DOCSLIB.ORG

Lincoln County Fire Defense Board and Northwest Management, Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lincoln County Fire Defense Board and Northwest Management, Inc Lincoln County, Oregon CCoommmmuunniittyy WWiillddffii rree PPrrootteeccttiioonn PPllaann AAAdddooopppttteeeddd bbbyyy ttthhheee LLLiiinnncccooolllnnn CCCooouuunnntttyyy BBBoooaaarrrddd ooofff CCCooommmmmmiiissssssiiiooonnneeerrrsss JJJuuunnneee 222000111000 South Stott Fire, Lincoln County, Oregon 2007 This plan was developed by the Lincoln County Community Wildfire Protection Plan committee in cooperation with the Lincoln County Fire Defense Board and Northwest Management, Inc. (Tel: 208-883-4488). Acknowledgments This Community Wildfire Protection Plan represents the efforts and cooperation of a number of organizations and agencies working together to improve preparedness for wildfire events while reducing factors of risk. Lincoln County Fire Defense Board To obtain copies of this plan contact: Jessica Bondy, Project Coordinator Phone: 541-265-4192 Lincoln County Department of Planning and Development 210 SW 2nd Street Newport, Oregon 97365 Table of Contents FOREWORD......................................................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1 .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 OVERVIEW OF THIS PLAN AND ITS DEVELOPMENT............................................................................ 2 GOALS AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES.................................................................................................................... 3 Planning Philosophy and Goals .............................................................................................................................. 3 United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) ...................................................................................... 4 State and Federal CWPP Guidelines....................................................................................................................... 5 INTEGRATION WITH OTHER LOCAL PLANNING DOCUMENTS........................................................................ 5 Lincoln County Multi-Jurisdictional Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan (2009) ......................................................5 Lincoln County Code – Timber Conservation Zone (2009) ................................................................................... 6 Oregon Department of Forestry – West Oregon District Mobilization Plan ..........................................................6 Forest Capital Partners Northwest Oregon Fire Plan (2009) .................................................................................. 6 Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians Fire Mobilization Plan (2009) .................................................................... 7 Oregon Forestland-Urban Interface Fire Protection Act of 1997............................................................................ 7 Lincoln County Forestland Classification............................................................................................................... 8 Oregon’s Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines............................................................................................... 8 Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians Emergency Operations Plan - 2007..........................................................10 Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2009.......................................................10 Lincoln County, Oregon Emergency Operations Plan - 2008 .............................................................................. 11 CHAPTER 2 ........................................................................................................................................................ 12 DOCUMENTING THE PLANNING PROCESS ............................................................................................ 12 DESCRIPTION OF THE PLANNING PROCESS.................................................................................................... 12 THE PLANNING TEAM...................................................................................................................................... 12 Multi-Jurisdictional Participation ......................................................................................................................... 13 PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETINGS ............................................................................................................... 14 Committee Meeting Minutes ................................................................................................................................ 14 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT.................................................................................................................................... 14 News Releases ...................................................................................................................................................... 15 Public Meetings .................................................................................................................................................... 15 Documented Review Process................................................................................................................................ 18 Continued Public Involvement.............................................................................................................................. 18 CHAPTER 3 ........................................................................................................................................................ 20 LINCOLN COUNTY CHARACTERISTICS..................................................................................................20 GEOGRAPHY AND CLIMATE ............................................................................................................................ 20 POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHICS ................................................................................................................ 21 Employment and Economics ................................................................................................................................ 21 Land Ownership and Development....................................................................................................................... 22 NATURAL RESOURCES..................................................................................................................................... 22 Hydrology ............................................................................................................................................................. 23 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................................................ 24 Oregon State Smoke Management Plan................................................................................................................ 25 CHAPTER 4 ........................................................................................................................................................ 26 RISK AND PREPAREDNESS ASSESSMENTS ............................................................................................. 26 WILDLAND FIRE CHARACTERISTICS.............................................................................................................. 26 Weather................................................................................................................................................................. 26 Topography........................................................................................................................................................... 26 Fuels...................................................................................................................................................................... 27 WILDFIRE HAZARDS........................................................................................................................................ 27 History of Major Fires .......................................................................................................................................... 27 Wildfire Ignition Profile ....................................................................................................................................... 30 Wildfire Extent Profile.......................................................................................................................................... 32 WILDFIRE HAZARD ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................... 37 Historic Fire Regime............................................................................................................................................. 37 Fire Regime Condition Class ................................................................................................................................ 38 LINCOLN COUNTY’S WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE................................................................................... 39 Potential WUI Treatments .................................................................................................................................... 44 LINCOLN COUNTY CONDITIONS ..................................................................................................................... 44 Overall
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Landscape Patterns of Burn Severity in the Soberanes Fire of 2016 Christopher Potter* NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA
    hy & rap Na g tu o r e a Potter, J Geogr Nat Disast 2016, S6 l G f D o i s l a Journal of DOI: 10.4172/2167-0587.S6-005 a s n t r e u r s o J ISSN: 2167-0587 Geography & Natural Disasters ResearchResearch Article Article OpenOpen Access Access Landscape Patterns of Burn Severity in the Soberanes Fire of 2016 Christopher Potter* NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA Abstract The Soberanes Fire started on July 22, 2016 in Monterey County on the California Central Coast from an illegal campfire. This disastrous fire burned for 10 weeks at a record cost of more than $208 million for protection and control. A progressive analysis of the normalized burn ratio from the Landsat satellite showed that the final high burn severity (HBS) area for the Soberanes Fire comprised 22% of the total area burned, whereas final moderate burn severity (MBS) area comprised about 10% of the total area burned of approximately 53,470 ha (132,130 acres). The resulting landscape pattern of burn severity classes from the 2016 Soberanes Fire revealed that the majority of HBS area was located in the elevation zone between 500 and 1000 m, in the slope zone between 15% and 30%, or on south-facing aspects. The total edge length of HBS areas nearly doubled over the course of the event, indicating a gradually increasing landscape complexity pattern for this fire. The perimeter-to-area ratio for HBS patches decreased by just 3% over the course of the fire, while the HBS clumpiness metric remained nearly constant at a relatively high aggregation value.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Modeling of Extreme Wildland Fire Events
    Computational modeling of extreme wildland fire events: a synthesis of scientific understanding with applications to forecasting, land management, and firefighter safety Janice L. Coena,b W. Schroederc S Conwayd L Tarnaye a National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado b Corresponding author. [email protected] c NOAA/NESDIS/OSPO/SPSD, College Park, MD d Conway Conservation Group, Incline Village, NV e USDA Forest Service, Region 5 Remote Sensing Laboratory, McClellan, CA ACCEPTED Journal of Computational Science Formal publication location: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2020.101152 1 Abstract The understanding and prediction of large wildland fire events around the world is a growing interdisciplinary research area advanced rapidly by development and use of computational models. Recent models bidirectionally couple computational fluid dynamics models including weather prediction models with modules containing algorithms representing fire spread and heat release, simulating fire-atmosphere interactions across scales spanning three orders of magnitude. Integrated with weather data and airborne and satellite remote sensing data on wildland fuels and active fire detection, modern coupled weather-fire modeling systems are being used to solve current science problems. Compared to legacy tools, these dynamic computational modeling systems increase cost and complexity but have produced breakthrough insights notably into the mechanisms underlying extreme wildfire events such as fine-scale extreme winds associated with interruptions of the electricity grid and have been configured to forecast a fire's growth, expanding our ability to anticipate how they will unfold. We synthesize case studies of recent extreme events, expanding applications, and the challenges and limitations in our remote sensing systems, fire prediction tools, and meteorological models that add to wildfires' mystery and apparent unpredictability.
    [Show full text]
  • Karuk and Yurok Prescribed Cultural Fire Revitalization In
    KARUK AND YUROK PRESCRIBED CULTURAL FIRE REVITALIZATION IN CALIFORNIA’S KLAMATH BASIN: SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL DYNAMICS AND POLITICAL ECOLOGY OF INDIGENOUS BURNING AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY TONY MARKS-BLOCK JUNE 2020 © 2020 by Tony Alex Marks-Block. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/cg226hq3123 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Lisa Curran, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Paulla Ebron I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Michael Wilcox Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Stacey F. Bent, Vice Provost for Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary: Basin/Indians Fire Complex BAER Initial Assessment
    Redacted Version 9/5/08 Executive Summary: Basin/Indians Fire Complex BAER Initial Assessment NOTE: Cost and related information for different treatment tasks have been removed (redacted) from this version of the BAER Executive Summary and Report to ensure that no advantage is given to vendors who may be bidding on the various work items. The Basin Fire/Indians Fire Complex combined and burned approximately 240,000 acres of federal, state and private lands. Of that, nearly 198,000 acres or 83 percent are National Forest System lands on the Monterey District of Los Padres National Forest (LPNF). Of the LPNF land burned, 93 percent is within the congressionally designated Ventana Wilderness. The remaining 42,000 acres, or 17 percent of the burn, are private, state, military (Army), Bureau of Land Management, and Monterey County land. The Indians Fire started on June 8, and was contained on July 10, at an estimated cost of $42.5 million. The Basin Complex Fire started on June 21, merged with the Indians Fire, and was contained on July 27, at an estimated cost of $77.2 million. While the fires were still burning, Forest Service BAER Coordinators at the Regional and Forest level communicated regularly via email and phone with the State Office of Emergency Services and CAL FIRE representatives to request and help facilitate the mobilization of the State Emergency Assessment Team (SEAT) to work in concert with the Basin Complex/Indians BAER Team during the assessment effort. The U.S. Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Center in Salt Lake City provided BARC (Burned Area Reflectance Classification) digital coverage for the entire fire area including private and state managed lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid-Response Fire Behavior Research and Real-Time Monitoring, P. 23
    Fire Managementtoday Volume 65 • No. 3 • Summer 2005 PERSPECTIVES ON WILDLAND FIRE United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Fire Management Today is published by the Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. The Secretary of Agriculture has determined that the publication of this periodical is necessary in the transaction of the public business required by law of this Department. Fire Management Today is for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, at: Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: 202-512-1800 Fax: 202-512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 Fire Management Today is available on the World Wide Web at <http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/fmt/index.html Mike Johanns, Secretary Melissa Frey U.S. Department of Agriculture General Manager Dale Bosworth, Chief Robert H. “Hutch” Brown, Ph.D. Forest Service Managing Editor Tom Harbour, Director Madelyn Dillon Fire and Aviation Management Editor The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communi- cation of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Accident Prevention Analysis Report Indians Fire Los Padres National Forest June 11, 2008
    Accident Prevention Analysis Report Indians Fire Los Padres National Forest June 11, 2008 Pacific Southwest Region July 24, 2008 Amended February 12, 2009 to include author’s names in Appendix E This document contains materials for internal agency use only. These materials are not releasable under the Freedom of Information Act. Indians Fire Accident Prevention Analysis Report 1 Contents Executive Summary……………………………………………………. 3 I Introduction…………………………………..………………………………… 6 II Review Objectives……………………………………………………...……. 8 III Methodology……………………….…………………………………………. 9 IV The Story……………………………………………………………………… 10 V Lessons Learned by Firefighters ……………..…………………………. 36 VI Lessons Learned Analysis…………………..……………………………. 39 VII Recommendations…………………………….…………………………… 49 VIII Summary……………………….……………………………………………. 52 IX Commendation……………………...……………………………………….. 54 X Appendices……………………...……………………………………………. 55 Appendix A – Chronology of Events………………………………... 55 Appendix B – Equipment Report………………………………….…. 64 Appendix C – Fire Behavior Report…………………………………. 68 Appendix D – Meteorology Report………………………………….. 88 Appendix E – Human Factors Analysis…………………………….. 98 Appendix F – Accident Prevention Analysis Team Members….. 114 Indians Fire Accident Prevention Analysis Report 2 Executive Summary The Indians Fire reportedly started Sunday June 08, 2008 at around 12:35 pm in the Arroyo Seco drainage near the Escondido campground on the Los Padres National Forest (LPF) (Figure1). The fire began under foehn wind conditions that pushed the fire southeasterly, down slope, down canyon, and continued to do so for the next 4 days with the burned area generally doubling each day. Figure 1. Vicinity map of Indians Fire. The area had been experiencing recent warm and dry conditions and was in a long term drought. All time record low precipitation amounts in the previous three months resulted in extremely low dead fuel moisture levels. On the morning of Tuesday, June 10 th, li ttle smoke was visible and the fire was fairly quiet.
    [Show full text]
  • Link to the Full Fire Management Today Issue
    Fire Managementtoday Volume 65 • No. 3 • Summer 2005 PERSPECTIVES ON WILDLAND FIRE United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Fire Management Today is published by the Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. The Secretary of Agriculture has determined that the publication of this periodical is necessary in the transaction of the public business required by law of this Department. Fire Management Today is for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, at: Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: 202-512-1800 Fax: 202-512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 Fire Management Today is available on the World Wide Web at <http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/fmt/index.html Mike Johanns, Secretary Melissa Frey U.S. Department of Agriculture General Manager Dale Bosworth, Chief Robert H. “Hutch” Brown, Ph.D. Forest Service Managing Editor Tom Harbour, Director Madelyn Dillon Fire and Aviation Management Editor The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communi­ cation of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720­ 2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • A Test of Adversity and Strength: Wildland Fire in the National Park System
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Wildland Fire Program A Test of Adversity and Strength Wildland Fire in the National Park System By Hal K. Rothman NPS/J HENRY A Test of Adversity and Strength: Wildland Fire in the National Park System By Hal K. Rothman, Principal Investigator National Park Service Cooperative Agreement Order #CA 8034-2-9003 Special Consultant: Stephen J. Pyne Research Associates: Lincoln Bramwell, Brenna Lissoway, and Lesley Argo Project Managers David Sproul, Michael Childers, and Daniel Holder i Fire is the test of gold; adversity, of strong men. Seneca, Epistles ii Executive Summary The National Park Service’s mission, unique among federal agencies, has made its history of fire policy diverge from that of its peers. Federal fire protection began in the national parks in 1886, when the U.S. Army assumed administration of Yellowstone National Park. After the trauma of the 1910 fire season and creation of a civilian National Park Service in 1916, the new Service embraced the U.S. Forest Service’s policy of aggressive fire suppression. For almost fifty years, suppression was policy, a reality that only began to change in the 1950s. The Leopold Report, published in 1963, further articulated differences in the National Park Service’s mission with its call for parks to be managed as “vignettes of primitive America.” Following passage of the Wilderness Act in 1964, federal agencies – including the NPS – were compelled to reassess their management plans in the context of the new law. Steadily, each federal agency found its mission redefined and its goals recast; this translated into a more diverse spectrum of fire practices, at once splintering the former unity of purpose that surrounded suppression while demanding new ideas and devices to reintegrate those fragmented parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Dolan Fire BAER Report
    USDA FOREST SERVICE FS-2500-8 (2/20) Date of Report: 10/13/2020 DOLAN FIRE BURNED-AREA REPORT Los Padres National Forest Monterey Ranger District October 13, 2020 The US Forest Service Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER) team assesses the threats to life, property, cultural and natural resources from post-fire changes to the watershed that can cause erosion, sedimentation, rockfall, flooding, and debris flows. BAER members analyzed the entire Dolan Fire footprint for changes in watershed response and shared their data through Monterey County Offices of Emergency Services (OES) website with all entities affected by the fire. This report is a brief synopsis of BAER findings and the Forest Service’s internal request for implementation funding to treat values at risk on Forest Service lands only. It includes a summary of the technical reports generated by the BAER team and potential pre-rain mitigations for values managed by the Forest Service. Complete technical reports and maps are available through the OES. Information generated by the BAER team is crucial for further analysis by other agencies affected by the fire to examine their values at risk occurring off-Forest. Pre-rain mitigation treatments on non-Forest lands are the responsibility of the managers/owners of those values. The Forest Service will cooperate with other agencies to implement treatments if they must occur on lands managed by the Forest Service, and will continue to coordinate with OES to provide technical support and information. 1 | Page USDA FOREST SERVICE FS-2500-8 (2/20) PART I - TYPE OF REQUEST A. Type of Report ☒ 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Wildfire on the Sediment Yield of a Coastal California Watershed
    The effects of wildfi re on the sediment yield of a coastal California watershed J.A. Warrick1,†, J.A. Hatten2, G.B. Pasternack3, A.B. Gray3, M.A. Goni4, and R.A. Wheatcroft4 1U.S. Geological Survey, Pacifi c Coastal and Marine Science Center, Santa Cruz, California 95060, USA 2College of Forest Resources, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762, USA 3Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA 4College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA ABSTRACT approach of estimating sediment yield from sediment discharge and sedimentation in sediment rating curves and discharge data— downstream channels, reservoirs, and coastal The occurrence of two wildfi res separated without including periodic perturbations landforms, which can alter landform morphol- by 31 yr in the chaparral-dominated Arroyo from wildfi res—may grossly underestimate ogy and aquatic habitats (e.g., Florsheim et al., Seco watershed (293 km2) of California pro- actual sediment yields. 1991; Reneau et al., 2007; Malmon et al., 2007; vides a unique opportunity to evaluate the Warrick et al., 2008). Postfi re erosion also re- effects of wildfi re on suspended-sediment INTRODUCTION sults in increased export of carbon and nutrients yield. Here, we compile discharge and sus- from burned watersheds, which can infl uence pended-sediment sampling data from before Wildfi re alters the physical conditions of veg- rates of primary production and carbon preser- and after the fi res and show that the effects of etation and soil, and these changes can modify vation in depositional settings (Johnson et al., the postfi re responses differed markedly.
    [Show full text]
  • Visitor Waiver
    SAN FRANCISCO ZEN CENTER WAIVER OF LIABILITY, ASSUMPTION OF RISK 1. Voluntary Participation I, ________________________, [Participant’s name] am voluntarily visiting the San Francisco Zen Center’s Tassajara Zen Mountain Center, Carmel Valley, California (“Tassajara”). 2. Inherent Risks Tassajara is located at the bottom of a gorge area, with steep rock walls that overlook the Zen Mountain Center. At all times, both in the immediate area of Tassajara and in the surrounding area, there is a high risk from land falls, falling rocks and boulders and, after rainfall, there is a potential of flooding and injury associated with flooding. In addition, because only one road provides access to and from Tassajara, at any time this road could be blocked, thereby limiting evacuation, access to healthcare and other regular and emergency services. 3. Risks from Fires and Rock Falls Over at least the last thirteen years, fires have occurred in Monterey County. The “Basin-Indians Fire” in 2008 and the Soberanes fire in 2016, burned many thousands of acres in Monterey County including the upper Carmel River, Arroyo Seco, San Antonio, Rat Creek, Big Sur and Little Sur watersheds and other parts of the Los Padres National Forest in which Tassajara is located. The most recent fires in the general vicinity of Tassajara were the “Carmel Fire” and the “Dolan Fire” in 2020. Risks from future fires remain. The site of Tassajara is located at the bottom of an active inner gorge area, with steep (nearly vertical) highly fractured rock walls, rock fall, dry ravel and deposits from previous debris flows exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Orleans/Somes Bar Community Wildfire Protection Plan
    OOrrlleeaannss//SSoommeess BBaarr CCoommmmuunniittyy WWiillddffiirree PPrrootteeccttiioonn PPllaann A Collaborative Fire Protection Strategy for the Communities of Orleans and Somes Bar Coordinated by the Orleans/Somes Bar Fire Safe Council Orleans, California January 2012 Acknowledgements Thank you to Cybelle Immitt, Lucy Salazar, Bill Tripp, Mark Rodgers, Hugh Scanlon, Tracy Katelman, Jim Villeponteaux, Max Creasy, Ben Riggan, Frank Lake, Penny Eckert, Todd Salberg, Roberta Coragliotti, Tom Bouse, Chris Root, Nancy Bailey, Will Harling, and Luna Latimer Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the USDA Forest Service through the California Fire Safe Council and The County of Humboldt Orleans/Somes Bar Community Wildfire Protection Plan 1. OBJECTIVES OF A COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN: ..................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION: .....................................................................................................................................................................................1 ABOUT THE OSB FSC............................................................................................................................................................................3 DECISIONMAKERS..................................................................................................................................................................................4 FEDERAL AND TRIBAL AGENCIES ..........................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]