Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Oril Is Not Required for Virus Infection In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Oril Is Not Required for Virus Infection In JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, Nov. 1987, p. 3528-3535 Vol. 61, No. 11 0022-538X/87/113528-08$02.00/0 Copyright C 1987, American Society for Microbiology Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 oriL Is Not Required for Virus Replication or for the Establishment and Reactivation of Latent Infection in Mice MARYELLEN POLVINO-BODNAR, PAULO K. ORBERG, AND PRISCILLA A. SCHAFFER* Laboratory of Tumor Virus Genetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 Received 11 May 1987/Accepted 31 July 1987 During the course of experiments designed to isolate deletion mutants of herpes simplex virus type 1 in the gene encoding the major DNA-binding protein, ICP8, a mutant, d61, that grew efficiently in ICP8-expressing Vero cells but not in normal Vero cells was isolated (P. K. Orberg and P. A. Schaffer, J. Virol. 61:1136-1146, 1987). d61 was derived by cotransfection of ICP8-expressing Vero cells with infectious wild-type viral DNA and a plasmid, pDX, that contains an engineered 780-base-pair (bp) deletion in the ICP8 gene, as well as a spontaneous -55-bp deletion in OriL. Gel electrophoresis and Southern blot analysis indicated that d61 DNA carried both deletions present in pDX. The ability of d61 to replicate despite the deletion in OriL suggested that a functional OriL is not essential for virus replication in vitro. Because d61 harbored two mutations, a second mutant, ts+7, with a deletion in oriL-associated sequences and an intact ICP8 gene was constructed. Both d61 and ts+7 replicated efficiently in their respective permissive host cells, although their yields were slightly lower than those of control viruses with intact oriL sequences. An in vitro test of origin function of isolated OriL sequences from wild-type virus and ts+7 showed that wild-type OHiL, but not ts+7 OHIL, was functional upon infection with helper virus. In an effort to determine the requirement for OriL in latency, ts+7 was compared with wild-type virus for its ability to establish, maintain, and be reactivated from latent infection in a murine eye model. The mutant was reactivated as efficiently as was wild-type virus from trigeminal ganglia after cocultivation with permissive cells, and each of the seven reactivated isolates was shown to carry the -150-bp deletion characteristic of ts+7. These observations demonstrate that OHL is not required for virus replication in vitro or for the establishment and reactivation of latent infection in vivo. The genome of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is a While oris sequences are stable upon cloning in bacteria, the linear, double-stranded DNA molecule of approximately larger oriL palindrome suffers deletions with high frequency 160,000 base pairs (bp). It consists of a long unique region when propagated in bacterial vectors (12, 45). Spontaneous (UL) flanked by inverted repeat sequences ab and b'a' and an or engineered deletions within oris and oriL palindromes S component consisting of a short unique region (Us) flanked result in loss of the capacity for autonomous replication (38, by the inverted repeats ac and c'a' (Fig. 1, line 1). During the 45). process of viral DNA synthesis, molecules are generated in The existence of two classes of defective interfering which the long and short components of the genome are particles (class I, whose genomes contain oris sequences, inverted relative to one another such that approximately and class II, whose genomes contain oriL sequences) dem- equimolar amounts of the four possible isomers of viral DNA onstrates that both origins are indeed capable of functioning are produced (1, 36). The viral genome is thought to replicate during productive infection in vitro (7, 8, 19). Little is by a rolling-circle mechanism which yields large head-to-tail known, however, about the requirement for each class of concatemeric intermediates that are subsequently cleaved to origin in the process of viral DNA synthesis (i.e., are oriL generate unit-length molecules (1, 3). Early electron micro- and both copies of oris essential for viral DNA synthesis?) or scopic studies provided evidence for the existence of two whether one class of origin is preferentially used during origins of DNA synthesis in the HSV-1 genome, one near the latent infection. The former question was partially answered center of UL and another near one end of the molecule (9, in a recent report that a mutant of HSV-1 lacking one copy 14). Studies of the genomes of defective interfering particles of oris is viable (23). In this paper, we demonstrate that the generated during serial passage of virus at high multiplicity absence of a functional oriL has little effect on viral replica- of infection and tests of origin function with cloned viral tion in vitro. Furthermore, we show that oriL is not required DNA fragments have shown that HSV-1 DNA contains two for the establishment or reactivation of latent infection in a copies of one origin, termed oris, located in the c and c' murine eye model. inverted repeats, and one copy of a second, more complex origin, termed oriL, located near the center of UL (2, 7, 8, 16-18, 25, 35, 37, 43). MATERIALS AND METHODS For origin function, the diploid oris requires no more than 90 bp, which includes an almost perfect palindromic se- Cells and viruses. African green monkey kidney (CV-1, quence of45 bp (40). oriL shares considerable homology with Vero, and U-47) and human embryonic lung (HEL) cells oris and contains a perfect 144-bp palindrome (12, 28, 45). were propagated and maintained as previously described (44). ICP8-expressing U-47 cells used as permissive hosts for the derivation and propagation of ICP8 deletion mutants * Corresponding author. were derived by cotransfection of Vero cells with the ICP8- 3528 VOL. 61, 1987 oriL DELETION MUTANTS OF HSV-1 3529 a b UL b'a'o' US co -- - - - - - - - - - - 2 . , . I 1 I 1 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.41 0.42 0.43 0.44 3.3kb gB 4.2 kb ICP8 4.3kb D 0 ICP8 4.2kb lOkb -.. DNAMI. 5.6 kb ? tsA24- 9kb ? 4 I C*j 0 to -i it to C-i 0 Wm M BS B T p 0 E In (Alf qt CM C*j it) 102 in 5 'W 1 'I II I i I I I 11 1 11 I I I 111- XP K P TP S X X K T SP x'6 XTK TB T SKE B K p Ox 6 pKEF-P4 i--- Bom HI p E E= Eco RI 7 pSGIS-SaIIA ---4 Kr- Kpn I s P- Pst I 8 pDX i A --q s x x s SZSGI I Tz Bst E 11 Xz Xho I FIG. 1. Genomic location of oriL and plasmids used in this study. The prototype arrangement of the HSV-1 genome is shown in line 1. The map units of the expanded, central portion of the long unique region (UL) are shown in line 2. The transcripts known to map to this region of the genome (all of the early or 0 kinetic class [15]) and the location of the oriL (12, 45) are shown in line 3. The length of the transcript is indicated in kilobases (kb). The location of the mutation in the ICP8 ts mutant used in this study, tsA24, appears in line 4 (44). Relevant restriction sites and the corresponding nucleotide numbers (28) are depicted in the next three lines; the symbol A represents deletion in oriL sequences of -55 bp which is present in the parental plasmid, pKEF-P4, from which pSG18-Sa/I A and pDX were derived. containing plasmid pKEF-P4 (Fig. 1, line 6) and pSV2neo viral or cellular DNA were detected by the method of (27, 34). Southern (33). Probes were labeled with [12P]dCTP and The KOS strain of HSV-1 was used as the wild-type virus [32P]dGTP (Amersham Corp., Arlington Heights, 111.) by from which temperature-sensitive QsA24 [44]) and deletion nick translation (24). mutants were derived. Viruses were propagated and assayed Marker transfer and marker rescue. Vero and U-47 cells as previously described (31). were cotransfected with infectious viral (KOS or tsA24) Plasmids and cloning. The map locations oforiL-associated DNA and plasmid (pDX or pKEF-P4) DNAs as previously viral DNA inserts in plasmids used in this study are shown in described (29). Fig. 1. pKEF-P4 (4) and ptkCAToris (not shown) were Cloning and sequencing0fiL from ts'7. Viral DNA from kindly provided by N. DeLuca. The latter plasmid is a ts'7 was digested to completion with KpnI and cloned into derivative of ptkCAT (6) which contains a 220-bp SmaI Kpnl-cleaved pUC18. Clones containing the Kpnl V frag- fragment that contains oris. pSG18-Sall A (21; Fig. 1, line 7) ment were identified by filter hybridization (13) with the contains the intact gene for ICP8 and a spontaneous -55-bp KpnI V fragment of pKEF-P4 as the probe. The Rsal- deletion in oriL- pDX (Fig. 1, line 8) was derived from BamHl fragment of Kpnl V, which contains the large pSG18-SalI A by digestion with Xhol and religation. pUC18 palindrome of oriL, was subcloned into BamHI- and Hincll- (46) was obtained from Pharmacia, Inc. (Piscataway, N.J.). cleaved M13mp18. The Rsal-BamHl fragment cloned into Restriction endonucleases and T4 DNA ligase were ob- M13mp18 was the same size on acrylamide gels (i.e., ±5 bp) tained from New England BioLabs, Inc.
Recommended publications
  • Foamy Virus Assembly with Emphasis on Pol Encapsidation
    Viruses 2013, 5, 886-900; doi:10.3390/v5030886 OPEN ACCESS viruses ISSN 1999-4915 www.mdpi.com/journal/viruses Review Foamy Virus Assembly with Emphasis on Pol Encapsidation Eun-Gyung Lee 1, Carolyn R. Stenbak 2 and Maxine L. Linial 1,* 1 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Basic Sciences Division; 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (EGL); [email protected] (MLL) 2 Seattle University, Biology Department; 901 12th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98122, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-206- 667-4442; Fax: +1-206-667-5939 Received: 31 January 2013; in revised form: 11 March 2013 / Accepted: 14 March 2013 / Published: 20 March 2013 Abstract: Foamy viruses (FVs) differ from all other genera of retroviruses (orthoretroviruses) in many aspects of viral replication. In this review, we discuss FV assembly, with special emphasis on Pol incorporation. FV assembly takes place intracellularly, near the pericentriolar region, at a site similar to that used by betaretroviruses. The regions of Gag, Pol and genomic RNA required for viral assembly are described. In contrast to orthoretroviral Pol, which is synthesized as a Gag-Pol fusion protein and packaged through Gag-Gag interactions, FV Pol is synthesized from a spliced mRNA lacking all Gag sequences. Thus, encapsidation of FV Pol requires a different mechanism. We detail how WT Pol lacking Gag sequences is incorporated into virus particles. In addition, a mutant in which Pol is expressed as an orthoretroviral-like Gag-Pol fusion protein is discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Topological Analysis of the Gp41 MPER on Lipid Bilayers Relevant to the Metastable HIV-1 Envelope Prefusion State
    Topological analysis of the gp41 MPER on lipid bilayers relevant to the metastable HIV-1 envelope prefusion state Yi Wanga,b, Pavanjeet Kaurc,d, Zhen-Yu J. Sune,1, Mostafa A. Elbahnasawya,b,2, Zahra Hayatic,d, Zhi-Song Qiaoa,b,3, Nhat N. Buic, Camila Chilea,b,4, Mahmoud L. Nasre,5, Gerhard Wagnere, Jia-Huai Wanga,f, Likai Songc, Ellis L. Reinherza,b,6, and Mikyung Kima,g,6 aLaboratory of Immunobiology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115; bDepartment of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; cNational High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306; dDepartment of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306; eDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; fDepartment of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215; and gDepartment of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215 Edited by Peter Palese, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, and approved September 23, 2019 (received for review July 18, 2019) The membrane proximal external region (MPER) of HIV-1 envelope immunologically vulnerable epitopes targeted by several of the most glycoprotein (gp) 41 is an attractive vaccine target for elicitation of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) developed during the broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) by vaccination. However, course of natural HIV-1 infection (10–13). Insertion, deletion, current details regarding the quaternary structural organization of and mutations of residues in the MPER defined the functional the MPER within the native prefusion trimer [(gp120/41)3] are elu- importance of the MPER in Env incorporation, viral fusion, and sive and even contradictory, hindering rational MPER immunogen infectivity (14–16).
    [Show full text]
  • Viroporins: Structures and Functions Beyond Cell Membrane Permeabilization
    Editorial Viroporins: Structures and Functions beyond Cell Membrane Permeabilization José Luis Nieva 1,* and Luis Carrasco 2,* Received: 17 September 2015 ; Accepted: 21 September 2015 ; Published: 29 September 2015 Academic Editor: Eric O. Freed 1 Biophysics Unit (CSIC, UPV/EHU) and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), P.O. Box 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain 2 Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CSIC, UAM), c/Nicolás Cabrera, 1, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.L.N.); [email protected] (L.C.); Tel.: +34-94-601-3353 (J.L.N.); +34-91-497-8450 (L.C.) Viroporins represent an interesting group of viral proteins that exhibit two sets of functions. First, they participate in several viral processes that are necessary for efficient production of virus progeny. Besides, viroporins interfere with a number of cellular functions, thus contributing to viral cytopathogenicity. Twenty years have elapsed from the first review on viroporins [1]; since then several reviews have covered the advances on viroporin structure and functioning [2–8]. This Special Issue updates and revises new emerging roles of viroporins, highlighting their potential use as antiviral targets and in vaccine development. Viroporin structure. Viroporins are usually short proteins with at least one hydrophobic amphipathic helix. Homo-oligomerization is achieved by helix–helix interactions in membranes rendering higher order structures, forming aqueous pores. Progress in viroporin structures during the last 2–3 years has in some instances provided a detailed knowledge of their functional architecture, including the fine definition of binding sites for effective inhibitors.
    [Show full text]
  • How Influenza Virus Uses Host Cell Pathways During Uncoating
    cells Review How Influenza Virus Uses Host Cell Pathways during Uncoating Etori Aguiar Moreira 1 , Yohei Yamauchi 2 and Patrick Matthias 1,3,* 1 Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, 4058 Basel, Switzerland; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Life Sciences, School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Sciences, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Influenza is a zoonotic respiratory disease of major public health interest due to its pan- demic potential, and a threat to animals and the human population. The influenza A virus genome consists of eight single-stranded RNA segments sequestered within a protein capsid and a lipid bilayer envelope. During host cell entry, cellular cues contribute to viral conformational changes that promote critical events such as fusion with late endosomes, capsid uncoating and viral genome release into the cytosol. In this focused review, we concisely describe the virus infection cycle and highlight the recent findings of host cell pathways and cytosolic proteins that assist influenza uncoating during host cell entry. Keywords: influenza; capsid uncoating; HDAC6; ubiquitin; EPS8; TNPO1; pandemic; M1; virus– host interaction Citation: Moreira, E.A.; Yamauchi, Y.; Matthias, P. How Influenza Virus Uses Host Cell Pathways during 1. Introduction Uncoating. Cells 2021, 10, 1722. Viruses are microscopic parasites that, unable to self-replicate, subvert a host cell https://doi.org/10.3390/ for their replication and propagation. Despite their apparent simplicity, they can cause cells10071722 severe diseases and even pose pandemic threats [1–3].
    [Show full text]
  • Assembly Lecture 11 Biology W3310/4310 Virology Spring 2014
    Assembly Lecture 11 Biology W3310/4310 Virology Spring 2014 “Anatomy is des.ny.” --SIGMUND FREUD All virions complete a common set of assembly reac3ons * common to all viruses common to many viruses ©Principles of Virology, ASM Press The structure of a virus parcle determines how it is formed ©Principles of Virology, ASM Press Assembly is dependent on host cell machinery • Cellular chaperones • Transport systems • Secretory pathway • Nuclear import and export machinery Concentrang components for assembly: Nothing happens fast in dilute solu1ons • Viral components oSen visible by light microscopy (‘factories’ or ‘inclusions’) • Concentrate proteins on internal membranes (poliovirus) • Negri bodies (rabies virus) Viral proteins have ‘addresses’ built into their structure • Membrane targeYng: Signal sequences, fa\y acid modificaons • Membrane retenYon signals • Nuclear localizaYon sequences (NLS) • Nuclear export signals 414 Localiza3on of viral proteins to the nucleus CHAPTER 12 Golgi apparatus Ribosome Rough endoplasmic reticulum Plasma membrane Py(VP1) + VP2/3 Ad hexon + 5 100 kDa Nuclear envelope: Outer nuclear membrane Inner nuclear membrane Nucleus Nuclear pore complex Mitochondrion Cytoskeleton: Influenza virus NP Intermediate filament Microtubule Actin filament bundle Extracellular matrix ©Principles of Virology, ASM Press Figure 12.1 Localization of viral proteins to the nucleus. The nucleus and major membrane-bound compartments of the cytoplasm, as well as components of the cytoskeleton, are illustrated schematically and not to scale. Viral proteins destined for the nucleus are synthesized by cytoplasmic polyribosomes, as illustrated for the infl uenza virus NP protein. They engage with the cytoplasmic face of the nuclear pore complex and are translocated into the nucleus by the protein import machinery of the host cell.
    [Show full text]
  • (Infected Cell Protein 8) of Herpes Simplex Virus L*
    THEJOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 262, No. 9, Issue of March 25, pp. 4260-4266, 1987 0 1987 by The American Society of Biological Chemists, Inc Printed in U.S. A. Interaction between theDNA Polymerase and Single-stranded DNA- binding Protein (Infected Cell Protein 8) of Herpes Simplex Virus l* (Received for publication, September 22, 1986) Michael E. O’DonnellS, Per EliasQ,Barbara E. Funnellll, and I. R. Lehman From the Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305 The herpes virus-encoded DNA replication protein, ICP8 completely inhibits replication of singly primed ssDNA infected cell protein 8 (ICPS), binds specifically to templates by the herpespolymerase. On the other hand, ICP8 single-stranded DNA with a stoichiometry of one ICPS strongly stimulates replication of duplex DNA. It does so, molecule/l2 nucleotides. In the absence of single- however, onlyin the presence of anuclear extract from stranded DNA, it assembles into long filamentous herpes-infected cells. structures. Binding of ICPS inhibits DNA synthesis by the herpes-induced DNA polymerase on singly primed EXPERIMENTALPROCEDURES single-stranded DNA circles. In contrast, ICPS greatly Materials-DNase I and venom phosphodiesterase were obtained stimulates replication of circular duplex DNA by the from Worthington. The syntheticoligodeoxynucleotide (44-mer) was polymerase. Stimulation occurs only in the presence of synthesized by the solid-phase coupling of protected phosphoramidate a nuclear extract from herpes-infected cells. Appear- nucleoside derivatives (11).3H-Labeled #X ssDNA was a gift from ance of the stimulatory activity in nuclear extracts Dr. R. Bryant (this department). pMOB45 (10.5 kilobases) linear coincides closely with the time of appearance of her- duplex plasmid DNA was a gift from Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Enzyme Activities in Four Different Forms of Human Immunodeficiency
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 88, pp. 45%-4600, June 1991 Biochemistry Enzyme activities in four different forms of human immunodeficiency virus 1 poi gene products (reverse transcriptase/RNase H/crossover linker mutagenesis/baculoirus expression system) YU-WEN HU AND C. YONG KANG Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ottawa, Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1H 8M5 Communicated by Max D. Summers, February 19, 1991 (received for review December 3, 1990) ABSTRACT Five cassettes of the pol gene of human im- activity (10, 11) but no RNase H activity (3, 7, 12, 13). The munodeficiency virus 1 were constructed and inserted under reverse transcriptase isolated from purified HIV-1 has a the control of the polyhedrin gene promoter of Autographa molecular mass of 95 (14) to 110 (15) kDa, as determined by calfornica nuclear polyhedrosis virus by homologous recom- gel filtration and glycerol gradient centrifugation, respec- bination. The first cassette polF contains the full-length pol tively. However, the 98-kDa nonprocessed polyprotein ex- open reading frame; the second cassette pollOO starts with the pressed in Escherichia coli displayed little or no reverse first AUG codon of the pol gene and deletes 103 amino acids transcriptase activity (16). The p66/pSi heterodimer ex- from the amino terminus of the pol gene product; the third pressed in E. coli has an apparent molecular mass of 120-130 cassette po197 deletes the entire protease coding sequence; the kDa and was active (5, 6). In addition, there is a 165-kDa fourth cassette po166 deletes both the protease and endonucle- putative gag-pol precursor polyprotein that also possesses ase/integrase coding sequences; and the fifth cassette polSl reverse transcriptase activity (10).
    [Show full text]
  • Ube1a Suppresses Herpes Simplex Virus-1 Replication
    viruses Article UBE1a Suppresses Herpes Simplex Virus-1 Replication Marina Ikeda 1 , Akihiro Ito 2, Yuichi Sekine 1 and Masahiro Fujimuro 1,* 1 Department of Cell Biology, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Kyoto 607-8412, Japan; [email protected] (M.I.); [email protected] (Y.S.) 2 Laboratory of Cell Signaling, School of Life Sciences, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Tokyo 192-0392, Japan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +81-75-595-4717 Academic Editors: Magdalena Weidner-Glunde and Andrea Lipi´nska Received: 7 November 2020; Accepted: 1 December 2020; Published: 4 December 2020 Abstract: Herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) is the causative agent of cold sores, keratitis, meningitis, and encephalitis. HSV-1-encoded ICP5, the major capsid protein, is essential for capsid assembly during viral replication. Ubiquitination is a post-translational modification that plays a critical role in the regulation of cellular events such as proteasomal degradation, protein trafficking, and the antiviral response and viral events such as the establishment of infection and viral replication. Ub-activating enzyme (E1, also named UBE1) is involved in the first step in the ubiquitination. However, it is still unknown whether UBE1 contributes to viral infection or the cellular antiviral response. Here, we found that UBE1a suppressed HSV-1 replication and contributed to the antiviral response. The UBE1a inhibitor PYR-41 increased HSV-1 production. Immunofluorescence analysis revealed that UBE1a highly expressing cells presented low ICP5 expression, and vice versa. UBE1a inhibition by PYR-41 and shRNA increased ICP5 expression in HSV-1-infected cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomic Diversity in Rotavirus and the Current Scenario of Rotavirus Vaccines: a Brief Overview
    Central Archives of Paediatrics and Developmental Pathology Bringing Excellence in Open Access Review Article *Corresponding author Vijaya Lakshmi Nag, Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India, Tel: Genomic Diversity in Rotavirus 918003996874; Email: Submitted: 15 October 2017 and the Current Scenario of Accepted: 01 November 2017 Published: 03 November 2017 Copyright Rotavirus Vaccines: A Brief © 2017 Nag et al. Overview OPEN ACCESS Keywords Vijaya Lakshmi Nag* and Kumar Saurabh • Rotavirus infection Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India • Genomic diversity • Rotavirus vaccines Abstract Rotavirus associated infection still dominates the list of diarrheal illnesses in paediatric population despite the availability of effective Rotavirus vaccines. Frequent genetic reassortment in the genome of rotavirus leads to emergence of novel genotypes in different geographic areas worldwide. This review aims to give a brief overview of the genetic diversity prevailing in rotavirus worldwide with a focus on the vaccines available for rotavirus infection. ABBREVIATIONS may also be used. Electron microscopy and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis are also useful. Molecular techniques like nested RV: Rotavirus Infection; RNA: Ribonucleic Acid; EIA: polymerase chain reaction (PCR), multiplex PCR and Reverse Enzyme Immunoassay; ELISA: Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) in stool samples can additionally Assay; IgA: Immunoglobulin A; IgG: Immunoglobulin G; PCR: help in the genotypic studies [5-7]. The genetic sequencing Polymerase Chain Reaction; RT-PCR: Reverse Transcriptase PCR; methods like microarray and real time PCR (RT-qPCR) are very VP: Viral Structural Protein; NSP: Non-Structural Protein; PAGE: sensitive methods for diagnosis [8]. Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis; RRV: Rhesus Rotavirus, UIP: Universal Immunization Programme; WHO: World Health Vaccine development and implementation has seen lots of Organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Lentivirus and Lentiviral Vectors Fact Sheet
    Lentivirus and Lentiviral Vectors Family: Retroviridae Genus: Lentivirus Enveloped Size: ~ 80 - 120 nm in diameter Genome: Two copies of positive-sense ssRNA inside a conical capsid Risk Group: 2 Lentivirus Characteristics Lentivirus (lente-, latin for “slow”) is a group of retroviruses characterized for a long incubation period. They are classified into five serogroups according to the vertebrate hosts they infect: bovine, equine, feline, ovine/caprine and primate. Some examples of lentiviruses are Human (HIV), Simian (SIV) and Feline (FIV) Immunodeficiency Viruses. Lentiviruses can deliver large amounts of genetic information into the DNA of host cells and can integrate in both dividing and non- dividing cells. The viral genome is passed onto daughter cells during division, making it one of the most efficient gene delivery vectors. Most lentiviral vectors are based on the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), which will be used as a model of lentiviral vector in this fact sheet. Structure of the HIV Virus The structure of HIV is different from that of other retroviruses. HIV is roughly spherical with a diameter of ~120 nm. HIV is composed of two copies of positive ssRNA that code for nine genes enclosed by a conical capsid containing 2,000 copies of the p24 protein. The ssRNA is tightly bound to nucleocapsid proteins, p7, and enzymes needed for the development of the virion: reverse transcriptase (RT), proteases (PR), ribonuclease and integrase (IN). A matrix composed of p17 surrounds the capsid ensuring the integrity of the virion. This, in turn, is surrounded by an envelope composed of two layers of phospholipids taken from the membrane of a human cell when a newly formed virus particle buds from the cell.
    [Show full text]
  • HSV-1 Single-Cell Analysis Reveals the Activation of Anti-Viral And
    RESEARCH ARTICLE HSV-1 single-cell analysis reveals the activation of anti-viral and developmental programs in distinct sub-populations Nir Drayman1,2*, Parthiv Patel1,2, Luke Vistain1,2, Savas¸Tay1,2* 1Institute for Molecular Engineering, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States; 2Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States Abstract Viral infection is usually studied at the population level by averaging over millions of cells. However, infection at the single-cell level is highly heterogeneous, with most infected cells giving rise to no or few viral progeny while some cells produce thousands. Analysis of Herpes Simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) infection by population-averaged measurements has taught us a lot about the course of viral infection, but has also produced contradictory results, such as the concurrent activation and inhibition of type I interferon signaling during infection. Here, we combine live-cell imaging and single-cell RNA sequencing to characterize viral and host transcriptional heterogeneity during HSV-1 infection of primary human cells. We find extreme variability in the level of viral gene expression among individually infected cells and show that these cells cluster into transcriptionally distinct sub-populations. We find that anti-viral signaling is initiated in a rare group of abortively infected cells, while highly infected cells undergo cellular reprogramming to an embryonic-like transcriptional state. This reprogramming involves the recruitment of b-catenin to the host nucleus and viral replication compartments, and is required for late viral gene expression and progeny production. These findings uncover the transcriptional differences in cells with variable infection outcomes and shed new light on the manipulation of host pathways by HSV-1.
    [Show full text]
  • HIV-1) CD4 Receptor and Its Central Role in Promotion of HIV-1 Infection
    MICROBIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, Mar. 1995, p. 63–93 Vol. 59, No. 1 0146-0749/95/$04.0010 Copyright q 1995, American Society for Microbiology The Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) CD4 Receptor and Its Central Role in Promotion of HIV-1 Infection STEPHANE BOUR,* ROMAS GELEZIUNAS,† AND MARK A. WAINBERG* McGill AIDS Centre, Lady Davis Institute-Jewish General Hospital, and Departments of Microbiology and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1E2 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................................63 RETROVIRAL RECEPTORS .....................................................................................................................................64 Receptors for Animal Retroviruses ........................................................................................................................64 CD4 Is the Major Receptor for HIV-1 Infection..................................................................................................65 ROLE OF THE CD4 CORECEPTOR IN T-CELL ACTIVATION........................................................................65 Structural Features of the CD4 Coreceptor..........................................................................................................65 Interactions of CD4 with Class II MHC Determinants ......................................................................................66 CD4–T-Cell Receptor Interactions during T-Cell Activation
    [Show full text]