DOCSLIB.ORG

Cuesta Del Cura Limestone

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cuesta Del Cura Limestone BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 49, PP. 1651-1694. 7 PLS., 6 FIGS. NOVEM BER 1, 1938 STUDIES OF THE MEXICAN GEOSYNCLINE BY EALPH W. IMLAY CONTENTS Page Abstract....................................................................................................................................... 1652 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 1652 Acknowledgments..................................................................................................................... 1654 Earlier investigations............................................................................................................... 1654 Geography................................................................................................................................... 1654 Topography and drainage.............................................................................................. 1654 Culture................................................................................................................................ 1655 Sedimentary rocks..................................................................................................................... 1657 General discussion.......................................................................................................... 1657 Jurassic system................................................................................................................. 1657 Zuloaga limestone.......................................................................... „............ 1657 La Caja formation................................................................................................... 1659 Correlation............................................................; ................................................ 1662 Cretaceous system.................................................................; ......................................... 1662 Taraises formation................................................................................................... 1662 Cupido limestone..................................................................................................... 1662 La Pefia formation.................................................................................................. 1663 Cuesta del Cura limestone.................................................................................... 1664 Indidura formation.................................................................................................. 1665 Caracol formation.................................................................................................... 1666 Parras shale............................................................................................................... 1667 Quaternary system........................................................................................................... 1667 Mayrdn formation................................................................................................... 1667 Igneous and metamorphic rocks........................................................................................... 1670 Structural units in northern Zacatecas and southern Coahuila................................... 1672 General features................................................................................................................ 1672 Folds.................................................................................................................................... 1672 Atajo Anticline......................................................................................................... 1672 Yeso Anticline.......................................................................................................... 1673 Sombreretillo Anticline.......................................................................................... 1673 Zuloaga Anticline..................................................................................................... 1675 Canutillo, La Caja, and Santa Rosa Anticlines.............................................. 1675 Los Alamos Anticline............................................................................................. 1675 Ramirez Anticline.................................................................................................... 1675 Faults................................................................................................................................... 1676 Mineral Deposits....................................................................................................................... 1676 Comparison of facies in Mexican geosyncline................................................................... 1677 Upper Jurassic................................................................................................................... 1677 La Gloria formation and Zuloaga limestone.................................................... 1677 La Casita and La Caja formations..................................................................... 1683 Cretaceous.......................................................................................................................... 1687 Taraises formation................................................................................................... 1687 (1651) 1652 R. W. IMLAY— MEXICAN GEOSYNCLINE Page Las Vigas, Parritas, and Cupido formations.................................................... 1687 La Peña formation................................................................................................... 1689 Aurora and Cuesta del Cura limestones............................................................ 1690 Indidura, Cuesta del Cura, and Caracol formations..................................... 1691 Parras shale and Difunta formation................................................................... 1692 Works to which reference is made........................................................................................ 1692 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Index map of northern Mexico...................................................................................... 1653 2. Stratigraphic sections in the Mexican geosyncline.................................................. 1658 3. Principal structural features........................................................................................... 1674 4. Stratigraphic sections along northern part of the Mexican geosyncline........... 1678 5. Northern part of Mexican geosyncline at close of Cretaceous sedimentation.. 1686 6. Time relations of facies in the Mexican geosyncline............................................. 1689 Plate Facing page 1. Mountains........................................................................................................................... 1660 2. Formations and faults...................................................................................................... 1661 3. Formations.......................................................................................................................... 1666 4. Sierra Jimulco.................................................................................................................... 1667 5. Contacts............................................................................................................................... 1668 6. Mayrán conglomerates..................................................................................................... 1669 7. Geologic map of the Melchor Ocampo area.............................................................. 1672 ABSTRACT The Melchor (San Pedro) Ocampo region lies on the boundary of Coahuila and Zacatecas in the central part of a broad belt of eastward-trending folds characterized by strong asymmetry. In contrast to the region farther north, the Jurassic limestone is extensively developed and forms the highest parts of the mountain ranges; the Cretaceous rocks form the foothills. About 100 square miles adjacent to Melchor Ocampo was studied intensively as a foundation for reconnaissance studies in adjoin­ ing areas. During the Upper Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous epochs the distribution of marine facies of deposition was controlled by erosion from the Coahuila Peninsula to the north. The seaward margins of the clastic facies and the limestone reef facies ap­ proximately coincide with the southern side of the Sierras de Parras and Jimulco. Facies' of Upper Cretaceous marine sedimentation were controlled by rising land masses in central Mexico, as shown by increasing thickness of clastics toward the south.. Folding in northern Zacatecas involves both the Jurassic and the Cretaceous beds and apparently occurred at the same time as that farther north. The Jurassic forma­ tions become progressively more elevated toward the south and in general are as intensely folded as the Lower Cretaceous formations of the Sierras de Parras and Jimulco in Coahuila. The greater height of the ranges bordering the site of the Coahuila Peninsula (e.g., Sierras de Parras, Jimulco, Rosario) than that of the ranges farther south, is ascribed (1) to the presence of the thick rudistid-bearing Aurora limestone, and (2) perhaps to less intense orogeny with consequent less effective erosion. INTRODUCTION The Melchor (San Pedro) Ocampo area in north-central Mexico on the boundary of Coahuila and Zacatecas
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stratigraphy, Paleontology and Correlation of Lower Cretaceous Exposures in Southeastern New Mexico Barry S
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/44 Stratigraphy, paleontology and correlation of lower Cretaceous exposures in southeastern New Mexico Barry S. Kues and Spencer G. Lucas, 1993, pp. 245-260 in: Carlsbad Region (New Mexico and West Texas), Love, D. W.; Hawley, J. W.; Kues, B. S.; Austin, G. S.; Lucas, S. G.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 44th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 357 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1993 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks.
    [Show full text]
  • First Occurrence of a Gigantic Pliosaurid Plesiosaur in The
    Bull. Soc. géol. Fr., 2003, t. 174, no 3, pp. 271-278 First occurrence of a gigantic pliosaurid plesiosaur in the late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) of Mexico MARIE-CÉLINE BUCHY1,EBERHARD FREY2,WOLFGANG STINNESBECK1 &JOSÉ GUADALUPE LÓPEZ-OLIVA3 Key words. – Kimmeridgian, Pliosauridae, Mexico, Palaeobiogeography. Abstract. – Reinvestigation of a partial vertebral column from the Kimmeridgian La Caja Formation of Mexico, housed in the University of Linares (Mexico), and previously attributed to a dinosaur, proves to be from a very large pliosaurid plesiosaur. This specimen represents the first plesiosaur described from the Jurassic of Mexico. Its length has been esti- mated at 15 metres and, as a juvenile, is considered to be one of the largest Jurassic marine reptiles. The remains of this animal are here described. The morphology of the vertebral column is not diagnostic beyond family level. Large pliosaur vertebrae of a similar size are known from the Upper Jurassic of Europe, and are often referred to the genera Liopleurodon or Simolestes but these identifications are based only upon the size of the centra and have no taxonomic justification. A portion of rostrum with teeth was discovered together with the vertebral column but is unfortunately now lost. The Mexican pliosaur fills geographical and chronological gaps between western Tethys and South American pliosaurs, and is an additional support to the hypothesis of a Hispanic corridor linking at least temporarily the NW Euro- pean marine province with the western South American marine (Pacific) realm during the late Jurassic. Première occurrence d’un plésiosaure pliosauride géant dans le Jurassique supérieur (Kimméridgien) du Mexique Mots clés.
    [Show full text]
  • New and Poorly Known Perisphinctoidea (Ammonitina) from the Upper Tithonian of Le Chouet (Drôme, SE France)
    Volumina Jurassica, 2014, Xii (1): 113–128 New and poorly known Perisphinctoidea (Ammonitina) from the Upper Tithonian of Le Chouet (Drôme, SE France) Luc G. BULOT1, Camille FRAU2, William A.P. WIMBLEDON3 Key words: Ammonoidea, Ataxioceratidae, Himalayitidae, Neocomitidae, Upper Tithonian, Le Chouet, South-East France. Abstract. The aim of this paper is to document the ammonite fauna of the upper part of the Late Tithonian collected at the key section of Le Chouet (Drôme, SE France). Emphasis is laid on new and poorly known Ataxioceratidae, Himalayitidae and Neocomitidae from the upper part of the Tithonian. Among the Ataxioceratidae, a new account on the taxonomy and relationship between Paraulacosphinctes Schindewolf and Moravisphinctes Tavera is presented. Regarding the Himalayitidae, the range and content of Micracanthoceras Spath is discussed and two new genera are introduced: Ardesciella gen. nov., for a group of Mediterranean ammonites that is homoeomorphic with the Andean genus Corongoceras Spath, and Pratumidiscus gen. nov. for a specimen that shows morphological similarities with the Boreal genera Riasanites Spath and Riasanella Mitta. Finally, the occurrence of Neocomitidae in the uppermost Tithonian is documented by the presence of the reputedly Berriasian genera Busnardoiceras Tavera and Pseudargentiniceras Spath. INTRODUCTION known Perisphinctoidea from the Upper Tithonian of this reference section. Additional data on the Himalayitidae in- The unique character of the ammonite fauna of Le Chouet cluding the description and discussion of Boughdiriella (near Les Près, Drôme, France) (Fig. 1) has already been chouetensis gen. nov. sp. nov. are to be published elsewhere outlined by Le Hégarat (1973), but, so far, only a handful of (Frau et al., 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Boletín De La Asociación Mexicana De Geólogos Petroleros, A.C
    BOLETÍN DE LA ASOCIACIÓN MEXICANA DE GEÓLOGOS PETROLEROS, A.C. VOLUMEN LXII NÚMERO 1 ENERO-JUNIO 2020 NÚMERO 1, ENERO-JUNIO 2020. N 1300 El Madrono 00 16 0 0 1400 2 1 1100 1300 La Anacahuita 1200 1100 10 00 9 00 El Huizachal ‘ 1 4 0 0 1 300 1200 0 1100 0 0 1 La Joya Verde 1000 Cementerio 1 000 Aguas de Minas 0021 1200 13 1100 00 1400 12 00 1300 Explanation Undifferentiated Cretaceous strata (Ku) La Casita Formation (Jc) Olvido Formation (Jo) Novillo Formation (Jn) BOLETÍN DE LA ASOCIACIÓN MEXICANA GEÓLOGOS PETROLEROS, A.C. VOLUMEN LXII, La Joya Formation (Jlj) Rhyollite (Ji) La Boca Formation La Boca Formation upper member (Jlbs) lower member (Jlbi) Geologic contact Locality Symbols Inferred geological Coordinate system: UTM contact School Topografic base map from INEGI: CiudadVioctoria F-14-A-20 INSTRUCCIONES A LOS AUTORES El Boletín de la Asociación Mexicana de Geólogos Petroleros es una publicación semestral dedicada a la divulgación de artículos sobre geología, especialmente aquellos relacionados con la aplicación de las geociencias a la industria petrolera. Los trabajos factibles a publicarse se pueden dividir en tres tipos principales: Reportes de investigación originales, no publicados con anterioridad, que no excedan de 25 cuartillas. Notas técnicas originales que no excedan de 10 cuartillas. Notas técnicas de divulgación que no exceden de 10 cuartillas. Los trabajos deberán enviarse a: COMISIÓN DE ESTUDIOS TÉCNICOS Ernesto Cabalero García [email protected] Leonardo Enrique Aguilera Gómez [email protected] Dionisio Figueroa Rodríguez [email protected] En caso de que el trabajo sea aceptado, la Comisión de Estudios Técnicos turnará el mismo a la Comisión Editorial, quien se encargará de su preparación y adecuación para su publicación.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Invasive Imaging Methods Applied to Neo- and Paleo-Ontological Cephalopod Research
    Biogeosciences, 11, 2721–2739, 2014 www.biogeosciences.net/11/2721/2014/ doi:10.5194/bg-11-2721-2014 © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Non-invasive imaging methods applied to neo- and paleo-ontological cephalopod research R. Hoffmann1, J. A. Schultz2, R. Schellhorn2, E. Rybacki3, H. Keupp4, S. R. Gerden1, R. Lemanis1, and S. Zachow5 1Institut für Geologie, Mineralogie und Geophysik, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Universitätsstrasse 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany 2Steinmann-Institut für Geologie, Mineralogie und Paläontologie, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Nussallee 8, 53115 Bonn, Germany 3Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ Sektion 3.2, Geomechanik und Rheologie, Telegrafenberg, D 429, 14473 Potsdam, Germany 4Institut für Geologische Wissenschaften, Fachrichtung Paläontologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Malteserstrasse 74–100, 12249 Berlin, Germany 5Zuse Institut Berlin, Takustrasse 7, 14195 Berlin, Germany Correspondence to: R. Hoffmann ([email protected]) Received: 28 October 2013 – Published in Biogeosciences Discuss.: 29 November 2013 Revised: 14 March 2014 – Accepted: 29 March 2014 – Published: 22 May 2014 Abstract. Several non-invasive methods are common prac- tially preserved within the surrounding rocks, requires imag- tice in natural sciences today. Here we present how they ing methods that are primarily used in non-destructive test- can be applied and contribute to current topics in cephalo- ing. The conservation of the specimen is of main importance pod (paleo-) biology. Different methods will be compared in using these methods since former techniques used destruc- terms of time necessary to acquire the data, amount of data, tive methods leading to the loss of the specimen or parts accuracy/resolution, minimum/maximum size of objects that of the specimen.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphological Studies of the Sedimentary Cuddapah Basin, Andhra Pradesh, South India
    SSRG International Journal of Geoinformatics and Geological Science (SSRG-IJGGS) – Volume 7 Issue 2 – May – Aug 2020 Geomorphological studies of the Sedimentary Cuddapah Basin, Andhra Pradesh, South India Maheswararao. R1, Srinivasa Gowd. S1*, Harish Vijay. G1, Krupavathi. C1, Pradeep Kumar. B1 Dept. of Geology, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa-516005, Andhra Pradesh, India Abstract: The crescent shaped Cuddapah basin located Annamalai Surface - at an altitude of over 8000’ (2424 mainly in the southern part of Andhra Pradesh and a m), ii. Ootacamund Surface – at 6500’-7500’ (1969- little in the Telangana State is one of the Purana 2272 m) on the west and at 3500’ (1060m) on the east basins. Extensive work was carried out on the as noticed in Tirumala hills, iii. Karnataka Surface - stratigraphy of the basin, but there is very little 2700’-3000’ (Vaidynathan, 1964). 2700-3300 reference (Vaidynathan,1964) on the geomorphology of (Subramanian, 1973) 2400-3000 (Radhakrishna, 1976), the basin. Hence, an attempt is made to present the iv. Hyderabad Surface – at 1600’ – 2000’v. Coastal geomorphology of the unique basin. The Major Surface – well developed east of the basin.vi. Fossil Geomorphic units correspond to geological units. The surface: The unconformity between the sediments of the important Physiographic units of the Cuddapah basin Cuddapah basin and the granitic basement is similar to are Palakonda hill range, Seshachalam hill range, ‘Fossil Surface’. Gandikota hill range, Velikonda hill range, Nagari hills, Pullampet valley and Kundair valley. In the Cuddapah Basin there are two major river systems Key words: Topography, Land forms, Denudational, namely, the Penna river system and the Krishna river Pediment zone, Fluvial.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey
    DEPABTMENT OF THE INTEKIOR BULLETIN OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY N~o. 151 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1898 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIEECTOR THE LOWER CRETACEOUS GRYPMAS OF THK TEX.AS REGION ROBERT THOMAS HILL THOMAS WAYLA'ND VAUGHAN WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 18.98 THE LOWER CRETACEOUS GRYPHJ1AS OF THE TEXAS REGION. BY I EOBEET THOMAS HILL and THOMAS WAYLAND VAUGHAN. CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittal....._..........._....._ ............................ 11 Introduction ...---._._....__................._....._.__............._...._ 13 The fossil oysters of the Texas region.._._.._.___._-..-._._......-..--.... 23 Classification of the Ostreidae. .. ...-...---..-.......-.....-.-............ 24 Historical statement of the discovery in the Texas region of the forms referred to Gryphsea pitcher! Morton ................................ 33 Gryphaea corrugata Say._______._._..__..__...__.,_._.________...____.._ 33 Gryphsea pitcheri Morton............................................... 34 Roemer's Gryphsea pitcheri............................................ 35 Marcou's Gryphsea pitcheri............................................ 35 Blake's Gryphaea pitcheri............................................. 36 Schiel's Gryphsea pitcheri...........................,.:................ 36 Hall's Gryphsea pitcheri (= G. dilatata var. tucumcarii Marcou) ...... 36 Heilprin's Gryphaea pitcheri.....'..................................... 37 Gryphaea pitcheri var. hilli Cragin...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Jurassicelower Cretaceous Stratigraphy in South-Eastern Tibet: a Comparison with the Western Himalayas
    Author's personal copy Cretaceous Research 29 (2008) 301e315 www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes Upper JurassiceLower Cretaceous stratigraphy in south-eastern Tibet: a comparison with the western Himalayas Xiumian Hu a,*, Luba Jansa b, Chengshan Wang c a State Key Laboratory of Mineral Deposits Research, Department of Earth Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China b Department of Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax B3H 3J5, Canada c Geological Centre for Tibetan Plateau, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, P.R. China Received 24 January 2007; accepted in revised form 14 May 2007 Available online 28 November 2007 Abstract Lithostratigraphic studies of the Upper JurassiceLower Cretaceous sedimentary successions exposed in the TingrieGyangze area, south- eastern Tibet resulted in the establishment of a revised stratigraphic framework. A major crustal fault separates the southern Tibetan sedimentary successions into a Southern Zone and a Northern Zone. The Upper JurassiceLower Cretaceous strata of the Southern Zone are subdivided into the Menkadun Formation (Oxfordian, Kimmeridgian, up to lower Upper Tithonian), the Gucuo Formation (Upper Tithonian to Lower Albian) and the overlying Dongshan Formation (Upper Albian). The Gucuo Formation is further subdivided into a quartz arenite unit, which is overlain by a shale unit, in turn overlain by a volcaniclastic sandstone unit. The youngest cluster of detrital zircon absolute age data (127.7 Æ 1.8 Ma) from the lower part of the volcaniclastic unit of the Gucuo Formation place the volcanic event before the Late Barremian. In the Northern Zone, the Upper JurassiceLower Cretaceous strata have been subdivided into four formations: the Zhera Formation (Upper Jurassic), the Weimei Formation (Tithonian), the Rilang Formation (?Berriasian) and the Gyabula Formation (? post-Valanginian).
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Carbon Isotope Chemostratigraphy of Late Jurassic Early Cretaceous Arctic Canada
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences Finding the VOICE: organic carbon isotope chemostratigraphy of Late Jurassic Early Cretaceous Arctic Canada Galloway, JM http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/15324 10.1017/s0016756819001316 Geological Magazine Cambridge University Press (CUP) All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. Proof Delivery Form Geological Magazine Date of delivery: Journal and vol/article ref: geo 1900131 Number of pages (not including this page): 15 This proof is sent to you on behalf of Cambridge University Press. Please check the proofs carefully. Make any corrections necessary on a hardcopy and answer queries on each page of the proofs Please return the marked proof within 2 days of receipt to: [email protected] Authors are strongly advised to read these proofs thoroughly because any errors missed may appear in the final published paper. This will be your ONLY chance to correct your proof. Once published, either online or in print, no further changes can be made. To avoid delay from overseas, please send the proof by airmail or courier. If you have no corrections to make, please email [email protected] to save having to return your paper proof. If corrections are light, you can also send them by email, quoting both page and line number.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lower Cretaceous Mass Occurrence of Ammonoids – Implications on Taphonomy and Stratigraphy (Valanginian; Northern Calcareous Alps; Austria) A
    Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 7, 06317, 2005 SRef-ID: 1607-7962/gra/EGU05-A-06317 © European Geosciences Union 2005 A Lower Cretaceous mass occurrence of ammonoids – implications on taphonomy and stratigraphy (Valanginian; Northern Calcareous Alps; Austria) A. Lukeneder Natural History Museum, Department of Geology and Paleontology, Burgring 7, A-1014 Vienna, Austria ([email protected] / Fax: +43 (1) 52177-459 / Phone: +43 (1) 52177-583) Lower Cretaceous pelagic sediments are known to form a major element of the Staufen-Höllengebirgs Nappe. Valanginian to Hauterivian cephalopod-bearing de- posits are recorded in two different facies, the Schrambach and the Rossfeld forma- tions. Upper Valanginian sediments of the Rossfeld Formation are mainly composed of turbiditic sandstone intercalations, whereas the Rossfeld Formation comprises tur- biditic marls and sandstones (Immel 1987).The stratigraphy of the Lower Cretaceous sediments in the investigated area is based on ammonoids. The Upper Valanginian succession of southernmost part of Upper Austria was de- posited in an unstable shelf setting characterized by thick sandstone units that re- flect transgressive histories combined by tectonic events (see FAUPL 1979). The terrigenous, proximal, deep-water turbiditic Rossfeld Formation of the Staufen- Höllengebirgs Nappe represents a synorogenic development (see also VAŠÍCEKˇ and FAUPL 1998; LUKENEDER 2004). The locality is situated in the southernmost part of the Tirolic Unit which underlays and/or neighbours in this region a small ‘Hallstädter Scholle’. The Tirolic Unit is a part the ‘Traunalpen Scholle’ which at this region displays the westernmost part of the Staufen-Höllengebirgs Nappe. Lower Cretaceous sediments are represented at the area around the Kolowrat- shöhe section by two formations, the Rossfeld Formation (approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints on the Timescale of Animal Evolutionary History
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history Michael J. Benton, Philip C.J. Donoghue, Robert J. Asher, Matt Friedman, Thomas J. Near, and Jakob Vinther ABSTRACT Dating the tree of life is a core endeavor in evolutionary biology. Rates of evolution are fundamental to nearly every evolutionary model and process. Rates need dates. There is much debate on the most appropriate and reasonable ways in which to date the tree of life, and recent work has highlighted some confusions and complexities that can be avoided. Whether phylogenetic trees are dated after they have been estab- lished, or as part of the process of tree finding, practitioners need to know which cali- brations to use. We emphasize the importance of identifying crown (not stem) fossils, levels of confidence in their attribution to the crown, current chronostratigraphic preci- sion, the primacy of the host geological formation and asymmetric confidence intervals. Here we present calibrations for 88 key nodes across the phylogeny of animals, rang- ing from the root of Metazoa to the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens. Close attention to detail is constantly required: for example, the classic bird-mammal date (base of crown Amniota) has often been given as 310-315 Ma; the 2014 international time scale indicates a minimum age of 318 Ma. Michael J. Benton. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Philip C.J. Donoghue. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • ACTIVITY 7 – MARKING GUIDELINE: 1. a – Cuesta B – Homoclinal Ridge C
    ACTIVITY 7 – MARKING GUIDELINE: 1. A – Cuesta B – Homoclinal ridge C – Hogsback 2. Sedimentary 3. Inclined rocks with different resistance to erosion. Soft rock erodes away more quickly than hard rock. 4. The dip slope is 10–25° to the horizontal. Folding can result in cuesta basins and cuesta domes. 5. Farming can take place on dip slopes. Roads and railways can be built parallel to these landscapes. Gaps or poorts between homoclinal ridges can be good sites to build dams. Cuesta basins yield artesian water. Cuesta domes may contain oil and natural gas (fracking). Fertile valleys and plains between cuestas are suitable for human settlements. These ridges are used for forestry, tourism, recreation and nature conservation. These ridges can be used for defence purposes. (Accept any relevant answer) ACTIVITY 8 – MARKING GUIDELINE: 1. It occurs when strata are subjected to stress (compression, tension, volcanic intrusion, or tectonic movement) and they become tilted relative to their original (horizontal) position. Faulting or folding causes the strata to be tilted. The beds may be inclined in any direction with the angle of the dip slope between 0º to 90º. 2. Cuesta dome 3. The scarp slope faces inward, and dip slopes faces outward. 4. HOMOCLINICAL RIDGE: HOGSBACK: 5. HOMOCLINICAL RIDGE: HOGSBACK: • The angle of the dip slope lies 25º – 45º; • The angle of the dip slope is more than 45º; • Rivers cut poorts through the ridges; • There is very little difference in the gradient of the scarp and dip slopes ACTIVITY 9 – MARKING GUIDELINE: 1. A ridge that develop in tilted sedimentary rock characterised by a gentle slope and a steep slope 2.
    [Show full text]