Loss of Uracil DNA Glycosylase Selectively Resensitizes P53-Mutant and -Deficient Cells to 5-Fdu Yan Yan1, Yulan Qing2, John J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Loss of Uracil DNA Glycosylase Selectively Resensitizes P53-Mutant and -Deficient Cells to 5-Fdu Yan Yan1, Yulan Qing2, John J Published OnlineFirst November 8, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0215 Cell Death and Survival Molecular Cancer Research Loss of Uracil DNA Glycosylase Selectively Resensitizes p53-Mutant and -Deficient Cells to 5-FdU Yan Yan1, Yulan Qing2, John J. Pink2, and Stanton L. Gerson2 Abstract Thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitors including fluoropyri- significantly sensitizes p53 KO cells.Thissensitizationcanalso midines [e.g., 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and 5-Fluorodeoxyuridine be recapitulated by UDG depletion in cells with p53 KD by (5-FdU, floxuridine)] and antifolates (e.g., pemetrexed) are shRNAs. In addition, sensitization is also observed with peme- widely used against solid tumors. Previously, we reported that trexed in p53 KO cells, but not with 5-FU, most likely due to shRNA-mediated knockdown (KD) of uracil DNA glycosylase RNA incorporation. Importantly, in p53 WT cells, the apoptosis (UDG) sensitized cancer cells to 5-FdU. Because p53 has also pathway induced by 5-FdU is activated independent of UDG been shown as a critical determinant of the sensitivity to TS status. However, in p53 KO cells, apoptosis is compromised in inhibitors, we further interrogated 5-FdU cytotoxicity after UDG-expressing cells, but dramatically elevated in UDG- UDG depletion with regard to p53 status. By analyzing a panel depleted cells. Collectively, these results provide evidence that of human cancer cells with known p53 status, it was deter- loss of UDG catalyzes significant cell death signals only in mined that p53-mutated or -deficient cells are highly resistant cancer cells mutant or deficient in p53. to 5-FdU. UDG depletion resensitizes 5-FdU in p53-mutant and -deficient cells, whereas p53 wild-type (WT) cells are not Implications: This study reveals that UDG depletion restores affected under similar conditions. Utilizing paired HCT116 p53 sensitivity to TS inhibitors and has chemotherapeutic potential WT and p53 knockout (KO) cells, it was shown that loss of p53 in the context of mutant or deficient p53. Mol Cancer Res; 16(2); improves cell survival after 5-FdU, and UDG depletion only 212–21. Ó2017 AACR. Introduction Fluoropyrimidines are widely used in the treatment of various types of malignancies for their broad antitumor activity. Once Thymidylate synthase (TS) is a key enzyme that catalyzes the taken into cells, fluoropyrimidines can be metabolized into fluor- only means for de novo synthesis of deoxythymidine monopho- odeoxyuridine monophosphate (FdUMP) and fluorodeoxyuri- sphate (dTMP; ref. 1). TS utilizes 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate dine triphosphate (FdUTP; refs. 2–5). The metabolite FdUMP (5,10-CH THF) as the methyl-group donor and catalyzes the 2 inhibits TS by forming a stable ternary complex with TS and reductive methylation of deoxyuridine monophosphate (dUMP) CH THF (6–8), which ultimately leads to the depletion of dTTP to dTMP (1). dTMP is subsequently phosphorylated to deoxythy- 2 and accumulation of deoxyuridine triphosphate (dUTP). The midine triphosphate (dTTP), a critical precursor for DNA repli- resulting imbalance of deoxynucleotide pools favors the utiliza- cation and repair. As TS contains binding sites for the substrate tion of dUTP and FdUTP during DNA replication and leads to the nucleotide (dUMP) and the cofactor folate (5,10-CH THF), two 2 accumulationofbothuraciland5-FUinDNA (2–5).Multitargeted structurally different classes of inhibitors, nucleotide, or folate antifolates such as pemetrexed have been approved as compo- analogs block the activity of TS (2). The class of fluoropyrimidines nents of first-line therapy in combination with cisplatin for the including 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and floxuridine (5-FdU) target treatment of advanced non–small cell lung cancer (9). Pemetrexed the nucleotide-binding site, whereas the antifolates such as peme- inhibits several folate-dependent enzymes; however, TS is its trexed target the folate-binding site of TS. predominant target (10–13). Administration of pemetrexed leads to a global reduction in nucleotide synthesis as well as accumu- lation of dUTP (14). As a result, dUTP is used in DNA synthesis in place of dTTP, generating uracil misincorporation into DNA (15). 1Department of Pharmacology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, 2 Misincorporated uracil and 5-FU are both primarily recognized Ohio. Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of General Medical and repaired by the uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG)–initiated base Sciences-Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. excision repair pathway (16). Although incorporation of uracil Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Molecular Cancer and 5-FU into DNA is well documented as a consequence of Research Online (http://mcr.aacrjournals.org/). exposure to TS inhibitors (15), the impact of the downstream Corresponding Author: Stanton L. Gerson, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, repair pathway directed by UDG on cell survival is not consistent. Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106. It has been hypothesized that thymine-less futile cycles of uracil Phone: 216-844-8562; Fax: 216-844-4975; E-mail: [email protected] misincorporation, excision by UDG, and further dUTP reinsertion doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0215 result in DNA strand breaks and cell death (17). If thymine-less Ó2017 American Association for Cancer Research. cell death was dependent on UDG-mediated removal of uracil 212 Mol Cancer Res; 16(2) February 2018 Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2018 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst November 8, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0215 UDG Depletion Resensitizes p53-Mutant Cells to 5-FdU and 5-FU, one would expect a correlation between the cytotoxicity Table 1. Cell lines and strains used in this work of TS inhibitors and UDG expression. However, the majority of Cell line Origin p53 status studies reported that neither overexpression, nor inhibition, of A375 Melanoma wt UDG affected the sensitivity to TS inhibitors in human, mouse, or LoVo Colon cancer wt – RKO Colon cancer wt chicken DT40 cells (16, 18 23). In contrast, recently both our and A2780 Ovarian cancer wt the Karnitz group observed that loss of UDG highly potentiated H460 Large cell lung cancer wt the cytotoxicity of 5-FdU in several cancer cell lines, indicating H1299 Non–small cell lung cancer null that uracil and 5-FU incorporation played a key role in cell killing OVCAR8 Ovarian cancer del 126-132 (24, 25). DLD1 Colon cancer S241F As the mediators of cell killing due to persistent uracil and 5-FU HEC1A Endometrial cancer R248Q lesions in DNA are not clear, we assessed the likely pathways and noted that one of the major differences in these disparate findings is that cancer cells bearing p53 mutations were used in our and sity, Cleveland, OH). Other cancer cell lines were purchased from Karnitz's experimental system, whereas nontransformed or p53 the American Type Culture Collection. Details of the cell lines (wild-type) WT cancer cells were used in the majorities of others used in this study are listed in Table 1. All cells were maintained in (16, 18–20, 22). Mutation of TP53 is the most frequently observed DMEM (Corning 15-017-CV) supplemented with 10% dialyzed gene alteration in cancers (26). Mutations in p53 have been FBS, 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, 1% MEM NEAA, 100 U/mL penicil- shown to influence cellular response to chemotherapeutic agents lin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin. Cells were incubated at 37Cin such as cisplatin, etoposide, and 5-FU (27, 28). Notably, sub- a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. 5-FdU and 5- stantial evidence reveals that loss of p53, or p53 mutations, is FU were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, dissolved respectively in linked to resistance to 5-FU due to inability to activate apoptosis Milli-Q water and DMSO, and stored as a 10 mmol/L stock at pathway. For example, a study using isogenic cell systems dem- À80C. Pemetrexed was purchased from LC laboratories and onstrated that deletion of p53 from a p53 WT colon cancer cell prepared fresh for each experiment by dissolving in Milli-Q water. line (HCT116) rendered cells remarkably resistant to apoptosis induced by 5-FU (29). In addition, 5-FU resistance was also Lentiviral shRNA knockdown described in a variety of p53-mutated cancer cells, including p53 or UDG knockdown (KD) was achieved via shRNA trans- colon, bladder, pancreatic, and gastric cancer (30–33). However, duction. Lentiviral vectors LV-THM-shp53 (which also expresses a few studies have reported on the link of p53 status with the GFP reporter) or LV-Bleo-shp53 to perform p53 KD in WT response to other TS inhibitors such as 5-FdU. HCT116 cells were obtained from Dr. Mark Jackson's laboratory Given the divergent cell models with different p53 status used at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (38). Lenti- in our and other studies, the following questions remain unan- viral vector targeting GFP (sh-GFP) was used as control. UDG swered: (1) does loss or mutation of p53 render cells resistant to 5- shRNA vectors (shUDG: NM_003362.2-656s21c1, shUDG-2: FdU, and (2) is the potentiated cytotoxicity of 5-FdU after UDG NM_003362.2-758s21c1, and shUDG-3: NM_003362.2- depletion reliant upon p53 status? To gain insight into these 893s21c1) were purchased from Sigma, and a scramble targeting questions, we tested the impact of UDG depletion on 5-FdU shRNA vector (Sigma) was used as paired control. The lentiviral cytotoxicity in a number of cancer cell lines with differing p53 production and infection were performed as previously described status. We found that, in general, loss or mutation of p53 remark- (24). Cells stably infected with LV-THM-p53 were isolated by cell ably reduced the sensitivity to 5-FdU, and depletion of UDG sorting on the basis of their GFP expression. Cells stably infected selectively resensitized p53-deficient or -mutated cancer cells to 5- with LV-Bleo-p53 were selected with zeocin (Sigma).
Recommended publications
  • RESEARCH ARTICLE Lobaplatin Combined Floxuridine/Pirarubicin
    DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.5.2057 The Effect Observation of LBP-based TACE for Unresectable Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma RESEARCH ARTICLE Lobaplatin Combined Floxuridine/Pirarubicin-based Transcatheter Hepatic Arterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Chang Zhao1, Xu-Jie Wang2*, Song Wang2*, Wei-Hua Feng2, Lei Shi2, Chun- Peng Yu2 Abstract Purpose: To assess the effect and safety of lobaplatin combinated floxuridine /pirarubicin in transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization(TACE) of unresectable primary liver cancer. Patients and Methods: TACE combined with the chemotherapy regimen was used to treat 34 unresectable primary liver cancer patients. DSA/ MRI/CT/blood routine examinations were used to evaluate short term activity and toxicity after 4-5 weeks, the process being repeated if necessary. Results: Among the 34 cases, 1 (2.9%) showed a complete response, 21 (61.7%) a partial response, 8 (23.5%) stable disease, and 4 progressive disease, with a total effective rate of 67.6%. The content of alpha fetoprotein dropped by over 50% in 20 cases (58.8%). The rate of recovery was hepatalgia (88.2%), ascites (47.1%), appetite (55.9%), Performance Status(30.4%). The median follow-up time (MFT) was 281 days (63-558 days), and median progression-free survival was 118.5 days (95%, CI:88.8-148.2days). Adverse reactions (III-IV grade) were not common, with only 4 cases of vomiting and 2 cases of thrombocytopenia (III grade). Conclusions: Lobaplatin-based TACE is an effective and safe treatment for primary liver cancer. Keywords: Primary hepatic carcinoma - chemoembolization - platinum chemotherapy - clinical response Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15 (5), 2057-2060 Introduction LBP-based TACE, male 29 cases, female 5 cases, average age for 57.2±10.7 years, 12 cases were biopsy-proven, Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common 22 cases were in line with the China Cancer Association malignant tumor .
    [Show full text]
  • In Vitro and in Vivo Reversal of Resistance to 5-Fluorouracil in Colorectal Cancer Cells with a Novel Stealth Double-Liposomal Formulation
    British Journal of Cancer (2007) 97, 919 – 926 & 2007 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved 0007 – 0920/07 $30.00 www.bjcancer.com In vitro and in vivo reversal of resistance to 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer cells with a novel stealth double-liposomal formulation 1 1 1 1 2 3 *,1 R Fanciullino , S Giacometti , C Mercier , C Aubert , C Blanquicett , P Piccerelle and J Ciccolini 1 2 EA3286-Laboratoire de Pharmacocine´tique, Universite´ de la Me´diterrane´e, Marseille, France; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory 3 University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Laboratoire de Pharmacie Gale´nique, Faculte´ de Pharmacie, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, Marseille 05 13385, France Drug resistance is a major cause of treatment failure in cancer chemotherapy, including that with the extensively prescribed antimetabolite, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In this study, we tried to reverse 5-FU resistance by using a double-punch strategy: combining 5-FU with a biochemical modulator to improve its tumoural activation and encapsulating both these agents in one same stealth liposome. Experiments carried out in the highly resistant, canonical SW620 human colorectal model showed a up to 80% sensitisation to 5-FU when these cells were treated with our liposomal formulation. Results with this formulation demonstrated 30% higher tumoural drug uptake, better activation with increased active metabolites including critical-5-fluoro-2-deoxyuridine-5-monophos- phate, superior inhibition (98%) of tumour thymidylate synthase, and subsequently, higher induction of both early and late apoptosis. Drug monitoring showed that higher and sustained exposure was achieved in rats treated with liposomal formulation. When examined in a xenograft animal model, our dual-agent liposomal formulation caused a 74% reduction in tumour size with a mean doubling in survival time, whereas standard 5-FU failed to exhibit significant antiproliferative activity as well as to increase the lifespan of tumour-bearing mice.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Floxuridine Oligonucleotide Conjugates Carrying Potential Enhancers of Cellular Uptake
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Evaluation of Floxuridine Oligonucleotide Conjugates Carrying Potential Enhancers of Cellular Uptake Anna Aviñó 1,2,*, Anna Clua 1,2 , Maria José Bleda 1 , Ramon Eritja 1,2,* and Carme Fàbrega 1,2 1 Institute for Advanced Chemistry of Catalonia (IQAC-CSIC), Jordi Girona 18-26, E-08034 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] (A.C.); [email protected] (M.J.B.); [email protected] (C.F.) 2 Networking Center on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Jordi Girona 18-26, E-08034 Barcelona, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.A.); [email protected] (R.E.); Tel.: +34-934-006-100 (A.A.) Abstract: Conjugation of small molecules such as lipids or receptor ligands to anti-cancer drugs has been used to improve their pharmacological properties. In this work, we studied the biological effects of several small-molecule enhancers into a short oligonucleotide made of five floxuridine units. Specifically, we studied adding cholesterol, palmitic acid, polyethyleneglycol (PEG 1000), folic acid and triantennary N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) as potential enhancers of cellular uptake. As expected, all these molecules increased the internalization efficiency with different degrees depending on the cell line. The conjugates showed antiproliferative activity due to their metabolic activation by nuclease degradation generating floxuridine monophosphate. The cytotoxicity and apoptosis assays showed an increase in the anti-cancer activity of the conjugates related to the floxuridine oligomer, but this effect did not correlate with the internalization results. Palmitic and folic acid conjugates provide the highest antiproliferative activity without having the highest internalization Citation: Aviñó, A.; Clua, A.; Bleda, results.
    [Show full text]
  • Floxuridine | Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    PATIENT & CAREGIVER EDUCATION Floxuridine This information from Lexicomp® explains what you need to know about this medication, including what it’s used for, how to take it, its side effects, and when to call your healthcare provider. Warning This drug may cause unsafe effects. You will be closely watched when starting this drug. What is this drug used for? It is used to treat cancer. What do I need to tell my doctor BEFORE I take this drug? If you are allergic to this drug; any part of this drug; or any other drugs, foods, or substances. Tell your doctor about the allergy and what signs you had. If you have any of these health problems: Poor nutrition, an infection, or certain bone marrow problems like low white blood cell count, low platelet count, or low red blood cell count. If you are breast-feeding. Do not breast-feed while you take this drug. Floxuridine 1/7 This is not a list of all drugs or health problems that interact with this drug. Tell your doctor and pharmacist about all of your drugs (prescription or OTC, natural products, vitamins) and health problems. You must check to make sure that it is safe for you to take this drug with all of your drugs and health problems. Do not start, stop, or change the dose of any drug without checking with your doctor. What are some things I need to know or do while I take this drug? Tell all of your health care providers that you take this drug. This includes your doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and dentists.
    [Show full text]
  • Prodrugs: a Challenge for the Drug Development
    PharmacologicalReports Copyright©2013 2013,65,1–14 byInstituteofPharmacology ISSN1734-1140 PolishAcademyofSciences Drugsneedtobedesignedwithdeliveryinmind TakeruHiguchi [70] Review Prodrugs:A challengeforthedrugdevelopment JolantaB.Zawilska1,2,JakubWojcieszak2,AgnieszkaB.Olejniczak1 1 InstituteofMedicalBiology,PolishAcademyofSciences,Lodowa106,PL93-232£ódŸ,Poland 2 DepartmentofPharmacodynamics,MedicalUniversityofLodz,Muszyñskiego1,PL90-151£ódŸ,Poland Correspondence: JolantaB.Zawilska,e-mail:[email protected] Abstract: It is estimated that about 10% of the drugs approved worldwide can be classified as prodrugs. Prodrugs, which have no or poor bio- logical activity, are chemically modified versions of a pharmacologically active agent, which must undergo transformation in vivo to release the active drug. They are designed in order to improve the physicochemical, biopharmaceutical and/or pharmacokinetic properties of pharmacologically potent compounds. This article describes the basic functional groups that are amenable to prodrug design, and highlights the major applications of the prodrug strategy, including the ability to improve oral absorption and aqueous solubility, increase lipophilicity, enhance active transport, as well as achieve site-selective delivery. Special emphasis is given to the role of the prodrug concept in the design of new anticancer therapies, including antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (ADEPT) andgene-directedenzymeprodrugtherapy(GDEPT). Keywords: prodrugs,drugs’ metabolism,blood-brainbarrier,ADEPT,GDEPT
    [Show full text]
  • Process for Producing Arsenic Trioxide Formulations
    (19) TZZ_964557B_T (11) EP 1 964 557 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: A61K 31/285 (2006.01) A61K 33/36 (2006.01) 02.01.2013 Bulletin 2013/01 A61P 35/02 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 08075200.9 (22) Date of filing: 10.11.1998 (54) Process for producing arsenic trioxide formulations Verfahren zur Herstellung von Arsentrioxidformulierungen Procédé de production de formulations à base de trioxide d’arsenic (84) Designated Contracting States: (74) Representative: Warner, James Alexander et al AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU Carpmaels & Ransford MC NL PT SE One Southampton Row London (30) Priority: 10.11.1997 US 64655 P WC1B 5HA (GB) (43) Date of publication of application: (56) References cited: 03.09.2008 Bulletin 2008/36 • KWONG Y L ET AL: "Delicious poison: Arsenic trioxide for the treatment of leukemia" BLOOD, (60) Divisional application: vol. 89, no. 9, 1 May 1997 (1997-05-01), pages 10177319.0 / 2 255 800 3487-3488, XP002195910 • SHEN S-X ET AL: "USE OF ARSENIC TRIOXIDE (62) Document number(s) of the earlier application(s) in (AS2O3) IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE accordance with Art. 76 EPC: PROMYELOCITIC LEUKEMIA (APL): II. CLINICAL 98957803.4 / 1 037 625 EFFICACY AND PHARMACOKINETICS IN RELAPSED PATIENTS" BLOOD, W.B. (73) Proprietor: MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING SAUNDERS, PHILADELPHIA, VA, US, vol. 89, no. CANCER CENTER 9, 1 May 1997 (1997-05-01), pages 3354-3360, New York, NY 10021 (US) XP000891715 ISSN: 0006-4971 • KONIG ET AL: "Comparative activity of (72) Inventors: melarsoprol and arsenic trioxide in chronic B - • Warrell, Raymond, P., Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • How Chemotherapy Drugs Work
    cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 How Chemotherapy Drugs Work Many different kinds of chemotherapy or chemo drugs are used to treat cancer – either alone or in combination with other drugs or treatments. These drugs are very different in their chemical composition (what they are made of), how they are prescribed and given, how useful they are in treating certain types of cancer, and the side effects they might have. It's important to know that not all medicines and drugs to treat cancer work the same way. Other drugs to treat cancer work differently, such as targeted therapy1, hormone therapy, and immunotherapy2. The information below describes how traditional or standard chemotherapy works. Chemotherapy works with the cell cycle Every time any new cell is formed, it goes through a usual process to become a fully functioning (or mature) cell. The process involves a series of phases and is called the cell cycle. Chemotherapy drugs target cells at different phases of the cell cycle. Understanding how these drugs work helps doctors predict which drugs are likely to work well together. Doctors can also plan how often doses of each drug should be given based on the timing of the cell phases. Cancer cells tend to form new cells more quickly than normal cells and this makes them a better target for chemotherapy drugs. However, chemo drugs can’t tell the difference between healthy cells and cancer cells. This means normal cells are damaged along with the cancer cells, and this causes side effects. Each time chemo is given, it means trying to find a balance between killing the cancer cells (in order to cure or control the disease) and sparing the normal cells (to lessen side effects).
    [Show full text]
  • Myocardial Ischemia and Acute Coronary Syndromes
    CHAPTER 23 Myocardial Ischemia and Acute Coronary Syndromes Kevin M. Sowinski Myocardial ischemia occurs as a result of increased The specific mechanisms by which drugs may facil- myocardial demand, decreased myocardial oxygen itate or cause MIs will be discussed. supply, or both, and most commonly occurs in An acute coronary syndrome is associated with patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. three clinical manifestations: ST- segment elevation This chapter discusses the specific mechanisms by MI, non-ST- segment elevation MI, and unstable which drug therapy may cause increased myocardial angina.1,2 For the purposes of this chapter, it is dif- oxygen demand or decreased supply. ficult to separate the acute coronary syndromes Angina pectoris is a clinical syndrome of chest because, for the most part, the individual case data discomfort caused by reversible myocardial isch- in the literature do not provide sufficient detail. emia that produces disturbances in myocardial Therefore, in most cases, the specific acute coro- function but no myocardial necrosis. Myocardial nary syndromes will not be discussed separately. ischemia can also occur without any symptoms of Furthermore, based on the available literature, it is angina and is typically referred to as silent myocar- difficult to distinguish drugs based on whether they dial ischemia. Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is a cause myocardial ischemia or infarction. clinical syndrome associated with the development of a prolonged occlusion of a coronary artery lead- CAUSATIVE AGENTS ing to decreased oxygen supply, myocardial isch- emia, and irreversible damage to myocardial tissue. Drugs reported to cause angina pectoris, myocar- MI in patients with coronary artery disease is usu- dial ischemia, an acute coronary syndrome, or all ally associated with a coronary artery thrombosis three are listed in Table 23-1.3-462 Drug- induced superimposed on a ruptured atherosclerotic plaque.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
    CLINICAL RESEARCH SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SCHEMA 7 1.0 BACKGROUND 8 1.1 Study Disease 8 1.2 Rationale 9 2.0 OBJECTIVES 9 2.1 Primary Objectives 9 2.2 Secondary Objectives 9 3.0 PATIENT SELECTION 10 3.1 Inclusion Criteria 10 3.2 Exclusion Criteria 11 3.3 Enrollment Procedures 12 4.0 TREATMENT PLAN 12 4.1 Agent Administration 12 4.2 Concurrent Medication 13 4.3 Drug Treatment Schedule 14 4.4 Duration of Therapy 14 5.0 CLINICAL AND LABORATORY EVALUATIONS 15 5.1 Baseline/Pretreatment Evaluation 15 5.2 Evaluations during Treatment 16 5.3 Post-treatment Evaluation for Patients Not Receiving Bone Marrow Transplant 17 5.4 Final Evaluations for Patients Accepted for Bone Marrow Transplant 18 6.0 DOSING DELAYS/DOSE MODIFICATIONS 18 6.1 Hematologic Toxicity 18 6.2 Non-hematologic Toxicity 18 7.0 AGENT FORMULATIONS AND PROCUREMENT 19 7.1 Zidovudine 19 7.2 Doxorubicin 20 7.3 Methotrexate 21 7.4 Hydroxyurea 22 7.5 Leucovorin 23 7.6 Ritiximab 24 8.0 CORRELATIVE/SPECIAL STUDIES 26 5 CLINICAL RESEARCH SERVICES 9.0 MEASUREMENT OF EFFECT 27 9.1 Response Assessment 27 9.2 Definition of Response 27 10.0 ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING 30 10.1 Definitions 30 10.2 Adverse Event Reporting With Commercial Agents 31 11.0 DATA REPORTING 32 11.1 Records to Be Kept 32 11.2 Role of Data Management 32 12.0 CRITERIA FOR DISCONTINUATION OF THERAPY 32 12.1 Permanent Withdrawal 32 12.1 Permanent Withdrawal Evaluations 32 13.0 STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 33 13.1 Overview 33 13.2 Definitions 33 13.3 Study Size and Precision 34 13.4 Statistical Analysis Plan 34 13.5 Correlative
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Oncology Criteria C16154-A
    Prior Authorization Criteria Standard Oncology Criteria Policy Number: C16154-A CRITERIA EFFECTIVE DATES: ORIGINAL EFFECTIVE DATE LAST REVIEWED DATE NEXT REVIEW DATE DUE BEFORE 03/2016 12/2/2020 1/26/2022 HCPCS CODING TYPE OF CRITERIA LAST P&T APPROVAL/VERSION N/A RxPA Q1 2021 20210127C16154-A PRODUCTS AFFECTED: See dosage forms DRUG CLASS: Antineoplastic ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION: Variable per drug PLACE OF SERVICE: Retail Pharmacy, Specialty Pharmacy, Buy and Bill- please refer to specialty pharmacy list by drug AVAILABLE DOSAGE FORMS: Abraxane (paclitaxel protein-bound) Cabometyx (cabozantinib) Erwinaze (asparaginase) Actimmune (interferon gamma-1b) Calquence (acalbrutinib) Erwinia (chrysantemi) Adriamycin (doxorubicin) Campath (alemtuzumab) Ethyol (amifostine) Adrucil (fluorouracil) Camptosar (irinotecan) Etopophos (etoposide phosphate) Afinitor (everolimus) Caprelsa (vandetanib) Evomela (melphalan) Alecensa (alectinib) Casodex (bicalutamide) Fareston (toremifene) Alimta (pemetrexed disodium) Cerubidine (danorubicin) Farydak (panbinostat) Aliqopa (copanlisib) Clolar (clofarabine) Faslodex (fulvestrant) Alkeran (melphalan) Cometriq (cabozantinib) Femara (letrozole) Alunbrig (brigatinib) Copiktra (duvelisib) Firmagon (degarelix) Arimidex (anastrozole) Cosmegen (dactinomycin) Floxuridine Aromasin (exemestane) Cotellic (cobimetinib) Fludara (fludarbine) Arranon (nelarabine) Cyramza (ramucirumab) Folotyn (pralatrexate) Arzerra (ofatumumab) Cytosar-U (cytarabine) Fusilev (levoleucovorin) Asparlas (calaspargase pegol-mknl Cytoxan (cyclophosphamide)
    [Show full text]
  • Lung Cancer in HIV-Infected Patients and the Role of Targeted Therapy Marco Ruiz, MD MPH, FACP, and Robert a Ramirez, DO, FACP
    Review Lung cancer in HIV-infected patients and the role of targeted therapy Marco Ruiz, MD MPH, FACP, and Robert A Ramirez, DO, FACP Section of Hematology Oncology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans Lung cancer is one of the most common malignancies in HIV-infected patients. Prevalence and mortality outcomes are higher in HIV-infected populations than in noninfected patients. There are several oral agents available for patients who harbor specifc mutations, but little is known about mutations and affected pathways in HIV-infected patients with lung cancer. Recent trials have facilitated the inclusion of HIV-infected patients in clinical trials, but the population is remains underrepresented in oncology trials. Here, we review the literature on lung cancer in HIV-infected patients, and discuss common mutations in lung cancer and HIV- infected patients, the role of mutational analysis, and the potential role of targeted therapy in the treatment of lung cancer in HIV- infected populations. ung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed the SEER-Medicare database, reviewed lung cancer cancer worldwide and accounted for about mortality in aging HIV-infected patients (>65 years) L1.57 million deaths in 2012.1 Te American and showed diferent results. In one of the stud- Lung Association predicted there would be about ies, the population of aging HIV-infected patients 221,200 new cases and 158,040 lung cancer-related seemed to have mortality rates similar to those of deaths in the United States in 2015.2 Notably, lung
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Arsenic Trioxide on Radiofrequency Ablation of VX2
    Original Article http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.2.195 pISSN 1229-6929 · eISSN 2005-8330 Korean J Radiol 2012;13(2):195-201 Effects of Arsenic Trioxide on Radiofrequency Ablation of VX2 Liver Tumor: Intraarterial versus Intravenous Administration Nak Jong Seong, MD1, Chang Jin Yoon, MD1, Sung-Gwon Kang, MD1, Jin Wook Chung, MD2, Hyo-Cheol Kim, MD2, Jae Hyung Park, MD2 1Division of Intervention, Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 463-707, Korea; 2Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, and Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 110-744, Korea Objective: Arsenic trioxide (As2O3) can be used as a possible pharmaceutical alternative that augments radiofrequency (RF) ablation by reducing tumor blood flow. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of intraarterial and intravenous administration of As2O3 on RF-induced ablation in an experimentally induced liver tumor. Materials and Methods: VX2 carcinoma was grown in the livers of 30 rabbits. As2O3 (1 mg/kg) was administered through the hepatic artery (n = 10, group A) or ear vein (n = 10, group B), 30 minutes before RF ablation (125 mA ± 35; 90 ± 5°C). As a control group, 10 rabbits were treated with RF ablation alone (group C). RF was intentionally applied to the peripheral margin of the tumor so that ablation can cover the tumor and adjacent hepatic parenchyma. Ablation areas of the tumor and adjacent parenchymal changes among three groups were compared by the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test.
    [Show full text]