' ' ' I ‘ *flfsmf WHO [00K GREAT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

' ' ' I ‘ *flfsmf WHO [00K GREAT H .‘ Ä l“: \ I I ‘ \ l k ,.._ E ¥ \ FASSBENDER TEES OFF! ‘ CLOAK & HACKER How nusslks DIGITAL sms ARE PLANNING To INVAIJE AMERICA PENN STATE wnv Is FOOTBALL THESPoRToF sex PREDATORS? nun .' ' ' i ‘ *flfsmf WHO [00K GREAT. .ALLTHE RULES "SHOW IE I I STIIIGHTFOIHAID 54,99 "III III llFE. IT CAN BE VERY SIMPLE, BIIT IT CAI SET VERY COMPLICATED.‘ —Ii|:lael Installer UH“) HE TABLE OF NTENTS Ta INTO THE COUNTRY Joe Alwyn, the breakout smr nfb‘i'lly Lynn's Long Halfr‘ime Walk. tries on the seron's most stylish outdoor clothes, pg. 122 The Spark Michael Fassbender has a gift that makes great directors want to line up for him. But what happens to the life Ufa private man when he always has m reveal himself? Best of Times. BY AMANDA Worst of Times. I’ETRUSICH Some days. \I'nu \\ oke up p g . 10 6 feelim.r like yuu \\ ere “\ng in the spring See No Evil, Hear No of hope: other days. the Evil, Speak No Evil \\ inter nfdespuiiz Have He u b the head {mitlmll we reached utnpia 0r much zit .in elite prep Armageddon? \,k'l1|)l)l. HL‘ “1h. JIM) .1 CONTRIBUTION.'S HY \eriul pudnphih’ TED HELLER AND HY hlx’H' LE“ IS DANIEL SCHOFIELI) p g . 114 p g. ‘l 3 8 The Plot Against That '805 Show America Just like the mnmter I he mxhle «um ul hmv nn Stranger Things. HIHHJH xpiwhuckcd their hit slut“. the Ihx- l .N, elm'tiun buffer hmthen wenn-d “Y III()\I \\. II”) \'\II m come out ufnmvhere \ [(‘l\\ \\ \l'xll BY S'I‘EVI‘ZN I.I'.'k‘l\v\l>\”l' pg. 130 p g . 144 ON THE COVER: MICHAEL FASSBENDER PHOTOGRAPHED EXCLUSIVELY FOR ESOUIRE BY CEDRIC BUCHET. SUIT, SHIRT, AND TIE BY BURv BERRY; WATCH BY PATEK PHILIPPE PRODUCED BY LAURA OUGHTON FOR ROSCO PRODUCTION. STYLING BY NICK SULLIVAN. STYLING (UK) BY CHRIS BENNS ASSISTANT STYLING (UK) BY NATASHA CHANG LEWIS GROOMING BY CARLOS FERRAZ FOR CAROL HAYES MANAGEMENT SET DESIGN BY ALEXANDRA LEAVEY FOR THE MAGNET AGENCY. THIS PAGE: PHOTOGRAPH BY DUSAN RELJIN. SHIRT BY BILLY REID; T-SHIRT BY SAVE KHAKI UNITED; JEANS BY DSQUAREDZ. 19 confidential files from the eratit DNL‘ THE HACKERS USED THE LANGUAGE 0F ins would still m n'kjustfine. found their way to the public. On July 3.“. three days before AMERICANS FRUSTRATED Throughout the campaign. Guc- the Democratic National (.‘unven- "ASYOU SEE cifer maintained that he was the WITH WASHINGTON. tion in Philadelphia, Wikilcaks only person behind the hacking THE U. S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS published the largest troveol‘iilcs and leaking. “This is my personal ARE BECOMING A FARCE.” to date, which included nearly project and I‘m proud ofit," he— twenty thousand hacked emails. or they—wrote in late June. But Press coverage of the release several sloppy mistakes soon re— quickly centered on emails that vealedwhowas reallybehind the operation. designed to trick their victims into clicking suggested a bias among some DNC staff- The unraveling happened more quicklythan a link that would install malware or send ers in favor oinllar\_' Clinton. The leaked anybody could have anticipated. them to a fake but familiar-looking login site emails lentcredence to a suspicion held by to harvest their passwords. The malicious some Democrats that the party establish- AS SOON AS Guccifer's files hit the linkswere hiddenbehind short URLs ofthe ment had never intended to give Bernie open Internet. an armyofinvestigators—in- sort often used on Twitter. Sanders, Clinton‘s opponent in the prima— cludingold—school hackers, former spooks. T0 manage so many short URLs, Fan- ries, a fairshake. Protesters in Philadelphia security consultants, and journalists—de- cy Bear had created an automated system held up signs that read ELECTION FRAUD scended on the hastily leaked data. Infor- that used a popular link—shortening ser— and DNC LEAKS SHAME. One day before the mal, self—organized orgoups of sleuths dis— vicecalled Bitly. Thespear-phishing emails convention, the Russian kompromat cam— cussed their discoveries over encrypted worked well—one in seven victims revealed paign took its first trophy: Debbie Wasser- messaging apps such as Signal. Many of their passwords—but the hackers forgotto man Schultz, the DN C chair, resigned from the self-appointed analysts had never met set two oftheirBitly accounts to “private.” the organization. in person, and sometimes they didn't know As a result, acybersecurity company called The episode shocked the Democratic es- one another's real names, b SecureWorks was able to glean information tablishment, not least because of what it about Fancy Bear’s targets. Between Octo- augured for the future. As Clinton’s lead ber 2015 and May 2016, the hackinggroup in the polls widened after the convention, used nine thousand links to attack about commentators began to speculate that a intelligen four thousand Gmail accounts, including damaging leak late in the campaign might ' and o targets in Ukraine, the Baltics, the United be the only chance for Donald Trump to a“ States, China, and Iran. Fancy Bear tried win the election. Fears of a Russia-spon- to gain access to defense ministries, em- sored October surprise grew as it became bassies, and military attaches. The largest clearer thatthe subversion effort was im- _ group oftargets, some 40percent, were cur- proving. When files appeared, they were >tlent and former military personnel. Among now scrubbed of the sort of distinguish— e group’s recent breaches were the Ger- ing metadata that had allowed analysts to parliament, the Italian military, the trace the leak back to Russian intelligence. l u ' foreign ministry, the email accounts The operators behind Guccifer and DC ‘p Breedlove, Colin Powell, and John Leaks also appear to have recognized that ~—Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair— American journalists were desperate for . d, ofcourse, the DNC. scoops, no matter their source. The Rus- sians began to act like a PR agency, provid- ' ID P U B L I C reconstruc- ing access to reporters at Politico, The Inter~ metadata settings, which, he sugge I NC break-in appears to have cept, and BuzzFeed. Journalists were eager q vealed a failure ofoperational security. ckers offguard. Researchers to help. On August 27, when part ofthe DC A second mistake had to do with the com- ‘ Russianspies had not ex— Leaks website was down for some reason, puterthat had been usedto control the hack- pected to "I ntified so quickly, a theory Twittersuspended the @DCLeaks account. ing operation. Researchers found that the that would explain, among other things, the The DailyCaller, a conservative news web- malicious software, or malware, used to peculiaranimus Guccifer seemed to havefor site, posted a story about the events, draw- break into the DNC was controlled bya ma- CrowdStrike. Accordingto this hypothesis, ing an outcry from Trump supporters. Lou chine that had been involved in a2015 hack the tradecraft blunders that Tait and others Dobbs, the Fox Business anchor, sneered ofthe German parliament. German intelli- had identified were the result ofa hasty ef- that “leftist fascism” was throttling the last gence later traced the Bundestag breach to fortby the GRU to cover its tracks. best hope for aTrump victory. Twittersoon the Russian GRU, aka Fancy Bear. As ifto regroup after the initial rushof ac- reinstated @DCLeaks. There were othererrors, too, includinga tivity, Guccifer and DC Leaks went quiet at The most effective outletby far, however, Russian smile emoji—“)))"—and emails to the end of June. But the 2016 presidential was WikiLeaks. Russian intelligence like— journalists that explicitly associated Guc- campaign, already the most bizarre in liv- ly began feedinghacked documents to Ju— cifer 2.0 with DC Leaks, as the cybersecu- ingmemory, had a further surprise in store, lian Assange’s “whistleblower” site in June rity firm ThreatConnect pointed out. But one thatworked in favorofthe Russians. At 2015, after breaching Saudi Arabia's foreign the hackers’ gravest mistake involved the a time when only 32 percent ofAmericans ministry. A group called WikiSaudiLeaks. emails they'd used to initiate their attack. say that they trust the media to report the probably a Guccifer-like front for Fancy AS part of a so—called spear-phishing cam- news fairlyand accurately, the hackers were Bear, claimed that “WikiLeaks have been Pai’ng, Fancy Bear hademailedthousands of about to learn that gettingcalled out public- given access to some part of these docu— targets around the world. The emails were lydidn't really matter: Theirkompromatop- ments.“ The so-called Saudi Cables showed 133 princes buying influence and monitoring dissidents. They became a major news sto- ry. Proving that the old methods \\ orked PART 2 even better in the t\\'ent\_‘—h‘rst century. A leak released at theendofthis past sum— mer showed how frictimilesslythe kompro— THE RUSSIAN E'MIGRE' mat campaingi was able to operate in the fact—free atmosphere of the 2016 Ameri- can presidential campaign. In late Septem- LEADING ber, DC Leaks publishedhundreds ofemails. from the account of a twenty—two—year—old freelancer for the Clinton campaign. Lach— THE lan Markay, a reporter for The Ha’shingron FreeBeacon, found an audio clip buried deep in the cache. In the recording, which was FIGHT made at a fundraiser in Virginia, Hillary Clinton could be heard describing Sanders TO PROTECT AMERICA supporters as “children ofthe Great Reces- sion” who “are living in their parents' base— BY VICKY WARD ment.” The comments were clumsybut. in context, hardly damning; Clinton was de— scribing the appeal of Sanders‘s “political O'CLOCK on the morning of revolution" for young voters. (“We want " ay 6, Dmitri Alperovitch woke up in a people to be idealistic." she said.) Never- .
Recommended publications
  • Terrence Andrew Davis Message
    Friend Request Sent Suggest Friends Terrence Andrew Davis Message Timeline About Friends Photos More Intro Terrence Andrew Davis updated his profile picture. March 10 · Studied at Arizona State University Went to Agua Fria High School Lives in Las Vegas, Nevada Share 1 BibleStreamer Israel TempleBot (God) Says... trust rendezvous silicosis affiliating Hiss's screechier phoning ravelled populist's slingshot's Deanna callings left's anonymity's respelled fabrication's exemplifying casters friendliness's quiescence refusal russet filigreeing southwest paramedic's townhouse's debilities taproots flunked gauzy Moldavia Minnesota's May 24 at 11:46pm · Edited Featured Albums Terrence Andrew Davis updated his cover photo. March 10 · English (US) · Español · Português (Brasil) · Français (France) · Deutsch Privacy · Terms · Advertising · Ad Choices · Cookies · More Facebook © 2017 Share 1 Share Terrence Andrew Davis December 30, 2015 · What's a good tombstone, God? God says... Isidro's brigantine's prediction's Quinton's guile musician Coppola's leukocyte's whippoorwill's stokes finished ibexes Earlene's marrows magnetically Krishnamurti yahoos futz George's staccato's platypuses eloquence's finery's wiggly gouges engages Leningrad's Shackleton Mon mistaken Amoco alcoholic Share Terrence Andrew Davis December 30, 2015 · God says... swelter's legibly streptococcal lobster's deleting cowlick's schoolmistress itemization snowsuit's sawdust goings scanners ancestor crystals whined Pele noise's Royal exhausting nationalized trotted hollowing symbolizes impecunious stutters Chukchi territorial snug wiped candlesticks faeces oligarchic Share Terrence Andrew Davis December 30, 2015 · CIA agents will sandpaper their SS tatoos. Share Terrence Andrew Davis December 30, 2015 · http://science.slashdot.org/…/exploding-munitions-caught-on… God says..
    [Show full text]
  • Hacking the Web
    Hacking the Web (C) 2009-2020 Arun Viswanathan Ellis Horowitz Marco Papa 1 Table of Contents } General Introduction } Authentication Attacks } Client-Side Attacks } Injection Attacks } Recent Attacks } Privacy Tools 2 (C) 2009-2020 Arun Viswanathan Ellis Horowitz Marco Papa Why secure the Web? } The Web has evolved into an ubiquitous entity providing a rich and common platform for connecting people and doing business. } BUT, the Web also offers a cheap, effective, convenient and anonymous platform for crime. } To get an idea, the Web has been used for the following types of criminal activities (source: The Web Hacking Incidents Database (WHID) http://projects.webappsec.org/w/page/13246995/Web-Hacking-Incident-Database) } Chaos (Attack on Russian nuclear power websites amid accident rumors (5Jan09) } Deceit (SAMY XSS Worm – Nov 2005) } Extortion (David Aireys domain hijacked due to a CSRF (cross site request forgery) flaw in Gmail – 30Dec2007) } Identity Theft (XSS on Yahoo! Hot jobs – Oct 2008) } Information Warfare (Israeli Gaza War - Jan 2009 / Balkan Wars – Apr 2008 ) } Monetary Loss (eBay fraud using XSS) } Physical Pain (Hackers post on epilepsy forum causes migraines and seizures – May 2008) } Political Defacements (Hacker changes news release on Sheriffs website – Jul 2008) (Obama, Oreilly and Britneys Twitter accounts hacked and malicious comments posted – Jan 09) } Chinese Gaming sites hacked (Dec. 2011) 3 Copyright(C) 2009 (c) -20092020- 2019Arun Arun Viswanathan Viswanathan Ellis HorowitzEllis Horowitz Marco Marco Papa Papa
    [Show full text]
  • UC Santa Cruz Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Santa Cruz UC Santa Cruz Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Unbecoming Silicon Valley: Techno Imaginaries and Materialities in Postsocialist Romania Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0vt9c4bq Author McElroy, Erin Mariel Brownstein Publication Date 2019 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ UNBECOMING SILICON VALLEY: TECHNO IMAGINARIES AND MATERIALITIES IN POSTSOCIALIST ROMANIA A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in FEMINIST STUDIES by Erin Mariel Brownstein McElroy June 2019 The Dissertation of Erin McElroy is approved: ________________________________ Professor Neda Atanasoski, Chair ________________________________ Professor Karen Barad ________________________________ Professor Lisa Rofel ________________________________ Professor Megan Moodie ________________________________ Professor Liviu Chelcea ________________________________ Lori Kletzer Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Erin McElroy 2019 Table of Contents Abstract, iv-v Acknowledgements, vi-xi Introduction: Unbecoming Silicon Valley: Techno Imaginaries and Materialities in Postsocialist Romania, 1-44 Chapter 1: Digital Nomads in Siliconizing Cluj: Material and Allegorical Double Dispossession, 45-90 Chapter 2: Corrupting Techno-normativity in Postsocialist Romania: Queering Code and Computers, 91-127 Chapter 3: The Light Revolution, Blood Gold, and
    [Show full text]
  • View Final Report (PDF)
    TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY III INTRODUCTION 1 GENESIS OF THE PROJECT 1 RESEARCH QUESTIONS 1 INDUSTRY SITUATION 2 METHODOLOGY 3 GENERAL COMMENTS ON INTERVIEWS 5 APT1 (CHINA) 6 SUMMARY 7 THE GROUP 7 TIMELINE 7 TYPOLOGY OF ATTACKS 9 DISCLOSURE EVENTS 9 APT10 (CHINA) 13 INTRODUCTION 14 THE GROUP 14 TIMELINE 15 TYPOLOGY OF ATTACKS 16 DISCLOSURE EVENTS 18 COBALT (CRIMINAL GROUP) 22 INTRODUCTION 23 THE GROUP 23 TIMELINE 25 TYPOLOGY OF ATTACKS 27 DISCLOSURE EVENTS 30 APT33 (IRAN) 33 INTRODUCTION 34 THE GROUP 34 TIMELINE 35 TYPOLOGY OF ATTACKS 37 DISCLOSURE EVENTS 38 APT34 (IRAN) 41 INTRODUCTION 42 THE GROUP 42 SIPA Capstone 2020 i The Impact of Information Disclosures on APT Operations TIMELINE 43 TYPOLOGY OF ATTACKS 44 DISCLOSURE EVENTS 48 APT38 (NORTH KOREA) 52 INTRODUCTION 53 THE GROUP 53 TIMELINE 55 TYPOLOGY OF ATTACKS 59 DISCLOSURE EVENTS 61 APT28 (RUSSIA) 65 INTRODUCTION 66 THE GROUP 66 TIMELINE 66 TYPOLOGY OF ATTACKS 69 DISCLOSURE EVENTS 71 APT29 (RUSSIA) 74 INTRODUCTION 75 THE GROUP 75 TIMELINE 76 TYPOLOGY OF ATTACKS 79 DISCLOSURE EVENTS 81 COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS 84 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ACTOR RESPONSE 84 CONTRIBUTING FACTORS TO SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES 86 MEASURING THE SUCCESS OF DISCLOSURES 90 IMPLICATIONS OF OUR RESEARCH 92 FOR PERSISTENT ENGAGEMENT AND FORWARD DEFENSE 92 FOR PRIVATE CYBERSECURITY VENDORS 96 FOR THE FINANCIAL SECTOR 96 ROOM FOR FURTHER RESEARCH 97 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 98 ABOUT THE TEAM 99 SIPA Capstone 2020 ii The Impact of Information Disclosures on APT Operations EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This project was completed to fulfill the including the scope of the disclosure and capstone requirement for Columbia Uni- the disclosing actor.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporting, and General Mentions Seem to Be in Decline
    CYBER THREAT ANALYSIS Return to Normalcy: False Flags and the Decline of International Hacktivism By Insikt Group® CTA-2019-0821 CYBER THREAT ANALYSIS Groups with the trappings of hacktivism have recently dumped Russian and Iranian state security organization records online, although neither have proclaimed themselves to be hacktivists. In addition, hacktivism has taken a back seat in news reporting, and general mentions seem to be in decline. Insikt Group utilized the Recorded FutureⓇ Platform and reports of historical hacktivism events to analyze the shifting targets and players in the hacktivism space. The target audience of this research includes security practitioners whose enterprises may be targets for hacktivism. Executive Summary Hacktivism often brings to mind a loose collective of individuals globally that band together to achieve a common goal. However, Insikt Group research demonstrates that this is a misleading assumption; the hacktivist landscape has consistently included actors reacting to regional events, and has also involved states operating under the guise of hacktivism to achieve geopolitical goals. In the last 10 years, the number of large-scale, international hacking operations most commonly associated with hacktivism has risen astronomically, only to fall off just as dramatically after 2015 and 2016. This constitutes a return to normalcy, in which hacktivist groups are usually small sets of regional actors targeting specific organizations to protest regional events, or nation-state groups operating under the guise of hacktivism. Attack vectors used by hacktivist groups have remained largely consistent from 2010 to 2019, and tooling has assisted actors to conduct larger-scale attacks. However, company defenses have also become significantly better in the last decade, which has likely contributed to the decline in successful hacktivist operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Hacks, Leaks and Disruptions | Russian Cyber Strategies
    CHAILLOT PAPER Nº 148 — October 2018 Hacks, leaks and disruptions Russian cyber strategies EDITED BY Nicu Popescu and Stanislav Secrieru WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM Siim Alatalu, Irina Borogan, Elena Chernenko, Sven Herpig, Oscar Jonsson, Xymena Kurowska, Jarno Limnell, Patryk Pawlak, Piret Pernik, Thomas Reinhold, Anatoly Reshetnikov, Andrei Soldatov and Jean-Baptiste Jeangène Vilmer Chaillot Papers HACKS, LEAKS AND DISRUPTIONS RUSSIAN CYBER STRATEGIES Edited by Nicu Popescu and Stanislav Secrieru CHAILLOT PAPERS October 2018 148 Disclaimer The views expressed in this Chaillot Paper are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute or of the European Union. European Union Institute for Security Studies Paris Director: Gustav Lindstrom © EU Institute for Security Studies, 2018. Reproduction is authorised, provided prior permission is sought from the Institute and the source is acknowledged, save where otherwise stated. Contents Executive summary 5 Introduction: Russia’s cyber prowess – where, how and what for? 9 Nicu Popescu and Stanislav Secrieru Russia’s cyber posture Russia’s approach to cyber: the best defence is a good offence 15 1 Andrei Soldatov and Irina Borogan Russia’s trolling complex at home and abroad 25 2 Xymena Kurowska and Anatoly Reshetnikov Spotting the bear: credible attribution and Russian 3 operations in cyberspace 33 Sven Herpig and Thomas Reinhold Russia’s cyber diplomacy 43 4 Elena Chernenko Case studies of Russian cyberattacks The early days of cyberattacks: 5 the cases of Estonia,
    [Show full text]
  • Munkavállalói Adatok Szivárogtak Az Nvidiatól
    Munkavállalói adatok szivárogtak az Nvidiatól 2015.01.05. 09:58 | Csizmazia Darab István [Rambo] | Szólj hozzá! Címkék: nvidia jelszó incidens security adatszivárgás jelszócsere breach welivesecurity.com A nagy adatlopási ügyek mellett történnek azért rendre "kisebb" horderejű, de azért szintén fontos biztonsági incidensek is, amelyek szintén nem tanulság nélkül valóak. Ezúttal az Nvidia háza táján történt olyan, dolgozói adatokat érintő adatlopás még decemberben, amely miatt a cég jelszóváltoztatásra és óvatosságra figyelmeztette saját munkavállalóit. A Forbes beszámolója szerint a jelszavak azonnali megváltoztatása mellett arra is kiemelten felhívták a figyelmet, hogy fokozott óvatossággal kezeljenek minden kéretlen levélben érkező adathalász próbálkozást. Ilyen esetekben ugyanis a kiszivárgott személyes információk birtokában sokszor testre-szabott, személyes hangvételű banki vagy látszólag munkatársak, barátok nevében érkező, és jelszavainkkal kapcsolatos kéréseket tartalmazó phishing megkeresések is érkezhetnek. A fenti hamis megkeresési trükkök mellett a dolgozóknak érdekes módon általában nehezükre esik elfogadni a valóságos belső fenyegetés veszélyét is, pedig a támadások, adatszivárgások alkalmával számos esetben van valamilyen belső szál is. Emellett emlékezetes lehet, hogy annak idején több mint 20 olyan embert azonosítottak, akik simán megadták az azonosítójukat és a jelszavukat Snowdennek, aki kollégái hozzáférését is felhasználta az adatgyűjtései és kiszivárogtatásai során. Mivel az eset több, mint 500 dolgozót is érinthetett,
    [Show full text]
  • The Management and Insurance of Cyber
    CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................... 5 LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................... 5 ANNEXURES ........................................................................................................................................... 5 DEFINTIONS ........................................................................................................................................... 6 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................ 16 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 17 2. Emerging cyber exposures ....................................................................................................... 19 2.1 Cyber-crime ..................................................................................................................... 20 2.1.1 Business Disruption and Misuse .................................................................................. 20 2.1.2 Online scams ................................................................................................................ 23 2.1.3 Theft and Fraud ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Belling the BEAR
    2016/12/21 Russia Hacks Bellingcat MH17 Investigation | ThreatConnect SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 Belling the BEAR IN BLOG, FEATURED ARTICLE, RESEARCH BY THREATCONNECT RESEARCH TEAM ThreatConnect reviews activity targeting Bellingcat, a key contributor in the MH17 investigation. Read the full series of ThreatConnect posts following the DNC Breach: “Rebooting Watergate: Tapping into the Democratic National Committee [https://www.threatconnect.com/tapping-into-democratic-national-committee/] ”, “Shiny Object? Guccifer 2.0 and the DNC Breach [https://www.threatconnect.com/guccifer-2-0-dnc-breach/] “, “What’s in a Name Server? [https://www.threatconnect.com/whats-in-a-name-server/] “, “Guccifer 2.0: the Man, the Myth, the Legend? [https://www.threatconnect.com/reassesing-guccifer-2-0-recent-claims/] “, “Guccifer 2.0: All Roads Lead to Russia [https://www.threatconnect.com/guccifer-2-all-roads-lead-russia/] “, “FANCY BEAR Has an (IT) Itch that They Can’t Scratch [https://www.threatconnect.com/fancy-bear-it-itch-they-cant-scratch/] “, “Does a BEAR Leak in the Woods? [https://www.threatconnect.com/blog/does-a-bear-leak-in-the-woods/] “, and “Russian Cyber Operations on Steroids [https://www.threatconnect.com/blog/fancy-bear-anti-doping-agency-phishing/] “. [UPDATE] October 7th 2016 [/russia-hacks-bellingcat-mh17-investigation#update] Introduction Since posting about the DNC hack [https://threatconnect.com/blog/tapping-into-democratic-national-committee/] , each time we published a blog post on a BEAR-based topic we thought it was going to be our last. But like the Death Star’s gravitational pull, the story keeps drawing us back in as new information comes to light.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Provided by DHS Regarding Russian Scanning Was Incorrect Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 12:49:59 PM
    From: (b) (6) To: (b) (6) Subject: FW: Information Provided by DHS Regarding Russian Scanning was Incorrect Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 12:49:59 PM From: Secretary of State, Press Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 2:58:05 PM To: Secretary of State, Press Subject: Information Provided by DHS Regarding Russian Scanning was Incorrect AP17:073 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 27, 2017 CONTACT: Jesse Melgar or Sam Mahood (916) 653-6575 Information Provided by DHS Regarding Russian Scanning was Incorrect SACRAMENTO – California Secretary of State Alex Padilla issued the following statement. “Last Friday, my office was notified by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that Russian cyber actors 'scanned' California’s Internet-facing systems in 2016, including Secretary of State websites. Following our request for further information, it became clear that DHS’ conclusions were wrong.” “DHS confirmed that Russian scanning activity had actually occurred on the California Department of Technology statewide network, not any Secretary of State website. Based on this additional information, California voters can further rest assured that the California Secretary of State elections infrastructure and websites were not hacked or breached by Russian cyber actors.” “Our notification from DHS last Friday was not only a year late, it also turned out to be bad information. To make matters worse, the Associated Press similarly reported that DHS has reversed itself and 'now says Russia didn’t target Wisconsin’s voter registration system,' which is contrary to previous briefings.” epic.org EPIC-17-03-31-DHS-FOIA-20180416-Production-1 000001 NPPD 000650 “The work of our intelligence agencies is critical in defending against cyber threats.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyber Attacks: Implications for Current and Future Policy
    Cyber attacks: Implications for current and future policy Introduction 2 Fancy Bear Group 2 Targets of the attack 3 International Republican Institute 3 The Hudson Institute 4 Description of the attacks 5 Reaction 8 Political consequences 9 Conclusion 11 References 12 1 Introduction Information networks are now everywhere But how are these attacks carried out? who and no field can escape it, especially not are the actors behind the scenes. What are politics. Increasingly often cyber-related the stakes involved and what enables these scandals are breaking out and the aim of attacks? To answer these questions, this case many of them is the destabilizing a country's study focuses on the group known as Fancy political life. The Estonian government in Bear and its attacks on the International 2007 [1], a French political party in 2017 or Republican Institute and the Hudson the German government in early 2019 [3]. Institute Think Tank in 2018. The case was These and many other countries have chosen because of its context and the suffered a cyber attack against their reactions of the actors involved. First section governments. Even the United States which of this case study discusses the Fancy Bear is considered the most powerful country in cybercriminal group. Next, the two targets the world, is an recurring victim of these of the attack are introduced and some of the type of cyber attacks. For example, the political context will be given before recent Russian interference in 2016 that explaining the actual attack in the third targeted the presidential elections had section.
    [Show full text]
  • Ransomware a MULTI-HEADED MONSTER to BEAT
    Ransomware A MULTI-HEADED MONSTER TO BEAT ERIK HESKES MAY 2021 RANSOMWARE Ransomware Introduction Ransomware is a buzzword and a real threat. A sophisticated attack or a script kiddie may lead to this result: a complete lockdown of a company with the associated damage. This damage can be enormous. Not only because the systems are down and no work can be done, but also because restoring the system, either by paying the ransom or by hiring specialists is very expensive indeed. And then there's reputational damage. When asked how it got to this point, hardly anyone has a good answer.... With the resources available, the attacker has every chance of committing a successful attack. This white paper covers the history of this type of attacks, the reasons for the attacker to carry out such an attack, the various ways of ransomware attacks and, very important, it describes the key protection measures that need to be in place to reduce chances of becoming a victim of these attack. Understanding the variety in ransomware attacks from the recent past is necessary to be able to determine the best strategy to protect the company’s data systems. Although, as you will see, dealing with ransomware is like dealing with a multi-headed monster. What is Ransomware? Ransomware can be defined as a type of malware that can infect a system by the encryption of files, folders, or an entire system. The compromised system shows the victim that a ransom needs to be paid, often by means of transferring a set amount of cryptocurrency or a large sum of money to an account or crypto wallet controlled by the attacker.
    [Show full text]