DOCSLIB.ORG

Mn 1000 Ar Index 1903 1904.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mn 1000 Ar Index 1903 1904.Pdf INDEX. PART I. A. Page. Apples ....................................... · · · ...... · · · · · 5 Apples, Alexander ........................................... 18 Apples•, Anisini .............................................. 5, 18 Apples, Antonovka ........................................... 18 Apples, Apple Growing in Minnesota ......................... 1-80 Apples, Avista ............................................... 18 Apples, Ben Davis .......................................... 18 Apples, Bode ............................................... 19 Apples, Breskovka ........................................... 19 Apples, Brett .................. .' ............................ 5, 19 Apples, Brier Sweet ........................................ 5, 19 Apples, Charlamoff ......................................... 5, 19 Apples, Christmas .......................................... 19 Apples,. Cross .......... .: .................... ·" ............. 20 Apples, Cultivation ' ....................................... '. .. 9 Apple5', .Dartt's Hybrid ..................................... 20 Apples, Duchess ............................................ 5, 20 Apples, Early Strawberry .................................... 5,20 Apples.,· Esteline ............................................... 5, 20· Apples, Fameuse or Snow ................................... 21 Apples, Faribault .................. "· ....................... 5 Apples, Florence ....... : .................................... 5, 21 Apples, Forming the Tree ................................. ~ .. 10 Apples" Gideon ............... ,. , , ........................•.. 21 Apples, Gideo'n N ci. 6 ....................................... 5 Apples, Haas ............................................... 22 \ Apples, Hibernal ........................................... 5, 21 Apples, Hyslop ............................................. 22 Apples, Iowa Beauty ....................................... 22 Apples., Kaump .............................................• . 23 Apples, Kursk Anis .......................................... 22 Apples, Long Arcade ....................................... 23 Apples, Longfield .... .,. ................. 5,23 Apples, Lowland Raspberry ................................ 5,23 Apples, Lubsk Queen ....................................... 23 Apples, Lyman's Prolific .... ~ ................................ 5, 24 Apples, l\1alinda ............................................. 5,,25 Apples, Martha ................... ·" ........................ 5, 24· Apple5', Mary .............................................,. .. 24 Apples, McMahon ....... ; ............. : .................... 5,25 Apples, Milwaukee ........................................... 24 Apples, l\1innesota ........................................... 5, 24 Apples, Minnesota Gilbert ..................................•. 21 Apples, Newell ..................... ~. : . .................... 5, 25 Apples, Northwestern Greening .................•....•....... 5,25 240 INDEX. Page. ·Apples, Okabena . • . 5, 26 Apples, Ostrekoff .................... , . 26 Apples, Patten's Greening . ... 5, 26 Apples, Peerless . 5, 26 Apples, Peter . 27 Apples, Pewaukee . • . 27 Apples, Phoen1x No. 50 ..................· . • . 26 Apples, Planting .............................. ., . 7 Apples•, Plumb's Cider . .. 27 Apples, Pride of Minneapolis ................ : . 27 Apple Trees, Pruning. 15 Apples, Ra ump ............................................... · 5 Apples, Red Siberi:an Crab.................................... 27 Apples, Repka Ma!enka ...................... , . 5, 27 Apples, St. Lawrence . 28 Apples, Scott's Winter . 5, 28 Apples•,. Shields . 5 Apples, Scoulard Scab . 28 Apples, Sweet Russett . , . 5, 28 Apples, Tetofsky · . ... 5, 28 Apples, Transcendent ............ ~ . 5 Apples, Transcendent Crab . 29 Apples, Transparent . 28 Apples, University . ... 5, 29 Apples·, Utter ............................ , . ... 29 Apples, Virginia . 5 Apples, Virginia Crab . .. .. .. .. 29 Apples, W:albridge . 29 Apples, Wealthy ............................ , . • . 5, 30 Apples, Whitney . .. • . ... 5, 30 Apples, Whitney No. 20...................................... 16 Apples, Wild Crab Seedling . 30 Apple Trees, Winter Protection. 12 Apples, Wolf River . 5, 30 Apples, Yell ow Siberian . 30 Apples, Yellow Sweet . 5, 31 App.les, Yell ow Tmnsparent . .. .. .. .. .. 5 F. Fire Blight .............•......... ·. • . • . 14 P. Pyrus baccata ............ , .................................... 15 Pyrus malus 15 R. Root Killing , . • • . • . • . .. • • . • • • . • • • . • • . 6 s. Sunscald 10 INDEX. PART II. A. Page. Ammoniacal Copper Carbonate .......•....................... 98 Anthracnose, on Curnant ..................................... 104 Anthracnose, on Grape ................................. : . ... 121 Ants ....................•..................•............... 121, 164 Aphids .......................... ,, .......................... 58, 121 Apple A phis, A phis mali ................................ ~- .... 58 Apple A phis, winter condition .............................. 79 Apple Curculio, Anthonomus quadrigibbus, winter condition ..... 80 Apple Insects, Key to ....................................... 50 Apple Leaf Mirier, Tischeria malifoliella ....................... 66 Apple Leaf Skeletonizer, Canarsia hammondi ................. 68 Apple Maggot, Trypeta pomonella ................. _........... 76 Apple Sphinx, ·Sphinx gordius ................................ 74 Apple Tree Borers .......................... ·................ 55 Apple Tree Bucculatrix, Bucculatrix pomifoliella ............... 74 Apple Twig Borer, Amphicerus bicaudatus ..................... 76 Army Worm ......................... ; ....................• .. 122 Arsenate of Lead ............................................ 99 Arsenic Bran Mash .......................................... 99 Arsenite of Lime ............................................ 100 Ars'eni te of Soda ............................................. 100 · Asparagus Rust ............................................. 122 B. Bed f3ugs_ . ... 122 Benzine . 100 Bisulfid of Carbon............................................ 100 Bitter Rot of Apple.......................................... 104 Black Knot of Plum ............................. ·. 122 Black Rot on Plum·............ • . 10·4 Blight on Cantaloupe . ·.. 104 Blight on Celery . ... 104 Blight on. Pear . • . 104 Blight on Plum . ... 104· Blight on Potatoes ......................................... 105, 124 Blight on Strawberry .............. , . • . • . 105 Blight on Tomatoes . 105 Blissus leucopterus .................. , .... _. 11 Borax . 101 Bordeaux Mixture ..................... ._..................... 101 Bordeaux Mixture and Paris Green............................ 105 Bordeaux Resin Mixture ....... , . 105 Box Elder Bug ........................................ ; . .. .. 122 Bran :Mash ............... , . 105 Bud Moth ................................................... 68, 62 Buffalo Tree-hopper, Ceresa bubalus ....................... .- ..•. 52, 122 Bumble Flower Beetle, Euphoria inda.......................... 78 24~ INDEX. c. Page. Cabbage Butterfly . 17:7 Cabbage JVI1aggotsi . 12·2 Cabbage Worms, see colored plate, also. 122 ..:amphor . ................................. 105, 115 Canker on Apple . 104 Canker Worm, fall, Anisopteryx pometa.ria. 69 Oanker Worm, winter condition . 79 Canker Worm, spring, Paleacrita vernata. 62 Carbon Bisulfid . 105 Carpoglyphus passularum . .. 158 Cecidomyia ·destructor .............. , . 1 Cecropia Moth, Attacus cecropia, see also colored plate .......... 71, 172 · Cecropria Moth, winter condition............................. 80 Cherry Insects, Key to . 94 Cherry Leaf Beetle, Galerucella cavicollis. 96 ·Cherry Tree Plant Louse . 96 Cherry Tree Scale ..................................... , . 96 Chinch Bug ....................................... ., . 11 Clothes Moth . ; . 166 Cockroaches . 162 Codling Moth ............................................ 75, 76, 122 Codling Moth, winter conditioff............................ ... 79 Confused. Flour Beetle.. 169 Copper Acetate . 106 Copper Carbonate ................................ ~ . 106 Copper Sulphate . 106 Correspondents, Reports from................................ 43 Corros-ive Sublimate ...................................... ., . 107 Creolin ......... : . .. 108 Criddle Mixture ............................................. 24, 108 Crude Petroleum . 108 Cucumber Beetle . 123 Cucumber Beetle, striped..................................... 160 Cupr1am . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawk Moths of North America Is Richly Illustrated with Larval Images and Contains an Abundance of Life History Information
    08 caterpillars EUSA/pp244-273 3/9/05 6:37 PM Page 244 244 TULIP-TREE MOTH CECROPIA MOTH 245 Callosamia angulifera Hyalophora cecropia RECOGNITION Frosted green with shiny yellow, orange, and blue knobs over top and sides of body. RECOGNITION Much like preceding but paler or Dorsal knobs on T2, T3, and A1 somewhat globular and waxier in color with pale stripe running below set with black spinules. Paired knobs on A2–A7 more spiracles on A1–A10 and black dots on abdomen cylindrical, yellow; knob over A8 unpaired and rounded. lacking contrasting pale rings. Yellow abdominal Larva to 10cm. Caterpillars of larch-feeding Columbia tubercle over A8 short, less than twice as high as broad. Silkmoth (Hyalophora columbia) have yellow-white to Larva to 6cm. Sweetbay Silkmoth (Callosamia securifera) yellow-pink instead of bright yellow knobs over dorsum similar in appearance but a specialist on sweet bay. Its of abdomen and knobs along sides tend to be more white than blue (as in Cecropia) and are yellow abdominal tubercle over A8 is nearly three times as set in black bases (see page 246). long as wide and the red knobs over thorax are cylindrical (see page 246). OCCURRENCE Urban and suburban yards and lots, orchards, fencerows, woodlands, OCCURRENCE Woodlands and forests from Michigan, southern Ontario, and and forests from Canada south to Florida and central Texas. One generation with mature Massachusetts to northern Florida and Mississippi. One principal generation northward; caterpillars from late June through August over most of range. two broods in South with mature caterpillars from early June onward.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Native Pollinator-Friendly Plant List (Updated May 2021)
    RECOMMENDED NATIVE POLLINATOR-FRIENDLY PLANT LIST (UPDATED MAY 2021) Asheville GreenWorks is excited to share this updated native pollinator-friendly plant list for Asheville’s Bee City USA program! As the launchpad of the national Bee City USA program in 2012, we are gratified that throughout our community, individuals, organizations, and businesses are doing their part to reverse staggering global pollinator declines. Please check out our Pollinator Habitat Certification program at https://www.ashevillegreenworks.org/pollinator-garden-certification.html and our annual Pollination Celebration! during National Pollinator Week in June at https://www.ashevillegreenworks.org/pollination-celebration.html. WHY LANDSCAPE WITH POLLINATORS IN MIND? Asheville GreenWorks’ Bee City USA program encourages everyone to incorporate as many native plants into their landscapes and avoid insect-killing pesticides as much as possible. Here’s why. Over the millennia, hundreds of thousands of plant and animal pollinator species have perfected their pollination dances. Pollinating animals rely upon the carbohydrate-rich nectar and/or the protein-rich pollen supplied by flowers, and plants rely on pollinators to carry their pollen to other flowers to produce seeds and sustain their species. Nearly 90% of the world’s flowering plant species depend on pollinators to help them reproduce! Plants and pollinators form the foundation for our planet’s rich biodiversity generally. For example, 96% of terrestrial birds feed their young exclusively moth and butterfly caterpillars. ABOUT THIS NATIVE PLANT LIST An elite task force, listed at the end of this document, verified which plants were native to Western North Carolina and agreed this list should focus on plants’ value to pollinators as food--including nectar, pollen, and larval host plants for moth and butterfly caterpillars, as well as nesting habitat for bumble and other bees.
    [Show full text]
  • Archiv Für Naturgeschichte
    © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at Lepidoptera für 1903. Bearbeitet von Dr. Robert Lucas in Rixdorf bei Berlin. A. Publikationen (Autoren alphabetisch) mit Referaten. Adkin, Robert. Pyrameis cardui, Plusia gamma and Nemophila noc- tuella. The Entomologist, vol. 36. p. 274—276. Agassiz, G. Etüde sur la coloration des ailes des papillons. Lausanne, H. Vallotton u. Toso. 8 °. 31 p. von Aigner-Abafi, A. (1). Variabilität zweier Lepidopterenarten. Verhandlgn. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien, 53. Bd. p. 162—165. I. Argynnis Paphia L. ; IL Larentia bilineata L. — (2). Protoparce convolvuli. Entom. Zeitschr. Guben. 17. Jahrg. p. 22. — (3). Über Mimikry. Gaea. 39. Jhg. p. 166—170, 233—237. — (4). A mimicryröl. Rov. Lapok, vol. X, p. 28—34, 45—53 — (5). A Mimicry. Allat. Kozl. 1902, p. 117—126. — (6). (Über Mimikry). Allgem. Zeitschr. f. Entom. 7. Bd. (Schluß p. 405—409). Über Falterarten, welche auch gesondert von ihrer Umgebung, in ruhendem Zustande eine eigentümliche, das Auge täuschende Form annehmen (Lasiocampa quercifolia [dürres Blatt], Phalera bucephala [zerbrochenes Ästchen], Calocampa exoleta [Stück morschen Holzes]. — [Stabheuschrecke, Acanthoderus]. Raupen, die Meister der Mimikry sind. Nachahmung anderer Tiere. Die Mimik ist in vielen Fällen zwecklos. — Die wenn auch recht geistreichen Mimikry-Theorien sind doch vielleicht nur ein müßiges Spiel der Phantasie. Aitken u. Comber, E. A list of the butterflies of the Konkau. Journ. Bombay Soc. vol. XV. p. 42—55, Suppl. p. 356. Albisson, J. Notes biologiques pour servir ä l'histoire naturelle du Charaxes jasius. Bull. Soc. Etud. Sc. nat. Nimes. T. 30. p. 77—82. Annandale u. Robinson. Siehe unter S w i n h o e.
    [Show full text]
  • Series I. Correspondence, 1871-1894 Box 1 Folder 1 Darwin to Riley
    Special Collections at the National Agricultural Library: Charles Valentine Riley Collection Series I. Correspondence, 1871-1894 Box 1 Folder 1 Darwin to Riley. June 1, 1871. Letter from Charles Darwin to Riley thanking him for report and instructions on noxious insects. Downs, Beckerham, Kent (England). (handwritten copy of original). Box 1 Folder 2 Koble to Riley. June 30, 1874. Letter from John C. Koble giving physical description of chinch bugs and explaining how the bugs are destroying corn crops in western Kentucky. John C. Koble of L. S. Trimble and Co., Bankers. Box 1 Folder 3 Saunders to Riley. Nov. 12, 1874. William Saunders receipt to C. V. Riley for a copy of descriptions of two insects that baffle the vegetable carnivora. William Saunders, Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. Box 1 Folder 4 Young to Riley. Dec. 13, 1874. William Young describes the flat-headed borer and its effects on orchards during summer and winter seasons. From Palmyra Gate Co., Nebraska. Box 1 Folder 5 Saunders to Riley. Dec. 22, 1874. William Saunders receipt of notes of investigation on the insects associated with Sarracenia. William Saunders, Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Box 1 Folder 6 Bonhaw to Riley. Jan. 19, 1875. L. N. Bonhaw requesting a copy of his Missouri report, for him to establish a manual or handbook on entomology, and to find out about an insect that deposits eggs. Subject: tomato worm, hawk moth. 1 http://www.nal.usda.gov/speccoll/ Special Collections at the National Agricultural Library: Charles Valentine Riley Collection Box 1 Folder 7 Holliday to Riley.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Texas Lepidoptera Knudson & Bordelon, Jan 2018 Texas Lepidoptera Survey
    1 Checklist of Texas Lepidoptera Knudson & Bordelon, Jan 2018 Texas Lepidoptera Survey ERIOCRANIOIDEA TISCHERIOIDEA ERIOCRANIIDAE TISCHERIIDAE Dyseriocrania griseocapitella (Wlsm.) Eriocraniella mediabulla Davis Coptotriche citripennella (Clem.) Eriocraniella platyptera Davis Coptotriche concolor (Zell.) Coptotriche purinosella (Cham.) Coptotriche clemensella (Cham). Coptotriche sulphurea (F&B) NEPTICULOIDEA Coptotriche zelleriella (Clem.) Tischeria quercitella Clem. NEPTICULIDAE Coptotriche malifoliella (Clem.) Coptotriche crataegifoliae (Braun) Ectoedemia platanella (Clem.) Coptotriche roseticola (F&B) Ectoedemia rubifoliella (Clem.) Coptotriche aenea (F&B) Ectoedemia ulmella (Braun) Asterotriche solidaginifoliella (Clem.) Ectoedemia obrutella (Zell.) Asterotriche heliopsisella (Cham.) Ectoedemia grandisella (Cham.) Asterotriche ambrosiaeella (Cham.) Nepticula macrocarpae Free. Asterotriche helianthi (F&B) Stigmella scintillans (Braun) Asterotriche heteroterae (F&B) Stigmella rhoifoliella (Braun) Asterotriche longeciliata (F&B) Stigmella rhamnicola (Braun) Asterotriche omissa (Braun) Stigmella villosella (Clem.) Asterotriche pulvella (Cham.) Stigmella apicialbella (Cham.) Stigmella populetorum (F&B) Stigmella saginella (Clem.) INCURVARIOIDEA Stigmella nigriverticella (Cham.) Stigmella flavipedella (Braun) PRODOXIDAE Stigmella ostryaefoliella (Clem.) Stigmella myricafoliella (Busck) Tegeticula yuccasella (Riley) Stigmella juglandifoliella (Clem.) Tegeticula baccatella Pellmyr Stigmella unifasciella (Cham.) Tegeticula carnerosanella Pellmyr
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-2025 Pennsylvania Wildlife Action Plan
    2 0 1 5 – 2 0 2 5 Species Assessments Appendix 1.1A – Birds A Comprehensive Status Assessment of Pennsylvania’s Avifauna for Application to the State Wildlife Action Plan Update 2015 (Jason Hill, PhD) Assessment of eBird data for the importance of Pennsylvania as a bird migratory corridor (Andy Wilson, PhD) Appendix 1.1B – Mammals A Comprehensive Status Assessment of Pennsylvania’s Mammals, Utilizing NatureServe Ranking Methodology and Rank Calculator Version 3.1 for Application to the State Wildlife Action Plan Update 2015 (Charlie Eichelberger and Joe Wisgo) Appendix 1.1C – Reptiles and Amphibians A Revision of the State Conservation Ranks of Pennsylvania’s Herpetofauna Appendix 1.1D – Fishes A Revision of the State Conservation Ranks of Pennsylvania’s Fishes Appendix 1.1E – Invertebrates Invertebrate Assessment for the 2015 Pennsylvania Wildlife Action Plan Revision 2015-2025 Pennsylvania Wildlife Action Plan Appendix 1.1A - Birds A Comprehensive Status Assessment of Pennsylvania’s Avifauna for Application to the State Wildlife Action Plan Update 2015 Jason M. Hill, PhD. Table of Contents Assessment ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Data Sources ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Species Selection ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Experiment Station
    FALL MANUAL OF PRACTICE IN ECONOMIC ZOOLOGY ' OHIO Agricultural Experiment Station WOOSTER, OHIO, U .S. A., NOVEMBER, 1911. BULLETIN 233 The Bulletins of this Station are sent free to all residents of the S~ r: request them. When a change of address is desired, both the old and the new address should be given. All correspondence should be addressed to EXPERIMENT STATION, Wooster, Ohio OHIO AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION BOARD OF OO:N'rl!.OL G. E. JOBE, President, ••••••••• , ................................ ,, ........ • Cedarville GEORGE E. Sco:r:r •••••• ,, ••••• , •••• , ••• ,., •• ,, ••••••• , ••• ,., •• ,.,,, ••• ,, .Mt. Pleasant CHARLES FLUMEIIFELT • , , , • , •• , , • , • , ••••• , •• , ••• , • , , • , • , • , , , , , , , , , , , , , , • •., •• Old Fort MAIITIN L. RUETENlK .••••••• , •.••••.••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••• , • , • , , • Oleve~and JAMES DEVOL .. , ..... , , • , • , , .... , • , ..... , ............ , , , , , .... ,., , .. ,.,, ... Marlett& STATION STAFF O!IAIILES E. T:a:oiiNlil, M. S. .A.., Direottw NUTRITIOli TB:E DlllECTOil, Chief E. B. FOilllES, Ph. D., Chief' WILLIAM H. KilAMER, Bursar J. 0. HALVEIIIION, Ph. D., Aeltmo Chief W. K. GREENBANK, Librarian J . .A.. ScHULZ, B. S., Assistc.nt CLAIIENClii M. BAKE!I, B. S., Editor E. :S. WELLll, B. S., Assistant AGRONOMY SOILS C. G. WILLIAMS, Associate Director, Chief THE DlllECTOB, Chief F. A. WELTON, M. S., Associate 0. G. WILLIAMS, Associate in soil fertilitu J. B. P .AAB:, .Ph. D, Assooiate1 J. W. AYES, M. S., Asso. in soiZ chemist? 11 WILLIAM HOLYJJS, Farm Manager F. E. BEAR, Ph. D., Assocutte1 0. A. PATTON, Assistant B. S. DAVISSON, M. A, Assistant L. E. THATCB:Eil, Ph. G., Assistant A. BONAZZI, B . .A.gr., Assistant ANIMAL HUSBANDRY J. T. PARSONS, B. A., Assistant• G. W. CONREY, A. M.. Assistant• B. E. CAIIYICHAEJ:., M. S., Chief J. W. HAYMOND, M. S., Assoc.ate FARM MANAGEMENT W.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Pollinating Hawk Moths Declining in the Northeastern United States? an Analysis of Collection Records
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Are pollinating hawk moths declining in the Northeastern United States? An analysis of collection records Bruce E. Young1*, Stephanie Auer1☯, Margaret Ormes1☯, Giovanni Rapacciuolo1,2☯, Dale Schweitzer1,3☯, Nicole Sears1☯ 1 NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, United States of America, 2 Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America, 3 Port Norris, New Jersey, United States of America a1111111111 a1111111111 ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. a1111111111 * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract Increasing attention to pollinators and their role in providing ecosystem services has revealed a paucity of studies on long-term population trends of most insect pollinators in OPEN ACCESS many parts of the world. Because targeted monitoring programs are resource intensive and Citation: Young BE, Auer S, Ormes M, Rapacciuolo G, Schweitzer D, Sears N (2017) Are pollinating unlikely to be performed on most insect pollinators, we took advantage of existing collection hawk moths declining in the Northeastern United records to examine long-term trends in northeastern United States populations of 26 spe- States? An analysis of collection records. PLoS cies of hawk moths (family Sphingidae) that are presumed to be pollinators. We compiled ONE 12(10): e0185683. https://doi.org/10.1371/ over 6,600 records from nine museum and 14 private collections that spanned a 112-year journal.pone.0185683 period, and used logistic generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) to examine long-term Editor: Maohua Chen, Northwest A&F University, population trends. We controlled for uneven sampling effort by adding a covariate for list CHINA length, the number of species recorded during each sampling event.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Modern Threats to the Lepidoptera Fauna in The
    MODERN THREATS TO THE LEPIDOPTERA FAUNA IN THE FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM By THOMSON PARIS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 2011 Thomson Paris 2 To my mother and father who helped foster my love for butterflies 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I thank my family who have provided advice, support, and encouragement throughout this project. I especially thank my sister and brother for helping to feed and label larvae throughout the summer. Second, I thank Hillary Burgess and Fairchild Tropical Gardens, Dr. Jonathan Crane and the University of Florida Tropical Research and Education center Homestead, FL, Elizabeth Golden and Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park, Leroy Rogers and South Florida Water Management, Marshall and Keith at Mack’s Fish Camp, Susan Casey and Casey’s Corner Nursery, and Michael and EWM Realtors Inc. for giving me access to collect larvae on their land and for their advice and assistance. Third, I thank Ryan Fessendon and Lary Reeves for helping to locate sites to collect larvae and for assisting me to collect larvae. I thank Dr. Marc Minno, Dr. Roxanne Connely, Dr. Charles Covell, Dr. Jaret Daniels for sharing their knowledge, advice, and ideas concerning this project. Fourth, I thank my committee, which included Drs. Thomas Emmel and James Nation, who provided guidance and encouragement throughout my project. Finally, I am grateful to the Chair of my committee and my major advisor, Dr. Andrei Sourakov, for his invaluable counsel, and for serving as a model of excellence of what it means to be a scientist.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Native and Non-Native Plants on Urban Insect Communities: Are Native Plants Better Than Non-Natives?
    Impacts of Native and Non-native plants on Urban Insect Communities: Are Native Plants Better than Non-natives? by Carl Scott Clem A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Auburn, Alabama December 12, 2015 Key Words: native plants, non-native plants, caterpillars, natural enemies, associational interactions, congeneric plants Copyright 2015 by Carl Scott Clem Approved by David Held, Chair, Associate Professor: Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Charles Ray, Research Fellow: Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Debbie Folkerts, Assistant Professor: Department of Biological Sciences Robert Boyd, Professor: Department of Biological Sciences Abstract With continued suburban expansion in the southeastern United States, it is increasingly important to understand urbanization and its impacts on sustainability and natural ecosystems. Expansion of suburbia is often coupled with replacement of native plants by alien ornamental plants such as crepe myrtle, Bradford pear, and Japanese maple. Two projects were conducted for this thesis. The purpose of the first project (Chapter 2) was to conduct an analysis of existing larval Lepidoptera and Symphyta hostplant records in the southeastern United States, comparing their species richness on common native and alien woody plants. We found that, in most cases, native plants support more species of eruciform larvae compared to aliens. Alien congener plant species (those in the same genus as native species) supported more species of larvae than alien, non-congeners. Most of the larvae that feed on alien plants are generalist species. However, most of the specialist species feeding on alien plants use congeners of native plants, providing evidence of a spillover, or false spillover, effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Bucculatricidae) from Iran
    J Insect Biodivers Syst 03(4): 347–352 Proof JOURNAL OF INSECT BIODIVERSITY AND SYSTEMATICS Short Paper http://jibs.modares.ac.ir http://zoobank.org/References/ADA92638-E273-4BD3-A1A9-8CD9051ED841 First report of Bucculatrix albella Stainton, 1867 (Lepidoptera: Bucculatricidae) from Iran Helen Alipanah1* and Saeed Moodi2 1 Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection (IRIPP), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran. 2 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, University of Birjand. ABSTRACT. Bucculatrix albella Stainton is newly reported for the fauna of Received: Iran. The species is collected in Khorasan-e Jonubi and Zanjan Provinces as 05 November, 2017 larvae and cocoon, and adult, respectively. In the former Province it was Accepted: found on red date, Ziziphus jujuba Miller (Rosales: Rhamnaceae) in some 21 November, 2017 orchards of Birjand during 2015-2016. This species may be considered as a severe pest of jujube in Iran in the future. Published: 22 November 2017 Key words: Bucculatricidae, Bucculatrix albella, leaf miner, jujube, Ziziphus Subject Editor: jujuba, new record, Iran Zdenko Tokár Citation: Alipanah, H. & Moodi, S. (2017) First report of Bucculatrix albella Stainton, 1867 (Lepidoptera: Bucculatricidae) from Iran. Journal of Insect Biodiversity and Systematics, 3 (4), 347–352. Introduction The family Bucculatricidae with almost 297 happens at the third and fourth larval described species in four genera worldwide instars on the surface of the leaf, and then (van Nieukerken et al., 2011) is mostly skeletonizing it (Braun, 1963; Kuroko, 1964). represented in the Nearctic Region (Braun, The larvae spin an elongated, longitudinally 1963). Majority of its species are leaf miners ribbed cocoon on the leaf or branch in their early instars, and becoming either (Kuroko, 1964, 1982).
    [Show full text]