Conflict Or Cooperation? by Peter Thompson, Chairman
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
VISIONS No 133, March 2016 Contents 1 Chairman’s commentary 2 Commentary (continued) 3 Development planning 4 Transport 5 Planning matters / AGM 6-7 Programme 8 Blue Plaques in 2015 / Contacts Frideswide Square just before completion in December. Time will tell whether its principles of ‘shared space’ will benefit all road users. See page 4 Photo courtesy of Oxfordshire County Council Conflict or cooperation? By Peter Thompson, Chairman Please join us ... One piece of good news in terms of cooperation is that the four authorities AGM and talk What lies ahead for us in 2016? Do adjacent to Oxford have agreed that, we face the prospect of mounting collectively, they will accommodate Wednesday 9 March 2016 conflict? Or can local authorities 15,000 of the new homes required by All welcome – see page 5 work creatively together to plan for the city, in addition to those they need a sustainable future for our region? for themselves. for the agenda and the enclosed review of 2015. The speaker will be Some see our county as a rural para- But the housing needs assessment on Alistair Fitt, the new Vice Chan- dise under threat from a conspiracy of which authorities are planning is widely cellor of Oxford Brookes University. complicit regulators and rapacious disputed and the clamour to scale back business interests. Others see it as a development is mounting. Fears are Note new venue! ‘golden goose’ which needs only to be rising that planning controls and Green Spring Clean 2016 fed with affordable housing and decent Belt designation (where it exists) will communications to lay golden eggs for not protect the county’s towns, villages 4, 5 and 6 March – see our our economy. Still others lament the and beautiful landscapes from the website www.oxclean.org.uk problems in recruiting staff for public destructive attentions of developers. There’s still time to register to take services because of the scarcity and West Oxfordshire District Council, after part in this great community event. cost of housing, while everyone seems initially accepting the projected housing to decry the traffic congestion. figures, subsequently prepared its draft opportunity to explain the situation by all for decades. The University is Local Plan on the basis of much less and to ensure a wider and better considering its holdings at Osney housing development than the assess- understanding of the issues. Mead; the County Council is exploring ment suggested. But the Government- improvements to Botley Road itself, However opinions on the need for appointed inspector not only refuted the and new development proposals for growth might vary, there is no doubt Council’s rejection of the housing Botley, hopefully more acceptable than that the status quo is not an option. needs assessment (which it had earlier those refused consent in 2015, will be The housing crisis is real, growing and ‘signed off’), he also confirmed that in forthcoming. affects us all. In Paris in December order to align with Government policy, the most ambitious projections for local 2015 the world finally agreed to aim to All this opens up prospects for the limit global warming to 1.5oC. The way economic growth should be adopted. regeneration of a large area of central we live and how we travel is going to Projected economic growth is one of Oxford, extending westwards, with the change. Our housing is energy- the key drivers of the housing needs station at its heart. We have been lob- wasteful; our transport infrastructure is assessment, along with the require- bying for the development of an effec- decrepit, overloaded, obsolete and ment for affordable homes. It was a tive transport interchange for several major blow for ‘growth deniers’. inadequate. Something must be done years and for re-location of the station – something is being done, but it has to to relieve the constraints. Who needs a golden goose? be paid for. Thus, whatever the local concerns, it seems unlikely that The key to the provision of a station ‘Growth’ is habitually cited as the big- government will allow Oxfordshire’s and a transport interchange worthy of gest villain of this piece. Oxfordshire is particular growth potential to remain Oxford is the commercial opportunity it economically buoyant, has few areas of unexploited. represents. It remains to be seen what deprivation and low levels of unemploy- emerges as the preferred solution for ment; who needs its economy to grow? For several years we have been calling the new station and whether this can for properly-integrated development elicit the funding necessary to deliver it. The answer is: the entire nation. and transport planning, coordinated Despite years of austerity, the economy across the region. We still don’t have it, The emergence of opportunities in the is still in a dire state – £1.6 trillion debt, but the idea is gaining momentum. The western area of the city prompted us to publicly-owned assets largely disposed uncoordinated and piecemeal ap- work with the Academy of Urbanism to of and a persistent deficit which cuts proaches of the past will not serve for organise a workshop to open up com- have failed to redress. the future. We must determine to munications and encourage coordina- tion of objectives, through some ‘real In 2012 Lord Heseltine produced his better accommodate the high- planning’. This event, taking place in No stone Unturned in Pursuit of Growth productivity, high-value deliverers st mid-March, has generated much inter- report, which set out the imperative for of the 21 century economy which est from all the invited parties, which is growth after the biggest global financial the country needs while preserving highly gratifying. We hope that the disaster since the 1930s. The Oxford all that is truly special about our city event might represent the dawn of a region, with its knowledge-based scien- and county. new era of ‘consultation’ in planning tific and engineering potential not only We consider that openness, engage- the way the city develops. offers the opportunity to contribute sub- ment and the development of better stantially to a national recovery, but to understanding is the best way forward. Clearly, the view forward suggests that diversify the basis of the nation’s econ- Bitter trench-warfare and a slow retreat 2016 is not going to be a year short of omy away from its dangerous depend- into disconnected semi-urban sprawl new visions for Oxford and its region, ence on the financial sector. across the county will not leave a with all the interest and inevitable con- troversy these are bound to engender. The economic projections for Oxford- legacy of which we might be proud. shire are based on the Strategic Eco- Peter Thompson All change in the city ... nomic Plan (SEP) for the county, pre- Chairman pared by the Local Enterprise Partner- Meanwhile Oxford is changing fast, ship (see Ian Green's article on page 3 especially in the area to the west of the for clarification of the organisations in- city centre. The new Westgate devel- PS Do join us at our volved). Its purpose is to provide evi- opment has been progressing up- AGM on 9 March to dence to the planning authorities, which wards, not downwards, for several hear Alistair Fitt, the they are required to take account of in weeks. Resolution of land ownership Vice Chancellor of setting policies, but it is currently being issues at Oxpens and on Park End Oxford Brookes Uni- ‘refreshed’, having been first published Street will lead the way to major devel- versity, talk about ‘the in 2014. Its revision, less than two opment opportunities in the heart of the innovation eco- years after preparation, indicates the city. Re-engineering has transformed system’ in our region. pressure and the pace with which eco- Frideswide Square and ideas are mov- We’d also welcome nomic growth is now being promoted. ing forward on the new railway station your support on (see page 4). These offer the prospect We have been urging that the public constitutional change of eliminating the ‘black hole’ of the consultation process for this revi- as outlined in Novem- Botley Road bridge, an aspiration held sion should be used as an ber’s newsletter. 2 oxcivicsoc.org.uk Development planning – unravelling the complexity Development planning in our city and a process which was not region is nothing if not complex. Ian subject to wider community Green, a member of our Executive consultation and which was separate from the prepara- Committee and urban planner, shines tion of Local Plans. The LEP a light on who does what and the is powerful as it links strate- challenge of working jointly. gic economic planning to central government and EU The Society’s Oxford Futures report, funding for strategic invest- published a year ago, noted that Oxford ments and liaises directly and its wider region are failing to realise with central government. potential opportunities for sustainable growth primarily provided by their We see the announcement science-based industries. Although the of a January–June 2016 city region has the potential to be a key ‘refresh’ of the SEP as an driver of the regional and national econ- opportunity to develop a omy this century, it was concluded that shared vision by expanding the city and region are being held back the economic growth by the lack of a shared vision of what debate to include, for the truly sustainable growth can offer to first time, the wider Oxford- everyone across the region. shire community. One of the constraints to the expansion … and the Oxfordshire of the debate is the complexity of the Growth Board current responsibilities for development The Oxfordshire Growth planning in Oxfordshire.