DOCSLIB.ORG

Conference Proceedings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conference Proceedings A Conference on Restoring Ecological Processes, Ecosystems and Landscapes in a Changing World 5-9 February 2017, Armidale NSW Australia CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS www.conferencecompany.com.au/revegconf2017 These conference proceedings are published by Ecosystem Management, School of Environmental and Rural Science at the University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351. The papers contained within these proceedings were presented during Restore, Regenerate, Revegetate: A Conference on Restoring Ecological Processes, Ecosystems and Landscapes in a Changing World, held at the University of New England from 5–9 February 2017. The views and interpretations expressed in these papers are those of the authors of the papers published in these proceedings and do not represent the views of the Editor, the Conference Organising Committee or the University of New England. Whilst papers were subjected to review by at least two anonymous reviewers, accuracy of information and the content of papers remains the responsibility of the authors. Copyright remains with the authors. Papers may be reproduced in part or whole with permission from the authors and appropriate citation of these proceedings. Citation These proceedings may be cited as: Smith, R. (editor) (2018) Proceedings of Restore, Regenerate, Revegetate: A Conference on Restoring Ecological Processes, Ecosystems and Landscapes in a Changing World. Held at the University of New England, Armidale, from 5–9 February 2017 (Ecosystem Management, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia). Available at: https://www.une.edu.au/about-une/academic-schools/school-of-environmental-and-rural-science/ers- news-and-events/restore-regenerate-revegetate-conference-2017 ISBN: 978-1-921 597-76-3 Acknowledgements The editor would like to thank the authors and reviewers of the papers published in these proceedings, the Conference Organising Committee and the delegates that attended the conference and made it so successful. Editor’s contact details Rhiannon Smith, Ecosystem Management, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale NSW, Australia 2351. email: [email protected], phone: (02) 6773 3297. © The Authors February 2018 Restore, Regenerate, Revegetate A Conference on Restoring Ecological processes, Ecosystems and landscapes in a Changing World Proceedings of the Conference Armidale, New South Wales February 2018 Conference Sponsors Platinum Sponsor Silver Sponsors Plenary Session Sponsor Symposium Sponsors Official Travel Program Book Refreshment Break Sponsor Sponsor Sponsor Post-Conference Excursion Sponsor Prizes and Donations General Supporters ii Restore, Regenerate, Revegetate Conference Proceedings, February 2018 Foreword The sustainable management and restoration of terrestrial ecosystems has never been more important and challenging, given humankind’s growing reach throughout the biosphere and the resulting accelerating changes from local to global level. In February 2017, Restore, Regenerate, Revegetate conference delegates convened at the University of New England to share our understanding of the challenges and successes in restoration science in a fast-changing world. We hosted some of Australia’s and the world’s leading practitioners, scientists, consultants and advisers working in this space. A decade had passed since the revegetation industry, landcarers, mine rehabilitation experts, carbon farmers, wildlife scientists, natural resource managers, restoration ecologists, conservation biologists and social scientists last met nationally to review current theory and practice in restoration and landscape repair to sustain ecosystems and services for multiple objectives. More than 360 delegates attended Restore, Regenerate, Revegetate, which featured 190 presentations including 27 plenary and keynote speakers. Delegates included scientists, practitioners, landholders, Indigenous land managers and groups, and government and non-government organisations. The program covered a full spectrum of restoration topics, including the social and political facets of restoration; the practical aspects of restoration project design and execution; the sustainability of restoration in the face of continuing landscape and climate change, and restoration end points, goals and case studies. The symposia topics included: • Seed genetics and management • Broad-acre revegetation strategies and techniques • Riparian restoration and revegetation • Cost-effective revegetation and restoration • Connectivity for biodiversity in fragmented landscapes • Sustainable revegetation in a changing world: planning and design issues • Revegetation for ecosystem service provision • Restoration and indigenous NRM • Sociology of restoration, revegetation and landscape repair • Grazing management for biodiversity conservation • Restoration on farms • Soils and restoration • Monitoring, evaluation, reporting and improvement of restoration and revegetation programs • Policy drivers for restoration • Invasive species and agri-ecosystem restoration • The role of fauna in restoration The role of the arts in communicating environmental messages was explored through engaging performance, artwork and a public forum in the Armidale Town Hall, and delegates visited local restoration projects and practitioners during a ¾-day field trip. In addition to these conference proceedings, video recordings of most conference presentations may be found at: https://www.une.edu.au/about-une/academic-schools/school-of-environmental-and-rural-science/ers-news-and- events/restore-regenerate-revegetate-conference-2017 The first of two journal special issues containing invited papers by conference plenary and keynote speakers can be found at: The Rangeland Journal, Vol. 39(5 & 6), 2017 http://www.publish.csiro.au/rj The second is due to be published as a special online issue of Ecological Management and Restoration later in 2018 at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-8903 On behalf of all my fellow organisers, I would like to extend my thanks to all the conference delegates who made the conference such a memorable event, to our generous sponsors shown on the opposite page, and to Dr Rhiannon Smith who singlehandedly managed the editing and refereeing of these conference proceedings. Professor Nick C. H. Reid Chair, Conference Organising Committee University of New England 18 February 2018 Restore, Regenerate, Revegetate Conference Proceedings, February 2018 iii The Armidale Declaration Agreed to by the approximately 120 delegates attending the final plenary session on 9 February 2017, at: Restore, Regenerate, Revegetate: A Conference about Restoring Ecological Processes, Ecosystems and Landscapes in a Changing World The delegates at the Restore, Regenerate, Revegetate Conference held at the University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, from 5–9 February 2017, shared an impressive body of practical and scientific knowledge of how we are restoring Australia’s natural heritage and environmental capital across the continent. However, the conference also highlighted several key points that must be addressed if we are to truly meet the challenges and opportunities of land repair. • We acknowledge the success of the last 30 years of land restoration and rehabilitation, but decry the continuing decline in the extent and condition of Australia’s native terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems and the impact that this will have on the health, prosperity, wellbeing and cultural legacy of future Australians. • We celebrate the significant contributions of many communities across Australia to repair their local environments. However, we have only just begun to address the vast challenge that confronts us. We have developed the skills, knowledge and passion to meet this challenge, but lack the market drivers to achieve the scale of response required. • We urge support for Indigenous groups so they can continue to work on country to manage our natural resources through the application of cultural science. • We urge effective action to limit human-induced climate change, which is crucial if we are to build on present and future restoration efforts. • We recommend ensuring that the principle of ‘net gain in biodiversity’ underpins all environmental regulation. • We recommend the development of a stable investment process that is decoupled from politics, has bipartisan support, retains and enhances social capital, and is independently administered, to support the actions and research required to reverse the ongoing decline in Australia’s natural terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems (natural capital). • We recommend the establishment of a federal agency as the premier research and development organisation for promoting the productive and sustainable use of resources in rural Australia, in accord with the 2011 recommendations of the Productivity Commission. • We recommend the support and continued development of stable, long-term government institutions for natural resource administration and management, and the facilitation of strong partnerships between government, community and industry. • Finally, we recommend commonwealth, state and local governments define and mandate the use of native flora as an essential component in restoration and landscaping works associated with publicly funded road, rail and other infrastructure programs. Contact: David Carr BSc MResSc (NE) Stringybark Ecological 7 Taylor St, Armidale NSW 2350 Website: www.stringybarkecological.com.au
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Differences in Functional Trait Distribution Between Inselberg and Adjacent Matrix Floras
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Ecology Volume 2016, Article ID 6417913, 7 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6417913 Research Article Differences in Functional Trait Distribution between Inselberg and Adjacent Matrix Floras John T. Hunter School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, Australia Correspondence should be addressed to John T. Hunter; [email protected] Received 30 June 2016; Accepted 26 September 2016 Academic Editor: Bela´ Tothm´ er´ esz´ Copyright © 2016 John T. Hunter. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Inselbergs and the adjacent matrix represent extremes of different environmental conditions and should shed light on the changing allocation of plant resources across strong and abrupt resource gradients. Here I use collated life history trait data from 840 taxa found within typical insular inselberg and adjacent matrix floras from the New England Batholith region of eastern Australia. These species were sorted into guilds of specificity to the inselberg environment. Scored traits include life form, plant height, leaf area, fruit size, seed size, mono- or polycarpy, underground storage organs, regenerative/clonality, and flowering phenology. With reduced water and nutrient resources, typical of inselbergs, allocation of plant resources to vegetative reproduction and storage organs is a disadvantage. Plants restricted to inselbergs were shorter, usually polycarpic shrubs, with smaller leaves, fruits, and seeds. Flowering time was found to be earlier and reduced in length; diaspores often have dormancy and are dispersed locally in comparison to the matrix.
    [Show full text]
  • Grass Genera in Townsville
    Grass Genera in Townsville Nanette B. Hooker Photographs by Chris Gardiner SCHOOL OF MARINE and TROPICAL BIOLOGY JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY TOWNSVILLE QUEENSLAND James Cook University 2012 GRASSES OF THE TOWNSVILLE AREA Welcome to the grasses of the Townsville area. The genera covered in this treatment are those found in the lowland areas around Townsville as far north as Bluewater, south to Alligator Creek and west to the base of Hervey’s Range. Most of these genera will also be found in neighbouring areas although some genera not included may occur in specific habitats. The aim of this book is to provide a description of the grass genera as well as a list of species. The grasses belong to a very widespread and large family called the Poaceae. The original family name Gramineae is used in some publications, in Australia the preferred family name is Poaceae. It is one of the largest flowering plant families of the world, comprising more than 700 genera, and more than 10,000 species. In Australia there are over 1300 species including non-native grasses. In the Townsville area there are more than 220 grass species. The grasses have highly modified flowers arranged in a variety of ways. Because they are highly modified and specialized, there are also many new terms used to describe the various features. Hence there is a lot of terminology that chiefly applies to grasses, but some terms are used also in the sedge family. The basic unit of the grass inflorescence (The flowering part) is the spikelet. The spikelet consists of 1-2 basal glumes (bracts at the base) that subtend 1-many florets or flowers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Assessment Report
    Ecological Assessment Report White Rock Wind Farm Near Glen Innes, NSW Prepared by: Prepared for: RPS Epuron Pty Ltd PO Box 428 Level 11, 75 Miller Street Hamilton NSW 2303 North Sydney NSW 2060 T: +61 4940 4200 F: +61 4961 6794 E: [email protected] W: rpsgroup.com.au Report No: 104226 Version/Date: Final / March 2011 rpsgroup.com.au Document Status Review Format Issue Version Purpose of Document Orig Review Approval Date Review Date Draft 1 Draft for Client Review PH TL 23-11-10 JH 24-11-10 T Lambert 24-11-10 Draft 2 Draft for Client Review PH TL 26-11-10 - T Lambert 26-11-10 Final Final for Issue PH TL 13-12-10 JH 13-12-10 T Lambert 13-12-10 Final Revised Final for Issue PH TL 7-3-11 - T Lambert 7-3-11 Disclaimers This document is and shall remain the property of RPS. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised copying or use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. rpsgroup.com.au Executive Summary This report undertakes a flora and fauna assessment for a proposal south-west of Glen Innes, NSW. The proposal would comprise 119 wind turbines, with a maximum height of 150 metres, and associated powerlines and access roads. Two Endangered Ecological Communities (EECs) were identified within the study area, namely, Ribbon Gum – Mountain Gum Woodland (EEC – Ribbon Gum – Mountain Gum – Snow Gum Grassy Forest/Woodland of the New England Tableland Region) and Yellow Box Woodland (EEC White Box Yellow Box Blakely's Red Gum Woodland).
    [Show full text]
  • CAEPR WORKING PAPER No. 75/2010
    CENTRE FOR ABORIGINAL ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH Looking After Country in New South Wales: Two Case Studies of Socioeconomic Benefits for Aboriginal People J. Hunt CAEPR WORKING PAPER No. 75/2010 ANU COLLEGE OF ARTS & SOCIAL SCIENCES Series Note The Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR) was established at The Australian National University (ANU) in April 1990. Since 1 January 2010, CAEPR has operated as an academic unit within the Research School of Social Sciences in the College of Arts and Social Sciences at ANU. The Centre is funded from a variety of sources including ANU, Australian Research Council, industry and philanthropic partners, the Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, and State and Territory governments. CAEPR’s principal objective is to undertake high-quality, independent research that will assist in furthering the social and economic development and empowerment of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people throughout Australia. Its aim is to combine academic and teaching excellence on Indigenous economic and social development and public policy with realism, objectivity and relevance. CAEPR is Australia’s foremost social science research centre focusing on Indigenous economic and social policy from a national perspective. The Centre’s publications, which include the CAEPR Working Paper series established in 1999, aim to report on Indigenous circumstance, inform public debate, examine government policy, and influence policy formulation. Working Papers are often work-in-progress
    [Show full text]
  • NPWS Annual Report 2000-2001 (PDF
    Annual report 2000-2001 NPWS mission NSW national Parks & Wildlife service 2 Contents Director-General’s foreword 6 3 Conservation management 43 Working with Aboriginal communities 44 Overview 8 Joint management of national parks 44 Mission statement 8 Performance and future directions 45 Role and functions 8 Outside the reserve system 46 Partners and stakeholders 8 Voluntary conservation agreements 46 Legal basis 8 Biodiversity conservation programs 46 Organisational structure 8 Wildlife management 47 Lands managed for conservation 8 Performance and future directions 48 Organisational chart 10 Ecologically sustainable management Key result areas 12 of NPWS operations 48 Threatened species conservation 48 1 Conservation assessment 13 Southern Regional Forest Agreement 49 NSW Biodiversity Strategy 14 Caring for the environment 49 Regional assessments 14 Waste management 49 Wilderness assessment 16 Performance and future directions 50 Assessment of vacant Crown land in north-east New South Wales 19 Managing our built assets 51 Vegetation surveys and mapping 19 Buildings 51 Wetland and river system survey and research 21 Roads and other access 51 Native fauna surveys and research 22 Other park infrastructure 52 Threat management research 26 Thredbo Coronial Inquiry 53 Cultural heritage research 28 Performance and future directions 54 Conservation research and assessment tools 29 Managing site use in protected areas 54 Performance and future directions 30 Performance and future directions 54 Contributing to communities 55 2 Conservation planning
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Consultation
    Biodiversity Assessment Report White Rock Wind Farm Modification APPENDIX A CONSULTATION 16 – 321 WRWF BAR Final v2 A‐I Biodiversity Assessment Report White Rock Wind Farm Modification APPENDIX B SPECIES LISTS 16 – 321 WRWF BAR Final v2 B‐I Scientific name Family Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 Q19 Q20 Q21 Q22 Q23 Q24 Q25 Q26 Q27 Q28 Q29 Q30 Q31 Q32 Q33 Q34 Q35 Q36 Q37 Q38 Q39 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q44 Q45 Q46 Tricoryne elatior Anthericaceae X Dichopogon fimbritus Anthericaceae XX X *Cyclospermum leptophyllum Apiaceae X X X X X X X Daucus glochidiatus Apiaceae XXXXXXXXXXX Hydrocotyle laxiflora Araliaceae X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Bulbine bulbosa Asphodelaceae X XX X X *Cirsium vulgare Asteraceae X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Taraxacum officinale Asteraceae X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X *Sonchus oleraceus Asteraceae X X X X X X X *Conyza bonariensis Asteraceae X X X X X X X X X X X X Vittadinia muelleri Asteraceae XX Euchiton involucratus Asteraceae X XXX Brachyschome nova‐angelica Asteraceae X XXXX X Ammobium alatum Asteraceae X X X X X X *Hypochaeris radicata Asteraceae X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X *Sonchus asper Asteraceae X X X X X X X X X X X X *Carthamus lanatus Asteraceae X X *Bidens pilosa Asteraceae X X X X X X Chrysocephalum apiculatum Asteraceae X XX Senecio diaschides Asteraceae XX XX Cymbonotus lasonianus Asteraceae XX X Calotis cuneifolia Asteraceae XXX X X *Tagetes minuta Asteraceae XX X X *Centaurea solstitialis Asteraceae XX Calotis
    [Show full text]
  • Cunninghamia Date of Publication: September 2016 a Journal of Plant Ecology for Eastern Australia
    Cunninghamia Date of Publication: September 2016 A journal of plant ecology for eastern Australia ISSN 0727- 9620 (print) • ISSN 2200 - 405X (Online) Vegetation of Naree and Yantabulla stations on the Cuttaburra Creek, Far North Western Plains, New South Wales John T. Hunter1 & Vanessa H. Hunter2 1School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351 AUSTRALIA; email: [email protected] 2Hewlett Hunter Pty Ltd, Armidale, NSW 2350 AUSTRALIA. Abstract: Naree and Yantabulla stations (31,990 ha) are found 60 km south-east of Hungerford and 112 km north-west of Bourke, New South Wales (lat. 29° 55'S; long. 150°37'N). The properties occur on the Cuttaburra Creek within the Mulga Lands Bioregion. We describe the vegetation assemblages found on these properties within three hierarchical levels (Group, Alliance & Association). Vegetation levels are defined based on flexible UPGMA analysis of cover- abundance scores of all vascular plant taxa. These vegetation units are mapped based on extensive ground truthing, SPOT5 imagery interpretation and substrate. Three ‘Group’ level vegetation types are described: Mulga Complex, Shrublands Complex and Floodplain Wetlands Complex. Within these Groups nine ‘Alliances’ are described: Rat’s tail Couch – Lovegrass Grasslands, Canegrass Grasslands, Lignum – Glinus Shrublands, Coolibah – Black Box Woodlands, Turpentine – Button Grass – Windmill Grass Shrublands, Turpentine – Hop Bush – Kerosene Grass shrublands and Mulga Shrublands. Sixteen ‘Associations’ are described 1)
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation and Floristics of Butterleaf National Park, Butterleaf State Conservation Area and the Bezzants Lease
    Vegetation and Floristics of Butterleaf National Park, Butterleaf State Conservation Area and the Bezzants Lease Dr John T. Hunter May 2011 23 Kendall Rd, Invergowrie NSW, 2350 Ph. & Fax: (02) 6775 2452 Email: [email protected] A Report to the New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service & the Nature Conservation Trust of NSW i Vegetation of Butterleaf & Bezzants Lease Summary The vegetation of the Butterleaf National Park and State Conservation Area and Bezzant’s Lease is described and mapped (scale 1:25 000). Nine communities and three sub-associations are defined based on classification (Kulczynski association). These eight communities and three sub-associations were mapped based on ground truthing, air photo interpretation and landform. The communities described and their status is: Floristic Community Area Reservation Status C1a: Eucalyptus radiata – E. Not listed as a community of concern though 1,875 ha campanulata – E. obliqua likely a unique association within the area. C1b: Eucalyptus obliqua – E. Not listed as a community of concern. 263 ha brunnea – E. saligna C1c: Eucalyptus campanulata Not listed as a community of concern. 250 ha – E. obliqua – E. saligna C2: Eucalyptus acaciiformis – Likely to be included as an Endangered Angophora floribunda Ecological Community within the Montane 8.7 ha Peatlands and Swamps determination of the TSC Act. C3: Eucalyptus caliginosa – Not listed as a community of concern though E. bridgesiana – E. 433 ha likely a unique association within the area. laevopinea C4: Eucalyptus nova-anglica Would fall within the Endangered Ecological – E. acaciiformis – E. 39.8 ha Community New England Peppermint subtilior Woodland on the TSC and EPBC Acts.
    [Show full text]
  • Rangelands, Western Australia
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary: Wimmera, Victoria
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Information Notes for Bezzants Lease Conservation Area
    Attachment C Management Information Notes for Bezzants Lease Conservation Area Spotted sun orchid Threatened species and ecological communities profiles The following profiles are provided with permission from NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change. Profiles of species listed under the commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 and the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 are sourced from the DECC website: http://www.threatenedspecies.environment.nsw.gov.au/tsprofile/index.aspx Some information from these sources has been omitted for the purposes of this plan, full profile information can be found at the above mentioned website. The Nature Conservation Trust is responsible for ensuring the most current profile information available has been sourced from the Departmental websites. Maps of location records are sourced from the NSW Government Bionet website: http://www.bionet.nsw.gov.au/SpeciesFound.cfm?SearchType=Sci&Agency=AMPub%2CNP Pub%2CFishPub%2CStateFPub&AreaName=NSW+incl.+Lord+Howe&MapAreaType=3&Ma pType=All+NSW&AreaID=2&Kingdom (accessed 8/1/10). Management Information Notes – Bezzants Lease – May 2011 Page | 2 Barking Owl Ninox connivens Conservation status in NSW: VulneraBle Description The BarkingOwlisatypicalhawk-owl, with staring, yellow eyes and no facial-disc. It is grey to greyish-brown above, with white spots on the wings and almost white underneath with greyish-brown vertical streaks. The larger male may be up to 45 cm in length, larger than the Southern Boobook Ninox novaeseelandiae and smaller than the Powerful Owl N. strenua. It has an unmistakable, quick, dog-like ‘wook-wook’ territorial call, which it repeats. Pairs of birds perform call-and-answer duets; the male’s call is slower and deeper.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Public Land Properties
    Appendiix 10: Liist of publliic lland propertiies Name Area (ha) Mgt plan Fire strategy Commonwealth lands Airport 1 175 Bundjalung Bombing Range Defense Reserve 2 233 Education Reserve 360 National Parks & Wildlife— national parks Arakwal National Park 177 Final Final Bago Bluff National Park 4 016 Final Final Bald Rock National Park 7 793 Final Final Barool National Park 11 211 Final Final Basket Swamp National Park 2 819 Final Final Bellinger River National Park 2 829 Final Bindarri National Park 5 584 Draft Final Biriwal Bulga National Park 6 512 Final Final Bongil Bongil National Park 4 207 Final Final Boonoo Boonoo National Park 5 126 Final Final Border Ranges National Park 31 861 Final Broadwater National Park 4 055 Final Final Bundjalung National Park 18 898 Final Final Bungawalbin National Park 3 722 Final Butterleaf National Park 618 Final Capoompeta National Park 1 881 Final Final Carrai National Park 11 366 Draft Cascade National Park 3 613 Draft Final Cataract National Park 3 847 Final Cathedral Rock National Park 11 008 Final Final Chaelundi National Park 21 048 Draft Final Coorabakh National Park 1 364 Draft Final Cottan–Bimbang National Park 20 356 Final Crowdy Bay National Park 6 436 Final Final Cunnawarra National Park 16 311 Final Final Dooragan National Park 1 070 Final Final Dorrigo National Park 11 762 Final Dunggir National Park 2 623 Final Final Fortis Creek National Park 7 909 Draft Gibraltar Range National Park 25 382 Final Final Goonengerry National Park 442 Final Final Gumbaynggirr National Park 4 905 Guy Fawkes
    [Show full text]