Biogeosciences, 12, 991–1006, 2015 www.biogeosciences.net/12/991/2015/ doi:10.5194/bg-12-991-2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Pigment signatures of phytoplankton communities in the Beaufort Sea P. Coupel1, A. Matsuoka1, D. Ruiz-Pino2, M. Gosselin3, D. Marie4, J.-É. Tremblay1, and M. Babin1 1Joint International ULaval-CNRS Laboratory Takuvik, Québec-Océan, Département de Biologie, Université Laval, Québec, Québec G1V 0A6, Canada 2Laboratoire d’Océanographie et du Climat: Expérimentation et Approches Numériques (LOCEAN), UPMC, CNRS, UMR 7159, Paris, France 3Institut des sciences de la mer de Rimouski (ISMER), Université du Québec à Rimouski, 310 allée des Ursulines, Rimouski, Québec G5L 3A1, Canada 4Station Biologique, CNRS, UMR 7144, INSU et Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Place George Teissier, 29680 Roscoff, France Correspondence to: P. Coupel (
[email protected]) Received: 11 August 2014 – Published in Biogeosciences Discuss.: 13 October 2014 Revised: 15 December 2014 – Accepted: 30 December 2014 – Published: 17 February 2015 Abstract. Phytoplankton are expected to respond to recent potentially leads to incorrect group assignments and some environmental changes of the Arctic Ocean. In terms of misinterpretation of CHEMTAX. Thanks to the high repro- bottom-up control, modifying the phytoplankton distribution ducibility of pigment analysis, our results can serve as a base- will ultimately affect the entire food web and carbon export. line to assess change and spatial or temporal variability in However, detecting and quantifying changes in phytoplank- several phytoplankton populations that are not affected by ton communities in the Arctic Ocean remains difficult be- these misinterpretations. cause of the lack of data and the inconsistent identification methods used.