Thesis Structural Evolution of the Potosí Uplift, Sierra
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THESIS STRUCTURAL EVOLUTION OF THE POTOSÍ UPLIFT, SIERRA MADRE ORIENTAL, NORTHEASTERN MEXICO Submitted by Stewart Alexander Williams Department of Geosciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2019 Master’s Committee: Advisor: John Singleton John Ridley Melinda Laituri Copyright by Stewart Alexander Williams 2019 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT STRUCTURAL EVOLUTION OF THE POTOSÍ UPLIFT, SIERRA MADRE ORIENTAL, NORTHEASTERN MEXICO The Jurassic Minas Viejas Formation is host to a Late Cretaceous to early Paleogene-aged décollement in the Sierra Madre Oriental, Mexico. The Minas Viejas Formation is dominated by rheologically-weak evaporite that accommodated thin-skinned deformation, forming the Sierra Madre Oriental fold-thrust belt with minimal deformation to the underlying Triassic-Jurassic red beds. Thin-skinned shortening above the décollement temporally transitioned to thick-skinned shortening, resulting in exhumation of the décollement and development of the Potosí uplift, one of the largest and well exposed thick-skinned uplifts in the orogen. Detailed geologic mapping and structural analysis provide insight into the geometry and kinematics of the Potosí uplift, and (U-Th)/He thermochronometry and vitrinite reflectance record the burial history and timing of exhumation associated with the uplift. Thick-skinned deformation involved folding of sub-décollement strata into a NNW-SSE- striking anticlinorium, development of cleavage, ENE-WSW directed thrust faulting, conjugate strike-slip faulting, and formation of ENE-WSW-striking extension fractures associated with barite mineralization. These structures consistently record ENE-directed subhorizontal shortening. Shortening is directed ~062° in the southern part of the uplift and ~077° in the northern part of ii the uplift. Thick-skinned deformation modified pre-existing geometries of thin-skinned folds involving Cretaceous overburden strata above the Jurassic evaporite décollement. Zircon (U-Th)/He cooling dates (ZHe) and vitrinite reflectance data indicate that the entire evaporite décollement was buried to ≥185°C, consistent with development of phyllitic fabrics in the basal part of the Minas Viejas Formation. Paleocene to mid-Eocene zircon (U-Th)/He cooling dates in the Triassic-Jurassic red beds below the evaporite décollement directly record the timing of exhumation associated with thick-skinned deformation, and suggest that the thick-skinned uplift was a continuation of earlier thin-skinned shortening as opposed to a distinct tectonic event. A zircon (U-Th)/He date from the southern Potosí uplift is ~66 Ma, whereas ZHe dates in the northern part of the uplift range from ~49–43 Ma. Two samples from the nearby Aramberri uplift to the south of the Potosí uplift have mean ZHe dates of ~63–54 Ma. The transition from thin- to thick-skinned shortening may be attributed to the evolution of mechanical stratigraphy in the décollement. Thin-skinned detachment folding resulted in significant migration of evaporite away from synclinal keels, effectively eliminating a planar weak zone at the base of the décollement and creating salt welds between carbonates or shales within the décollement with underlying red beds. The along-strike differences in timing of thick-skinned exhumation and the shortening directions may also be attributed to differences in mechanical stratigraphy. Thicker intervals of evaporite in the northern part of the uplift allowed thin-skinned shortening to continue while the southern part of the uplift transitioned to thick-skinned shortening as the weak evaporite décollement was exhausted. As a result, stress-strain trajectories in the northern part of the uplift refracted clockwise towards the area with more propagation of deformation. iii Our findings provide a new insight into the geometry, kinematics, and timing of deformation associated with the Potosí uplift, and may provide a framework for studying other thick-skinned uplifts in the Sierra Madre Oriental, and more generally orogenic belts that record a transition in deformation styles. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, unbelievably huge thanks to Dr. John Singleton, my advisor. He was an invaluable resource, a wealth of knowledge, and constantly pushed to make the project better. He taught me there were always more measurements to take to strengthen the dataset, and to strive to present the best possible product I could. His constant optimism was a necessary aspect to this project. I thank my committee members, Dr. John Ridley and Dr. Melinda Laituri, for providing feedback on the thesis, elevating this project to a higher level through their experience and expertise. I thank the Singleton Research Group, my dear friends Skyler Mavor, Nikki Seymour, and Mike Prior, for being examples of extraordinary geologists and for being wonderful friends. Special thanks to Crossy for coming out and showing us around Mexico. He laid the foundations for this project and showed me just how wild evaporite structures can be. I thank my field assistants, Blake Franklin, Mike Wyatt, and Oscar Vazquez, for joining me in the middle of Mexico to look at some rocks, get stung by cacti, and live amongst the goats for weeks at a time. I thank Aliza Risby, my partner and anchor, for standing by me through thick and thin. I owe thanks to the graduate students in the Department of Geosciences for providing me with valuable friendship and support. And finally, this project wouldn’t have been possible if not for the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund’s New Directions Grant. v DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to my sister, who has always been there for me. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .........................................................................................................................................ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................... v DEDICATION .................................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................ ix LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................... x INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 GEOLOGIC BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 4 1. Thin-skinned Shortening .................................................................................................. 4 2. Thick-skinned Uplift .......................................................................................................... 7 3. The Potosí Uplift ............................................................................................................. 10 METHODS ...................................................................................................................................... 14 4. Geologic Mapping of the Potosí Uplift ........................................................................... 14 5. Geometric and Kinematic Analysis ................................................................................. 15 6. Analysis of Burial and Exhumation History .................................................................... 16 6.1. (U-Th)/He Thermochronometry ................................................................................. 16 6.2. Vitrinite Reflectance ................................................................................................... 17 STRATIGRAPHY .............................................................................................................................. 19 7. Upper Triassic El Alamar Formation ............................................................................... 19 8. Upper Jurassic La Joya Formation .................................................................................. 22 9. Upper Jurassic Minas Viejas Formation ......................................................................... 24 9.1. Basal Stratigraphy of the Minas Viejas Formation – The La Nieve and Río de San José Members ............................................................................................................................... 28 10. Upper Jurassic – Cretaceous Strata ................................................................................ 32 10.1. Upper Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous La Casita Formation ....................................... 32 10.2. Lower Cretaceous Taraises Formation ................................................................... 33 10.3. Lower Cretaceous Tamaulipas Group ..................................................................... 34 10.4. Undifferentiated Upper Cretaceous Carbonates .................................................... 35 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY OF THE POTOSÍ UPLIFT ........................................................................... 36 vii 11. Structures within the Jurassic-Cretaceous Overburden ................................................ 36 12. Structures within the Minas Viejas Formation Décollement ......................................... 44 12.1. Supradécollement ..................................................................................................