Dallas Arlington Grand Prai rie Sabine River Trinity River Basin XAbilene Paluxy River Leon River Trinity-San Jacinto Coastal Basin Chambers Creek Brazos River Attoyac Bayou XEl Paso R i c h land Cr ee k Colorado River 8 Pecan Bayou 5a Navasota River Neches River Waco Angelina River Concho River X Colorado River 7 Lampasas
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrologic, Water-Quality, and Biological Data for Three Water Bodies, Texas Gulf Coastal Plain, 2000-2002
    science for a changing world In cooperation with the Houston-Galveston Area Council and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Hydrologic, Water-Quality, and Biological Data for Three Water Bodies, Texas Gulf Coastal Plain, 2000-2002 Open-File Report 03-459 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic, Water-Quality, and Biological Data for Three Water Bodies, Texas Gulf Coastal Plain, 2000-2002 By Jeffery W. East and Jennifer L. Hogan U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 03-459 In cooperation with the Houston-Galveston Area Council and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Austin, Texas 2003 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 8027 Exchange Dr. Austin, TX 78754-4733 E-mail: [email protected] Copies of this report can be purchased from U.S. Geological Survey Information Services Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225-0286 E-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................................................................................^ 1 Introduction ....................................................................... 1 Purpose and Scope ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Summary Chart
    REGIONAL WATER 2017 QUALITY SUMMARY The numbers represent the percent of total segment length that is impaired or of concern for each parameter. Cells without numbers (blanks) represent stream segments that are currently meeting state standards but may be improving or degrading for each parameter. Basin Watershed Segment DO Bact Chlor Nut PCB Other* Frogs Trinity-San Cedar Bayou Tidal 0901 100 100 100 100 X Jacinto Coastal Cedar Bayou Above Tidal 0902 100 X X X X Buffalo Bayou Above Tidal 1014 11 78.3 70.2 2.3 X X X Buffalo Bayou Tidal 1013 37.4 86.8 54.1 32.7 X X Caney Creek 1010 16.8 59.6 X X X Cypress Creek 1009 28.7 77.7 77.7 11.7 X X X East Fork San Jacinto River 1003 63.7 X X X X Greens Bayou Above Tidal 1016 12 95.9 85.6 X X X Houston Ship Channel 1006 16 47.4 6.5 87.7 36.3 36.3 X X Houston Ship Channel Buffalo Bayou Tidal 1007 19 67.7 84.9 28.6 28.6 X X Houston Ship Channel/ San Jacinto River Tidal 1005 82.2 100 82.2 X X X X X X X San Jacinto Lake Conroe 1012 11 River Lake Creek 1015 70.8 12.1 30.7 X X X Lake Houston 1002 20.9 7 15 43.9 0.1 X X X X Peach Creek 1011 100 X X X San Jacinto River Tidal 1001 36.5 36.5 X X X Spring Creek 1008 47.8 72.9 1.2 23.6 8.9 X X X West Fork San Jacinto River 1004 57.7 25.8 X X X X White Oak Bayou Above Tidal 1017 11.7 87 83.2 X X Armand Bayou Tidal 1113 61.4 73.7 23.7 16.9 23.7 11.6 X X X Bastrop Bayou Tidal 1105 76.7 86.3 5.9 X X X Chocolate Bayou Above Tidal 1108 100 X X X Chocolate Bayou Tidal 1107 100 100 X Clear Creek Above Tidal 1102 53.3 82.5 72.2 49.4 13.4 X Clear Creek Tidal 1101 27.9
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Gulf of Mexico Estuarine Inventory and Study, Texas : Area Description
    NOAA TECHNICAL REPORTS National Marine Fisheries Service, Circulars The major responsibilities of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) are to monitor and assess the abundance and geographic distribution of fishery resources, to understand and predict fluctuations in the quantity and distribution of t hese resources, and to establish levels for optimum use of the resources. NMFS is also charged with the development and implementation of policies for managing national fishing grounds, development and enforcement of domestic fiSheries regulations. surveillance of foreign fishing off United States coastal waters, and the development and enforcement of international fishery agreements and policies. NMFS also assists the fishing industry through marketing service and economic analysis programs, and mortgage insurance and vessel construction subsidies. It collects. analyzes, and publishes statistics on various phases of the industry. The NOAA Technical Report NMFSCIRC series continues a series that has been in existence since 1941. The Circulars are technical publications of general interest intended to aid conservation and management. Pubfications that review in considerable detail and at a hi~h technical level certain broad areas of research appear in this series. Technical papers originating in economics studies and from management investigations appear m the Circular series. NOAA Technical Re ports NMFS CIRC are available free in limited numbers to governmental agencies, both Federal and State. They are also available in exchange for other scientific and technical publications in the marine sciences. Individual copies may be obtained (unless otherwise noted) from 083, Technical Information Division, Environmental Science Information Center, NOAA, Washington, D.C. 20235. Recent Circulars are: 315. Synopsis of biological data on the chum salmon.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoarchaeological and Archaeological Investigations of the BZT-1 Prehistoric Woman Brazoria County, Texas
    BZT Cover.qxd 5/9/05 10:37 AM Page 1 The BZT-1 Prehistoric Woman, Brazoria County, Texas Brazoria County, Prehistoric Woman, The BZT-1 d’Aigle,Bradle andBernhardt The BZT-1 Prehistoric Woman Brazoria County, Texas Robert P. d’Aigle Michael R. Bradle Gilbert T. Bernhardt Archeological Resources Protection Act April 2005 Geoarchaeological and Archaeological Investigations of The BZT-1 Prehistoric Woman Brazoria County, Texas Prepared for: The U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service The Department of the Interior Albuquerque, New Mexico Archaeological Resources Protection Act Permit (ARPA) Dated: 02-07-2003 Robert P. d'Aigle, RPA, Principal Investigator CRC, International Archaeology & Ecology, LLC 7400 Jones Drive, Suite 313 Galveston, Texas 77551 And Michael R. Bradle Gilbert T. Bernhardt American Archaeology Group, LLC 1211 W. Fourth Street Lampasas, TX 76550 With contributions by: Robson Bonnichsen, PhD John Jones, PhD Michael Waters, PhD Jason Wiersema April 2005 Geoarchaeological and Archaeological Investigations of The BZT-1 Prehistoric Woman Brazoria County, Texas Robert P. d'Aigle, RPA, Principal Investigator CRC, International Archaeology & Ecology, LLC 7400 Jones Drive, Suite 313 Galveston, Texas 77551 And Michael R. Bradle Gilbert T. Bernhardt American Archaeology Group, LLC 1211 W. Fourth Street Lampasas, TX 76550 April 2005 Acknowledgements We express our appreciation to Bob Pickering, Ariane Pinson, Wera Schmerer, Michael Blum, James Adovasio, Michael Faught, Ron Hatfield, and the staff at the San Bernard National Wildlife Refuge for their personal assistance for this ARPA investigation. It must be noted that CRC, International Archaeology & Ecology, LLC and American Archaeology Group, LLC provided all of their effort, time, and expenditures, including the publishing of this report, without reimbursement, payment, contributions, or financial support from any outside source.
    [Show full text]