DOCSLIB.ORG

Chrysemys Picta Bellii, Western Painted Turtle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chrysemys Picta Bellii, Western Painted Turtle Conservation Assessment For The Western Painted Turtle In Oregon (Chrysemys picta bellii) Version 1.1 September 2009 Sponsored by: U.S.D.I. Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service U.S.D.A. Forest Service Region 6 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife City of Portland Metro _________________ Jennifer Gervais and Daniel Rosenberg Oregon Wildlife Institute Susan Barnes Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Claire Puchy City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services Science, Fish and Wildlife Program Elaine Stewart Metro Jennifer Gervais and Daniel Rosenberg are Ecologists with the Oregon Wildlife Institute, and faculty members in the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University. Susan Barnes is the Northwest Region Wildlife Diversity Biologist with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Claire Puchy is the Terrestrial Ecology Enhancement Strategy Program Coordinator, Bureau of Environmental Services, City of Portland Elaine Stewart is a Senior Natural Resources Scientist with Metro Table of Contents DATA DISCLAIMER.............................................................................................4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................5 I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................8 Goal................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Scope.............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Management Status...................................................................................................................................... 9 II. CLASSIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION..........................................................9 Systematics.................................................................................................................................................... 9 Species Description..................................................................................................................................... 10 Comparison with sympatric turtles— ...................................................................................................... 10 III. BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY...........................................................................12 Habitat......................................................................................................................................................... 12 Aquatic .................................................................................................................................................... 12 Basking.................................................................................................................................................... 13 Terrestrial................................................................................................................................................. 13 Diet............................................................................................................................................................... 14 Movements .................................................................................................................................................. 14 Aquatic movements ................................................................................................................................. 15 Terrestrial movements ............................................................................................................................. 15 Strength of inference and gaps in understanding..................................................................................... 16 Breeding Biology......................................................................................................................................... 17 Demography................................................................................................................................................ 19 Reproductive output................................................................................................................................. 19 Survival and recruitment.......................................................................................................................... 21 Population structure................................................................................................................................. 22 Population Modeling .................................................................................................................................. 24 1 IV. RANGE, DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND POPULATION TRENDS ...26 Range and Distribution.............................................................................................................................. 26 Surveys Conducted..................................................................................................................................... 27 Eastern Oregon and the Columbia Gorge ................................................................................................ 29 Western Oregon....................................................................................................................................... 29 Population Trends ...................................................................................................................................... 31 V. CONSERVATION...........................................................................................33 Threats......................................................................................................................................................... 33 Reduced Nest Site Availability................................................................................................................ 33 Elevated Nest and Hatchling Predation ................................................................................................... 33 Road Mortality......................................................................................................................................... 34 Introductions and Collection.................................................................................................................... 34 Recreation Disturbance............................................................................................................................ 35 Other Threats ........................................................................................................................................... 36 Conservation Status.................................................................................................................................... 38 Known Management Approaches............................................................................................................. 38 Management Considerations..................................................................................................................... 39 Reduced Nest Site Availability................................................................................................................ 39 Elevated Nest and Hatchling Predation ................................................................................................... 39 Road Mortality......................................................................................................................................... 39 Introductions and Collection.................................................................................................................... 40 Recreation Disturbance............................................................................................................................ 40 Other Threats ........................................................................................................................................... 40 VI. INVENTORY, MONITORING, AND RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES ...........42 Data and Information Gaps....................................................................................................................... 42 Inventory and Monitoring ......................................................................................................................... 42 Research Priorities ..................................................................................................................................... 43 VII. CASE STUDIES ...........................................................................................45 VIII. DEFINITIONS.............................................................................................49 IX. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................49 X. REFERENCES...............................................................................................50 2 XI. FIGURES .....................................................................................................56 Figure 1. Distribution of painted turtle observations among ecoregions in Oregon............................ 56 Figure 2. Distribution of painted turtle observations among public and private lands in Oregon. ... 57 Figure 3. Distribution of western painted turtle observations in the primary cluster of records in Oregon........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Western Painted Turtle (Chrysemys Picta)
    Western Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta) Class: Reptilia Order: Testudines Family: Emydidae Characteristics: The most widespread native turtle of North America. It lives in slow-moving fresh waters, from southern Canada to Louisiana and northern Mexico, and from the Atlantic to the Pacific. The adult painted turtle female is 10–25 cm (4–10 in) long; the male is smaller. The turtle's top shell is dark and smooth, without a ridge. Its skin is olive to black with red, orange, or yellow stripes on its extremities. The subspecies can be distinguished by their shells: the eastern has straight-aligned top shell segments; the midland has a large gray mark on the bottom shell; the southern has a red line on the top shell; the western has a red pattern on the bottom shell (Washington Nature Mapping Program). Behavior: Although they are frequently consumed as eggs or hatchlings by rodents, canines, and snakes, the adult turtles' hard shells protect them from most predators. Reliant on warmth from its surroundings, the painted turtle is active only during the day when it basks for hours on logs or rocks. During winter, the turtle hibernates, usually in the mud at the bottom of water bodies. Reproduction: The turtles mate in spring and autumn. Females dig nests on land and lay eggs between late spring and mid- summer. Hatched turtles grow until sexual maturity: 2–9 years for males, 6–16 for females. Diet: Wild: aquatic vegetation, algae, and small water creatures including insects, crustaceans, and fish Zoo: Algae, duck food Conservation: While habitat loss and road killings have reduced the turtle's population, its ability to live in human-disturbed settings has helped it remain the most abundant turtle in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Aquatic Turtle Care
    Mississippi Map Turtle Introduction to Aquatic Turtle Care There are over 300 turtle species worldwide, including roughly 60 types of tortoise and 7 sea turtle species. Turtles are found on every Basking area: aquatic turtles need sufficient continent except Antarctica, living in a variety room to leave the water, dry their shells, of climates from the tropical regions of Cen- and regulate their temperature. tral and South America through the temper- Incandescent light fixture heats the ate parts of the U.S., with a few species in o- o) basking area (typically 85 95 to UVB light fixture for illumination; essential southern Canada. provide temperature gradient for vitamin synthesis in turtles held indoors The vast majority of turtles spend much of their lives in freshwater ponds, lakes and riv- ers. Although they are in the same family with North American pond and river turtles, box turtles of the U.S. and Mexico are primarily A filtration system terrestrial. to remove waste Tortoises are primarily terrestrial with differ- and prevent ill- ent habitat and diet requirements and are ness in your pet covered in a separate care sheet. turtle Underwater decorations: logs, driftwood, live or artificial plants, rock piles or other hiding places. Submersible thermometer to ensure water temperature is in the correct range, generally mid 70osF; varies with species, age and time of year A small to medium-sized aquarium (20-29 gallons) is ample for one adult of a smaller species Western painted turtle. Painted turtles (e.g., mud, musk). Larger species (sliders, cooters) may need tanks 100 gallons and larger.
    [Show full text]
  • AN INTRODUCTION to Texas Turtles
    TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE AN INTRODUCTION TO Texas Turtles Mark Klym An Introduction to Texas Turtles Turtle, tortoise or terrapin? Many people get confused by these terms, often using them interchangeably. Texas has a single species of tortoise, the Texas tortoise (Gopherus berlanderi) and a single species of terrapin, the diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin). All of the remaining 28 species of the order Testudines found in Texas are called “turtles,” although some like the box turtles (Terrapene spp.) are highly terrestrial others are found only in marine (saltwater) settings. In some countries such as Great Britain or Australia, these terms are very specific and relate to the habit or habitat of the animal; in North America they are denoted using these definitions. Turtle: an aquatic or semi-aquatic animal with webbed feet. Tortoise: a terrestrial animal with clubbed feet, domed shell and generally inhabiting warmer regions. Whatever we call them, these animals are a unique tie to a period of earth’s history all but lost in the living world. Turtles are some of the oldest reptilian species on the earth, virtually unchanged in 200 million years or more! These slow-moving, tooth­ less, egg-laying creatures date back to the dinosaurs and still retain traits they used An Introduction to Texas Turtles | 1 to survive then. Although many turtles spend most of their lives in water, they are air-breathing animals and must come to the surface to breathe. If they spend all this time in water, why do we see them on logs, rocks and the shoreline so often? Unlike birds and mammals, turtles are ectothermic, or cold- blooded, meaning they rely on the temperature around them to regulate their body temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • N.C. Turtles Checklist
    Checklist of Turtles Historically Encountered In Coastal North Carolina by John Hairr, Keith Rittmaster and Ben Wunderly North Carolina Maritime Museums Compiled June 1, 2016 Suborder Family Common Name Scientific Name Conservation Status Testudines Cheloniidae loggerhead Caretta caretta Threatened green turtle Chelonia mydas Threatened hawksbill Eretmochelys imbricata Endangered Kemp’s ridley Lepidochelys kempii Endangered Dermochelyidae leatherback Dermochelys coriacea Endangered Chelydridae common snapping turtle Chelydra serpentina Emydidae eastern painted turtle Chrysemys picta spotted turtle Clemmys guttata eastern chicken turtle Deirochelys reticularia diamondback terrapin Malaclemys terrapin Special concern river cooter Pseudemys concinna redbelly turtle Pseudemys rubriventris eastern box turtle Terrapene carolina yellowbelly slider Trachemys scripta Kinosternidae striped mud turtle Kinosternon baurii eastern mud turtle Kinosternon subrubrum common musk turtle Sternotherus odoratus Trionychidae spiny softshell Apalone spinifera Special concern NOTE: This checklist was compiled and updated from several sources, both in the scientific and popular literature. For scientific names, we have relied on: Turtle Taxonomy Working Group [van Dijk, P.P., Iverson, J.B., Rhodin, A.G.J., Shaffer, H.B., and Bour, R.]. 2014. Turtles of the world, 7th edition: annotated checklist of taxonomy, synonymy, distribution with maps, and conservation status. In: Rhodin, A.G.J., Pritchard, P.C.H., van Dijk, P.P., Saumure, R.A., Buhlmann, K.A., Iverson, J.B., and Mittermeier, R.A. (Eds.). Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonian Research Monographs 5(7):000.329–479, doi:10.3854/crm.5.000.checklist.v7.2014; The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Common Snapping Turtle, Chelydra Serpentina
    The Common Snapping Turtle, Chelydra serpentina Rylen Nakama FISH 423: Olden 12/5/14 Figure 1. The Common Snapping Turtle, one of the most widespread reptiles in North America. Photo taken in Quebec, Canada. Image from https://www.flickr.com/photos/yorthopia/7626614760/. Classification Order: Testudines Family: Chelydridae Genus: Chelydra Species: serpentina (Linnaeus, 1758) Previous research on Chelydra serpentina (Phillips et al., 1996) acknowledged four subspecies, C. s. serpentina (Northern U.S. and Figure 2. Side profile of Chelydra serpentina. Note Canada), C. s. osceola (Southeastern U.S.), C. s. the serrated posterior end of the carapace and the rossignonii (Central America), and C. s. tail’s raised central ridge. Photo from http://pelotes.jea.com/AnimalFact/Reptile/snapturt.ht acutirostris (South America). Recent IUCN m. reclassification of chelonians based on genetic analyses (Rhodin et al., 2010) elevated C. s. rossignonii and C. s. acutirostris to species level and established C. s. osceola as a synonym for C. s. serpentina, thus eliminating subspecies within C. serpentina. Antiquated distinctions between the two formerly recognized North American subspecies were based on negligible morphometric variations between the two populations. Interbreeding in the overlapping range of the two populations was well documented, further discrediting the validity of the subspecies distinction (Feuer, 1971; Aresco and Gunzburger, 2007). Therefore, any emphasis of subspecies differentiation in the ensuing literature should be disregarded. Figure 3. Front-view of a captured Chelydra Continued usage of invalid subspecies names is serpentina. Different skin textures and the distinctive pink mouth are visible from this angle. Photo from still prevalent in the exotic pet trade for C.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Conservation Biology of the North American Wood Turtle (Glyptemys
    Ecology and Conservation Biology of the North American Wood Turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) in the Central Appalachians A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Steven P. Krichbaum May 2018 © 2018 Steven P. Krichbaum. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled Ecology and Conservation Biology of the North American Wood Turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) in the Central Appalachians by STEVEN P. KRICHBAUM has been approved for the Department of Biological Sciences and the College of Arts and Sciences by Willem Roosenburg Professor of Biological Sciences Robert Frank Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 Abstract KRICHBAUM, STEVEN P., Ph.D., May 2018, Biological Sciences Ecology and Conservation Biology of the North American Wood Turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) in the Central Appalachians Director of Dissertation: Willem Roosenburg My study presents information on summer use of terrestrial habitat by IUCN “endangered” North American Wood Turtles (Glyptemys insculpta), sampled over four years at two forested montane sites on the southern periphery of the species’ range in the central Appalachians of Virginia (VA) and West Virginia (WV) USA. The two sites differ in topography, stream size, elevation, and forest composition and structure. I obtained location points for individual turtles during the summer, the period of their most extensive terrestrial roaming. Structural, compositional, and topographical habitat features were measured, counted, or characterized on the ground (e.g., number of canopy trees and identification of herbaceous taxa present) at Wood Turtle locations as well as at paired random points located 23-300m away from each particular turtle location.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Biology of the European Pond Turtle Emys Orbicularis (L) in Italy 219-228 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; Download Unter
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Stapfia Jahr/Year: 2000 Band/Volume: 0069 Autor(en)/Author(s): Zuffi Marco A. L. Artikel/Article: Conservation biology of the European pond turtle Emys orbicularis (L) in Italy 219-228 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Conservation biology of the European pond turtle Emys orbicularis (L) in Italy M.A.L. ZUFFI Abstract Key words The updated situation and knowledge Emys orbicularis, distribution, ecology, of the biology, ecology, behaviour and pro- conservation, Italy, tection of the European pond turtle, Emys orbicularis (L.) in Italy is presented and discussed in the light of conservation bio- logical issues. Stapfia 69, zugleich Kataloge des OÖ. Landesmuseums, Neue Folge Nr. 149 (2000), 219-228 219 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Introduction In this last decade, a "Big Bang" of interest in Italian populations of E. orbiculans enabled Populations of Emys orbicularis in Italy are to build up a consistent data set. Information distributed mainly in coastal areas and inter- on biometry (Zum & GARIBOLDI 1995a, b), nal plains. Most regions of Italy have been systematics (FRITZ & OBST 1995; FRITZ 1998), mapped, but in some cases the information is population structure (KELLER et al. 1998; KEL- incomplete (Fig. 1, Societas Herpetologica LER 1999), space usage (LEBBOROM & CHELA - Italica 1996). An uncomplete knowledge of ZZI 1991), reproductive biology (ZUFFI & habitat use leads to a biased view on the ODETTI 1998; ZUFFI et al. 1999; KELLER 1999), and thermal ecology (Dl TRAM & ZUFFI 1997), have become available.
    [Show full text]
  • In AR, FL, GA, IA, KY, LA, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, and TX): Species in Red = Depleted to the Point They May Warrant Federal Endangered Species Act Listing
    Southern and Midwestern Turtle Species Affected by Commercial Harvest (in AR, FL, GA, IA, KY, LA, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, and TX): species in red = depleted to the point they may warrant federal Endangered Species Act listing Common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) – AR, GA, IA, KY, MO, OH, OK, SC, TX Florida common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina osceola) - FL Southern painted turtle (Chrysemys dorsalis) – AR Western painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) – IA, MO, OH, OK Spotted turtle (Clemmys gutatta) - FL, GA, OH Florida chicken turtle (Deirochelys reticularia chrysea) – FL Western chicken turtle (Deirochelys reticularia miaria) – AR, FL, GA, KY, MO, OK, TN, TX Barbour’s map turtle (Graptemys barbouri) - FL, GA Cagle’s map turtle (Graptemys caglei) - TX Escambia map turtle (Graptemys ernsti) – FL Common map turtle (Graptemys geographica) – AR, GA, OH, OK Ouachita map turtle (Graptemys ouachitensis) – AR, GA, OH, OK, TX Sabine map turtle (Graptemys ouachitensis sabinensis) – TX False map turtle (Graptemys pseudogeographica) – MO, OK, TX Mississippi map turtle (Graptemys pseuogeographica kohnii) – AR, TX Alabama map turtle (Graptemys pulchra) – GA Texas map turtle (Graptemys versa) - TX Striped mud turtle (Kinosternon baurii) – FL, GA, SC Yellow mud turtle (Kinosternon flavescens) – OK, TX Common mud turtle (Kinosternon subrubrum) – AR, FL, GA, OK, TX Alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) – AR, FL, GA, LA, MO, TX Diamond-back terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) – FL, GA, LA, SC, TX River cooter (Pseudemys concinna) – AR, FL,
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Painted Turtle Chrysemys Picta Picta Description Painted Turtles Are Commonly Found Around Quiet Bodies of Water
    WILDLIFE IN CONNECTICUT WILDLIFE FACT SHEET Eastern Painted Turtle Chrysemys picta picta Description Painted turtles are commonly found around quiet bodies of water. These brightly colored turtles gain their name J. FUSCO © PAUL from colorful markings along the head, neck, and shell. They often can be observed basking on logs and rocks around a body of water and will quickly scoot into water if threatened or disturbed. The medium-sized painted turtle can be distinguished by its dark shell, which has olive lines running across the carapace (upper shell), dividing the large scutes (scales). The margin of both the carapace and plastron (bottom shell) have black and red markings. The head, neck, and limbs have yellow stripes. The plastron is typically yellow, but may be stained a rust/red color. Males can be distinguished from females by their long front claws, long tail, and smaller size. The carapace of an adult usually measures from 4.5 to 6 inches in length. Range The painted turtle is the most widely distributed North basking on rocks and logs, even on top of one another. American turtle, and the only one to range across the Opportunistic, painted turtles can be found in brackish entire continent. This species ranges from coast to tidal waters and salt marshes. Much of their time is spent coast through the northern United States and southern concealed in submerged vegetation. The turtles spend Canada, south to the Gulf of Mexico from Louisiana to the winter hibernating in mud or decayed vegetation southwestern Alabama. on pond bottoms, emerging earlier than other turtles, The painted turtle is Connecticut's most numerous turtle typically in March.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment for the Western Pond Turtle Final Report
    Assessment for the Western Pond Turtle Final Report Client: United States Fish and Wildlife Service Primary Advisor: Brad Shaffer Secondary Advisor: Peter Scott Team Members: Zachary Devereux Hogan Fenster Stephanie Manzo Thomas Morgan Griffin Nicholson Delacey Rodriguez Bianca Sanchez University of California, Los Angeles Executive Summary Western Pond Turtle Report June 2019 The western pond turtle (WPT), recently separated into two species, is a candidate for listing under the Endangered Species Act. To assess the current status of both species, we conducted a risk assessment and analysis of historical, current, and future conditions. Background This assessment for the WPT compiles the best available literature, scientific information, museum data, and population viability analyses to characterize the biological status of the two species: Emys (Actinemys) pallida and Emys (Actinemys) marmorata. The goal of this assessment is to inform the listing decision for the two species under the federal Endangered Species Act, and to act as a source of information for future conservation efforts. Species Biology and Needs The WPT occurs in a variety of semi-aquatic habitats ranging from lakes, rivers, and streams to man-made channels, agricultural ponds, and sewage treatment ponds. Emys pallida can be found from northern Baja California, Mexico to the southern San Francisco Bay area along the coast and inland deserts. It can be found along the Southern Coast Ranges and the western parts of the San Joaquin Valley. Emys marmorata can be found from the San Francisco bay area north to Washington state and south along the eastern side of the San Joaquin Valley. The WPT is a medium sized pond turtle that has a maximum life span of about 45 years (Holland 1994, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Painted Turtle (Chrysemys Picta Belli) Overview
    Western Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta belli) Overview Predicted Impacts Habitat Change 2030 26 to 68 % Loss 2060 48 to 82 % Loss 2090 96 to 100 % Loss Adaptive capacity Moderately Low Fire Response Mixed Status: Chrysemys picta has four subspecies, of which only C. p. belli is found within New Mexico. Collectively, C. picta are considered “Demonstrably Secure” in the Natural Heritage global rank but more locally, C. p. belli is considered a species of greatest conservation need in New Mexico and critically imperiled in Arizona by State Heritage Programs (NMDGF 2006). Range and Habitat: The western painted turtle is found throughout the western U.S. though its range is limited to riparian systems in warmer areas like the Southwest (Figure 1). Chrysemys picta belli is an aquatic species that is found in slow-moving or still water bodies. This species has been found on the margins of lakes and river pools, streams, ditches and cattle tanks. They can be present in ponds as much as a mile from a river and are typically not found in the river itself, but in water bodies associated with rivers. Nests are dug in a variety of soils (with a depth of at least 9 cm) in a sunny area. Figure 1. Range of Crysemys picta belli (in blue) Western Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta belli) Climate Impacts and Adaptive Capacity Adaptive Capacity Score = 0.84 (Moderately low) Though C. p. belli is likely to be sensitive to a number of future changes, it scored neutral for many traits (Table 1). The western painted turtle is closely associated with wet habitats in the southwest, with few specific requirements outside of the presence of water.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural History & Distribution of Riverine Turtles in West Virginia
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2010 The aN tural History & Distribution of Riverine Turtles in West Virginia Linh Diem Phu Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Phu, Linh Diem, "The aN tural History & Distribution of Riverine Turtles in West Virginia" (2010). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 787. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Natural History & Distribution of Riverine Turtles in West Virginia Thesis submitted to the Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences By Linh Diem Phu Dr. Thomas K. Pauley, Ph.D., Committee Chairperson Dr. Dan Evans, Ph.D. Dr. Suzanne Strait, Ph.D. Marshall University May 2010 Abstract Turtles are unique evolutionary marvels that evolved from amphibians and developed their protective shelled form more than 200 million years ago. In West Virginia, there are 10 native species of turtles, 9 of which are aquatic. Most of these aquatic turtles feed on carrion and dead plant matter, in the water and essentially "clean" our water systems. Turtles are long-lived animals with sensitive life stages that can serve as both long-term and short-term bioindicators of environmental health. With the increase in commercial trade, habitat fragmentation, degradation, destruction, there has been a marked decline in turtle species.
    [Show full text]