Gerrymandering Decentralization: Political Selection of Grants-Financed Local Jurisdictions Stuti Khemani Development Research Group, The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Work in Progress* Draft Date: June 4, 2009 Abstract Decentralization of anti-poverty programs in the developing world is described by many policy-makers as a means to greater accountability and better governance. This paper examines such decentralization as the outcome of endogenous policy choice by central politicians under electoral pressure. Politicians decentralize beneficiary selection of spending programs, financed by grants, to enable local targeting of pivotal voters to win elections. Local government spending is allocated to private transfers to poor swing voters in exchange for their vote. Decentralization in this model fuels vote-buying, patronage, or pork-barrel politics, and comes at the expense of spending on broad public goods. There is anecdotal evidence on local politics in several large countries that is consistent with this theory. * Please send any comments to:
[email protected]. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of the World Bank, its Executive Directors, or the countries they represent. 1. Introduction Decentralization to rural local governments is viewed as a significant institutional reform to address political agency problems in developing countries, particularly of government responsiveness to poor citizens (World Bank, various; Bardhan, 2002).1 In highly influential analyses of the promises and pitfalls of decentralization in this regard, Bardhan and Mookherjee (2000, 2005, 2006a) identified “capture” by local elites in unequal societies as a risk, and inspired a number of empirical research projects to assess the benefit incidence of local public spending on poor and rich households, and to explore its covariates (Araujo et al, 2008; Bardhan and Mookherjee, 2006; Galasso and Ravallion, 2005; Mansuri and Rao, 2004).