A Window Into Africa's Past Hydroclimates: The
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Models and Methods of Tectonic Geomorphology and the Reconstruction of Hominin Landscapes
This is a repository copy of Landscapes of human evolution : models and methods of tectonic geomorphology and the reconstruction of hominin landscapes. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/11178/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Bailey, G.N. orcid.org/0000-0003-2656-830X, Reynolds, Sally and King, G.C.P. (2011) Landscapes of human evolution : models and methods of tectonic geomorphology and the reconstruction of hominin landscapes. Journal of Human Evolution. pp. 257-80. ISSN 0047-2484 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.01.004 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ This is an author-created pdf. Cite as: In press, J Hum Evol (2010), doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.01.004 Landscapes of human evolution: models and methods of tectonic geomorphology and the reconstruction of hominin landscapes Geoffrey N. Bailey 1 Sally C. Reynolds 2, 3 Geoffrey C. -
Pleistocene Palaeoart of Africa
Arts 2013, 2, 6-34; doi:10.3390/arts2010006 OPEN ACCESS arts ISSN 2076-0752 www.mdpi.com/journal/arts Review Pleistocene Palaeoart of Africa Robert G. Bednarik International Federation of Rock Art Organizations (IFRAO), P.O. Box 216, Caulfield South, VIC 3162, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-3-95230549; Fax: +61-3-95230549 Received: 22 December 2012; in revised form: 22 January 2013 / Accepted: 23 January 2013 / Published: 8 February 2013 Abstract: This comprehensive review of all currently known Pleistocene rock art of Africa shows that the majority of sites are located in the continent’s south, but that the petroglyphs at some of them are of exceptionally great antiquity. Much the same applies to portable palaeoart of Africa. The current record is clearly one of paucity of evidence, in contrast to some other continents. Nevertheless, an initial synthesis is attempted, and some preliminary comparisons with the other continents are attempted. Certain parallels with the existing record of southern Asia are defined. Keywords: rock art; portable palaeoart; Pleistocene; figurine; bead; engraving; Africa 1. Introduction Although palaeoart of the Pleistocene occurs in at least five continents (Bednarik 1992a, 2003a) [38,49], most people tend to think of Europe first when the topic is mentioned. This is rather odd, considering that this form of evidence is significantly more common elsewhere, and very probably even older there. For instance there are far less than 10,000 motifs in the much-studied corpus of European rock art of the Ice Age, which are outnumbered by the number of publications about them. -
The Aurignacian Viewed from Africa
Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University THE AURIGNACIAN VIEWED FROM AFRICA Christian A. TRYON Introduction 20 The African archeological record of 43-28 ka as a comparison 21 A - The Aurignacian has no direct equivalent in Africa 21 B - Archaic hominins persist in Africa through much of the Late Pleistocene 24 C - High modification symbolic artifacts in Africa and Eurasia 24 Conclusions 26 Acknowledgements 26 References cited 27 To cite this article Tryon C. A. , 2015 - The Aurignacian Viewed from Africa, in White R., Bourrillon R. (eds.) with the collaboration of Bon F., Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe, Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University, P@lethnology, 7, 19-33. http://www.palethnologie.org 19 P@lethnology | 2015 | 19-33 Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University THE AURIGNACIAN VIEWED FROM AFRICA Christian A. TRYON Abstract The Aurignacian technocomplex in Eurasia, dated to ~43-28 ka, has no direct archeological taxonomic equivalent in Africa during the same time interval, which may reflect differences in inter-group communication or differences in archeological definitions currently in use. Extinct hominin taxa are present in both Eurasia and Africa during this interval, but the African archeological record has played little role in discussions of the demographic expansion of Homo sapiens, unlike the Aurignacian. Sites in Eurasia and Africa by 42 ka show the earliest examples of personal ornaments that result from extensive modification of raw materials, a greater investment of time that may reflect increased their use in increasingly diverse and complex social networks. -
Diretor Eoonft^Ro Fl^H^H^HH
-{¦»»"<¦<» .«|i.» vw-m ...... *.v V-;« • • . ¦ »••• ."¦ ' ¦ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^mKmmmmmmMmmmmi ^àb ftll.a.. ...¦ æ' "%#f ABROPORTO-0 è. B f hri^entes argentinos só deixam Brasil treinar em campinJio - æ/\y,p»»a>i> f de pelada || ^»oa Pagino 22 M? 6t an EMB.AMERICA Thr A ' •tlrcttr.VfttMettai C * a v • •-« • J «Io rttasi «a jurau* dt Jaaelre, •¦. BI-HtMit-tetuáreli^¦rtslt tlrra.filra, 17-7-lttl luto Otratue ia Magalhlti Ate LXXI _ Correio da Manha N.« U»U 2M ABOLO SUPERA MLHA • COLEBA-AVene-uf 1* foi o ptimtlro palt ml- •merictno ¦ tomar providên- clu prtvtntlvtt contrt o turto de cólera que começa a aparecer na Espanha. A partir dt ontem, nos portos e, aeroportos venezuelanos, SEGUE RUMO está sendo exigido um cer- A LUA tlflctdo do vacina 1.E contra a cólera aos ptiitgciroí pro* Algumas horas cadentes dt cidades tspanho* Ias. No Brasil, ainda nlo foi diretor após um tomada EOONft^ro nenhuma medida dt' lançamento sem prevenção, pois o Ministério fl^H^H^HH da Saúde ainda nlo recebeu problemas, qualquer comunicado da considerado dos Orguüiaçfo Mundial de Abate de Saúde. Entretanto, vai ser mais a •idades ai auto* gado perfeitos, brasileiras afirmam NASA esteve a que estlo vigilantes para a fiscalização e — st necessa- reduzido ponto de suspender no — vacinação dos paisa* em agosto a missão Apolo-15. geiroa procedentes de cerca já de trinta tia Aírlca Logo depois da países e A partir de 18 de agosto da Ásia. próximo, o abate de gado bovino operação de pelos frigoríficos será reduzido a 50 cento da média das • BALAIO - O "Baiaio". -
Excavations at Mlambalasi Rockshelter: a Terminal Pleistocene to Recent Iron Age Record in Southern Tanzania
Afr Archaeol Rev DOI 10.1007/s10437-017-9253-3 RESEARCH REPORT Excavations at Mlambalasi Rockshelter: a Terminal Pleistocene to Recent Iron Age Record in Southern Tanzania K. M. Biittner & E. A. Sawchuk & J. M. Miller & J. J. Werner & P. M. Bushozi & P. R. Willoughby # The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract The Mlambalasi rockshelter in the Iringa Re- millennia as diverse human groups were repeatedly gion of southern Tanzania has rich artifactual deposits attracted to this fixed feature on the landscape. spanning the Later Stone Age (LSA), Iron Age, and historic periods. Middle Stone Age (MSA) artifacts are Résumé L'abri sous roche Mlambalasi dans la région also present on the slope in front of the rockshelter. d'Iringa au sud de la Tanzanie est riche en artéfacts du Extensive, systematic excavations in 2006 and 2010 Paléolithique supérieur jusqu'à l'âge du fer et la by members of the Iringa Region Archaeological Project période historique. Des artéfacts du Paléolithique (IRAP) illustrate a complex picture of repeated occupa- moyen sont présents sur le versant en face de l'abri. tions and reuse of the rockshelter during an important Des fouilles extensives et systématiques réalisées par time in human history. Direct dates on Achatina shell l’équipe d’Iringa Region Archaeological Project and ostrich eggshell (OES) beads suggest that the earli- (IRAP) révèlent une image complexe de l’utilisation est occupation levels excavated at Mlambalasi, which et de la réutilisation de l'abri sous roche pendant un are associated with human burials, are terminal Pleisto- moment important dans l'histoire de l'humanité. -
Africa from MIS 6-2: the Florescence of Modern Humans
Chapter 1 Africa from MIS 6-2: The Florescence of Modern Humans Brian A. Stewart and Sacha C. Jones Abstract Africa from Marine Isotope Stages (MIS) 6-2 saw Introduction the crystallization of long-term evolutionary processes that culminated in our species’ anatomical form, behavioral The last three decades represent a watershed in our under- florescence, and global dispersion. Over this *200 kyr standing of modern human origins. In the mid-1980s, evo- period, Africa experienced environmental changes on a lutionary genetics established that the most ancient human variety of spatiotemporal scales, from the long-term disap- lineages are African (Cann 1988; Vigilant et al. 1991). Since pearance of whole deserts and forests to much higher then, steady streams of genetic, paleontological and archae- frequency, localized shifts. The archaeological, fossil, and ological insights have converged into a torrent of evidence genetic records increasingly suggest that environmental that Africa is our species’ evolutionary home, both biological variability profoundly affected early human population sizes, and behavioral. When these changes occurred, however, densities, interconnectedness, and distribution across the remains less well understood, and much less so how and why. African landscape – that is, population dynamics. At the Where within Africa modern humans and our suite of same time, recent advances in anthropological theory predict behaviors developed is also problematic. One thing seems that such paleodemographic changes were central to struc- clear: the changes that shaped our species and its behavioral turing the very records we are attempting to comprehend. repertoire were gradual, rooted deeper in the Pleistocene than The book introduced by this chapter represents a first previously imagined. -
The Middle to Later Stone Age Transition at Panga Ya Saidi, in the Tropical Coastal Forest Of
1 The Middle to Later Stone Age transition at Panga ya Saidi, in the tropical coastal forest of 2 eastern Africa 3 4 Abstract 5 The Middle to Later Stone Age transition is a critical period of human behavioral change that 6 has been variously argued to pertain to the emergence of modern cognition, substantial 7 population growth, and major dispersals of Homo sapiens within and beyond Africa. 8 However, there is little consensus about when the transition occurred, the geographic 9 patterning of its emergence, or even how it is manifested in stone tool technology that is used 10 to define it. Here we examine a long sequence of lithic technological change at the cave site 11 of Panga ya Saidi, Kenya, that spans the Middle and Later Stone Age and includes human 12 occupations in each of the last five Marine Isotope Stages. In addition to the stone artifact 13 technology, Panga ya Saidi preserves osseous and shell artifacts enabling broader 14 considerations of the covariation between different spheres of material culture. Several 15 environmental proxies contextualize the artifactual record of human behavior at Panga ya 16 Saidi. We compare technological change between the Middle and Later Stone Age to on-site 17 paleoenvironmental manifestations of wider climatic fluctuations in the Late Pleistocene. The 18 principal distinguishing feature of Middle from Later Stone Age technology at Panga ya Saidi 19 is the preference for fine-grained stone, coupled with the creation of small flakes 20 (miniaturization). Our review of the Middle to Later Stone Age transition elsewhere in 21 eastern Africa and across the continent suggests that this broader distinction between the two 22 periods is in fact widespread. -
Africa from MIS 6–2: Population Dynamics and Paleoenvironments Sacha C
Africa from MIS 6–2: Population Dynamics and Paleoenvironments Sacha C. Jones and Brian A. Stewart (eds.) Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Series, Dordrecht: Springer, 2016, 424 pp. (hardback), £103.99. ISBN-13: 9789401775205. Reviewed by DEBORAH I. OLSZEWSKI Department of Anthropology, Penn Museum, 3260 South Street, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; [email protected] his volume includes papers from a conference held at ests, they ask if such contexts were biogeographical corri- Tthe McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research in dors or instead might have operated as barriers to move- 2010. The aim of the conference was to examine the his- ment. In particular, rainforests were patchy spots across tories of populations on the African continent through the the landscape during arid periods, and likely not refugia, use of a variety of data sets—archaeology, genetics, pa- partly due to significant deficiencies in food resources for leoenvironments, and paleontology—to reach a more nu- hominins. anced understanding of hominin skeletal and behavioral Part I: The first three chapters in Part I (Coasts) are evolution, how populations were spatially distributed studies from the coastlines of southern Africa. Chapter 2, across Africa, and the impact of climatic factors on group by A.S. Carr, B.M. Chase, and A. Mackay, focuses on the size and movement. The conference participants sought to Middle Stone Age (MSA) in the southern part of South position data from Africa to aid in the construction of theo- Africa. It is an overview of the archaeology in the period retical frameworks and to benefit from frameworks devel- from 170–55 kya, which is derived primarily from cave and oped elsewhere. -
Border Cave and the Beginning of the Later Stone Age in South Africa
Border Cave and the beginning of the Later Stone Age in South Africa Paola Villaa,b,c,1, Sylvain Sorianod, Tsenka Tsanovae, Ilaria Deganof, Thomas F. G. Highamg, Francesco d’Erricoc,h, Lucinda Backwelli,j, Jeannette J. Lucejkof, Maria Perla Colombinif, and Peter B. Beaumontk aUniversity of Colorado Museum, Boulder, CO 80309-0265; bSchool of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, iBernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research, School of Geosciences, and jInstitute for Human Evolution, University of the Witwatersrand, Wits 2050, South Africa; cCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)–Unité Mixte de Recherche 5199 De la Préhistoire à l’Actuel: Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie (PACEA), Université Bordeaux 1, 33405 Talence, France; dArchéologies et Sciences de l’Antiquité, Université Paris Ouest, CNRS, 92023 Nanterre, France; eMax-Planck- Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany; fDipartimento di Chimica, Università di Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; gResearch Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, England; hInstitute for Archaeology, History, Cultural and Religious Studies, University of Bergen, 5020 Bergen, Norway; and kArchaeology Department, McGregor Museum, Kimberley 8300, South Africa Edited* by Richard G. Klein, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved June 26, 2012 (received for review February 14, 2012) The transition from the Middle Stone Age (MSA) to the Later Stone jects], together with high frequencies of microliths made by the Age (LSA) in South Africa was not associated with the appearance of bipolar technique and hafted with pitch, and of scaled pieces mark anatomically modern humans and the extinction of Neandertals, as the beginning of the LSA (early LSA or ELSA) at Border Cave. -
Tryon CV, Page 2, 9/16/19
9/16/19 Curriculum Vitae CHRISTIAN ALEXANDER TRYON Professor, Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut 354 Mansfield Rd., Storrs, CT 06269 Tel: 860-486-2137, Email: [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. (with distinction), Anthropology, U. of Connecticut, Storrs, 2003. M.A., Anthropology, U. of Connecticut, Storrs, 2000. B.A. (Honors), Anthropology and English, cum laude, U. of Connecticut, Storrs, 1996. POSITIONS HELD 2019-present Professor. Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut. 2017-2019 John L. Loeb Associate Professor of the Social Sciences. Department of Anthropology, Harvard University. 2013-2017 Assistant Professor. Department of Anthropology, Harvard University. 2008-2013 Assistant Professor. Department of Anthropology, New York University. 2005-present Smithsonian Research Collaborator, Human Origins Program, Department of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution. 2005-2007 Visiting Assistant Professor and Assistant Professorial Lecturer. Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University. 2004-2005 Smithsonian Postdoctoral Fellow, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution. 2004 Fondation Fyssen Postdoctoral Fellow, Centre d’études Préhistoire, Antiquité et Moyen-Age (CEPAM), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS),Valbonne-Sophia Antipolis, France. 2002 Lecturer, Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut. RESEARCH INTERESTS The archaeological, evolutionary, and geological context of early Homo sapiens, biogeography, human dispersals across and out of Africa, the Paleolithic/Stone Age archaeology of East Africa (Kenya and Tanzania) and the Mediterranean basin (France, Turkey, Israel, and Lebanon), stone tool technology and raw material provenance analysis, geochronology, geochemical analysis and correlation of volcanic ash deposits using an electron microprobe, natural and cultural formation processes of the archeological and paleontological record. RESEARCH GRANTS 2018 Harvard University’s Radcliffe Institute, C.A. -
Early Evidence of San Material Culture Represented by Organic Artifacts from Border Cave, South Africa
Early evidence of San material culture represented by organic artifacts from Border Cave, South Africa Francesco d’Erricoa,b,1, Lucinda Backwellc,d, Paola Villaa,e,f, Ilaria Deganog, Jeannette J. Lucejkog, Marion K. Bamfordc, Thomas F. G. Highamh, Maria Perla Colombinig, and Peter B. Beaumonti aCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5199, De la Préhistoire à l’Actuel: Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie, Université Bordeaux I, F-33405 Talence, France; bInstitute for Archaeology, History, Cultural Studies and Religion, University of Bergen, 5020 Bergen, Norway; cBernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research, School of Geosciences, dInstitute for Human Evolution, and fSchool of Geography, Archaeology, and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Wits 2050, South Africa; eUniversity of Colorado Museum, Boulder, CO 80309-0265; gDipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, Università di Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; hResearch Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, England; and iArchaeology Department, McGregor Museum, Kimberley 8300, South Africa Edited by Richard G. Klein, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved June 6, 2012 (received for review March 11, 2012) Recent archaeological discoveries have revealed that pigment use, to a number of caveats. First, Neanderthals exhibited many com- beads, engravings, and sophisticated stone and bone tools were plex behaviors (pigment use, funerary practices, complex hafting already present in southern Africa 75,000 y ago. Many of these techniques, wood-working, personal ornamentation, and bone tool artifacts disappeared by 60,000 y ago, suggesting that modern manufacture) before or at the very moment of contact with modern behavior appeared in the past and was subsequently lost before humans (13, 15–18). -
A Brief Overview of Major Pleistocene Palaeoart Sites in Sub-Saharan Africa
CLOTTES J. (dir.) 2012. — L’art pléistocène dans le monde / Pleistocene art of the world / Arte pleistoceno en el mundo Actes du Congrès IFRAO, Tarascon-sur-Ariège, septembre 2010 – Symposium « Art pléistocène en Afrique » A Brief overview of major Pleistocene palaeoart sites in Sub-Saharan Africa Peter B. BEAUMONT and Robert G. BEDNARIK Abstract A literature survey shows that there are only seven sites in Africa south of the Sahara that have as yet produced multiple rock art objects of Pleistocene age, of which all are fortuitous, mobiliary finds, with the exception of the Chifubwa research in 1951. This sparse data-base does however provide evidence for figurative art by ~32.000 years ago at Apollo 11, of complex engravings in the 70.000- 100.000 range at Blombos, of simple engraved patterns before 270.000 BP at Wonderwerk, and of c. 400.000-years-old cupules at Nchwaneng. Northern Cape occurrences before then consist only of specularite and haematite manuports that range back to c. 0.9 million year, which suggests that symbolism probably arose in sub-Saharan Africa with the slightly earlier advent of Homo rhodesiensis / archaic Homo sapiens. In 1971 radiocarbon dates of up to >49.000 years ago were obtained for strata lying well above the lip of a shallow (27cm deep) grave with the remains of a 4-6 month-old modern human infant and a perforated seashell pendant (Vogel & Beaumont 1972; de Villiers 1973; Beaumont at al. 1978) that had been found during previous fieldwork at Border Cave in South Africa (Cooke et al.1945).