RNA–RNA Interactions and Pre-Mrna Mislocalization As Drivers of Group II Intron Loss from Nuclear Genomes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
RNA–RNA interactions and pre-mRNA mislocalization as drivers of group II intron loss from nuclear genomes Guosheng Qua, Xiaolong Donga, Carol Lyn Piazzaa, Venkata R. Chalamcharlab,1, Sheila Lutzb, M. Joan Curciob, and Marlene Belforta,2 aDepartment of Biological Sciences, RNA Institute, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY 12222; and bWadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12201-2002 Contributed by Marlene Belfort, March 10, 2014 (sent for review January 22, 2014; reviewed by Lynne Maquat and Roy Parker) Group II introns are commonly believed to be the progenitors of and the spliced mRNA (S-mRNA) are subject to nonsense- spliceosomal introns, but they are notably absent from nuclear mediated decay (NMD) and translational repression, respectively genomes. Barriers to group II intron function in nuclear genomes (12) (Fig. S1). Strikingly, this intron-stimulated gene silencing is therefore beg examination. A previous study showed that nuclear unique to group II introns, with neither group I nor spliceosomal expression of a group II intron in yeast results in nonsense- introns in the same location having any effect on RNA stability mediated decay and translational repression of mRNA, and that or translation (12). Here, we investigated possible mechanisms these roadblocks to expression are group II intron-specific. To for group II intron-specific gene silencing in yeast. Our data determine the molecular basis for repression of gene expression, demonstrate strong mRNA–pre-mRNA interactions and RNA we investigated cellular dynamics of processed group II intron miscompartmentalization, reflected in export of the pre-mRNA RNAs, from transcription to cellular localization. Our data show to the cytoplasm and its localization to cytoplasmic foci, possibly pre-mRNA mislocalization to the cytoplasm, where the RNAs are including processing bodies (PBs) and stress granules (SGs). – targeted to foci. Furthermore, tenacious mRNA pre-mRNA interac- Both phenomena result in a reduction in the abundance of tions, based on intron-exon binding sequences, result in reduced mRNAs from which group II introns were removed and a re- abundance of spliced mRNAs. Nuclear retention of pre-mRNA pre- duction of gene expression. This work supports a relationship vents this interaction and relieves these expression blocks. In between nucleus-cytoplasm compartmentalization and evolution addition to providing a mechanistic rationale for group II intron- of gene-silencing group II introns into spliceosomal introns in specific repression, our data support the hypothesis that RNA si- nuclear genomes. lencing of the host gene contributed to expulsion of group II introns from nuclear genomes and drove the evolution of Results spliceosomal introns. RNA Modification and Processing Are Normal. In eukaryotic cells, mRNA translation can be regulated at multiple levels, from the intron-mediated nuclear gene silencing | spliceosomal intron evolution processing of the transcript, through RNA–RNA or RNA–protein interactions, to cellular localization. Aberrations at any step could roup II introns that reside in genomes of bacteria, archaea, account for reduced expression of spliced mRNA (S-mRNA) Gand eukaryotic organelles are ribozymes that self-splice that previously contained a group II intron. We therefore first from pre-mRNA transcripts independent of protein catalysis examined the nature of RNA transcripts from a construct used – (1 3). Group II introns are also mobile retroelements that in- as a group II intron-splicing reporter (12) (Fig. 1A and Fig. S2A). tegrate into DNAs via an RNA intermediate (2, 3). Group II intron splicing is usually facilitated in vivo by an intron-encoded protein Significance that acts as a maturase to help form the required secondary and tertiary structures (3). The intron RNA–protein complex is also required for group II intron retromobility. Both splicing and mo- For over three decades, group II introns have been conjectured bility of group II introns require interactions between exon-binding to be the ancestors of splicesomal introns, but there are no sequences (EBSs) within the intron and intron-binding sequences group II introns in extant nuclear genomes. Might these introns (IBSs) in the flanking exons of RNA or DNA targets (2, 3). have been expunged as spliceosomal introns proliferated? We The chemical steps of group II intron splicing are identical showed previously that nuclear expression of a group II intron to those of nuclear spliceosomal introns (4, 5). There are also in yeast resulted specifically in down-regulation of its host gene. similarities of RNA sequences at the splice sites and of RNA Here, we report on the discovery that pre-mRNA mislocalization and a consequent interaction between the pre-mRNA or intron structures within the ribozyme and the spliceosome (6–9). Be- and spliced mRNA together account for the mechanism of gene cause of these parallels, the catalytic group II introns are be- silencing. Our data support the hypothesis that such road- lieved to be the progenitors of spliceosomal introns (6, 10, 11). It blocks to gene expression resulted in purging of group II is widely speculated that group II introns entered the eukaryotic introns from nuclear genomes while promoting the evolution lineage with the mitochondrial endosymbiosis, invaded the nu- of spliceosomal introns. cleus, and evolved from RNA catalysts into efficient spliceosome- dependent introns. However, group II introns are strikingly ab- Author contributions: G.Q. and M.B. designed research; G.Q., X.D., C.L.P., and V.R.C. sent from modern nuclear genomes (1), which are replete with performed research; S.L. and M.J.C. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; G.Q. and spliceosomal introns. It is still elusive how the ancestral group II M.B. analyzed data; and G.Q. and M.B. wrote the paper. introns might have evolved into spliceosomal introns or how they Reviewers: L.M., University of Rochester; and R.P., University of Colorado Boulder. were expunged from nuclear genomes. The authors declare no conflict of interest. As an initial effort to answer these questions, we had probed See Commentary on page 6536. the fate of group II introns introduced into RNA polymerase II 1Present address: Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, National Cancer transcripts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (12). We used LtrB, a Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892. group II intron from Lactococcus lactis, as a model. That work 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. showed that the group II intron splices accurately and efficiently, This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. albeit in the cytoplasm, and that the intron-containing pre-mRNA 1073/pnas.1404276111/-/DCSupplemental. 6612–6617 | PNAS | May 6, 2014 | vol. 111 | no. 18 www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1404276111 Downloaded by guest on October 1, 2021 A SA the streptavidin resin. No C-mRNA bound to the resin (Fig. 1 B, ii SEE COMMENTARY Pre-mRNA E1 E2 CUP1 Myc ), supporting the conclusion that the unspliced precursor and the S-mRNA interact in vivo. Splicing Group II intron interferes with S-mRNA expression. Considering se- quence complementarities between IBSs in the exons and EBSs in the intron (Fig. 2A, Left), we hypothesized that an interaction S-mRNA E1 E2 CUP1 Myc between pre-mRNA or excised intron and S-mRNA might re- C-mRNA E1 E2 CUP1 Myc press S-mRNA expression (Fig. 2A, Right). To test this hypoth- esis, an intron-containing ORF fused to URA3 (Fig. 2B, GpII- B (i) Intron Ex2 URA3) was coexpressed with C-mRNA, containing ligated exons fused to CUP1 (Figs. 1A and 2B). The resulting strain showed GCGGUACCUCCCUACUUCAC CAUAUCAUUUUU Pre-mRNA 40 slightly less resistance to copper than a strain in which C-mRNA UCGUGAACACAUCCAUAAC CAUAUCAUUUUU mRNA was coexpressed with an intronless URA3 counterpart (Fig. 2C, 38 compare rows 1 and 2). A more dramatic result was observed Ex1 when LtrA was expressed (Fig. 2C, rows 3 and 4). It is unclear if (ii) (iii) the LtrA effect is due to excision of the intron, which interacts S- mRNA C- mRNA Avidin 0X 1X 4X 8X 16X Mock L F B L F B B U B U B U B U B U with the S-mRNA; to RNA binding by LtrA, which could affect the phenotype; or to an observed slowing of cellular growth caused by LtrA expression. Regardless, the phenotypic difference between isogenic intron-containing and intron-lacking strains is consistent with the expectation that the group II intron represses – % 65 75 65 65 61 C-mRNA expression by RNA RNA interactions. To relate phe- notypes to gene expression levels, Cup1 protein (Cup1p) and Fig. 1. mRNA–pre-mRNA interactions. (A) Schematic of RNA aptamer- mRNA levels, respectively, were monitored by Western blotting harboring construct. Pre-mRNA bears the ΔORF variant of the LtrB intron and RT. Coexpression of the group II intron from GpII-URA3 (black line), which is flanked by exon 1 and exon 2 (E1 and E2) and fused to RNA (Fig. 2D, lane 2) caused the protein product of C-mRNA to the CUP1 ORF containing a C-terminal Myc tag (12). The mRNA generated decrease to 47% of that in the strain expressing the intronless from splicing (S-mRNA) has the same RNA sequence as the intron-lacking C-mRNA (12). The streptavidin aptamer (SA) in the intron was used as an URA3 (Fig. 2D, lane 1; control C1 and C2 contain plasmids affinity tag for pre-mRNA purification. (B)mRNA–pre-mRNA interactions in expressing only CUP1 C-mRNA or the group II intron, respec- vivo. (i) RT termination assay. Affinity-purified RNAs were detected as per tively). Interestingly, coexpression of the intron-bearing RNA the schematic (12) with a primer that terminates differentially at the sites also led to a significant decrease of abundance of both C-mRNA depicted by black ovals.