DOCSLIB.ORG

Globefish Research Programme. Volume 81

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Globefish Research Programme. Volume 81 GLOBEFISH RESEARCH PROGRAMME Trends in European Groundfish Markets Trends in European Volume 81 Groundfish Markets Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Fishery Industries Division Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy Tel.:+39 06 5705 5074 Fax: +39 06 5705 5188 www.globefish.org Volume 81 Trends in European Groundfish Markets by Kristin Lien GLOBEFISH (September 2005) The GLOBEFISH Research Programme is an activity initiated by FAO's Fishery Industries Division, Rome, Italy and financed jointly by: - NMFS, (National Marine Fisheries Service), Washington, DC, USA - FROM, (Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación), Madrid, Spain - Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Copenhagen, Denmark - European Commission, Directorate General for Fisheries, Brussels, Belgium - NSEC, (Norwegian Seafood Export Council), Tromsoe, Norway - OFIMER, (Office National Interprofessionnel des Produits de la Mer et de l’Aquaculture), Paris, France - SHILAT, (Iranian Fisheries Organization),Tehran, Iran - VASEP, (Viet Nam Association of Seafood Exporters and Producers), Hanoi,Viet Nam - ASMI, (Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute), Juneau, USA Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, GLOBEFISH, Fishery Industries Division Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy – Tel.: (39) 06570 56244/06570 54759 – E-mail: [email protected] - Fax: (39) 0657055188 Web:www.globefish.org 1 The designation employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Photograph courtesy of Norwegian Seafood Export Council, NSEC Trends in European Groundfish Market FAO GLOBEFISH Research Programme, Vol.81 . Rome, FAO. 2005. p153 This study describes supply and demand for fresh and frozen groundfish products in Europe. It mainly focuses on the 15 countries that were members of the European Union before 2004 (EU15). Seven species have been chosen for the study, namely cod, pollock/Alaska pollock, saithe, haddock, redfish, hake and hoki, and the term “seven groundfish” is used to cover these species. The study describes each species and the groundfish in each EU15 country, and looks at market developments and consumption trends over the last decade. The aim is to give the reader an understanding of groundfish market dynamics and a feel for potential business within the EU15 market. The main countries supplying groundfish to the EU15 market are also discussed in this report All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Information Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy. © FAO 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Summary................................................................................................................................................................ 5 1. Overview .......................................................................................................................................................... 13 2. EU15 Demand and Catches............................................................................................................................ 21 2.1. Cod............................................................................................................................................................ 21 2.2. Alaska Pollock/Pollock.............................................................................................................................. 30 2.2.1. EU15 Import of Surimi...................................................................................................................... 36 2.3. Hake .......................................................................................................................................................... 40 2.4. Hoki........................................................................................................................................................... 47 2.5. Haddock .................................................................................................................................................... 50 2.6. Saithe......................................................................................................................................................... 55 2.7. Redfish....................................................................................................................................................... 59 2.8. Price Comparisons.................................................................................................................................... 63 3. Trends in the EU15 Countries Trade ............................................................................................................ 65 3.1. United Kingdom – the Main Cod and Haddock Importer ......................................................................... 66 3.2. Spain - the Largest Hake Importer............................................................................................................ 70 3.3. Germany – Biggest Alaska Pollock Market............................................................................................... 72 3.4. France – a Market for many Species......................................................................................................... 77 3.5. Denmark – a Processor of Groundfish...................................................................................................... 80 3.6. The Netherlands – a Trader in Groundfish ............................................................................................... 84 3.7. Portugal – Whole Frozen Orientation....................................................................................................... 85 3.8. Italy – Strong Hake Focus......................................................................................................................... 88 3.9. Belgium /Luxemburg – Fresh Fillets Focus .............................................................................................. 90 3.10. Sweden – Low Import for Consumption .................................................................................................. 91 3.11. Ireland – a Small but Increasing Groundfish Importer........................................................................... 91 3.12. Greece – Decreasing Groundfish Imports............................................................................................... 92 3.13. Austria – Imports only Fillets.................................................................................................................. 93 3.14. Finland – Mainly Frozen Saithe Fillets................................................................................................... 93 4. Most Important Suppliers to EU15 ............................................................................................................... 95 4.1. Iceland – Largest Exporter to EU15 in 2004 ............................................................................................ 95 4.2. Norway – Worlds Largest Seafood Exporter........................................................................................... 106 4.3. Faroe Islands – the Saithe Country......................................................................................................... 114 4.4. China – Growing Fast............................................................................................................................. 120 4.5. USA - the New Alaska Pollock Supplier................................................................................................. 125 4.6. Russia – Less Important for EU15 .......................................................................................................... 131 4.7. Namibia – the Largest Hake Supplier ..................................................................................................... 134 4.8. South Africa – an Important Hake Supplier ............................................................................................ 135 3 4.9. Argentina – Frozen Hake Supplier.......................................................................................................... 136 4.10. Chile – Fresh/Chilled Hake Supplier .................................................................................................... 138 4.11. Uruguay – Mostly Frozen Hake Fillets ................................................................................................. 141 4.12. New Zealand – Largest Hoki Supplier .................................................................................................. 143 4.13. Poland – a Frozen Cod Fillet Supplier ................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hairtail and Frostfish (Trichiuridae) Exploitation Status Undefined
    I & I NSW WILD FISHERIES RESEARCH PROGRAM Hairtail and Frostfish (Trichiuridae) EXPLOITATION STATUS UNDEFINED No local biological information available for either species in this group, but growth and maturity have been studied for Trichiurus lepturus from the East China Sea, where it supports a major fishery. SCIENTIFIC NAME STANDARD NAME COMMENT Trichiurus lepturus largehead hairtail Lepidopus caudatus frostfish Trichiurus lepturus Image © Bernard Yau Background The hairtail is commonly around 100 cm in length and about 2 kg in weight but reaches a The largehead hairtail (Trichiurus lepturus) maximum length of about 220 cm and weight belongs to the family Trichiuridae which, of 3.5 kg. worldwide, includes nine genera and about 30 species generally referred to as cutlassfishes or Overseas studies have observed that adults scabbardfishes. Off NSW, at least four species feed at the surface during the day, and retreat of trichiurids are found in deepwater, but the to deeper waters at night. In contrast, juveniles most well known member of the family to most and small adults tend to feed at night at the people is the hairtail, found in shallow coastal surface, and aggregate into schools at depths waters and estuaries. during the day. The adult hairtail diet consists mainly of fish with occasional squid and A cosmopolitan species, the largehead hairtail crustaceans, whereas juveniles mainly feed on is subject to significant fisheries off many planktonic crustaceans, euphausiids and small Asian countries, particularly China and Korea. fish. The world catch reportedly now exceeds 1.5 million t annually. In eastern Australia, Reported landings in NSW generally range hairtail occasionally school in coastal bays between 10 and 25 t with catches greatest and estuaries where they may be targeted during March-May.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of Terengganu East Coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia Ii Iii
    i Fishes of Terengganu East coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia ii iii Edited by Mizuki Matsunuma, Hiroyuki Motomura, Keiichi Matsuura, Noor Azhar M. Shazili and Mohd Azmi Ambak Photographed by Masatoshi Meguro and Mizuki Matsunuma iv Copy Right © 2011 by the National Museum of Nature and Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu and Kagoshima University Museum All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the publisher. Copyrights of the specimen photographs are held by the Kagoshima Uni- versity Museum. For bibliographic purposes this book should be cited as follows: Matsunuma, M., H. Motomura, K. Matsuura, N. A. M. Shazili and M. A. Ambak (eds.). 2011 (Nov.). Fishes of Terengganu – east coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia. National Museum of Nature and Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu and Kagoshima University Museum, ix + 251 pages. ISBN 978-4-87803-036-9 Corresponding editor: Hiroyuki Motomura (e-mail: [email protected]) v Preface Tropical seas in Southeast Asian countries are well known for their rich fish diversity found in various environments such as beautiful coral reefs, mud flats, sandy beaches, mangroves, and estuaries around river mouths. The South China Sea is a major water body containing a large and diverse fish fauna. However, many areas of the South China Sea, particularly in Malaysia and Vietnam, have been poorly studied in terms of fish taxonomy and diversity. Local fish scientists and students have frequently faced difficulty when try- ing to identify fishes in their home countries. During the International Training Program of the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (ITP of JSPS), two graduate students of Kagoshima University, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish in Disguise: Seafood Fraud in Korea
    Fish in disguise: Seafood fraud in Korea A briefing by the Environmental Justice Foundation 1 Executive summary Between January and December 2018, the Environmental Justice Foundation (EJF) used DNA testing to determine levels of seafood fraud in the Republic of Korea. The results showed that over a third of samples tested were mislabelled. This mislabelling defrauds consumers, risks public health, harms the marine environment and can be associated with serious human rights abuses across the world. These findings demonstrate the urgent need for greater transparency and traceability in Korean seafood, including imported products. Key findings: • Over a third of seafood samples (34.8%, 105 of 302 samples) genetically analysed were mislabelled. • Samples labelled Fleshy Prawn, Fenneropenaeus chinensis (100%), Japanese Eel, Anguilla japonica (67.7%), Mottled Skate, Raja pulchra (53.3%) and Common Octopus, Octopus vulgaris (52.9%) had the highest rates of mislabelling. • Not a single sample labelled Fleshly Prawn was the correct species. • Mislabelling was higher in restaurants, fish markets and online than in general markets or superstores. • By processed types, sushi (53.9%), fresh fish (38.9%) and sashimi (33.6%) were the most likely to be mislabelled. • The seafood fraud identified by this research has direct negative impacts for consumers. It is clear that for some species sampled consumers were likely to be paying more than they should. For example, more than half of the eel and skate samples that were labelled domestic were actually found to be imported, which can cost only half of the price of domestic products. Swordfish mislabelled as Bluefin Tuna can be sold for four to five times as much.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIAL PUBLICATION 6 the Effects of Marine Debris Caused by the Great Japan Tsunami of 2011
    PICES SPECIAL PUBLICATION 6 The Effects of Marine Debris Caused by the Great Japan Tsunami of 2011 Editors: Cathryn Clarke Murray, Thomas W. Therriault, Hideaki Maki, and Nancy Wallace Authors: Stephen Ambagis, Rebecca Barnard, Alexander Bychkov, Deborah A. Carlton, James T. Carlton, Miguel Castrence, Andrew Chang, John W. Chapman, Anne Chung, Kristine Davidson, Ruth DiMaria, Jonathan B. Geller, Reva Gillman, Jan Hafner, Gayle I. Hansen, Takeaki Hanyuda, Stacey Havard, Hirofumi Hinata, Vanessa Hodes, Atsuhiko Isobe, Shin’ichiro Kako, Masafumi Kamachi, Tomoya Kataoka, Hisatsugu Kato, Hiroshi Kawai, Erica Keppel, Kristen Larson, Lauran Liggan, Sandra Lindstrom, Sherry Lippiatt, Katrina Lohan, Amy MacFadyen, Hideaki Maki, Michelle Marraffini, Nikolai Maximenko, Megan I. McCuller, Amber Meadows, Jessica A. Miller, Kirsten Moy, Cathryn Clarke Murray, Brian Neilson, Jocelyn C. Nelson, Katherine Newcomer, Michio Otani, Gregory M. Ruiz, Danielle Scriven, Brian P. Steves, Thomas W. Therriault, Brianna Tracy, Nancy C. Treneman, Nancy Wallace, and Taichi Yonezawa. Technical Editor: Rosalie Rutka Please cite this publication as: The views expressed in this volume are those of the participating scientists. Contributions were edited for Clarke Murray, C., Therriault, T.W., Maki, H., and Wallace, N. brevity, relevance, language, and style and any errors that [Eds.] 2019. The Effects of Marine Debris Caused by the were introduced were done so inadvertently. Great Japan Tsunami of 2011, PICES Special Publication 6, 278 pp. Published by: Project Designer: North Pacific Marine Science Organization (PICES) Lori Waters, Waters Biomedical Communications c/o Institute of Ocean Sciences Victoria, BC, Canada P.O. Box 6000, Sidney, BC, Canada V8L 4B2 Feedback: www.pices.int Comments on this volume are welcome and can be sent This publication is based on a report submitted to the via email to: [email protected] Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan, in June 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • ILLEGAL FISHING Which Fish Species Are at Highest Risk from Illegal and Unreported Fishing?
    ILLEGAL FISHING Which fish species are at highest risk from illegal and unreported fishing? October 2015 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 4 METHODOLOGY 5 OVERALL FINDINGS 9 NOTES ON ESTIMATES OF IUU FISHING 13 Tunas 13 Sharks 14 The Mediterranean 14 US Imports 15 CONCLUSION 16 CITATIONS 17 OCEAN BASIN PROFILES APPENDIX 1: IUU Estimates for Species Groups and Ocean Regions APPENDIX 2: Estimates of IUU Risk for FAO Assessed Stocks APPENDIX 3: FAO Ocean Area Boundary Descriptions APPENDIX 4: 2014 U.S. Edible Imports of Wild-Caught Products APPENDIX 5: Overexploited Stocks Categorized as High Risk – U.S. Imported Products Possibly Derived from Stocks EXECUTIVE SUMMARY New analysis by World Wildlife Fund (WWF) finds that over 85 percent of global fish stocks can be considered at significant risk of Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing. This evaluation is based on the most recent comprehensive estimates of IUU fishing and includes the worlds’ major commercial stocks or species groups, such as all those that are regularly assessed by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Based on WWF’s findings, the majority of the stocks, 54 percent, are categorized as at high risk of IUU, with an additional 32 perent judged to be at moderate risk. Of the 567 stocks that were assessed, the findings show that 485 stocks fall into these two categories. More than half of the world’s most overexploited stocks are at the highest risk of IUU fishing. Examining IUU risk by location, the WWF analysis shows that in more than one-third of the world’s ocean basins as designated by the FAO, all of these stocks were at high or moderate risk of IUU fishing.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Chapter 3.1.2: Longline Authors
    3.1.2 LONGLINE CHAPTER 3.1.2: AUTHORS: LAST UPDATE: LONGLINE Domingo A., Forselledo R., Miller March 2014 P., Jiménez S., Mas F. and Pons M. 3.1.2 General description of longline fisheries 1. General description of longline gear and vessels Longline is a fishing gear that is comprised of a main line, with secondary lines attached and hooks placed on the end of them. Longline is a very old gear, derived from “volantín” or “three hook line”, which was used by the Phoenicians and the Egyptians in the Mediterranean Sea (Canterla, 1989). The word “longline” is possibly of Catalonian origin, and derived from southern Italian or Greece (Prat Sabater, 2006; González García, 2008). Since their beginnings and up to the 15th century at least, the longlines that were used were fixed, anchored to the coast with stalks. Later, in the open sea, “jeito” and “vareque” net gears were used which drifted while remaining moored to the vessels, and which could have given rise to drift gears, one of which is longline (Canterla, 1989). 1.a General description of pelagic longline 1.a.1 Introduction Drifting pelagic longline is used worldwide to catch widely distributed pelagic and semi-pelagic fish. This gear is very effective in catching tunas, billfish and sharks, among others (Doumenge, 1998; Matsuda, 1998). It consists of a main line or “mother” line, suspended in the water by secondary lines called float lines, which carry the floats. The branch lines hang from the main line and carry hooks on the ends. The characteristics of the materials, dimensions, types of floats and hooks, as well as the configuration of the lines are quite variable, depending mainly on the origin of the fleets, the fishermen and the target species.
    [Show full text]
  • Intrinsic Vulnerability in the Global Fish Catch
    The following appendix accompanies the article Intrinsic vulnerability in the global fish catch William W. L. Cheung1,*, Reg Watson1, Telmo Morato1,2, Tony J. Pitcher1, Daniel Pauly1 1Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia, Aquatic Ecosystems Research Laboratory (AERL), 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada 2Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, 9901-862 Horta, Portugal *Email: [email protected] Marine Ecology Progress Series 333:1–12 (2007) Appendix 1. Intrinsic vulnerability index of fish taxa represented in the global catch, based on the Sea Around Us database (www.seaaroundus.org) Taxonomic Intrinsic level Taxon Common name vulnerability Family Pristidae Sawfishes 88 Squatinidae Angel sharks 80 Anarhichadidae Wolffishes 78 Carcharhinidae Requiem sharks 77 Sphyrnidae Hammerhead, bonnethead, scoophead shark 77 Macrouridae Grenadiers or rattails 75 Rajidae Skates 72 Alepocephalidae Slickheads 71 Lophiidae Goosefishes 70 Torpedinidae Electric rays 68 Belonidae Needlefishes 67 Emmelichthyidae Rovers 66 Nototheniidae Cod icefishes 65 Ophidiidae Cusk-eels 65 Trachichthyidae Slimeheads 64 Channichthyidae Crocodile icefishes 63 Myliobatidae Eagle and manta rays 63 Squalidae Dogfish sharks 62 Congridae Conger and garden eels 60 Serranidae Sea basses: groupers and fairy basslets 60 Exocoetidae Flyingfishes 59 Malacanthidae Tilefishes 58 Scorpaenidae Scorpionfishes or rockfishes 58 Polynemidae Threadfins 56 Triakidae Houndsharks 56 Istiophoridae Billfishes 55 Petromyzontidae
    [Show full text]
  • Field Identification Guide to the Living Marine Resources in Kenya
    Guide to Orders and Families 81 lateral line scales above scales before dorsal fin outer margin smooth outer margin toothed (predorsal scales) lateral–line 114 scales cycloid ctenoidِّ scales circumpeduncular Schematic examples lateral line of typical scales scales below Common scale counts adipose fin finlets soft rays (segmented, spinyunbranched) rays or spines usually branched) (unsegmented, always Example of a continuous Accessory dorsal and anal dorsal fin of a spiny–rayed fish fins: adipose fin and finlets rounded truncate emarginate lunate side front side front from the dorsal and pointed and separated forked pointed soft rays (branched, spines (solid) segments, 2 halves) anal fins Construction Most common types of fin rays of caudal fins 82 Bony Fishes GUIDE TO ORDERS AND FAMILIES Order ELOPIFORMES – Tarpons and allies Fin spines absent; a single dorsal fin located above middle of body; pelvic fins in abdominal position; lateral line present; 23–25 branchiostegal rays; upper jaw extending past eye; tip of snout not overhanging mouth; colour silvery. ELOPIDAE Page 121 very small scales Ladyfishes To 90 cm. Coastal marine waters and estuaries; pelagic. A single species included in the Guide to Species.underside of head large mouth gular plate MEGALOPIDAE Page 121 last ray long Tarpons large scales To 55 cm. Coastal marine waters and estuaries; pelagic. A single species included in the Guide to Species.underside of head gular plate Order ALBULIFORMES – Bonefishes Fin spines absent; a single dorsal fin located above middle of body; pelvic fins in abdominal position; lateral line present; 6–16 branchiostegal rays; upper jaw not extending as far as front of eye; tip of snout overhanging mouth; colour silvery.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved List of Japanese Fishery Fbos for Export to Vietnam Updated: 11/6/2021
    Approved list of Japanese fishery FBOs for export to Vietnam Updated: 11/6/2021 Business Approval No Address Type of products Name number FROZEN CHUM SALMON DRESSED (Oncorhynchus keta) FROZEN DOLPHINFISH DRESSED (Coryphaena hippurus) FROZEN JAPANESE SARDINE ROUND (Sardinops melanostictus) FROZEN ALASKA POLLACK DRESSED (Theragra chalcogramma) 420, Misaki-cho, FROZEN ALASKA POLLACK ROUND Kaneshin Rausu-cho, (Theragra chalcogramma) 1. Tsuyama CO., VN01870001 Menashi-gun, FROZEN PACIFIC COD DRESSED LTD Hokkaido, Japan (Gadus macrocephalus) FROZEN PACIFIC COD ROUND (Gadus macrocephalus) FROZEN DOLPHIN FISH ROUND (Coryphaena hippurus) FROZEN ARABESQUE GREENLING ROUND (Pleurogrammus azonus) FROZEN PINK SALMON DRESSED (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) - Fresh fish (excluding fish by-product) Maekawa Hokkaido Nemuro - Fresh bivalve mollusk. 2. Shouten Co., VN01860002 City Nishihamacho - Frozen fish (excluding fish by-product) Ltd 10-177 - Frozen processed bivalve mollusk Frozen Chum Salmon (round, dressed, semi- dressed,fillet,head,bone,skin) Frozen Alaska Pollack(round,dressed,semi- TAIYO 1-35-1 dressed,fillet) SANGYO CO., SHOWACHUO, Frozen Pacific Cod(round,dressed,semi- 3. LTD. VN01840003 KUSHIRO-CITY, dressed,fillet) KUSHIRO HOKKAIDO, Frozen Pacific Saury(round,dressed,semi- FACTORY JAPAN dressed) Frozen Chub Mackerel(round,fillet) Frozen Blue Mackerel(round,fillet) Frozen Salted Pollack Roe TAIYO 3-9 KOMABA- SANGYO CO., CHO, NEMURO- - Frozen fish 4. LTD. VN01860004 CITY, - Frozen processed fish NEMURO HOKKAIDO, (excluding by-product) FACTORY JAPAN
    [Show full text]
  • Red List of Bangladesh 2015
    Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary Chief National Technical Expert Mohammad Ali Reza Khan Technical Coordinator Mohammad Shahad Mahabub Chowdhury IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature Bangladesh Country Office 2015 i The designation of geographical entitles in this book and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature concerning the legal status of any country, territory, administration, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The biodiversity database and views expressed in this publication are not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, Bangladesh Forest Department and The World Bank. This publication has been made possible because of the funding received from The World Bank through Bangladesh Forest Department to implement the subproject entitled ‘Updating Species Red List of Bangladesh’ under the ‘Strengthening Regional Cooperation for Wildlife Protection (SRCWP)’ Project. Published by: IUCN Bangladesh Country Office Copyright: © 2015 Bangladesh Forest Department and IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holders, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holders. Citation: Of this volume IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+122. ISBN: 978-984-34-0733-7 Publication Assistant: Sheikh Asaduzzaman Design and Printed by: Progressive Printers Pvt.
    [Show full text]
  • 09 Kwok FISH 98(4)
    748 Abstract—Age and growth of two spe- Age and growth of cutlassfi shes, Trichiurus spp., cies of cutlassfi shes, Trichiurus spp. (Trichiuridae), from the South China from the South China Sea Sea were examined. Between December 1996 and November 1997, 1495 speci- mens were collected from coastal waters Kai Yin Kwok near Hong Kong. Two species, Trichi- I-Hsun Ni urus lepturus and T. nanhaiensis, were Department of Biology harvested and ages of specimens were Hong Kong University of Science & Technology estimated by using transverse sections Hong Kong SAR, China of the sagittal otoliths. Opaque growth E-mail address (for I-H Ni, contact author): [email protected] rings were verifi ed to have formed annually during February. Lee’s phe- nomenon was not observed for either species, although T. lepturus tended to display reverse Lee’s phenomenon. Oto- lith weight was linearly related to age, The cutlassfi sh, Trichiurus lepturus China Sea suffer from overfi shing (Lin, and accounted for about 72% and 76% Linnaeus 1758, occurs throughout trop- 1985; Du et al., 1988; Ma and Xu, 1989; of the variation in age (t) for T. lepturus and T. nanhaiensis, respectively, com- ical and temperate waters of the world, Luo, 1991; Ye and Rosenberg, 1991; Xu parable to the von Bertalanffy growth between latitude 60°N and 45°S (Froese et al., 1994). It is harvested only in the models in preanal length (PL). For older and Pauly, 1997). World harvests are Bo Hai and the Yellow Sea as bycatch fi sh, otolith weight provided a more pre- approximately 750,000 tonnes annually in other fi sheries (Lin, 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • Yellow Sea East China Sea
    Yellow Sea East China Sea [59] 86587_p059_078.indd 59 1/19/05 9:18:41 PM highlights ■ The Yellow Sea / East China Sea show strong infl uence of various human activities such as fi shing, mariculture, waste discharge, dumping, and habitat destruction. ■ There is strong evidence of a gradual long-term increase in the sea surface temperature since the early 1900s. ■ Given the variety of forcing factors, complicated changes in the ecosystem are anticipated. ■ Rapid change and large fl uctuations in species composition and abundance in the major fi shery have occurred. Ocean and Climate Changes [60] 86587_p059_078.indd 60 1/19/05 9:18:48 PM background The Yellow Sea and East China Sea are epi-continental seas bounded by the Korean Peninsula, mainland China, Taiwan, and the Japanese islands of Ryukyu and Kyushu. The shelf region shallower than 200m occupies more The coasts of the Yellow Sea have diverse habitats due than 70% of the entire Yellow Sea and the East China Sea. to jagged coastlines and the many islands scattered The Yellow Sea is a shallow basin with a mean depth around the shallow sea. Intertidal fl at is the most of 44 m. Its area is about 404,000 km2 if the Bohai signifi cant coastal habitat. The tidal fl at in the Yellow Sea in the north is excluded. A trough with a maximum Sea consists of several different types such as mudfl at depth of 103 m lies in the center. Water exchange is with salt marsh, sand fl at with gravel beach, sand dune slow and residence time is estimated to be 5-6 years.37 or eelgrass bed, and mixed fl at.
    [Show full text]