The Future of the Euro: the Options for Finland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Future of the Euro: the Options for Finland A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Kanniainen, Vesa Article The Future of the Euro: The Options for Finland CESifo Forum Provided in Cooperation with: Ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich Suggested Citation: Kanniainen, Vesa (2014) : The Future of the Euro: The Options for Finland, CESifo Forum, ISSN 2190-717X, ifo Institut - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München, München, Vol. 15, Iss. 3, pp. 56-64 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/166578 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Special The think tank held that the foreseen political union THE FUTURE OF THE EURO: including the banking union and fiscal union will push THE OPTIONS FOR FINLAND the eurozone towards a sort of practical federal state, referred to as the ‘weak federation’. It has also tran- spired that conflicts of interest between individual 1 VESA KANNIAINEN member states cannot be overlooked in the assessment of the future evolution of the eurozone. States facing a sovereign debt crisis demand that their problems be Introduction resolved through solidarity, while member states that have put in a better performance in looking after their The European Monetary Union (EMU) was a political public finances object to joint liability. project from the outset. The uncertainty factors in- volved were disregarded, even though many econo- The report conveyed a message to Finland’s political mists, especially in the United States, warned of the decision makers: Finland has a range of options, in- risks involved. Unfortunately, their fears have become cluding the current ‘driftwood option’, a unilateral re- a reality. The EuroThinkTank of Finland, a working turn to the Maastricht Treaty (Maastricht 2.0) with an group representing consisting of economists, experi- option to abstain from a further step towards integra- enced professionals in the financial sector and a statis- tion, and Fixit, an immediate return to the national tician, undertook to analyse the underlying reasons for currency. the economic and political crisis afflicting the eurozone and to assess the future of the euro. The group special- ly focused on the options available to Finland, a small Why the euro crisis? euro member. The think-tank members were united by a sense of disappointment with the economic develop- The reasons behind the euro crisis have been extensive- ment of the eurozone, the rhetoric nature of the policy ly discussed by economists. The book authored by the on the euro and the lack of diversity in the argumenta- EuroThinkTank of Finland reviewed those reasons, tion related to the assessment of its performance. including labour market mechanisms and the resulting current account problems. Moreover, a lot of attention The report raised the following questions: was devoted to the financial issues, i.e. excess liquidity (i) Why is the eurozone in crisis? What is the mag- created in the eurozone. The purpose of the monetary nitude of the welfare losses the crisis has led to? union was to integrate the eurozone’s financial systems, (ii) Do the political union, banking union and fiscal improve their efficiency and to create favourable condi- union represent solutions that promote democ- tions for risk diversification. This did not materialise. racy, economic efficiency and the general wel- True enough, progress was made with integration, but fare and security of the eurozone’s citizens? cross-border financing contributed to debt bubbles. As (iii) Is a full-blown federation a better option than banks with distorted balance sheets became increas- the current trend towards a weak federal state, ingly dependent on short-term borrowing instead of or are we heading for the re-adoption of nation- traditional deposits, they also became more exposed to al currencies? disruptions. Most importantly, the debt markets were (iv) What are the options available for Finland? fuelled by cheap money, for which favourable condi- tions were created by the key central banks, the ECB 1 University of Helsinki. This article is based on a book published on 7 May 2014 by the Libera Foundation. To produce the book, the included. During the euro’s lifetime, the financing base Finnish EuroThinkTank worked in the facilities of the University of Helsinki and its members were Vesa Kanniainen (Chairman), Jukka of the banking sector crumbled and its size relative to Ala-Peijari, Elina Berghäll, Markus Kantor, Heikki Koskenkylä, Pia the production capacity of the eurozone grew out of Koskenoja, Elina Lepomäki, Tuomas Malinen, Ilkka Mellin, Sami Miettinen, Peter Nyberg and Stefan Törnqvist. proportion. Large banks became oversized banks. CESifo Forum 3/2014 (September) 56 Special Figure 1 and the ECB, which gave added Growth rate of money supply (M3) and lending by impetus to the growth of debt. financial institutions in the eurozone Annual% ANNUAL change CHANGE in % 14 Several handicaps have been iden- tified in the development of the 12 Privare sector loans EMU. The most fundamental 10 one, however, is of a political na- 8 ture. The leaders in the eurozone 6 did not show strict commitment (4.5%) to the jointly designed rules of 4 M3 economic policies. The economic 2 relations between the US Federal 0 Govern ment and the states, on –2 the contrary, have been governed by a strict no-bailout policy since –4 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 1840. The Fed does not hold Source: ECB. bonds issued by the states in its portfolio. The book took the view that to understand the crea- tion of excess liquidity, a closer examination of the ECB’s monetary policy is required. In many cases lax The welfare loss of the euro countries monetary policy often underlies credit expansion. The crisis originating in the United States in 2008 can be An argument can be put forward that the eurozone traced back to lax monetary policy coupled with failed would have tumbled into difficulties even without the housing market policy and, in particular, shadow shock originating in the United States. The book pro- banking operations. There were also regulatory fail- vides a statistical assessment of the potential size of the ures in the supervision of the markets and financial cumulative welfare loss incurred by the euro members. It institutions. The ECB’s monetary policy in the 2000s, is based on the evolution of the eurozone’s GDP relative the years leading up to the euro crisis, was also lax. to the recovery of a reference economy, the United According to the chart below, the M3 money supply in States. While the statistical link between real growth in the eurozone grew by 106 percent during 2001–2008, GDP in the United States and the EMU was extremely while the average annual growth rate should have re- strong up until the end of 2007, it has broken since then. mained at 4.5 percent according to the first pillar of The assessment was made using several statistical models the Maastricht Treaty. based on one-step forecasts. In a sense, the cumulative welfare loss measures the distance by which actual GDP In the 1990s, the monetary author- has fallen behind potential GDP. The idea is that the US ities on both sides of the Atlantic Figure 2 were perhaps thinking that the stance of monetary policy with Stochastic difference equation: cumulative prediction error GDP low interest rates is sound enough 5 as the rate of inflation is under 0 control. What this view fails to - 5 take into account is the fact that the rate of inflation was down be- - 10 cause of the globalization process - 15 based on low-cost production in - 20 the developing countries.­­ Under- - 25 lying the easy accumulation of - 30 debt was the evolution of the Eu- ropean bond market. Central to - 35 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 these developments were the ar- Source: Own calculation. rangements made by Eurobanks 57 CESifo Forum 3/2014 (September) Special GDP serves as a surrogate variable Figure 3 for a larger set of phenomena af- GDP per capita growth rates in UK, USA, Sweden and Finland in fecting GDP in the eurozone.2 terms of purchasing power parity, 1860–2008 % 10.5 3 The following models were used: 10.0 9.5 – Stochastic difference equation: 9.0 the actual evolution of the eu- rozone’s GDP was explained 8.5 by its built-in delay structure 8.0 Finland Sweden and the actual evolution of the 7.5 UK US GDP. 7.0 USA – VAR model: actual real GDPs 6.5 of the eurozone and the United 1860 1875 1890 1905 1920 1935 1950 1965 1980 19952010 States in inter-depend ency. Source: Bolt and van Zandern (2013). – VARX model: eurozone’s and Finland’s GDP were explained From 1999–2008, the real rate of growth in both by US GDP in addition to the built-in delay regions was 2.3 percent.
Recommended publications
  • WM/Refinitiv Closing Spot Rates
    The WM/Refinitiv Closing Spot Rates The WM/Refinitiv Closing Exchange Rates are available on Eikon via monitor pages or RICs. To access the index page, type WMRSPOT01 and <Return> For access to the RICs, please use the following generic codes :- USDxxxFIXz=WM Use M for mid rate or omit for bid / ask rates Use USD, EUR, GBP or CHF xxx can be any of the following currencies :- Albania Lek ALL Austrian Schilling ATS Belarus Ruble BYN Belgian Franc BEF Bosnia Herzegovina Mark BAM Bulgarian Lev BGN Croatian Kuna HRK Cyprus Pound CYP Czech Koruna CZK Danish Krone DKK Estonian Kroon EEK Ecu XEU Euro EUR Finnish Markka FIM French Franc FRF Deutsche Mark DEM Greek Drachma GRD Hungarian Forint HUF Iceland Krona ISK Irish Punt IEP Italian Lira ITL Latvian Lat LVL Lithuanian Litas LTL Luxembourg Franc LUF Macedonia Denar MKD Maltese Lira MTL Moldova Leu MDL Dutch Guilder NLG Norwegian Krone NOK Polish Zloty PLN Portugese Escudo PTE Romanian Leu RON Russian Rouble RUB Slovakian Koruna SKK Slovenian Tolar SIT Spanish Peseta ESP Sterling GBP Swedish Krona SEK Swiss Franc CHF New Turkish Lira TRY Ukraine Hryvnia UAH Serbian Dinar RSD Special Drawing Rights XDR Algerian Dinar DZD Angola Kwanza AOA Bahrain Dinar BHD Botswana Pula BWP Burundi Franc BIF Central African Franc XAF Comoros Franc KMF Congo Democratic Rep. Franc CDF Cote D’Ivorie Franc XOF Egyptian Pound EGP Ethiopia Birr ETB Gambian Dalasi GMD Ghana Cedi GHS Guinea Franc GNF Israeli Shekel ILS Jordanian Dinar JOD Kenyan Schilling KES Kuwaiti Dinar KWD Lebanese Pound LBP Lesotho Loti LSL Malagasy
    [Show full text]
  • Euron Tulevaisuus EN.Indd
    Edited by Vesa Kanniainen The Future of the Euro THE OPTIONS FOR FINLAND 1 2 The Future of the Euro THE OPTIONS FOR FINLAND VESA KANNIAINEN (EDITOR) PUBLISHER: LIBERA This report is based on a book with the same title, published in Finnish in Helsinki on 7 May 2014. The book is based on the work of EuroThinkTank, a group of 12 individuals with several years of background in academia, economic research, financial markets and investment banking. The group gathered in the facilities of the University of Helsinki during autumn 2013 and spring 2014 to evaluate the future of the euro and Finland’s future as a euro member. EUROTHINKTANK MEMBERS Vesa Kanniainen Jukka Ala-Peijari Elina Berghäll Markus Kantor Heikki Koskenkylä Pia Koskenoja Elina Lepomäki Tuomas Malinen Ilkka Mellin Sami Miettinen Peter Nyberg Stefan Törnqvist Short bios of the writers can be found at the end of this report. Copyright © 2014 Libera Foundation Libera is Finnish independent and politically unaffiliated think tank that supports and advances individual liberty, free enterprise, free markets and a free society. Libera publishes a variety of materials both online and in print, does research and organises events. Libera was founded in 2011 and is a privately funded, functional and non- profit foundation. This report is available for free downloading at www.libera.fi A Libera Report April 2014 Libera Foundation Sepänkatu 9, 00150 Helsinki www.libera.fi Publisher: Libera Design: Manual Agency ISBN 978-952-280-034-3 (pdf) Content PREFACE 5 INTRODUCTION 7 1. The European Monetary Union – A Political Project 9 1.1 INTEGRATION IN EUROPE – NO MORE WAR 9 1.2 AVERSION TOWARDS FLOATING EXCHANGE RATES 10 1.3 FINLAND AND SWEDEN CHOSE DIFFERENTLY 12 1.4 THE EURO CRISIS IS NOT OVER 12 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Euro = (As of January 1, 1999)
    FOREIGN EXCHANGE QUOTATIONS Data as of December 2, 2019 Foreign exchange rates against the U.S. dollar HIGH LOW CLOSE Month/days Euro Yen Pound C$ Euro Yen Pound C$ Euro Yen Pound C$ November 1 1.1172 108.32 1.2973 1.3196 1.1128 107.89 1.2927 1.3139 1.1166 108.19 1.295 1.3142 November 4 1.1175 108.65 1.2946 1.3161 1.1125 108.18 1.2876 1.313 1.1128 108.58 1.288 1.3151 November 5 1.1140 109.24 1.2917 1.3178 1.1064 108.56 1.2859 1.3115 1.1075 109.16 1.288 1.3157 November 6 1.1093 109.18 1.2897 1.3193 1.1065 108.82 1.2844 1.3144 1.1066 108.98 1.286 1.3181 November 7 1.1092 109.49 1.2878 1.3197 1.1036 108.65 1.2795 1.316 1.105 109.28 1.282 1.3174 November 8 1.1055 109.48 1.2825 1.3237 1.1017 109.08 1.2769 1.3172 1.1018 109.26 1.277 1.3228 November 11 1.1043 109.26 1.2898 1.3235 1.1017 108.9 1.2778 1.3213 1.1033 109.05 1.286 1.3233 November 12 1.1039 109.29 1.2874 1.3258 1.1003 108.92 1.2816 1.3217 1.1009 109.01 1.285 1.3233 November 13 1.1020 109.15 1.2862 1.3268 1.0995 108.66 1.2822 1.3229 1.1007 108.82 1.285 1.3251 November 14 1.1028 108.86 1.2888 1.3271 1.0989 108.24 1.2825 1.3244 1.1022 108.42 1.288 1.3248 November 15 1.1057 108.86 1.2919 1.3252 1.1015 108.38 1.2868 1.3217 1.1051 108.80 1.290 1.3223 November 18 1.1090 109.07 1.2985 1.3235 1.1048 108.51 1.2897 1.32 1.1072 108.68 1.295 1.3206 November 19 1.1084 108.84 1.297 1.3272 1.1063 108.45 1.2911 1.3191 1.1078 108.54 1.293 1.3268 November 20 1.1081 108.74 1.2931 1.3328 1.1053 108.35 1.2888 1.3263 1.1073 108.61 1.292 1.3304 November 21 1.1097 108.7 1.297 1.3325 1.1052 108.28 1.2893 1.327
    [Show full text]
  • Finland – from a Crisis to a Successful Member of the Eu and Emu
    1 (13) FINLAND – FROM A CRISIS TO A SUCCESSFUL MEMBER OF THE EU AND EMU Remarks by Ms Sinikka Salo, Member of the Board, in the seminar at Narodowy Bank Polski, Warsaw, 21 April 2006 I am very pleased to be here and present my assessment of the past years of Finland’s membership in the EU and EMU. Thank you for the invitation! For dealing with this topic, I also need to take a look back to economic developments before the EU to be able to give a better understanding for this as- sessment. Indeed, Finland's economic performance in the decades following the Second World War has been relatively favourable. Historically and as a consequence of the losses suffered during the war, post-war Finland was clearly the poorest of the Nordic countries. From this starting point, Finland has been able to raise its standard of living close to that of the other Nordic countries and more than equal the current European average. Finland joined the EU, together with Austria and Sweden, from the beginning of 1995. In its accession negotiations Finland did not seek any opt-out from the third stage of the EMU, and the government, which was formed after general elections in March 1995, proclaimed in its programme that its goal was to prepare Finland to join the first group of countries doing so. Actually, the EMU membership had important effects on the Finnish economy already before it mate- rialized. I think this is a phenomenon seen in all countries with the prospect of joining the EMU.
    [Show full text]
  • 1998, a Brief Statistical Analysis
    CHANGES IN THE FINNISH INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT POSITION 1985 – 1998, A BRIEF STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Jorma Hilpinen Bank of Finland, Information Services Department P.O. Box 160 FIN-00101 Helsinki, Finland [email protected] Heikki Hella Bank of Finland, Information Services Department P.O. Box 160 FIN-00101 Helsinki, Finland [email protected] 1. Introduction This paper aims to describe and study by main component the fluctuations in the Finnish IIP. These components are the Balance of Payments flows by institutional sector as well as the valuation changes induced by asset prices and exchange rate movements. Large structural and institutional changes of the Finnish economy are highlighted by dividing the sample period 1985-1998 into two subperiods (1985Q1-1992Q2 and 1992Q3-1998Q2). The period before autumn 1992 can be characterised by a fixed exchange rate regime leading to continual credibility problems. A cyclical and monetary bubble ballooned in the last years of the 1980’s, bursting into a deep recession and a banking crisis. The international capital markets became increasingly volatile, but the Finland remained largely outside. In September 1992, the Finnish markka was allowed to float. The following year, the markka started to appreciate, and a few years later the stability of the exchange rate was regained. The recession and banking crisis greatly reshaped financial markets, production and institutional structures. The internationalisation of Finnish enterprises accelerated, and participation in international capital markets vastly expanded. Following membership in European Union and the EMU, the Finnish economy has been restructured to meet the new competitive conditions ushered in by the Economic and Monetary Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing 26 Second Revision
    Task Force on Economic and Monetary Union Briefing 26 Second revision Briefing prepared by the Directorate-General for Research Economic Affairs Division The opinions expressed are those of the author alone, and do not necessarily represent the view of the European Parliament. The precise way in which the exchange rates of participating national currencies are to be "irrevocably fixed" in order to create the Single Currency has still to be determined. There are two options. Luxembourg, 18th. March 1998 PE166.626/rev.2 ECU to Euro CONTENTS Introduction 3 What the Treaty says 3 Legislation on the Euro 5 When should the conversion rates into euros be fixed? 5 How to calculate the current rates of currencies in ECU 6 The methodology of conversion 7 1. The "cut-off" rate 7 2. The central rate 8 3. The average-rate 8 Possible speculation between May and December 9 TABLES Table 1: Value of the ECU in national currencies 4 Table 2: Bilateral central rates in the Exchange Rate Mechanism for ECU-DEM 6 Author: Anja Reinkensmeier Editor: Ben PATTERSON 2 PE 166.626/rev.2 ECU to Euro Introduction The Single Currency, the euro, will come into existence on the 1st January 1999. This will involve ô “...the irrevocable fixing of the exchange rates" between the participating national currencies; and ô the euro becoming "a currency in its own right", of which the participating national currencies will then be only be different subdivisions. Although coins and notes denominated in euros/cents are not due to circulate until 2002, it will be possible to use the euro for accounting, pricing, invoicing, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank of Finland's Annual Report 2020
    BANK OF FINLAND ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Release notes Bank of Finland Street address Postal address Snellmaninaukio, Helsinki PO Box 160, FI-00101 Helsinki Email Telephone [email protected] national 09 1831 [email protected] international +358 9 1831 SWIFT Fax SPFB FI HH +358 9 174 872 Regional office Vantaa Turvalaaksontie 1, Vantaa, PO Box 160, FI-00101 Helsinki, Telephone +358 9 1831 Web sites Bank of Finland Annual Report site suomenpankki.fi annualreport.suomenpankki. Bank of Finland Bulletin site bofbulletin.fi Rahamuseo rahamuseo.fi Bofit bofit.fi The art site kansakunnanomaisuutta.fi/en Drafted in accordance with Section 19 of the Act on the Bank of Finland. The figures in the Annual Report are based on data available in February 2021. ISSN 1456-5773 (web publication) Helsinki 2021 Table of contents OPERATIONS AND STRATEGY 4 BANK OF FINLAND IN A NUTSHELL 6 BANK OF FINLAND STRATEGY UPDATED IN 2020 7 DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES BETWEEN MEMBERS OF THE BOARD 12 STRONG EXPERTISE IS THE CURRENCY OF STABILITY 15 THE BANK OF FINLAND’S BUDGET FOR 2021 AND OPERATING EXPENSES 20 MANAGING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: COVID-19 HAS CUT THE BANK OF 26 FINLAND’S EMISSIONS ANNUAL REPORT 29 MONETARY POLICY 30 FINANCIAL STABILITY 67 CASH AND PAYMENTS 91 MANAGEMENT OF FINANCIAL ASSETS 116 ENGAGEMENT AND COOPERATION 138 SUSTAINABILITY AT THE BANK OF FINLAND 165 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 170 BALANCE SHEET 171 PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT 174 THE BOARD'S PROPOSAL ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF PROFIT 176 ACCOUNTING CONVENTIONS 177 NOTES ON THE BALANCE SHEET 184 NOTES ON THE PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT 211 APPENDICES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 222 NOTES ON RISK MANAGEMENT 224 AUDITOR'S REPORT 230 STATEMENT REGARDING THE AUDIT 231 ORGANISATION 234 Operations and strategy The Bank of Finland is Finland’s monetary authority and national central bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncorrected Transcript
    EURO-2011/04/14 1 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION IS THE EURO SAVED FOR GOOD? AN OVERVIEW OF THE ECONOMIC SITUATION IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD Washington, D.C. Thursday, April 14, 2011 PARTICIPANTS: Moderator: JUSTIN VAISSE Senior Fellow and Director of Research, Center on the United States and Europe The Brookings Institution Featured Speaker: OLLI REHN European Commissioner for Economic and Monetary Affairs European Union Discussant: DANIEL HAMILTON Executive Director, Center for Transatlantic Relations Johns Hopkins University, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies * * * * * ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 706 Duke Street, Suite 100 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 EURO-2011/04/14 2 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. VAISSE: Hi, everybody. My name is Justin Vaisse. I'm the director of Research for the Center on the U.S. and Europe, and it's my pleasure to welcome all of you at Brookings this morning. I'm very happy you could join us for a conversation with Olli Rehn, the EU Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs. The discussion this morning is held in the context of our partnerships with our friends at the Heinrich Böll Foundation. Together in the past few months we've been discussing the issue of the euro. We've held a number of workshops and roundtable in the euro zone situation, and we have also worked in tandem with the EU delegation here on K Street, and I would like to extend a special welcome to Ambassador Vadidel Madow, who's joining us today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Euro, the Snake and the Drachma Lawrence Goodman May 14, 2012
    CENTER FOR FINANCIAL STABILITY Dialog Insight S o l u t i o n s The Euro, the Snake and the Drachma Lawrence Goodman May 14, 2012 As time progresses and the wall of official support for Europe seems to be hitting a ceiling, other solutions must be found. It is hardly a wonder that calls for a shift in exchange rate policy are now heard more frequently and loudly. Similarly, questions surface surrounding the sustainability of the euro as a single currency, due in part to the history of the euro. The infamous "Snake in the Tunnel" in the 1970s, the European Monetary System (EMS) in the 1980s, and the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) in the 1990s all preceded the birth of the euro. These systems each provided varying degrees of currency flexibility, while simultaneously tying the nations’ exchange rate policies together. 1 Present Challenges: Looking Forward while Peering Back Recent CFS research replicated the experience of earlier European exchange rate regimes by synthetically creating individual member nations' currencies. 2 The research tracked how the individual exchange rates performed over time, whether they meaningfully lost competitiveness due to the constraint of being part of the euro, as well as contemplated implications for macro policy. 3 The conclusions were clear: • The euro can and should survive in close to its present form. • Greece and probably Portugal would benefit from exiting the euro. As our conclusions from December are more closely becoming reality with each passing day, evaluation of previous episodes of significant currency depreciation is warranted. Is Depreciation always Detrimental? With the possibility of a country exiting the euro, market participants and officials now need to assess the potential impact on financial markets and macro performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Adoption of Inflation Targets Affect Central Bank Behaviour? 'F
    Does the Adoption of Inflation Targets Affect Central Bank Behaviour? 'f ALVARO ALMEIDA and CHARLES A.E. GOODHART 1. Introduction Perhaps both the most difficult, and the most crucial, decision for a study of how those central banks which have adopted inflation targets have fared is to decide which central banks to include within the cho­ sen set. Nowadays almost all central banks make price stability their main objective. Price stability is regarded, for this policy purpose, as a low rate of inflation, 1 low enough to prevent agents consciously fac­ toring in expectations of future inflation into their price/wage setting decisions. Consequently virtually all central banks have an inflation target, though this may be unquantified and implicit rather than quantified and explicit. Our objective in this paper is not to discuss the adoption of price stability as the main objective for monetary pol­ icy, but to examine the implications of publicly announcing and mak­ ing this objective explicit and precise. An explicitly numerically quan­ tified inflation target is one feature that is common to all Inflation Targeting (IT) countries, but not unique to this group. Several non-IT D London School of Economics, Department of Economics, London (Great Britain) and Faculdade de Economia do Porto, Porto (Portugal). London School of Economics, Financial Markets Group, London (Great Brit­ ain). '"The authors wish to thank Avraham Ben-Bassat, Donald Brash, Clive Briault, Kevin Clinton, Charles Freedman, Andrew Haldane, Lars Heikensten, David Long­ worth, Ian Macfarlane, Jose Luis Malo de Molina, Michael Reddell, Murray Sherwin, Pierre Siklos, Antii Suvanto, Guido Tabellini and Jose Vifials for helpful comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex a to the 1998 Fx and Currency Option Definitions
    ANNEX A to the 1998 FX and Currency Option Definitions ISDAÒ INTERNATIONAL SWAPS AND DERIVATIVES ASSOCIATION, INC. EMTA® EMERGING MARKETS TRADERS ASSOCIATION THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE COMMITTEE Copyright © 1998 by INTERNATIONAL SWAPS AND DERIVATIVES ASSOCIATION, INC. EMERGING MARKETS TRADERS ASSOCIATION THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE COMMITTEE ISDA, EMTA and The Foreign Exchange Committee consent to the use and photocopying of this document for the preparation of agreements with respect to derivative transactions. ISDA, EMTA and The Foreign Exchange Committee do not, however, consent to the reproduction of this document for purposes of public distribution or sale. To obtain written permission for any use of this document (other than for the preparation of agreements with respect to derivative transactions), please contact: INTERNATIONAL SWAPS AND DERIVATIVES ASSOCIATION, INC. 600 Fifth Avenue, 27th Floor Rockefeller Center New York, N.Y. 10020-2302 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION TO ANNEX A TO THE 1998 FX AND CURRENCY OPTION DEFINITIONS ................................................... i ANNEX A CALCULATION OF RATES FOR CERTAIN SETTLEMENT RATE OPTIONS SECTION 4.3. Currencies .................................................. 1 SECTION 4.4. Principal Financial Center .......................... 10 SECTION 4.5. Settlement Rate Options ............................. 15 SECTION 4.6. Certain Definitions Relating to Settlement Rate Options ........................ 37 SECTION 4.7. Corrections to Published and Displayed Rates...................................... 39 INDEX OF TERMS .................................................................... 41 ANNEX A March 1998 INTRODUCTION TO ANNEX A TO THE 1998 FX AND CURRENCY OPTION DEFINITIONS Annex A to the 1998 FX and Currency Option Definitions ("Annex A") is intended for use in conjunction with the 1998 FX and Currency Option Definitions (the "Definitions") in confirmations of individual transactions governed by (i) the 1992 ISDA Master Agreements published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Tapio Korhonen: Finnish Monetary and Foreign Exchange Policy And
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Korhonen, Tapio Working Paper Finnish monetary and foreign exchange policy and the changeover to the euro Bank of Finland Discussion Papers, No. 25/2001 Provided in Cooperation with: Bank of Finland, Helsinki Suggested Citation: Korhonen, Tapio (2001) : Finnish monetary and foreign exchange policy and the changeover to the euro, Bank of Finland Discussion Papers, No. 25/2001, ISBN 951-686-757-X, Bank of Finland, Helsinki, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:NBN:fi:bof-20140807313 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/211903 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die
    [Show full text]