DOCSLIB.ORG

Enviromental Indicators 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Enviromental Indicators 2012 REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT, PERMIT AND INSPECTION Environmental Inventory and Information Management Department ENVIROMENTAL INDICATORS 2012 20th YEAR OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ANKARA 2013 REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT, PERMIT AND INSPECTION Environmental Inventory and Information Management Department REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT, PERMIT AND INSPECTION Environmental Inventory and Information Management Department ENVIROMENTAL INDICATORS 2012 Release NO:17 FOR YOUR INFORMATION REQUESTS AND QUESTIONS ABOUT RELEASE CONTENT Environmental Inventory and Information Management Department Data Evaluation Divison Tel: +90 (312) 410 17 00 Fax:+90 (312) 419 21 92 e-mail: [email protected] Web http://www.csb.gov.tr/gm/ced/ ISBN 978-605-5294-22-9 T.R. MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT, PERMIT AND INSPECTION Vekâletler Cad. No:1 Bakanlıklar/Ankara PRODUCTION All rights of this publication is reserved to Republic of Turkey Ministry Of Environment and Urbanization due to the Law of Intellectual and Artistic Works numbered 5846. It shall not be reproduced or distributed without authorization by real or legal entity. One of the most important issues among our task as the Ministry is the submission of true and independent information about the environment to public.In addition to activities in creation of awareness, development, application and evaluation of environmental policies, our ministry is the most important public institute in the country which provide information for also public. Environmental indicators booklet we submitted as an important source establishes a bridge between past and present, gives opinion about environmental issues and guides all the related institutions and people. I wish “Environmental Indicators 2012” booklet to be an instructive in taking environmental decisions. Erdoğan BAYRAKTAR Minister of Environment and Urbanization 6 Other publications Issue No. 1: Ankara Province Environmental Status Report, 1994 Issue No. 2: Provincial Environmental Problems and Priorities Inventory Assessment Report, 1996 Issue No. 3: Industries Affecting Environment Primarily and Main Sector Activities , 1996 Issue No. 4: Environmental Atlas of Turkey 96, 1997 Issue No. 5: Enviromental Status Report ofTurkey, 2007 Issue No. 6: Inventory of Environmental Problems and Priorities Assessment Report of Turkey (2005 - 2006), 2008 Issue No. 7: Environmental Indicators Handbook 2008, 2009 Issue No. 8: Environmental Indicators Handbook 2009, 2010 Issue No. 9: Inventory of Environmental Problems Priorities Assessment Report of Turkey 2007-2008, 2010 Issue No. 10: Environmental Indicators Handbook 2010, 2011 Issue No. 11: Environmental Status Report of Turkey, 2011 Issue No. 12: Environmental Indicators Handbook 2011, 2012 Issue No. 13-1:2011 Environmental Inspection Report, 2012 Issue No. 13-2: Environmental Inspection Report of Turkey in 2011, 2012 Issue No. 14: Inventory of Environmental Problems and Priorities Assessment Report of Turkey, 2012 Issue No. 15: Environmental Status Report - 2012 Annual Summary - Provinces ENVIROMENTAL INDICATORS 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 CLASSIFICATION OF CONTENTS ..........................................................8 9-FISHERY SUMMARY TABLE OF INDICATORS .................................................... 10 9.1-Fishery ........................................................................................ 43 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 12 10-INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRANSPORTATION 1-POPULATION 10.1-Road And Railway Road Network ............................................. 44 1.1-Population Growth Rate ............................................................. 16 10.2- Amount of Passengers and Freight by Mode of Transportation 1.2-Urban Population ....................................................................... 17 .......................................................................................................... 45 2-ECONOMY 10.3-Number Of Motor Vehicles ...................................................... 47 2.1-Total Public Sector Expenditure ................................................. 18 11-ENERGY 2.2-Sectoral Distribution of Employment ......................................... 19 11.1-Total Energy Consumption by Sectors ...................................... 48 3-AIR – ATMOSPHERE - CLIMATE 11.2- Share of Consumption in Renewable Energy Sources ............ 49 3.1-Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................................................ 21 11.3-Energy Efficiency In Buildings ................................................... 50 3.2-Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sectors .............................. 22 12-WASTE 3.3-Rain ............................................................................................ 23 12.1- Municipal Wastes and their Disposal ...................................... 51 3.4-Temperature ............................................................................... 24 12.2- Landfill of Wastes .................................................................... 52 3.5-Sea Water Temperature ............................................................. 24 12.3-Medical Waste ......................................................................... 53 3.6-Types Of Natural Disasters ......................................................... 25 12.4- Oil Wastes ............................................................................... 54 4-AIR QUALITY 12.5-Vegetable Oil Wastes................................................................ 55 4.1- Air Pollutants ............................................................................. 26 12.6-Waste Batteries and Accumulators ......................................... 56 4.2- Number of Short-term over the limit value forAir Pollutants.... 27 12.7-Packaging Wastes ..................................................................... 57 Air Pollutants Emissions ................................................................... 28 12.8-End of Life Tires ........................................................................ 58 5-WATER - WASTEWATER 12.9- End of Life Vehicles ................................................................ 59 5.1-Water Usage ............................................................................... 29 12.10- Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment .......................... 60 5.2-Municipal Drinking Water Sources ............................................. 30 12.11-Mining Wastes ........................................................................ 61 5.3- Municipalities Served by Wastewater Treatment Plant ........... 31 12.12-Dangerous Wastes .................................................................. 62 6-LAND USE 12.13-Ship Waste Management ....................................................... 63 6.1-Land Use .................................................................................... 32 12.14- Risk Assessment and Emergency Response .......................... 64 7-AGRICULTURE 13-TOURISM 7.1-Agricultural Area Per Capita ....................................................... 33 13.1-Number of Tourists ................................................................... 65 7.2-Non-Objective Use Of Agricultural Lands ................................... 34 13.2-Blue Flag Applications .............................................................. 66 7.3-Chemical Fertilizer Consumption ............................................... 35 14-OTHER 7.4-Use Of Pesticide ........................................................................- 36 14.1-Liability Insurance .................................................................... 67 7.5-Organic Agriculture .................................................................... 37 14.2-Number of Installations with Environmental Management 7.6-Good Agricultural Practices ........................................................ 38 Certificate ......................................................................................... 68 8-BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY WATER, WASTEWATER AND WASTE DATA COMPARISON OF 2008 AND 8.1-Bilogical Diversity ....................................................................... 39 2010 ACCORDİNG TO SECTORS ........................................................ 69 8.2-Protected Areas .......................................................................... 40 DEFINITIONS ..................................................................................... 70 8.3-Forested Areas ........................................................................... 41 SOURCES .......................................................................................... 76 8.4-Forest Fires ................................................................................. 42 8 CLASSIFICATION OF INDICATORS CLASSIFICATION OF INDICATORS Different approaches implemented for the development of The other model of DPSIR framework has been established by environmental indicators, indicator sets are created within EEA (European Environment Agency) with the development of different conceptual frameworks or models. One of them is, the PSR framework in order to define the relationship between “Pressure-State-Response
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TURKEY MINISTRY of INTERIOR TURKISH NATIONAL POLICE Anti-Smuggling and Organized Crime Department
    REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF INTERIOR TURKISH NATIONAL POLICE Anti-Smuggling and Organized Crime Department 2014 NATIONAL REPORT (2013 data) TO THE EMCDDA by the Reitox National Focal Point TURKEY New Development, Trends and in-depth information on selected issues TURKISH MONITORING CENTRE FOR DRUGS AND DRUG ADDICTION (TUBİM) REITOX 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................... 2 TURKISH NATIONAL FOCAL POINT STAFF PREPARING THE REPORT ........................... 7 DATA PROVIDING AGENCIES AND AGENCY REPRESENTATIVES ................................... 8 PREFACE .............................................................................................................................. 11 ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................. 13 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 15 NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND TRENDS ................................................................................ 29 SECTION 1 ............................................................................................................................ 29 DRUG POLICY: LAWS, STRATEGIES, AND ECONOMIC ANALYSES ............................... 29 1.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 29 1.2. Legal Framework
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Aquaculture in Turkey
    MARINE AQUACULTURE IN TURKEY Edited by Akın CANDAN Süheyla KARATAŞ Hüseyin KÜÇÜKTAŞ İbrahim OKUMUŞ MARINE AQUACULTURE IN TURKEY 2007 İstanbul-Turkey Edited by Akın CANDAN Süheyla KARATAŞ Hüseyin KÜÇÜKTAŞ İbrahim OKUMUŞ All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission from the Turkish Marine Research Foundation (TÜDAV) The finding, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this publication are entirely those of authors and should not be attributed in any manner to the Turkish Marine Research Foundation (TÜDAV). Texts are as originally submitted. Citation: CANDAN, A., KARATAŞ, S., KÜÇÜKTAŞ, H., OKUMUŞ, İ. (Eds.), 2007. “Marine Aquaculture in Turkey” Turkish Marine Research Foundation. Istanbul TURKEY. Publication Number: 27 A. CANDAN Fisheries Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, TURKEY S. KARATAŞ Fisheries Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, TURKEY H. KÜÇÜKTAŞ Fish Molecular Genetics and Biotechnology Laboratory, Auburn University, Auburn, USA İ. OKUMUŞ Fisheries Faculty, Rize University, TURKEY Copyright: Türk Deniz Araştırmaları Vakfı (Turkish Marine Research Foundation) ISBN: 978-975-8825-18-9 Avaible from: Türk Deniz Araştırmaları Vakfı-Turkish Marine Research Foundation (TÜDAV) P.O. Box 10 Beykoz/ISTANBUL-TURKEY Tel: +90 216 424 07 72 Fax: + 90 216 424 07 71 Web: www.tudav.org e-mail: [email protected] Cover picture: FEZA TONAY Oceanus and Thetis Roman mosaic (400 A.C.) Antakya Museum, Antakya, Hatay,
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Health Reforms Process in Turkey
    CHAPTER 1 COUNTRY PROFILE Nazan YARDIM,MD,Public Health Specialist Serap ÇETİN ÇOBAN,MD,Public Health Specialist 1.1. GEOGRAPHY Turkey is a Eurasian country that stretches across the Anatolian peninsula in southwest Asia and the Balkan region of southeastern Europe. Turkey is situated between 36-42° northern latitudes and between 26-45° eastern longitudes. There is a 76-minutes time difference between its easternmost and westernmost tips. Its area is 814.578 square kilometers. Turkey borders the Black Sea in the north; Commonwealth of Independent States (Armenia, Georgia, Nahcevan), Iran in the east; Iraq, Syria and the Mediterranean Sea in the south; the Aegean Sea in the west; and Greece and Bulgaria in the northeast. Marmara Sea is located in the middle of Turkey’s northwest. Marmara Sea is connected to the Aegean Sea by the Dardanelles and to the Black sea with the Bosporus Strait. The Aegean Sea is an arm of the Mediterranean Sea. The Mediterranean Sea is connected to the Atlantic Ocean with the Gibraltar in the West. Thus, Turkey’s surrounding seas open to world oceans. The Straits carry importance for Turkey and Black sea countries. Moreover, the Bosphorus Strait and the two bridges on it (Bosphorus and Fatih Bridges) connect Asia and Europe on the land. In the south, Turkey is very close to North Africa countries. In short, Turkey is located between Europe-Asia and Africa continents. Land border of Turkey is 2.753 km. in total. Turkey has the longest land border with Syria (877 km.). Turkey also has land borders with Georgia (276 km.), Armenia (316 km.), Nahcevan (Azerbaijan) (18 km.), Iran (454 km.), Iraq (331 km.), Bulgaria (269 km.), and Greece (212 km).
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Turkey
    Article Regional Variations of Land-Use Development and Land-Use/Cover Change Dynamics: A Case Study of Turkey Eda Ustaoglu * and Arif Cagdaş Aydınoglu Department of Geomatics Engineering, Gebze Technical University Gebze, Kocaeli-41400, Turkey; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected], tel. +90 532 694 8263 Received: 6 March 2019; Accepted: 5 April 2019; Published: 11 April 2019 Abstract. Population growth, economic development and rural-urban migration have caused rapid expansion of urban areas and metropolitan regions in Turkey. The structure of urban administration and planning has faced different socio-economic and political challenges, which have hindered the structured and planned development of cities and regions, resulting in an irregular and uneven development of these regions. We conducted detailed comparative analysis on spatio-temporal changes of the identified seven land-use/cover classes across different regions in Turkey with the use of Corine Land Cover (CLC) data of circa 1990, 2000, 2006 and 2012, integrated with Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques. Here we compared spatio-temporal changes of urban and non-urban land uses, which differ across regions and across different hierarchical levels of urban areas. Our findings have shown that peri-urban areas are growing more than rural areas, and even growing more than urban areas in some regions. A deeper look at regions located in different geographical zones pointed to substantial development disparities across western and eastern regions of Turkey. We also employed multiple regression models to explain any possible drivers of land-use change, regarding both urban and non-urban land uses. The results reveal that the three influencing factors-socio-economic characteristics, regional characteristics and location, and development constraints, facilitate land-use change.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Incidence of Measles in Turkey Since 1960
    Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Turk J Med Sci (2016) 46: 1101-1106 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/medical/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/sag-1503-62 An analysis of the incidence of measles in Turkey since 1960 1, 1 1 1 2 Deniz ÇALIŞKAN *, Birgül PİYAL , Recep AKDUR , Mine Esin OCAKTAN , Ceylan YOZGATLIGİL 1 Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey 2 Department of Statistics, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey Received: 11.03.2015 Accepted/Published Online: 10.10.2015 Final Version: 23.06.2016 Background/aim: The aims of this study were to evaluate measles incidence and the effect of elimination strategy interventions on the disease from 1960 to 2014 in Turkey. The administration of measles vaccine started in the rural regions in 1970; it was carried out as a campaign along with the National Vaccine Campaign in 1985, and it has been employed as combined measles, mumps, and rubella under the scope of the Measles Elimination Program (MEP) since 2006 in Turkey. While a dramatic decrease in the reporting of measles was observed between 2000 and 2010, the number of the cases has increased since 2011. Materials and methods: The time series of measles incidence was evaluated for possible structural changes with regression models using dummy variables, autocorrelated with error terms. Results: The incidence of measles showed a statistically significant decline between 1985 and 1988 (P = 0.0072) and between 2005 and 2011 (P < 0.0001). However, a statistically significant increase in incidence was noted after 2013 (P = 0.0008). Conclusion: Over the last 54 years, the pattern of measles cases demonstrated a significant decline in incidence.
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS 2013 Release NO:24
    REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND URBANISATION GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT, PERMIT AND INSPECTION Environmental Inventory and Information Management Department ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS 2013 Release NO:24 FOR YOUR INFORMATION REQUESTS AND QUESTIONS ABOUT RELEASE CONTENT Environmental Inventory and Information Management Department Data Evaluation Division Tel: +90 (312) 410 17 00 Fax:+90 (312) 419 21 92 e-mail: [email protected] Special thanks to all public institutions and organizations for their contribution. Website http://www.csb.gov.tr/gm/ced/ ISBN 978-605-5294-34-2 T.R. MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND URBANISATION GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT, PERMIT, AND INSPECTION Vekâletler Cad. No:1 Bakanlıklar/Ankara PRODUCTION All rights of this publication are reserved to Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Urbanisation due to the Law of Intellectual and Artistic Works number 5846. It shall not be reproduced or distributed without authorization by real or legal entity. 2 FOREWORD It is of utmost importance to obtain correct data in order to create awareness regarding the environment, to improve environmental policies and to evaluate the results. Environmental indicators are the basic means used in the evaluation of the pressure on the environment, changes in environmental situations and the success of environmental policies implemented. By the booklet of Environmental Indicators, it is aimed to reflect the relationship between the environment and all other sectors available and produce understandable results enabling to monitor the changes over time. I wish “Environmental Indicators 2013” booklet, prepared with current data, will serve the purpose of informing the public about environmental issues and be used as a guidance to all institutions and organizations related to environment and while making environmental decisions.
    [Show full text]