VERINT SYSTEMS INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Developing a Comprehensive Prevention and Enforcement Framework 95
92 Confronting the proceeds of crime in Southern Africa 93 References CHAPTER 5 Bond, P. 2006. Multinational capital’s responsibility for Africa’s resource extraction DEVELOPING A COMPREHENSIVE PREVENTION crisis. Open Space, 1(4), pp 12–21. AND ENFORCEMENT FRAMEWORK AGAINST Chinner, R. 2006. Plea-bargaining, guilty pleas and section 204 witnesses: A potential asset forfeiture nightmare. Legal Updater, 2. Pretoria: Asset Forfeiture MONEY LAUNDERING AND TERRORIST Unit. FINANCING IN NAMIBIA, 2004 TO 2006 ESAAMLG 2005. Strategic plan 2005–2008 [online]. Available from <www.esaamlg.org/documents_storage/STRATEGIC_PLAN_05.pdf> See also Ray Goba http://www.esaamlg.org/strategic_plan/index.php [cited 29 August 2006]. FATF 2005. Money laundering and terrorist financing typologies 2004–2005. Paris: Introduction Financial Action Task Force Secretariat. FIC 2006. Annual Report 2005–2006. Pretoria: Financial Intelligence Centre. This chapter attempts, firstly, to analyse the nature of money laundering Goredema, C. 2003. Money laundering in East and Southern Africa: An overview of activities observed during the period 2004 to 2006. Real cases are relied upon the threat. ISS paper 69. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies. to highlight the predicate crimes that generate funds that are subsequently Levi, M. 2003. Criminal asset stripping: Confiscating the proceeds of crime in laundered, the manner in which such funds are laundered and the state’s England and Wales. In A. Edwards and P. Gill, eds, Transnational Organised initiatives to counter these activities. Crime: Perspectives on Global Security. London: Routledge, pp. 212–26. Secondly, the presentation of case studies helps to distinguish between entities Manuel, T. 2001. Speech to Parliament in October during the debate on the Financial Intelligence Centre Act. -
Fidelity® Nasdaq Composite Index® Fund
Quarterly Holdings Report for Fidelity® Nasdaq Composite Index® Fund February 28, 2021 EIF-QTLY-0421 1.814098.116 Schedule of Investments February 28, 2021 (Unaudited) Showing Percentage of Net Assets Common Stocks – 99.7% Shares Value COMMUNICATION SERVICES – 16.7% Diversified Telecommunication Services – 0.2% Alaska Communication Systems Group, Inc. 34,501 $ 112,818 Anterix, Inc. (a) 7,844 331,252 ATN International, Inc. 7,220 351,470 Bandwidth, Inc. (a) (b) 12,082 1,913,306 Cogent Communications Group, Inc. (b) 25,499 1,526,115 Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. (a) 21,768 114,500 Iridium Communications, Inc. (a) 77,117 2,954,352 Liberty Global PLC: Class A (a) 112,326 2,766,028 Class B (a) 327 7,521 Class C (a) 204,417 4,967,333 Liberty Latin America Ltd.: Class A (a) 17,405 190,933 Class C (a) 105,781 1,159,360 ORBCOMM, Inc. (a) 54,925 419,078 Radius Global Infrastructure, Inc. (a) (b) 37,222 460,808 Sify Technologies Ltd. sponsored ADR (a) (b) 7,275 22,916 Vonage Holdings Corp. (a) 142,421 1,882,806 19,180,596 Entertainment – 2.5% Activision Blizzard, Inc. 429,734 41,086,868 Bilibili, Inc. ADR (a) (b) 99,200 12,496,224 Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology (a) (b) 13,117 16,659 Chicken Soup For The Soul Entertainment, Inc. (a) 2,009 51,370 Cinedigm Corp. (a) 73,305 102,627 CuriosityStream, Inc. Class A (a) 24,573 426,833 DouYu International Holdings Ltd. ADR (a) 82,330 1,180,612 Electronic Arts, Inc. -
(Pro Hac Vice) LABATON SUCHAROW LLP 140 Broadway
Case 2:14-cv-00033-JNP-BCW Document 140 Filed 08/31/16 Page 1 of 48 Jonathan Gardner (pro hac vice) Christine M. Fox (pro hac vice) Guillaume Buell (pro hac vice) LABATON SUCHAROW LLP 140 Broadway New York, New York 10005 Telephone: (212) 907-0700 Facsimile: (212) 818-0477 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Eric K. Jenkins (10783) CHRISTENSEN & JENSEN, P.C. 257 East 200 South, Suite 1100 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Telephone: (801) 323-5000 Facsimile: (801) 355-3472 [email protected] Counsel for Lead Plaintiff State-Boston Retirement System and the Proposed Class IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION IN RE NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC., Master File No. 2:14-cv-00033-JNP-BCW SECURITIES LITIGATION Hon. Jill Parrish DECLARATION OF JONATHAN This Document Related To: GARDNER IN SUPPORT OF LEAD ALL ACTIONS PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND PLAN OF ALLOCATION AND LEAD COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND PAYMENT OF EXPENSES Case 2:14-cv-00033-JNP-BCW Document 140 Filed 08/31/16 Page 2 of 48 I, JONATHAN GARDNER, declare as follows pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1746: 1. I am a member of Labaton Sucharow LLP (“Labaton Sucharow” or “Lead Counsel”), counsel for Lead Plaintiff State-Boston Retirement System (“Lead Plaintiff” or “State Boston”) and the Settlement Class.1 I have been actively involved in prosecuting and resolving this action, am familiar with its proceedings, and have personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein based upon my supervision and participation in all material aspects of the action. -
A Primer on Shareholder Litigation
Attorneys at Law A PRIMER ON SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION Securities Class Actions, Non-U.S. Jurisdiction Actions, Shareholder Derivative Actions, Mergers & Acquisitions Litigation, Appraisal Actions, and Direct Actions (Opting-Out) www.ktmc.com Disclaimer: This article is intended to provide a thorough background on various forms of shareholder litigation. However, it is not intended as a substitute for legal advice with your chosen counsel and discussions as to the merits of each particular action you may consider. • All citations are omitted, but available upon request. • All financial figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. Revised February 2017 A Primer on Shareholder Litigation Securities Class Actions, Non-U.S. Jurisdiction Actions, Shareholder Derivative Actions, Mergers & Acquisitions Litigation, Appraisal Actions, and Direct Actions (Opting-Out) Table of Contents Page I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 II. Overview of the United States Federal Securities Laws ................................................. 1 A. The Securities Act ............................................................................................................................. 1 B. The Exchange Act ............................................................................................................................. 2 C. Private Remedies Under Federal Law ............................................................................................. -
Outline of Recent SEC Enforcement Actions
Outline of Recent SEC Enforcement Actions Submitted by: 1 Joan McKown Chief Counsel Prepared by: 2 Division of Enforcement U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 1 The Securities and Exchange Commission, as a matter of policy, disclaims responsibility for any private publication or statement by any of its employees. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission or its staff. 2 Parts of this outline have been used in other publications. Table of Contents CASES INVOLVING FINANCIAL FRAUD & OTHER DISCLOSURE AND REPORTING VIOLATIONS...................................................................................................................2 SEC v. Jacob Alexander, David Kreinberg, and William F. Sorin ...................................................................... 2 SEC v. MBIA Inc........................................................................................................................................................... 3 In the Matter of City of San Diego, California ......................................................................................................... 3 SEC v. Viper Capital Management, LLC, et al. ....................................................................................................... 4 SEC v. Michael Moran, James Sievers, Martin Zaepfel, James Cannataro, John Steele, Michael Crusemann and Michael Otto .............................................................................................................................. -
Stock Option Backdating: the Scandal, the Misconception & the Legal Consequences
Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development Volume 23 Issue 1 Volume 23, Spring 2008, Issue 1 Article 7 March 2008 Stock Option Backdating: The Scandal, the Misconception & the Legal Consequences Jodell R. Nowicki Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/jcred Recommended Citation Nowicki, Jodell R. (2008) "Stock Option Backdating: The Scandal, the Misconception & the Legal Consequences," Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development: Vol. 23 : Iss. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/jcred/vol23/iss1/7 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STOCK OPTION BACKDATING: THE SCANDAL, THE MISCONCEPTION & THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES JODELL R. NOwIcKI* With the barrage of recent corporate scandals, including the well-publicized fall of Enron,' a recent closer scrutiny of corpo- rate executive practices has brought to light additional corporate malfeasance in the form of stock option backdating. 2 This paper will familiarize and clarify which corporate practices regarding backdating are legal versus those that are illegal, thereby sub- jecting companies and individuals to violations of state and fed- eral law. I. WHAT IS A STOCK OPTION AND How CAN IT BE BACKDATED TO CREATE AN ADVANTAGE? A stock option gives the recipient of the grant the right to buy a company's stock at a certain exercise or "strike" price. -
Comverse Motion to Dismiss January 10, 2007
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) MEMORANDUM OF LAW ) IN SUPPORT OF ) COMVERSE IN RE COMVERSE TECHNOLOGY, INC. ) TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S DERIVATIVE LITIGATION ) MOTION TO DISMISS FOR ) FAILURE TO MAKE A ) DEMAND ) ) Index No. 601272/2006 ) ) Justice Richard B. Lowe, III ) IAS Part 56 ) DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 1825 Eye Street NW Washington, DC 20006-5403 T: (202) 420-2200 F: (202) 420-2201 Counsel for Nominal Defendant Comverse Technology, Inc. DSMDB-2170150v11 Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i Table of Authorities. ....................................................................................................................... ii Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 Factual Background. ....................................................................................................................... 2 Argument. ....................................................................................................................................... 6 I. THE BOARD’S AND SPECIAL COMMITTEE’S ACTIONS OVERWHELMINGLY DEMONSTRATE THEIR ABILITY TO CONSIDER IMPARTIALLY A PRE-SUIT DEMAND....................................................................................................................................... 7 II. DERIVATIVE PLAINTIFFS’ ASSERTED GROUNDS FOR DEMAND FUTILITY -
03.04.17.Pdf(3237KB)
MARKETPLACE SHLOMO MAITAL THE HIGH COST OF FLIGHT Kobi Alexander’s journey from hi-tech visionary to convicted felon US DISTRICT Judge Nicholas Garaufis for a vacation in Israel. His lawyers had der’s brother-in-law Yechiam Yemini, a stared sternly at the defendant dressed in arranged with US authorities that he would Columbia University computer science brown prison garb, in the dock of a Brook- return to face indictment on July 31 for se- professor, to launch Efrat Future Technol- lyn courtroom, and said, “I really don’t curities fraud related to the backdating of ogies, the name of which later was changed understand how someone as brilliant and options for himself and some senior em- to Comverse Technology ‒ Comverse being accomplished and focused and respected as ployees from 1998 to 2001. a fusion of the words “communication” and you could be so incredibly, abjectly foolish “versatility.” to make some of the decisions you made.” HOWEVER, RATHER than face trial, he The company became a market leader in The 64-year-old defendant, Jacob “Kobi” fled with his wife and children to the desert voicemail hardware and software sold to Alexander, an Israeli hi-tech visionary and nation of Namibia, on Africa’s southwest telecom companies. It was the first Israeli founder of the once market-leading compa- coast, from where he felt he could not be company to be included in the prestigious ny Comverse, replied, “I’m truly sorry for extradited. (He fled Israel because Israel Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, and did a everything I have done wrong. -
Israeli Spy Companies
Israeli Spy Companies: Verint and Narus By Richard Sanders ism specialist and military-intelligence had stolen sensitive technology to officer who served 19 years in Turkey, manufacture artillery gun tubes, ob- n the mid-2000s, two Israeli spy Italy, Germany, and Spain. He notes that tained classified plans for a recon- companies (Narus and Verint) were Israel “always features prominently” in naissance system, and passed sensi- Icaught in the centre of a huge scan- the FBI’s annual report, “Foreign Eco- tive aerospace designs to unauthor- dal involving the wiretapping of virtu- nomic Collection and Industrial Espio- ized users. An Israeli company was ally all US phone and internet mes- nage.” Its 2005 report, he says, stated: caught monitoring a Department of sages. Their mass surveillance services “‘Israel has an active program to Defense telecommunications system were used by America’s two largest tel- gather proprietary information to obtain classified information.” ecom companies, AT&T and Verizon. within the US. These collection ac- Another ex-CIA officer who ex- (See AT&T pp.7-8, and Verizon in ta- tivities are primarily directed at ob- pressed grave concerns about Israel’s ble, “CPP Investments,” p.53.) taining information on military sys- spying is Robert David Steele. He said These telecom giants, which to- tems and advanced computing ap- “Israeli penetration of the entire US tel- gether control 80% of the US market, plications that can be used in Isra- ecommunications system means that were turning over all of their custom- el’s sizable armaments industry.’ It NSA’s warrantless wiretapping actually ers’ internet communications and phone adds that Israel recruits spies, uses means Israeli warrantless wiretapping.” call records to the US National Secu- electronic methods, and carries out Jane’s Intelligence Group re- rity Agency (NSA). -
Demand/Supply: Exposing the Surveillance Industry in Colombia
Demand/Supply: Exposing the Surveillance Industry in Colombia Demand/Supply: Exposing the Surveillance Industry in Colombia XXXXXXXXXXXX September 2015 www.privacyinternational.org Demand/Supply:ExposingDemand/Supply:Exposing the the Surveillance Surveillance Industry Industry in in Colombia Colombia Bogotá skyline from Monserrate mountain. Credit - Privacy International (2014) 4/454/44 Demand/Supply:Exposing the Surveillance Industry in Colombia Table of Contents List of Acronyms 6 Executive Summary 7 Recommendations 9 The Colombian Surveillance State 11 Selling Surveillance 17 Network Interception 22 The Companies: Network Interception 25 Tactical Surveillance 35 Conclusion 41 Annex 42 5/44 Demand/Supply:Exposing the Surveillance Industry in Colombia List of Acronyms 3G Third generation mobile telecommunications technology 4G Fourth generation mobile telecommunications technology ASFADDES Association for the Relatives of the Detained-Disappeared CALEA US Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act CCAJAR The José Alvear Restrepo Lawyers’ Collective CIA US Central Intelligence Agency DANE National Bureau of Statistics DAS Administrative Security Department DEA US Drugs Enforcement Agency DIJIN Directorate of Criminal Investigation and Interpol DIPOL Directorate of Police Intelligence E1 Telecommunications link designed to carry voice and data communications ELN National Liberation Army Esperanza Interception platform managed by Fiscalía ETSI European Telecommunications Standards Institute FARC Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of ILLINOIS in RE BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 1:19-C
Case: 1:19-cv-07786 Document #: 66 Filed: 07/06/21 Page 1 of 51 PageID #:1934 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Case No. 1:19-cv-07786 IN RE BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC. District Judge Sara L. Ellis SECURITIES LITIGATION Magistrate Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings JOINT DECLARATION OF JAMES A. HARROD AND SHARAN NIRMUL IN SUPPORT OF (I) LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND PLAN OF ALLOCATION AND (II) LEAD COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND LITIGATION EXPENSES Case: 1:19-cv-07786 Document #: 66 Filed: 07/06/21 Page 2 of 51 PageID #:1935 TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF TERMS .............................................................................................................. iii I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 II. PROSECUTION OF THE ACTION .................................................................................. 6 A. Background ................................................................................................................ 6 B. Appointment of Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel.................................................... 8 C. Lead Plaintiffs’ Investigation and Preparation and Filing of the Complaint ............. 8 D. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, the Court’s MTD Order, and Lead Plaintiffs’ Preparation of a Second Amended Complaint .......................... 9 III. MEDIATION AND SETTLEMENT .............................................................................. -
Id/Eprint/930
LBS Research Online A Mohliver How Misconduct Spreads: Auditors’ Role in the Diffusion of Stock-option Backdating Article This version is available in the LBS Research Online repository: https://lbsresearch.london.edu/ id/eprint/930/ Mohliver, A (2019) How Misconduct Spreads: Auditors’ Role in the Diffusion of Stock-option Backdating. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64 (2). pp. 310-336. ISSN 0001-8392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218763595 SAGE Publications (UK and US) http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00018... Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LBS Research Online for purposes of research and/or private study. Further distribution of the material, or use for any commercial gain, is not permitted. How Misconduct Spreads: Auditors’ Role in the Diffusion of Stock-Option Backdating Abstract This paper explores the role of professional experts in the diffusion of innovative practices that subvert the interests of stakeholders. I do so by studying the role of external auditors in the diffusion of stock-option backdating in the United States. Practices that are eventually accepted as misconduct may emerge as liminal practices, not categorized as misconduct until social control agents notice, scrutinize, and react to them. I examine how the role of external auditors in the diffusion of stock-option backdating changed as the practice shifted from liminality to being illegal and illegitimate. The findings suggest that professional experts’ involvement in the diffusion of liminal practices is highly responsive to the institutional environment. Initially, professional experts diffuse these practices via local networks. However, when the legal environment becomes more stringent, implying that the practice will become illegitimate, these offices reverse their role and extinguish the practice.