DOCSLIB.ORG

Terminal Synchronism of Daniel's Two Principal Periods: Two Thousand

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Terminal Synchronism of Daniel's Two Principal Periods: Two Thousand TERMINAL SYNCHRONISM OF DANIEL'S TWO PRINCIP .A.L PERIODS: . TWO THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED DAYS. AND A TIME, TIMES, AND THE DIVIDING OF TIME. BY THE AUTHOR OF DANIEL'S GREAT PERIOD OF TWO THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED DAYS DISCOVERED. WITH DISCUSSI ONS ON THE TWO DIFFERENT CO MMEN CEMENTS AS SIGNED BY DR. JQ:ITH AND REV. G. S. FABER TO THE PERIOD, A Time, Times, and Dividing of Time. LONDON: THOMAS JEPPS, PATERNOSTER ROW. ED�BURGH: OGLE & MURRAY, DUBLIN: W. CURRY & CO, 1858. THE PILLAR OF PHOCAS. S..P... 111. AD VER TISEME NT . IN the year 1854, when the discovery of Daniel's ' Great Period of 2300 years' was submitted to the public, the author had no expectation, that it would lead to the further discovery of the important Synchro­ nism communicated in the following pages. He had indeed long believed, that the Decree of the Emperor Phocas,addressed to Pope Boniface III. marked the commencement of Daniel's Great Normal Period, ' A Time and Times and Dividing of Time,' or the 1260 years of most Expositors. But he had incau­ tiously adopted the popular notion, which assigns the Pontificate of Boniface III. and therefore the above Decree to A.D. 606. And this would give A.D. 1866, as the termination of the above 1260 years. When, therefore, his own investigations led to A.D. 1867, as the termination of ' Daniel's Great Period of 2300 years'; he was reluctantly compelled to conclude, that these two important Periods did not admit of Synchronal terminations. But about two years afterwards, and while investi­ gating another Prophetical Era, he found, that some lV ADVERTISEMENT. Chronologists placed the Pontificate of Boniface III. (al}d therefore the above Decree) in A.D. 607. And this date would make the above Periods terminate in the same year. Before, however, allowing himself to adopt this result, it was necessary to examine as accurately as possible which of the above dates was the correct one. After having satisfied himself on this· point, the author became sensible of the importance of refuting some other theories concerning the commencement of the 1260 years, which had obtained more or less repute. And thus he has been compelled to increase the bulk and delay the appearance of this essay beyond what he had at first anticipated. The importance of the Synchronism now proposed, can scarcely be over-rated. The Student will perceive, that, if true, it would at once terminate some important controversies concerning the chronological relationship of Daniel's Periods, and probably contribute to settle others. And the. corrected understanding of that rela­ tionship would furnish a key to unlock many similar difficulties of the Apocalypse, and thus to harmonize the Chronology of the Old and New Testament pre­ dictions. CONTENTS.-- Page CHA.PT.Ell !.-Historical Commencement of the 1260 years, indicated by the Decree of Phocas, nominating Boniface ID. Universal Bishop. 1 Objections discussed. 7 Recapitulation. 22 APPENDIX-EcclesiasticalTestimonies, &c. 26 CHAP. 11.-Date of Phocas's Decree discussed. 32 SUPPLEMENT-How did the erroneous date of this Decree originate P 41 CHAP. III.-Synchronal Terminations of Daniel's Two Principal Periods. 45 How shall the Pope's pretended Spiritual Supremacy be overthrown P 48 CHAP. IV.-Dr. Keith's Theory as to the commencement of the 1260 years. Justinian's Letter to Pope John II. 59 CHAP. V.-Dr. Keith's Theory, &c. Justinian's Code and his Ninth Novella. 83 CHAP. VI.-Dr. Keith's Theory, &c. Justinian's Novella CXXXI. 89 CHAP. VII.-Dr. Keith's Theory refuted by the present position of the Papacy. 109 CHAP. VIII.-Faber's Epoch for the commencement of the 1260 years considered. 123 Supplementary Note on the Pillar of Phocas. 131 ERRATA. Page 4, Text, line 11, for expounded, read expander!. " 8, Do. 21, for dignitary, read dignity. " 16, Do. 2, for Saccrdotum, read Sacer<lotem. " 37, Note, line 19, for Belazione, read Relazione. " 46, Do. 4, for term, read turn " 50, Text, line 16, for Probates, 1·ead Prelates. " 51, Note, line 17, for Ecclesim, read Ecclesia. ,, " ,, " 20, for hac, read hmc. ,, 55, Do. 10, for those, read these. ,, 91, Note, line 11, for .,.,ov read .,."'"· " 91, Do. 20, for ,rpoE1p71µ,v,ov, read 1tpoE1p71µ.•v"'". ,, llO, Text, line 23, for will, read should. " 120, Do. I, for the read their. TERM IN AL SYNCHRONISM, ETC. CHAPTER I. COMMENCEMENT OF THE PERIOD, ' A TIME, AND TIMES, AND THE DIVIDING OF TIME.' DAN. vii. 25.-'And he shall speak great words against the Most High, and 'shall wear out the saints of the Most High, and think to change times 'and laws : and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times 'and the dividing of time.' AGREEING with those eminent expositors of Prophecy who have adopted, and; as I think, sufficiently esta-. blished the year day system, I regard the above Pro­ phetic period as including 1260 natural or Solar years. I also agree with them, that the above words supply the datum for determining, so far at least as this Vi. sion of Daniel is concerned, the prophetical commence­ ment of this great period. For in the above predic­ tion this period is characterized as one, during which, the ' Saints of the Most High' and the Times and Laws were to be given into the hand of the Little Horn. To determine then the commencement of this period we must ascertain when this surrender of the Saints, Times, and Laws into the hand of the Little Horn took place : or, in other words, when that authority 2 COMMENCEMENT OF THE PERIOD. or power was conferred on the Little Horn, which enabled him thus to assume the right to change Times and Laws, and to wear out the Saints of the Most High. Further 1 agree with those of the above commenta­ tors, who consider, that the Little Horn symbolizes more especially the Spiritual domination of the Pope : and that his superadded temporal dominion (estab­ lished on the ruins of three out of the ten Gothic kingdoms) is only incidentally introduced into the Pre­ diction, in order to furnish an additional and most important test of his identity-a test at once Geo­ graphical, Historical, and Chronological-and which I shall have occasion to make use of hereafter. In support of the above position, viz; that the Little Horn symbolizes primarily and principally the Spiritual Domination of the Papacy, I shall here quote the words and arguments of the venerable Faber: 'Yet while I agree with them,' (Sir Isaac Newton, Mr. Mede, and Bishop Newton) 'in the general, that � a persecuting power, which is marked out chronologi­ , cally as springing up almost unperceived in the course · ' of the fifth and sixth centuries, and which is deter­ ' mined geographically as rising within the limits of 'the Western Roman Empire, can only be the Pa­ ' pacy: I am unable entirely to assent to their precise 'mode of exposition. They suppose, that the Little ·, Horn symbolizes the temporal kingdom of the Papacy: ' 1, on the contrary, believe it to represent exclusively 'the Spiritual Domination of the Roman See.' 'In the :figurative language of Scripture, the same ' hieroglyphic, as I have already shown very abun­ , dantly, represents both temporal and spiritual things ; ' provided only those things are mutually connected by ' A TIME, AND TIMES, AND THE DIVIDING OF TIME.' 3 ' a common leading idea. Thus a star typifies either a ' Prince or a Priest, the one being in the state what the ' other is in the Church: and thus, by a parity of rea. ' soning, the present symbol, a horn, may abstractedly ' signify either a temporal Kingdom, or an ecclesiastical 'kingdom. ' Of these two significations, Sir Isaac Newton and 'Mr. Mede and Bishop Newton adopt the former. 'Hence, as I have just stated, they suppose 'the Little ' Horn of the Roman Beast to mean the Temporal ' Kingdom of the Papacy, or that small Italian Prin­ ' cipality, which bears the general name of the Eccle­ ' siastical Estates, or St. Peter's Patrimony: a supposi­ ' tion, which of necessity leads them further to main­ ' tain, that the Papacy was not a horn until it acquired 'this principality, and that it became a horn by the ' subversion of the three horns, which were destined to 'fall before it. To such a scheme, there are, if I mis­ ' take not, insuperable objections. It will not accord ' with the prophecy itself: and therefore, as we might ' naturally expect, it will not accord with the events.' 'In the first place, certain definite actions are as­ ' cribed to the Little Horn. But these actions were ' performed by the Pope wholly as an Ecclesiastical 'Power claiming universal dominion over the Church, 'not as the Petty Sovereign of an Italian Principality 'possessing no weight in the general balance of Europe. ' Therefore the Little Horn, to which such actions are 'ascribed, cannot be the insignificant Temporal King­ ' dom of the Pope.' ' In the second place, the Little Horn is represented ' by the prophet, as being already in existence previous ' to the eradication · of the three horns. But the ' scheme at present under consideration supposes, that .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction to Leo the Great and the Late Roman World That Was His Stage
    INTRODUCTION TO LEO THE GREAT AND THE LATE ROMAN WORLD THAT WAS HIS STAGE 1. The study of Leo the Great What was it about Leo that made him ‘the Great’?1 A distinguished public career as the bishop of Rome (pope, 440–461), a respectable rhetorical education, and a literary production consisting of eloquent sermons and letters placed him among the Roman intelligentsia.His intellectual achievement, however, was not of the same order as the greatest Christian minds of the western empire. He did not match the breadth, subtlety, and complexity of thought that was characteristic of Ambrose (d. 397), Jerome (d. 420), or Augustine (d. 430). Nor was he responsible for developing the tradition of spirituality that distinguished the work of the monastic leader John Cassian (d. 435) and his colleagues in southern Gaul. His ideas were dependent upon and embedded in those of his predecessors and contemporaries, making it difficult to dis- tinguish his original contribution from the intellectual and social fabric of the times that influenced him. Given these shortcomings, I might be forgiven for considering the possibility that Leo’s accomplishments did not merit the title ‘the Great’. Yet even such a dogged critic of the rise of Christianity as Edward Gibbon (d. 1794) recognized that “[t]he genius of Leo was exercised and displayed in the public misfortunes”, and that he “deserved the appellation of Great by the successful zeal with which he labored to establish his opinions and his authority, under the venerable names of orthodox faith and ecclesiastical discipline.”2 Leo’s greatness resided for Gibbon mainly in his worldly successes.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctrine of Purgatory 1208 1244 Aquinas & Indulgences Patriarchate
    Doctrine of Patriarchate Constantinople Palestine lostPope Clement Bubonic Emperor’s Reformer Council of Spanish purgatory of Kiev retaken 1291 V plague submission John Hus 3 popes! Florence Inquisition 1208 1248 1261 1305 1347 1355 1412 1409 1439 1479 1244 ~1250 1274 1302 1335 1330-1368 1378 1418 1453 Aquinas & Scholasticism Council of Pope Boniface Hundred Barlaam & Popes, antipopes & Council of Fall of indulgences Lyons III Years’ War Palamas schism Constance Constantinople SESSION 23: CRUSADES TO THE FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE – CONTENT 1. Pope Urban’s vision of a unified Church quickly turned into an effort to Latinize the East through the Crusades. Although Pope Innocent III had instructed crusaders to not go to Constantinople (4th, 1204), they took mules into the sanctuary of Hagia Sophia to carry away plunder. And Innocent then said that the crusade was a “just judgement of God”. He began the rebaptizing and reordination of Eastern clergy who converted, and inconsiderately installed a Venetian nobleman as the Latin Patriarch of Constantinople. Later, the West began blaming the East for the crusades’ failures. The following years were devastation in both East and West. The East was under constant Turkish attack as the Byzantine Empire diminished. In the West nationalism gave rise to independent countries and kings, who sought to control Rome. Two events brought great devastation to all of Europe – the Hundred Years’ War between England and France, and the Bubonic Plague. The historian S.E. Ozmont said, “As never before, not even during the century of the Roman Empire’s collapse, Western people walked through the valley of the shadow of death”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of “Sister Churches” in Catholic-Orthodox Relations Since
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA The Concept of “Sister Churches” In Catholic-Orthodox Relations since Vatican II A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Theology and Religious Studies Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy © Copyright All Rights Reserved By Will T. Cohen Washington, D.C. 2010 The Concept of “Sister Churches” In Catholic-Orthodox Relations since Vatican II Will T. Cohen, Ph.D. Director: Paul McPartlan, D.Phil. Closely associated with Catholic-Orthodox rapprochement in the latter half of the 20 th century was the emergence of the expression “sister churches” used in various ways across the confessional division. Patriarch Athenagoras first employed it in this context in a letter in 1962 to Cardinal Bea of the Vatican Secretariat for the Promotion of Christian Unity, and soon it had become standard currency in the bilateral dialogue. Yet today the expression is rarely invoked by Catholic or Orthodox officials in their ecclesial communications. As the Polish Catholic theologian Waclaw Hryniewicz was led to say in 2002, “This term…has now fallen into disgrace.” This dissertation traces the rise and fall of the expression “sister churches” in modern Catholic-Orthodox relations and argues for its rehabilitation as a means by which both Catholic West and Orthodox East may avoid certain ecclesiological imbalances toward which each respectively tends in its separation from the other. Catholics who oppose saying that the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church are sisters, or that the church of Rome is one among several patriarchal sister churches, generally fear that if either of those things were true, the unicity of the Church would be compromised and the Roman primacy rendered ineffective.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Anglican Christianity
    TIMELINE OF ANGLICAN CHRISTIANITY INSULAR CELTIC CHRISTIANITY c. 30 – The Death and Resurrection of Jesus c. 37 – Christianity brought to Britain (according to St. Gildas, d. 570) c. 62 – The Deaths of Peter and Paul 200s - Christianity has been established in parts of the British Isles with a distinctive regional tradition: • Focus on monasticism (some evidence of monastic communities made up of married couples) • Possibly less clergy-centric (When Augustine comes and pushes for changes, the Celtic bishops wouldn’t agree without conferring with their people) • Distinct monastic tonsure • Different penitential routine (entirely private vs. public) • Different date of Easter • Baptismal Rite considered “incomplete” by Rome (perhaps no Confirmation takes place or perhaps only a single immersion during the baptismal words) • Unique tradition of “living in exile” for Christ 254-257 – Stephen I first claims place of primary for Bishop of Rome 304 – Martyrdom of first British Christians (Alban, Aaron & Julius) 313 – Christianity legally permitted in the Roman Empire by Emperor Constantine I 314 - Council of Arles convenes to condemn the heresy of Donatism (3 British bishops are among the representation – the British bishops are accused by some of Pelagianism) 325 – The ecumenical Council of Nicea meets to discuss the nature of God and Jesus; the first Nicene Creed is produced as a summary of faith. 380 – Christianity becomes the official religion of the Empire 381 – The ecumenical Council of Constantinople meets to discuss the Trinity; the Nicene Creed is expanded to explain more about the Holy Spirit. 393,397 – The local synods of Hippo and Carthage, respectively, ratify the listing of authoritative Christian Scriptures, determining what will become known as the New Testament.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Catholic Religion Viewed in the Light of Prophecy and History
    THE i . • * ."- ROMAN CATHOLIC RELIGION VIEWED IN THE LIGHT OF PROPHECY AND HISTORY: ITS FINAL DOWNFALL: AND THB TRIUMPH OF THE CHURCH OF CHRIST. ECCLESIA CHRISTI SEMPER ET UBIttUE EADEH ! BY W^CrlRbwNtEE, D. D., Of the Collegiate Protestant Reformed Dutch Church. Author of Letters in the Roman Catholic Controversy — Popery an Enemy to Civil and Re ligious Liberty — The Christian Father at Home — The Christian Youth'* Book— The Deity of Christ— Ancient Religion of the Irish, &c. NEW YORK. CHARLES K. MOORE, 142 NASSAU STREET. 1843, r-2-33 PREFACE. This Oration was delivered as the author's annual Discourse, in his own church, in Lafay ette Place, and in the North church, — on Ro manism. It was also delivered in the Rutgers street church, under the pastoral care of the Rev. Dr. Krebbs. The history of its publication is simply this. A young gentleman, a particular friend of the author, offered a. handsome sum for a copy of it in MS. — Our Agent was asked if he would make a copy of it on the condition offered. " Tell the gentleman," said he, " that his liber ality will induce me to put your Oration into type, and therefore enable me to present your friend with a neatly printed copy, and in extra binding." So, gentle reader, here it is presented to you from the press of Mr. C. K. Moore, by the liberality of my young friend, TO WHOM it is most respectfully dedicated. W. C. Brownlbe. New York : ) March, 1843. \ THE ARGUMENT; OK PLAN AND OUTLINE OF THE ORATION.
    [Show full text]
  • Justinian's Metamorphosis from Chief of Staffs to Th
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 7, No. 1; January 2017 538 A.D. and the Transition from Pagan Roman Empire to Holy Roman Empire: Justinian’s Metamorphosis from Chief of Staffs to Theologian*1 Keum Young Ahn; Gerard Damsteegt; Edwin de Kock; Sook Young Kim; Jhung Haeng Kwon; Myun Ju Lee; Nicolas Miller; Dae Geuk Nam; Trevor O’ Reggio; William H. Shea; Alberto R. Treiyer; Koot van Wyk Emeritii, or Retired, or Active Professors and Researchers Abstract The year 538 A.D. became the turning point in the history of the Roman Empire since so many aspects on political, administrative and economical levels were already switched off that when Justinian declared himself to be a theologian from this year and no longer a soldier, he crossed the barrier of his mandate between what is purely civil obligation and what is religious obligation, similarly to Constantine before, and entered in competition with the papal function and this role is evidence of Justinian’s ongoing caesaro-papism. The quest for unification of the empire by unification of the church, the fever for church-building projects with his wife Theodora, the persecution of enemies of the church and heretics, his disdain with the Sabbath although his second name was Sabbatini, his support for suppressing any eschatological fever in line with the church fathers and Oecumenius and yet trying to build the ‘Kingdom of God’ on earth, all this indicate the problem 538 was for the Roman Empire and the Catholic Church. Archaeological and historical original sources of Justinian and contemporaries of popes, biographer of Justinian and a commentator on Revelation (Oecumenius) are very revealing of these times and the shift or transition of what belonged to the Roman Empire handed over since 538 A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Papacy: an Overview of Its History and Nature
    The Papacy: An Overview of Its History and Nature The Papal Church is a magnificently rich, splendidly housed political and ecclesiastical power headquartered in Rome. It stands in stark contrast to what started there in the first century with some pastors ministering to small congregations. The differences are graphic. The early home churches under their pastors looked to the authority of the Word as received in the gospel accounts of the life of the Lord and the writings of the Apostles, together with the Old Testa- ment. These pastors and churches had a true and living faith in God’s grace through the Gospel. From the letter of Paul to the Romans one sees that the Gospel was faithfully treasured in those early Roman congregations. At the beginning of his letter, the Apostle commends the believers at Rome for their faith, “First, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for you all, that your faith is spoken of throughout the whole world. For God is my witness, whom I serve with my spirit in the gospel of his Son.…”1 Such approvals are infrequent with the Apostle Paul. The faith of the churches of Rome continued to be well known and faithfully lived for two hundred fifty years more under very adverse situations, including extreme persecutions, the most famous of which took place under Emperor Nero in the 64 A.D. Totally unimaginable for these early believers in Rome would be the present concept of “the most holy Roman Pontiff.” Unthinkable likewise would be the belief that rituals could confer the grace of the Holy Spirit and that Mary, the mother of the Lord, could be addressed in prayer as “the All Holy One”.2 In the fellowship of believers, a top heavy hierarchical system, from layperson to priest, from to priest to bishop, from bishop to cardinal and cardinal to Pope would have been totally abhorrent, as from the world and not from Christ who said, “One is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.”3 The spread of the Christian faith during the first three centuries was extensive and rapid.
    [Show full text]
  • Pope V. State : the Medieval Catholic Church As an International
    Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from Lyrasis Members and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/popevstatemedievOOeage Pope V. State: The Medieval Catholic Church as an International Governmental Organization A Senior Honors Thesis in the Department of History Sweet Briar College Elizabeth K.C. Eager Defended and Approved April 20, 2005 Dr. Laufenbergg -Thesis Project Faculty Advisor - May 6, 2005 N L^^fe^— Dr. Brister -May 6, 2005 f^^l£^ (W^ ^ r. Stegmaier - May 6, 2005 Contents Introduction 1 Case I: Holy Roman Emperor Henry IV and Pope Gregory VII 19 Case II: King John of England and Pope Innocent III 35 Case III: King Philip the Fair of France and Pope Boniface III 51 Conclusion 70 Appendix A: Documents from Case 1 76 Appendix B: Documents from Case II 85 Appendix C: Documents from Case III 95 Bibliography 103 Introduction The conflicts between the medieval Catholic Church, more specifically, medieval popes, and the European monarchs of the Middle Ages resulted in sovereignty disputes between church and state. The object of this thesis is to understand the nature of these power struggles and to demonstrate that the medieval Church functioned in many ways like a prototype IGO. In order to do this, an analogy will be drawn between the medieval Church and modern international governmental organizations, specifically the United Nations. The nature of the power of these two entities, and the struggles in application of their power, are similar in many ways. The goal of this project is to make church-state conflict, as well as the major figures in these episodes, more accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role and Status of the Catholic Church in the Church-State Relationship Within the Roman Empire from A.D
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2009 The Role and Status of the Catholic Church in the Church-State Relationship Within the Roman Empire from A.D. 306 to 814 Jean Carlos Zukowski Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Catholic Studies Commons, and the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Zukowski, Jean Carlos, "The Role and Status of the Catholic Church in the Church-State Relationship Within the Roman Empire from A.D. 306 to 814" (2009). Dissertations. 174. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/174 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary THE ROLE AND STATUS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN THE CHURCH-STATE RELATIONSHIP WITHIN THE ROMAN EMPIRE FROM A.D. 306 TO 814 A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Jean Carlos Zukowski July 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................. viii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION ................................ 1 Background of the Problem ........................ 1 Statement of the Problem .......................... 4 Purpose .................................... 6 Justification for the Research .......................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecclesiastical Networks and the Papacy at the End of Late Antiquity, C
    Ecclesiastical Networks and the Papacy at the End of Late Antiquity, c. 550–700 A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2018 Sihong Lin School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Table of Contents List of Abbreviations 4 Abstract 5 Declaration and Copyright Statement 6 Acknowledgements 7 Introduction 8 Historiography 12 The Sources and Their Context 20 Methodology and Structure 26 1. The World of Gregory the Great 32 1.1 Imperial Patriarchs 35 1.2 The ‘Conversion’ of Khosrow II 50 1.3 The Gregorian Mission in Context 57 2. The Papacy and the ‘World Crisis’ 64 2.1 Phocas and Heraclius 66 2.2 The Moschan Circle in Egypt 74 2.3 Honorius’ Rome 80 2.4 Age of Division 85 3. Aftershocks of 649 93 3.1 Visigothic Spain 96 3.2 Merovingian Gaul 106 3.3 Imperial Triumph 124 4. Maximus, Wilfrid, and the End of Late Antiquity 134 4.1 Saints on Trial 136 4.2 Wilfrid in Rome 144 4.3 The Franks and Whitby 157 4.4 The Tide Turns 166 Epilogue: The Sixth Ecumenical Council 174 2 Conclusions 178 Bibliography 184 Word count: 77,917 3 List of Abbreviations AASS Acta sanctorum ACO Acta conciliorum oecumenicorum CCSG Corpus Christianorum, Series Graeca CCSL Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina CSCO Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium MGH Monumenta Germaniae Historica AA Auctores antiquissimi SRG Scriptores rerum Germanicarum SRL Scriptores rerum Langobardicarum et Italicarum SRM Scriptores rerum Merovingicarum ODB A. Kazhdan (ed.), Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, 3 vols.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Religions by John Hayward
    The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Book of Religions by John Hayward This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license Title: The Book of Religions Author: John Hayward Release Date: October 24, 2009 [Ebook 30323] Language: English ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE BOOK OF RELIGIONS*** The Book of Religions Comprising The Views, Creeds, Sentiments, or Opinions, Of All The Principal Religious Sects In The World Particularly Of All Christian Denominations In Europe and America To Which Are Added Church and Missionary Statistics Together With Biographical Sketches By John Hayward Author of “New England Gazetteer” Boston: Albert Colby And Company. 20 Washington Street. 1860 Contents Preface. .2 Index. .5 Lutherans, Or, The Evangelical Lutheran Church. 19 Calvinists. 20 Hopkinsians. 22 Arians. 28 Socinians. 29 Humanitarians. 30 Sectarians. 30 Church Government. 31 Presbyterians. 32 Cumberland Presbyterians. 36 Episcopalians. 37 Historical Notice Of The Church In The United States. 44 Articles Of Religion. 49 Cambridge And Saybrook Platforms. 60 Moravians, Or United Brethren. 61 Tunkers. 68 Mennonites, Or Harmless Christians. 70 Disciples Of Christ; Sometimes Called Campbellites, or Reformers. 71 Friends, or Quakers. 77 Shakers, Or The United Society Of Believers. 88 Reformation. 99 Reformed Churches. 102 Reformed Dutch Church. 102 Reformed German Church. 104 Restorationists. 105 Universalists. 110 iv The Book of Religions Roman Catholics. 117 Bereans. 123 Materialists.
    [Show full text]
  • The Papacy (This Book Being the Fruit of Those Labors)
    1 EDITOR’S PREFACE Réné-Francois Guettée was ordained a Roman Catholic priest at Blois, France in the year 1839. Almost immediately following his ordination he set out on a monumental task conceived in his mind a few years earlier. To research and then write a complete “History of the Church of France”. It was this innocent endeavor that would soon lead him to unexpected discoveries and inescapable conclusions concerning the papacy (This book being the fruit of those labors). With patience and care Guettée skillfully sweeps away the rubble of misconception and fraud that obscured the pristine voice of Church Fathers and their genuine apostolic witness. His impeccable proofs shattering the pretensions and anti-Catholic innovations of Rome whose foundation was evidently no longer Christ. Instead she is shown to have chosen a different cornerstone and a most fallible substitute. He reveals how this former apostolic see once renowned for her orthodoxy would, through worldly arrogance and pride insert her single unaccountable bishop as the principal overseer of the Church, thus negating the ancient apostolic model for governance. Its effect, a continuing denial and illegitimate replacement for the Churches One and True Head. In Chapter V Father Guettée presents a series of letters written by Pope Gregory the Great (6th C). These letters to the Patriarch of Constantinople , John the Faster are responses to what he construes as John’s attempts to be recognized as the Church’s Universal Bishop or Bishop of Bishops. A notion he thoroughly and absolutely condemns as inspired by the devil. (He being the first born of those who attempt by self exaltation to ascend a place not theirs.) Forcefully and with great clarity he vigorously denies such prerogative for any Apostolic See including the one he himself now presides over, Rome.
    [Show full text]