DOCSLIB.ORG

Written Answers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Written Answers Safer Neighbourhood Teams - Target Strength vs. Actual Strength March 2012 Appendix A - Q1652 Police Sergeant Police Constable PCSOs Borough Safer Neighbourhood Team Target Actual Variance Target Actual Variance Target Actual Variance BS - Kensington Safer Neighbourhood Team Abingdon Ward 0.50 (0.50) 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 5.00 2.00 Safer Neighbourhood Team Brompton Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 5.00 2.00 Safer Neighbourhood Team Campden Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 4.00 2.00 3.00 5.89 2.89 Safer Neighbourhood Team Colville Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 8.00 5.00 Safer Neighbourhood Team Courtfield Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 3.67 0.67 Safer Neighbourhood Team Cremorne & Stanley Wards 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 1.00 (1.00) 3.00 5.04 2.04 Safer Neighbourhood Team Earls Court Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 8.30 5.30 Safer Neighbourhood Team Golborne Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 4.00 1.00 Safer Neighbourhood Team Hans Town & Royal Hospital Wards 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Holland & Norland Wards 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 3.90 0.90 Safer Neighbourhood Team Norland Ward 0.50 (0.50) 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 4.00 1.00 Safer Neighbourhood Team Notting Barns Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Pembridge Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Queen's Gate & Abingdon Wards 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 5.46 2.46 Safer Neighbourhood Team Redcliffe Ward 1.00 (1.00) 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Royal Hospital Ward 0.50 (0.50) 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team St Charles Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 6.00 3.00 Safer Neighbourhood Team Stanley Ward 0.50 (0.50) 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 3.96 0.96 BS - Kensington & Chelsea Borough Total 14.00 13.00 (1.00) 36.00 38.00 2.00 54.00 81.22 27.22 CW - Westminst Safer Neighbourhood Team Abbey Road Ward 1.00 (1.00) 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 1.00 (2.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Bayswater Ward 0.50 (0.50) 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Bryanston & Dorset Square Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.75 0.75 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Cavendish Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Chinatown & West End Ward 1.00 (1.00) 2.00 12.00 10.00 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Church Street Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 4.30 2.30 3.00 2.83 (0.17) Safer Neighbourhood Team Churchill Gardens Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 4.00 2.00 3.00 2.94 (0.06) Safer Neighbourhood Team Covent Garden Ward 1.00 (1.00) 2.00 4.33 2.33 3.00 3.67 0.67 Safer Neighbourhood Team Harrow Road Ward 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 4.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Hyde Park Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 3.36 0.36 Safer Neighbourhood Team Knightsbridge & Belgravia Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 4.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Lancaster Gate & Queensway Ward 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 2.00 - 6.00 6.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Little Venice Ward 0.50 (0.50) 2.00 1.00 (1.00) 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Maida Vale Ward 0.50 (0.50) 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Marylebone High Street Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 (2.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Mayfair & St James Ward 1.00 (1.00) 2.00 2.50 0.50 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Queens Park Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 4.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Regents Park Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 1.70 (0.30) 6.00 3.00 (3.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Soho Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 15.80 13.80 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Strand & Whitehall Ward 1.00 (1.00) 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 6.00 3.00 Safer Neighbourhood Team Support 1.00 (1.00) 2.00 6.00 4.00 3.00 (3.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Tachbrook Ward 0.50 (0.50) 2.00 4.00 2.00 3.00 2.89 (0.11) Safer Neighbourhood Team Vincent Square Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Warwick Ward 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Westbourne Ward 0.50 1.53 1.03 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 - CW - Westminster HQ Total 21.00 15.53 (5.47) 50.00 97.38 47.38 81.00 71.69 (9.31) EK - Camden B oSafer Neighbourhood Team Belsize Ward 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 1.00 (1.00) 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Bloomsbury Ward 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Camden Town & Primrose Hill Ward 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 6.68 4.68 3.00 4.00 1.00 Safer Neighbourhood Team Cantelowes Ward 0.50 (0.50) 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Fortune Green Ward 0.50 (0.50) 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Frognal & Fitzjohn Ward 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Gospel Oak Ward 1.00 (1.00) 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Hampstead Town Ward 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 1.00 (1.00) 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Haverstock Ward 1.00 (1.00) 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 1.00 (2.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Highgate Ward 1.00 (1.00) 2.00 1.00 (1.00) 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Holborn & Covent Garden Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.75 0.75 3.00 3.83 0.83 Safer Neighbourhood Team Kentish Town Ward 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Kilburn Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 5.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Kings Cross Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Regents Park Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team St Pancras & Somers Town Ward 1.00 (1.00) 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Swiss Cottage Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 1.00 (2.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team West Hampstead Ward 0.50 (0.50) 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 3.00 - EK - Camden Borough Total 14.00 12.00 (2.00) 36.00 46.43 10.43 54.00 45.83 (8.17) FH - Hammers mSafer Neighbourhood Team - Westfield Centre 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 5.00 3.00 3.00 (3.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Addison Ward 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Askew Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Avonmore & Brook Green 0.50 (0.50) 2.00 1.00 (1.00) 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team College Park and Old Oak Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.80 0.80 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Fulham Reach 0.50 (0.50) 2.00 1.00 (1.00) 3.00 (3.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Fulham Reach & North End Wards 1.00 0.90 (0.10) 2.00 (2.00) 3.00 (3.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Munster 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 1.00 (1.00) 3.00 1.00 (2.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team North End Ward 0.50 (0.50) 2.00 1.00 (1.00) 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Palace Riverside 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 0.86 (2.14) Safer Neighbourhood Team Parsons Green & Walham Ward 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 1.00 (2.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Ravenscourt Park Ward 1.00 (1.00) 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 4.00 1.00 Safer Neighbourhood Team Sands End Ward 0.50 (0.50) 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Shepherds Bush Green Ward 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 18.00 16.00 3.00 5.00 2.00 Safer Neighbourhood Team Town Ward 1.00 (1.00) 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 (3.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Wormholt & White City Ward 1.00 (1.00) 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 3.00 - FH - Hammersmith & Fulham Borough Total 12.00 9.90 (2.10) 32.00 46.80 14.80 48.00 26.86 (21.14) GD - Hackney B Safer Neighbourhood Team Brownswood Ward 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 (2.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Cazenove Ward 0.50 (0.50) 2.00 1.00 (1.00) 3.00 5.00 2.00 Safer Neighbourhood Team Chatham Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 1.00 (1.00) 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Clissold Ward 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Dalston Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 1.00 (1.00) 3.00 6.44 3.44 Safer Neighbourhood Team De Beauvoir Ward 1.00 (1.00) 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 (2.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Hackney Central Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 2.00 (1.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Hackney Downs Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 (3.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Haggerston Ward 1.00 (1.00) 2.00 1.00 (1.00) 3.00 1.00 (2.00) Safer Neighbourhood Team Hoxton Ward 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Kings Park Ward Page 0.50 1 1.00 0.50 2.00 2.00 - 3.00 3.00 - Safer Neighbourhood Team Leabridge Ward - - 2.00 1.00 (1.00) 3.00 1.67 (1.33) Safer Neighbourhood Teams - Target Strength vs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hackney Planning Watch Response to Proposed
    Hackney Planning Watch Response to Hackney Council on the proposal for the establishment of a Neighbourhood Forum covering the wards of Springfield, New River, Lordship and Cazenove January 2013 1 Introduction: These are our objections to the submitted proposal to formally designate the four wards: Springfield, New River, Lordship and Cazenove as a ‘Neighbourhood Forum’. As we understand it a group describing itself as the ‘Stamford Hill Neighbourhood Forum’ is seeking designation of four wards in Hackney (Springfield, New River, Lordship and Cazenove) as a ‘Neighbourhood Forum’. Hackney Planning Watch wishes to object in the strongest possible terms to this proposal. Although it will be evident from the four wards listed, the area proposed by the ‘Stamford Hill’ Neighbourhood Forum covers a much wider area than Stamford Hill and does in fact include Stoke Newington, Clissold Park and Upper Clapton. Hackney Planning Watch has a long history as a community organisation in the area. It was established over 15 years ago as a community group composed of local residents concerned about planning issues in Hackney, particularly the unlawful construction and the failure of the Council to deal properly with enforcement. In the last year some of our members have attempted to help build a cross-community alliance in order to develop a genuine consensual approach to the difficult planning issues in the area. These include, as well as enforcement issues, the lack of effective management of open space, protection of the environment, particularly in relation to drainage and tree preservation, and inadequate social infrastructure to meet the needs of the population.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Applications Determined Between 05/11/2018 and 11/11/2018
    PLANNING APPLICATIONS DETERMINED BETWEEN 05/11/2018 AND 11/11/2018 You can view copies online at www.merton.gov.uk/planningexplorer Please note that the details of tree applications and amendments to planning applications are not available for inspection, except on request at the Civic Centre. P L A N N I N G Environment and Regeneration Department, Merton Civic Centre, London Road, Morden, Surrey SM4 5DX. 1 of 8 Abbey Ward: Abbey AppNo.: 18/P3276 Case Officer: Richard Allen Date Received: 28/08/2018 Development 9 Griffiths Road Development APPLICATION FOR A LAWFUL DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATE IN Address: Wimbledon Description RESPECT OF THE PROPOSED ERECTION OF A SINGLE STOREY SIDE London AND REAR EXTENSION SW19 1SP Decision: Issue Certificate of Lawfulness Date 06/11/2018 Ward: Abbey AppNo.: 18/P3032 Case Officer: Aleks Pantazis Date Received: 31/07/2018 Development 8 Nelson Road Development ERECTION OF NEW REAR ROOF EXTENSION WITH INSULATED Address: South Wimbledon Description SHARED WALL, BI-FOLD DOORS AND A NEW ROOF London SW19 1HT Decision: Grant Permission subject to Conditions Date 08/11/2018 Applications decided in Abbey : 2 Cricket Green Ward: Cricket Green AppNo.: 18/P3492 Case Officer: Leigh Harrington Date Received: 14/09/2018 Development Mitcham Golf Club Development CONSTRUCTION OF 1 x PREFABRICATED STORAGE OUTHOUSE Address: Carshalton Road Description Mitcham CR4 4HN Decision: Grant Permission subject to Conditions Date 07/11/2018 Ward: Cricket Green AppNo.: 18/P3219 Case Officer: Tony Smith Date Received: 09/08/2018 Development War Memorial Development LISTED BUILDING CONSENT FOR THE ERECTION OF A WIRE FRAME Address: Lower Green Open Description SILHOUETTE STATUE WITHIN THE GATED AREA OF THE LOWER Space GREEN WAR MEMORIAL.
    [Show full text]
  • CHASE Residents' Association
    CHASE Residents’ Association Via: www.chaseresidents.org.uk CHASE Residents’ Association submission to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s consultation on proposed changes to ward boundaries within the London Borough of Croydon We wish to draw the Commission’s attention to difficulties that would be posed by putting into practice draft recommendations for changes to ward boundaries within the Addiscombe area of Croydon Central. We propose an alternative re-drawing of boundaries, a position we believe is in keeping with the views of a number of neighbouring residents’ associations and individuals. Established communities The notional boundaries of the “community” of Addiscombe are distinct from the present electoral ward of Addiscombe in that the community includes a sizeable part of the present Ashburton Ward. Addiscombe Road forms the southern boundary, in both electoral and community terms, for both wards. Residents of Fairfield Ward to the south do not identify with the community of Addiscombe. Within the current electoral wards of Addiscombe and Ashburton there is a more distinct community-based division between: • The western end, where residents living near East Croydon Station gravitate towards shops, schools, churches and facilities in the area between Cherry Orchard Road and Clyde Road. • The eastern side, where the Lower Addiscombe Road is the main district centre serving a community extending from east of Ashburton Park to Elgin Road to the west. Difficulties presented by the proposed boundaries Creating the proposed new wards of Addiscombe West & Park Hill and Addiscombe East by imposing an arbitrary border between Addiscombe/Ashburton and extending these wards south of Addiscombe Road would include areas with no natural affinity with Addiscombe.
    [Show full text]
  • CHATHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY Medway Chronicle 'Keeping Medway's History Alive'
    Number 17 – Spring 2021 CHATHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY Medway Chronicle 'Keeping Medway's History Alive' ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ Medway's Jewish Community ● Walter Brisac Chatham Town FC ● A “Custer Avenger” 1 CHATHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY meets at St Stephen©s Church, Maidstone Road, Chatham, ME4 6JE on the second Wednesday of each month except January and August. Doors open at 7:15pm and the meeting starts at 7:30pm. News and information about Chatham Historical Society is available on the website: http://chathamhistoricalsoc.chessck.co.uk Officers of the committee President Vacancy Chairman Len Feist Hon Secretary Catharina Clement Hon Treasurer Barry Meade MEDWAY CHRONICLE is published by Chatham Historical Society. Editor Christopher Dardry Contributors as credited throughout the magazine. Views expressed by contributors do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Society. Copyright remains with the authors. The Editor welcomes articles for inclusion in future issues of the Medway Chronicle. Please submit text and images in electronic form by email to [email protected] or on paper to the editor at any of the society©s meetings. (The editor prefers email.) The Medway Chronicle is produced with the financial support of MEDWAY COUNCIL. Front cover: Chatham Town FC. Winners of the 1935-36 Kent Amateur League. 2 Index Victor Chidgey...............................................................................................................................................4 The beginnings of the Medway Jewish community.......................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Merton Business Directory
    MERTON COUNCIL futureMerton From our easy to access offices, close to Wimbledon station, TWM Solicitors is an established law firm that has been advising people in the Wimbledon and Merton areas for generations. Wimbledon is one of six offices across South West London and Surrey that TWM has, making us one of the largest law firms in this area. We are accredited by the Merton Bu Law Society so you can be sure our service levels will be of the highest standard. s ine ss We provide a personal and professional service meeting people’s needs as individuals Directory as well as business law advice for companies and local organisations. Details about our full range of services can be found online at www.twmsolicitors.com. Alternatively, you can call and speak to a member of our team on a no cost, no obligation basis. Merton Business Directory www.merton.gov.uk/futureMerton www.twmsolicitors.com Businesses, get active! Working together for you and your Get the latest local business information direct to your desktop: family, in your everyday life. networking with your local businesses has never been easier or cheaper. Call now for your activation code and you can be up and marketing to a number of local businesses in as little as 10 minutes. 020 8773 3060 Want to get active? Level 1 activation allows you to: • Mail merge • Email merge • Print labels • Print reports Activate Level 1 for £150+VAT Want to keep up-to-date? Level 2 activation allows your data to be updated as businesses submit new Personal Injury | Immigration | Family Law | Employment Law information.
    [Show full text]
  • Unitarian Gothic: Rebuilding in Hackney in 1858 Alan Ruston 20
    istory• ,, VOLUME ONE In this issue - Pepys and Hackney: how Samuel and Elisabeth Pepys visited Hackney for rest and recreation - two ( or one and the same?) Homerton gardens visited by Pepys and Evelyn - The Tyssen family, Lords of the manor in Hackney since the 17th century-how Victorian nonconformists went shop­ ping for 'off the peg' church architecture- silk manufactur­ ers, the mentally afflicted, and Victorian orphans at Hackney Wick-the post-war development ofhigh-rise housing across the borough ... Hackney History is the new annual volume ofthe Friends of Hackney Archives. The Friends were founded in 1985 to act as a focus for local history in Hackney, and to support the work ofHackney Archives Department. As well as the annual volume they receive the Department's regular newsletter, The Hackney Terrier, and are invited to participate in visits, walks and an annual lecture. Hackney History is issued free ofcharge to subscribers to the Friends. In 1995 membership is£6 for the calendar year. For further details, please telephone O171 241 2886. ISSN 1360 3795 £3.00 'r.,,. free to subscribers HACKNEY History volume one About this publication 2 Abbreviations used 2 Pepys and Hackney Richard Luckett 3 The Mystery of Two Hackney Gardens Mike Gray 10 The Tyssens: Lords of Hackney Tim Baker 15 Unitarian Gothic: Rebuilding in Hackney in 1858 Alan Ruston 20 A House at Hackney Wick Isobel Watson 25 The Rise of the High-Rise: Housing in Post-War Hackney Peter Foynes 29 Contributors to this issue 36 Acknowledgements 36 THE FRIENDS OF HACKNEY ARCHIVES 1995 About this publication Hackney History is published by the Friends of Hackney Archives.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality in Croydon a Guide for Public Health
    AIR QUALITY IN CROYDON A GUIDE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS Air Quality Information for Public Health Professionals – London Borough of Croydon COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority September 2013 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4531 Air Quality Information for Public Health Professionals – London Borough of Croydon CONTENTS Description Page How to use this document 1 1 Introduction 2 2 Air Pollution 3 2.1 External air pollution 3 2.2 Internal air pollution 6 3 Air Quality in LB Croydon 8 4 Air quality impacts on health 12 4.1 Premature deaths 12 4.2 Vulnerable groups 13 4.3 Air pollution and deprivation 14 4.4 The Public Health Outcomes Framework 15 5 Health impacts in LB Croydon 17 6 Co-benefits of improving air quality in London 20 6.1 Maximising the health benefits from improving air quality 20 6.2 Cost of the impact of Air Pollution 21 7 Policy and legal framework for improving air quality 23 7.1 EU Directive 23 7.2 UK air quality policy 23 7.3 Regional strategies 24 7.4 Local Authority responsibilities 26 8 Taking action 27 8.1 Actions taken by the Mayor 27 8.2 Borough level action 28 8.3 Individual action 30 9 Next steps 32 10 References 33 11 Glossary 35 12 Appendices 40 Appendix 1 – Annual mean concentration of pollutants 40 Appendix 2 – National air quality objectives 41 Appendix 3 – Actions for Londoners to mitigate and adapt to air pollution 43 Air Quality Information for Public Health Professionals – London Borough of Croydon HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT Air quality is an important Public Health issue in London, it contributes to shortening the life expectancy of all Londoners, disproportionately impacting on the most vulnerable.
    [Show full text]
  • Authority Monitoring Report 2017-18
    MERTON COUNCIL futureMerton 2017/18 Authority Monitoring Report www.merton.gov.uk Context AMR 2017/18 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Planning policy updates and Local Development Scheme .................................................... 3 3. Merton in Numbers ....................................................................................................................... 6 4. Housing ........................................................................................................................................ 12 Starts, completions, five year supply and trajectory ................................................................. 12 Change of use from office to homes ........................................................................................... 20 Affordable housing .......................................................................................................... 23 Conversions, housing sizes and appeals ................................................................................... 25 5. Local Economy [to be updated]................................................................................................ 30 Retail vacancy rate, town centres and industrial areas ............................................................ 30 6. Local Environment ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Elections Handbook 2002 Complete
    LOCAL ELECTIONS HANDBOOK 2002 Colin Rallings & Michael Thrasher LOCAL ELECTIONS HANDBOOK 2002 The 2002 Local Election Results Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher with the assistance of Brian Cheal, Dawn Cole and Lawrence Ware Local Government Chronicle Elections Centre University of Plymouth Local Elections Handbook 2002 © Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher 2002 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission of the publishers. Published by the Local Government Chronicle Elections Centre, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA ISBN 0 948858 33 8 Distributed by: LGC Information, Greater London House, Hampstead Road, London, NW1 7EJ Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................v Using the Handbook ................................................................................................... xiv Aggregate Statistics for Local Authorities..................................................................... 1 London Borough Election Results ............................................................................... 13 Metropolitan Borough Election Results ....................................................................... 59 Unitary Council Election Results ................................................................................. 93 Shire
    [Show full text]
  • Local Resident Submissions to the London Borough of Croydon Electoral Review
    Local resident submissions to the London Borough of Croydon electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from residents in Croydon. The submissions from have been collated into one document. They have been sorted alphabetically, by surname. (L-Q) Maureen 2 Levy Colin Hart 1 Anthony 1 Harris Graham 1 Bass Simon Hoar 1 Anne Giles 1 Andy 1 Stranack Margaret 1 Bird Mario 2 Creatura Tim Pollard 2 Brian 1 Longman and Phil Thomas Scott Roche 1 Amy Pollard 1 Anthony 2 Pearson Gareth 1 Streeter Graeme 1 Fillmore Jonathan 1 Cope Lara Fish 1 Luke 1 Springthorpe Mark 1 Johnson Samir 1 Dwesar Sylvia 1 Macdonald Sarah Davis 1 Anthony 2 Pearson Alasdair 1 Stewart Badsha 1 Quadir Chris Philp 1 Chris Wright 1 Croydon 1 Conservativ e Group Dudley 1 Mead Fredeic 1 Demay Gavin 1 Barwell Helen 1 Pollard Jason 1 Cummings Lianne 1 Bruney Luke Clancy 1 Lynne Hale 1 Mario 2 Creatura Michael 1 Neal Mike Fisher 1 Richard 1 Chatterjee Robert 1 Sleeman Sara 1 Bashford Simon Brew 1 Sue Bennett 1 Tim Pollard 2 Yvette 1 Hopley Adam 1 O'Neill Adrian 1 Dennis Andrew 1 Frazer Ann Willard 1 Anthony 1 Sandford Catherine 1 Saunders Cheryl Purle 1 Christopher 1 King Croydon 1 South Labour Party David 1 Cantrell Deirdre Lea 1 Dennis King 1 Derek Lea 1 Diane 1 Hearne Elizabeth 1 Agyepong Fenella 1 Cardwell Gisela 1 James Janet 1 Stollery Jill Kilsby 1 Joseph 1 Rowe Kate Liffen 1 London 1 Borough of Croydon Maggie 2 Jackson Maggie 2 Jackson Martin 1 Wheatley Matthew 1 Taylor Michael 1 Bevington Paul Scott 1 Peter 1 Morgan Phil Reed 1 Philippa 1 Toogood Rita Barfoot 1 Sharon 1 Swaby Sheila 1 Childs Thornton 1 Heath Neighbourho od Association and BLP Toby 1 Keynes While consultation deadlines have prevented many of the organisations from making submissions, they have still taken steps to encourage their local members to respond, highlighting the way the draft recommendations run counter to local identities.
    [Show full text]
  • Lea Bridge Cycleway Consultation Report
    Appendix B Campaign 1 – text of submission and the 2 issues it contained Campaign 2 – text of submission and the 4 issues it contained Petition presented to us by Madina 11 Mosque Trust Petition presented to us at a public drop- 12 in event Summaries of stakeholder responses 13 Code frames 16 1 Campaign 1 – text of submission and the issues we identified from it We identified the following issues in Campaign 1: Will increase traffic on other streets Not good for the environment/ will increase pollution Concerns about crime/bike theft Will not be safe at night Will have a negative impact on Lea Bridge Road (more traffic/usage) Do not narrow road space/close roads/redirect traffic - unspecified Negative impact for businesses (deliveries/losing customers/money) Negative impact for drivers/motorists (unpleasant/not safer) Negative impact for local residents (unpleasant/not safer) Negative impact for people going to Madina Mosque/places of worship (will prevent attendance, parking restrictions) Negative impact for people with disabilities (unpleasant/not safer) Learn from past mistakes/how bad the last proposal turned out Loss of parking spaces Should improve infrastructure/traffic system on other roads (e.g. Dunlace, Blurton, Elderfield, Rushmore) Should improve public transport instead (more bus lanes/bus technology/cheaper fares) The verbatim text is below. To Sadiq Khan - Mayor of London 8th November 2019 Transport for London Diane Abbott - MP Margaret Gordon, Ian Rathbone, Deniz Oguzkanli – Councillors for Lea Bridge Ward Re: Letter In Protest Against The Planned Cycle Lane on Lea Bridge Road London E5 Dear Sirs/Madam, I’m a concerned resident on Lea Bridge road & I’m writing to protest against the planned cycle lane along Lea Bridge Road / Clapton Roundabout / Kenninghall Road.
    [Show full text]
  • East Croydon Community Organisation Public Meeting Minutes
    East Croydon Community Organisation public meeting minutes 2 December 2015 1 Welcome Esther Sutton welcomed guests & ECCO members to the meeting, outlined the agenda and asked if members could make donations to help cover the costs of hiring the hall and printing the leaflets. About 25 people attended. 2 Croydon Councillor Sean Fitzsimons outlined what was being consulted on and how to make a Local Plan comment. The deadline for comments was 18 December 2015. Revision consultation If Councils and local communities want to have a say in local planning decisions, they need to have robust and up to date local planning documents, that conform to central government and Mayor of London guidance. They must be able to withstand scrutiny from the government appointed Planning Inspector. There are three documents to comment on. • The Croydon Local Plan: Strategic Policies Partial Review (Preferred and Alternative Options) - www.croydon.gov.uk/localplanone (Originally agreed 2013, comments on tracked changes only) • The Croydon Local Plan: Detailed Policies and Proposals. (Preferred and Alternative Options) –www.croydon.gov.uk/localplantwo (new, can comment on the whole document) • The Croydon Local Plan: Policies Map Changes. www.croydon.gov.uk/policiesmap (new, helps explains the previous documents in graphical form) The Croydon Local Plan: Strategic Policies Partial Review (Preferred and Alternative Options) In 2013, the previous Council administration agreed the draft Croydon Local Plan: Strategic Policies which set out the following: • 20,200
    [Show full text]