Background Paper on Protecting Children from Bullying and Cyberbullying
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Impact of Cyber-Bullying on Young People's Mental Health Online Questionnaire
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Anglia Ruskin Research Online The impact of cyber-bullying on young people’s mental health Final Report November 2010 Niamh O’Brien Researcher Faculty of Health and Social Care Anglia Ruskin University Dr Tina Moules Director of Research Faculty of Health and Social Care Anglia Ruskin University Corresponding author : Niamh O’Brien Department of Community and Family Studies Faculty of Health and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, 2nd Floor William Harvey Building Bishop Hall Lane, Chelmsford, CM1 1SQ. Tel: 0845 196 4197 E-mail: [email protected] Table of contents Acknowledgements..........................................................................................4 Glossary table...................................................................................................5 1. Introduction...................................................................................................6 2. Cyber-bullying in the literature....................................................................9 2.1 Introduction...................................................................................................9 2.2 What is ‘traditional’ bullying? ......................................................................10 2.3 What is cyber-bullying?...............................................................................10 2.4 Cyber-bullying and young people ...............................................................11 2.5 What -
Useful Anti-Bullying Websites and Organisations
Useful Anti-Bullying Websites and Organisations Actionwork Actionwork organises anti-bullying tours and events all over the UK including the Annual National anti www.actionwork.com Bullying Roadshow and anti-bullying creative sessions throughout the UK Anti-Bullying The new Network will have the following objectives: to support anti-bullying work in schools; to operate www.antibullying.net Network a website providing information about bullying and how it can be tackled; to research and develop effective strategies to address the verbal, psychological and physical harassment and violence called bullying; to promote research into bullying and support work seeking to reduce bullying; and to operate an anti-bullying service which will include the provision of training, publications and consultancy services. Anti-Bullying The Anti-Bullying Alliance (ABA) was founded by NSPCC and National Children's Bureau in 2002. The www.anti- Alliance Alliance brings together 65 organisations into one network with the aim of reducing bullying and bullyingalliance.org creating safer environments in which children and young people can live, grow, play and learn. Beatbullying Beatbullying is the UK first children's charity to devise anti-bullying strategies for young people by www.beatbullying.org young people. They strongly believe that young people have the ability to shape society - a society in which bullying is unacceptable. BullyingUK Bullying UK is the new name for the award-winning charity Bullying Online which was founded in 1999 www.bullying.co.uk by journalist Liz Carnell from Harrogate and her son John, as a direct result of their experience of dealing with school bullying, which included taking successful legal action against an education authority. -
Worldwide Privacy Regulations Restricting Access to Genealogical Records Jan Meisels Allen
IAJGS 38th International Conference on Jewish Genealogy August 6, 2018 Warsaw, Poland Worldwide Privacy Regulations Restricting Access to Genealogical Records Jan Meisels Allen Genealogists without records can’t do genealogy! We are facing crises worldwide on access to vital records due to misunderstandings by those in power about identity theft and fraud and due to budget cuts Privacy Someone's right to keep their personal matters and relationships secret Why Do We Care About Privacy? There are many people who value their privacy, and wouldn't dream of posting personal information about themselves or their family where everyone can see it. Some of those people are my cousins, and some of them are your cousins - but how could you and I hope to connect with them online given their concerns? Do You Want Your Information Available to Everyone? We want others to provide information to us. Do we want our personal information posted to the Internet? European Union Members 28 Countries Austria Belgium Bulgaria Czech Croatia Cyprus Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Poland Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Until 3-29- United Kingdom 2019 European Union - 2 • 28 Countries until BREXIT takes place - 29 March 2019 • 500 million residents • Right to be forgotten/erased • Google has ~90% of Search Engine Market in Europe-varies by country • Since May 29, 2014 Google received 698,395 requests to delink from 2,615,742 URLs. They did not remove 44 percent of the URLs requested. • Fall 2016 CJEU ruled hyperlinking by third-party website (search engine) without consent of holder constitutes a "communication to the public“ and doing so is a violation of EU copyright directive. -
Video Surveillance in Norway and Denmark
On the Threshold to Urban Panopticon? Analysing the Employment of CCTV in European Cities and Assessing its Social and Political Impacts RTD-Project (September 2001 – February 2004) 5th Framework Programme of the European Commission Contract No.: HPSE-CT2001-00094 [email protected] www.urbaneye.net Working Paper No. 4 Restrictive? Permissive? The Contradictory Framing of Video Surveillance in Norway and Denmark Carsten Wiecek & Ann Rudinow Sætnan [email protected] [email protected] Department of Sociology and Political Science Norwegian University of Science and Technology Dragvoll, 7491 Trondheim, Norway March 2002 Project Co-ordination: Centre for Technology and Society Technical University Berlin www.ztg.tu-berlin.de Urbaneye: Video Surveillance in Norway and Denmark 1 Table of Content TABLE OF CONTENT ......................................................................................................... 1 1 INTRODUCTION -- WHY TWO COUNTRIES? ..........................................................2 2 INTRODUCING NORWAY AND DENMARK.............................................................3 2.1 CCTV IN NORWAY AND DENMARK............................................................................ 6 2.2 OPEN STREET SYSTEMS AND THE ROLE OF THE POLICE ................................................. 9 3 LEGAL FRAMEWORK ..............................................................................................11 3.1 LEGAL STRUCTURES AND TEXTS.................................................................................12 -
Cyber Bullying
Cyber-Bullying Policy THIS POLICY IS REVIEWED ON AN ANNUAL BASIS by Dene Bright and Johannes Bodenstein Review date: September 2019 Policy actioned from: September 2019 – August 2020 Next review date: September 2020 Please note: ‘School’ refers to Reach British School; ‘parents’ refers to parents, guardians and carers. Reach British School embraces the advantages of modern technology in terms of the educational benefits it brings, however, the school is mindful of the potential for bullying to occur. Central to the School’s anti-bullying policy is the belief that ‘all pupils have a right not to be bullied’ and that ‘bullying is always unacceptable’. The School also recognises that it must ‘take note of bullying perpetrated outside School which spills over into the School’. Definition of Cyber-Bullying Cyber-bullying is an aggressive, intentional act carried out by a group or individual using electronic forms of contact repeatedly over time against a victim who cannot easily defend himself/herself. By cyber-bullying, we mean bullying by electronic media such as: Bullying by texts or messages or calls on mobile phones The use of mobile phone cameras to cause distress, fear or humiliation Posting threatening, abusive, defamatory or humiliating material on websites, to include blogs, personal websites, social networking sites Using e-mail to message others Hijacking/cloning e-mail accounts Making threatening, abusive, defamatory or humiliating remarks in chat rooms, to include, but not limited to Facebook, Bebo, Youtube and Ratemyteacher Legal Issues Cyber-bullying is generally criminal in character. There are laws in the UAE that apply to cyberspace: It is unlawful to disseminate defamatory information in any media including internet sites. -
Cyberbullying Behind Frontiers Deviant Behaviours and Intercultural
UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI MILANO-BICOCCA Progetto QUA_SI Corso di Dottorato in Società dell’Informazione CYBERBULLYING BEHIND FRONTIERS: Deviant Behaviours and Intercultural Factors in Digital Communication Tutor: chiar. mo prof. Davide Diamantini Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione Tesi di dottorato di: Giulia MURA Matricola n° 042124 Ciclo XVIII (VI) Anno Accademico 2010/2011 Università di Milano-Bicocca – Progetto QUA_SI, Dottorato in Società dell’Informazione A. A. 2010/11 Tesi di Dottorato di Giulia Mura: “Cyberbullying behind frontiers” Sommario Cyberbullying behind frontiers: ................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 4 1 Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue ...................... 7 1.1 Youth and ICT diffusion .......................................................................................... 11 1.2 Bullying and cyberbullying ........................................................................................ 15 1.3 Cyberbullying, not just bullying! ............................................................................. 21 2 Looking for explanations… .............................................................................................. 28 2.1 Man will always be man: the cross cultural research ............................................. 28 2.2 You talkin’ to me? Computer mediated -
The Proliferation of Video Surveillance in Brussels and Copenhagen
TOWARDS THE PANOPTIC CITY THE PROLIFERATION OF VIDEO SURVEILLANCE IN BRUSSELS AND COPENHAGEN This master thesis has been co-written by Corentin Debailleul and Pauline De Keersmaecker 4Cities UNICA Euromaster in Urban Studies 2012-2014 Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Supervisor : Mathieu Van Criekingen (Université Libre de Bruxelles) Second reader : Henrik Reeh (Københavns Universitet) Hence the major effect of the Panopticon: to induce in the inmate a state of conscious and permanent visibility that assures the automatic functioning of power. So to arrange things that the surveillance is permanent in its effects, even if it is discontinuous in its action; that the perfection of power should tend to render its actual exercise unnecessary; that this architectural apparatus should be a machine for creating and sustaining a power relation independent of the person who exercises it; in short, that the inmates should be caught up in a power situation of which they are themselves the bearers. To achieve this, it is at once too much and too little that the prisoner should be constantly observed by an inspector: too little, for what matters is that he knows himself to be observed; too much, because he has no need in fact of being so. In view of this, Bentham laid down the principle that power should be visible and unverifiable. Visible: the inmate will constantly have before his eyes the tall outline of the central tower from which he is spied upon. Unverifiable: the inmate must never know whether he is being looked at at any one moment; but he must be sure that he may always be so. -
Wrekin College Anti-Bullying and Peer-On-Peer Abuse Policies
WREKIN COLLEGE ANTI-BULLYING AND PEER-ON-PEER ABUSE POLICIES ANTI-BULLYING AND PEER-ON-PEER ABUSE POLICIES Contents Part 1: Anti-Bullying Policy 4 Part 2: Peer-on-Peer Abuse Policy 12 Appendix 1: The School’s Code of Conduct (Pupils) 17 Appendix 2: Specific School Rules 18 Appendix 3: Peer-on-Peer Abuse Flow Chart 20 This document was created in July 2015 to bring together a number of existing policies. This policy and guidelines needs to be read alongside other school documentation including: • Behaviour, Rewards and Sanctions Policy (includes the Use of Reasonable Force and Physical Restraint Policy) • Code of Conduct for All Staff and Governors • Complaints Policy and Procedure • Controlled Drugs and Misuse of Substances Policy • Conducting Interviews, Searches and Confiscation Policy and Procedures • Data Protection Policy (Confidentiality of Information) • E-Safety and Online Safety Policies • Equality and Diversity Policy • Games and Sporting Activities Policy and Guidelines • Health and Safety Policy • Health and Wellbeing Centre and First Aid Policy • Missing Pupil Policy • PSHEE Policy and Programme • Risk Assessment Policy • Safeguarding and Child Protection Policy and Guidelines • Welfare and Health Policies - Pupils (includes Alcohol and Smoking Policies) • Wellbeing and Mental Health Policies and Guidelines - Pupils (includes depression, self-harm, eating disorders and suicide intervention) • Whistleblowing Policy Other relevant documentation: § Boarding Mission Statement (available on the school’s website, printed in the Parents’ Handbook and House Handbooks) § Keeping Children Safe In Education - September 2019 § Boarding Schools National Minimum Standards - April 2015 § Parents’ Handbook § The School’s Aims and Code of Conduct § The Student Planner The senior member of staff with overall responsibility for all behavioural issues within the school is Deputy Head (Pastoral)/Designated Safeguarding Lead (DSL) for Safeguarding and Child Protection. -
87% of Parents Reported That Their Child Has Been Bullied in The
Need more information? www.bullying.co.uk www.kidshealth.org www.childline.org.uk www.kidscape.org.uk www.anti- bullyingalliance.org.uk www.nspcc.org.uk For www.stopbullying.gov students Leaflet created in 2014 by the Bedford Borough Youth Cabinet campaign group. For 87% of parents reported that more information please email [email protected] their child has been bullied in the past 12 months Scenario 1 (www.beatbullying.org statistic) Your Friend is being bullied at school. Do you…. A tell a teacher B stay with your friend C ignore the situation What is bullying? How can you see What can you do Verbal abuse signs of bullying? if your friend is Isolation being bullied? Cyber bullying Skipping school Being scared Threatening Tell a teacher / Physical abuse Being frightened Isolating themselves member of staff Tell your parents 69% of children in the UK Being upset or being Tell a person you trust report being bullied angry (www.beatbullying.org statistic) Stay with them and be 20% reported bullying others a good friend In Bedford Borough in (www.beatbullying.org statistic) 2012/13 there was a survey 85% have witnessed bullying (www.beatbullying.org statistic) carried out and 90% of 1 in 3 young people who people said it was wrong to experience bullying truant 82% have tried to stop the be threatened from school (www.beatbullying.org statistic) bullying they have seen (www.beatbullying.org statistic) 83% of people have been verbally abused C – You ignore your friend so they have B – You stayed with them and the bullying A – You told a teacher so the bullying has been bullied so much they have dropped out has died down but not stopped stopped and you are really good friends of school . -
Wrekin College Anti-Bullying Policy Definition
WREKIN COLLEGE ANTI-BULLYING POLICY (This policy applies to all pupils) This policy should be read in conjunction with Standard 12 of the National Minimum Standards for Boarding Schools, Promoting Positive Behaviour and Relationships, and Standard 11 of the National Minimum Standards for Boarding schools, Child Protection. Standard 12 states: 12.1 The school has and consistently implements a written policy to promote good behaviour amongst pupils. This policy includes: • measures to combat bullying and to promote positive behaviour; • school rules; • disciplinary sanctions; when restraint is to be used; and • arrangements for searching pupils and their possessions. 12.2 The policy complies with relevant legislation and guidance and is understood by staff and pupils. This policy is published on the school’s website and in the Student Planner. The school takes bullying very seriously. The governors and staff recognise the contribution it makes to safeguarding children. We recognise that all staff have a full and active part to play in protecting our pupils from harm. At Wrekin we create a culture and communication network where young people are easily able to confide to staff if they are being bullied. DEFINITION Bullying will not be tolerated in any form and is defined to mean: “Deliberate hurtful behaviour repeated over a period of time and in circumstances where it is difficult for those being bullied to defend themselves”. Bullying can take the form of physical actions, words (written or verbal, including words communicated electronically) or being excluded from a group for various improper reasons. Bullying, whether physical or mental, is completely unacceptable and the strongest possible action will be taken against anyone at Wrekin found guilty of such behaviour. -
Downloaded Verbatim from the Online Survey Output and Initially Collated by Which Data Collection Survey Question Elicited the Comment
Scott et al. BMC Family Practice (2016) 17:116 DOI 10.1186/s12875-016-0517-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Young people who are being bullied – do they want general practice support? Emma Scott1* , Jeremy Dale1, Rachel Russell1 and Dieter Wolke2 Abstract Background: Childhood bullying is a major risk factor for health, education and social relationships, with effects persisting into adulthood. It affects half of all children at some point, with 10–14 % experiencing bullying that lasts for years. With the advent of cyberbullying, it can happen at all times and places. There have been calls for GPs to take a more active role in identifying and supporting young people who are being bullied. This paper explores young people’s and parents’ opinions about whether general practice should be involved in identifying and supporting young people who are being bullied. Methods: Two hundred six young people (85.9 % female, mean ± sd age 16.2 ± 3.2 years) and 44 parents were recruited through established bullying charity websites and their social media channels to complete an online questionnaire comprising multiple-choice questions and unlimited narrative responses. Questionnaire responses were analysed by age and gender using descriptive statistics. A descriptive analysis of the narrative responses was undertaken and key themes identified. Results: Young people (90.8 %) and parents (88.7 %) thought it was important for GPs to be better able to recognise and help young people who are being bullied. Most recognised the link between bullying and health. The doctor’s independence was seen as advantageous. Young people preferred completing a screening questionnaire to disclose experience of being bullied than being asked directly. -
Stalking Laws and Implementation Practices: a National Review for Policymakers and Practitioners
The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Stalking Laws and Implementation Practices: A National Review for Policymakers and Practitioners Author(s): Neal Miller Document No.: 197066 Date Received: October 24, 2002 Award Number: 97-WT-VX-0007 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Institute for Law and Justice 1018 Duke Street Alexandria, Virginia 22314 Phone: 703-684-5300 Fax: 703-739-5533 i http://www. ilj .org -- PROPERTY OF National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). t'Y- Box 6000 Rockville, MD 20849-6000 fl-- Stalking Laws and Implementation Practices: A 0 National Review for Policymakers and Practitioners Neal Miller October 2001 Prepared under a grant from the National Institute of Justice to the Institute for Law and Justice (ILJ), grant no. 97-WT-VX-0007 Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Justice or ILJ. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.