DOCSLIB.ORG

Trends in Selected Streamflow Statistics at 19 Long-Term Streamflow-Gaging Stations Indicative of Outflows from Texas to Arkansas, Louisiana, Galveston Bay, and the Gulf of Mexico, 1922

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trends in Selected Streamflow Statistics at 19 Long-Term Streamflow-Gaging Stations Indicative of Outflows from Texas to Arkansas, Louisiana, Galveston Bay, and the Gulf of Mexico, 1922 PreparedPrepared inin cooperationcooperation withwith thethe TexasTexas WaterWater DevelopmentDevelopment BoardBoard TrendsTrends inin SelectedSelected StreamflowStreamflow StatisticsStatistics atat 1919 Long-TermLong-Term Streamflow-GagingStreamflow-Gaging StationsStations IndicativeIndicative ofof OutflowsOutflows fromfrom TexasTexas toto Arkansas,Arkansas, Louisiana,Louisiana, GalvestonGalveston Bay,Bay, andand thethe GulfGulf ofof Mexico,Mexico, 1922–20091922–2009 Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5182 Revised September 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Background, Looking towards the right bank of the Sabine River during a flood measurement at stream- flow-gaging station 08030500 - Sabine River near Ruliff, Texas, on October 23, 2006. Photograph by Doug McGhee, U.S. Geological Survey. Front cover: Left, Discharge measurement at streamflow-gaging station 08117500 - San Bernard River near Boling, Texas. Photograph by Mac Cherry, U.S. Geological Survey on April 1, 2007. Right, Gage shelter raised above 200-year flood-plain level at 08114000 - Brazos River at Richmond, Texas, January 15, 2007. Photograph by Joe Stuart, U.S. Geological Survey. Back cover: Left, U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging station 08475000 - Rio Grande near Brownsville, Texas, August 18, 2010. Photograph by Jaimie Ingold, U.S. Geological Survey. Right, Gage shelter and wire-weight gage at 08041000 - Neches River near Evadale, Texas. Photograph by Joe Stuart, November 17, 2006. Trends in Selected Streamflow Statistics at 19 Long-Term Streamflow-Gaging Stations Indicative of Outflows from Texas to Arkansas, Louisiana, Galveston Bay, and the Gulf of Mexico, 1922–2009 By Dana L. Barbie and Loren L. Wehmeyer Prepared in cooperation with the Texas Water Development Board Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5182 Revised September 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 Revised 2012 This and other USGS information products are available at http://store.usgs.gov/ U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 To learn about the USGS and its information products visit http://www.usgs.gov/ 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Barbie, D.L., and Wehmeyer, L.L., 2012, Trends in selected streamflow statistics at 19 long-term streamflow-gaging stations indicative of outflows from Texas to Arkansas, Louisiana, Galveston Bay, and the Gulf of Mexico, 1922–2009: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5182, 20 p. (Revised September 2012) iii Contents Abstract ..........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................1 Description of Study Area ..................................................................................................................3 Previous Studies ..................................................................................................................................3 Methods ..........................................................................................................................................................3 Trends in Selected Streamflow Statistics .................................................................................................6 Outflows to Arkansas (Red and Sulphur River Basins) .................................................................6 Outflows to Louisiana (Little Cypress Creek Basin) .......................................................................8 Outflows to Upper Coast Gulf of Mexico (Sabine and Neches River Basins) ...........................8 Outflows to Gulf of Mexico through Galveston Bay (Trinity and San Jacinto Rivers and Associated Creeks and Bayous) ..........................................................................................9 Outflows to Middle Coast Gulf of Mexico (Brazos, San Bernard, and Colorado River Basins) .........................................................................................................................13 Outflows to Lower Coast Gulf of Mexico (Guadalupe and Nueces River Basins and Rio Grande Basin) ................................................................................................................16 Summary .......................................................................................................................................................19 References ...................................................................................................................................................20 Figures 1. Map showing basin boundaries for major rivers in Texas that outflow to Arkansas, Louisiana, Galveston Bay, and the Gulf of Mexico .................................................................2 2. Map showing statistically-significant trends in the annual mean daily discharge for the period of record through 2009 for streamflow-gaging stations with more than 50 years of record indicative of outflows from Texas ...................................................4 3. Graph showing annual mean daily discharge for the period of record through 2009 for U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging station 07337000 Red River at Index, Arkansas .......................................................................................................................................7 4. Graph showing annual mean daily discharge for the period of record through 2009 for U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging station 08041000 Neches River at Evadale, Texas .......................................................................................................................10 5. Graph showing annual mean daily discharge for the period of record through 2009 for U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging station 08066500 Trinity River at Romayor, Texas ..........................................................................................................................12 6. Graph showing annual mean daily discharge for the period of record through 2009 for U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging station 08073500 Buffalo Bayou near Addicks, Texas ............................................................................................................................14 7. Graph showing annual mean daily discharge for the period of record through 2009 for U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging station 08076000 Greens Bayou near Houston, Texas ..................................................................................................................15 8. Graph showing annual mean daily discharge for the period of record through 2009 for U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging station 08475000 Rio Grande at Brownsville, Texas .....................................................................................................................18 iv Tables 1. Selected U.S. Geological Survey or International Boundary and Water Commission streamflow-gaging stations with more than 50 years of record that were used to assess trends in outflows from Texas to Arkansas, Louisiana, and the Gulf of Mexico .......................................................................................................................5 2. Monotonic trends in outflows from the Red and Sulphur River Basins in Texas, 1937–2009 ......................................................................................................................................6 3. Monotonic trends in outflows from the Little Cypress Creek Basin in Texas, 1947–2009 ......................................................................................................................................8 4. Monotonic trends in outflows from the Sabine and Neches River Basins in Texas, 1925–2009 ......................................................................................................................................9 5. Monotonic trends in outflows from the Trinity and San Jacinto River Basins and associated creeks and bayous to Galveston Bay in Texas, 1925–2009 ............................11 6. Monotonic trends in outflows from the Brazos, San Bernard, and Colorado River Basins in Texas, 1923–2009 ......................................................................................................16 7. Monotonic trends in outflows from the Guadalupe and Nueces River Basins, and the Rio Grande Basin in Texas, 1926–2009 ............................................................................17 Conversion Factors Inch/Pound to SI Multiply By To obtain Length mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer (km) Area square mile (mi2) 2.590 square kilometer (km2) Flow rate cubic foot per second (ft3/s) 0.02832 cubic meter per second (m3/s) Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the North American
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Listing of Texas Ports
    TRANSPORTATION Policy Research CENTER Overview: Texas Ports and Navigation Districts The first Navigation District was established in 1909, and there are now 24 Navigation Districts statewide.1 Navigation districts generally provide for the construction and improvement of waterways in Texas for the purpose of navigation. The creation of navigation districts is authorized in two different articles of the Texas Constitution to serve different purposes. Section 52, Article III, authorizes counties, cities, and other political corporations or subdivisions to issue bonds and levy taxes for the purposes of improving rivers, bays, creeks, streams, and canals to prevent overflow, to provide irrigation, and to permit navigation. Section 59, Article XVI, authorizes the creation of conservation and reclamation districts for the purpose of conserving and developing natural resources, including the improvement, preservation, and conservation of inland and coastal water for navigation and controlling storm water and floodwater of rivers and streams in aid of navigation. This section authorizes conservation and reclamation districts to issue bonds and levy taxes for those purposes. Generally, however, navigation districts are structured, governed, and financed in the same manner. Chapters 60 through 63, Texas Water Code, set forth provisions relating to navigation districts. The purposes and functions of navigation districts are very similar, regardless of the Chapter of the Water Code under which they were created. More than one chapter of the Water Code may be applicable to the manner in which a given navigation district conducts its business. Chapter 61 (Article III, Section 52, Navigation Districts) authorizes the creation of districts to operate under Section 52, Article III, Texas Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Beach and Bay Access Guide
    Texas Beach & Bay Access Guide Second Edition Texas General Land Office Jerry Patterson, Commissioner The Texas Gulf Coast The Texas Gulf Coast consists of cordgrass marshes, which support a rich array of marine life and provide wintering grounds for birds, and scattered coastal tallgrass and mid-grass prairies. The annual rainfall for the Texas Coast ranges from 25 to 55 inches and supports morning glories, sea ox-eyes, and beach evening primroses. Click on a region of the Texas coast The Texas General Land Office makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information depicted on these maps, or the data from which it was produced. These maps are NOT suitable for navigational purposes and do not purport to depict or establish boundaries between private and public land. Contents I. Introduction 1 II. How to Use This Guide 3 III. Beach and Bay Public Access Sites A. Southeast Texas 7 (Jefferson and Orange Counties) 1. Map 2. Area information 3. Activities/Facilities B. Houston-Galveston (Brazoria, Chambers, Galveston, Harris, and Matagorda Counties) 21 1. Map 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities C. Golden Crescent (Calhoun, Jackson and Victoria Counties) 1. Map 79 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities D. Coastal Bend (Aransas, Kenedy, Kleberg, Nueces, Refugio and San Patricio Counties) 1. Map 96 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities E. Lower Rio Grande Valley (Cameron and Willacy Counties) 1. Map 2. Area Information 128 3. Activities/Facilities IV. National Wildlife Refuges V. Wildlife Management Areas VI. Chambers of Commerce and Visitor Centers 139 143 147 Introduction It’s no wonder that coastal communities are the most densely populated and fastest growing areas in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Equations for Estimation of Peak-Streamflow Frequency for Natural Basins in Texas
    REGIONAL EQUATIONS FOR ESTIMATION OF PEAK-STREAMFLOW FREQUENCY FOR NATURAL BASINS IN TEXAS U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96–4307 b QT = cA PEAK DISCHARGE FOR STREAMFLOW-GAGING STATION STREAMFLOW-GAGING FOR DISCHARGE PEAK CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA Prepared in cooperation with the TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGIONAL EQUATIONS FOR ESTIMATION OF PEAK-STREAMFLOW FREQUENCY FOR NATURAL BASINS IN TEXAS By William H. Asquith and Raymond M. Slade, Jr. U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96–4307 Prepared in cooperation with the TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Austin, Texas 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Acting Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 8011 Cameron Rd. Box 25286 Austin, TX 78754–3898 Denver, CO 80225–0286 ii CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Scope ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • U N S U U S E U R a C S
    WALLER MONTGOMERY Prairie S 6 2 1 t DISTRICT 8 H 3 MONTGOMERY 4 View w 6 y Tomball y Waller DISTRICT East Fork San w H Jacinto River t StLp 494 Dayton LEE Spring 8 S S China tH Pine Island w Liberty Ames y Nome 7 DISTRICT y S Devers 1 7 w t 3 H H 2 59 w S 1 y y 10 w t LIBERTY H H 9 2 Smithville t 5 4 w 1 S y Hempstead 9 Eastex y w Fwy 3 H 6 Hwy Atascocita DISTRICT S S S t H wy 159 DISTRICT t tH 9 Industry S 5 Lake Houston H 2 w 1 y 110th Congress of the United States w t y S Hw y w 7 tH y w Humble H y 1 w 15 t H 18 1 y 159 9 t on 4 4 S m u 6 JEFFERSON 0 a 3 e 1 y 71 Bellville B 6 w StHwy N y o w tH DISTRICT rt h H S we S t s t S Cedar Creek Reservoir t F Jersey L w p 10 y Village 8 Old River- 6 ( Crosby N Winfree y Aldine La Grange o w Fayetteville r H t t h S y B Hw e nt 4 StHwy 36 o r l eaum 2 WALLER t B e ) 1 v Sheldon i y Lake Charlotte Hw Lost R t Barrett S Lake y t C i e n 5 DISTRICT HARRIS d Mont a ri 9 r B Belvieu T y San Jacinto yu w 7 StHwy 73 H River t Beaumont S Hwy Cloverleaf 1 Winnie Pattison Hilshire 6 Highlands Lake Katy Village y Spring Cove Cotton Lake Anahuac w H StHwy 65 S Channelview t t Valley H S w San Hwy Jacinto Stowell BASTROP y Brookshire 7 1 Felipe Katy Blvd City Hedwig Village Hunters Old Alligator Sealy Fwy Creek River Bayou Anahuac Village Baytown CALDWELL Houston Piney Beach Bunker Hill e Scott Bay Point d Galena i 6 City Village Village West University s 4 Cinco y Park DISTRICT 1 a Dr Bessies Cr ) Place y AUSTIN Ranch y W w w H FAYETTE k 29 t P S Ma Columbus FM n adena Fwy CHAMBERS in o as S P Weimar FM
    [Show full text]
  • Bookletchart™ San Luis Pass to East Matagorda Bay NOAA Chart 11321
    BookletChart™ San Luis Pass to East Matagorda Bay NOAA Chart 11321 A reduced-scale NOAA nautical chart for small boaters When possible, use the full-size NOAA chart for navigation. Included Area Published by the old river channel is now a tidal estuary and the harbor is protected against flood conditions in the river. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Vessels should approach Freeport Harbor through the prescribed National Ocean Service Safety Fairways. (See 166.100 through 166.200, chapter 2.) Office of Coast Survey Anchorages.–Vessels should anchor off the entrance to Freeport Harbor in the Freeport Fairway Anchorage. (See 166.100 through 166.200, www.NauticalCharts.NOAA.gov chapter 2.) 888-990-NOAA Dangers.–About 6 miles SW of the entrance to Freeport Harbor, Brazos River has generated a shoal extending about 5 miles into the Gulf off the What are Nautical Charts? mouth of the river. This area is foul and should be given a wide berth. It is reported that several vessels have stranded in this vicinity and that Nautical charts are a fundamental tool of marine navigation. They show the depths are considerably less than charted. The bottom is soft mud, water depths, obstructions, buoys, other aids to navigation, and much indicating that silting from the river has occurred. more. The information is shown in a way that promotes safe and Oil drilling structures may be erected in the Gulf near the approach to efficient navigation. Chart carriage is mandatory on the commercial Freeport Harbor. Mariners should be on the lookout for these structures ships that carry America’s commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • San Bernard River Watershed Data Report April 2018
    San Bernard River Watershed Data Report April 2018 Table of Contents The preparation of this report was prepared in cooperation with, and financed through, grants from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Watershed Location and Physical Description ............................................................................................. 7 Location and Climate ................................................................................................................................ 7 Physical Description and Land Use .......................................................................................................... 7 Wildlife and Wildlife Refuges .................................................................................................................. 7 History ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 TMDL & Watershed Protection ................................................................................................................ 8 Water Quality Parameters ............................................................................................................................. 9 Water Temperature ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TPWD Strategic Planning Regions
    River Basins TPWD Brazos River Basin Brazos-Colorado Coastal Basin W o lf Cr eek Canadian River Basin R ita B l anca C r e e k e e ancar Cl ita B R Strategic Planning Colorado River Basin Colorado-Lavaca Coastal Basin Canadian River Cypress Creek Basin Regions Guadalupe River Basin Nor t h F o r k of the R e d R i ver XAmarillo Lavaca River Basin 10 Salt Fork of the Red River Lavaca-Guadalupe Coastal Basin Neches River Basin P r air i e Dog To w n F o r k of the R e d R i ver Neches-Trinity Coastal Basin ® Nueces River Basin Nor t h P e as e R i ve r Nueces-Rio Grande Coastal Basin Pease River Red River Basin White River Tongue River 6a Wi chita R iver W i chita R i ver Rio Grande River Basin Nor t h Wi chita R iver Little Wichita River South Wichita Ri ver Lubbock Trinity River Sabine River Basin X Nor t h Sulphur R i v e r Brazos River West Fork of the Trinity River San Antonio River Basin Brazos River Sulphur R i v e r South Sulphur River San Antonio-Nueces Coastal Basin 9 Clear Fork Tr Plano San Jacinto River Basin X Cypre ss Creek Garland FortWorth Irving X Sabine River in San Jacinto-Brazos Coastal Basin ity Rive X Clea r F o r k of the B r az os R i v e r XTr n X iityX RiverMesqu ite Sulphur River Basin r XX Dallas Arlington Grand Prai rie Sabine River Trinity River Basin XAbilene Paluxy River Leon River Trinity-San Jacinto Coastal Basin Chambers Creek Brazos River Attoyac Bayou XEl Paso R i c h land Cr ee k Colorado River 8 Pecan Bayou 5a Navasota River Neches River Waco Angelina River Concho River X Colorado River 7 Lampasas
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrologic, Water-Quality, and Biological Data for Three Water Bodies, Texas Gulf Coastal Plain, 2000-2002
    science for a changing world In cooperation with the Houston-Galveston Area Council and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Hydrologic, Water-Quality, and Biological Data for Three Water Bodies, Texas Gulf Coastal Plain, 2000-2002 Open-File Report 03-459 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic, Water-Quality, and Biological Data for Three Water Bodies, Texas Gulf Coastal Plain, 2000-2002 By Jeffery W. East and Jennifer L. Hogan U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 03-459 In cooperation with the Houston-Galveston Area Council and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Austin, Texas 2003 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 8027 Exchange Dr. Austin, TX 78754-4733 E-mail: [email protected] Copies of this report can be purchased from U.S. Geological Survey Information Services Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225-0286 E-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................................................................................^ 1 Introduction ....................................................................... 1 Purpose and Scope ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Summary Chart
    REGIONAL WATER 2017 QUALITY SUMMARY The numbers represent the percent of total segment length that is impaired or of concern for each parameter. Cells without numbers (blanks) represent stream segments that are currently meeting state standards but may be improving or degrading for each parameter. Basin Watershed Segment DO Bact Chlor Nut PCB Other* Frogs Trinity-San Cedar Bayou Tidal 0901 100 100 100 100 X Jacinto Coastal Cedar Bayou Above Tidal 0902 100 X X X X Buffalo Bayou Above Tidal 1014 11 78.3 70.2 2.3 X X X Buffalo Bayou Tidal 1013 37.4 86.8 54.1 32.7 X X Caney Creek 1010 16.8 59.6 X X X Cypress Creek 1009 28.7 77.7 77.7 11.7 X X X East Fork San Jacinto River 1003 63.7 X X X X Greens Bayou Above Tidal 1016 12 95.9 85.6 X X X Houston Ship Channel 1006 16 47.4 6.5 87.7 36.3 36.3 X X Houston Ship Channel Buffalo Bayou Tidal 1007 19 67.7 84.9 28.6 28.6 X X Houston Ship Channel/ San Jacinto River Tidal 1005 82.2 100 82.2 X X X X X X X San Jacinto Lake Conroe 1012 11 River Lake Creek 1015 70.8 12.1 30.7 X X X Lake Houston 1002 20.9 7 15 43.9 0.1 X X X X Peach Creek 1011 100 X X X San Jacinto River Tidal 1001 36.5 36.5 X X X Spring Creek 1008 47.8 72.9 1.2 23.6 8.9 X X X West Fork San Jacinto River 1004 57.7 25.8 X X X X White Oak Bayou Above Tidal 1017 11.7 87 83.2 X X Armand Bayou Tidal 1113 61.4 73.7 23.7 16.9 23.7 11.6 X X X Bastrop Bayou Tidal 1105 76.7 86.3 5.9 X X X Chocolate Bayou Above Tidal 1108 100 X X X Chocolate Bayou Tidal 1107 100 100 X Clear Creek Above Tidal 1102 53.3 82.5 72.2 49.4 13.4 X Clear Creek Tidal 1101 27.9
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Survey of a Portion of the Choke Canyon Reservoir Area in Mcmullen and Live Oak Counties, Texas
    Volume 1981 Article 21 1981 An Archaeological Survey of a Portion of the Choke Canyon Reservoir Area in McMullen and Live Oak Counties, Texas Alston V. Thoms Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, [email protected] John L. Montgomery Center for Archaeological Research Alice W. Portnoy Center for Archaeological Research Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Thoms, Alston V.; Montgomery, John L.; and Portnoy, Alice W. (1981) "An Archaeological Survey of a Portion of the Choke Canyon Reservoir Area in McMullen and Live Oak Counties, Texas," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 1981, Article 21. https://doi.org/ 10.21112/ita.1981.1.21 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol1981/iss1/21 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Archaeological Survey of a Portion of the Choke Canyon Reservoir Area in McMullen and Live Oak Counties, Texas Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol1981/iss1/21 l r'--../ I, , I i' / AN ARCH'AEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF A PORTION OF THE I.
    [Show full text]
  • 1991 HDR-Etal Region
    Regional Water Supply Planning Study - Phase I Nueces River Basin Volume II - - --- / ------ --- / Technical Report ---- / / I I / I I / I i I I I I I I Nueces River I Authority CHOKE CANYON City of RESERVOIR Corpus Christi Edwards Underground Water District South Texas Water Authority NUECES Texas Water ESTUARY Development Board HOR Engineering, Inc. r r REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY PLANNING STUDY r NUECES RIVER BASIN r r VOLUME II ·TECHNICAL REPORT r r Prepared for r Nueces River Authority City of Corpus Christi Edwards Underground Water District r South Texas Water Authority r Texas Water Development Board r r by r HDR Engineering, Inc. and r Geraghty & Miller, Inc. r r May, 1991 r (_ IDWARDS UNDERGROUND WATER r DlSTRlCT LIBRARY r r r Advisory Committee Participants r for Regional Water Supply Planning Study r Nueces River Basin r Nueces River Authority r •con Mims City of Corpus Christi r Victor Medina Jim Riley r Paul Werner Edwards Underground Water District r Russell Masters Greg Rothe r South Texas Water Authority Tom Brown r\... r Texas Water Development Board Gordon Thom rt HOR Engineering. Inc. Kenneth Choffel r Herb Grubb James K. (Ken) Haney r Samuel Kent Vaugh r r *Committee Coordinator ~ \ l r r VOLUME II - TECHNICAL REPORT r TABLE OF CONTENTS r SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTR.ODUCTION .... , . • . • • . • . • 1-1 1.1 Description of Nueces River Basin • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1-3 r 1.2 Previous Hydrologic and Water Supply Studies • • • • • • • • • 1-4 1.3 Other Considerations of Recharge Enhancement • ·••••••• 1-5 r 1.4 Study Objectives • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1-6 2.0 WATER USE AND WATER RIGHTS · • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2-1 2.1 Historical Surface Water Use • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2-1 r 2.2 Water Rights .
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Biological Control of Invasive
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States Roy Van Driesche Bernd Blossey Mark Hoddle Suzanne Lyon Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2002-04 Department of Service August 2002 Agriculture BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES Technical Coordinators Roy Van Driesche and Suzanne Lyon Department of Entomology, University of Massachusets, Amherst, MA Bernd Blossey Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Mark Hoddle Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, USDA, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the authors of the individual chap- We would also like to thank the U.S. Depart- ters for their expertise in reviewing and summariz- ment of Agriculture–Forest Service, Forest Health ing the literature and providing current information Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West on biological control of the major invasive plants in Virginia, for providing funding for the preparation the Eastern United States. and printing of this publication. G. Keith Douce, David Moorhead, and Charles Additional copies of this publication can be or- Bargeron of the Bugwood Network, University of dered from the Bulletin Distribution Center, Uni- Georgia (Tifton, Ga.), managed and digitized the pho- versity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, (413) tographs and illustrations used in this publication and 545-2717; or Mark Hoddle, Department of Entomol- produced the CD-ROM accompanying this book.
    [Show full text]