DOCSLIB.ORG

Town of Elkton Comprehensive Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Town of Elkton Comprehensive Plan 2010 Town of Elkton Comprehensive Plan TOWN OF ELKTON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN January 2010 2010 Town of Elkton Comprehensive Plan Acknowledgements The Town of Elkton Planning Commission expresses its appreciation to the many people, agencies and organizations that provided information, ideas and input for this plan. Town of Elkton Mayor and Commissioners Joseph Fisona, Mayor Charles Givens Mary Jo Jablonski Earl Piner Sr. Gary Storke Town of Elkton Planning Commission David Wiseman, Chair Fred Thomas, Vice Chair Brad Carrillo Asma Manejwala Donna Short Sue Whitaker Department of Planning Jeanne Minner, Director Terri Thomas, Planner Contributing Town Agencies Lewis George, J. Craig Trostle, Jr. Town Administrator Building Director & Zoning Administrator Consultant Assistance Environmental Resources Management, Annapolis, Maryland Special thanks to Melissa Appler, Jason DuBow and John Leocha at the Maryland Department of Planning, Mike Nixon at the Maryland Department of Transportation, Tony Hofmann of Michael Baker Inc., Brigid Kenney and Janice Outen at the Maryland Department of the Environment, David Nemazie at the University of Maryland’s Center for Environmental Science, and Daniel Blevins and David Gula at the Wilmington Area Planning Council Financial assistance provided by the Wilmington Area Planning Council (WILMAPCO) and the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. This Plan was prepared by the Town of Elkton under award number NA08NOS4190469 from the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (OCRM), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), through the Maryland Department of Natural Resources Chesapeake and Coastal Program. The statements, findings, conclusions and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or the United States Department of Commerce. Town Commissioners Resolution Planning Commission Resolution ii 2010 Town of Elkton Comprehensive Plan Table of Contents Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................... ii Town Commissioners Resolution .............................................................................................. ii Planning Commission Resolution .............................................................................................. ii Table of Contents...................................................................................................................... iii Tables.........................................................................................................................................v Maps.......................................................................................................................................... vi 1. Introduction....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1. Legal Requirements ................................................................................................................1-1 1.2. Plan Preparation......................................................................................................................1-2 2. Background ................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1. Location, Regional Setting, Government .................................................................................2-1 2.2. History .....................................................................................................................................2-1 2.3. Related Plans and Documents ................................................................................................2-3 2.4. Plan Incorporated by Reference..............................................................................................2-3 2.5. Elkton’s Future.........................................................................................................................2-3 3. Municipal Growth........................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1. Growth Trends.........................................................................................................................3-1 3.2. The Plan for Future Growth .....................................................................................................3-2 3.3. Distribution of Future Growth...................................................................................................3-5 3.4. Annexation Areas ....................................................................................................................3-6 3.5. Impacts of Growth on Community Facilities and Services.......................................................3-9 3.6. Financing of Infrastructure Expansions .................................................................................3-12 3.7. Rural Buffer ...........................................................................................................................3-13 3.8. Burdens on Municipally Provided Services beyond Proposed Municipal Growth Area..........3-13 3.9. Protection of Sensitive Areas in and Near Elkton ..................................................................3-13 3.10. Relationship of Long Term Development to Elkton’s Character ............................................3-13 4. Land Use ....................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1. Goals and Objectives ..............................................................................................................4-1 4.2. Existing Land Use....................................................................................................................4-1 4.3. Land Use Issues......................................................................................................................4-4 4.4. Proposed Land Use.................................................................................................................4-5 4.5. Urban Design Framework Plan..............................................................................................4-10 4.6. Overlay Districts ....................................................................................................................4-12 4.7. Policies and Actions ..............................................................................................................4-13 5. Water Resources........................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1. Goals and Objectives ..............................................................................................................5-1 5.2. Interjurisdictional Cooperation .................................................................................................5-1 5.3. Drinking Water Assessment ....................................................................................................5-1 5.4. Water System Capacity ...........................................................................................................5-2 5.5. Additional Drinking Water Resources ......................................................................................5-4 5.6. Other Drinking Water Considerations ......................................................................................5-5 iii 2010 Town of Elkton Comprehensive Plan 5.7. Wastewater Analysis ...............................................................................................................5-6 5.8. WWTP Upgrades.....................................................................................................................5-6 5.9. Point Source Nutrient Caps .....................................................................................................5-9 5.10. Nonpoint Source Analysis .....................................................................................................5-10 5.11. Total Nutrient Loads and Assimilative Capacity.....................................................................5-11 5.12. Choice of Land Use Plan.......................................................................................................5-15 5.13. Policies and Actions ..............................................................................................................5-15 6. Sensitive Areas.............................................................................................................. 6-1 6.1. Goals and Objectives ..............................................................................................................6-1 6.2. Inventory of Environmentally Sensitive Areas..........................................................................6-1 6.3. Chesapeake Bay Critical Area.................................................................................................6-8 6.4. Mineral Resources...................................................................................................................6-9 6.5. Policies and Actions ................................................................................................................6-9 7. Transportation ............................................................................................................... 7-1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marcus Hook Borough Comprehensive Plan Task Force in the Preparation of This Document
    COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MARCUS HOOK BOROUGH Delaware County, Pennsylvania 2002 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE BOROUGH OF MARCUS HOOK OCTOBER 7, 2002 Prepared for the citizens of the Borough of Marcus Hook by the Delaware County Planning Department This project was financed in part with funding from the Community Development Block Grant Program under Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, P.L. 93-383 (as amended). Printed on Recycled Paper The logo was approved by Borough Council on February 3, 1992. It was designed to represent the overall character, culture, and history of Marcus Hook and incorporates the Borough’s motto “The Cornerstone of Pennsylvania.” The diamond shape represents the quality in the Borough. The Municipal Building façade was chosen as a unique Marcus Hook landmark. The people in front of it represent the diverse community support and the public/private partnerships which have contributed to the vitality of the Borough. The sunburst at the top shows the bright and promising future ahead. Wrapping the two sides are sycamore trees which are native to the Borough and reflect the new growth, attention to the environment, and concern for the beautification of the community. The straight and wavy stars and stripes lend a patriotic feel. The waves represent Marcus Hook’s proud beginning as a waterfront settlement. The five stars refer to the five star quality of life as well as the five war memorials throughout the Borough. BOROUGH OF MARCUS HOOK COUNCIL Albert Argentine, President Mervin Boyer, Vice President Jack Frieze Anthony Gallo Bernard W. Gallo Arthur Sutherland Joan Sylvester MAYOR George A.
    [Show full text]
  • Returning the American Eel to the Susquehanna River
    Returning the American Eel to the Susquehanna River ph ot o- Jo sh D . T r y n in e w s k by Josh D. Tryninewski i Fisheries Biologist PFBC Anadromous Fish Restoration Unit photo-USFWS The Susquehanna River once supported tremendous numbers of a long-lived and highly migratory fish that looked more like a snake than a fish. The American Eel (Anguilla rostrata) with its slimy, slender, elongated body, slithering movements, and reclusive and nocturnal lifestyle can conjure up feelings of fright and disgust to the unsuspecting angler. However, the misunderstood American Eel has a complex and fascinating life history with environmental importance that has gained A Normandeau appreciation, understanding and a refreshed restoration focus Associates Biologist counts American in recent years. photo-Josh Tryninewski The American Eel is a catadromous fish that requires access Eels at the Conowingo to both freshwater and marine environments to complete its Dam eel collection facility. life cycle. The entire population, which ranges from Greenland to northern South America, spawns in the Sargasso Sea. Young eels are then transported by ocean currents to the Atlantic Unfortunately, historical abundance was severely impacted Coast, where the eels move into estuaries and freshwater rivers by human activities, mainly dam building. Since the early to grow and mature. Juvenile eels are around 2- to 3-years- 1900s, the lower Susquehanna River has been harnessed by old and 4- to 6-inches in length when migration into the four large hydroelectric dams. While providing electricity to Susquehanna River begins. However, when mature, adult eels many communities, the dams effectively closed the river to may be 7- to 40-years-old and 3- to 5-feet in length.
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna Riyer Drainage Basin
    'M, General Hydrographic Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 109 Series -j Investigations, 13 .N, Water Power, 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR HYDROGRAPHY OF THE SUSQUEHANNA RIYER DRAINAGE BASIN BY JOHN C. HOYT AND ROBERT H. ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1 9 0 5 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittaL_.__.______.____.__..__.___._______.._.__..__..__... 7 Introduction......---..-.-..-.--.-.-----............_-........--._.----.- 9 Acknowledgments -..___.______.._.___.________________.____.___--_----.. 9 Description of drainage area......--..--..--.....-_....-....-....-....--.- 10 General features- -----_.____._.__..__._.___._..__-____.__-__---------- 10 Susquehanna River below West Branch ___...______-_--__.------_.--. 19 Susquehanna River above West Branch .............................. 21 West Branch ....................................................... 23 Navigation .--..........._-..........-....................-...---..-....- 24 Measurements of flow..................-.....-..-.---......-.-..---...... 25 Susquehanna River at Binghamton, N. Y_-..---...-.-...----.....-..- 25 Ghenango River at Binghamton, N. Y................................ 34 Susquehanna River at Wilkesbarre, Pa......_............-...----_--. 43 Susquehanna River at Danville, Pa..........._..................._... 56 West Branch at Williamsport, Pa .._.................--...--....- _ - - 67 West Branch at Allenwood, Pa.....-........-...-.._.---.---.-..-.-.. 84 Juniata River at Newport, Pa...-----......--....-...-....--..-..---.-
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Buses: a Case Study of the Delaware Authority For
    LIFE-CYCLE COST AND EMISSIONS ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVE- FUEL BUSES: A CASE STUDY OF THE DELAWARE AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSIT (DART) by Amirhossein Shahpar A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Civil Engineering Summer 2010 Copyright 2010 Amirhossein Shahpar All Rights Reserved LIFE-CYCLE COST AND EMISSIONS ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVE- FUEL BUSES: A CASE STUDY OF THE DELAWARE AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSIT (DART) by Amirhossein Shahpar Approved: __________________________________________________________ Ardeshir Faghri, Ph.D. Professor in charge of thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved: __________________________________________________________ Harry Shenton III, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Approved: __________________________________________________________ Michael Chajes, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Engineering Approved: __________________________________________________________ Debra Hess Norris, M.S. Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Ardeshir Faghri for his encouragement, patience, and guidance throughout the course of my graduate study. His comments and advice not only helped me to stay on track but also assisted me to get the most out of my time at the University of Delaware. I would like to thank Mr. Mark Glaze, Delaware Department of Transportation’s project manager and Mr. Brett Taylor, Delaware Department of Transportation’s financial and legislative policy advisor, for their comments and suggestions on my research work. I am thankful for Mr. Stephen Kingsberry, Executive Director of DART, for his patience and providing the necessary information for this study. His advice also was invaluable and helped me to make right assumptions whenever needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Julrec99.Pdf
    July 1999 ForFor thethe RecordRecord Oil operation permit for sludge solidification permit TAMKO ROOFING PRODUCTS, INC. - 4500 The following is a list of PHIPPS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS, OTTIS E. BREEDING , SR. – Denton, MD Tamko Drive, Frederick, MD 21701. (TR MDE’s permiting activity from - 4300 Shannon Drive, Baltimore, MD 21213. (89-SP-0332) Application received for a 5447) Received an air permit to construct for a May 15 - June 15, 1999 (TR 5452) Received an air permit to construct renewal of a surface mine permit on Route 313 modification to an existing storage tank area for one concrete crusher For information on these PROFESSIONAL DISPOSAL SERVICES, INC. Carroll County Garrett County permits, please call MDE’s - 7107 Commercial Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21237. (99-OPX-2597) Oil operation permit Environmental Permits Service RONALD YOHN FARM - Wentz Road, HARBISON-WALKER REFRACTORIES - for sludge solidification Manchester, MD 21102. Sewage sludge 16306 Bittinger Road, Grantsville, MD 21536. Center at (410) 631-3772. STRATUS PETROLEUM CORPORATION - application on agricultural land (1999-11-00026) Air quality permit to operate 3100 Vera Street, Baltimore City, MD 21226. JENKINS DEVELOPMENT CO., - Applications Received (99-ODS-3487) Surface water discharge for oil Cecil County Lonaconing, MD (SM-87-411) Application terminal received for significant modification. U.S. TAG & LABEL COMPANY - 2208 HARBOUR VIEW WASTE WATER TREAT- Aisquith Street, Baltimore, MD 21218. (TR Allegany County MENT PLANT - Dartmouth Road, Chesa- 5426) Received an air permit to construct for Harford County peake City, MD 21915. (99DP0496) Surface one heat-set web printing press AMCELLE RF - Route 220, Cumberland, MD municipal discharge permit 21502.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESERVING ISSUE 02 SUMMER 2019 Pennsylvaniathe Newsletter Dedicated to Preserving Pennsylvania’S Historic Places
    VOLUME 32 PRESERVING ISSUE 02 SUMMER 2019 PENNSYLVANIAThe Newsletter Dedicated to Preserving Pennsylvania’s Historic Places www.preservationpa.org AWARDS SELECTION COMMITTEE Thank you to these individuals for their service on this year’s judging panel. Ira Beckerman, Archaeologist Pennsylvania Historic Preservation Board Justin Detwiler, Architect John Milner Architects Valerie Metzler, Archivist Preservation Pennsylvania Board Jane Sheffield Heritage PA, Allegheny Ridge Corporation Mary Tate Pennsylvania Downtown Center The Honor Award recipients are selected by Preservation Pennsylvania’s board of directors. HONOR AWARDS F. Otto Haas Award sponsored by A. Roy Smith JUNE 19, 2019 Henry A. Jordan Award sponsored by WILSON COLLEGE Mrs. Henry A. Jordan CHAMBERSBURG, PENNSYLVANIA SPECIAL FOCUS AWARD Ralph Modjeski Award sponsored by Modjeski and Masters TomKEYNOTE Mayes, National Trust forSPEAKER Historic Preservation Author of Why Old Places Matter LANDMARK SPONSORS Column Level The Colebrookdale Railroad Greenhouse Renovation Services, Inc. SgRArchitects TranSystems Foundation Level Kautter & Kelley Architects Mills + Schnoering Architects, LLC Preservation Alliance for Greater Philadelphia Warehaus THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSORS, MEMBERS, DONORS AND ALL THE PASSIONATE PRESERVATIONISTS WHO MAKE A DIFFERENCE EVERY DAY! Preservation Pennsylvania gratefully acknowledges our generous individual and corporate sponsors of the 2019 Pennsylvania Historic Preservation Awards. (This list reflects individual and corporate support received as of the printing date.) 2 ABOUT Preservation Pennsylvania is the commonwealth’s only statewide, private, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of historically and architecturally significant properties. The organization was created in 1982 as the Preservation Fund of Pennsylvania to MISSION operate a revolving fund that would assist in the acquisition and rehabilitation of Preservation Pennsylvania – through creative historic properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution No
    RESOLUTION NO. 1154-20 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE 2019 HARFORD COUNTY ANNUAL GROWTH REPORT WHEREAS, Chapter 759 of the Laws of Maryland: the Smart Growth and Neighborhood Conservation Smart Growth Areas Act of 1997 require municipalities to adopt County standards related to adequate public facilities; and WHEREAS, Chapter 165 of the Bel Air Town Code, the Development Regulation, Article II, Section 165-21 Annual Growth Report outlines the procedures for complying with the County Adequate Public Facilities requirements for schools; and WHEREAS, Chapter 165 of the Bel Air Town Code, requires submittal of the Harford County Growth Report to the Bel Air Board of Town Commissioners for acceptance at a public meeting; and WHEREAS, in June, 2020, the Harford County Department of Planning and Zoning submitted the Annual Growth Report attached hereto, indicating that the utilization rates of some public schools serving the Town of Bel Air exceed 110% of rated capacity; and WHEREAS, Homestead-Wakefield Elementary School (currently 112%), Red Pump Elementary School (113% in 2021), Bel Air Elementary School (113% in 2020) and Bel Air Middle School (currently 115%) are projected to be over capacity within the next three years. However, because all of these attendance areas abut schools that are identified as under capacity, no restrictions are mandated by code. All other school service areas will not be affected by adequacy standards established by the Town. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Bel Air Board of Town Commissioners that the 2019 Harford County Annual Growth Report attached hereto, shall be officially accepted and shall provide the basis for review and approval of residential development per Section 165-21 of the Town of Bel Air Development Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Oversize/Overweight Hauling Permit Manual
    Maryland Oversize/Overweight Hauling Permit Manual Maryland State Highway Administration Office of Traffic & Safety Motor Carrier Division Permit Manual as of April 10, 2008 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION TO HAULING PERMITS......................................................................................................................................4 HAULING PERMITS UNIT – LOCATION/MAILING ADDRESS..................................................................................................4 DIRECTIONS TO THE HAULING PERMITS UNIT........................................................................................................................6 GENERAL INFORMATION .................................................................................................................................................................7 COMPLETING THE HAULING PERMIT APPLICATION – IN GENERAL..............................................................................10 TYPES OF HAULING PERMITS AVAILABLE ..............................................................................................................................13 1. SPECIAL HAULING PERMIT – ......................................................................................................................................................13 SAMPLE APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL HAULING PERMIT ..............................................................................................14 2. BOOK PERMIT –..........................................................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation by WILMAPCO to New Castle County Civic League Elktonelkton Railrail Historyhistory
    Presentation by WILMAPCO to New Castle County Civic League ElktonElkton RailRail HistoryHistory 1837 - Wilmington & Susquehanna Railroad begins service to Elkton 1938 - 18 passenger trains a day stop at Elkton 1963 - Only 3 trains a day stop at the depot and all service would soon stop 1978-1981 – The Chesapeake (or Chessie), an Amtrak train, runs between Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., stopping in Elkton. 1981- today – No commuter rail exists between Newark and Perryville, MD Source: Historical Society of Cecil County ElktonElkton StationStation -- thenthen ElktonElkton StationStation -- NowNow RailRail FeasibilityFeasibility StudiesStudies TrackTrack AA PhasePhase 11 -- MarchMarch 20032003 ExtensionExtension ofof SEPTASEPTA fromfrom NewarkNewark toto ElktonElkton TrackTrack AA PhasePhase 22 -- -- OctoberOctober 20052005 ExtensionExtension ofof MARCMARC fromfrom PerryvillePerryville toto Elkton,Elkton, NewarkNewark oror WilmingtonWilmington PhasePhase 11:: Newark,Newark, DEDE toto Elkton,Elkton, MDMD Alternatives:Alternatives: Amtrak Regional service at Downtown Elkton Station - $4.1 million SEPTA service to Downtown Elkton – $20.6 million Pocket Track, two side platforms at Downtown Elkton to serve Tracks 1 and Pocket SEPTA service to I-95 - $44.5 million Extend Track A to Muddy Lane, truncate Track 1 to form Pocket Track, one center platform at I-95 for Tracks 1 and “A”, construct 400+ space parking lot, connect Track “0” at Otts Chapel Road, install interlocking between Tracks 1 and “A”, and relocate Newark Station
    [Show full text]
  • Application for Renewal of License 07-13441-02,Authorizing Use Of
    WhC W 318 U.S. NUCL444 Rt.UL;TORV COMIsim:0N 89$$75 > ASPROVGO wT OblS io Ce R a n. nue. :=ein m a an ATPLICATION FOR MATERIAL LICENSE- EN ema os6 - 2nh Wf ItetthuCTIOtt$i LEE THE APPROPRIATE LICENSE APPLICATION GUIDE FOR DETAILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING APPLICATION SEND TWO COPIES OF THE LNTIRE COMPLETED APPLICATION TO THE NRC OFFICE $PECIFIED BELOW. , A8PLICAft0ess F001 DtOTRISUTtOfu OF (ktMPT PRODUCTS FILE APPLICAtl0NS WITH. IF YOU ARE LOCATED IN; U.S WUCLEAR REGULAT00lv COMM*Stoe# eL Lise0:8. tNDI ANA lon A, MnCHIGAN, MINNtt0T A, Ml860Vfil. 0Hlo,0R (WVita0N OF f utL CYCLI AND WAf tR6AL $AFETY, edM&& WISCON&iN, StafO APPLICATIONS TO: , WASHsedGTON, DC 3Eme6 U S NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMIS$tDN. REGl0N ils ALL OTHER PER40se6 FILt APPLlCAft0ess As FOLLOWS,IF TOU Afit Matt RIALS LICENstNG StCTION LOCAftD 888 799 R00$tVELT ROAD 00essf8CTICUT. DSLAWARE. De8TRsCT OF COLUMelA. MAtest, MARYLAesD. 04AteACMuttTTS. sufW 14 AMP 9Hefit NfW JERSET. Ntw VORK, PtN989YLVANIA, AftK Ass &A$. COLOR ADO, lDAHO. R ANSAS, LOussiassa, ascertaesA, NteRasK A, flMODE teLAseO, OR YtRMOstT,98ND APPLICATtoast To: estW esE xiCD, es0RTH DAK07 A. OK LAHOMA, SOUTH DAKOT A, Tt RAS, UT AN, * U $ NUCLt AR RIOULATORY COMMITS 10N. Ilt010N I NUCLt AR MAftR8ALS GAFETV $tCTION D U $ NUCLE AM RIOULATORY COMM18810N Rt010N IV i' 476 LLLINDAtt ROAD W Af TRIAL RADI ATION PROTECTION SECTION i klNQ Of PRU$$44, PA 19401l 611 ftv AN PLAT A DRIVE, SUITE 1000 ' : ALA4 Atha. FLOfilDA. 940fl04A. ElstTUCKy. easteeshePPl. esOflTH CAROllesA. ! PusfrTO R4CO. SOU'M CAllOLINA. Yleesst Stit. YemetNIA, YsR06N ISLAesDS, OR At ASK A, ARl:0esA, CAtlFORNI A.
    [Show full text]
  • Harassment Claims Hard to Verify Computer Access to Dining Halls
    University of Delaware, Newark, Delawar~ Tuesday, October 12, 1976 Harassment Claims Hard to Verify Commission Pressures Administration for Grievance Procedure By TOM BIDGOOD spoke before the Faculty who has the same type of "It is very difficult" to Senate last week and alleged "authoritarian" relationship legally substantiate that "30 or 40 instances of with a superior. anonymous letters or phone sexual harassment" have He said these relationships calls that complain of sexual occurred between students can be between secretaries harassment, said Dr. John and faculty in the past year. and faculty or Worthen, vice president for Trabant disclosed these administrators, teaching ( student affairs and incidents as an example of assistants and faculty, and administration. the "authoritarian" junior faculty and senior Therefore, in those cases relationship existing between faculty. reported anonymously, students and faculty which When complaints of these "extensive documentation to he testified about at the trial incidents arose in the past determine the truth of such of former theatre director Worthen said he believed complaints is nearly Richard Aumiller. "that the administration has impossible," Worthen said. Saturday, Worthen dealt with them quietly, Worthen made these expanded the sexual effectively, and statements in response to harassment issue to include straightforwardly." questions generated when not only students and faculty, He said actions which may President E.A. Trabant but any university employee and have been taken when complaints of sexual harassment are brought UDCC Candidates Elected; against university staff, range from clearing the accused of charges to issuing Ten Per Cent Cast Ballots a reprimand, or if Ten per cent of the eligible undergraduate students voted in circumstances dictate, the .
    [Show full text]
  • ELKTON Transit‐Oriented Development Plan
    ELKTON Transit‐Oriented Development Plan Prepared for WILMAPCO & the TOWN OF ELKTON Prepared by DESIGN COLLECTIVE In collaboration with RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP January 2011 | WILMAPCO | WILMAPCO Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................... 5 Project Overview ...................................................................................... 5 Study Area ............................................................................................... 8 Previous Studies ..................................................................................... 10 Planning Process .................................................................................................. 11 Stakeholder Outreach ............................................................................ 11 Visioning Session .................................................................................... 12 Public Workshop ..................................................................................... 15 Surveys ................................................................................................... 16 Transportation Summary .................................................................................... 19 Zoning Regulations Summary .............................................................................. 23 Proposed Plan ...................................................................................................... 29 “Train to Main” ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]