DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record—House H5963

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congressional Record—House H5963 June 5, 2007 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H5963 While it can do much more, China has The text of the resolution is as fol- ance, and urban planning projects that were taken some steps to alleviate the suffering in lows: undertaken openly and with the knowledge of the Iranian Government; Darfur. Last November, China helped nego- H. RES. 430 Whereas on May 31, 2007, a State Depart- tiate the agreement at Addis Abba which Whereas Haleh Esfandiari, Ph.D., holds ment spokesman announced that California called for the deployment of a joint United Na- dual citizenship in the United States and businessman Ali Shakeri, who holds dual tions/African Union peacekeeping force. In Iran; citizenship in the United States and Iran, May, China appointed a Special Envoy to Whereas Dr. Esfandiari taught Persian lan- had been arrested approximately ten days guage and literature for many years at Sudan and pledged $5.1 million in humani- earlier; Princeton University, where she inspired un- Whereas Mr. Shakeri serves on the board of tarian aid to Darfur. Yet these positive steps told numbers of students to study the rich University of California at Irvine’s Center are far outweighed by China’s continuing sup- Persian language and culture; for Citizen Peacebuilding, a research institu- port for the genocidal regime in Khartoum. Whereas Dr. Esfandiari is a resident of the tion that seeks to promote reconciliation Unless China acts to pressure the Khartoum State of Maryland and the Director of the and sustainable peace in areas of inter- Middle East Program at the Woodrow Wilson government into accepting a U.N. peace- national conflict; International Center for Scholars in Wash- keeping force, China risks having the 2008 Whereas Mr. Shakeri’s arrest occurred as ington, D.C. (referred to in this preamble as Beijing Olympics forever known as the geno- he sought to leave the country after having the ‘‘Wilson Center’’); cide Olympics. China must condemn the vio- Whereas, for the past decade, Dr. visited his ill mother, who passed away dur- lence taking place in Darfur, halt all military Esfandiari has traveled to Iran twice a year ing his stay; arms sales to Sudan, and suspend economic to visit her ailing now-93-year-old mother; Whereas reports indicate that a fifth dual ties to Sudan until the Government of Sudan Whereas, in December 2006, on her return American-Iranian citizen, who has thus far stops attacking civilians, complies with U.N. to the airport during her last visit to Iran, remained anonymous, has also been impris- oned unjustly by Iranian authorities; Security Council resolutions, and enters into Dr. Esfandiari was robbed by three masked, knife-wielding men, who stole her travel doc- Whereas the Iranian Government has yet peace negotiations with rebel groups. to produce evidence of wrongdoing by any of As China rises as a power in the 21st cen- uments, luggage, and other effects; Whereas, when Dr. Esfandiari attempted to these individuals to justify its actions to- tury, it must realize that with its increased obtain replacement travel documents in ward them; and power comes a greater responsibility to take Iran, she was summoned to an interview by Whereas Dr. Esfandiari, Ms. Azima, and action to stop genocide. Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence; Mr. Tajbakhsh have been charged with espio- Mr. RUSH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to Whereas Dr. Esfandiari was interrogated nage and, if convicted, face execution: Now, voice my support for H. Res. 422, which calls by the Ministry of Intelligence for seven to therefore, be it eight hours per day; Resolved, That Iran should immediately on the Government of the People’s Republic and unconditionally release dual Iranian- of China to use its unique influence and eco- Whereas the questioning by the Ministry of Intelligence focused on the Middle East Pro- American citizens Dr. Haleh Esfandiari, Ms. nomic leverage to stop the genocide and vio- gram at the Wilson Center; Parnaz Azima, Mr. Kian Tajbakhsh, Mr. Ali lence in Darfur. Whereas Dr. Esfandiari answered all ques- Shakeri, and a fifth unnamed individual also The world must be united in its call for an tions to the best of her ability, and the Wil- being detained against his will, replace their end to genocide. As China seeks to enter onto son Center also provided extensive informa- lost travel documents, cease its tactics of the world stage as a global economic and dip- tion to the Ministry in a good faith effort to harassment, and permit them to leave Iran. lomatic power, the government must assume aid Dr. Esfandiari; Amend the title so as to read: A resolu- Whereas Lee Hamilton, former United tion ‘‘calling for Iran to immediately release the responsibility, as well as the benefits that five dual Iranian-American citizens cur- accompany this distinction. States Representative and president of the Wilson Center, has written to Iranian leader rently being held unjustly.’’. China must use its close economic and mili- Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to call his attention The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- tary ties and advise the Sudanese government to Dr. Esfandiari’s dire situation; ant to the rule, the gentleman from that genocide is very bad for business. Con- Whereas Mr. Hamilton repeated that the Tennessee (Mr. TANNER) and the gen- gress and the world are watching. It is impera- Wilson Center’s mission is to provide forums tlewoman from Florida (Ms. ROS- tive that China uses its power in a responsible to exchange views and opinions and not to LEHTINEN) each will control 20 minutes. manner and help bring a change to this trou- take positions on issues, nor try to influence The Chair recognizes the gentleman bled region. specific outcomes; from Tennessee. Mr. TANNER. Mr. Speaker, I yield Whereas the lengthy interrogations of Dr. back the balance of my time. Esfandiari by the Ministry of Intelligence of GENERAL LEAVE Iran stopped on February 14, 2007, but she The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Mr. TANNER. Mr. Speaker, I ask heard nothing for ten weeks and was denied unanimous consent that all Members question is on the motion offered by her passport; the gentleman from Tennessee (Mr. Whereas, on May 7, 2007, Dr. Esfandiari was may have 5 legislative days to revise TANNER) that the House suspend the summoned to the Ministry of Intelligence and extend their remarks and include rules and agree to the resolution, H. and taken immediately to Evin prison, where extraneous material on the resolution Res. 422. she was arrested and is currently being held; under consideration. The question was taken. Whereas Iran’s Intelligence Ministry has The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there The SPEAKER pro tempore. In the implicated Dr. Esfandiari and the Wilson objection to the request of the gen- opinion of the Chair, two-thirds being Center in advancing what it alleges is the tleman from Tennessee? United States Government’s aim of a ‘‘soft in the affirmative, the ayes have it. There was no objection. revolution’’ in Iran; Mr. TANNER. Mr. Speaker, I rise in Mr. TANNER. Mr. Speaker, on that I Whereas Parnaz Azima holds dual citizen- demand the yeas and nays. ship in the United States and Iran; support of this resolution and yield The yeas and nays were ordered. Whereas Ms. Azima is a journalist for myself as much time as I may con- The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- Radio Farda; sume. ant to clause 8 of rule XX and the Whereas the Iranian Government con- Mr. Speaker, just a few short months Chair’s prior announcement, further fiscated the passport of Ms. Azima when she ago, a remarkably accomplished Ira- proceedings on this question will be arrived in Iran to visit her ill mother in Jan- nian American woman, Dr. Haleh uary of 2007; postponed. Esfandiari, made a decision that any of Whereas the Iranian authorities have in- us would make under a similar cir- f terrogated Ms. Azima on multiple occasions; cumstance. Her 93-year-old mother was CALLING ON THE GOVERNMENT Whereas Ms. Azima’s attorney was told in April 2007 that she would be detained in Iran failing and she needed to visit her in OF IRAN TO RELEASE DR. for at least two years or more; Tehran without delay. She boarded a HALEH ESFANDIARI Whereas social scientist Kian Tajbakhsh flight to Iran, completely unsuspecting Mr. TANNER. Mr. Speaker, I move to was arrested in mid-May by Iranian security of what would unfold. suspend the rules and agree to the reso- officials while consulting for the Open Soci- After a visit with her ailing mother, lution (H. Res. 430) calling on the Gov- ety Institute, which runs humanitarian pro- Dr. Esfandiari reached the Tehran air- ernment of the Islamic Republic of grams in Iran; port. As one of the leading Middle East Whereas Mr. Tajbakhsh holds dual citizen- Iran to immediately release Dr. Haleh ship in the United States and Iran; scholars in the United States at the Esfandiari, as amended. Whereas Mr. Tajbakhsh was retained by highly respected Woodrow Wilson Insti- The Clerk read the title of the resolu- the Open Society Institute as a consultant to tute, she had no reason to believe she tion. facilitate public health, humanitarian assist- was about to encounter trouble. But on VerDate Aug 31 2005 06:18 Jul 28, 2007 Jkt 059060 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 J:\CRONLINE\2007BA~3\2007NE~2\H05JN7.REC H05JN7 mmaher on PROD1PC70 with CONG-REC-ONLINE H5964 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE June 5, 2007 her way to the airport, she was at- Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of Mr. VAN HOLLEN. Mr. Speaker, I tacked by plain-clothed, knife-wielding my time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A/HRC/13/39/Add.1 General Assembly
    United Nations A/HRC/13/39/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 February 2010 English/French/Spanish only Human Rights Council Thirteenth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Report of the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Manfred Nowak Addendum Summary of information, including individual cases, transmitted to Governments and replies received* * The present document is being circulated in the languages of submission only as it greatly exceeds the page limitations currently imposed by the relevant General Assembly resolutions. GE.10-11514 A/HRC/13/39/Add.1 Contents Paragraphs Page List of abbreviations......................................................................................................................... 5 I. Introduction............................................................................................................. 1–5 6 II. Summary of allegations transmitted and replies received....................................... 1–305 7 Algeria ............................................................................................................ 1 7 Angola ............................................................................................................ 2 7 Argentina ........................................................................................................ 3 8 Australia.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Statement on the American Citizens Held in Iran June 1, 2007
    June 1 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2007 And so I want to thank you all for joining and finger-pointing. And we’ll spend energy on a really important piece of legislation. and time and effort to help you advance It’s the right thing to do. It’s the right a really important piece of legislation for approach to take. It is right to address a the good of this country. problem. It is right to work with people I’ve come by to say thanks. Chertoff and in both political parties. It is right to argue Gutierrez can tell you how the bill has got- for what you believe and recognize that ten this far and what we see in the future. compromise might be necessary to move But I’m looking forward to signing a bill, the bill along. And it is right to take polit- and I think we will. I truly believe that ical risk for Members of the United States when people with good will and good heart Congress. and with focus on helping this country I say—I don’t think this is risky, frankly. come together, that we can get a good I don’t view this as risk reward. I frankly piece of legislation out. And I’m looking view it as doing what you ought to do. forward to signing it. I hope you’ll be there See, people ought to be running for office when I do. to do what’s right for the United States God bless.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy
    Iran, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs August 14, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32048 Iran, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy Summary Since the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979, a priority of U.S. policy has been to reduce the perceived threat posed by Iran to a broad range of U.S. interests, including the security of the Persian Gulf region. In 2014, a common adversary emerged in the form of the Islamic State organization, reducing gaps in U.S. and Iranian regional interests, although the two countries have often differing approaches over how to try to defeat the group. The finalization on July 14, 2015, of a “Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action” (JCPOA) between Iran and six negotiating powers could enhance Iran’s ability to counter the United States and its allies in the region, but could also pave the way for cooperation to resolve some of the region’s several conflicts. During the 1980s and 1990s, U.S. officials identified Iran’s support for militant Middle East groups as a significant threat to U.S. interests and allies. A perceived potential threat from Iran’s nuclear program emerged in 2002, and the United States orchestrated broad international economic pressure on Iran to try to ensure that the program is verifiably confined to purely peaceful purposes. The international pressure contributed to the June 2013 election as president of Iran of the relatively moderate Hassan Rouhani, who campaigned as an advocate of ending Iran’s international isolation.
    [Show full text]
  • A New World War for a New World Order
    A New World War for a New World Order The Origins of World War III: Part 3 By Andrew Gavin Marshall Region: Middle East & North Africa, Russia Global Research, December 17, 2009 and FSU, sub-Saharan Africa 17 December 2009 Theme: US NATO War Agenda This article is Part 3 in the Series, “The Origins of World War III.” Part 1: An Imperial Strategy for a New World Order: The Origins of World War III Part 2: Colour-Coded Revolutions and the Origins of World War III Introduction In Parts 1 and 2 of this series, I have analyzed US and NATO geopolitical strategy since the fall of the Soviet Union, in expanding the American empire and preventing the rise of new powers, containing Russia and China. This Part examines the implications of this strategy in recent years; following the emergence of a New Cold War, as well as analyzing the war in Georgia, the attempts and methods of regime change in Iran, the coup in Honduras, the expansion of the Afghan-Pakistan war theatre, and spread of conflict in Central Africa. These processes of a New Cold War and major regional wars and conflicts take the world closer to a New World War. Peace is only be possible if the tools and engines of empires are dismantled. Eastern Europe: Forefront of the New Cold War In 2002, the Guardian reported that, “The US military build-up in the former Soviet republics of central Asia is raising fears in Moscow that Washington is exploiting the Afghan war to establish a permanent, armed foothold in the region.” Further, “The swift construction of US military bases is also likely to ring alarm bells in Beijing.”[1] In 2004, it was reported that US strategy “is to position U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Journalists and Screenwriters
    PEN INTERNATIONAL Writers in Prison Committee Case List – January to June 2012 PEN INTERNATIONAL Writers in Prison Committee Half-yearly CASELIST To 30 June 2012 PEN International Writers in Prison Committee 50/51 High Holborn London WC1V 6ER United Kingdom Tel: + 44 020 74050338 Fax: + 44 020 74050339 e-mail: [email protected] web site: www.pen-international.org.uk PEN INTERNATIONAL Writers in Prison Committee PEN International is the leading voice of literature worldwide, bringing together poets, novelists, essayists, historians, critics, translators, editors, journalists and screenwriters. Its members are united in a common concern for the craft and art of writing and a commitment to freedom of expression through the written word. Through its Centres, PEN operates on all five continents with 144 centres in 102 countries. Founded in London in 1921, PEN connects an international community of writers. It is a forum where writers meet freely to discuss their work. It is also a voice speaking out for writers silenced in their own countries. The Writers in Prison Committee of Pen International was set up in 1960 as a result of mounting concern about attempts to silence critical voices around the world through the detention of writers. It works on behalf of all those who are detained or otherwise persecuted for their opinions expressed in writing and for writers who are under attack for their peaceful political activities or for the practice of their profession, provided that they did not use violence or advocate violence or racial hatred. Member centres of PEN International are active in campaigning for an improvement in the conditions of persecuted writers and journalists.
    [Show full text]
  • Syllabus (Silvia Borzutzky
    International Politics and Policies Professor: Silvia Borzutzky Email: [email protected] Office: 2112 Hamburg Hall Office Hours: Please email me for a zoom appointment. Tas: Maxwell Hill ([email protected]) Bianca Lopez (bslopezandrew.cmu.edu) Sam Blurton ([email protected]) You can email your TA and request a zoom appointment. Course Objectives The goal of this course is to examine critical international policies, issues, and actors. The different sections of the course will discuss: 1.-U.S. Foreign Policy: Current policies including our relationship with Iran, Pakistan, India, Russia and selected African and Latin American countries will be discussed throughout the course. 2.-The section on China will provide a detailed analysis of China’s economic and military transformation into a major international power in the last thirty years. This section will focus on China’s economic and defense policies, China’s relations with countries across the globe, and China’s role in the world economy. 3.-China-U.S. Relations will receive special attention. Among the topics discussed will be power competition in the S. China Sea and in South and East Asia, as well as China- U.S. economic relations. 4.-The section on Russia will include a brief background and a discussion of Russia’s current role in the international economic and political system. 6.-Latin America and Africa’s interactions with both China and the U.S. will be discussed in the last section What do you get from this course? a) Knowledge At the end of the course, the students are expected to have: a) Learned the main analytic methods and approaches used in international relations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iranian Revolution at 30
    Viewpoints Special Edition The Iranian Revolution at 30 The Middle East Institute Washington, DC Middle East Institute The mission of the Middle East Institute is to promote knowledge of the Middle East in Amer- ica and strengthen understanding of the United States by the people and governments of the region. For more than 60 years, MEI has dealt with the momentous events in the Middle East — from the birth of the state of Israel to the invasion of Iraq. Today, MEI is a foremost authority on contemporary Middle East issues. It pro- vides a vital forum for honest and open debate that attracts politicians, scholars, government officials, and policy experts from the US, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. MEI enjoys wide access to political and business leaders in countries throughout the region. Along with information exchanges, facilities for research, objective analysis, and thoughtful commentary, MEI’s programs and publications help counter simplistic notions about the Middle East and America. We are at the forefront of private sector public diplomacy. Viewpoints are another MEI service to audiences interested in learning more about the complexities of issues affecting the Middle East and US rela- tions with the region. To learn more about the Middle East Institute, visit our website at http://www.mideasti.org Cover photos, clockwise from the top left hand corner: Shahram Sharif photo; sajed.ir photo; sajed.ir photo; ? redo photo; sajed. ir photo; Maryam Ashoori photo; Zongo69 photo; UN photo; and [ john ] photo. 2 The Middle East Institute Viewpoints: The Iranian Revolution at 30 • www.mideasti.org Viewpoints Special Edition The Iranian Revolution at 30 The Middle East Institute Viewpoints: The Iranian Revolution at 30 • www.mideasti.org 3 Viewpoints: 1979 The year 1979 was among the most tumultuous, and important, in the history of the modern Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Public Diplomacy Towards Iran During the George W
    U.S. PUBLIC DIPLOMACY TOWARDS IRAN DURING THE GEORGE W. BUSH ERA A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of PhD to the Department of History and Cultural Studies of the Freie Universität Berlin by Javad Asgharirad Date of the viva voce/defense: 05.01.2012 First examiner: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Ursula Lehmkuhl Second examiner: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Nicholas J. Cull i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My greatest thanks go to Prof. Ursula Lehmkuhl whose supervision and guidance made it possible for me to finish the current work. She deserves credit for any virtues the work may possess. Special thanks go to Nicholas Cull who kindly invited me to spend a semester at the University of Southern California where I could conduct valuable research and develop academic linkages with endless benefits. I would like to extend my gratitude to my examination committee, Prof. Dr. Claus Schönig, Prof. Dr. Paul Nolte, and Dr. Christoph Kalter for taking their time to read and evaluate my dissertation here. In the process of writing and re-writing various drafts of the dissertation, my dear friends and colleagues, Marlen Lux, Elisabeth Damböck, and Azadeh Ghahghaei took the burden of reading, correcting, and commenting on the rough manuscript. I deeply appreciate their support. And finally, I want to extend my gratitude to Pier C. Pahlavi, Hessamodin Ashena, and Foad Izadi, for sharing with me the results of some of their academic works which expanded my comprehension of the topic. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS II LIST OF TABLES, FIGURES AND IMAGES V LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS VI ABSTRACT VII INTRODUCTION 1 STATEMENT OF THE TOPIC 2 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY AND QUESTIONS 2 LITERATURE SURVEY 4 UNDERSTANDING PUBLIC DIPLOMACY:DEFINING THE TERM 5 Public Diplomacy Instruments 8 America’s Public Diplomacy 11 CHAPTER OUTLINE 14 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran: Internal Politics and U.S
    Iran: Internal Politics and U.S. Policy and Options Updated March 6, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL32048 Iran: Internal Politics and U.S. Policy and Options Summary Ever since the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran, the United States and Iran have been at odds, although to varying degrees of intensity. During the 1980s and 1990s, U.S. officials identified Iran’s support for militant Middle East groups as the primary threat posed by Iran to U.S. interests and allies. Iran’s nuclear program took precedence in U.S. policy after 2002 as the potential for Iran to develop a nuclear weapon increased. In 2010, the Obama Administration orchestrated broad international economic pressure on Iran to persuade it to agree to strict limits on the program. The pressure contributed to the June 2013 election of the relatively moderate Hassan Rouhani as president of Iran and the July 2015 multilateral nuclear agreement—the “Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action” (JCPOA). That agreement exchanged sanctions relief for limits on Iran’s nuclear program, but did not contain binding limits on Iran’s ballistic missile program or any curbs on its regional influence or its human rights abuses. The Trump Administration cited these deficiencies of the JCPOA in its May 8, 2018, announcement that the United States would exit the JCPOA and re-impose all U.S. secondary sanctions by November 4, 2018. The stated intent of Trump Administration policy is to apply maximum economic pressure on Iran to compel it to change its behavior on the various issues of concern to the United States, particularly its support for pro-Iranian regimes and armed factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Censorship of Poetry in Post-Revolutionary Iran (1979 to 2014), Growing up with Censorship (A Memoir), and the Kindly Interrogator (A Collection of Poetry)
    Censorship of Poetry in Post-Revolutionary Iran (1979 to 2014), Growing up with Censorship (A Memoir), and The Kindly Interrogator (A Collection of Poetry) Alireza Hassani This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Newcastle University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of English Literature, Language and Linguistics Department of Creative Writing November 2015 Abstract The thesis comprises a dissertation, a linking piece and a collection of poems. The dissertation is an analysis of state-imposed censorship in Iranian poetry from 1979 through 2014. It investigates the state's rationale for censorship, its mechanism and its effects in order to show how censorship has influenced the trends in poetry and the creativity of poets during the period studied. The introduction outlines attitudes towards censorship in three different categories: Firstly, censorship as "good and necessary", then censorship as "fundamentally wrong yet harmless or even beneficial to poetry", and lastly, censorship as a force that is always destructive and damages poetry. Chapter one investigates the relevant laws, theories and cultural policies in order to identify the underlying causes for censorship of poetry. Chapter two looks at the structure and mechanism of the censorship apparatus and examines the role of cultural organizations as well as judicial and security forces in enforcing censorship. Chapter three contemplates and explores the reaction of Iranian poets to censorship and different strategies and techniques they adopt to protest, challenge and circumvent censorship. Chapter four analyses the outcome of the relationship between the censorship apparatus and the poets, providing a clear picture of how censorship defines, shapes and presents the poetry produced and published in Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • International Relations and the Iranian Post-Elections Show-Trials
    The Sovereign’s Confessions: International Relations and the Iranian Post-Elections Show-Trials Setareh Shohadaei, University of Victoria Abstract Following the controversial 2009 presidential elections in Iran, a series of mass trials were conducted publicizing the confessions of key reformist figures as well as other dissidents. The confessions were widely criticized as theatrical, based on reports of human rights abuses, torture, and judicial procedural offences. This critique, however, often labelled the trials as either barbaric acts of terror, or at best as unintelligent failures of the Iranian government. In this paper, I engage with the most serious of such analyses, arguing that the show-trials are not mere strategic errors on the part of the regime; rather, a more in-depth structural analysis of the concept of sovereignty is required to understand the enabling condition of the trials. Sovereignty both in its domestic and international functions operates paradoxically insofar as it cannot overcome the crisis of representation with respect to the question of foundation. It is thus necessary to understand the show-trials as a sovereign move towards a logic of simulation. Baudrillard’s concept of simulacrum is key to understanding the performance of the confession which postulates the unreal sovereign foundation as the latter’s hyperreal representation. I further propose that the disciplinary society of the international is not one simply judging the authenticity of the trials, but more importantly, it is judging the reality of statehood and thus sovereignty. In this sense, the Iranian trials can be conceptualized as sovereignty confessing itself into the hyperreal. 108 Illumine: Journal of the Centre for Studies in Religion and Society Graduate Students Association, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran – Verso Le Elezioni Del 14 Marzo
    XV legislatura IRAN – VERSO LE ELEZIONI DEL 14 MARZO Contributi di Istituti di ricerca specializzati n. 89 Marzo 2008 XV legislatura IRAN - VERSO LE ELEZIONI DEL 14 MARZO A cura di Luca La Bella, del Centro Studi Internazionali (Ce.S.I) n. 89 Marzo 2008 Servizio Studi Servizio affari internazionali Direttore Direttore Daniele Ravenna tel. 06 6706_2451 Maria Valeria Agostini tel. 06 6706_2405 Segreteria _2451 Segreteria _2989 _2629 _3666 Fax 06 6706_3588 Fax 06 6706_4336 1 SOMMARIO 1. Generalità p.3 2. Sistema politico in vigore p.7 3. Attuale panorama politico p.14 4. Considerazioni Conclusive p.22 Allegati: “A”: Quadro Paese p.29 “B”: Panorama etnico e religioso p.49 2 3 1. Generalità (Fonte www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/iran.html - Elaborazione Ce.S.I.) 4 La Repubblica Islamica dell’Iran si avvia all’importante scadenza del 14 marzo, elezioni parlamentari, in un contesto di situazione caratterizzato da considerevoli criticità in vari settori della vita del Paese, dopo tre anni di Governo del Presidente Ahmadinejad, Governo che sembra aver annullato i pur timidi tentativi di maggior democratizzazione della società e di normalizzazione delle relazioni con il mondo esterno, avviati dal predecessore Khatami (1997-2005). I fattori di criticità che hanno riguardato settori significativi della vita del Paese, sono sintetizzati di seguito. Occorre tuttavia considerare che un quadro Paese più dettagliato è riportato nell’Allegato “A” al presente documento e che l’analisi è rivolta prioritariamente al complesso sistema politico in vigore e al panorama delle tendenze evidenziatesi in vista del 14 marzo. Alle elezioni parlamentari è prevista la partecipazione di 47 milioni di cittadini, per l’assegnazione dei 290 seggi del Parlamento unicamerale (Majlis), inclusi i 30 seggi per la provincia di Teheran, la più importante politicamente.
    [Show full text]