DOCSLIB.ORG

Scruise Report R/V Roger Revelle Cruise RR0901 10 January 2009 To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scruise Report R/V Roger Revelle Cruise RR0901 10 January 2009 To SCruise Report R/V Roger Revelle Cruise RR0901 10 January 2009 to 24 February 2009 Diapycnal and Isopycnal Mixing Experiment in the Southern Ocean DIMES Cruise US1 Deployment Cruise Chief Scientist James R. Ledwell Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution [email protected] Brian Guest, Leah Houghton, and Cynthia Sellers Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Stewart C. Sutherland Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Peter Lazarevich and Nicolas Wienders Florida State University Ryan Abernathey and Cimarron J. L. Wortham Massachusetts Institution of Technology Byron Kilbourne University of Washington Magdalena Carranza and Uriel Zajaczkovski University of Buenos Aires Jonathan Meyer and Meghan K. Donohue Scripps Institution of Oceanography 2 November 2012 Acknowledgements Captain David Murline and the crew of R/V Roger Revelle provided excellent and steadfast support during this cruise. The marine operations and science support groups at Scripps Institution of Oceanography were thorough, professional and helpful, especially Jonathan Meyer and Meghan Donohue, the marine technicians on the cruise. Lawrence Anderson, Valery Kosneyrev, and Dennis McGillicuddy at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution helped enormously by calculating and sending estimates, including animations, of sea surface height from AVISO satellite altimetry data. Marjorie Parmenter, also of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, provided editorial assistance for this report. Funding for the project is from the National Science Foundation, Grants OCE 0622825 and OCE 1232962. ii Cruise Report R/V Roger Revelle Cruise RR0901 10 January 2009 to 24 February 2009 Diapycnal and Isopycnal Mixing Experiment in the Southern Ocean DIMES Cruise US1 Deployment Cruise iii This page intentionally left blank iv Table of Contents Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................. ii 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 1.1 Objectives ..................................................................................................................1 Fig. 1.1.1. Neutral density at 105°W from WOCE Section P18 ..................................1 2. Cruise Narrative .............................................................................................................2 2.1. Underway Measurements .......................................................................................2 Table 2.1.1. Underway Data Streams ...........................................................................2 2.2. Mooring Deployments .............................................................................................2 Fig. 2.2.1. Cruise track and operations .........................................................................3 2.3. Front Identification .................................................................................................3 Fig. 2.3.1. Absolute Dynamic Topography (ADT) Map ..............................................4 Fig. 2.3.2. XBT profiles from north and south of the Polar Front ................................5 2.4. CTD/ADCP Line .....................................................................................................5 Fig. 2.4.1. Absolute Dynamic Topography (ADT) along 105oW ................................6 Fig. 2.4.2. Neutral density and zonal geostrophic velocity sections ............................7 2.5. XBT Series ...............................................................................................................7 Fig. 2.5.1. Temperature profiles from 50oS to 58oS along 105oW ...............................8 Fig. 2.5.2. Location of XBT drops ...............................................................................9 2.6. RAFOS Deployments ..............................................................................................9 2.7. Surface Drifters .......................................................................................................9 2.8. Medical Evacuation - End of Leg 1 ........................................................................9 2.9. Tracer Release .......................................................................................................10 Table 2.9.1. Injection Statistics ..................................................................................10 Fig. 2.9.1. Tracer injection and sampling tracks ........................................................11 2.10. Shearmeter Floats ...............................................................................................11 2.11. EM-APEX Floats .................................................................................................12 2.12. CTD Box Survey around the Tracer Patch ......................................................12 Fig. 2.12.1. CTD stations and geostrophic velocity at 1500 dbar ..............................13 Fig. 2.12.2. Geostrophic surface velocity ...................................................................14 2.13. Surveying of the Tracer Patch ...........................................................................14 v Fig. 2.13.1. Tracer concentration versus height; CTD Cast 38 ..................................15 Fig. 2.13.2. Sampling Array .......................................................................................16 Fig. 2.13.3. Time series of temperature from the sampling array ..............................17 Fig. 2.13.4. Tracer profiles from sampler Tows 1, 2, and 3 .......................................18 Fig. 2.13.5. Tracer transects from the 50-chamber sampler .......................................19 Fig. 2.13.6. Mean tracer concentration as a function of σ1500 ....................................20 Fig. 2.13.7. Mean depth as a function of σ1500 ...........................................................20 Fig. 2.13.8. Mean tracer profile as a function of depth ..............................................21 2.14. Initial Diapycnal Distribution of the Tracer Patch ..........................................21 Table 2.14.1. Statistics of the Initial Tracer Distribution ...........................................22 2.15. CTD Calibrations ................................................................................................22 2.16. Cruise Time Line .................................................................................................22 3. Meteorological and Surface Seawater Measurements ..............................................23 3.1. Location of the Instruments .................................................................................23 Fig. 3.1.1. R/V Roger Revelle portside plot ...............................................................23 3.2. Description of the Sensors ....................................................................................23 Table 3.2.1. Meteorological and Underway Seawater System Sensor Specifications .............................................................................28 Table 3.2.2. Surface Seawater Sensors .......................................................................29 Table 3.2.3. Meteorological Sensors ..........................................................................29 3.3. Data Processing and Results ................................................................................30 Fig. 3.3.1. Barometric Pressure, Wind Speed, and Direction at the MET mast, 12–21 Jan 2009 .........................................................................................32 Fig. 3.3.2. True Wind Speed at the MET and Main masts, 12 Jan–20 Feb 2009 .......32 Fig. 3.3.3. True Wind Direction at the MET and Main masts, 12 Jan–20 Feb 2009 .33 Fig. 3.3.4. Air Temperature at the MET mast and with the RH module, 12 Jan–20 Feb 2009 ..................................................................................33 Fig. 3.3.5. Air Temperature and Relative Humidity at the MET mast, 12–25 Jan 2009 .........................................................................................34 Fig. 3.3.6. Dew Point and Precipitation at the MET mast, 12–20 Jan 2009 ..............35 Fig. 3.3.7. Long and Short wave radiation records, 12–25 Jan 2009 .........................36 Fig. 3.3.8. Flow rates in TSG #1 and #2, 12 Jan–20 Feb 2009 ..................................37 vi Fig. 3.3.9. Surface Temperature measured in TSG #1 and #2, 12 Jan–20 Feb 2009 .................................................................................37 Fig. 3.3.10. Surface Salinity measured in TSG #1 and #2, 12 Jan–20 Feb 2009 .......38 Fig. 3.3.11. Temperature and Salinity from the CTD at 4 m minus SST and SSS from TSG #1 .............................................................................38 Fig. 3.3.12. Surface Temperature, Surface Salinity, and σt from TSG #1, 12–25 Jan 2009 .......................................................................................39 Fig. 3.3.13. Surface Temperature recorded at TSG #1 along the ship’s track ...........40 Fig. 3.3.14. Surface Salinity derived from TSG #1 along the ship’s track ................40 Fig. 3.3.15. O2, O2 Saturation, Chl, and Surface PAR, 12–25 Jan 2009 ....................41 3.4. Guide to Underway Data and Processing Software ...........................................41 4. Hull Mounted Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCPs) ..................................43 4.1. RDI 150 kHz Narrowband ADCP .......................................................................43
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nearshore Benthic Habitat Mapping Based On
    Article Nearshore Benthic Habitat Mapping Based on Multi-Frequency, Multibeam Echosounder Data Using a Combined Object-Based Approach: A Case Study from the Rowy Site in the Southern Baltic Sea Lukasz Janowski 1,*, Karolina Trzcinska 1, Jaroslaw Tegowski 1, Aleksandra Kruss 1, Maria Rucinska-Zjadacz 1 and Pawel Pocwiardowski 2 1 Institute of Oceanography, University of Gdansk, al. Marszalka Pilsudskiego 46, 81-378 Gdynia, Poland; [email protected] (K.T.); [email protected] (J.T.); [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (M.R.-Z.) 2 NORBIT-Poland Sp. z o.o., al. Niepodleglosci 813-815/24, 81-810 Sopot, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +48-58-523-6820 Received: 29 October 2018; Accepted: 4 December 2018; Published: 7 December 2018 Abstract: Recently, the rapid development of the seabed mapping industry has allowed researchers to collect hydroacoustic data in shallow, nearshore environments. Progress in marine habitat mapping has also helped to distinguish the seafloor areas of varied acoustic properties. As a result of these new developments, we have collected a multi-frequency, multibeam echosounder dataset from the valuable nearshore environment of the southern Baltic Sea using two frequencies: 150 kHz and 400 kHz. Despite its small size, the Rowy area is characterized by diverse habitat conditions and the presence of red algae, unique on the Polish coast of the Baltic Sea. This study focused on the utilization of multibeam bathymetry and multi-frequency backscatter data to create reliable maps of the seafloor.
    [Show full text]
  • Seabed Mapping Using Multibeam Sonar and Combining with Former Bathymetric Data a Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School Of
    SEABED MAPPING USING MULTIBEAM SONAR AND COMBINING WITH FORMER BATHYMETRIC DATA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY FATİH FURKAN GÜRTÜRK IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING DECEMBER 2015 ii Approval of the thesis: SEABED MAPPING USING MULTIBEAM SONAR AND COMBINING WITH FORMER BATHYMETRIC DATA submitted by FATİH FURKAN GÜRTÜRK in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Gülbin Dural Ünver _______________ Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Gönül Turhan Sayan _______________ Head of Department, Electrical and Electronics Engineering Prof. Dr. Kemal Leblebicioğlu _______________ Supervisor, Electrical and Electronics Engineering Dept., METU Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. Tolga Çiloğlu _______________ Electrical and Electronics Engineering Dept., METU Prof. Dr. Kemal Leblebicioğlu _______________ Electrical and Electronics Engineering Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Çağatay Candan _______________ Electrical and Electronics Engineering Dept., METU Assist. Prof. Dr. Elif Vural _______________ Electrical and Electronics Engineering Dept., METU Assist. Dr. Yakup Özkazanç _______________ Electrical and Electronics Engineering Dept., Hacettepe Uni. Date: _______________ iii I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Fatih Furkan, Gürtürk Signature : iv ABSTRACT SEABED MAPPING USING MULTIBEAM SONAR AND COMBINING WITH FORMER BATHYMETRIC DATA Gürtürk, Fatih Furkan M.S., Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Supervisor: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling the Effect of Oceanic Internal Waves on the Accuracy of Multibeam Echosounders
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping 6-2010 Modeling the Effect of Oceanic Internal Waves on the Accuracy of Multibeam Echosounders Travis Hamilton University of New Brunswick Jonathan Beaudoin University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/ccom Part of the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Hamilton, Travis and Beaudoin, Jonathan, "Modeling the Effect of Oceanic Internal Waves on the Accuracy of Multibeam Echosounders" (2010). Canadian Hydrographic Conference (CHC). 784. https://scholars.unh.edu/ccom/784 This Conference Proceeding is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Modeling the effect of oceanic internal waves on the accuracy of multibeam echosounders Travis John Hamilton(1) and Jonathan Beaudoin(1), (2) (1) Ocean Mapping Group, University of New Brunswick (2) now at Centre for Coastal and Ocean Mapping, University of New Hampshire Abstract When ray bending corrections are applied to multibeam echosounder (MBES) data, it is assumed that the varying layers of sound speed lie along horizontally stratified planes. In many areas internal waves occur at the interface where the water’s density changes abruptly (a pycnocline), this density gradient is often associated with a strong gradient in sound speed (a velocline).
    [Show full text]
  • Backscatter Measurements by Seafloor-Mapping Sonars Guidelines and Recommendations
    Backscatter measurements by seafloor-mapping sonars Guidelines and Recommendations A collective report by members of the GeoHab Backscatter Working Group Editors Xavier Lurton and Geoffroy Lamarche Authors: Xavier Lurton1 Geoffroy Lamarche2 Craig Brown3 Vanessa Lucieer4 Glen Rice5 Alexandre Schimel6 Tom Weber7 Affiliations 1 – IFREMER, Centre Bretagne, Unité Navires et Systèmes Embarqués, ZI Pointe du Diable, CS 10070, 29280 PLOUZANE, France 2 - National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241, New Zealand 3 – Applied Oceans Research, Nova Scotia Community College, Waterfront Campus, 80 Mawiomi Place, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B2Y 0A5, Canada 4 – Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia 5 5 – National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, Center for Coastal & Ocean Mapping/Joint Hydrographic Center, 24 Colovos Road, Durham, NH, 03824 6 – Deakin University, Warrnambool Campus, PO Box 423, Warrnambool, VIC 3280, Australia 7 – Center for Coastal & Ocean Mapping/Joint Hydrographic Center; 24 Colovos Road, Durham, NH, 03824 Corresponding authors Xavier Lurton <[email protected]> Geoffroy Lamarche <[email protected]> Assistant Erin Heffron QPS US, 104 Congress Street Suite 304 Portsmouth NH, 03801 [email protected] Page | ii Acknowledgements We are hugely grateful to Erin Heffron, QPS, for the support and help she provided throughout the process of the BSWG, including organizing video-conferences, managing the Dropbox, keeping minutes, and proofreading all the chapters. A massive task that she undertook with class and good humor at all time. Our recognition goes to the authors of the six chapters, and in particular to the first authors: Tom Weber, Vanessa Lucieer, Craig Brown, Glen Rice and Alexandre Schimel.
    [Show full text]
  • Set up and Configuration of the Imagenex Dt101xi Dt102xi.Pdf
    Technical Manual Set up and Configuration of the Imagenex DT101Xi / DT102Xi Multibeam Echosounder Imagenex Technology Corp. 209-1875 Broadway Street Port Coquitlam, BC Canada V3C 4Z1 Telephone: +1 (604) 944-8248 Fax: +1 (604) 944-8249 [email protected] www.imagenex.com DT101Xi / DT102Xi Multibeam Echosounder Document Number 430-041-01 Date 29 October 2020 Revision 01 For Issue Prepared by Imagenex Technology Corp. Author Tarry Waterson Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Document Identification ................................................................................................................. 5 1.2. System Overview .......................................................................................................................... 5 1.3. Document Overview ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.4. Reference Documents .................................................................................................................. 5 1.4.1. Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................ 6 2. System Description ........................................................................................................................... 7 2.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MATTHEW HOMMEYER USF College of Marine Science, 140 7Th Ave S, St
    MATTHEW HOMMEYER USF College of Marine Science, 140 7th Ave S, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 | (813) 277-8313 | [email protected] EDUCATION Middlebury College (Middlebury, VT) Bachelor of Arts 2002 Major: Geology Thesis: “Global climate change during the Late Quaternary as recorded in the Svenner Channel, Prydz Bay, East Antarctica” PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE University of South Florida, College of Marine Science Research Engineer 2019 – Present Project Scientist 2015 – 2018 Responsible for planning and execution of all marine survey operations for multiple projects in the Gulf of Mexico and the Bahamas funded by National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Naval Research, and private industry partners. Sailed as chief scientist on thirteen research cruises and as lead multibeam scientist on nine research cruises. Holguin, Fahan & Associates / URS Corporation / Terra Environmental Services Assistant Geologist / Geologist / Senior Scientist 2003 – 2015 Experience in environmental assessment and engineering, complex field investigations, remediation design and implementation, and strategic analysis. Fugro West Marine Survey Technician 2002 – 2003 Performed data acquisition and management for geophysical surveying and mapping projects in both marine and terrestrial environments throughout California and Baja, Mexico. Experience with multibeam echosounder, sidescan sonar, CHIRP sonar, shallow seismic surveys, differential GPS surveys, submarine camera systems, piston coring, vibracoring, and towed instrument arrays. Middlebury College Sidescan Sonar Operator 1999 – 2000 Shipboard data acquisition and management for Lake Champlain Sidescan Survey project. Additional experience with ADCPs, SOFAR/RAFOS floats, and submarine camera systems. SELECTED PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Xie, Surui, J. Law, R. Russell, T. H. Dixon, C. Lembke, R. Malservisi, M. Rodgers, G.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncalibrated Multibeam Echosounder Capabilities for Fish Schools Measuring and Tracking
    2020 IMEKO TC-19 International Workshop on Metrology for the Sea Naples, Italy, October 5-7, 2020 Uncalibrated Multibeam Echosounder capabilities for fish schools measuring and tracking. An application in the nearby of an Adriatic offshore structure Annalisa Minelli1, Anna Nora Tassetti1, Gianna Fabi1 1 CNR-IRBIM, Largo Fiera della Pesca 2, 60125 Ancona (Italy), [email protected]*, [email protected], [email protected] Abstract – This work aims to investigate the potential them, taking into account their limitations and potentials. capabilities of an uncalibrated Multibeam In this context, this research aims to repurpose a Echosounder (MBES) in fish school detection, hydrographic MBES to investigate an offshore platform reporting an experience regarding an offshore gas and its habitat, quantifying and characterizing at best fish platform in the Adriatic Sea. If, on one hand, the Split- school assemblages and considering expected species in beam Echosounder technology is traditionally used for such an environment. Capabilities and limitations of the the purpose of biomass evaluation, on the other hand, uncalibrated MBES in fish schools’ characterization and recent improvements in Multibeam Echosounder measuring are addressed, as well as issues tied to the (MBES) technologies and advancing in water column structure itself (e.g. sound wave reflection and refraction data processing have made possible to detect schools on platforms’ poles) and the planning of the survey (i.e. and obtain some relevant metric information, with the overestimation of the fish presence by detecting the same advantage that a wide surrounding environment could school more than one time). be quickly surveyed. The possible results that can be Moreover, a replicable MBES survey and data obtained with this technology, strength points and processing is described, and assumptions on targets’ weaknesses are presented in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Ices S Sym Mposiu Um
    ICES SYMPOSIUM MARINE ECOSYSTEM ACCOUSTICS – OBSERVING THE OCEAN INTERIOR IN SUPPORT OF INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT 25-28 MAY 2015 NANTES, FRANCE someacoustics.sciencesconf.org BOOK OF ABSTRACTS We thank the following commercial sponsors for their support: Symposium Overview Marine ecosystem acoustics is an approach that utilizes acoustics as the primary tool for understanding, assessing, and monitoring marine ecosystems. The approach holds the potential of becoming a principal contributor to operational Ecosystem Based Management (EBM). It is part of the strategy to move towards integrated management within ICES, but also elsewhere. The potential of marine ecosystem acoustics cannot be realized without systematic cross disciplinary interactions and cooperation within fields such as fisheries acoustics, physics, engineering, biology, oceanography, ecology, and ecosystem modelling. The ability of acoustics to resolve ecosystem processes at the spatio-temporal scales at which they occur fosters improved and new ecosystem understanding, such as quantification of physical forcing and biological responses, and patterns in prey-predator distribution and interactions, which are a prerequisite for EBM. The primary aim of this symposium is to bring together scientists and ideas from various fields to facilitate and catalyze interdisciplinary interactions with acoustics as the central tool to further the development of marine ecosystem acoustics. The Symposium will review and discuss recent developments in acoustic methods and technologies used to characterize and manage marine and freshwater ecosystems. Particular emphasis will be placed on technologies used to measure diverse aspects of the aquatic environment, techniques for data analysis, and the integration of multiple data sets to elucidate functional ecological relationships and processes. Contemporary challenges and future directions of these objectives will be identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Processing of High-Rate, High-Density Multibeam Echosounder Data
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping 6-2003 Automatic Processing of High-Rate, High-Density Multibeam Echosounder Data Brian R. Calder University of New Hampshire, Durham, [email protected] Larry A. Mayer University of New Hampshire, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/ccom Part of the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation B. R. Calder and L. A. Mayer, ‘Automatic processing of high-rate, high-density multibeam echosounder data’, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, vol. 4, no. 6, p. n/a–n/a, Jun. 2003. This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Technical Brief Geochemistry 3 Volume 4, Number 6 Geophysics 11 June 2003 1048, doi:10.1029/2002GC000486 GeosystemsG G ISSN: 1525-2027 AN ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF THE EARTH SCIENCES Published by AGU and the Geochemical Society Automatic processing of high-rate, high-density multibeam echosounder data B. R. Calder and L. A. Mayer Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping and Joint Hydrographic Center, University of New Hampshire, 24 Colovos Road, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USA ([email protected]; [email protected]) [1] Multibeam echosounders (MBES) are currently the best way to determine the bathymetry of large regions of the seabed with high accuracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Technology Eric Haun [email protected] Reporter with You Anywhere! Contributing Editors Capt
    March 2016 MARINE White TECHNOLOGY Papers REPORTER A special content edition of MTR Oceanographic edition Photo credit: Dr. Andreas Muenchow Associate Professor University of Delaware WP MTR Cover February 2016.indd Version1.indd 1 4/11/2016 3:33:32 PM #1 Layout (1-15).indd 1A 4/11/2016 9:18:23 AM MTR White Papers / No. 1 Th e Lead Contents 2 Teledyne Answers the Call of the Running Tide Working together, leading oceanographic companies strive to create an integrated customer experience By Peter Spain Ph.D., Teledyne RD Instruments Data Collection and Processing Photo credit: Dr. Andreas Muenchow Associate Professor University of Delaware Andreas Muenchow Associate Professor University of Delaware Photo credit: Dr. www.marinetechnologynews.com NEW YORK 10 BAS monitoring waters under largest ice 118 E. 25th St., New York, NY 10010 Tel: (212) 477-6700; Fax: (212) 254-6271 shelf in Antarctica FLORIDA 215 NW 3rd St., Boynton Beach, FL 33435 By: Margaret McKerron Tel: (561) 732-4368; Fax: (561) 732-6984 PUBLISHER John C. O’Malley [email protected] Associate Publisher & Editor Gregory R. Trauthwein [email protected] Web Editor Take Marine Technology Eric Haun [email protected] Reporter with you anywhere! Contributing Editors Capt. Edward Lundquist, USN (Ret.) Claudio Paschoa William Stoichevski ...well almost anywhere. Production Manager Irina Tabakina [email protected] Production & Graphic Design Nicole Ventimiglia [email protected] Manager, Public Relations Mark O’Malley [email protected] Manager, Information Technology Services Vladimir Bibik [email protected] CIRCULATION Kathleen Hickey [email protected] Marine TechNews ADVERTISING Vice President, Sales and Marketing available on: Rob Howard [email protected] Tel: (561) 732-4368 • Fax: (561) 732-6984 Advertising Sales Manager Lucia M.
    [Show full text]
  • Backscattering from a Sandy Seabed Measured by a Calibrated Multibeam Echosounder in the 190–400 Khz Frequency Range
    Marine Geophysical Research (2018) 39:105–120 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11001-018-9350-y ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER Backscattering from a sandy seabed measured by a calibrated multibeam echosounder in the 190–400 kHz frequency range Gorm Wendelboe1 Received: 2 July 2017 / Accepted: 16 March 2018 / Published online: 2 April 2018 © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract A SeaBat T50 calibration that combines measurements in a test tank with data from numerical models is presented. The calibration is assessed with data obtained from a series of tests conducted over a sandy seabed outside the harbor of Santa Barbara, California (April 2016). The tests include different tone-burst durations, sound pressure levels, and receive gains S S in order to verify that the estimated seabed backscattering strength ( b) is invariant to sonar settings. Finally, b-estimates ◦ ◦ obtained in the frequency range from 190 kHz in steps of 10 kHz up to 400 kHz, and for grazing angles from 20 up to 90 ◦ in bins of width 5 , are presented. The results are compared with results found in the literature. Keywords Multibeam echosounder calibration · Backscattering strength · Multifrequency Introduction Between 2011 and 2016 efforts have been made to use the MBES for the estimation of the seafloor scattering strength In this paper, scattering strength (Sb) refers to the backscat- (Wendelboe et al. 2012). This paper presents how the cali- tering strength from the seabed. During the last 2–3 decades, bration has been made, and results from tests and verifica- the number of multibeam echosounders (MBES) for bathy- tions from subsequent field trials are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Results from Developments in the Use of a Scanning Sonar to Support Diving Operations from a Rescue Ship
    remote sensing Article Results from Developments in the Use of a Scanning Sonar to Support Diving Operations from a Rescue Ship Artur Grz ˛adziel Department of Navigation and Hydrography, Faculty of Navigation and Naval Weapons, Polish Naval Academy, 81-127 Gdynia, Poland; [email protected] Received: 31 January 2020; Accepted: 17 February 2020; Published: 20 February 2020 Abstract: In recent years, widespread use of scanning sonars for acoustic imaging of the seabed surface can be observed. These types of sonars are mainly used with tripods or special booms, or are mounted onboard remotely operated or unmanned vehicles. Typical scanning sonar applications include search and recovery operations, imaging of underwater infrastructure, and scour monitoring. The use of these sonars is often limited to shallow waters. Diver teams or underwater remotely operated vehicles (ROV) are commonly used to inspect shipwrecks, port wharfs, and ship hulls. However, reduced underwater visibility, submerged debris, and extreme water depths can limit divers’ capabilities. In this paper, a novel, nonstandard technique for use of a scanning sonar is proposed. The new application for scanning sonar technology is a practical solution developed on the Polish Navy’s search and rescue ship “Lech.” To verify the effectiveness of the proposed technique, the author took part in four different studies carried out in the southeastern Baltic Sea. The tests were performed using the MS 1000 scanning sonar. The results demonstrate that the proposed technique has the potential to provide detailed sonar images of the seabed and underwater objects before the descent of divers. The divers get acquainted with the underwater situation, which undoubtedly increases the safety of the entire operation.
    [Show full text]