Structural and Functional Characterization of Rubisco

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Structural and Functional Characterization of Rubisco Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Fakultät für Chemie und Pharmazie der Ludwig–Maximilians–Universität München Structural and functional characterization of Rubisco assembly chaperones Thomas Hauser aus Tübingen, Deutschland 2016 Erklärung Diese Dissertation wurde im Sinne von §7 der Promotionsordnung vom 28. November 2011 von Herrn Prof. Dr. F. Ulrich Hartl betreut. Eidesstattliche Versicherung Diese Dissertation wurde eigenständig und ohne unerlaubte Hilfe erarbeitet. München, 03.02.2016 _______________________ Thomas Hauser Dissertation eingereicht am: 25.02.2016 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. F. Ulrich Hartl 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Jörg Nickelsen Mündliche Prüfung am 28.04.2016 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements First of all, I am very thankful to Prof. Dr. F. Ulrich Hartl and Dr. Manajit Hayer-Hartl for giving me the opportunity to conduct my PhD in their department at the Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry. This work has benefited greatly from their scientific expertise and experience together with their intellectual ability to tackle fundamental scientific questions comprehensively. Their way of approaching complex projects has shaped my idea on how to perform science. I am very greatful to Dr. Andreas Bracher for giving crucial input and collaborating on many aspects on my work conducted in the department. His extensive crystallographic expertise was of great importance during my time as a PhD student. Furthermore, I want to thank Oliver Müller-Cajar for introducing me into the field of Rubisco and supporting me with help and suggestions in the beginning of my PhD. His enthusiasm about conducting science was of great importance to me and influenced my motivation to work and live science on a day- by-day lab basis enormously. Thanks to all the people in the Hartl lab, especially the “Rubisco group”, represented by Oliver Müller- Cajar, Mathias Stotz, Candace Tsai, Cuimin Liu and Amanda Windhof for the friendly, sophisticated and open-minded atmosphere. Their comments on my work have been inspiring for my study. It was always a pleasure being with them, in work as well as in private. I am thankful for the discussions with my thesis advisory committee members Prof. Dr. Jörg Nickelsen and Prof. Dr. Ute Vothknecht and for the support of the IMPRS organisation team Dr. Hans Joerg Schaeffer, Dr. Ingrid Wolf and Maximiliane Reif. I especially want to thank all collaborators within and outside of the Department. Dr. Petra Wendler and Goran Milicic for performing negative stain electron microscopy, Dr. Javaid Bhat for mass spectrometry, Karina Valer and the MPIB Crystallization facility. Thank you to Evelyn Frey-Royston, Silke Leuze-Bütün and Andrea Obermayr-Rauter for their administrative support as well as Emmanuel Burghardt, Romy Lange, Nadine Wischnewski, Elisabeth Schreil, Albert Ries and especially Anastacia Jungclaus for their technical support. I want to thank the members of my PhD comittee Prof. Dr. Jörg Nickelsen, Prof. Dr. Ute Vothknecht, Dr. Petra Wendler, Dr. Dietmar Martin, and Prof. Dr. Elena Conti for critical evaluation of this thesis. Of great importance during my stay in Munich were Amit Gupta, Timm Hassemer, Leonhardt Popilka, Tobias Neudegger, David Balchin, Christian Löw, and Mark Hipp. I am deeply obliged for countless memorable moments; they were colleagues and became friends. A special thank goes to my family. I am deeply grateful for their unlimited support since the beginning of my studies until the end of my PhD. Finally, I want to express my strongest gratitude to my darling Tanja for her invaluable support and love. You are most important to me and make my life meaningful. II Table of content Table of content Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Protein Folding ................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Molecular Chaperones .................................................................................................... 4 1.2.1 The chaperone concept ........................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 The Hsp70 system ................................................................................................... 7 1.2.3 Chaperonins ........................................................................................................... 10 1.2.4 Assembly chaperones ............................................................................................ 13 1.2.4.1 Nucleosome assembly ................................................................................... 13 1.2.4.2 Proteasome assembly .................................................................................... 14 1.2.4.3 Ribosome assembly ....................................................................................... 14 1.2.4.4 Pilus assembly ................................................................................................ 15 1.3 Photosynthesis ............................................................................................................. 16 1.3.1 Light-dependent reactions ...................................................................................... 17 1.3.2 Light-independent reactions / Calvin Benson Bassham cycle ............................... 19 1.3.3 Photorespiration ..................................................................................................... 21 1.3.4 Carbon concentrating mechamisms ....................................................................... 22 1.3.4.1 The Carboxysome .......................................................................................... 22 1.3.4.2 The pyrenoid ................................................................................................... 24 1.3.4.3 C4 and crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) photosynthesis....................... 24 1.4 Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) .................................... 25 1.4.1 Structure of Rubisco ............................................................................................... 25 1.4.2 Catalytic mechanism and regulation of Rubisco activity ........................................ 29 1.4.3 Rubisco: synthesis, folding and assembly ............................................................. 33 1.4.4 Role of auxiliary proteins in Rubisco biogenesis and function ............................... 38 1.5 Aim of the study ............................................................................................................ 50 2. Publications ........................................................................................................................ 51 2.1 Structure and mechanism of the Rubisco-assembly chaperone Raf1 .......................... 51 III Table of content 2.2 Structural Analysis of the Rubisco-Assembly Chaperone RbcX-II from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii ............................................................................................................................ 81 3. Additional unpublished results ............................................................................................ 99 3.1 Analysis of Raf1-RbcL interaction by RbcL peptide membrane ................................... 99 3.2 Raf1-RbcL binding is not affected by Mg2+, ATP and RuBP ....................................... 103 3.3 RbcS displaces Raf1 from RbcL8 at equimolar concentrations .................................. 105 3.4 Interaction of Raf1 with RbcS ..................................................................................... 106 3.5 Interaction of Raf1, Raf2 and RbcS ............................................................................ 108 3.6 In vitro reconstitution of plant Rubisco ........................................................................ 111 3.7 Analysis of eukaryotic RbcX-RbcL interaction ............................................................ 113 3.8 Functional analysis of eukaryotic RbcX ...................................................................... 116 3.9 A potential role for RbcX in Rubisco assembly in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii .......... 117 3.10 Interplay of Raf1 and RbcX in Rubisco assembly ..................................................... 119 4. Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 122 4.1 A new model for Raf1-mediated Rubisco assembly ................................................... 123 4.2 The role of eukaryotic RbcX in Rubisco assembly ..................................................... 123 4.3 Functional interplay between Raf1 and RbcX in Rubisco assembly ........................... 125 4.4 Plant Rubisco in vitro reconstitution ............................................................................ 128 5. Outlook ............................................................................................................................. 131 6. Material and Methods ....................................................................................................... 132 6.1 Materials ..................................................................................................................... 132 6.1.1 Chemicals ...........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Self-Inhibitory Nature of Metabolic Networks and Its Alleviation Through Compartmentalization
    ARTICLE Received 30 Oct 2016 | Accepted 23 May 2017 | Published 10 Jul 2017 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16018 OPEN The self-inhibitory nature of metabolic networks and its alleviation through compartmentalization Mohammad Tauqeer Alam1,2, Viridiana Olin-Sandoval1,3, Anna Stincone1,w, Markus A. Keller1,4, Aleksej Zelezniak1,5,6, Ben F. Luisi1 & Markus Ralser1,5 Metabolites can inhibit the enzymes that generate them. To explore the general nature of metabolic self-inhibition, we surveyed enzymological data accrued from a century of experimentation and generated a genome-scale enzyme-inhibition network. Enzyme inhibition is often driven by essential metabolites, affects the majority of biochemical processes, and is executed by a structured network whose topological organization is reflecting chemical similarities that exist between metabolites. Most inhibitory interactions are competitive, emerge in the close neighbourhood of the inhibited enzymes, and result from structural similarities between substrate and inhibitors. Structural constraints also explain one-third of allosteric inhibitors, a finding rationalized by crystallographic analysis of allosterically inhibited L-lactate dehydrogenase. Our findings suggest that the primary cause of metabolic enzyme inhibition is not the evolution of regulatory metabolite–enzyme interactions, but a finite structural diversity prevalent within the metabolome. In eukaryotes, compartmentalization minimizes inevitable enzyme inhibition and alleviates constraints that self-inhibition places on metabolism. 1 Department of Biochemistry and Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK. 2 Division of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK. 3 Department of Food Science and Technology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Me´dicas y Nutricio´n Salvador Zubira´n, Vasco de Quiroga 15, Tlalpan, 14080 Mexico City, Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Basis for the Sheddase Function of Human Meprin Β Metalloproteinase at the Plasma Membrane
    Structural basis for the sheddase function of human meprin β metalloproteinase at the plasma membrane Joan L. Arolasa, Claudia Broderb, Tamara Jeffersonb, Tibisay Guevaraa, Erwin E. Sterchic, Wolfram Boded, Walter Stöckere, Christoph Becker-Paulyb, and F. Xavier Gomis-Rütha,1 aProteolysis Laboratory, Department of Structural Biology, Molecular Biology Institute of Barcelona, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Barcelona Science Park, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain; bInstitute of Biochemistry, Unit for Degradomics of the Protease Web, University of Kiel, D-24118 Kiel, Germany; cInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Berne, CH-3012 Berne, Switzerland; dArbeitsgruppe Proteinaseforschung, Max-Planck-Institute für Biochemie, D-82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany; and eInstitute of Zoology, Cell and Matrix Biology, Johannes Gutenberg-University, D-55128 Mainz, Germany Edited by Brian W. Matthews, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, and approved August 22, 2012 (received for review June 29, 2012) Ectodomain shedding at the cell surface is a major mechanism to proteolysis” step within the membrane (1). This is the case for the regulate the extracellular and circulatory concentration or the processing of Notch ligand Delta1 and of APP, both carried out by activities of signaling proteins at the plasma membrane. Human γ-secretase after action of an α/β-secretase (11), and for signal- meprin β is a 145-kDa disulfide-linked homodimeric multidomain peptide peptidase, which removes remnants of the secretory pro- type-I membrane metallopeptidase that sheds membrane-bound tein translocation from the endoplasmic membrane (13). cytokines and growth factors, thereby contributing to inflammatory Recently, human meprin β (Mβ) was found to specifically pro- diseases, angiogenesis, and tumor progression.
    [Show full text]
  • Untying the Knot: Protein Quality Control in Inherited Cardiomyopathies
    Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-018-2194-0 INVITED REVIEW Untying the knot: protein quality control in inherited cardiomyopathies Larissa M. Dorsch1 & Maike Schuldt1 & Dora Knežević1 & Marit Wiersma1 & Diederik W. D. Kuster1 & Jolanda van der Velden1 & Bianca J. J. M. Brundel1 Received: 30 July 2018 /Accepted: 6 August 2018 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Mutations in genes encoding sarcomeric proteins are the most important causes of inherited cardiomyopathies, which are a major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Although genetic screening procedures for early disease detection have been improved significantly, treatment to prevent or delay mutation-induced cardiac disease onset is lacking. Recent findings indicate that loss of protein quality control (PQC) is a central factor in the disease pathology leading to derailment of cellular protein homeostasis. Loss of PQC includes impairment of heat shock proteins, the ubiquitin-proteasome system, and autophagy. This may result in accumulation of misfolded and aggregation-prone mutant proteins, loss of sarcomeric and cytoskeletal proteins, and, ultimately, loss of cardiac function. PQC derailment can be a direct effect of the mutation-induced activation, a compensa- tory mechanism due to mutation-induced cellular dysfunction or a consequence of the simultaneous occurrence of the mutation and a secondary hit. In this review, we discuss recent mechanistic findings on the role of proteostasis derailment in inherited cardiomyopathies, with special focus on sarcomeric gene mutations and possible therapeutic applications. Keywords Cardiomyopathy .Proteinqualitycontrol .Sarcomericmutation .Heatshockproteins .Ubiquitin-proteasomesystem . Autophagy Classification of cardiomyopathies occurring asymmetrically, and dilated CM (DCM), in which the presence of LV dilatation is accompanied by contractile Cardiomyopathies (CM) constitute one of the most common dysfunction [24].
    [Show full text]
  • Thiamin Biofortification of Crops
    Thiamin biofortification of crops Aymeric Goyera,b a Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97330, United States of America b Hermiston Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Oregon State University, Hermiston, OR 97838, United States of America Corresponding author: Aymeric Goyer [email protected] 1 Abstract Thiamin is essential for human health. While plants are the ultimate source of thiamin in most human diets, staple foods like white rice have low thiamin content. Therefore, populations whose diets are mainly based on low-thiamin staple crops suffer from thiamin deficiency. Biofortification of rice grain by engineering the thiamin biosynthesis pathway has recently been attempted, with up to fivefold increase in thiamin content in unpolished seeds. However, polished seeds that retain only the starchy endosperm had similar thiamin content than that of non-engineered plants. Various factors such as limited supply of precursors, limited activity of thiamin biosynthetic enzymes, dependence on maternal tissues to supply thiamin, or lack of thiamin stabilizing proteins may have hindered thiamin increase in the endosperm. Introduction Thiamin (vitamin B1), in its diphosphate form (ThDP), functions as a cofactor for key enzymes of carbohydrates and amino acid metabolism in all living organisms [1,2]. While plants, fungi and bacteria can synthesize thiamin de novo, humans cannot and must obtain it from food. Although plant foods are a major source of thiamin, some staple crops like rice contain relatively low amounts of thiamin. Industrialized milling of the rice grain that removes the outer layers of the seed, i.e. the pericarp, testa, nucellus, and aleurone layer, as well as the embryo (Figure 1), further depletes the grain’s thiamin content [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Family Classification with Neural Networks
    Protein Family Classification with Neural Networks Timothy K. Lee Tuan Nguyen Program in Biomedical Informatics Department of Statistics Stanford University Stanford University [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Understanding protein function from amino acid sequence is a fundamental prob- lem in biology. In this project, we explore how well we can represent biological function through examination of raw sequence alone. Using a large corpus of protein sequences and their annotated protein families, we learn dense vector rep- resentations for amino acid sequences using the co-occurrence statistics of short fragments. Then, using this representation, we experiment with several neural net- work architectures to train classifiers for protein family identification. We show good performance for a multi-class prediction problem with 589 protein family classes. 1 Introduction Next-generation sequencing technologies generate large amounts of biological sequence informa- tion in the form of DNA/RNA sequences. From DNA sequences we also know the amino acid sequences of proteins, which are the fundamental molecules that perform most biological functions. The functionality of a protein is thus encoded in the amino acid sequence and understanding the sequence-function relationship is a major challenge in bioinformatics. Investigating protein func- tional often involves structural studies (crystallography) or biochemical studies, which require time consuming efforts. Protein families are defined to group together proteins that share similar function, and the aim of our project is to predict protein family from raw sequence. We focus on training infor- mative vector representations for protein sequences and investigate various neural network models for the task of predicting a protein’s family.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyruvate-Phosphate Dikinase of Oxymonads and Parabasalia and the Evolution of Pyrophosphate-Dependent Glycolysis in Anaerobic Eukaryotes† Claudio H
    EUKARYOTIC CELL, Jan. 2006, p. 148–154 Vol. 5, No. 1 1535-9778/06/$08.00ϩ0 doi:10.1128/EC.5.1.148–154.2006 Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Pyruvate-Phosphate Dikinase of Oxymonads and Parabasalia and the Evolution of Pyrophosphate-Dependent Glycolysis in Anaerobic Eukaryotes† Claudio H. Slamovits and Patrick J. Keeling* Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Botany Department, University of British Columbia, 3529-6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada Received 29 September 2005/Accepted 8 November 2005 In pyrophosphate-dependent glycolysis, the ATP/ADP-dependent enzymes phosphofructokinase (PFK) and pyruvate kinase are replaced by the pyrophosphate-dependent PFK and pyruvate phosphate dikinase (PPDK), respectively. This variant of glycolysis is widespread among bacteria, but it also occurs in a few parasitic anaerobic eukaryotes such as Giardia and Entamoeba spp. We sequenced two genes for PPDK from the amitochondriate oxymonad Streblomastix strix and found evidence for PPDK in Trichomonas vaginalis and other parabasalia, where this enzyme was thought to be absent. The Streblomastix and Giardia genes may be related to one another, but those of Entamoeba and perhaps Trichomonas are distinct and more closely related to bacterial homologues. These findings suggest that pyrophosphate-dependent glycolysis is more widespread in eukaryotes than previously thought, enzymes from the pathway coexists with ATP-dependent more often than previously thought and may be spread by lateral transfer of genes for pyrophosphate-dependent enzymes from bacteria. Adaptation to anaerobic metabolism is a complex process (PPDK), respectively (for a comparison of these reactions, see involving changes to many proteins and pathways of critical reference 21).
    [Show full text]
  • Chlamydia Trachomatis-Containing Vacuole Serves As Deubiquitination
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Chlamydia trachomatis-containing vacuole serves as deubiquitination platform to stabilize Mcl-1 and to interfere with host defense Annette Fischer1, Kelly S Harrison2, Yesid Ramirez3, Daniela Auer1, Suvagata Roy Chowdhury1, Bhupesh K Prusty1, Florian Sauer3, Zoe Dimond2, Caroline Kisker3, P Scott Hefty2, Thomas Rudel1* 1Department of Microbiology, Biocenter, University of Wu¨ rzburg, Wu¨ rzburg, Germany; 2Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, lawrence, United States; 3Rudolf Virchow Center for Experimental Biomedicine, University of Wu¨ rzburg, Wu¨ rzburg, Germany Abstract Obligate intracellular Chlamydia trachomatis replicate in a membrane-bound vacuole called inclusion, which serves as a signaling interface with the host cell. Here, we show that the chlamydial deubiquitinating enzyme (Cdu) 1 localizes in the inclusion membrane and faces the cytosol with the active deubiquitinating enzyme domain. The structure of this domain revealed high similarity to mammalian deubiquitinases with a unique a-helix close to the substrate-binding pocket. We identified the apoptosis regulator Mcl-1 as a target that interacts with Cdu1 and is stabilized by deubiquitination at the chlamydial inclusion. A chlamydial transposon insertion mutant in the Cdu1-encoding gene exhibited increased Mcl-1 and inclusion ubiquitination and reduced Mcl- 1 stabilization. Additionally, inactivation of Cdu1 led to increased sensitivity of C. trachomatis for IFNg and impaired infection in mice. Thus, the chlamydial inclusion serves as an enriched site for a *For correspondence: thomas. deubiquitinating activity exerting a function in selective stabilization of host proteins and [email protected]. protection from host defense. de DOI: 10.7554/eLife.21465.001 Competing interests: The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the Heterooligomeric Red-Type Rubisco Activase from Red Algae
    Characterization of the heterooligomeric red-type rubisco activase from red algae Nitin Loganathana, Yi-Chin Candace Tsaia, and Oliver Mueller-Cajara,1 aSchool of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637551 Edited by Sue Wickner, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, and approved October 28, 2016 (received for review July 2, 2016) The photosynthetic CO2-fixing enzyme ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate car- Three distantly related classes of Rcas (green, red, and CbbQO boxylase/oxygenase (rubisco) is inhibited by nonproductive binding types) have been identified so far (13–16). They all belong to the + of its substrate ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) and other sugar superfamily of AAA (ATPases associated with various cellular phosphates. Reactivation requires ATP-hydrolysis–powered remodel- activities) proteins (17) and function as ring-shaped hexamers that ing of the inhibited complexes by diverse molecular chaperones couple the energy of ATP hydrolysis to rubisco remodeling. known as rubisco activases (Rcas). Eukaryotic phytoplankton of the CbbQO requires one adaptor protein CbbO to associate with the red plastid lineage contain so-called red-type rubiscos, some of which AAA hexamer CbbQ6 to function (15). Common themes in the have been shown to possess superior kinetic properties to green-type activation mechanism are emerging (such as manipulation of rubiscos found in higher plants. These organisms are known to en- the large subunit C terminus for red-type Rca and CbbQO), al- code multiple homologs of CbbX, the α-proteobacterial red-type acti- though clear differences are also apparent (3, 12, 15). vase. Here we show that the gene products of two cbbX genes Following the primary endosymbiotic event, the green plastid encoded by the nuclear and plastid genomes of the red algae lineage toward green algae and plants retained the green-type form Cyanidioschyzon merolae are nonfunctional in isolation, but together IB rubisco from the cyanobacterial ancestor.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell & Molecular Biology
    BSC ZO- 102 B. Sc. I YEAR CELL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY SCHOOL OF SCIENCES UTTARAKHAND OPEN UNIVERSITY BSCZO-102 Cell and Molecular Biology DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY SCHOOL OF SCIENCES UTTARAKHAND OPEN UNIVERSITY Phone No. 05946-261122, 261123 Toll free No. 18001804025 Fax No. 05946-264232, E. mail [email protected] htpp://uou.ac.in Board of Studies and Programme Coordinator Board of Studies Prof. B.D.Joshi Prof. H.C.S.Bisht Retd.Prof. Department of Zoology Department of Zoology DSB Campus, Kumaun University, Gurukul Kangri, University Nainital Haridwar Prof. H.C.Tiwari Dr.N.N.Pandey Retd. Prof. & Principal Senior Scientist, Department of Zoology, Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries MB Govt.PG College (ICAR) Haldwani Nainital. Bhimtal (Nainital). Dr. Shyam S.Kunjwal Department of Zoology School of Sciences, Uttarakhand Open University Programme Coordinator Dr. Shyam S.Kunjwal Department of Zoology School of Sciences, Uttarakhand Open University Haldwani, Nainital Unit writing and Editing Editor Writer Dr.(Ms) Meenu Vats Dr.Mamtesh Kumari , Professor & Head Associate. Professor Department of Zoology, Department of Zoology DAV College,Sector-10 Govt. PG College Chandigarh-160011 Uttarkashi (Uttarakhand) Dr.Sunil Bhandari Asstt. Professor. Department of Zoology BGR Campus Pauri, HNB (Central University) Garhwal. Course Title and Code : Cell and Molecular Biology (BSCZO 102) ISBN : 978-93-85740-54-1 Copyright : Uttarakhand Open University Edition : 2017 Published By : Uttarakhand Open University, Haldwani, Nainital- 263139 Contents Course 1: Cell and Molecular Biology Course code: BSCZO102 Credit: 3 Unit Block and Unit title Page number Number Block 1 Cell Biology or Cytology 1-128 1 Cell Type : History and origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Chaperones & Stress Responses
    Abstracts of papers presented at the 2010 meeting on MOLECULAR CHAPERONES & STRESS RESPONSES May 4–May 8, 2010 CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cold Spring Harbor, New York Abstracts of papers presented at the 2010 meeting on MOLECULAR CHAPERONES & STRESS RESPONSES May 4–May 8, 2010 Arranged by F. Ulrich Hartl, Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Germany David Ron, New York University School of Medicine Jonathan Weissman, HHMI/University of California, San Francisco Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cold Spring Harbor, New York This meeting was funded in part by the National Institute on Aging; the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute; and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences; branches of the National Institutes of Health; and Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. Contributions from the following companies provide core support for the Cold Spring Harbor meetings program. Corporate Sponsors Agilent Technologies Life Technologies (Invitrogen & AstraZeneca Applied Biosystems) BioVentures, Inc. Merck (Schering-Plough) Research Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Laboratories Genentech, Inc. New England BioLabs, Inc. GlaxoSmithKline OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. Sanofi-Aventis Plant Corporate Associates Monsanto Company Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Foundations Hudson-Alpha Institute for Biotechnology Front cover, top: HSP90, a regulator of cell survival. Inhibition of HSP90 activity by drugs like geldanamycin (GA) destabilizes client proteins which ultimately lead to the onset of apoptosis. Dana Haley-Vicente, Assay Designs (an Enzo Life Sciences company). Front cover, bottom: C. elegans expressing a proteotoxic polyglutamine- expansion protein. Richard Morimoto, Northwestern University.
    [Show full text]
  • Aconitase: to Be Or Not to Be Inside Plant Glyoxysomes, That Is the Question
    biology Review Aconitase: To Be or not to Be Inside Plant Glyoxysomes, That Is the Question Luigi De Bellis 1,* , Andrea Luvisi 1 and Amedeo Alpi 2 1 Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, University of Salento, Via Prov. le Monteroni, I-73100 Lecce, Italy; [email protected] 2 Approaching Research Educational Activities (A.R.E.A.) Foundation, I-56126 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 10 June 2020; Accepted: 10 July 2020; Published: 12 July 2020 Abstract: After the discovery in 1967 of plant glyoxysomes, aconitase, one the five enzymes involved in the glyoxylate cycle, was thought to be present in the organelles, and although this was found not to be the case around 25 years ago, it is still suggested in some textbooks and recent scientific articles. Genetic research (including the study of mutants and transcriptomic analysis) is becoming increasingly important in plant biology, so metabolic pathways must be presented correctly to avoid misinterpretation and the dissemination of bad science. The focus of our study is therefore aconitase, from its first localization inside the glyoxysomes to its relocation. We also examine data concerning the role of the enzyme malate dehydrogenase in the glyoxylate cycle and data of the expression of aconitase genes in Arabidopsis and other selected higher plants. We then propose a new model concerning the interaction between glyoxysomes, mitochondria and cytosol in cotyledons or endosperm during the germination of oil-rich seeds. Keywords: aconitase; malate dehydrogenase; glyoxylate cycle; glyoxysomes; peroxisomes; β-oxidation; gluconeogenesis 1. Introduction Glyoxysomes are specialized types of plant peroxisomes containing glyoxylate cycle enzymes, which participate in the conversion of lipids to sugar during the early stages of germination in oilseeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Interdependence Between Chloroplasts and Mitochondria in the Light and the Dark
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1366 (1998) 235^255 Review Interdependence between chloroplasts and mitochondria in the light and the dark Marcel H.N. Hoefnagel a, Owen K. Atkin b, Joseph T. Wiskich a;* a Department of Botany, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia b Research School for Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia Received 21 April 1998; revised 3 June 1998; accepted 10 June 1998 ß 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Chloroplast; Chlororespiration; Excess reductant; Metabolite exchange; Mitochondrion; Photosynthesis; Respiration Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................... 236 2. Interactions between organelles depends on metabolite exchange . .................. 236 2.1. ATP exchange ..................................................... 236 2.2. Transport of reducing equivalents across membranes . ....................... 237 2.3. Exchange of carbon compounds ....................................... 238 3. Respiration in the light . ................................................. 239 3.1. Does respiration continue in the light? . .................................. 239 3.2. Substrates for the mitochondria in the light . ............................ 240 3.3. ATP supply in the light: chloroplasts versus mitochondria . .................. 240 3.4. Adenylate control of respiration in the light .
    [Show full text]