Central Yukon Resource Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement I Preliminary Alternatives Concepts Public Comment Summary Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Central Yukon Resource Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement I Preliminary Alternatives Concepts Public Comment Summary Report U.S. Department of the Interior July 2017 Bureau of Land Management Central Yukon Field Office Central Yukon Resource Management Plan/ Environmental Impact Statement Preliminary Alternatives Concepts Public Comment Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose of and Need for the Resource Management Plan ................................................ 1-2 1.3 Description of the Planning Area and Decision Area .......................................................... 1-2 1.4 Description of Alternatives Development Process .............................................................. 1-3 1.5 Description of the Public Involvement Process for the Public Review of Preliminary Alternatives Concepts ........................................................................................... 1-4 1.5.1 Public Meetings ............................................................................................................... 1-4 1.5.2 Mailing List and Postcard ............................................................................................. 1-5 1.5.3 Newspaper Advertisements and News Releases ................................................... 1-6 1.5.4 Project Website ............................................................................................................. 1-6 2. COMMENT SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Method of Comment Collection and Analysis ...................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Summary of Public Comments .................................................................................................. 2-3 2.2.1 Commenter Information .............................................................................................. 2-3 2.2.2 Number of Comments by Category ......................................................................... 2-4 2.2.3 Summary of Comments Received at Public Meetings ........................................... 2-4 2.2.4 Summaries of Comments Related to Alternatives ................................................ 2-9 3. FUTURE STEPS .............................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Future Steps and Public Participation Opportunities ........................................................... 3-1 3.2 Contact Information .................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.2.1 Contacts ........................................................................................................................... 3-2 4. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 4-1 TABLES Page 1-1 Public Alternatives Meetings ..................................................................................................................... 1-5 1-2 Newspaper Advertisement Publication Dates and Location ............................................................. 1-6 2-1 Submissions by Geographic Location ...................................................................................................... 2-3 2-2 Comments by Category ............................................................................................................................. 2-4 2-3 Public Meeting Discussion Topics and Concerns................................................................................. 2-4 APPENDICES A Preliminary Alternatives Concepts Outreach Materials B Comments by Category C List of Commenters July 2017 Central Yukon Resource Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement i Preliminary Alternatives Concepts Public Comment Summary Report ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Full Phrase ACEC areas of critical environmental concern ANCSA Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act ANILCA Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act BEACONS Boreal Ecosystems Analysis for Conservation Networks BLM United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management CEQ Council of Environmental Quality CFR Code of Federal Regulations CSU conservation system unit CYRMP Central Yukon Resource Management Plan EIS environmental impact statement FLPMA Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 NEPA National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 NPS United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service NWR National Wildlife Refuge PLO Public Land Order RMP resource management plan RNA research natural area ROD Record of Decision ROW right-of-way SRMA special recreation management area TAPs Trans-Alaska Pipeline System USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service ii Central Yukon Resource Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement July 2017 Preliminary Alternatives Concepts Public Comment Summary Report CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND The United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Central Yukon Field Office is preparing a resource management plan (RMP) with an associated environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Central Yukon Planning Area under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The BLM’s RMPs form the basis for every action and approved use on the public lands. The BLM prepares RMPs for areas of public lands, called planning areas. Planning emphasizes a collaborative environment in which local, state, and tribal governments; the public; user groups; and industry work with the BLM to identify appropriate multiple uses of public lands. Plans are periodically revised as changing conditions and resource demands require. Through an evaluation of the existing plans, the BLM has decided that revisions are needed to the Utility Corridor RMP (BLM 1991), Central Yukon RMP (BLM 1986), and Southwest Management Framework Plan (BLM 1981). The revised Central Yukon RMP (CYRMP) will replace both the Utility Corridor and Central Yukon RMPs in their entirety and a small part of the Southwest Management Framework Plan. This report summarizes results of the preliminary alternatives concepts outreach phase of the NEPA planning process. This phase is one of several opportunities for the public to offer input on the RMP/EIS. Appendix A, Preliminary Alternatives Concepts Outreach Materials, item 1—NEPA Planning Process Handout, shows all phases of the RMP process. The alternatives outreach was conducted to offer the public the opportunity to review preliminary alternatives concepts (Appendix A, item 2—Preliminary Alternatives Concepts Handout) that were developed by the BLM in coordination with cooperating agencies. The public was invited to participate in 12 public alternatives meetings and to offer comments during the 60-day comment period; more information is included in Section 1.5, Description of July 2017 Central Yukon Resource Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement 1-1 Preliminary Alternatives Concepts Public Comment Summary Report 1. Introduction (Background) the Public Involvement Process for the Public Review of Preliminary Alternatives Concepts. Prior to this public review of preliminary alternatives concepts, the BLM conducted public scoping from June 14, 2013, to January 17, 2014. Scoping is an early and open process to determine the scope of issues surrounding the proposed actions and to identify significant issues. Public input during scoping helps the BLM to understand the issues that the public would like the agency to address as they develop the RMP. A summary of the results from public scoping has been published in a public scoping report (BLM 2015), which can be found on the project website (see Section 1.5.4, Project Website). 1.2 PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN The purpose of the CYRMP is to develop decisions to guide future land management within the planning area and subsequent site-specific projects. These decisions establish goals and objectives (desired outcomes) for day-to-day and long-term resource management. To achieve these goals and objectives, the RMP identifies uses (allocations) that are allowable, restricted, or prohibited. Management decisions include measures or criteria, such as desired outcomes (goals and objectives); administrative designations, such as areas of critical environmental concern (ACECs); proposed withdrawals; and suitability for congressional designations, such as an addition to the National Wild and Scenic River System. All decisions conform to the multiple use and sustained yield mandate of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA). The need for the CYRMP is to provide guidance and to address changes in resources, circumstances, laws, policies, and regulations in the planning area since the existing plans were developed in the 1980s and 1990s. The planning area includes identified corridors for utility and transportation projects, such as identified routes for multiple roads in the State of Alaska’s Roads to Resources initiative. The existing plans were completed when gold prices were a fraction of the current price; hence, development pressures related to access and mining activity have increased considerably, as has the demand for sand and gravel. The revised CYRMP will be more relevant to current and future issues
Recommended publications
  • Sabbatical Leave Report 2019 – 2020
    Sabbatical Leave Report 2019 – 2020 James MacDevitt, M.A. Associate Professor of Art History and Visual & Cultural Studies Director, Cerritos College Art Gallery Department of Art and Design Fine Arts and Communications Division Cerritos College January 2021 Table of Contents Title Page i Table of Contents ii Sabbatical Leave Application iii Statement of Purpose 35 Objectives and Outcomes 36 OER Textbook: Disciplinary Entanglements 36 Getty PST Art x Science x LA Research Grant Application 37 Conference Presentation: Just Futures 38 Academic Publication: Algorithmic Culture 38 Service and Practical Application 39 Concluding Statement 40 Appendix List (A-E) 41 A. Disciplinary Entanglements | Table of Contents 42 B. Disciplinary Entanglements | Screenshots 70 C. Getty PST Art x Science x LA | Research Grant Application 78 D. Algorithmic Culture | Book and Chapter Details 101 E. Just Futures | Conference and Presentation Details 103 2 SABBATICAL LEAVE APPLICATION TO: Dr. Rick Miranda, Jr., Vice President of Academic Affairs FROM: James MacDevitt, Associate Professor of Visual & Cultural Studies DATE: October 30, 2018 SUBJECT: Request for Sabbatical Leave for the 2019-20 School Year I. REQUEST FOR SABBATICAL LEAVE. I am requesting a 100% sabbatical leave for the 2019-2020 academic year. Employed as a fulltime faculty member at Cerritos College since August 2005, I have never requested sabbatical leave during the past thirteen years of service. II. PURPOSE OF LEAVE Scientific advancements and technological capabilities, most notably within the last few decades, have evolved at ever-accelerating rates. Artists, like everyone else, now live in a contemporary world completely restructured by recent phenomena such as satellite imagery, augmented reality, digital surveillance, mass extinctions, artificial intelligence, prosthetic limbs, climate change, big data, genetic modification, drone warfare, biometrics, computer viruses, and social media (and that’s by no means meant to be an all-inclusive list).
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION in Re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMEN
    USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 1 of 354 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) Case No. 3:05-MD-527 RLM In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE ) (MDL 1700) SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT ) PRACTICES LITIGATION ) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) ) Carlene Craig, et. al. v. FedEx Case No. 3:05-cv-530 RLM ) Ground Package Systems, Inc., ) ) PROPOSED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 11, 2019, to consider final approval of the proposed ERISA Class Action Settlement reached by and between Plaintiffs Leo Rittenhouse, Jeff Bramlage, Lawrence Liable, Kent Whistler, Mike Moore, Keith Berry, Matthew Cook, Heidi Law, Sylvia O’Brien, Neal Bergkamp, and Dominic Lupo1 (collectively, “the Named Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Certified Class, and Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FXG”) (collectively, “the Parties”), the terms of which Settlement are set forth in the Class Action Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit A to the Joint Declaration of Co-Lead Counsel in support of Preliminary Approval of the Kansas Class Action 1 Carlene Craig withdrew as a Named Plaintiff on November 29, 2006. See MDL Doc. No. 409. Named Plaintiffs Ronald Perry and Alan Pacheco are not movants for final approval and filed an objection [MDL Doc. Nos. 3251/3261]. USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 2 of 354 Settlement [MDL Doc. No. 3154-1]. Also before the Court is ERISA Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees and for Payment of Service Awards to the Named Plaintiffs, filed with the Court on October 19, 2018 [MDL Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Oral History Off Ice University of California the Bancroft Library Berkeley, California
    Regional Oral History Off ice University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Richard B. Gump COMPOSER, ARTIST, AND PRESIDENT OF GUMP'S, SAN FRANCISCO An Interview Conducted by Suzanne B. Riess in 1987 Copyright @ 1989 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West,and the Nation. Oral history is a modern research technique involving an interviewee and an informed interviewer in spontaneous conversation. The taped record is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The resulting manuscript is typed in final form, indexed, bound with photographs and illustrative materials, and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between the University of California and Richard B. Gump dated 7 March 1988. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the Director of The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Alumnus
    The Montana Alumnus Official Quarterly of The Alumni Association of the Slate University of Montana TRIBUTE TO MONTANA FOOTBALL GLIMPSES NEW FACULTY ALUMNI ACTIVITIES UNIVERSITY NOTES CLASS NOTES Volume XI NO. 2 Published in October, January, April, and July at Missoula, Montana )o; ®1|? iflmttmta Alumnus Published in October, January, April, and July by the Alumni Association of the State University of Montana. Subscription: 75c a year; subscription and annual dues of the Alumni Association combined, $1.50 a year. Printed by the School of Journalism Press, State University of M ontana. Entered as second-class matter November 1, 1922, at the postoffice a t M issoula, M ontana, under the A ct of M arch 3, 1879. Jessie Treichler, '29, Editor. Henrietta Wilhelm, ’25* Editor of Class Notes. THE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA JO H N PA TTERSO N , '20 ............................................................................... President BU RTT R. SMITH, ’27....................................................................................... Vice-President E. K. BADGLEY, '24 ..................................... Secretary-Treasurer DELEGATES TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OAKLEY E. C O FFEE, '23 .......................................................................................................... Three-Y ear Delegate ROGER FLEM IN G , '26 .................................................................................................................Three-Y ear Delegate GORDON D. ROGNLIEN, '30......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download New Glass Review 21
    NewG lass The Corning Museum of Glass NewGlass Review 21 The Corning Museum of Glass Corning, New York 2000 Objects reproduced in this annual review Objekte, die in dieser jahrlich erscheinenden were chosen with the understanding Zeitschrift veroffentlicht werden, wurden unter that they were designed and made within der Voraussetzung ausgewahlt, dass sie in- the 1999 calendar year. nerhalb des Kalenderjahres 1999 entworfen und gefertigt wurden. For additional copies of New Glass Review, Zusatzliche Exemplare der New Glass please contact: Review konnen angefordert werden bei: The Corning Museum of Glass Buying Office One Corning Glass Center Corning, New York 14830-2253 Telephone: (607) 974-6479 Fax: (607) 974-7365 E-mail: [email protected] All rights reserved, 2000 Alle Rechte vorbehalten, 2000 The Corning Museum of Glass The Corning Museum of Glass Corning, New York 14830-2253 Corning, New York 14830-2253 Printed in Frechen, Germany Gedruckt in Frechen, Bundesrepublik Deutschland Standard Book Number 0-87290-147-5 ISSN: 0275-469X Library of Congress Catalog Card Number Aufgefuhrt im Katalog der Library of Congress 81-641214 unter der Nummer 81-641214 Table of Contents/In halt Page/Seite Jury Statements/Statements der Jury 4 Artists and Objects/Kunstlerlnnen und Objekte 16 1999 in Review/Ruckblick auf 1999 36 Bibliography/Bibliografie 44 A Selective Index of Proper Names and Places/ Ausgewahltes Register von Eigennamen und Orten 73 Jury Statements Here is 2000, and where is art? Hier ist das Jahr 2000, und wo ist die Kunst? Although more people believe they make art than ever before, it is a Obwohl mehr Menschen als je zuvor glauben, sie machen Kunst, "definitionless" word about which a lot of people disagree.
    [Show full text]
  • GSA TODAY North-Central, P
    Vol. 9, No. 10 October 1999 INSIDE • 1999 Honorary Fellows, p. 16 • Awards Nominations, p. 18, 20 • 2000 Section Meetings GSA TODAY North-Central, p. 27 A Publication of the Geological Society of America Rocky Mountain, p. 28 Cordilleran, p. 30 Refining Rodinia: Geologic Evidence for the Australia–Western U.S. connection in the Proterozoic Karl E. Karlstrom, [email protected], Stephen S. Harlan*, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 Michael L. Williams, Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003-5820, [email protected] James McLelland, Department of Geology, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY 13346, [email protected] John W. Geissman, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, [email protected] Karl-Inge Åhäll, Earth Sciences Centre, Göteborg University, Box 460, SE-405 30 Göteborg, Sweden, [email protected] ABSTRACT BALTICA Prior to the Grenvillian continent- continent collision at about 1.0 Ga, the southern margin of Laurentia was a long-lived convergent margin that SWEAT TRANSSCANDINAVIAN extended from Greenland to southern W. GOTHIAM California. The truncation of these 1.8–1.0 Ga orogenic belts in southwest- ern and northeastern Laurentia suggests KETILIDEAN that they once extended farther. We propose that Australia contains the con- tinuation of these belts to the southwest LABRADORIAN and that Baltica was the continuation to the northeast. The combined orogenic LAURENTIA system was comparable in
    [Show full text]
  • Program Lists the Abstracts for All Submissions for GREAT Day(S) 2021
    the 15th annual virtual monday april 26, 2021 - friday april 30, 2021 geneseo recognizing excellence, achievement, and talent th 2021 Geneseo Recognizing Excellence Achievement and Talent Day • 15 Annual Welcome to SUNY Geneseo’s Fifteenth Annual GREAT Day(s)! Geneseo Recognizing Excellence, Achievement & Talent Day is a college-wide symposium celebrating the creative and scholarly endeavors of our students. In addition to recognizing the achievements of our students, the purpose of GREAT Day is to help foster academic excellence, encourage professional development, and build connections within the community. http://www.geneseo.edu/great_day This program lists the abstracts for all submissions for GREAT Day(s) 2021. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, GREAT Day(s) 2021 is happening virtually and will be held during the week of April 26th – April 30th. The keynote address by Dr. Adam Frank will be held synchronously on Wednesday, April 28th at 2:30 PM. Scholarly and creative projects in a variety of formats will be available for viewing beginning April 26th. To view presentations, check the Virtual Program on the GREAT Day webpage at: http://www.geneseo.edu/great_day GREAT Day often falls on or near Earth Day, which is held on April 22nd each year. In recognition of this, presentations that have been self- identified by students as promoting sustainability are designated by a leaf symbol - - in this program. Throughout the day, when you post about GREAT Day(s) on social media use #WeAreGREAT to be featured on GREAT Day social media! GreatDayGeneseo @GeneseoGREATDay geneseo.edu/great_day 2 2021 Geneseo Recognizing Excellence Achievement and Talent Day • 15th Annual Honors TABLE OF CONTENTS Program reflects updates as of April 25, 2021 GREAT Day Honors ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • For André Breton)
    Published by Peculiar Mormyrid peculiarmormyrid.com All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher or author. Texts Copyright © The Authors Images Copyright © The Artists Direction: Angel Therese Dionne, Casi Cline, Steven Cline, Patrik Sampler, Jason Abdelhadi Cover Art by Ody Saban ISBN 978-1-365-09136-0 First Edition 2016 CONTRIBUTORS Jason Abdelhadi Rik Lina Elise Aru Michaël Löwy Johannes Bergmark Renzo Margonari Jay Blackwood Rithika Merchant Anny Bonnin Paul McRandle Bruce Boston Andrew Mendez Maurizio Brancaleoni Steve Morrrison Cassandra Carter David Nadeau Miguel de Carvalho Valery Oisteanu Claude Cauët Ana Orozco Casi Cline Jaan Patterson Steven Cline Toby Penny Paul Cowdell Mitchell Poor Ashley DeFlaminis Evelyn Postic Angel Dionne Jean-Raphaël Prieto Richard Dotson John Richardson Guy Ducornet Penelope Rosemont Alfredo Fernandes Ody Saban Daniel Fierro Ron Sakolsky Mattias Forshage Patrik Sampler Joël Gayraud Nelly Sanchez Guy Girard Mark Sanders Jon Graham Pierre-André Sauvageot Jean-Pierre Guillon Matt Schumacher Janice Hathaway Scheherazade Siobhan Nicholas Hayes Arthur Spota Sherri Higgins Dan Stanciu Dale Houstman Virginia Tentindo Karl Howeth TD Typaldos Stuart Inman Tamara K. Walker James Jackson John Welson Alex Januário Craig Wilson Philip Kane William Wolak Stelli Kerk İzem Yaşın Stephen Kirin Mark Young Megan Leach Michel Zimbacca CONTENTS PAS UN CADAVRE:
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2005
    NATIONAL GALLERY BOARD OF TRUSTEES (as of 30 September 2005) Victoria P. Sant John C. Fontaine Chairman Chair Earl A. Powell III Frederick W. Beinecke Robert F. Erburu Heidi L. Berry John C. Fontaine W. Russell G. Byers, Jr. Sharon P. Rockefeller Melvin S. Cohen John Wilmerding Edwin L. Cox Robert W. Duemling James T. Dyke Victoria P. Sant Barney A. Ebsworth Chairman Mark D. Ein John W. Snow Gregory W. Fazakerley Secretary of the Treasury Doris Fisher Robert F. Erburu Victoria P. Sant Robert F. Erburu Aaron I. Fleischman Chairman President John C. Fontaine Juliet C. Folger Sharon P. Rockefeller John Freidenrich John Wilmerding Marina K. French Morton Funger Lenore Greenberg Robert F. Erburu Rose Ellen Meyerhoff Greene Chairman Richard C. Hedreen John W. Snow Eric H. Holder, Jr. Secretary of the Treasury Victoria P. Sant Robert J. Hurst Alberto Ibarguen John C. Fontaine Betsy K. Karel Sharon P. Rockefeller Linda H. Kaufman John Wilmerding James V. Kimsey Mark J. Kington Robert L. Kirk Ruth Carter Stevenson Leonard A. Lauder Alexander M. Laughlin Alexander M. Laughlin Robert H. Smith LaSalle D. Leffall Julian Ganz, Jr. Joyce Menschel David O. Maxwell Harvey S. Shipley Miller Diane A. Nixon John Wilmerding John G. Roberts, Jr. John G. Pappajohn Chief Justice of the Victoria P. Sant United States President Sally Engelhard Pingree Earl A. Powell III Diana Prince Director Mitchell P. Rales Alan Shestack Catherine B. Reynolds Deputy Director David M. Rubenstein Elizabeth Cropper RogerW. Sant Dean, Center for Advanced Study in the Visual Arts B. Francis Saul II Darrell R. Willson Thomas A.
    [Show full text]
  • Bul Le Tin of the Global Vol Can Ism Net Work
    Bul le tin of the Global Vol can ism Net work Vol ume 28, Num ber 9, September 2003 Kilauea (USA) Active surface lava flows from June through mid-Oc tober ....................2 Katmai (USA) Strong winds re suspend old ash depos its, causing a large plume and distant ashfall ......3 Anatahan (Mariana Is lands) Very low seis micity with no ash emissions; geo thermal ac tivity in the crater ...4 Mayon (Phil ip pines) El e vated sul fur-di ox ide flux af ter mid-Sep tem ber; crater glow in Oc to ber ........4 Karangetang (In do ne sia) Ash explo sions and lava av a lanches in July; overall activ ity level decline s .....5 Dukono (In do ne sia) Ash explo sions in late July through Sep tem ber gen erate plumes up to 250 m high.....6 Gamalama (In do ne sia) Several small ash explo sions and gas emission through late Sep tem ber ........6 Tongkoko (In do ne sia) Vol ca nic earth quakes dur ing Oc to ber 2002-Jan u ary 2003 ...............6 Tandikat (In do ne sia) Brief ep i sode of in creased seis mic ity dur ing Jan u ary-Feb ru ary 2002 ..........7 Dieng (In do ne sia) One shallow volca nic earthquake and a gas plume in early August .............7 Semeru (In do ne sia) Fre quent ash ex plo sions con tinue through Sep tem ber ...................7 Manam (Pa pua New Guinea) Minor ashfall from Main Crater activ ity dur ing May ...............8 Pago (Pa pua New Guinea) Minor seismic ity and va por emissions ; no lava effu sion as of 22 May........8 Ulawun (Pa pua New Guinea) White vapor emissions from the main crater; offshore effer ves cence.......9
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-15445-2 — Mercury Edited by Sean C
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-15445-2 — Mercury Edited by Sean C. Solomon , Larry R. Nittler , Brian J. Anderson Index More Information INDEX 253 Mathilde, 196 BepiColombo, 46, 109, 134, 136, 138, 279, 314, 315, 366, 403, 463, 2P/Encke, 392 487, 488, 535, 544, 546, 547, 548–562, 563, 564, 565 4 Vesta, 195, 196, 350 BELA. See BepiColombo: BepiColombo Laser Altimeter 433 Eros, 195, 196, 339 BepiColombo Laser Altimeter, 554, 557, 558 gravity assists, 555 activation energy, 409, 412 gyroscope, 556 adiabat, 38 HGA. See BepiColombo: high-gain antenna adiabatic decompression melting, 38, 60, 168, 186 high-gain antenna, 556, 560 adiabatic gradient, 96 ISA. See BepiColombo: Italian Spring Accelerometer admittance, 64, 65, 74, 271 Italian Spring Accelerometer, 549, 554, 557, 558 aerodynamic fractionation, 507, 509 Magnetospheric Orbiter Sunshield and Interface, 552, 553, 555, 560 Airy isostasy, 64 MDM. See BepiColombo: Mercury Dust Monitor Al. See aluminum Mercury Dust Monitor, 554, 560–561 Al exosphere. See aluminum exosphere Mercury flybys, 555 albedo, 192, 198 Mercury Gamma-ray and Neutron Spectrometer, 554, 558 compared with other bodies, 196 Mercury Imaging X-ray Spectrometer, 558 Alfvén Mach number, 430, 433, 442, 463 Mercury Magnetospheric Orbiter, 552, 553, 554, 555, 556, 557, aluminum, 36, 38, 147, 177, 178–184, 185, 186, 209, 559–561 210 Mercury Orbiter Radio Science Experiment, 554, 556–558 aluminum exosphere, 371, 399–400, 403, 423–424 Mercury Planetary Orbiter, 366, 549, 550, 551, 552, 553, 554, 555, ground-based observations, 423 556–559, 560, 562 andesite, 179, 182, 183 Mercury Plasma Particle Experiment, 554, 561 Andrade creep function, 100 Mercury Sodium Atmospheric Spectral Imager, 554, 561 Andrade rheological model, 100 Mercury Thermal Infrared Spectrometer, 366, 554, 557–558 anorthosite, 30, 210 Mercury Transfer Module, 552, 553, 555, 561–562 anticline, 70, 251 MERTIS.
    [Show full text]
  • ALASKA HARBOR SEAL (Phoca Vitulina) CONTAMINANTS
    ALASKA HARBOR SEAL (Phoca vitulina) CONTAMINANTS A Review with Annotated Bibliography Rebecca S. Papa Paul R. Becker U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST Charleston Laboratory Charleston, SC 29412 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Technology Administration National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899-0001 QC TOO .U56 NO. 6211 1998 ALASKA HARBOR SEAL {Phoca vitulina) CONTAMINANTS A Review with Annotated Bibliography Rebecca S. Papa Paul R. Becker National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST Charleston Laboratory 219 Fort Johnson Road Charleston, SC 29412 October 1998 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE William M. Daley, Secretary TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION Gary Bachula, Acting Under Secretary for Technology NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY Raymond G. Kammer, Director CONTENTS page Tables iv Figures iv Preface v A cknowledgem ents vi Disclaimer vi SECTION I: CONTAMINANTS IN ALASKA HARBOR SEALS: A SUMMARY OF THE AVAILABLE DATA 1 Background 2 Heavy Metals 4 Persistent Organic Pollutants 11 Contaminant Levels and Health Effects : 30 Conclusions and Recomendations 33 SECTION II: DATA TABLES 37 Table 2. 1 . Mean Concentrations of Metals and Metalloids in Harbor Seals, Phoca vitulina, from Alaska 38 Table 2.2. Mean Concentrations of Metals and Metalloids in Harbor Seals, Phoca vitulina, from the U.S. Outside of Alaska 39 Table 2.3. Mean Concentrations of Metals and Metalloids in Harbor Seals, Phoca vitulina, from Regions Outside of the U.S 41 Table 2.4. Mean Concentrations of Persistent Organochlorine Contaminants in Harbor Seals, Phoca vitulina, from Alaska 49 Table 2.5. Mean Concentrations of Persistent Organochlorine Contaminants in Harbor Seals, Phoca vitulina, from the U.S.
    [Show full text]