Resistance Management of the Western Corn Rootworm (Diabrotica Virgifera Virgifera)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Resistance Management of the Western Corn Rootworm (Diabrotica Virgifera Virgifera) Resistance management of the western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera): behavior, survival and the potential for cross resistance on Bt corn in the field, greenhouse and laboratory A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctorate of Plant, Insect & Microbial Science By SARAH N. ZUKOFF Bruce Hibbard, Dissertation Supervisor May 2013 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the Dissertation entitled RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT OF THE WESTERN CORN ROOTWORM (DIABROTICA VIRGIFERA VIRGIFERA): BEHAVIOR, SURVIVAL AND THE POTENTIAL FOR CROSS RESISTANCE ON BT CORN IN THE FIELD, GREENHOUSE AND LABORATORY Presented by Sarah N. Zukoff A candidate for the degree of Doctorate of Plant, Insect & Microbial Science And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. [Dr. Bruce E. Hibbard, Co-Advisor, Division of Plant Sciences] [Dr. Wayne C. Bailey, Co-Advisor, Division of Plant Sciences] [Dr. Deborah L. Finke, Division of Plant Sciences] [Dr. Richard M. Houseman, Division of Plant Sciences] [Dr. Mark R. Ellersieck, Department of Statistics] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisors Bruce Hibbard and Wayne Bailey for their guidance and support over the last four years. Their influence on my scientific abilities has been tremendous and has enabled me to go further than I ever thought possible. I would like to thank Deborah Finke for her helpful advice and her willingness to lend a listening ear. Also, I would like to thank her for her excellent teaching abilities and the effort that she puts into her classes and her students which has had a great influence on me. I would also like to thank Richard Houseman for his always helpful advice on my research and outreach endeavors. I would like to also thank Mark Ellersieck who always helped me with my statistical issues for all of my experiments, manuscripts and this dissertation despite his incredibly full schedule. My research would not have been possible if it weren’t for the tireless efforts of everyone in my lab, past and present. I would especially like to thank Daniel Frank and Ivan Hiltpold for taking the time out of their busy post doc research to help me with my experiments, and to Anthony Zukoff, Mathew Higdon, Julie Barry and Tim Praiswater for the many of things they have helped me with in the field and lab. My fellow graduate students and the entire Entomology faculty have been very supportive and I would like to thank all of them for this. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..............................................................................................................ii List of Figures ...................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ....................................................................................................................... ix Abstract ................................................................................................................................ x Chapter I: Introduction and Literature Review ................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Host Location ................................................................................................................. 3 Feeding behavior within root ......................................................................................... 8 Movement between plants .......................................................................................... 10 Insect Resistance Management ................................................................................... 11 Control and Resistance: an evolving problem ............................................................. 13 Chapter II: Western corn rootworm larval movement in SmartStax seed blend scenarios ........................................................................................................................................... 20 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 20 Methods ....................................................................................................................... 23 Larval Recovery ....................................................................................................... 27 Plant Damage .......................................................................................................... 28 Adult Recovery ......................................................................................................... 29 Statistical Analysis ................................................................................................... 30 Results .......................................................................................................................... 32 Larval recovery ........................................................................................................ 32 Plant Damage .......................................................................................................... 33 iii Adult Recovery ......................................................................................................... 35 Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 37 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................... 42 Chapter III: Western corn rootworm larval movement in duracade seed blend scenarios ........................................................................................................................................... 53 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 53 Methods ....................................................................................................................... 55 Larval Recovery ....................................................................................................... 58 Plant Damage .......................................................................................................... 59 Adult Recovery ......................................................................................................... 59 Statistical Analysis ................................................................................................... 60 Results .......................................................................................................................... 61 Adult Recovery ......................................................................................................... 61 Damage ................................................................................................................... 63 Larval Recovery ....................................................................................................... 64 Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 65 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................... 71 Chapter IV: Host Recognition Responses of Western Corn Rootworm Larvae to Bt corn. ........................................................................................................................................... 83 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 83 Methods ....................................................................................................................... 86 Insects ...................................................................................................................... 87 Plant Material .......................................................................................................... 87 Bioassays ................................................................................................................. 88 iv EthoVision Protocol ................................................................................................. 88 Statistical Analysis ................................................................................................... 90 Results .......................................................................................................................... 90 Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 90 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................... 92 Chapter V: Evaluation of potential cross resistance between field resistant and susceptible populations of the western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera) on mCry3A, Cry3Bb1 and Cry34/35Ab1 corn in laboratory and greenhouse assays ............ 95 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 95 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................ 98 Rootworm Populations ...........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Coccinella Algerica Kovář, 1977
    Boletín Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, n1 39 (2006) : 323 −327. COCCINELLA ALGERICA KOVÁŘ, 1977: A NEW SPECIES TO THE FAUNA OF MAINLAND EUROPE, AND A KEY TO THE COCCINELLA LINNAEUS, 1758 OF IBERIA, THE MAGHREB AND THE CANARY ISLANDS (COLEOPTERA, COCCINELLIDAE) Keith J. Bensusan1, Josep Muñoz Batet2 & Charles E. Perez1 1 The Gibraltar Ornithological & Natural History Society, PO Box 843, Gibraltar − [email protected] 2 Museu de Zoologia, Parc de la Ciutadella, 08003 Barcelona Abstract: The ladybird Coccinella algerica Kovář, 1977 is recorded from Gibraltar. This constitutes the first record of this spe- cies for Iberia and mainland Europe. Furthermore, the presence of the closely related Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus, 1758 in Gibraltar is also confirmed, providing the first record of sympatry between these two sibling species. Figures showing the genitalia of specimens from Gibraltar are included to support the record of the presence of both species on the Rock. Fi- nally, a key to the members of the genus Coccinella Linnaeus, 1758 present in Iberia, the Maghreb and the Canary Islands is included. Key words: Coleoptera, Coccinellidae, Coccinella algerica, Coccinella septempunctata, sympatry, key, Gibraltar, Iberia, Europe. Coccinella algerica Kovář, 1977: una nueva especie para la fauna europea continental, y clave para las Coc- cinella Linnaeus, 1758 de la Península Ibérica, el Maghreb y las Islas Canarias (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) Resumen: Se cita Coccinella algerica Kovář, 1977 de Gibraltar. Esta es la primera cita de la especie para la Península Ibéri- ca y Europa continental. También se confirma la presencia en Gibraltar de Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus, 1758, espe- cie muy similar a C.
    [Show full text]
  • E0020 Common Beneficial Arthropods Found in Field Crops
    Common Beneficial Arthropods Found in Field Crops There are hundreds of species of insects and spi- mon in fields that have not been sprayed for ders that attack arthropod pests found in cotton, pests. When scouting, be aware that assassin bugs corn, soybeans, and other field crops. This publi- can deliver a painful bite. cation presents a few common and representative examples. With few exceptions, these beneficial Description and Biology arthropods are native and common in the south- The most common species of assassin bugs ern United States. The cumulative value of insect found in row crops (e.g., Zelus species) are one- predators and parasitoids should not be underes- half to three-fourths of an inch long and have an timated, and this publication does not address elongate head that is often cocked slightly important diseases that also attack insect and upward. A long beak originates from the front of mite pests. Without biological control, many pest the head and curves under the body. Most range populations would routinely reach epidemic lev- in color from light brownish-green to dark els in field crops. Insecticide applications typical- brown. Periodically, the adult female lays cylin- ly reduce populations of beneficial insects, often drical brown eggs in clusters. Nymphs are wing- resulting in secondary pest outbreaks. For this less and smaller than adults but otherwise simi- reason, you should use insecticides only when lar in appearance. Assassin bugs can easily be pest populations cannot be controlled with natu- confused with damsel bugs, but damsel bugs are ral and biological control agents.
    [Show full text]
  • International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods 2005
    ___________________________________________________________________________ Bai et al. virtually continuous source of fruit throughout the year compared to the other wild olive stands which displayed more erratic olive production. This correlated to lower incidence of both groups of insects in these areas. Measurements of olive fruit sizes from each of the areas indicated that the wild olive fruit stands along the river produced larger wild olive fruit which probably more readily supported the successful development of both olive fruit flies and parasitoids. Ovipositor length of the collected parasitoid species were measured on speci- mens from each of the collection areas and these measurements were correlated with fruit sizes in order to determine differences in species composition based on fruit size. Session 7: Compatibility of Insect-Resistant Transgenic Plants with Biological Control STUDIES ON THE COMPONENTS AND DIVERSITY OF THE ARTHROPOD COMMUNITY IN TRANSGENIC BT COTTON (FOUR BOLLGARD VARIETIES) IN JIANGSU COASTAL REGION Li-xin BAI1, Long-wa ZHANG1, Liu-bin XIAO1, Han-Jin FENG2, and Zong-Qin ZOU2 1Plant Protection Institute, Jiangsu Academy of Agri. Sciences Nanjing 210014, China 27 2Farm of Cotton Seed Breeding of Dafeng Dafeng 224100, China In order to overall evaluate the ecological safety and planting risk of insect resistant transgenic Bt cotton, the composition and diversity of the arthropod community in 4 Bollgard varieties: ‘109B’, ‘154’, ‘690’, and ‘972’ was studies by means of the quantitative analysis method in Dafeng of Jiangsu coastal region. The results showed: no marked difference in arthropod species was found between each of Bollgard varieties and traditional variety check (Simian-3). The dominant species and their abundance were very close among them.
    [Show full text]
  • Method for Continuously Rearing Coccinella Lady Beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)
    42 The Open Entomology Journal, 2012, 6, 42-48 Open Access Method for Continuously Rearing Coccinella Lady Beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Louis S. Hesler*,1, Ginger McNickle2, Michael A. Catangui3, John E. Losey4, Eric A. Beckendorf1, Leonard Stellwag4, Danielle M. Brandt2, and Pamela B. Bartlett2 1 North Central Agricultural Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Brookings, SD 57006, USA 2 Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA 3 47153 S. Clubhouse Road, Sioux Falls, SD 57108, USA 4 Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Abstract: Coccinella novemnotata L., the ninespotted lady beetle, and Coccinella transversoguttata richardsoni Brown, the transverse lady beetle, are predatory species whose abundance has declined significantly over the last few decades in North America. An ex situ system for continuously rearing these two beetles is described here to aid conservation efforts and facilitate studies aimed at determining factors in their decline and possible recovery. All rearing of lady beetles was conducted in the laboratory at or near room temperatures and 16:8 L:D photoperiod. The two coccinellid species were each reared separately, and different life stages were handled independently. Eggs were collected every 1 to 2 d and placed in holding containers, and individual clutches were transferred to cages with prey when their eggs began to hatch. Neonate larvae were fed live bird cherry-oat aphids [Rhopalosiphum padi (L.)] for 3 to 4 d, and second instars were trans- ferred to different cages and fed live pea aphids [Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris)]. Third and fourth instars were also fed pea aphids, but reared individually in small cups to preclude cannibalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Overall Invertebrate Review
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Preliminary risk assessment for soil, soil surface and foliar invertebrates for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Bb protein, EPA Reg. No. 524-LEI; Barcode No. D262045; Case No. 066221; Submission No. S572997, submitted by Monsanto Co. for corn containing Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Bb protein and the genetic material necessary for its production (vector ZMIR13L) in corn for control of corn root worm (Diabrotica spp.) FROM: Zigfridas Vaituzis, Ph.D., Senior Scientist Phil Hutton, Chief Microbial Pesticides Branch Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, 7511C PEER REVIEW: Robyn Rose, Entomologist Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, 7511C TO: Michael Mendelsohn, Regulatory Action Leader Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division 7511C Pesticide Name: Modified Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Bb1 insecticidal protein and genetic material necessary for its expression in corn developed with event MON 863 (vector ZMIR13L). Registrant: Monsanto Company, 700 Chesterfield Parkway North, St. Louis, MO 63198 The Monsanto Company has requested a registration for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Bb1 protein and the genetic material (ZMIR13L) necessary for its production in all corn lines and varieties. The Cry3Bb1 protein is intended to control the corn rootworm (CRW, Diabrotica spp.), a coleopteran pest of corn. The CRW is a primary pest of corn in the U.S., it feeds on corn roots as larvae leading to a reduction in the plant’s ability to absorb water and nutrients from soil and lodging. In areas where the CRW is a pest (e.g., corn belt), significant financial losses are realized from a decrease in production and chemical insecticide usage.
    [Show full text]
  • COSEWIC Special Report
    COSEWIC Special Report on the List of Prioritized Coccinelidae and Related Groups at Risk in Canada 2012 Funding provided by Environment Canada This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2012. COSEWIC Special Report on the Changes in the Status and Geographic ranges on the Canadian Lady Beetles Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Coccinellinae and the selection of Candidate Species for Risk, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 60 pp. (http://www.cosewic.gc.ca) Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Dr. David B. McCorquodale, Dr. Donna J. Giberson and Meghan Marriott for writing the Special Report on Canadian Lady Beetles, Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Coccinellinae, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Dr. Paul Catling and Jennifer Heron, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Arthropods Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Évolution de la situation et de la répartition géographique des coccinelles canadiennes (Coleoptères : Coccinellidés : Coccinellinés) et sélection d’espèces candidates à une évaluation détaillée de situation au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Canadian Lady Beetles — Photo Credit: Acorn 2007. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2014. Recycled paper PREAMBLE This report was commissioned to document changes in geographic ranges of potentially vulnerable native lady beetles (Coccinella novemnotata, C. transversoguttata, Hippodamia hieroglyphica, H. parenthesis, H. tredecimpunctata, Adalia bipunctata and Anatis mali) ; the five most common and widespread non-native lady beetles (C.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Two Introduced Ladybeetles, Coccinella Septempunctata and Harmonia Axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), on Native Coccinellid Species at Mount St
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2007 Impacts of Two Introduced Ladybeetles, Coccinella septempunctata and Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), on Native Coccinellid Species at Mount St. Helens, Washington and in Southwestern Virginia Catherine Marie Sheehy University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Sheehy, Catherine Marie, "Impacts of Two Introduced Ladybeetles, Coccinella septempunctata and Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), on Native Coccinellid Species at Mount St. Helens, Washington and in Southwestern Virginia. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2007. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/230 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Catherine Marie Sheehy entitled "Impacts of Two Introduced Ladybeetles, Coccinella septempunctata and Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), on Native Coccinellid Species at Mount St. Helens, Washington and in Southwestern Virginia." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Dan Simberloff, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Paris Lambdin, Nathan Sanders, James Fordyce Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R.
    [Show full text]
  • Nine-Spotted Lady Beetle Coccinella Novemnotata
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Nine-spotted Lady Beetle Coccinella novemnotata in Canada ENDANGERED 2016 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2016. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Nine-spotted Lady Beetle Coccinella novemnotata in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. x + 57 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Paul Grant for writing the status report on the Nine-spotted Lady Beetle (Coccinella novemnotata) in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This status report and was overseen and edited by Jennifer Heron, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Arthropods Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la Coccinelle à neuf points (Coccinella novemnotata) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Nine-spotted Lady Beetle — Photo by John Acorn. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2016. Catalogue No. CW69-14/731-2016E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-05550-3 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – May 2016 Common name Nine-spotted Lady Beetle Scientific name Coccinella novemnotata Status Endangered Reason for designation This species was once common and broadly distributed through southern Canada, from Vancouver Island through the prairies to southern Québec.
    [Show full text]
  • Coccinella Transversalis Fabricius on Different Aphid Species
    1. Bioi. Control, 17(1): 35-41, 2003 Comparative prey consumption and searching efficiency of Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus and Coccinella transversalis Fabricius on different aphid species OMKAR and SHEFALISRIVASTAVA Department of Zoology, University ofLucknow Lucknow 226007. Utter Pradesh, India E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The comparative prey consumption and searching efficiency of fourth instar gruhs of Coccinella septempllnctata Linnaeus and Coccinella transversalis Fabricius against three aphid species, viz. Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch), Myzus persicae (Sulzer) and Macrosiphmn rosae (Linnaeus) were evaluated to assess the efficiency of these predators in aphid biocontroI. The larvae of C. septempunctata consumed maximum number (245.60±1.92) of M. persicae at prey density of 800 and minimum (18.S0±0.88) of R. maidis at prey density of 25 in 24 hours. Fourth instar of C. transversalis consumed maximum number (224.80±1.93) of M. persicae at the prey density of 800 and minimum number (17.40±0.58) of M. rosae at the prey density of 25 in 24 hours. Area of discovery of C. septempunctata and C. transversalis was maximum at the lowest predator (1) and prey-densities (25) of M. persicae. The same was minimum in the case of C. septempunctata and C. transversalis at highest predator (8) and prey- densities (800) of R. maidis and M. rosae, respectively. Prey consumption hy hoth coccinellids increased but their searching efficiency decreased with increase of either prey or predator density. The predatory potential and searching efficiency of C. septempunctata was relatively higher than that of C. transversalis. KEY WORDS: Aphids, Coccil/ella septempullctata, Coccinella transversalis, functional response, numerical response, searching efficiency Aphids are economically important insects Coccinella transversalis Fabricius are locally causing severe damage to a number of crop plants.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Biodiversity of Ladybirds (Coccinellidae) at the Black Sea Coast of the Russian Caucasus in the Last 120 Years—
    insects Article History of the Biodiversity of Ladybirds (Coccinellidae) at the Black Sea Coast of the Russian Caucasus in the Last 120 Years—Does the Landscape Transformation and Establishment of Harmonia axyridis Have an Impact? Andrzej O. Bie ´nkowskiand Marina J. Orlova-Bienkowskaja * A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 October 2020; Accepted: 21 November 2020; Published: 23 November 2020 Simple Summary: Studies of the history of regional insect fauna are important for understanding the changes in ecosystems and are therefore crucial for conservation decisions. The harlequin ladybird is a global invader that causes the decline of native ladybirds in some countries. Therefore, it is advisable to monitor the ladybird fauna in regions recently occupied by this species. We analyzed the dynamics of the fauna at the main sea resort of Russia over a period of 120 years to determine the following: (1) how the ladybird biodiversity changed during the intensive landscape transformation; (2) what alien species introduced for pest control have occurred to date; and (3) what the impact is of the harlequin ladybird on the ladybird fauna. We examined specimens collected by us and 54 other collectors including specimens from old museum collections and reconstructed the history of the biodiversity like a picture from puzzle pieces. Surprisingly, landscape transformation did not cause a decrease but rather an increase in ladybird biodiversity; most of the species recorded before 1930 have occurred to date, and 23 other species have spread to the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Assessment for Nine-Spotted Lady Beetle
    Species Status Assessment Class: Insecta Family: Coccinellidae Scientific Name: Coccinella novemnotata Common Name: ninespotted lady beetle Species synopsis: Coccinella novemnotata is a small, oval-shaped insect that ranges from 4.7 to 7 mm. The head is broad with a pale spot between the eyes. Key characteristics for identifying C. novemnotata (also known as C-9) include a large ventral pale trapezoidal spot that extends posteriorly as far as the dorsal spot. The elytra have black spots that get smaller in size and in number until the scutellar spot. Typically, there are a total of nine spots, but the number can vary. Sexes are similar. C-9 is typically found in open landscapes, especially agricultural land. Aphids are a preferred food. Historically, this species’ range included the Nearctic Region of the United States and southern Canada. It was once considered the most common lady beetle in New York and was named the state insect in 1989. Populations have sharply declined since the 1980s and the species has not been found in the Northeast with the exception of a small population at a farm in Suffolk County, New York (Cornell University 2013). 1 I. Status a. Current and Legal Protected Status i. Federal ____ None_______________________________Candidate? _____No____ ii. New York ____None____________________________________________________________ b. Natural Heritage Program Rank i. Global _______G2____________________________________________________________ ii. New York _______not ranked_____ Tracked by NYNHP? __no_(but planning on it)________ Other Rank: Status Discussion: II. Abundance and Distribution Trends a. North America i. Abundance ___x__ declining _____increasing ______stable _____unknown ii. Distribution: __x___ declining _____increasing ______stable _____unknown Time frame considered: ____1987-present_____________________________________________ 2 b.
    [Show full text]
  • Convergent Lady Beetle (Hippodamia Convergens) Ric Bessin  Identified by the Converg- Ing White Lines on the Top of Their Thorax
    How to Identify Lady Beetles and Why to Conserve Them DS-E-011 Dr. Jonathan L. Larson, Nebraska Extension 8015 W. Center Rd. Omaha, NE 68124 Lady beetles, also known as lady bugs or ladybird beetles, are some of the most vicious predators in your yard. As both an adult and as a larva these insects are a valua- ble ally in the landscape, helping to keep pests in check. In particular lady beetles help to control popula- tions of aphids. Some estimates say that one lady beetle larvae will consume 400 aphids and one adult about 5,000. Lady beetles will also consume other pests like the Colorado potato beetle, mealybugs, and scale insects. Basically, anything smaller than they are! Here in Nebraska there are several species of la- dybug that can be found. How to identify which species is which All lady beetles are members of a family called Coccinellidae. By and large this group features adult beetles that are half an inch or less in size, with domed backs that give the beetle a characteristic “humped” appearance. They also are quite colorful, coming in reds, blacks, and oranges and may have stripes or spots. These bright colors tell other predators that lady beetles are toxic to consume. Lady bee- tles perform reflexive bleeding, where a yellow fluid will leak out from them and it stinks and tastes terri- ble. A bird or other insect predator will experience this once and then forever associate those bright colors with terrible tastes and will avoid eating lady beetles in the future.
    [Show full text]