DOCSLIB.ORG

San Mateo County Today 745000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Mateo County Today 745000 COUNTY FOCUS San Mateo County Today $91,300 70% 745,000 Median family income Drive alone Residents 11% carpool 68% Increase 5.4% 9% take transit since 1960 Unemployment 3% walk 1% bike rate 5% telecommute mployment ransportation POPULATION E T 1% other ? IMES ROM IMES T 4% Of miles traveled on San Mateo T 26 f 59% Minute commute Of residents live AND work in highways are affected by congestion to work San Mateo County IC (Compared to an average of San Mateo County exports and imports the Northbound US-101 from Redwood City to ff San Mateo during the evening commute OMMUTE 28 minutes for the entire Bay Area) most workers to and from San Francisco is one of the most congested segments in C OMMUTE OMMUTE RA San Mateo County T C C $1,600 41,000 Median monthly rent Daily Caltrain boardings 70 (+143% since 1991) $836,500 Overall score RANSIT Median home price for all jurisdictions g T 37,000 Best: Foster City at 81 LIC Daily SamTrans boardings 71% Worst: Belmont at 55 b (-30% since 1991) Multifamily permits VEMENT OUSIN U ONDITION in 2013 A Index on a scale of 0 - 100 P H P C Data Sources: Population–California Department of Finance, 2014; Employment–U.S. Census Bureau: American Community Survey, 2013; California Employment Development Department, 2013; Transportation–U.S. Census Bureau: American Community Survey, 2013; Commute Times–U.S. Census Bureau: American Community Survey, 2013; Traffic–Caltrans Performance Monitoring System, 2013; Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 2013; Public Transit–Federal Transit Administration: National Transit Database, 2012; Housing– U.S. Census Bureau: American Community Survey, 2013; Multiple Listing Service Homes Sales Records, 2014; California Homebuilding Foundation/Construction Industry Research Board, 2013; Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 2013 Regional Pavement Condition Report. What are the current trends in San Mateo County? Atherton | Belmont | Brisbane | Burlingame | Colma | Daly City | East Palo Alto | Foster City | Half Moon Bay | Hillsborough | Menlo Park | Millbrae | Pacifica | Portola Valley | Redwood City | San Bruno | San Carlos | San Mateo | South San Francisco | Woodside Understanding what’s happening in San Mateo County now helps us recognize what issues may become most important as we plan for the future. Here’s a brief snapshot of San Mateo County and some key issues to consider for these communities as we update Plan Bay Area. TRANSPORTATION: There are many transportation DIVERSITY: 2.5% of San Mateo County residents options in San Mateo County, but last-mile are African-American, 25.1% are Asian, 25.3% are alternatives remain a challenge in many areas. Latino, 41.9% are White, and 5.2% are other or multiple races. 101 128 Cloverdale 128 29 Healdsburg Calistoga 1 Sonoma Windsor Napa 101 128 505 116 Santa Rosa Dixon 80 12 Sebastopol Yountville 121 29 12 116 COUNTY FOCUS Rohnert Park Vacaville Cotati 113 Napa PDAs in SanSonoma Mateo Fairfield Petaluma 12 Suisun City 116 121 29 12 Rio Vista Locally Nominated PriorityAmerican Canyon Development 680 Solano MarinAreas and Priority Conservation37 Areas 37 San Mateo County is strategically located between Vallejo Priority Development Areas (PDAs) San Francisco and Silicon Valley. The Coast Range 780 Benicia divides the county intoNovato two distinct parts: the bayside Priority Development Areas (PDAs) are locally designated areas within existing communities that provide infill and coast. Ninety percent of development in the county Hercules development opportunities, and are easily accessible is located on the bayside. The communities along the to transit, jobs, shopping and services. 1 bayside of the Peninsula are101 home to Fortune 500 Pinole 4 4 Martinez headquarters, globally significant firms and research Pittsburg Fairfax San 80 Priority Conservation Areas (PCAs) Oakley entities as well as manySan Anselmo charming town centers and Antioch Rafael San Pablo Priority Conservation Areas (PCAs) are regionallyConcord significant open residential neighborhoods.Ross Jobs and housing growth spaces for which there exists a broad consensus for long-term is expected to concentrate in bayside communities, protection and for which publicPleasant and privateHill funds may be invested Richmond Clayton Brentwood which will reduce growthLarkspur pressures on580 the coast and to promote their protection. The purpose for identifying Priority Corte El CerritoConservation Areas is to highlight near-term opportunities allow the county to retain its agricultural, scenic and for land conservation in the San Francisco Bay Area that are Madera Lafayette 4 natural resource areasMill in Valley the hills and coastside. supported by local consensus. Belvedere Albany Orinda Walnut Creek San Mateo County is home to 28 locallyTiburon nominated Contra Berkeley 24 PDAs and 7 PCAs. Sausalito Emeryville 13 Moraga 680 Costa 80 Piedmont Danville A Map of SanSan Mateo CountyOakland PDAs Francisco Alameda 580 San Ramon 205 Legend RAIL SYSTEM 2010 POPULATION 580 Urbanized area Dublin Altamont Corridor Express > 350,000 Open space 1 Downtown San Mateo 580 Amtrak Daly City 238 Priority Development Area (PDA) Oakland Colma Brisbane San Leandro BART Livermore Priority Conservation Area (PCA) New development in this PDA 50,000–350,000 ROADS PleasantonCaltrain Hayward will focus on high-intensity Freeway 280 South Light Rail (Muni & VTA) MajorMinor Road <50,000 commercial projects and transit- 101 Dublin oriented development near the 380 San Francisco Minor Road Cable Car (Muni) 35 San Bruno 880 renovated train incorporating 1 San Francisco Bay Area - Transportation and Land Uses | 3.27.15 238 84 multi-family housing into mixed- 0 10 20 Pacifica Burlingame 92 Miles use developments. Served by both Millbrae Union City Kilometers SamTrans and Caltrain, the area is San Hayward 0 10 20 30 680 Alameda a prime housing opportunity given Mateo 2 Downtown Redwood City its proximity to the train station, Hillsborough Foster City commercial uses, services, and a 101 growing employment center. This vibrant urban PDA has a mix 280 Redwood City of activityNewark centers and building Belmont styles from different decades. It will Menlo 84 become Fremontan entertainment capital, a San Carlos East dense residential neighborhood, a 92 Park destination for shopping and dining, 101 Palo Alto Half Moon 35 82 a cultural center, a major transit Bay Atherton hub, and a dynamic workplace Woodside district. The downtown supports Milpitas Palo Alto 237 small, independent businesses and encourages both civic interaction and 1 Mountain View entertainment. Los Altos Portola Los Altos Hills Sunnyvale Villages of belmont Valley 130 3 280 Santa Clara 35 This PDA is located near the 84 Belmont Caltrain station along Cupertino San Jose the El Camino Real corridor. Santa New development will expand San 87 transportation choices and revitalize Campbell Downtown Belmont to stimulate 9 Saratoga 85 Clara economic development and enhance Mateo livability for residents, workers, and Monte Sereno visitors. 35 Los Gatos 17 101 1 Morgan Hill 1 2 3 152 Gilroy 152 25 COUNTY FOCUS San Mateo Housing What Housing is Being Built? Housing reflects the unique values and lifestyles of a community. Factors that influence types of housing include General Plans, zoning, population growth, household size, job availability, access to transportation, income and the cost of living. Population Jobs Transportation Cost of Living Multifamily Homes grow as Primary Housing Choice in 1,190 housing units permitted San Mateo County in San Mateo County in During the period of expansive growth across the Bay Area over the last 2013. Of these... half-century, most new units were single-family homes. Some parts of the region, by contrast, are shifting more toward multifamily homes, including apartments and duplexes in Priority Development Areas. This is the trend in San Mateo County, with 71 percent of new housing permitted as 840 (71%) were multifamily multifamily homes. Source: California Homebuilding Foundation/Construction Industry Research Board Historical Trends for Housing growth in San Mateo County 9k 6k 3k Number of Permitted Units Number of Permitted 70% of permits are now 0k for multifamily homes 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 across the Bay Area, Single-Family Units compared to Source: California Homebuilding Foundation/Construction Industry Research Board Multifamily Units 40% 25 years ago Source: California Homebuilding Foundation/Construction Industry Research Board.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 2019 TRIVALLEY San Francisco Business Times Publication
    SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS TIMES SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT AUGUST 2, 2019 Leaders of three thriving Tri-Valley companies met at the new City Center complex in San Ramon (from left): Scott Walchek, founder and CEO of Trōv; Ben Hindson, co-founder and CSO of 10x Genomics; Burton Goldfield, president and CEO of TriNet. TRI-VALLEY The heart of the matter Darrell Jobe of Vericool 10 Ken Gitlin of Robert Half 13 Derek Maunus of GILLIG 13 Lauren Moone of Mirador 16 SPONSORS: A Sunset Development Project 2 ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT TRI-VALLEY | THE HEART OF THE MATTER SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS TIMES A relationship aged to perfection. Proudly celebrating 55 years in the Tri-Valley. Fremont Bank is uniquely positioned as the only independent, locally Proud to offer 5 convenient owned, full-service community bank in the San Francisco Bay Area. From Tri-Valley locations: our 55 years of partnering with our Tri-Valley communities, to offering Danville Branch unprecedented access to local decision makers who understand your Pleasanton Branch goals, Fremont Bank is proud to be the Tri-Valley’s trusted financial Livermore Branch partner. San Ramon Branch Dublin Branch Call or stop by one of our Tri-Valley Branches to experience The Bay Area’s Premier Community Bank for yourself. (800) 359-BANK (2265) | www.fremontbank.com Equal Housing Lender | Member FDIC | NMLS #478471 | LCOM-0277-0719 AUGUST 2, 2019 ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT 3 Talent, innovation and heart drive success in the Tri-Valley ositioned at the geographic center of the Northern Cal- ifornia Mega-Region, the Tri-Valley innovation hub is lo- P cated at the heart of the region and delivering significant economic benefit.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco–Oakland–Hayward, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area
    12/10/2015 San Francisco–Oakland–Hayward, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area ­ Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia San Francisco–Oakland–Hayward, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia San Francisco Metropolitan Area officially known as the "San Francisco­Oakland­Hayward, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area" is a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) within the San Francisco Bay Area, which includes a number of its core cities and counties. It is defined by the Office of Management and Budget to include core areas more directly economically influenced by San Francisco rather than outlying cities such as San Jose which has its own MSA, the San Jose–Sunnyvale–Santa Clara, CA MSA. Until 2013, this MSA was known as the San Francisco–Oakland–Fremont, CA MSA.[1][2] The Federal Government definition states that it consists of 5 counties, grouped into three divisions.[2] Those 5 counties are San Francisco, Alameda, Marin, Contra Costa, and San Mateo County.[2] The three divisions are Oakland–Hayward–Berkeley (Alameda and Contra Costa Counties), San Francisco–Redwood City–South San Francisco (San Francisco and San Mateo Counties), and San The component Metropolitan Statistical Rafael (Marin County).[2] Areas and their geographical location within the San Jose–San Francisco– The MSA is a subset of the 9 county San Francisco Bay Area, as Oakland, CSA. The San Francisco– well as the 12 county Combined Statistical Area, the San Jose–San Oakland–Hayward, CA MSA is in red. Francisco–Oakland, CA CSA. Three North Bay counties are
    [Show full text]
  • Ahead of the Curve
    ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT JULY 27, 2018 On Board for Innovation: Les Schmidt, left, is CEO and founder of the Bishop Ranch Innovation Intelligence Accelerator. He is with Alex Mehran Jr., President and COO of Sunset Development, developers of Bishop Ranch, on one of the autonomous buses that serve the complex. TRI-VALLEY Ahead of the curve Phil Wente, Dale Eldridge Kay, Tim Harkness Brian Won Bin Lee, Winegrower, Wente Family Estates CEO, Innovation Tri-Valley Leadership Group Founder, Unchained Labs Student entrepreneur SPONSORS A Sunset Development Project 2 ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT TRI-VALLEY | AHEAD OF THE CURVE SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS TIMES A relationship aged to perfection. Celebrating over 50 years in the Tri-Valley. Fremont Bank is uniquely positioned as the only independent, locally Proud to offer 5 convenient owned, full-service community bank in the San Francisco Bay Area. Tri-Valley locations: From our 50 plus years of partnering with our Tri-Valley communities, Pleasanton Branch to offering unprecedented access to local decision makers who Livermore Branch understand your goals, Fremont Bank is proud to be the Tri-Valley’s San Ramon Branch trusted financial partner. Danville Branch Dublin Branch Call or stop by one of our Tri-Valley Branches to experience The Bay Area’s Premier Community Bank for yourself. (800) 359-BANK (2265) | www.fremontbank.com Equal Housing Lender | Member FDIC | NMLS #478471 | PR-1014-0718 JULY 27, 2018 TRI-VALLEY | AHEAD OF THE CURVE ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT 3 THE TRI-VALLEY What is the 101 880 REGION 580 Tri-Valley? 680 Danville he Tri-Valley is a quintet of cities in Northern California lo- San Ramon cated in the eastern Bay Area, centered around the conver- gence of Interstates 580 and 680.
    [Show full text]
  • Muwekma Ohlone Tribal Land Acknowledgment for the City of San Jose and Surrounding Region Thámien Ancestral Muwekma Ohlone Territory
    Mákkin Mak Muwékma Wolwóolum, ’Akkoyt Mak-Warep, Manne Mak Hiswi! We Are Muwekma Ohlone, Welcome To Our Ancestral Homeland! Muwekma Ohlone Tribal Land Acknowledgment For The City of San Jose and Surrounding Region Thámien Ancestral Muwekma Ohlone Territory We would like to recognize that while we gather at the Indian Health Center of Santa Clara Valley located in the City of San Jose, we are gathered on the ethno-historic tribal territory of the Thámien Ohlone- speaking tribal groups, which included the lands of the Paleños - whose tribal region was named after their powerful chief Capitan Pala, and the two Mexican land grants located in the East Hills above San Jose - and who were intermarried with the direct ancestors of some of the lineages enrolled in the Muwekma Ohlone Tribe of the San Francisco Bay Area, whom were missionized into Missions Santa Clara, San Jose, and San Francisco. The present-day Muwekma Ohlone Tribe, with an enrolled Bureau of Indian Affairs documented membership of over 600 members, is comprised of all of the known surviving Indian lineages aboriginal to the San Francisco Bay region who trace the Tribe’s ancestry through the Missions Santa Clara, San Jose, and San Francisco, during the advent of the Hispano-European empire into Alta California beginning in AD 1769. The Muwekma families are the successors and living members of the sovereign, historic, previously Federally Recognized Verona Band of Alameda County, now formally recognized as the Muwekma Ohlone Tribe of San Francisco Bay Area. Muwekma means La Gente – The People in our traditional Chochenyo-Ohlone language.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Bay Area
    San Francisco Bay Area Vacaville Á to to Sacramento Á Elk Grove Santa Rosa 121 d Sonoma Lake a o 160 ÁHood Á .vSolano R Cosumnes 104 Mission 29 Park 113 Courtland River Bodega 101 Á Petaluma 12 Sonoma Napa Preserve Bay Adobe Fairfield t Locke Tomales Petaluma ª SHP t 80 Á .v Galt Tomales Á Á 116 SuisunÁ Á Point r 1 City 12 e v i Á 121 29 R Walnut Rio Grove ª Vista Grizzly Western Á Olompali Island Railway Woodbridge Á SHP Museum Tomalesª ª Á Isleton Marine World .v Lodi Bay SP Point San .vPablo Bay 37 ª Africa USA 5 Reyes Novato Á National Benicia InvernessÁ Station Á Wildlife Refuge 680 88 Á Vallejo Capitol Suisun 12 Olema Á 780 SHP Á San Pablo Bay Samuel P. Taylor Beniciaª Beniciaª ª SP Bay 160 Hercules SRA Á Mission Martinez Á Pittsburg THE DELTA San 101 China Camp Pinole Á 4 POINT REYES State Park Á t Antioch Point Rafael ª Concord Á NATIONAL Arcangel ª San Pablo John Reyes Muir Á Stockton SEASHORE San Rafael Á Concord t e Mt Tamalpais Richmond Nat Hist Pavilion Brentwood Bolinas San t Site 2,604' Anselmo Á Walnut ª Á Lagoon 580 Clayton Stinson Á El Cerrito Creek 4 Preserve Á Larkspur Richardson Á Beach £ Bay Audubon Á Orinda Á Mill 24 Á Sanctuary Á Mount Diablo ª Mt Diablo Á Mt .vTamalpais SP.v Valley Á Lafayette French ª Tiburon Emeryville State Park £ 3,849' Muir Woodsª Á .v Angel Byron Camp Nat’l Mon BelvedereÁ Á Island SP Á ÁBerkeley Á ª Sausalito M Eugene O’Neill 80 ac GOLDEN GATE Á Ar Lathrop Alcatraz 980 thu Nat’l Hist Site NAT’L REC AREA r 680 Á 101 ª Danvilleª Clifton Court tOakland Forebay MantecaÁ Pier 39 ª F Á w y Golden
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Area Housing Crisis Report Card
    June 2002 Key Findings San Francisco Bay Area 72% of Bay Area governments are failing to take the most basic steps to address Housing the affordable housing shortage. Three local actions could double the production of affordable homes: allowing Crisis more apartments to be built, dedicating local funds to affordable housing, and Report adopting inclusionary zoning. Local governments helped cause our affordable housing shortage but also have Card the means to turn failure into success. Desperate for housing A crowd gathers at San Francisco Housing Authority after the waiting list for low income housing vouchers was reopened for the first time in three years. The Voice of Affordable Housing San Francisco Bay Area Housing Crisis Report Card Table Of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... 1 Grades on the Housing Crisis Report Card ............................................................................... 3 How Cities Prolong The Bay Area Housing Crisis ................................................................. 4 What the Grades Mean ............................................................................................................... 6 Who Needs Affordable Housing in the Bay Area?.................................................................. 7 The Status Quo Is Failing To Provide Housing Choices ........................................................... 8 Housing Element Results Fall Short: New Affordable Housing
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Action Plan 1 Acknowledgements
    City of Redwood City November 2020 City of Redwood City Climate Action Plan 1 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements Redwood City City Council Environmental Initiatives Sub-Committee Diane Howard, Mayor Ian Bain, Council Member Shelly Masur, Vice Mayor Giselle Hale, Council Member Alicia C. Aguirre, Council Member Ian Bain, Council Member Janet Borgens, Council Member Giselle Hale, Council Member Diana Reddy, Council Member Redwood City City Manager Melissa Stevenson Diaz Redwood City City Staff Alex Khojikian, Deputy City Manager Terence Kyaw, Public Works Director Deanna La Croix, Executive Assistant to the City Manager Daniel Barros, Public Works Superintendent Jennifer Yamaguma, Public Communications Manager Justin Chapel, Public Works Superintendent Mark Muenzer, Community Development and Transportation Adrian Lee, Public Works Superintendent Director Sindy Mulyono-Danre, Public Works Jessica Manzi, Transportation Manager Superintendent Christina McTaggart, Building Official Vicki Sherman, Environmental Initiatives Coordinator Kirk Gharda, Management Analyst Intern This Climate Action Plan was developed using the Regionally Integrated Climate Action Planning Suite (RICAPS) template and climate action planning tools. Updated RICAPS template and tools - 2020 Funding: California utility customers, administered by Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) under the auspices of the California Public Utilities Commission and with matching funds provided by the City and County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG). Ad Hoc Committee
    [Show full text]
  • Alameda County
    County Summaries Alameda County Overview Located at the heart of the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area, Alameda County is the second-largest county in the Bay Area, with a population of over 1.66 million. The extensive transportation network of roads, rails, buses, trails and pathways carries roughly 1.2 million commute trips daily to, from, within and through the county, supporting economic growth in the Bay Area, California and the rest of the nation. The county’s transportation system is multimodal, with non-auto trips growing more quickly than auto trips: between 2010 and 2018, for every new solo driver, four people began using transit, walking, biking, or telecommuting. Roads and Highways Alameda County roadways move people and goods within the county and beyond and support multiple transportation modes. As regional economic and population growth increase demand for goods and services, a variety of modes, including cars, transit, bikes and trucks, are competing to access the same facilities. The majority of Alameda County’s 3,978 road miles are highways, arterials and major local roads that provide access to housing, jobs, education and transit. Forty percent of daily trips in Alameda County are carried on arterials and major roads. Currently, five of the Bay Area’s top 10 most-congested freeway segments are in Alameda County, and average freeway delays are growing. The congestion in Alameda County is compounded by the large amount of vehicle, rail and Travelers have made over 14.5 million trips on the I-580 freight travel through Alameda Express Lanes since opening in February 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • A Geographic History of San Lorenzo Creek Watershed
    A GEOGRAPHIC HISTORY OF SAN LORENZO CREEK WATERSHED LANDSCAPE PATTERNS UNDERLYING HUMAN ACTIVITIES IN THE LANDS OF THE YRGIN MISSION SAN JOSE RANCHO, 1796-1834 SAN LEANDRO, SAN LORENZO, AND SAN RAMON RANCHOS, 1830s-1849 TOWNS OF HAYWARD’S, SQUATTERSVILLE, AND MT EDEN, 1850s CITIES OF HAYWARD, SAN LORENZO, AND CASTRO VALLEY Robin Grossinger and Elise Brewster San Francisco Estuary Institute Regional Watershed Program Prepared for the Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Clean Water Program SFEI Contribution 85 December 2003 Some agents of change in the San Lorenzo Creek watershed, 1769-2003. Rainfall data (July-June year) compiled by Lester McKee from Hayward data, using correlation to early San Francisco rainfall records that were developed by Jan Null (ggweather.com). Local flooding data from FEMA 1986 and Modrell (pers. comm.). Mission livestock data from Jackson 1994. Population data from Eden Writers 1975. San Francisco Estuary Institute 2 San Lorenzo Creek Landscape Patterns in the San Lorenzo Creek Watershed and Surrounding Areas Table of Contents San Lorenzo Creek Watershed ……………………………………………………………………………. 2 San Lorenzo Creek …………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 Alluvial Plain …………………………………………………………………………………….……………. 5 The Bay - Tidal Marshland ………………………………………………………….……………………. 6 Salt Ponds ………………………………………………………….………………………………………….. 7 Landings ……………………………………………………………………………………………….………. 7 Mission San Jose Rangeland ………………………………………………………………….……….. 9 Diramaderos - Sausals - Indian Grant - San Lorenzo Grove …………………….……………
    [Show full text]
  • FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thomas Duryea President and CEO Summit
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thomas Duryea President and CEO Summit State Bank PO Box 6188 Santa Rosa, CA 95406 (707) 568-4920 [email protected] Summit State Bank Recognized as a Top Corporate Philanthropist in the Bay Area Santa Rosa, CA – (August 5, 2013) – Summit State Bank (NASDAQ: SSBI) received recognition as one of the Top 75 Corporate Philanthropists in the Bay Area by the San Francisco Business Times. Summit State Bank ranked eighth for percentage of net profits donated in the Bay Area. Summit State Bank was the only Sonoma County-based company to earn this recognition. The award recognizes those companies that give back through innovative programs and strong commitment by its team members to make discernible and lasting differences in the communities they serve. “We are honored that Summit State Bank has been recognized as one of the top 75 Corporate Philanthropists in the San Francisco Bay Area. We are proud to represent Sonoma County’s philanthropic spirit,” says Tom Duryea, President and CEO of Summit State Bank. Other recipients of this prestigious award were Google Inc., Charles Schwab & Co. Inc., Microsoft Corp., Levi Strauss & Co., Clif Bar & Co., to name a few. Summit State Bank has total assets of $432 million and total equity of $61 million at June 30, 2013. Headquartered in Sonoma County, the Bank provides diverse financial products and services throughout Sonoma, Napa, San Francisco, and Marin Counties. Summit State Bank received the 2012 Community Bank Award from the American Bankers Association for its nonprofit work. In addition, Summit has been recognized with the Gold Medal award for Best Business Bank from the Northbay Biz Magazine, and as one of the North Bay’s Best Places to Work by the North Bay Business Journal.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Consistency with Adopted Plans
    3 CONSISTENCY WITH ADOPTED PLANS In conformance with Section 15125(d) of the CEQA Guidelines, the following section discusses the consistency of the proposed project with relevant adopted plans and policies. 3.1 AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION – CURRENT AND DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLANS The Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) develops comprehensive land use plans to provide for the orderly growth of the area surrounding each airport within the County. Although the ALUC has no jurisdiction over existing land uses, its role is to ensure that new land uses or other proposed actions are compatible with the Airport environment. The Santa Clara County ALUC has adopted a Land Use Plan for those areas in the vicinity of Norman Y. Mineta San José International, Reid-Hillview, Palo Alto, and South County airports. The current Land Use Plan was adopted in September 1992 and most recently amended in November 2008.2 The goal of the adopted Land Use Plan is to ensure that new land uses near the airports are such that the public’s exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards are minimized. The adopted Land Use Plan includes policies that set forth maximum noise exposure levels. It also includes safety zones that limit the type and density of development and building heights near airports. The City’s eastern border is adjacent to the Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport. Portions of Santa Clara, including several of the Focus Areas, as further described in Section 4.1 Land Use, 4.13 Hazards, and 4.14 Noise, fall within the noise restriction area and height restriction area, as defined in the adopted Land Use Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Redwood City
    City of Redwood City Proposal for Ferry Financial Feasibility Study & Cost-Benefit and Economic Impact Analyses October 11, 2018 Acknowledgments City of Redwood City Council Members Project Team Diane Howard, Mayor Christopher Dacumos, Management Analyst II, City of Redwood City Shelly Masur, Vice Mayor Jessica Manzi, Transportation Manager, City of Alicia C. Aguirre, Council Member Redwood City Ian Bain, Council Member Radha Mehta, Management Fellow, City of Janet Borgens, Council Member Redwood City Giselle Hale, Council Member Kristine A. Zortman, Executive Director, Port of Redwood City Diana Reddy, Council Member Kevin Connolly, Planning & Development Port of Redwood City Commission Manager, WETA Arthi Krubanandh, Transportation Planner, Ralph A. Garcia, Chair WETA Richard (Dick) Claire, Vice Chair Chad Mason, Senior Planner & Project R. Simms Duncan, Port Commissioner Manager, WETA Richard “Dick” Dodge, Port Commissioner James Connolly, Project Manager, COWI Jessica Rivas, Marine Engineer, COWI Lorianna Kastrop, Port Commissioner Ashleigh Kanat, Executive Vice President, EPS San Mateo County Transportation Jason Moody, Principal, EPS Authority Kate Traynor, Senior Associate, EPS Jennifer Williams, Analyst II, San Mateo County Lindsey Klein, Project Planner, PlaceWorks Transportation Authority Charlie Knox, Principal, PlaceWorks Peter Skinner, Director of Grants and Funding, Bill Hurrell, Vice President, CDM Smith San Mateo County Transportation Authority Piyali Chaudhuri, Project Manager, CDM Smith Peter Martin, Project Technical
    [Show full text]