DOCSLIB.ORG

Phillip Island Nature Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phillip Island Nature Park VEGETATION COMMUNITY SURVEY AND MAPPING OF THE PHILLIP ISLAND NATURE PARK REPORT BY GEOFF SUTTER AND JUDY DOWNE JUNE 2000 Arthur Rylah Phillip Island Institute NATURE PARK Flora, Fauna & Freshwater Research PARKS, FLORA AND FAUNA ARTHUR RYLAH INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 123 BROWN STREET (PO Box 137) HEIDELBERG VIC. 3084. TEL: (03) 9450 8600 FAX: (03) 9450 8799 (ABN: 90719052204) Natural Resources and Environment AGRICULTURE • RESOURCES • CONSERVATION • LAND MANAGEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................... :............................................................................................... 1 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................. 5 2 IN"TRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Background ................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Project Aims ................................................................................................................ 6 2.3 Location and Size ........................................................................................................ 6 2.4 Terminology .................................................................. :............................................. 6 2.4.1 Ecological Vegetation Classes .......................................................................................... 6 2.4.2 Floristic Community ......................................................................................................... 7 2.4.3 Weeds ............................................................................................................................... 7 2.4.4 Victorian rare or threatened species (VROTS) ................................................ :................ 7 2.4.5 Codes used for mapping that do not apply to vegetation communities ............................ 8 2.5 Nomenclature .............................................................................................................. 9 i' 3 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND DEVELOPMENT ......................................................... 9 J 3.1 Methods ....................................................................................................................... 9 3 .1.1 Collation and evaluation of existing data ......................................................................... 9 3 .1.2 Supplementary data collection .......................................................................................... 9 3 .1.3 Floristic Analysis ............................................................................................................ 10 3 .1.4 Determination of Floristic communities and EVCs ........................................................ 10 3.1.5 Mapping ofEVCs ........................................................................................................... 10 3.1.6 Weed index ..................................................................................................................... 11 3 .1. 7 Polygon reliability Code ................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Assessment of Vegetation Condition ........................................................................ 12 3 .2.1 Summerland Peninsula ................................................................................................... 12 3.2.2 Ventnor Koala Reserve ................................................................................................... 13 3.2.3 Koala Conservation Centre and Five Ways Reserve ...................................................... 13 3.2.4 Oswin Roberts Reserve .................................................................................................. 13 3.2.5 Rhyll Wetland Reserve ................................................................................................... 13 3.2.6 Rowell Wetland Reserve .................· ............................................................................... 14 3.2.7 Conservation Hill Reserve and Rhyll Inlet and Observation Point ................................ 14 3.2.8 Churchill Island, Fishers Land and Swan Bay, Denne Bight.. ........................................ 14 3.2.9 Newhaven Wetland ........................................................................................................ 15 3.2.10 Cape Woolamai. ............................................................................................................. 15 3.2.11 Ventnor Coast. ................................................................................................................ 16 3.2.12 I<ennon Head to Pyramid Rock ...................................................................................... 16 3 .2.13 Pyramid Rock to Sunderland Bay ................................................................................... 16 3.2.14 Sunderland Bay to Cape Woolamai ................................................................................ 16 3 .3 Threatening Processes ............................................................................................... 17 3.3.1 Weed Competition .......................................................................................................... 17 3 .3 .2 Soil Disturbance ............................................................................................................. 17 3 .3 .3 Rabbit Grazing ................................................................................................................ 17 3 .3 .4 Hydrological changes ..................................................................................................... 17 3.3.5 Drought. ........................................................................................................................... 18 3.3.6 Altered fire regimes ........................................................................................................ 18 3 .3. 7 Phytophora ...................................................................................................................... 18 3 .4 Sites of signifificance ................................................................................................ 18 3.4.1 A re-examination of sites identified by Opie et al (1984) follows: ................................ 19 3 .4.2 A re-examination of sites identified by Moorrees and Molnar(l 992) follows: .............. 20 3 .4.3 Sites of significance recognised during this study .......................................................... 20 4 WHOLE OF PARK ASSESSMENT••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 23 i 4.1 Evaluation of communities AND EV C's for zoning ................................................. 24 J 4.1.1 Conservation status of Ecological Vegetation Classes (EVC's) at bioregional level.. ... 24 5 MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS ........................................... 25 5 .1.1 Weed Control program ................................................................................................... 25 5 .1.2 Revegetation works ........................................................................................................ 25 5 .1.3 Land Acquisition ............................................................................................................ 25 5 .1.4 Lack ofrecruitment in Moonah Woodland communities ............................................... 25 5.1.5 Use of fire for Biodiversity ............................................................................................. 26 5.1.6 Environmental Weeds in PINP ....................................................................................... 26 6 VEGETATION DESCRIPTIONS ................................................................................ 28 6.1 Coastal Dune Scrub ................................................................................................... 28 6.1.1 Foredune Coastal Dune Scrub ........................................................................................ 28 6.1.2 Protected Cape Woolamai Coastal Dune Scrub ............................................................. 28 6.1.3 Exposed Cape Woolamai Coastal Dune Scrub ............................................................... 29 6.1.4 Inland Coastal Dune Scrub ............................................................................................. 30 6.1.5 Thyme Rice-flower Coastal Dune Scrub ........................................................................ 31 6.1.6 Hind dune Coastal Dune Scrub ...................................................................................... 31 6.1. 7 Common Boobialla Coastal Dune Scrub ........................................................................ 32 6.1.8 Coast Tea-tree Coastal Dune Scrub ................................................................................ 33 6.1.9 Seaberry Saltbush Coastal Dune Scrub .......................................................................... 33 6.2 Coastal Headland Scrub ............................................................................................ 34 6.2.1 Swamp Paperbark Coastal Headland Scrub .................................................................... 34 6.2.2 Clay Pan Coastal Headland Scrub .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 20 August 2011 BL Ltrdate Verd
    3 April 2017 Infrastructure Victoria Level 16, 530 Collins St Melbourne VIC 3000 Submitted via: yoursay.infrastructurevictoria.com.au/ports/submissions Re: Second Container Port Advice. BirdLife Australia is an independent science-based conservation organisation with more than 13,000 members and 100,000 supporters throughout Australia. We have an extensive ongoing program of bird conservation research and a range of citizen science projects that engage thousands of Australians. Our primary objective is to conserve and protect Australia's native birds and their habitat. We have an extensive ongoing program of bird conservation research, including our Shorebirds 2020 program, developed to address the ongoing decline of Australia’s resident and migratory shorebirds. Our Special Interest Group, the Australasian Wader Studies Group (AWSG) conducts and promotes shorebird research and conservation throughout Australasia. Through our Shorebirds 2020 program and the work of the AWSG, BirdLife Australia is recognised as a leading authority on the ecology and conservation of Australia’s shorebirds. BirdLife Australia has established a regular monitoring program for important shorebird sites throughout Australia including the Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula, and Western Port Ramsar sites. Both sites are recognised as providing internationally important habitat for waterbirds including a large number of migratory and threatened species listed under the Commonwealth Environment Protection & Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). BirdLife Australia has a long history of involvement in recovery actions for the Critically Endangered Orange-bellied Parrot, including ongoing coordination of the mainland monitoring program for the species. As Australia’s leading bird conservation advocate, BirdLife Australia should be considered a key stakeholder in future planning for the location of Victoria’s second container port.
    [Show full text]
  • Partial Flora Survey Rottnest Island Golf Course
    PARTIAL FLORA SURVEY ROTTNEST ISLAND GOLF COURSE Prepared by Marion Timms Commencing 1 st Fairway travelling to 2 nd – 11 th left hand side Family Botanical Name Common Name Mimosaceae Acacia rostellifera Summer scented wattle Dasypogonaceae Acanthocarpus preissii Prickle lily Apocynaceae Alyxia Buxifolia Dysentry bush Casuarinacea Casuarina obesa Swamp sheoak Cupressaceae Callitris preissii Rottnest Is. Pine Chenopodiaceae Halosarcia indica supsp. Bidens Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia blackiana Samphire Chenopodiaceae Threlkeldia diffusa Coast bonefruit Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia quinqueflora Beaded samphire Chenopodiaceae Suada australis Seablite Chenopodiaceae Atriplex isatidea Coast saltbush Poaceae Sporabolis virginicus Marine couch Myrtaceae Melaleuca lanceolata Rottnest Is. Teatree Pittosporaceae Pittosporum phylliraeoides Weeping pittosporum Poaceae Stipa flavescens Tussock grass 2nd – 11 th Fairway Family Botanical Name Common Name Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia quinqueflora Beaded samphire Chenopodiaceae Atriplex isatidea Coast saltbush Cyperaceae Gahnia trifida Coast sword sedge Pittosporaceae Pittosporum phyliraeoides Weeping pittosporum Myrtaceae Melaleuca lanceolata Rottnest Is. Teatree Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia blackiana Samphire Central drainage wetland commencing at Vietnam sign Family Botanical Name Common Name Chenopodiaceae Halosarcia halecnomoides Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia quinqueflora Beaded samphire Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia blackiana Samphire Poaceae Sporobolis virginicus Cyperaceae Gahnia Trifida Coast sword sedge
    [Show full text]
  • Longevity in Little Penguins Eudyptula Minor
    71 LONGEVITY IN LITTLE PENGUINS EUDYPTULA MINOR PETER DANN1, MELANIE CARRON2, BETTY CHAMBERS2, LYNDA CHAMBERS2, TONY DORNOM2, AUSTIN MCLAUGHLIN2, BARB SHARP2, MARY ELLEN TALMAGE2, RON THODAY2 & SPENCER UNTHANK2 1 Research Group, Phillip Island Nature Park, PO Box 97, Cowes, Phillip Island, Victoria, 3922, Australia ([email protected]) 2 Penguin Study Group, PO Box 97, Cowes, Phillip Island, Victoria, 3922, Australia Received 17 June 2005, accepted 18 November 2005 Little Penguins Eudyptula minor live around the mainland and Four were females, two were males and one was of unknown sex offshore islands of southern Australia and New Zealand (Marchant (Table 1). The oldest of the birds was a male that was banded by the & Higgins 1990). They are the smallest penguin species extant, Penguin Study Group as a chick before fledging on Phillip Island breeding in burrows and coming ashore only after nightfall. Most on 2 January 1976 in a part of the colony known as “the Penguin of their mortality appears to result from processes occurring at sea Parade.” This bird was not recorded again after initial banding (Dann 1992). The average life expectancy of breeding adult birds until it was five years old and was found raising two chicks at the is approximately 6.5 years (Reilly & Cullen 1979, Dann & Cullen Penguin Parade. This individual had a bill depth measurement 12% 1990, Dann et al. 1995); however, some individuals in southeastern less than the mean for male penguins from Phillip Island (Arnould Australia have lived far in excess of the average life expectancy. et al. 2004), but was classified as a male based on the sex of its mates (sexed as females from the presence of cloacal distension Approximately 44 000 birds have been flipper-banded on Phillip following egg-laying or from their bill-depth measurements).
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Societies for Growing Australian Plants
    ISSN - 335X November. 1994 ASSOCIATION OF SOCIETIES FOR GROWING AUSTRALIAN PLANTS THE AUSTRALIAN DAISY-STUDY GROUP-NEWSLETTER N0.40 Dear Members, With the bulk of collecting and observation completed for the Brachyscome Project, it looks as if drought will thwart me. Any rain that falls in the next couple of weeks will be too late for my collecting schedule. There's also the irritating problem of some arid area species failing to appreciate the urgency of our situation. They are being reluctant to germinate or to grow on down here in Melbourne. All this suggests there will be plenty of scope for follow-up research. Like all study groups and kindred organisations, we rely heavily on the willing co-operation and voluntary efforts of our members. ADSG is indeed fortunate in this regard. We are very grateful to Ruth Marriott for the design of our windcheater logo (see p.52 ). We were an extremely smart crew in white logo on navy at the recent Melbourne Wildflower Show. I The Daisy display made quite an impact and we have Maureen Schaumann to thank for the inspirational concept of "Uses of Daisies". One of the projects was undertaken in great secrecy. The only clue we had was that Maureen was working away with wood. At the unveiling we were stunned to see beautifully created necklaces designed from Cassinia aculeafa and C.laevis. What patience and creativity! Judy and Maureen supplied the range of dried flowers and Peggy MacAllister, Melbourne's Master Gardener, brought along a number of floral arrangements, a few of her own and some of her daughter's.
    [Show full text]
  • Climatic and Oceanographic Effects on Survival of Little Penguins in Southeastern Australia
    SCIENTIA MANU E T MENTE CLIMATIC AND OCEANOGRAPHIC EFFECTS ON SURVIVAL OF LITTLE PENGUINS IN SOUTHEASTERN AUSTRALIA A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Lucia-Marie Ganendran Applied and Industrial Mathematics Research Group, School of Physical, Environmental and Mathematical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force Academy. December 2017 PLEASE TYPE THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname or Family name: Ganendran First name: Lucia-Marie Other name/s: Billie Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: PhD School: School of Physical, Environmental and Mathematical Faculty: UNSW Canberra Sciences Title: Climatic and Oceanographic Effects on Survival of Little Penguins in Southeastern Australia Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASE TYPE) Climate change can impact on the survival of seabirds. While many studies have investigated the influences of climatic and oceanographic variables on seabird breeding, fewer have been able to capture the processes affecting survival. In this study, I carried out a mark-recapture analysis on a 46-year penguin dataset to study the effects of some climatic and oceanographic variables on the survival of little penguins Eudyptula minor in southeastern Australia. A priori knowledge of the birds' annual cycle and patterns of movement informed my selection of meaningful and biologically sensible variables. Two age classes of penguins were considered, based on their differing patterns of movement: first-year birds and adult birds in their second and subsequent years of life. The climatic and oceanographic variables considered in this study were wind strength, sea-surface temperature, east-west sea temperature gradient, air temperature, rainfall, humidity and chlorophyll a concentration.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Or Threatened Vascular Plant Species of Wollemi National Park, Central Eastern New South Wales
    Rare or threatened vascular plant species of Wollemi National Park, central eastern New South Wales. Stephen A.J. Bell Eastcoast Flora Survey PO Box 216 Kotara Fair, NSW 2289, AUSTRALIA Abstract: Wollemi National Park (c. 32o 20’– 33o 30’S, 150o– 151oE), approximately 100 km north-west of Sydney, conserves over 500 000 ha of the Triassic sandstone environments of the Central Coast and Tablelands of New South Wales, and occupies approximately 25% of the Sydney Basin biogeographical region. 94 taxa of conservation signiicance have been recorded and Wollemi is recognised as an important reservoir of rare and uncommon plant taxa, conserving more than 20% of all listed threatened species for the Central Coast, Central Tablelands and Central Western Slopes botanical divisions. For a land area occupying only 0.05% of these divisions, Wollemi is of paramount importance in regional conservation. Surveys within Wollemi National Park over the last decade have recorded several new populations of signiicant vascular plant species, including some sizeable range extensions. This paper summarises the current status of all rare or threatened taxa, describes habitat and associated species for many of these and proposes IUCN (2001) codes for all, as well as suggesting revisions to current conservation risk codes for some species. For Wollemi National Park 37 species are currently listed as Endangered (15 species) or Vulnerable (22 species) under the New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. An additional 50 species are currently listed as nationally rare under the Briggs and Leigh (1996) classiication, or have been suggested as such by various workers. Seven species are awaiting further taxonomic investigation, including Eucalyptus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • ORIGIN and DISTRIBUTION of AD M a Mm
    ORIGIN AND DISTRIBUTION OF ADmAmm~GPLANTS IN HAWAICI Lyndon Wester ABSTRACT Hawai'i has more than 800 known species of alien plants that are reproducing without direct human assistance. During this century, new plant species have been arriving at the rate of about five per year. Patterns of plant collecting in time and space suggest that other species await discovery and that data on the ranges of known species are far from satisfactory. The New and Old World tropics have supplied most of the adventive alien plants in Hawai'i, although other places, particularly those with which Hawai'i has close economic and cultural ties, have contributed significant numbers in recent years. INTRODUCTION The nature and derivation of native floras have long attracted the attention of biologists, but the rearrangement and wholesale homogenization of the world's biota caused by humans in the last 10,000 years has aroused comparatively little interest until recently. Contributing reasons for this are that alien plant invasions are generally short-lived, and that populations depend upon continued disturbance, are unstable, and are determined to a large extent on chance dispersal. Furthermore, there is a built-in preference for what is natural and rare and a prejudice against the commonplace and alien among biologists, except perhaps where economic factors are involved. To protect natural ecosystems, agriculture, and even urban areas from undesirable invasion from alien plants, reliable data about the alien species resent are needed. Information about how plants were introduced is help& 1 to plan means to limit further additions to the alien flora.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet Segregation Between Two Colonies of Little Penguins Eudyptula Minor in Southeast Australia
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Digital.CSIC Diet segregation between two colonies of little penguins Eudyptula minor in southeast Australia 1 2 3 ANDRÉ CHIARADIA, * MANUELA G. FORERO, KEITH A. HOBSON, 4 1,5 1 1 STEPHEN E. SWEARER, FIONA HUME, LEANNE RENWICK AND PETER DANN 1Research Department, Phillip Island Nature Parks, PO Box 97, Cowes,Vic. 3922, Australia (Email: [email protected]); 2Departamento de Biología de la Conser vación, Estación Biológica de Doñana, Avda Américo Vespucio, Sevilla, Spain; 3Environment Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; 4Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne,Victoria, and 5Private Bag 10, New Norfolk, Tasmania, Australia Abstract We studied foraging segregation between two different sized colonies of little penguins Eudyptula minor with overlapping foraging areas in pre-laying and incubation. We used stomach contents and stable isotope measurements of nitrogen (d15N) and carbon (d13C) in blood to examine differences in trophic position, prey-size and nutritional values between the two colonies. Diet of little penguins at St Kilda (small colony) relied heavily on anchovy while at Phillip Island (large colony), the diet was more diverse and anchovies were larger than those consumed by St Kilda penguins. Higher d15N values at St Kilda, differences in d13C values and the prey composition provided further evidence of diet segregation between colonies. Penguins from each colony took anchovies from different cohorts and probably different stocks, although these sites are only 70 km apart. Differences in diet were not reflected in protein levels in the blood of penguins, suggesting that variation in prey between colonies was not related to differences in nutritional value of the diet.
    [Show full text]
  • Geraldton Mt Magnet Road SLK 222.45 Biological Survey May 2012
    Main Roads Western Australia Report for Material Source Area: Geraldton Mt Magnet Road SLK 222.45 Biological Survey May 2012 This Report: has been prepared by GHD for Main Roads Western Australia (MRWA) and may only be used and relied on by MRWA for the purpose agreed between GHD and MRWA as set out in section 1.3 of this Report. GHD otherwise disclaims responsibility to any person other than MRWA arising in connection with this Report. GHD also excludes implied warranties and conditions, to the extent legally permissible. The services undertaken by GHD in connection with preparing this Report were limited to those specifically detailed in the Report and are subject to the scope limitations set out in the Report. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on conditions encountered and information reviewed at the date of preparation of the Report. GHD has no responsibility or obligation to update this Report to account for events or changes occurring subsequent to the date that the Report was prepared. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on assumptions made by GHD described in this Report. GHD disclaims liability arising from any of the assumptions being incorrect. GHD has prepared this Report on the basis of information provided by MRWA and others who provided information to GHD (including Government authorities), which GHD has not independently verified or checked beyond the agreed scope of work. GHD does not accept liability in connection with such unverified information, including errors and omissions in the Report which were caused by errors or omissions in that information.” The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on information obtained from, and testing undertaken at or in connection with, specific sample points.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Census of the Vascular Plants of Tasmania
    A CENSUS OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF TASMANIA, INCLUDING MACQUARIE ISLAND MF de Salas & ML Baker 2016 edition Tasmanian Herbarium, Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery Department of State Growth Tasmanian Vascular Plant Census 2016 A Census of the Vascular Plants of Tasmania, Including Macquarie Island. 2016 edition MF de Salas and ML Baker Postal address: Street address: Tasmanian Herbarium College Road PO Box 5058 Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7005 UTAS LPO Australia Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7005 Australia © Tasmanian Herbarium, Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery Published by the Tasmanian Herbarium, Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery GPO Box 1164 Hobart, Tasmania 7001 Australia www.tmag.tas.gov.au Cite as: de Salas, M.F. and Baker, M.L. (2016) A Census of the Vascular Plants of Tasmania, Including Macquarie Island. (Tasmanian Herbarium, Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery. Hobart) www.tmag.tas.gov.au ISBN 978-1-921599-83-5 (PDF) 2 Tasmanian Vascular Plant Census 2016 Introduction The classification systems used in this Census largely follow Cronquist (1981) for flowering plants (Angiosperms) and McCarthy (1998) for conifers, ferns and their allies. The same classification systems are used to arrange the botanical collections of the Tasmanian Herbarium and by the Flora of Australia series published by the Australian Biological Resources Study (ABRS). For a more up-to-date classification of the flora refer to The Flora of Tasmania Online (Duretto 2009+) which currently follows APG II (2003). This census also serves as an index to The Student’s Flora of Tasmania (Curtis 1963, 1967, 1979; Curtis & Morris 1975, 1994). Species accounts can be found in The Student’s Flora of Tasmania by referring to the volume and page number reference that is given in the rightmost column (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No.68
    ISSN 0818 - 335X MARCH, 2004 ASSOCIATION OF SOCIETIES FOR GROWING AUSTRALIAN PLANTS ABN 56 654 053 676 THE AUSTRALIAN DAISY STUDY GROUP NEWSLETTER NO. 68 Leader's letter and coming events Species or forms new to members Helichrysum rutidolepis (Oberon) Judy Barker Calomeria amaranthoides Jeff Irons Fire Recovery Ros Cornish Tasmanian Garden Visit - November 2003 Pat Webb Summer flowering daisies at Mulgrave Maureen Schaumann In my Emerald garden Pat Tratt Pterocaulonsphacelatum Barrie Hadlow Ozothamnus ledifolius Pat Webb Propagation pages - Bev Courtney, Judy Barker, Matt Hurst. Mallacoota Magic Weekend Sylvia Oats Daisies for Christmas decorations Ros Cornish Cratystylis conocephala Judy Barker and Natalie Peate Members' reports - Sylvia Oats, Bev Courtney, Philip Wilson, Ros Cornish, Angus Stewart, Matt Hurst Reports from friends of ADSG - Pat Fitzgerald, Margaret Guenzel Christmas outing, We were wrong, editor's note. new members Calocephalus platycephalus x 213 Seed donors, seed wanted, Seed Bank list (illustrated by Betty Campbell) OFFICE BMRERS: Leader and ADSG Herbarium Curator - Joy Greig, PO Box 258, Mallacoota, 3892. TellFax: (03) 51 58 0669 (or Unit 1, la Buchanan St, Boronia, 3155.) Email [email protected] Treasurer - Bev Courtney, 9 Nirvana Close, Langwarrin, 3910. Provenance Seed Co-ordinator - Maureen Schaumann, 88 Albany Drive, Mulgrave. 3170. Tel: (03) 9547 3670 Garden and Commercial Seed Co-ordinator and Interim Newsletter Editor: -Judy Barker, 9 Widford St, East Hawthorn, 3123. Tel: (03) 9813 2916 Fax: (03) 9813 1195 WEB PAGE http:llfarrer.csu.edu.aulASGAPldaisy,html LEADER'S LETTER I am pleased to inform members that the Esma Salkin Studentship for the summer of 200312004 was awarded to Ray McMahon.
    [Show full text]
  • South East Flora
    Regional Species Conservation Assessments DENR South East Region Complete Dataset for all Flora Assessments Dec 2011 In Alphabetical Order of Species Name MAP ID FAMILY NAME PLANT FORM NSX CODE SPECIES NAME COMMON NAME SOUTH EAST Regional EAST SOUTH Status Regional EAST SOUTH Status Score Regional Trend EAST SOUTH Score Regional EAST SOUTH Status+Trend Score SOUTH EAST Regional Trend EAST SOUTH FAMILY FAMILY NUMBER (CENSUS OF SA) EPBCACTSTATUSCODE NPWACTSTATUSCODE LASTOBSERVED_in_SE TOTAL_in_SA TOTAL_in_SE %_SOUTH_EAST_REGION EofO_in_SE_All_km2 EofO_in_SE_Recent_km2 AofO_in_SE_All_km2 AofO_in_SE_Recent_km2 711 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes Y01536 Acacia acinacea Wreath Wattle 2009 814 60 7.37 3000 1700 48 27 LC 1 0 0.3 1.3 712 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes K01545 Acacia brachybotrya Grey Mulga-bush 2001 563 18 3.20 800 500 16 9 RA 3 0 0.3 3.3 713 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes M01554 Acacia continua Thorn Wattle 1974 836 1 0.12 100 1 VU 4 DD 0.0 4.0 714 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes C05237 Acacia cupularis Cup Wattle 2002 577 83 14.38 4700 1500 65 20 LC 1 0 0.3 1.3 716 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes K01561 Acacia dodonaeifolia Hop-bush Wattle R 2002 237 33 13.92 800 400 19 6 RA 3 0 0.3 3.3 718 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes M01562 Acacia enterocarpa Jumping-jack Wattle EN E 2008 92 16 17.39 700 400 10 7 VU 4 0 0.3 4.3 719 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes C05985 Acacia euthycarpa Wallowa 1992 681 7 1.03 500 100 7 1 RA 3 - 0.4 3.4 720 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes S01565 Acacia farinosa Mealy Wattle 1997 325 88 27.08 4000 1600 65 23 NT 2 0 0.3 2.3 721 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE
    [Show full text]