Reassessment of the Ireland V. the United Kingdom Ecthr Case: a Lost Opportunity to Clarify the Distinction Between Torture and Ill-Treatment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reassessment of the Ireland V. the United Kingdom Ecthr Case: a Lost Opportunity to Clarify the Distinction Between Torture and Ill-Treatment 56 SPECIAL SECTION: FORENSIC DOCUMENTATION OF TORTURE: REFLECTIONS AND LEARNINGS ON THE ISTANBUL PROTOCOL Reassessment of the Ireland v. the United Kingdom ECtHR case: A lost opportunity to clarify the distinction between torture and ill-treatment Vesna Stefanovska, PhD* torture, did not exist at that time. Although Key points of interest a re-opening of the case was requested in •• The European Court of Human 2014 by Ireland, forensic documentation Rights’ (ECtHR) decision on the using the Istanbul Protocol was not used; Ireland v. the United Kingdom in 2018, the ECtHR decided against re- case in 1978 based its judgment opening the case. Objective: By using the on the severity of the treatment Ireland v. The United Kingdom case, this without considering the long-term paper aims to map the origins of the five psychological effects of the five techniques, review whether applying them (torture) techniques. constitutes torture, analyze the information •• The decision of the ECtHR, in about the claimants available 30 years 2018, not to reassess their original later, and explore the ramifications of the judgement, based on the Istanbul ECtHR decision not to revise its judgment. Protocol and by considering the Methodology: Relevant texts were gathered long-term or permanent damage from the HUDOC database, Cambridge to the victims, may have adverse University Press, Wiley Online Library, repercussions for future cases. SCOPUS and MEDLINE /PubMed, and the Library of the ECtHR in Strasbourg. Abstract Discussion/conclusions: The five techniques, Introduction: In the 1978 Ireland v. the elaborated upon in the case of Ireland United Kingdom case, the European v. the United Kingdom, were used well Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) did not before the incidents in Northern Ireland consider that the so called “five techniques” in 1971 and there is evidence that United did not cause enough severity of suffering Kingdom officials have, subsequently, used to be considered torture. The intentionality the techniques. Furthermore, there is clear criterion, outlined in the Convention evidence that the “Hooded Men” had against Torture’s definition of torture, was cognitive, psychological and neurovegetative also not fully considered. The Istanbul symptoms as a result of the five techniques, Protocol, which is critical for evidencing which had long-term effects. The ECtHR did not take this into consideration when it decided not to re-open the case and the full *) Legal Researcher, Institute for Human Rights, implications of this decision for future cases Republic of North Macedonia and victims remain to be seen. TORTURE Volume 29, Number 1, 2019 Volume TORTURE Correspondence to: [email protected] https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v29i1.110000 International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims. All rights reserved. 57 SPECIAL SECTION: FORENSIC DOCUMENTATION OF TORTURE: REFLECTIONS AND LEARNINGS ON THE ISTANBUL PROTOCOL Keywords: Torture, inhuman treatment, They judged that ill-treatment must attain five techniques, psychological torture, a minimum level of severity to fall within interrogation the scope of Article 3 (Padeanu, 2018). The assessment of severity is relative and Introduction depends on all the circumstances of the Article 3 of the European Convention on case, such as the duration of the treatment, Human Rights (ECHR) enshrines one of its physical or mental effects and, in some the most fundamental values of democratic cases, the sex, age and state of health of the societies, stating that: “No one shall be victim (ECtHR, 1978: Ireland v. the United subjected to torture or to inhuman or Kingdom, §162). degrading treatment or punishment.” As Several years after this judgment, the one of the most difficult norms to interpret, 1984 Convention against Torture (UNCAT) the European Commission of Human put forward a definition of torture in which Rights (EcommHR; the Commission) and both physical and mental suffering can the European Court of Human Rights constitute torture on the condition that they (ECtHR; the Court) have faced a number are purposefully inflicted. Intentionality is of disagreements regarding what practices thus a critical criterion of torture; severe pain constitute torture. The Ireland v. the United or suffering, whether physical or mental, must Kingdom case provides a particularly be intentionally inflicted on a person. Indeed, illustrative case of this. Pérez-Sales (2017) argues that intention and In 1971, the Irish Government brought purpose go hand-in-hand; when a purpose an application to the ECommHR on can be identified, so too can intentionality. behalf of 14 “Hooded Men,” who were Purpose is, however, challenging to infer subjected to five harsh interrogation without proof of intentionality. techniques by the UK government during As evidenced by the Ireland case and “the Troubles”—a conflict regarding the others, initially, no precedent existed for constitutional status of Northern Ireland.1 the ECtHR using intention to infer torture; These techniques comprised: hooding, however, a number of cases have forced wall-standing in stress positions for long the ECtHR to reconsider its position in periods of time, noise, sleep deprivation, this regard. For example, if we analyze and food and water deprivation. After the the Strasbourg jurisprudence with the Commission unanimously decided that the intentionality criterion, Aksoy v. Turkey is an “five techniques” were in breach of Article informative case. The Court noted, “…this 3 of the European Convention on Human treatment could only have been deliberately TORTURE Rights (ECHR), it was referred to the inflicted...” and found that a certain ECtHR. In 1978, the ECtHR judged that amount of preparation and exertion would Volume 29, Number 1, 2019 Volume the practices used amounted to “inhuman have been required to carry it out (Reidy, and degrading treatment” but not torture. 2002, p.13). This was in relation to the so- called “Palestinian hanging” case, where the victim was suspended by his arms, which were tied behind his back (ECtHR, 1996: 1 Hooded Men is a term often used when referring Aksoy v. Turkey). to this group of 14 men in academic publications Despite this, in 2018, the ECtHR and news stories because hoods were placed on them while they were interrogated. rejected Ireland’s request—made in 2014— 58 SPECIAL SECTION: FORENSIC DOCUMENTATION OF TORTURE: REFLECTIONS AND LEARNINGS ON THE ISTANBUL PROTOCOL to revise the original decision relating to the The documents were reviewed and Hooded Men, which was made on the basis analyzed through two approaches. Firstly, of new evidence. This was a lost opportunity the sources were read thoroughly and to clarify the conceptual distinction between annotated to develop themes and gain a torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading clearer picture of psychological torture. treatment (CIDT), particularly in relation to Secondly, historical methods were psychological torture. used for gathering facts pertaining to After briefly detailing the methodology different decades and continents, with the used, this paper proceeds as follows: purpose of showing that the five (torture) demarcates psychological torture and maps techniques were applied well before the the historical origins and application of the incidents in Northern Ireland and that five techniques, which led to psychological they continued to be used after, although torture; details the interpretation of the they were considered to be illegal. Based five techniques in the original Ireland v. on this literature, comparable cases The United Kingdom case; reviews the were also sought to form comparisons implications of the recent decision by the between the case in question and other ECtHR not to revise its judgment; discusses cases from the Strasbourg and Inter- other disagreements between these two American case law. The purpose was to institutions; explores the jurisprudence of show that now the ECtHR has clarified the use of the five techniques documented in that the assessment of the minimum level other cases globally regarding psychological of severity is relative and depends on the torture; and concludes. circumstances of the case. Methodology Demarcating psychological torture The data that informed this paper Both physical and psychological torture consisted of books, articles, newspaper produce physical and mental suffering, searches, and cases. Some of the sources which makes distinguishing between them were collected during a research visit to the challenging. “Psychological torture” can ECtHR in Strasbourg. Other sources were relate to two different aspects of the same found using the Cambridge University entity. On the one hand, it can consist Press database. Databases such as Wiley of non-physical methods as “physical Online Library, SCOPUS and MEDLINE methods” of torture are often self-evident, /PubMed were also used to locate articles such as thumbscrews, flogging, application in relation to the Ireland v. The United of electric current to the body, and other Kingdom case, psychological torture, and similar techniques. On the other hand, the long-term effects of the five (torture) physical methods can also cause mental techniques. Court cases were found using suffering. In this context, “non-physical” the HUDOC database and the IACtHR. refers to a method that does not hurt, maim In total, 54 sources were identified, of or even touch the body, but touches the which 37 were deemed relevant and used mind instead (Reyes, 2007). Practices that in this research.
Recommended publications
  • Identity, Authority and Myth-Making: Politically-Motivated Prisoners and the Use of Music During the Northern Irish Conflict, 1962 - 2000
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queen Mary Research Online Identity, authority and myth-making: Politically-motivated prisoners and the use of music during the Northern Irish conflict, 1962 - 2000 Claire Alexandra Green Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 I, Claire Alexandra Green, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged below and my contribution indicated. Previously published material is also acknowledged below. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other Intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the College has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of the thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. Signature: Date: 29/04/19 Details of collaboration and publications: ‘It’s All Over: Romantic Relationships, Endurance and Loyalty in the Songs of Northern Irish Politically-Motivated Prisoners’, Estudios Irlandeses, 14, 70-82. 2 Abstract. In this study I examine the use of music by and in relation to politically-motivated prisoners in Northern Ireland, from the mid-1960s until 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Survival in Solitary
    SURVIVAL IN SOLITARY A manual written by & for people living in control units This manual is published by American Friends Service Cimmittee In November, 1997. It may be freely reproduced. Dedicated to those who have contributed to this manual & to all courageous people living in prison The federal penitentiary in Marion, Illinois, went on permanent lock down in 1983. This created the first “control unit”. Now, in addition to the federal government, some forty states have built these “maxi-maxi” prisons — representations of the angry and cruel repression that grips our country today. Human beings are put alone in a small cell with double steel doors and no window for 23 hours a day. No program, no work, no education, meals alone, and maybe one hour by oneself in a bare dog-run outside. A religious task force calls such conditions psychological pain and agony tantamount to torture. It is torture. Here, now, in the following pages, people who are captives in these cells write about what goes on and how you can survive… TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Letters from Prisoners – Life in a control unit 3 II. Letters from Prisoners - Survival 8 III. Past Times 27 IV. The Community Outside 30 V. Acknowledgments 37 I. LETTERS FROM PRISONERS – LIFE IN A CONTROL UNIT Sensory Deprivation is Depravity From within and beyond the one hundred thousand dollar 8 by 14 sq. ft. steel and stone Sensory Deprivation cell that is designed for my mental, physical, and social de- humanization, I bring to you this letter of concern regarding the adverse effects of long- term Sensory Deprivation.
    [Show full text]
  • S444-CAJ-Submission-To-ICCPR
    CAJ’s Submission no. S444 CAJ’s Submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee on the UK’s 7th Periodic Report under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) June 2015 2nd Floor, Sturgen Building Tel – 028 9031 6000 9-15 Queen Street Email – [email protected] Belfast BT1 6EA Web – www.caj.org.uk About CAJ The Committee on the Administration of Justice (CAJ) was established in 1981 and is an independent non-governmental organisation affiliated to the International Federation of Human Rights. CAJ takes no position on the constitutional status of Northern Ireland and is firmly opposed to the use of violence for political ends. Its membership is drawn from across the community. The Committee seeks to ensure the highest standards in the administration of justice in Northern Ireland by ensuring that the government complies with its responsibilities in international human rights law. The CAJ works closely with other domestic and international human rights groups such as Amnesty International, Human Rights First (formerly the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights) and Human Rights Watch and makes regular submissions to a number of United Nations and European bodies established to protect human rights. CAJ’s activities include - publishing reports, conducting research, holding conferences, campaigning locally and internationally, individual casework and providing legal advice. Its areas of work are extensive and include policing, emergency laws and the criminal justice system, equality and advocacy for a Bill of Rights. CAJ however would not be in a position to do any of this work, without the financial help of its funders, individual donors and charitable trusts (since CAJ does not take government funding).
    [Show full text]
  • Catching Terrorists: the British System Versus the U.S
    S. HRG. 109–701 CATCHING TERRORISTS: THE BRITISH SYSTEM VERSUS THE U.S. SYSTEM HEARING BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SPECIAL HEARING SEPTEMBER 14, 2006—WASHINGTON, DC Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 30–707 PDF WASHINGTON : 2006 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi, Chairman TED STEVENS, Alaska ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri TOM HARKIN, Iowa MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland CONRAD BURNS, Montana HARRY REID, Nevada RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama HERB KOHL, Wisconsin JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire PATTY MURRAY, Washington ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota LARRY CRAIG, Idaho DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois MIKE DEWINE, Ohio TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana WAYNE ALLARD, Colorado BRUCE EVANS, Staff Director TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire, Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia TED STEVENS, Alaska DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico BARBARA A.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume I Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons Dated 15 June 2010 for The
    Report of the Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons dated 15 June 2010 for the Report of the Bloody Sunday Inquiry The Rt Hon The Lord Saville of Newdigate (Chairman) Bloody Sunday Inquiry – Volume I Bloody Sunday Inquiry – Volume The Hon William Hoyt OC The Hon John Toohey AC Volume I Outline Table of Contents General Introduction Glossary Principal Conclusions and Overall Assessment Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online The Background to Bloody www.tsoshop.co.uk Mail, Telephone, Fax & E-mail Sunday TSO PO Box 29, Norwich NR3 1GN Telephone orders/General enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-Call: 0845 7 023474 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 E-mail: [email protected] Textphone: 0870 240 3701 The Parliamentary Bookshop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square, London SW1A 2JX This volume is accompanied by a DVD containing the full Telephone orders/General enquiries: 020 7219 3890 Fax orders: 020 7219 3866 text of the report Email: [email protected] Internet: www.bookshop.parliament.uk TSO@Blackwell and other Accredited Agents Customers can also order publications from £572.00 TSO Ireland 10 volumes 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD not sold Telephone: 028 9023 8451 Fax: 028 9023 5401 HC29-I separately Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons dated 15 June 2010 for the Report of the Bloody Sunday Inquiry The Rt Hon The Lord Saville of Newdigate (Chairman) The Hon William Hoyt OC The Hon John Toohey AC Ordered by the House of Commons
    [Show full text]
  • THE APPARATUS of IMPUNITY? Human Rights Violations and the Northern Ireland Conflict: a Narrative of Official Limitations on Post-Agreement Investigative Mechanisms
    THE APPARATUS OF IMPUNITY? Human rights violations and the Northern Ireland conflict: a narrative of official limitations on post-Agreement investigative mechanisms Committee on the Administration of Justice January 2015 The Apparatus of Impunity? Committee on the Administration of Justice (CAJ) © Committee on the Administration of Justice January 2015 The material may be reproduced, free of charge, in any format or medium without specific permission, provided the reproduction is not for financial or material gain.The material must be reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. If the material is to be republished or issued to others, acknowledgement must be given to its source, copyright status, and date of publication. This publication is available on our website. CAJ Committee on the Administration of Justice 2nd Floor, Sturgen Building 9-15 Queen Street Belfast BT1 6EA Tel: 028 9031 6000 Fax: 028 9031 4583 [email protected] www.caj.org.uk ISBN 978 1 873285 94 7 The Apparatus of Impunity? Committee on the Administration of Justice (CAJ) THE APPARATUS OF IMPUNITY? Human rights violations and the Northern Ireland conflict: a narrative of official limitations on post-Agreement investigative mechanisms Committee on the Administration of Justice January 2015 The Apparatus of Impunity? Committee on the Administration of Justice (CAJ) Recent comments from key Council of Europe and UN human rights bodies in relation to existing mechanisms investigating the conflict in Northern Ireland: The absence of any plausible explanation for the failure to collect key evidence at the time when this was possible, and for attempts to even obstruct this process, should be treated with particular vigilance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Perilous Dialogue
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2009 The Perilous Dialogue Laura K. Donohue Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] Georgetown Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 12-028 This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/787 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2020353 97 Cal. L. Rev. 357-392 (2009) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, National Security Law Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons DONOHUE FINAL.DOC 4/30/2009 11:11:35 PM The Perilous Dialogue Laura K. Donohue† Five months before his retirement, Justice William Brennan wrote in a dissent: “the Framers of the Bill of Rights did not purport to ‘create’ rights. Rather, they designed the Bill of Rights to prohibit our Government from infringing rights and liberties presumed to be pre-existing.”1 Professor Stephen Holmes reminds us in his lecture that such rights and liberties do not impede progress: they embody it.2 The rules preserving rights and liberties can help to focus action by bringing clarity to the present, while still preserving a long- term political perspective. Yet, time and again, both these rights and the rules designed to protect them are sacrificed in the name of national security. The master metaphor in each sacrifice is, indeed, “security or freedom,” and it is on this metaphor that I would like to focus.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Conceptual and Evidentiary Dimensions of Psychological Torture1
    15 REVIEW Debility, dependency and dread: On the conceptual and evidentiary dimensions of psychological torture1 Ergun Cakal, LLM* its perpetrators. A review of the current Key points of interest: literature to map conceptual and evidentiary •• Psychological torture is prohibited shortcomings from an inter-disciplinary by international law, but is ill- perspective is therefore warranted. Method: defined and regularly interpreted as The relevant texts were identified through not amounting to torture. Mental a systematic full-text search of databases, suffering needs to be clarified namely HeinOnline, HUDOC, UNODS and and expanded upon as part of the DIGNITY´s Documentation Centre, with definition of torture. the keywords `psychological torture´, `mental •• Psychological torture is complex and pain and suffering´, `severity´, `humiliation´, lacks appropriate acknowledgement `interrogation techniques´, and `torture in evidence-based fora. methods´. The identified texts, limited to English-language journal articles, NGO Abstract: reports, court-cases and UN documents Background: Psychological torture is from 1950 to date, were then selected deployed to break and obliterate human for relevance pertaining to conceptual, resistance, spirit and personality, but it evidentiary, technological and ethical critique is rarely afforded sufficient attention. provided therein. Results/Discussion: Deficiencies in conceptualising, documenting Evidential invisibility, subjectivity of the and adjudicating non-physical torture suffering, and perceived technological mean that it is frequently left undetected control are the primary ways in which and uncontested by the public, media psychological torture methods are designed, and the courts, bolstering impunity for and how they manage to evade prosecution 28, Number 2, 2018 Volume TORTURE and consequently be perpetuated. Cognisant of the need for further research, pertinent questions highlighting the need *) Legal Advisor, DIGNITY - Danish Institute to develop approaches, sharpen standards Against Torture.
    [Show full text]
  • Near-Death Experiences: Evidence for Survival? 1
    Near-Death Experiences: Evidence for Survival? 1 V. Krishnan Tamilnad, India ABSTRACT This paper argues that the out-of-body experience (OBE) and other elements of a near-death experience (NDE), as well as the positive affects that accompany them, do not yield conclusive evidence for survival after death. The OBE has features that suggest a physical basis for it, the other elements show the influ ence of cultural background, and positive affects may simply occur to conserve one's energy and prolong life. Other explanations for near-death elements, such as sensory deprivation, extrasensory perception, and eyeless sight, are addressed. INTRODUCTION Various interpretations have been offered for near-death experi ences (NDEs) (see Drab [1981] for a brief account). I am concerned here with the view that they hint at survival after death. As I have said elsewhere in a rather piecemeal fashion, I doubt whether.such a claim can be made on the basis of the experiences currently cited in support of it (Krishnan, 1978, 1981, 1982). In fact, some of them seem to me to be biological mechanisms that help the experiencer survive. However, I do not hold the view that it is fruitless to look for survival evidence in NDEs or other phenomena. Indeed, there are good reasons for not closing the issue. Before examining the survivalists' use of the NDE as evidence, let me recall here briefly the NDE's most common elements: an over whelming feeling of peace and well-being (which serves as an affective background for other experiences, if there are any); an out-of-body experience (OBE); a sensation of floating through darkness or a passage described as a tunnel, etc.; meeting spirits, dead relatives, and religious figures; an encounter with a presence or a brilliant light; a feeling of being in a realm of ethereal beauty; a life review; and a sense of reaching a limit beyond which the experiencer feels that he or she should not go.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature and Function of the Hypnagogic State Thesis Submitted
    HYPNAGOGIA The Nature and Function of the Hypnagogic State by Andreas Mavromatis Thesis submitted to the Department of Psychology, Brunel University, for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 1983 V01-1 PIS 4: r.:: ; D Eiz. -D Dream caused by the flight of a bee around a pomegranate one second before waking up 1944 Oil()" canvas. ;1x 41 Thyssen-Bornemis_a Collection. Lugano SalvadorDeli -' i 1 y1 \i ý;,, ý. ý,ý, 4' l ! ,,.: . >" ý -d Rupp- a All 4ý Vic All CONTENTS Abstract 3 Acknowledgements 5 Preface 6 - PART ONE - PHENOMENOLOGY 1. Introduction 8 2. Historical background and incidence 12 3. Methods and procedures of investigation 19 4. Sensori-motor phenomena and systems of classification 25 5. Physiological correlates 64 6" Problems of definition and the stages of the hypnagogic state 73 7. Cognitive-affective characteristics 83 Summary and Conclusions of Part One 131 - PART TWO - HYPNAGOGIA AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER STATES, PROCESSES, AND EXPERIENCES Introduction 137 Be Hypnosis 139 9. Dreams 150 10. Meditation 183 11. Psi 212 12. Schizophrenia 265 13. Creativity 310 14. Other areas of experience 374 Summary and Conclusions of Part Two 388 - PART THREE - GRAIN MECHANISMS AND FUNCTION OF HYPNAGOGIA Introduction 394 15. Cerebral correlates of hypnagogic visions 395 16. Cerebral correlates of hypnagogic mentation 420 17. The old versus the new brain 434 18. The loosening of ego boundaries 460 19. The function of hypnagogia 474 20. The significance of hypnagogia 492 Appendix 510 Bibliography 519 ANDREAS MAVROMATIS Ph. D. Psychology, Brunel University, 1983. - HYPNAGOGIA - The Nature and Function of the Hypnagogic State ABSTRACT An analysis of the hypnagogic state (hypnagogia) leads to the conclusion that, far from being a simple phase of sleep, this state or process is a central phenomenon characterized by a constellation of psychological features which emerge as a function of the hypnagogic subject's loosening of ego boundaries (LEB) and are correlated with activities of subcortical structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconsidering the Troubles: an Examination of Paramilitary and State Violence in Northern Ireland
    Reconsidering the Troubles: An examination of paramilitary and state violence in Northern Ireland Erica Donaghy 2017 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of International and Global Studies (Honours) in History, University of Sydney. 1 Abstract In the bitter sectarian conflict of the Northern Ireland Troubles, which spanned the years 1966- 1998, culpability has usually been firmly placed in the actions of the Irish Republican Army, a group seeking reunification with the Republic of Ireland. This thesis argues that the roles of Protestant loyalist paramilitaries and state forces such as the British Army and Royal Ulster Constabulary were equally as important. That this importance is not demonstrated in dominant literature remains to be to the detriment of efforts towards reconciliation and the acceptance of shared responsibility, and perpetuates the sectarian divide between Protestant and Catholic communities. 2 Contents Introduction 4 Chapter One: Republicanism and the IRA 11 Chapter Two: Unionism, loyalism and pro-state violence 31 Chapter Three: State Security Forces: the RUC and the British Army 54 Conclusion 71 Bibliography 75 3 Introduction Throughout the Northern Ireland Troubles, and especially in recent historical scholarship on the events of the conflict, primary culpability and the majority of focus has been given to the actions of republican groups and in particular the Irish Republican Army (in Gaelic Óglaigh na hÉireann). In popular memory and collective understanding outside of Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland this group exists as a singular entity, responsible for some of Western Europe’s most bloody, destructive and expensive acts of sectarian terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Time and Consciousness
    8 Time and Consciousness R. A. BLOCK Department of Psychology, Montana State University Introduction: Approaches to Time and Consciousness Consciousness is permeated by a succession of temporally-defined events and temporal relationships between events. Stated somewhat differently, "the nature of experience itself is far more involved with time than anything else" (Orme, 1969, p. 2). For this reason, it is not surprising that theoretical and empirical work on time and conscious­ ness was done by some of the first psychologists in the late 1000s and that the topic is currently receiving increasing interest. Most psychological studies of consciousness were conducted either before 1920 or after 1960 (Ornstein, 1977), but the annual number of psychological studies of time shows a fairly continuous acceleration (Zelkind and Sprug, 1974). Notable psychological attempts to relate time and consciousness include those by James (1890), Boring (1933/1963), Schaltenbrand (1967) and Ornstein (1969,1977). This chapter presents a selective review of relationships between consciousness and several related kinds oftemporal experience, such as simultaneity and successiveness, short temporal experiences, longer temporal experiences and temporal perspective (cf. Ornstein, 1969). The emphases are on empirical evidence and theories based on such evidence. The review includes a consideration of temporal experience in both "ordinary" waking consciousness and several categories of t, altered states ofconsciousness. There are many possible approaches to the study of time and consciousness, but this review assu mes a cogni­ t tive, or information processing, approach. Cognitive approaches to ~ temporal experience have been promoted by James (1890), Boring (1933/1963), Frankenhaeuser (1959), Fraisse (1963), Ornstein (1969), Michon (1972) and many others.
    [Show full text]