A Commitment to Tolerance Morris Dees Aims at an Inclusive America

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Commitment to Tolerance Morris Dees Aims at an Inclusive America 2005 ConventionSTATE BAR OF ARIZONA ANNUAL A Commitment to Tolerance Morris Dees Aims at an Inclusive America BY TIM EIGO The State Bar Convention in Tucson was the occasion of a visit with Morris Dees, the co-Founder of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Dees has committed decades to the growth of the center, which began as a small civil rights law firm and today is known around the world for its legal victories against white supremacists, its tolerance education programs and its online tracking of hate groups. Morris Dees spoke with us immediately after his keynote address at the Bar luncheon. ARIZONA ATTORNEY: Just this past tary film about Emmett Till, and sup- sometimes literally. Does the reopen- month, the body of Emmett Till was posedly the filmmaker has found peo- ing of cases like these cause more dan- exhumed and the murder case ple who are willing to come forward ger for the center? reopened in Mississippi. What do you and say that more than the two people make of that? who were originally tried were DEES: We don’t get any threats involved. because of these cases. The Klan is a MORRIS DEES: There have been a The autopsy, I assume, is just a due shadow of itself, and nobody will number of successfully opened cases diligence thing on the part of the pros- come after us simply because they’re and successful prosecutions. One is ecutor in order to see if there’s some trying an old Klan leader over in going on now down in Mississippi— evidence. It’s hard to see to me how Mississippi. But we do get on a lot of Edgar Ray Killen—an 80-year-old an autopsy could prove anything other talk shows because we can put the man is being tried [and since convict- than he was brutally murdered. Most whole “how Mississippi was in the ed of manslaughter for the 1964 of these old cases come from witness- 1950s and 1960s” in context for killings of civil rights workers James es, who overheard the killer brag today’s listeners who weren’t born Chaney, Michael Schwerner and about what they did. That’s how most then. Andrew Goodman]. of them have been convicted. I think investigative reporters have AZAT: Before coming to the law, you done a good job unearthing witnesses AZAT: The Southern Poverty Law were a successful book publisher and to these events. There was a documen- Center has been under fire before— marketer. And it was in George 56 ARIZONA ATTORNEY SEPTEMBER 2005 www.myazbar.org Meeting Morris Dees McGovern’s presidential campaign that you were one of the first to use multi-page solicitation letters. Did that work help you when you did trial work in being persuasive to juries? Do peo- ple want more information rather than less? DEES: You know, it would take about two hours to give you the 50-cent short course in direct marketing. Like Thomas Jefferson said, “Please excuse this eight-page letter I wrote you, but I don’t have time to write you a short- er one.” There is something to that. Sometimes a one-page letter is quite appropriate. On the other hand, if I were trying to convince you to buy a Volvo, you might look at all 30 pages of the man- ual. Some people just open the door and smell the new car and they’ve got a preconceived idea; the first para- graph of a long letter gets that person. But then if somebody wants to look at the last page of the tech manual to see what the gear ratio in the transmission is, that’s why you have a long manual. It’s not that long letters turn you on or off, it’s just that they add more information for people who need more of the story. AZAT: You’ve admired Clarence Darrow for saying people “should focus on what is agitating the world at the time.” But has the center always agitated ahead of the curve? DEES: It’s hard to know. Some of the things we do are just traditional civil rights cases. Our litigation work right now I would say is not ahead of the curve. It’s just out there where there’s a great need. We’re representing juve- niles in Mississippi and Alabama, because the juvenile justice system is atrocious. They lock them up in two prisons away from their homes; we just got through winning a big victory abolishing those two institutions and setting up county systems. But I think our work tracking hate groups was way ahead of the curve. We started that in 1980, and pretty much people thought, “You can’t real- ly believe the Klan would lynch some- www.myazbar.org SEPTEMBER 2005 ARIZONA ATTORNEY 57 2005 ConventionSTATE BAR OF ARIZONA ANNUAL body today,” which they did shortly have guessed that people would not DEES: Everybody’s coming from a after we started. want to hear the message in 2005? place in life. They might have a good We decided to set up a group reason to think why they think. And I [Klanwatch, now called The DEES: There are ebbs and floes in this think the challenge is to try to let them Intelligence Project] that would track whole issue. There’s a lot of racism on know how it makes you feel. these hate groups. It turned to be behalf of blacks, too. We’ve filed sev- I think the worst thing going on there are hundreds of them. eral reverse discrimination cases; I today is the influence of the religious We also have a migrant justice proj- think we may have filed the first one right on teachers. They go to the same ect. The federal government—Legal in the country. What’s right is right. fundamentalist church like everybody Services—can’t rep- else in their commu- resent migrants in nity. And they come class-action lawsuits. I think the worst thing going on back and instill So we got some of some of those theo- the best lawyers today is the influence of the logical values in kids together and set up a religious right on teachers. that are probably group, and we’re try- good for some liv- ing to go after the ing habits but may pine tree planting industry, which is There’s a lot of systemic built-in not be good from an educational one of the biggest rip-offs. These are bias around the country. Blacks ands standpoint—a lot of authoritarian atti- legal workers. They come in on work whites are treated differently in terms tudes formed from people who look at permits, and they’re supposed to be of how much identification you need some this as always right. paying them $600, $700 a week, but to show when you use a credit card, they pay them about $200 a week, and how many pieces of jewelry they’ll put AZAT: We hear a lot lately about they’re doing it through a scam we up on a table for a white looking at it dangers to judicial independence. think we’ve uncovered. We’ve filed versus a black. You’ve tried cases in many court- four lawsuits against four of the largest And the “Lakeeshas” don’t get the rooms; how important is judicial tree planters. same response to their job applica- independence to you? tions even though when they test it AZAT: When you started Klanwatch, and send out 5,000 identical job DEES: I’ve tried cases all over the not all the center staff thought it was a applications, they just change the United States, and I can’t remember good idea. names. One is Emily Grant, and one is going before trial judges who weren’t Lakeesha Washington; Lakeeshas get elected. And being elected, some- DEES: Some of the lawyers who came 50 percent fewer callbacks, even times they tend to think about what along there were well-intended and though the applications were voters think about them. well-meaning people, and they just absolutely identical. They simply My idea about judges wouldn’t came there for a different reason. They looked at the name and perceived that fly. I think that lawyers should be cer- thought it was a waste of resources, this person wasn’t as competent and tified as trial lawyers. And then they and maybe they didn’t see what we qualified. should be the judges; they can be a saw. But I think they’ve all changed That’s systemic bias, and people judge for three months, and then their minds since. It takes time to do are not even conscious of it. another gets to be the judge for three what you’re proving; we started the months. So lawyers would judge Klan program in 1980. AZAT: That’s where the center initia- themselves, and they wouldn’t be tive called Teaching for Tolerance appointed or elected. They simply AZAT: You’ve described a time when comes in? would be picked at random off a list you spoke about integration to your of qualified trial lawyers. It wouldn’t church congregation soon after the DEES: Yes. [For example,] it deals be a courthouse clique. church bombing that claimed the lives with gays and lesbians. It’s got to do The appeals court would be the of four girls, and the congregation with handicapped folks, who general- same way. You’d have a higher level walked out.
Recommended publications
  • 2016 Annual Report a Message from Morris Dees and Richard Cohen
    2016 ANNUAL REPORT A MESSAGE FROM MORRIS DEES AND RICHARD COHEN WE REDOUBLED OUR WORK TO FIGHT HATE Anti-Muslim hate groups almost tripled in and seek justice in 2016, a year in which the pres- number – an increase fueled by Trump’s incen- idential campaign of Donald Trump energized a diary rhetoric, including his campaign pledge to growing white nationalist movement and engulfed bar Muslims from entering the United States. the country in a wave of xenophobia that threat- • Our Teaching Tolerance project reported a ened to reverse years of progress. In the face of ris- sharp uptick in the bullying and intimidation of ing far-right extremism, we fought for our coun- children whose races, nationalities or religions try’s highest ideals – exposing those who brought were targeted during the campaign. The Trump hate into the mainstream, helping teachers push Effect, based on our survey of 2,000 educators, back against bias in the classroom, and standing garnered national headlines and alerted the up in the courts for the exploited and the abused. country to the alarming trend. A second, post- Prior to the election, we documented the wide- election survey of more than 10,000 educators spread harassment and bullying of minority chil- reinforced the findings. We responded by pro- dren caused by a campaign that vilified their fami- viding teachers with strategies and resources lies on the basis of race, ethnicity or religion. And to help children see through stereotypes and after it, we alerted the country to an outbreak of reject bigotry. violence and intimidation faced by members of • After the election, we documented a spike in minority groups and the LGBT community.
    [Show full text]
  • A True Deliverance: the Joan Little Case
    Michigan Law Review Volume 79 Issue 4 1981 A True Deliverance: The Joan Little Case Michigan Law Review Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Michigan Law Review, A True Deliverance: The Joan Little Case, 79 MICH. L. REV. 861 (1981). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol79/iss4/34 This Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. March 1981] Equality and Women~ Rights 861 A TRUE DELIVERANCE: THE JOAN LITTLE CASE. By Fred Har­ well. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 1980. Pp. x, 298. $10.95. During the early morning hours of August 27, 1974, Joan Little, a black prisoner at the Beaufort County Jail in North Carolina, stabbed to death a white male jailer and fled the prison. Little claimed that she had acted in self-defense when the jailer sexually assaulted her. The prosecutor claims that the prisoner had lured the jailer into the cell as part of an escape plot. Little's defense became a cause celebre, attracting support from advocates of women's rights, civil rights, and prison reform. Ultimately, the jury acquitted Little of murder. However, it is this book's thesis that because the defense "failed in court to prove that Joan Little was not guilty, just as [the 862 Michigan Law Review [Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • January 17, 1979
    THE OAlL’f DIARY OF PRESlbENT JIMMY CARTER LOCATlOH THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON, D.C. TIME From 1 TO 6:00 ’ The President received a wake up call from the White House signal board operator. 1 - 6:28 I The President went to the Oval Office. I 8:14 i 8:19 The President talked with Secretary of Energy James R. I Schlesinger, Jr, I 8:15 1 8:29 The President met with his Assistant for National Security . Affairs, Zbigniew Brzezinski. 9:lO 1 9:25 The President met with his Assistant for Domestic Affairs and Policy, Stuart E. Eizenstat. I 9:47 : 9:43 The President talked with his Assistant, Hamilton Jordan. I 10:30 10:30 The President met to discuss SALT with: Senator John C. Stennis (D-Mississippi) Frank B. Moore, Aassistant for Congressional Liaison Mr. Brzezinski / li:l5 1 lli30 The President met to discuss the relation between transpor- tation deregulation and the upcoming Teamsters contract with: Representative James J. Howard (D-New Jersey) Brock Adams, Secretary of Transportation James C. Free, Special Assistant for iongressional Liaison 11:45 i 11:50 The president met with: I Morris Dees, Attorney, Southern Poverty Law Center, I I Montgomery, Alabama Mr. Jordan The President talked with the First Lady. The President went to the Roosevelt Room. The President participated in a luncheon meeting with members of the Domestic Policy Staff. Fcr a list of attendees, see APPENDIX "A." The President returned to the Ovai Office. The President returned to the second floor Residence. THE DAlLYf DIARY OF PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER DATE ttm.
    [Show full text]
  • S:\08-10-Bak\Media\Copy of Pr Deesaward.Html
    Skadden and The University of Alabama Announce the Winner of the Morris Dees Justice Award Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Affiliates and The University of Alabama School of Law announced today that United States District Judge William Wayne Justice, of the Eastern District of Texas, has been awarded the 2006 Morris Dees Justice Award. The award will be presented in New York on November 16, 2006. Today Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Affiliates and The University of Alabama School of Law announced that United States District Judge William Wayne Justice, of the Eastern District of Texas, has been selected as the winner of the 2006 Morris Dees Justice Award. Morris Dees will present the award during a reception at Skadden’s offices in New York on November 16, 2006. The Morris Dees Justice Award was created in 2006 by Skadden and The University of Alabama School of Law to honor Dees, an Alabama graduate, for his life-long devotion to public service. The award will be given annually to a lawyer who has devoted his or her career to serving the public interest and pursuing justice, and whose work has brought about positive change in the community, state or nation. The Selection Committee recognized Judge Justice for his life-long efforts to protect civil rights and safeguard constitution rights, including more than 30 years of service as a federal district court judge. His notable cases dealt with integration, prisoners’ rights, procedural due process, equal access to education, treatment of immigrants, dilution of voting rights and care for the mentally challenged.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Winner Arthur N. Read
    Farmworker Activist Wins 2007 Morris Dees Justice Award Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Affiliates and The University of Alabama School of Law announced today that Arthur N. Read, Esq., of Philadelphia, has been awarded the 2007 Morris Dees Justice Award. The award will be presented in New York on November 15, 2007. New York, NY (PRWEB) October 1, 2007 -- Arthur N. Read, General Counsel for Friends of Farmworkers, Inc., a legal services provider in Philadelphia, has been awarded the 2007 Morris Dees Justice Award. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Affiliates and The University of Alabama School of Law announced Mr. Read's honor today. Morris Dees will present the award during a reception at Skadden’s offices in New York on November 15, 2007. The Morris Dees Justice Award was created in 2006 by Skadden and The University of Alabama School of Law to honor Dees, an Alabama graduate, for his life-long devotion to public service. The award is given annually to a lawyer who has devoted his or her career to serving the public interest and pursuing justice, and whose work has brought about positive change in the community, state or nation. Last year’s winner was U.S. District Judge William Wayne Justice, of the Eastern District of Texas. The selection committee recognized Read for nearly 30 years of tireless, courageous, and effective representation of farmworkers and immigrants. Read was nominated by more than 20 organizations and individuals. As Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth Pedro A. Cortés noted in his supporting letter, “It is fitting that he be considered in the company of Morris Dees .
    [Show full text]
  • Morris Dees: More Than a Great Lawyer Published: 1:00 Am Mon, March 29, 2010 by DOUGLAS K
    Morris Dees: more than a great lawyer Published: 1:00 am Mon, March 29, 2010 By DOUGLAS K. SHEFF I recently had the privilege of introducing keynote speaker Morris Dees at the Massachusetts Bar Association's annual gala dinner. He reminded us all not only what can be accomplished through the law, but how the best of us within the profession are willing to sacrifice for the good of others. Dees, 74, made me proud to be a lawyer. Consider the following. In the 1950s, the South was not a terribly friendly place for minorities. Dees' father, however, provided him with a rare and commendable example to the contrary. He was a tenant farmer and worked alongside black workers daily. He would invite them into his home to sit at his table, unheard of in the South at the time. The elder Dees not only planted seeds in the earth but in his son as well. Dees received his law degree in 1960 from the University of Alabama but didn't focus much on the law just yet. Instead, he developed a direct-mail business that reached $15 million in sales – and that was in the '60s! Most would have continued along in life wealthy, happy and content. But not Dees. His past resurfaced with the rise of the civil rights movement. Federal legislation was passed but largely ignored in the South. Intolerance led to countless injustices and acts of violence. Dees was deeply affected when a bomb went off in a Birmingham Baptist church, killing four little girls. His requests for help were ignored, and he was, himself, ostracized from his community.
    [Show full text]
  • |||GET||| the Lynching the Epic Courtroom Battle That Brought Down the Klan 1St Edition
    THE LYNCHING THE EPIC COURTROOM BATTLE THAT BROUGHT DOWN THE KLAN 1ST EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE Laurence Leamer | 9780062458360 | | | | | The Lynching: The Epic Courtroom Battle That Brought Down the Klan (Paperback) Aug 15, Rob rated it really liked it. Friend Reviews. Advanced Search. In Marchmembers of Klavern of the United Klans of America pondered how to lash out against a jury that refused to find a black bank robber guilty of shooting a white police officer. Gaines Award for Literary Excellence in for it. And also make the Klan responsible: "Whatever judgment you decide, I do hope you decide a judgment against me and everyone else involved. Good solid historical nonfiction, covers not only the lynching of Michel Donald, and the ensuing tribals, but also the history of the Civil Rights Movement, and the close, often personal relationships between Robert Shelton, and United Klans of America, George Wallace, and Morris Dees and the Southern Poverty Law Center. Morris Dees, the attorney in the civil suit against the Klan is a colorful character, almost fearless, The Lynching The Epic Courtroom Battle That Brought down the Klan 1st edition, he started up The Southern Poverty Law Center, which has done much to fight for rights of poor and victims of discrimination. There are lots of details about George Wallace that I was not aware of. Want to Read saving…. In addition to telling a gripping and consequential story, Laurence Leamer chronicles the KKK and its activities in the second half the twentieth century, and illuminates its lingering effect on race relations in America today.
    [Show full text]
  • Sponsorship Options
    March 30, 2017 7:30 – 8:45 a.m. Sheraton Seattle Hotel KEYNOTE SPEAKER: Sponsorship2017 SPONSORSHIP OPTIONS 2/5 DIAMOND $10,000 • Display of Sponsor banner above the main stage at the Breakfast, plus special spotlight logo display and voice recognition from podium. • Sponsor’s promotional/marketing materials displayed in lobby. • Two full tables (20 seats) at the Breakfast for you and your guests. • Eight invitations to the exclusive VIP Reception with Keynote Speaker, Morris Dees, the evening before the Breakfast. • Featured on website, Bar Bulletin ad and other media. PLATINUM $5,000 • Special spotlight logo display, logo recognition in Breakfast program and on big screens and voice recognition from podium. • One and a half tables (15 seats) at the Breakfast for you and your guests. • Six invitations to the exclusive VIP Reception with Keynote Speaker, Morris Dees, the evening before the Breakfast. • Featured on website, Bar Bulletin ad and other media. GOLD PLUS $3,000 SILVER PLUS $1,500 BRONZE PLUS $1,000 • Gold recognition PLUS: • Silver recognition PLUS: • Bronze recognition PLUS: • One full table (10 seats) at the • One full table (10 seats) at the • One full table (10 seats) at the Breakfast for you and your guests. Breakfast for you and your guests. Breakfast for you and your guests. GOLD $2,500 SILVER $1,000 BRONZE $500 • Logo recognition in Breakfast • Name recognition in Breakfast • Name recognition in Breakfast program and on big screens and program and on big screens. program and on big screens. voice recognition from podium. • Two invitations to the exclusive VIP • One invitation to the exclusive VIP • Four invitations to the exclusive VIP Reception with Keynote Speaker, Reception with Keynote Speaker, Reception with Keynote Speaker, Morris Dees, the evening before Morris Dees, the evening before Morris Dees, the evening before the Breakfast.
    [Show full text]
  • Table Captain Packets
    March 30, 2017 7:30 – 8:45 a.m. Sheraton Seattle Hotel KEYNOTE SPEAKER: Table Captain 2017 2/6 March 30, 2017 7:30 – 8:45 a.m. Sheraton Seattle Hotel 1400 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101 KEYNOTE SPEAKER: Morris Dees Dear Fantastic Table Captain, Thank you for agreeing to host a table for ten at the King County Bar Foundation’s Breakfast With Champions. We appreciate your commitment to the minority law student scholarships and the pro bono legal safety net we provide. By hosting a table at our annual breakfast, you are helping to ensure that thousands of people will continue to receive legal advice, consultation and direct representation when they need it and before they find themselves immersed in more devastating consequences. You are also helping us in our efforts to increase the ethnic diversity of the courtrooms and law offices of King County. Todd R. Bowers Breakfast With Champions Committee Chair KEYNOTE SPEAKER 2017 MORRIS DEES INTERNATIONALLY-RENOWNED CIVIL RIGHTS ATTORNEY Southern Poverty Law Center co-founder and chief trial attorney Morris Dees was born in 1936 at Shorter, Alabama, the son of cotton farmers. As a young boy he worked those fields, witnessing social and economic deprivation first-hand, and Jim Crow treatment at its worst. Dees first launched a private law practice in 1960, and would win a series of groundbreaking civil rights cases that helped integrate government and public institutions. Dees would go on to found the SPLC in Montgomery, Alabama in 1971, along with his law partner, Joseph J. Levin, Jr. and the late civil rights leader, Julian Bond.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hate Connection: a Book Review Essay
    North Dakota Law Review Volume 69 Number 2 Article 4 1993 The Hate Connection: A Book Review Essay Stephen E. Rendahl Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Rendahl, Stephen E. (1993) "The Hate Connection: A Book Review Essay," North Dakota Law Review: Vol. 69 : No. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr/vol69/iss2/4 This Review is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Dakota Law Review by an authorized editor of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE HATE CONNECTION: A BOOK REVIEW ESSAY* DR. STEPHEN E. RENDAHL** The increasing interdependence of citizens in post-modern society requires greater tolerance of diversity than at any time in the history of civilization. No longer can ethnic groups, either by choice or by chance, remain isolated. Increased mobility, omni- present communication systems, affirmative action, civil rights leg- islation and other factors allow, and even compel, citizens to interact with others outside their social group. The post-modern world requires a tolerance for diversity and dictates behaviors that effectively deal with interdependence. Yet, there are forces that resist these changes. Ethnic vio- lence occurs in the former Yugoslavia, neo-Nazi groups expand in Germany, anti-Semitism resurges in the former Soviet Union, and hate crimes become more prevalent in the United States. These problems have a long history throughout the civilized world, but they have become more conspicuous since the post-modern world demands increased intolerance of intolerance.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Commissioner Gail Heriot
    COMMISSIONERS’ STATEMENTS 259 Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Gail Heriot I voted against publishing this report in its present form. It needs work. Perhaps its most troubling aspect is its failure to acknowledge—much less address— many of the most serious issues relating to the enforcement of hate crimes laws. Among those issues are the large numbers of hoaxes and false alarms as well as the overbroad statutory definitions of “hate crime,” all of which may inflate the statistics. These things need to be discussed. I worry that these statistics may have given many Americans a false sense of how common hate crimes are.1 Also among the serious issues that need to be discussed is the potential for double jeopardy abuse. Not all hate crimes laws have this potential. It’s the federal statute—the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009—that does.2 Like all federal criminal statutes that duplicate what state criminal statutes already cover, that law makes it possible to re- prosecute defendants who have been acquitted in state court. But since hate crimes tend to cause emotions to run high, the danger of abuse is particularly acute.3 In the unusually limited time allotted to me to write this statement, I can discuss these issues only very briefly.4 They deserved much more extended treatment in this report. * * * * * Dr. Wilfred Reilly, a professor of political science at Kentucky State University, a historically black university, has studied the hate crimes phenomenon extensively.5 In his 2019 book, Hate Crime Hoax, he came to conclusions that will likely be unpopular in some quarters.
    [Show full text]
  • The SPLC's Teaching Tolerance
    The SPLC’s TEACHING TOLERANCE What Parents, Teachers, and Administrators Need to Know Navigating our educational “Teaching Tolerance” is a special project run by the system is one of the biggest chal- SPLC and is designed to infiltrate schools through lenges facing families all across radically progressive education resources. The SPLC’s America. We worry about where stated goal of Teaching Tolerance (TT) is to “eradi- our children go to school and cate intolerance.”1 We know that for the SPLC, the the quality of education they target is not “the intolerant” per se but those who do will receive. We wonder if they will be able to find a job or at- tend college upon graduation. Will our children be safe and respected at school? Will our values be reinforced, or at BC19J01 least tolerated, or will they be undermined? These wor- ries are compounded by the sense that America’s chil- dren are being educated The SPLC brands Christian beliefs about sexuality as “hate.” away from values held dear by previous generations: an appreciation for hard work, self-con- not share their liberal worldview. According to an trol, civic duty, and love of country and neighbor. executive at the SPLC, “[w]e are focused, whether people like it or not, on the radical right.”2 A former Parents are wise to be on guard and active in their Senior Fellow at the SPLC describes the purpose of children’s school, in contact with their teachers and the Center as not just a “hate monitoring” organi- administrators, and dedicated monitors of curricula zation, but in reality, “[o]ur aim in life is to destroy and textbooks.
    [Show full text]