Schmenk, Colin R -DNR
From: Kevin Bartel
Good Morning Colin,
Thank you for reaching out and for the phone conversation on Tuesday Afternoon.
The supplementary Site investigation completed by Cedar Corporation in Jan 2020 did mention a deed restriction. This was based on the assumption there was a deed restriction based on previous site investigation work completed for the Village. However, when preparing the post closure modification, Cedar did not find any indication or evidence of a deed restriction and that wording was left out of the PCM and the PCM then focused on the cap requirement. o I think we are both in agreement that there is no Deed Restriction. Cedar Corporation removed the upper 4 feet of soil direct contamination. The areas where the contamination was removed were capped with gravel and replaced with gravel. Based on historic well reports from the area such as well # CA2206, CA2178, and CA2176 (for example) which show groundwater at a depth of 45‐60 feet, we believe the wink mart site sits on a perched aquifer. o Based on the Water‐Table and Aquifer maps of Calumet County, WI by Gotkowitz and Gaffield 2006 (attached), the regional groundwater at the wink mart site falls 840 ‐860 feet. The approximate elevation of the wink mart site is 900ft. . The aquifer susceptibility map also indicates a low aquifer‐susceptibility index to the sand and gravel aquifer based on the location of the wink mart site. . With there being 28‐48 feet of separation between the regional groundwater and the impacted soils there would be little to no risk of soil to groundwater infiltration.
Thank you for reaching out and for the phone conversation on Tuesday Afternoon.
Kevin Bartel Staff Geologist Cedar Corporation 1695 Bellevue St | Bellevue | WI | 54311 Office: 920-491-9081 | TF: 800-472-7372 [email protected] www.cedarcorp.com | LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter
This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and confidential information from Cedar Corporation. Please visit our website at http://www.cedarcorp.com/disclaimer for more details.
From: Schmenk, Colin R ‐DNR
Good afternoon Kevin,
1 As we discussed on the phone a few minutes ago, I am the project manager working on the Post‐Closure Modification (PCM) request submitted for the WI DOT Wink Mart (Winkler Oil) case. I will be bringing the request for peer review on Thursday. I wanted to follow up with you on a couple of items regarding your submittal. There is reference to a deed restriction for the surface cover in place on the property in your submittal, but I have no record of this in my file. At the time this site would have closed everything should have been recorded on the DNR GIS database. o You indicated that you did not find any record of one either so I am fairly confident that there isn’t a deed restriction on this site. The purpose of the PCM request is to remove the continuing obligation for maintenance of the cover to prevent direct contact exposure. There are cap requirements for both prevention of direct contact and soil to groundwater infiltration so if we removed the cap requirement for direct contact it would still apply to prevent soil to groundwater infiltration. o If you wish to have the requirement for the impervious cover removed as well, respond to this email with a justification for removing the requirement for an impervious cap to prevent soil to groundwater infiltration. o As discussed, the area excavated was not recapped with an impervious surface. Rather, crushed stone is the new surface cover in this area. The historic file indicates that local groundwater was historically 4‐9 ft bgs and some of the recent boring logs indicate saturation at around 8‐12 feet. In the Interpretations and Conclusions section of the request Cedar Corp states that there is 28‐48 feet of separation between impacted soils and regional groundwater, which was estimated to be about 50 ft bgs. There are no references in the report to potential impacts to the shallower local groundwater. o You told me you felt that the shallow groundwater was a perched water table and that the true water table is deeper.
Let me know if I captured any of our conversation incorrectly. Thanks for talking with me and I look forward to your response.
Regards, We are committed to service excellence. Visit our survey at http://dnr.wi.gov/customersurvey to evaluate how I did.
Colin Schmenk Hydrogeologist – Remediation & Redevelopment Program Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 2984 Shawano Ave Green Bay, WI 54313‐6727 Phone #: (920) 510‐9482 [email protected]
dnr.wi.gov
This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and confidential information from Cedar Corporation. Please visit our website at http://www.cedarcorp.com/disclaimer for more details.
2 Water-Table and Aquifer-Susceptibility Maps of Calumet County, Wisconsin
88O 15’ 88O 7’30” 88O 15’ 88O 7’30” Construction and interpretation of the aquifer-susceptibility map 88O 22’30” 88O 22’30” 66 BROWN CO 67 R20E 66 BROWN CO 67 R20E Madeline B. Gotkowitz and Stephen J. Gaffi eld 65 R18E OUTAGAMIE CO R19E 65 R18E OUTAGAMIE CO R19E We constructed an aquifer-susceptibility map for the uppermost aquifers in the Darboy Darboy county; we did not construct a susceptibility map for the sandstone aquifer because 42 KK D 57 402 000mN 42 KK D 57 402 000mN 2006 780 55 Kankapot Dundas 55 Kankapot Dundas it is well protected from land-use activities by the Maquoketa–Sinnipee aquitard. Appleton Appleton We considered the sand and gravel aquifer to be the uppermost aquifer where the N N P 760 K P K Silurian dolomite aquifer is absent because most domestic water wells in these areas Miscellaneous Map 56 + 780 + are completed in sand and gravel seams within the glacial deposits. We considered /10 + /10 + 740 the Silurian dolomite aquifer the uppermost aquifer everywhere this dolomite is Creek 820 Creek + 800 PP PP present in the county because most wells in this area are completed in the dolomite. 10 10 + / / However, in a few areas of the county some domestic wells are completed in glacial Forest Junction Forest Junction INTRODUCTION 760 + M + M deposits overlying the Silurian dolomite (for example, along the North Branch of /10 114 840 /10 114 The Calumet County Board of Supervisors sponsored the Calumet County + the Manitowoc River). In these areas, we mapped the susceptibility of the Silurian Waverly Beach BRILLION Waverly Beach BRILLION Groundwater Project to provide information pertinent to protecting the quality of aquifer, rather than the overlying sand and gravel deposits, because many wells are Utowanta Beach + Utowanta Beach groundwater resources in the county. These maps and fi gures are products of this T20N T20N T20N T20N completed in the dolomite. The extent of each aquifer shown on the susceptibility project; they are based upon our compilation and analysis of geologic and hydrologic 114 WOODVILLE 820 114 WOODVILLE map is based on our interpretation of available well construction reports and geologic data. The maps illustrate signifi cant characteristics of the regional groundwater + North North logs and the map of the Silurian aquifer presented by Sherrill (1979). fl ow system and its susceptibility to contamination from human activities. The 780 /10 /10 + information presented here indicates that large parts of the groundwater system in Highland Beach Highland Beach Susceptibility of the sand and gravel aquifer Calumet County currently used for drinking-water supplies are moderately or highly HARRISON + HARRISON We considered two factors in determining the susceptibility of the sand and gravel susceptible to contamination, underscoring the need for sound planning to maintain 820 aquifer to contamination: the type of glacial deposits present (based on mapping by a safe drinking-water supply. + Brillion Brillion Sherwood + B Sherwood B B.J. Socha, 2004, written communication) and the depth to the water table (derived St John Branch St John Branch from the water-table map). These factors are signifi cant because fi ne-grained material THE GROUNDWATER SYSTEM 800 114 114 (such as silt or clay) at the ground surface tends to reduce and/or slow the transport + + The water cycle is a continuous cycling of water through the Earth’s atmosphere, + + of contaminants through the subsurface. The depth to the water table is important oceans, glaciers, lakes, rivers, soil, and rock (fi g. 1). Precipitation that reaches the land Round Round HIGH CLIFF + BRILLION STATE HIGH CLIFF BRILLION STATE because the greater the distance from the land surface to the water table, the longer + + + Lake Lake surface can fl ow downhill as overland runoff, evaporate, transpire through plants, STATE PARK + Grass STATE PARK Grass + + Hilbert Hilbert the amount of time available for contaminants to degrade within the unsaturated WILDLIFE AREA + Lake Boot WILDLIFE AREA Lake Boot or infi ltrate the ground. Water that infi ltrates the ground percolates through pore 41 + Junction 41 41 Junction 41 zone. Areas of this aquifer mapped as having high susceptibility consist of relatively + + Lake + Lake spaces and cracks, or fractures, in soil and rock. Where these pores and fractures are + + permeable deposits and shallow depths to groundwater. In areas mapped as having completely fi lled with water, the material is saturated. 940 114 + Manitowoc 114 Manitowoc + + low susceptibility, the sand and gravel aquifer lies beneath fi ner-grained materials + + + + + + Hilbert Hilbert and the water table is deeper. The water table is the surface formed by the top of the saturated zone, where hydraulic Harrison + + Becker Harrison Becker + + + + Lake Lake pressure in the pores is equal to atmospheric pressure. Groundwater is the water + The thickness of the deposits overlying an aquifer is also a factor that affects the rate Dorns Faro Springs BB + 44O 7’30” Dorns Faro Springs BB 44O 7’30” contained in the saturated zone beneath the water table. Above the water table, where Beach + + Beach of contaminant transport to the aquifer. However, in Calumet County, some wells + JJ JJ 960 55 114 55 114 pores and fractures are fi lled completely with air or with some air and some water, is 44O 7’30” + + + 44O 7’30” constructed in the sand and gravel aquifer are completed in shallow sand seams 860 the unsaturated zone. The amount of precipitation that infi ltrates the soil and reaches + + Potter Potter + + and some are completed deeper within the deposits. In making this map, we did not the saturated zone is an important factor in determining the elevation of the water T19N + + T19N 57 Y 57 Y consider the thickness of deposits overlying the sand or gravel because it is specifi c to + + table, which fl uctuates seasonally and from one year to another. + + + each well and could not be mapped reliably for the purposes of this project. RANTOUL + T19N RANTOUL T19N 840 + + + In Calumet County, 29 to 32 inches of precipitation fall on the ground surface during O + + O In determining the sand and gravel aquifer susceptibility, we assigned the two factors EE + River+ EE River + 880 + an average year. Approximately 70 to 75 percent of this amount cycles back to the + + an equal amount of importance. A grid of 10 meter by 10 meter cells was overlaid + + Rockaway Beach + Rockaway Beach atmosphere by evaporation and transpiration by plants (Hindall and Borman, 1974). G G on the county map. Each cell was assigned a value of 1 to 5, with 5 being the most 920 + + The remainder either fl ows as runoff on the land surface to streams and lakes or + vulnerable, for each of the two categories. The values were summed for each cell; the + + infi ltrates through soil or rock to the water table, where it recharges the groundwater A + A 940 + + + higher scores indicated greater aquifer susceptibility. The edges of the resulting grid system. Many factors, such as topography, vegetation, rainfall intensity, and soil and + + Creek + + Creek of susceptibility rankings were smoothed so that the regions of aquifer susceptibility St Catherines 900 Killsnake + + St Catherines Killsnake rock type, affect the amount of precipitation that reaches the groundwater system. B + B Bay Bay were mapped at a level of detail similar to the level of accuracy of the inputs to this
+ WINNEBAGO CO For example, in areas where the land surface is covered extensively by pavement E WINNEBAGO CO E + + assessment. Mill Brant + + Mill Brant E E + E E
(such as parking lots and roadways), stormwater runoff to surface water is increased 800 Stockbridge Stockbridge MANITOWOC CO and groundwater recharge is decreased. MANITOWOC CO + Susceptibility of the Silurian dolomite aquifer N N The susceptibility of the Silurian aquifer refl ects the potential for rapid contaminant Sunset Beach + Sunset Beach + transport from the ground surface to wells through fractures in the dolomite. To CHILTON + CHILTON 40 + 40 40 40 N River N River construct the map of this aquifer, we considered two factors: the thickness of deposits STOCKBRIDGE 960 STOCKBRIDGE 760 + + + KILLSNAKE STATE KILLSNAKE STATE overlying the dolomite aquifer and the type of glacial deposits overlying the aquifer I + + + 800 I + + (mapped by B.J. Socha, 2004, written communication). Areas that have low aquifer + + WILDLIFE AREA WILDLIFE AREA + + + susceptibility have a thick layer of fi ne-grained deposits overlying the Silurian W W + + dolomite. Relatively permeable sediments at the ground surface and shallow depths + + Y Y Precipitation 1000 ++ + to bedrock characterize areas where the dolomite aquifer is mapped as having high Kloten Gravesville Kloten Gravesville F + Stony + River F Stony River susceptibility. An additional category shown for this aquifer includes areas where the E Chilton + E Chilton Infiltration Manitowoc Manitowoc + depth to the dolomite is less than 5 feet. In these areas, groundwater in the dolomite + + T18N T18N 980 + aquifer is extremely vulnerable to contamination because little soil or sediment K + + K Evaporation Transpiration T18N + C + + T18N C buffers the aquifer from contaminants applied at the ground surface. These areas Percolation + CHARLESTOWN /151 CHARLESTOWN /151 Runoff 820 + + 151 151 of shallow bedrock were identifi ed from the SSURGO database of soils information A + / + A / Konsin + Brook + Konsin Brook (Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1998–2004). Water table Beach Beach Unsaturated + T T Well + Branch Hayton Marsh Branch Hayton Marsh zone L Quinney + L Quinney + + + The depth to groundwater was not considered in constructing the susceptibility of 55 + + +Pine 55 Pine Groundwater O O this aquifer because of the extensive fractures present within the Silurian dolomite. Runoff + + 44 00’ 44 00’ Saturated + 57 + 57 Groundwater + + + + Fractures provide a direct and rapid pathway for contaminants to reach saturated zone flow Groundwater flow O 960 + O 44 00’ + + 44 00’ bedrock. Natural attenuation of contaminants, which typically occurs in unsaturated Lake to lakes and streams +920 + + + + materials above the water table, may not take place where fractures provide a G + + G 900 + + + pathway for rapid contaminant migration. (747) + + Creek (747) Creek + + South + South Winnebago Point + + + Winnebago Point + In contrast to our determination of the susceptibility of the sand and gravel aquifer, + 860 Figure 1. The water cycle (modifi ed from Dunne and Leopold, 1978). + + we did not assign equal weight to the two factors considered in determining the + Meggers Meggers susceptibility of the Silurian aquifer. For this aquifer, the thickness of materials + 920 + Charlesburg + Charlesburg Jericho 860 Jericho 309 000mN Brothertown + + + 39 309 000mN Brothertown 39 overlying the dolomite in each 10 meter by 10 meter cell was given twice as much + + + + Groundwater fl ow and discharge + signifi cance as the type of material overlying it. The thickness of the overlying BROTHERTOWN T BROTHERTOWN T An aquifer is geologic material (such as sand and gravel deposits or a bedrock layer) 900 deposits is a crucial factor in this setting because it provides a buffer between + + that is saturated and yields water to wells. Hydraulic conductivity is a measure of + + + contaminant transport from the ground surface to the very rapid travel times that + Maple Heights Maple Heights an aquifer’s ability to transmit groundwater; it is dependent on the nature of the 820 + X X + H New Holstein + H New Holstein occur once contamination reaches a fractured rock aquifer. Assigning this factor twice + + + material through which the water is fl owing. Large pores or fractures can hold + + 880 the weight results in a greater extent of the aquifer mapped with higher susceptibility. T17N H + + T17N H more water than small ones, but for water to fl ow effectively within an aquifer, + + The type of material overlying the Silurian dolomite does not vary signifi cantly /151 + /151 these pores or fractures must be connected. An aquitard is a rock or sediment layer 780 C G C G across this region; it is primarily clayey silt or clayey, silty sand. This relative lack + consisting of low conductivity material (such as shale or clay) that restricts the fl ow + + of variation suggests that the type of surfi cial material will not result in large spatial + + T17N T17N + + of groundwater and yields very little water to wells. Confi ned aquifers underlie R19E + R19E variations in the susceptibility of the dolomite aquifer, but the thickness of these 605 000mE 66 NEW HOLSTEIN 605 000mE 66 NEW HOLSTEIN aquitards; unconfi ned aquifers are at, or close to, the ground surface. The potentiometric R18E FOND DU LAC CO + + R18E FOND DU LAC CO 88O 22’30” 88O 15’ 88O 22’30” 88O 15’ materials, which does vary signifi cantly across the region, will have a greater impact surface represents the water pressure in a confi ned aquifer; that is, the elevation to 960 57 57 on aquifer susceptibility. which water will rise in wells completed in that aquifer. The water in wells completed J J Explanation + Aquifer-Susceptibility Index in an unconfi ned aquifer will rise to the elevation of the water table. + Sand and gravel 149 aquifer 149 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Sand and gravel aquifer Silurian aquifer The Calumet County Board of Supervisors and the Wisconsin Department of Contours of equal elevation of the water table. Stream, dashed where ephemeral + Kiel+ Kiel Each contour line on the water-table elevation map (shown right) connects points of + 149 149 Natural Resources Bureau of Drinking Water and Groundwater funded this work. equal water-table elevation. The natural direction of groundwater fl ow is in response 840 Datum is mean sea level. Contour interval is 20 ft. R R 940 Low Low Danielle Cassidy and Kurt K. Zeiler compiled data for the project. Ken Pabich of to gravity, from areas of higher water-table elevation to lower water-table elevation, Approximate locations of surface-water divides + + KIEL MARSH KIEL MARSH the Calumet County Land Information Offi ce, Eugene McLeod of Calumet County + A A generally perpendicular to lines of equal water-table elevation. Arrows on the map + Well completed in sand and gravel aquifer + STATE WILDLIFE AREA Silurian STATE WILDLIFE AREA Moderate Moderate aquifer Land and Water Conservation Department, Kenneth R. Bradbury and John W. Attig indicate the general direction of shallow groundwater fl ow across the county, from Approximate locations of groundwater divides + + Sheboygan Sheboygan of the Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, and Jeffrey Helmuth of + St Anna + St Anna high to low water-table elevation. Well completed in shallow dolomite aquifer + High High the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources reviewed these maps and text. We R20E R20E Lakes and ponds; where shown, value is 607 000mE SHEYBOYGAN CO 607 000mE SHEYBOYGAN CO (747) thank them for their thorough assessments and suggestions, which helped us to O O Groundwater fl ows through aquifers from recharge to discharge areas. The uplands, Approximate direction of regional shallow groundwater flow average stage in feet above mean sea level 88 7’30” Highest (areas of thin soil) 88 7’30” signifi cantly improve these products. where the water-table elevation is higher, tend to be areas where water infi ltrates the Scale 1:100,000 ground and recharges groundwater. In Wisconsin and other parts of the Midwest, 1240 1 3 56 surface-water bodies such as lowland streams, lakes, and wetlands are typically SOURCES OF INFORMATION areas of groundwater discharge. Such discharge occurs when the nearby water-table KILOMETERS 1240 1 3 5 Conlon, T.D., 1998, Hydrogeology and simulation of groundwater fl ow in the elevation is higher than the elevation of the surface-water body, and groundwater Water-table elevation map of Calumet County, Wisconsin Susceptibility map of the uppermost aquifers in Calumet County, Wisconsin sandstone aquifer, northeastern Wisconsin: U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources MILES fl ows into the surface water. Most rivers and streams have some water fl owing in Investigations Report 97-4096, 60 p. them even during extended periods of drought because they are fed by groundwater. Dunne, Thomas, and Leopold, L.B., 1978, Water in Environmental Planning: W.H. An example of fl ow from recharge to discharge areas can be seen on the map Freeman and Company, 818 p. along the ridge northeast of Brothertown. There, the elevation of the water table is approximately 1,000 ft. Arrows on the map illustrate that shallow groundwater 650 Hindall, S.M., and Borman, R.G., 1974, Water resources of Wisconsin, Lower OUTAGAMIE CO BROWN CO fl ows to the west, where groundwater discharges to Lake Winnebago, which has an A OUTAGAMIE CO BROWN CO Wisconsin River Basin: U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Investigations Atlas HA- elevation of 747 ft. The arrows on the water-table elevation map show that shallow R18E R19E R20E CALUMET CO A 479, scale 1:1,000,000.
WINNEBAGO CO groundwater also fl ows from the ridgetop to the east, discharging to Stony Brook and CALUMET CO A’ MANITOWOC CO A’ dolomite A 360500 the South Branch of the Manitowoc River. T20N (Sinnipee Group) 600 625 900 HWY 55 900 shale Krohelski, J.T., 1986, Hydrogeology and ground-water use and quality, Brown
HWY 32N
80006
80393
710556
80402
81113 (Maquoketa Fm)
80017 800 80018 800 County, Wisconsin: Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey Information Springs are natural points of groundwater discharge. In western Calumet County, 700 700 Circular 57, 42 p. shallow groundwater discharging through fractures in the dolomite feeds the many 650 600 600 600 o springs found along the Niagara Escarpment (a steep bluff formed by the exposed g a T19N Mudrey, M.G., Jr., Brown, B.A., and Greenberg, J.K., 1982, Bedrock geology map of 500 500 b 700 edge, or outcrop, of Silurian dolomite). e n Wisconsin: Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, scale 1:1,000,000. n 400 400 i
W 300 300 e 575 Water wells are manmade points of groundwater discharge. Pumping lowers k 750 a
Elevation (in ft above sea level) Muldoon, M.A., Simo, J.A., and Bradbury, K.R., 2001, Correlation of hydraulic L 200 200 CO MANITOWOC the water level in a well, inducing fl ow to the well from the surrounding aquifer. B B’ o
MANITOWOC CO MANITOWOC conductivity with stratigraphy in a fractured-dolomite aquifer, northeastern g T18N o Pumping can cause a drop in the level of the water table, called a cone of depression, 100 100 a g b Wisconsin, USA: Hydrogeology Journal, v. 9, p. 570–583. a e 550 around the well. The relatively low volume of groundwater that is currently 0 0 b n e 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 n n
Elevation (in ft above sea level) withdrawn from shallow wells in Calumet County does not cause cones of Elevation (in ft-100 above sea level) -100 i n National Research Council, 1993, Ground water vulnerability assessment, contamination
i depression large enough to be seen at the scale of this water-table map. However, -200 -200 W T17N W potential under conditions of uncertainty: National Academy Press, 204 p. e Figure 5. Groundwater elevation in the sandstone aquifer in northern Calumet County, pumping from deep wells results in a cone of depression in the potentiometric e dolomite k -300 -300 k
a measured in monitoring well 80006 from 1952 to 1996. Location and depth of this a
surface of the sandstone aquifer in Calumet County, as discussed in the next section, L Cross-section index L (Silurian) -400 -400 monitoring well are shown in fi gure 2A; its location is also shown in fi gure 4. The data were Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1998–2004, Soil Survey Geographic Geology and groundwater availability.
compiled from records maintained by the U.S. Geological Survey (2004). (SSURGO) database for Calumet County: U.S. Department of Agriculture, available WINNEBAGO CO WINNEBAGO WINNEBAGO CO WINNEBAGO online at
80146 the highest elevations of the water table. Shallow groundwater fl ows away from Stony Brook on many factors. Some of these factors are intrinsic to the natural setting, such as 1000 1000 elevation of water table in upper aquifer Line of equal
80012 groundwater divides, toward groundwater discharge areas. Groundwater divides do 80051 Silurian dolomite aquifer the type and thickness of soil and geologic material overlying the aquifer, the depth
CALUMET CO Manitowoc River potentiometric head
80008 900 Lake Winnebago 900 U.S. Geological Survey [1974–84], Digital raster graphics of topographic quadrangles
MANITOWOC CO
Manitowoc River not necessarily coincide with surface-water divides, although the major groundwater 80045 Silurian dolomite direction of fl ow in upper aquifer SHEBOYGAN CO Contour interval = 50 ft SHEBOYGAN CO to the water table, and the type of sediment or rock that makes up the aquifer. For 800 800 700 (7.5-minute series), Calumet County, Wisconsin: U.S. Geological Survey, information divides in Calumet County are along or relatively close to surface-water divides. Datum is sea level example, aquifers that are overlain by a thick deposit of clay are much less vulnerable 700 700 Dashed where inferred available online at < http://topomaps.usgs.gov/drg/>. The locations of groundwater divides on this map are approximate and may change Figure 3. Bedrock map of Calumet County (adapted from Mudrey to contamination than an aquifer consisting of fractured dolomite rock overlain by a 600 600 Maquoketa–Sinnipee aquitard and others, 1982; Sherrill, 1979). thin layer of sandy soil. Properties that affect aquifer susceptibility are not typically as the water table rises and falls in response to periods of rainfall and drought. Location of measured well U.S. Geological Survey, 2004, Ground-water data for Wisconsin: U.S. Geological 500 500 Maquoketa Formation Signifi cant amounts of groundwater pumping from wells drilled near divides may uniform over the lateral extent of an aquifer, and areas within an aquifer may have Survey, available online at
300 300 Figure 4. Potentiometric surface of the sandstone aquifer in Calumet County. U.S. Geological Survey, 2001, National elevation dataset: U.S. Geological Survey, The groundwater divides in Calumet County can be used to identify the areas in 200 200 Sandstone aquifer Other factors that infl uence aquifer susceptibility, such as the type of contaminant available online at
In other areas of Calumet County, the glacial deposits consist of clay that has low Maquoketa–Sinnipee aquitard. The Maquoketa Formation and Sinnipee Group level data from deep wells in Calumet County are scarce, and the potentiometric table elevation on ridgetops. originate in rocks and minerals, and they dissolve in the groundwater. In western is estimated from parameters such as depth to bedrock and depth to groundwater. cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, University of Wisconsin–Extension, hydraulic conductivity. Although the clay may be saturated, groundwater fl ows underlie the Silurian dolomite across most of the county (fi g. 2) and compose a surface changes as the large volume of pumping from the aquifer continues. Data Calumet County, concentrations of naturally occurring sulfate in groundwater from Therefore, assigning rankings of low, moderate, and high susceptibility is a subjective Cooperative Extension. University of Wisconsin–Extension provides equal opportunities in through it at very slow rates (as little as 1 inch per year). These clay deposits regionally extensive aquitard. These units consist of low hydraulic conductivity collected from a monitoring well in northern Calumet County demonstrate that the This map is intended for use at the scale of publication (1:100,000). It is a regional the sandstone aquifer are as high as 900 parts per million (Ryling, 1961). Although process and is ultimately a matter of professional judgment. The National Research employment and programming, including Title IX and ADA requirements. If you need this form an aquitard that does not readily yield water to wells and restricts the fl ow shale and dolomite layers that restrict the vertical fl ow of groundwater and rate of decline of the potentiometric surface in the sandstone aquifer in this area is interpretation of the water table and may not be suffi cient for use at site-specifi c sulfate in drinking water is not considered a risk to human health, high levels of Council (1993) presented a thorough discussion of issues related to groundwater- information in an alternative format, contact the Offi ce of Equal Oppor tunity and Diversity of groundwater to underlying bedrock. generally yield little water to wells. approximately 2.5 feet per year (fi g. 5). scales. Information used from the well constructor’s reports was not fi eld verifi ed. sulfate in well water may be unpalatable to well users. susceptibility assessments. Programs or the Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey (telephone 608/262.1705).