Pyrophoric Handling Procedure
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chemical Threat Agents Call Poison Control 24/7 for Treatment Information 1.800.222.1222 Blood Nerve Blister Pulmonary Metals Toxins
CHEMICAL THREAT AGENTS CALL POISON CONTROL 24/7 FOR TREATMENT INFORMATION 1.800.222.1222 BLOOD NERVE BLISTER PULMONARY METALS TOXINS SYMPTOMS SYMPTOMS SYMPTOMS SYMPTOMS SYMPTOMS SYMPTOMS • Vertigo • Diarrhea, diaphoresis • Itching • Upper respiratory tract • Cough • Shock • Tachycardia • Urination • Erythema irritation • Metallic taste • Organ failure • Tachypnea • Miosis • Yellowish blisters • Rhinitis • CNS effects • Cyanosis • Bradycardia, bronchospasm • Flu-like symptoms • Coughing • Shortness of breath • Flu-like symptoms • Emesis • Delayed eye irritation • Choking • Flu-like symptoms • Nonspecific neurological • Lacrimation • Delayed pulmonary edema • Visual disturbances symptoms • Salivation, sweating INDICATIVE LAB TESTS INDICATIVE LAB TESTS INDICATIVE LAB TEST INDICATIVE LAB TESTS INDICATIVE LAB TESTS INDICATIVE LAB TESTS • Increased anion gap • Decreased cholinesterase • Thiodiglycol present in urine • Decreased pO2 • Proteinuria None Available • Metabolic acidosis • Increased anion gap • Decreased pCO2 • Renal assessment • Narrow pO2 difference • Metabolic acidosis • Arterial blood gas between arterial and venous • Chest radiography samples DEFINITIVE TEST DEFINITIVE TEST DEFINITIVE TEST DEFINITIVE TESTS DEFINITIVE TESTS • Blood cyanide levels • Urine nerve agent • Urine blister agent No definitive tests available • Blood metals panel • Urine ricinine metabolites metabolites • Urine metals panel • Urine abrine POTENTIAL AGENTS POTENTIAL AGENTS POTENTIAL AGENTS POTENTIAL AGENTS POTENTIAL AGENTS POTENTIAL AGENTS • Hydrogen Cyanide -
Theoretical Studies of Phenylmercury Carboxylates
TA Theoretical studies of Phenylmercury 2750 carboxylates 2010 This page is intentionally left blank Theoretical studies of Phenylmercury carboxylates Complexation Constants and Gas Phase Photo- Oxidation of Phenylmercurycarboxylates. Yizhen Tang and Claus Jørgen Nielsen CTCC, Department of Chemistry, University of Oslo This page is intentionally left blank Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 1 1. Quantum chemistry studies on phenylmercurycarboxylates ..................................... 3 2. Results from quantum chemistry ................................................................................... 3 2.1 Structure of phenylmercury(II) carboxylates .............................................................. 4 2.2 Energies of complexation/dissociation ....................................................................... 9 2.3 Vertical excitation energies......................................................................................... 10 2.4 Vertical ionization energies ......................................................................................... 11 2.5 Summary of results from quantum chemistry calculations .................................... 11 3. Atmospheric fate and lifetimes of phenylmercurycarboxylates ............................... 12 3.1 Literature data............................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Estimation of the -
Stability of Dimethylmercury and Related Mercury-Containing Compounds with Respect to Selected Chemical Species Found in Aqueous Environment†
CROATICA CHEMICA ACTA CCACAA, ISSN 0011-1643, e-ISSN 1334-417X Croat. Chem. Acta 86 (4) (2013) 453–462. http://dx.doi.org/10.5562/cca2314 Original Scientific Article Stability of Dimethylmercury and Related Mercury-containing Compounds † with Respect to Selected Chemical Species Found in Aqueous Environment Laimutis Bytautas Department of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA, Present address: Galveston College, Department of Chemistry, 4015 Avenue Q, Galveston, TX, 77550, USA. (E-mail: [email protected]) RECEIVED JUNE 23, 2013; REVISED OCTOBER 3, 2013; ACCEPTED OCTOBER 4, 2013 Abstract. Dimethylmercury (CH3−Hg−CH3) and other Hg-containing compounds can be found in atmos- pheric and aqueous environments. These substances are highly toxic and pose a serious environmental and health hazard. Therefore, the understanding of chemical processes that affect the stability of these sub- stances is of great interest. The mercury-containing compounds can be detected in atmosphere, as well as soil and aqueous environments where, in addition to water molecules, numerous ionic species are abun- dant. In this study we explore the stability of several small, Hg-containing compounds with respect to wa- + ter molecules, hydronium (H3O ) ions as well as other small molecules/ions using density functional theo- ry and wave function quantum chemistry methods. It is found that the stability of such molecules, most + notably of dimethylmercury, can be strongly affected by the presence of the hydronium H3O ions. Alt- hough the present theoretical study represents gas phase results, it implies that pH level of a solution should be a major factor in determining the degree of abundance for dimethylmercury in aqueous envi- + ronment. -
October 1, 2020 Webinar
Phosphorus Specialties: the cornerstone of synthesis for pharmaceutical applications Eamonn Conrad, Ph.D., Global BD Manager Dino Amoroso, Ph.D., NA Account Manager William Stibbs, Ph.D. Senior BD Manager Overview • Solvay Phosphorus Specialties, Strem Chemicals Inc. Partnership • Chemistry for the Manufacture of Phosphine Ligands • Applications in Pharmaceutical Catalysis • Applications in Life Sciences • Summary and Questions *Solvay partners with Strem Chemicals for sample distribution page 2 Phosphorus Specialties Strem Chemicals, Inc. Solvay partners with Strem Chemicals for sample distribution! Established in 1964 More than 55 years of experience in manufacturing and handling high quality inorganics and organometallics 5,000+ specialty chemicals available Laboratory Chemicals for R&D cGMP Products Manufactured in Kilo-lab Suites High Pressure Materials Custom Synthesis Projects Customers include: Corporate Headquarters Academic, industrial and government R&D laboratories Corporate Headquarters European Headquarters Commercial scale businesses in the pharmaceutical, Newburyport, MA USA Strasbourg, France microelectronics, chemical & petrochemical industries Phosphorus Specialties Samples available from Strem Who We Are Phosphorus Specialties Mining Solutions Polymer Additives Putting our science to work for customers to develop differentiated products and technologies Dedicated on-site technical service and applications expertise to support our customers’ needs Deep customer relationships and ongoing collaborations to solve demanding -
Results of the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Study: Mercury Data Report
Results of the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Study: Mercury Data Report February 2004 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes National Program Office (G-17J) 77 West Jackson Boulevard Chicago, IL 60604 EPA 905 R-01-012 Results of the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Study: Mercury Data Report Prepared for: US EPA Great Lakes National Program Office 77 West Jackson Boulevard Chicago, Illinois 60604 Prepared by: Harry B. McCarty, Ph.D., Ken Miller, Robert N. Brent, Ph.D., and Judy Schofield DynCorp (a CSC Company) 6101 Stevenson Avenue Alexandria, Virginia 22304 and Ronald Rossmann, Ph.D. US EPA Office of Research and Development Large Lakes Research Station 9311 Groh Road Grosse Ile, Michigan 48138 February 2004 Acknowledgments This report was prepared under the direction of Glenn Warren, Project Officer, USEPA Great Lakes National Program Office; and Louis Blume, Work Assignment Manager and Quality Assurance Officer, USEPA Great Lakes National Program Office (GLNPO). The report was prepared by Harry B. McCarty, Ken Miller, Robert N. Brent, and Judy Schofield, with DynCorp’s Science and Engineering Programs, and Ronald Rossmann, USEPA Large Lakes Research Station, with significant contributions from the LMMB Principal Investigators for mercury and Molly Middlebrook, of DynCorp. GLNPO thanks these investigators and their associates for their technical support in project development and implementation. Ronald Rossmann wishes to thank Theresa Uscinowicz for assistance with collection, preparation, and analysis of the samples; special thanks to staff of the NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Great Lakes Water Institute Center for Great Lakes Studies, USEPA Great Lakes National Program, and USEPA Mid-Continent Ecology Division for collection of the samples. -
Ep 2508506 A1
(19) & (11) EP 2 508 506 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 10.10.2012 Bulletin 2012/41 C07C 67/343 (2006.01) C07C 227/08 (2006.01) C07F 5/02 (2006.01) C07C 229/34 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 11161611.6 (22) Date of filing: 08.04.2011 (84) Designated Contracting States: (72) Inventor: The designation of the inventor has not AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB yet been filed GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR (74) Representative: Kunic Tesovic, Barbara Designated Extension States: Lek Pharmaceuticals d.d. BA ME Sandoz Development Center Slovenia - Patents Verovskova 57 (71) Applicant: LEK Pharmaceuticals d.d. 1526 Ljubljana (SI) 1526 Ljubljana (SI) (54) Preparation of sitagliptin intermediates (57) The invention relates to the preparation of chiral compounds, in particular to the preparation of chiral compounds which may be used as intermediates for the preparation of anti-diabetic agents, preferably sitagliptin. EP 2 508 506 A1 Printed by Jouve, 75001 PARIS (FR) EP 2 508 506 A1 Description Field of the Intention 5 [0001] The present invention relates to the preparation of chiral compounds, in particular to the preparation of chiral compounds which may be used as intermediates for the preparation of anti-diabetic agents, preferably sitagliptin. Background prior art 10 [0002] Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a global epidemic. Therefore, the research is oriented in the development of selective inhibitors of the enzyme DPP-IV as a promising new treatment for the type II diabetes. -
Preparing Sodium Hydroxide Solutions Nov 2016
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE: Preparing sodium hydroxide solutions Note: To be undertaken only by trained personnel in conjunction with a current Safety Data Sheet (SDS) and site-specific risk assessment. ___________________ 1. Introduction Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) is a hazardous chemical and must be treated with care. It is highly corrosive to skin and eyes and extremely toxic if ingested. The solid can be purchased as pellets, flakes or mini pearls. It is very hygroscopic (absorbs water from the air) and will also absorb carbon dioxide from the air and therefore cannot be used as a primary standard for titrations. To minimise its absorption of water and carbon dioxide, it should be kept in a tightly closed container and left open for as little time as possible. Dissolving sodium hydroxide in water is an exothermic (heat producing) reaction. Synonyms: caustic soda, lye, soda lye. 2. Context These instructions are for the use of experienced teachers and technicians only. Do not make up a solution for the first time without seeking practical advice from an experienced colleague. 3. Safety Notes This activity may only be carried out with appropriate facilities available i.e. running water, chemical safety/eyewash station and relevant Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Conduct procedure in a well-ventilated area or fume cupboard. Avoid contact with skin and eyes, and avoid breathing fumes. The preparation of sodium hydroxide solutions liberates heat and may produce caustic fumes/vapours. Ensure that glassware is free from chips and cracks before use. For first aid, accident and spill procedures refer to SDS before making a solution. -
Notes from Rao 2/13/2007 2:07:37 PM
Environmental Assessment of Sediments and Water in Bayou Grande, Pensacola, FL. Dr. Carl J. Mohrherr Center for Environmental Diagnostics and Bioremediation University of West Florida Dr. Johan Liebens Department of Environmental Studies University of West Florida Dr. K. Ranga Rao Center for Environmental Diagnostics and Bioremediation University of West Florida June 26, 2008 FOREWORD This study is a component of the "Assessment of Environmental Pollution and Community Health in Northwest Florida" supported by a USEPA Cooperative Agreement award X-9745502 to The University of West Florida (Project Director: Dr. K. Ranga Rao). The contents of this report are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the USEPA. The study was undertaken because of the increasing concern for environmental pollution and potential impacts on human health in Northwest Florida. It was designed to assess environmental impacts of toxic pollutants in Bayou Grande. Kristal Flanders managed the spatial databases for the project and drafted the maps. Her assistance has been invaluable. Chris Carlton-Franco, Brandon Jarvis, Guy Allard, and Danielle Peterson helped with the fieldwork and some laboratory procedures. Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. i TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 1 II STUDY AREA............................................................................................................. -
Biosafety Level 2 Guide University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Biosafety Level 2 Guide University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Risk Assessments .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Routes of Exposure ................................................................................................................................... 3 Risk Groups and Biosafety Levels .............................................................................................................. 4 IBC Registrations ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Laboratory Audits...................................................................................................................................... 5 Risk Assessment Scenarios ........................................................................................................................ 5 Training requirements .................................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction to Biosafety .......................................................................................................................... 7 NIH Guidelines Overview ......................................................................................................................... -
Inorganic Syntheses
INORGANIC SYNTHESES Volume 27 .................... ................ Board of Directors JOHN P. FACKLER, JR. Texas A&M University BODlE E. DOUGLAS University of Pittsburgh SMITH L. HOLT, JR. Oklahoma State Uniuersity JAY H. WORRELL University of South Florida RUSSELL N. GRIMES University of Virginia ROBERT J. ANGELIC1 Iowa State University Future Volumes 28 ROBERT J. ANGELIC1 Iowa State University 29 RUSSELL N. GRIMES University of Virginia 30 LEONARD V. INTERRANTE Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 31 ALLEN H. COWLEY University of Texas, Austin 32 MARCETTA Y. DARENSBOURG Texas A&M University International Associates MARTIN A. BENNETT Australian National University, Canberra FAUSTO CALDERAZZO University of Pisa E. 0. FISCHER Technical University. Munich JACK LEWIS Cambridge University LAMBERTO MALATESTA University of Milan RENE POILBLANC University of Toulouse HERBERT W. ROESKY University of Gottingen F. G. A. STONE University of Bristol GEOFFREY WILKINSON Imperial College of Science and Technology. London AKlO YAMAMOTO Tokyo Institute 01 Technology. Yokohama Editor-in-Chief ALVIN P. GINSBERG INORGANIC SYNTHESES Volume 27 A Wiley-Interscience Publication JOHN WILEY & SONS New York Chichester Brisbane Toronto Singapore A NOTE TO THE READER This book has been electronically reproduced from digital idormation stored at John Wiley h Sons, Inc. We are phased that the use of this new technology will enable us to keep works of enduring scholarly value in print as long as there is a reasonable demand for them. The content of this book is identical to previous printings. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Copyright $? 1990 Inorganic Syntheses, Inc. All rights reserved. Published simultaneously in Canada. Reproduction or translation of any part of this work beyond that permitted by Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. -
Pyrophoric Materials
Appendix A PYROPHORIC MATERIALS Pyrophoric materials react with air, or with moisture in air. Typical reactions which occur are oxidation and hydrolysis, and the heat generated by the reactions may ignite the chemical. In some cases, these reactions liberate flammable gases which makes ignition a certainty and explosion a real possibility. Examples of pyrophoric materials are shown below. (List may not be complete) (a) Pyrophoric alkyl metals and derivatives Groups Dodecacarbonyltetracobalt Silver sulphide Dialkytzincs Dodecacarbonyltriiron Sodium disulphide Diplumbanes Hexacarbonylchromium Sodium polysulphide Trialkylaluminiums Hexacarbonylmolybdenum Sodium sulphide Trialkylbismuths Hexacarbonyltungsten Tin (II) sulphide Nonacarbonyldiiron Tin (IV) sulphide Compounds Octacarbonyldicobalt Titanium (IV) sulphide Bis-dimethylstibinyl oxide Pentacarbonyliron Uranium (IV) sulphide Bis(dimethylthallium) acetylide Tetracarbonylnickel Butyllithium (e) Pyrophoric alkyl non-metals Diethylberyllium (c) Pyrophoric metals (finely divided state) Bis-(dibutylborino) acetylene Bis-dimethylarsinyl oxide Diethylcadmium Caesium Rubidium Bis-dimethylarsinyl sulphide Diethylmagnesium Calcium Sodium Bis-trimethylsilyl oxide Diethylzinc Cerium Tantalum Dibutyl-3-methyl-3-buten-1-Yniborane Diisopropylberyllium Chromium Thorium Diethoxydimethylsilane Dimethylberyllium Cobalt Titanium Diethylmethylphosphine Dimethylbismuth chloride Hafnium Uranium Ethyldimthylphosphine Dimethylcadmium Iridium Zirconium Tetraethyldiarsine Dimethylmagnesium Iron Tetramethyldiarsine -
Download The
COORDINATION COMPOUNDS OF ALKYL GALLIUM HYDRIDES by VICTOR GRAHAM WIEBE B.Sc. (Hons.) University of British Columbia 1966 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE In The Department of Chemistry We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard The University of British Columbia June 1968 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and Study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by hits representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada - ii - Abstract Although the organo hydride derivatives of boron and aluminum are well characterized^little work has been reported on the corresponding gallium systems. The present study was initiated to determine the relative stabilities and reactivity of organo gallium hydride derivatives as compared with the stabilities and reactions of the corresponding compounds of boron and aluminum. Various preparative routes to this new class of gallium compounds have been investigated. These include the use of organo-mercury, organo-lithium and lithium hydride derivatives in reactions with gallium hydride and gallium alkyl compounds and their halogen substituted derivatives: Me3NGaH3 + HgR2 >- Me3NGaH2R + l/2Hg + 1/2H2 Me3NGaH2Cl + LiR y Me3NGaH2R + LiCl Me3NGaR2Cl + LiH • Me3NGaHR2 + LiCl A fourth preparative method involves disproportionation reactions between gallium hydride compounds and organo gallium compounds to yield the mixed organo hydride derivatives.