DOCSLIB.ORG

JOINT ESCAP-OSJD(Organization for Cooperation Between Railways) VIRTUAL MEETING

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JOINT ESCAP-OSJD(Organization for Cooperation Between Railways) VIRTUAL MEETING THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS MYANMA RAILWAYS JOINT ESCAP-OSJD(Organization for Cooperation between Railways) VIRTUAL MEETING 7th to 8th July 2020 Myanmar Content ❑Myanma Railways Facts about ❑Important Railway Lines for International Links ❑Projects Highlighted related to the SKRL network ❖Yangon-Mandalay Railway Improvement Project ❖Feasibility Study of Muse – Mandalay Railway Line ❖Dawei-Htee kee railway line project ❖Rehabilitation Plan on Bago-Dewei existing SKRL Alignment ❑Conclusion 2 Myanma Railways’ fact about Myanma Railways Network on MyitKyina 31st August 2019 Divided into 11 divisions Kalay Lashio Employment strength – 19466 Single Route 5405.285 km Mandalay Double Route 705.196 km Total Route Length 6110.481 km Pyay Total Track Length 7942.372 km Bridges 12103 Nos Yangon Tunnels 12 Nos Railway Stations 960 Nos Dawei 1000 mm gauge (Narrow gauge) Important Railway Lines for International links Existing lines Mandalay-Yangon = 617 km Mandalay-Lashio = 313 km Mandalay-Kalay = 539 km Bago-Dawei = 516 km Missing lines to neighboring countries Kalay-Tamu (to India) = 127.4 km Lashio-Rueli (to China) = 131 km Thanbyuzayat-Three Pagoda Pass = 120 km (Thailand) Dawei- Htikhi (to Thailand) = 142 km Total (378 km)/ (400km) ❖ At present, there is no inter-railway line connecting to neighboring countries. Railway routes involved in Singapore-Kunmning Rail Link in Myanmar ▪ Htee Kee-Dawei- missing link 142 km ▪ Dawei-Ye-Mawlamyine-Bago 520 km ▪ Bago-Mandalay 560 km ▪ Mandalay- Myitkyina 457 km ▪ Mandalay-Lashio 280 km ▪ Lashio-Muse missing link 131 km ▪ Thaton-phaan-Myawaddy- Mesok? Projects Highlighted related to the SKRL network Yangon-Mandalay Railway Improvement Project Scope of Works ▪ Civil & Track Works, Bridge work, Installation of new signaling system, Procurement of Modernized DEMU, Establishment of Workshop and depot, etc. Phase 1 (Yangon - Taungoo) ▪ Conducted for F/S on Sep,2014 and Detail Design Mandalay Studied completed on June,2016 ▪ Estimated Cost JPY (91.179) Billion (As DD Report) ▪ Signed Consultancy Services Agreement on Dec, 2016 Phase II ▪ Invited the Contractors by dividing 8 Packages on 353Km March, 2017 – some packages already selected the Nay Pyi Taw contactors – Construction works start in schedule. ▪ Construction Period – 2018 to 2023 (6 Years) Taungoo Phase I Phase II (Taungoo- Mandalay) 267 Km ▪ Conducted for F/S on Oct,2017 and Detail DD Study Yangon started on April, 2018 and completed Sep,2019 ▪ Estimated Cost JPY (191.069) Billion (As DD Report) ▪ Signed Consultancy Services Agreement ▪ Contract Packages are under progress. ▪ Construction Period - 2019 to 2025 (6 Years) 7 Mandalay-Myitkyina Railway Line Upgrading Project by Korea EDCF ❖ The Mandalay-Myithyina line, - since 1898. ❖ Since 2017, MR has been conducting maintenance works- replacement of welded rail, refilling of ballast for better fitness of infrastructure. Myitkyina ❖ In hilly region, two bottle neck of Gyohtaung-Maeza section and Mawhan- Kadu section. These two sections have sharp curve and steep slope Moenyin ❖ Current travel time on Mandalay-Myitkyina Railway is about 19 hours for running along the 550 km distance. KawLin ❖ So MR proposed to the Korea EXIM bank to get EDCF Loan for upgrading the technical failure of these two sections. ❖ By the approval of Korea EXIM bank, Yooshin Engineering Corporation Mandalay conducted the Feasibility study of Gyohtaung-Maeza section in 2016. In 2017, Dong Myeong Engineering Consortium conducted Feasibility study of Mawhan-Kadu section. ❖ Now under evaluation of Detail Design. Status of the Project ▪ 547.4 Km Long, Single lane, Meter gauge Track ▪ High gradients and Curves on some portion, Divided into 3 priority sections rd ▪ Mandalay - KawLin, Section - I ( 3 Priority ) st ▪ KawLin - Moenyin, Section - II ( 1 priority ) nd ▪ Moenyin - Myitkyina, Section - III ( 2 priority ) Activities to upgrade ▪ First priority portion of section II(about 42 Km) by Korea EDCF Loan USD 125 Million. ▪ F/S has been done by Technical Assistance of Korean EXIM Bank on June, 2018 ▪ Under Loan Negotiation process to implement the project ❖Furthermore, remaining sections will follow to proceed by Korea EDCF Loan USD 700 Million on 2020-2021. Mandalay - Muse New Railway Line Project India China Muse Lashio Mandalay Thailand ▪ MR and CREEC signed MoU on 22nd October, 2018. and FS work is going on. ▪ CREEC shall submit F/S Report within (12) months after signed MOU. ▪ Route Length-431 Km ▪ Standard Gauge, Electrified and Speed 160Km ▪ If the project is feasible, Project Implementation stage will be proceed. 9 Dawei-Htee kee railway line project Tha Laot Tar Nabule Thit Ka Don Dawei Deep Sea Port Ye Boub Nyaungdon Kose Chaung Phu Nam Ron to Kachanaburi 80 km Yephyu Maungmagan Myita Ai One Sinbyudaing Dawei Deep Sea Port to Phu Nam Ron 170 km Dawei In 2015, Thailand has already done the F/S including Myanmar side (Dawei-Hteekee) Kachanaburi 1. Design speed Thi Tha ▪ Passenger train Vmax 120 km/h. (Future 160) Phu Nam Ron ▪ Freight train Vmax 80 km/h. (Future 100) 2. Track Gauge 1000 mm (Meter Gauge) Kachanaburi to Bangkok 110 km 3. Axle load 20 ton 4. Civil structure Double track 5. Distance 142 km 6. Estimate Cost USD 2.6 billion This new railway line project’s Possibility is depend on the Dawei Deep Seaport and Dewei Economic Zone’s Development Initiative 10 Rehabilitation Plan on Bago-Dewei existing SKRL Alignment ❖ Bago-Malawlyine (209 km) ➢ Track and Bridge rehabilitation works almost finish – increase speed and safety, ➢ arrange to use the external assistant (loan) for signalling system ❖ Mawlamyine –Ye (148 km) ➢ Passenger train service exist ➢ Considering as priority ones ❖ Ye- Dawei(162 km) ➢ Passenger train service exist ➢ Suffers natural disasters every year ➢ Need to consider for new railway alignment Conclusion ❑ Implementing the upgrading projects of Main Railway Corridors ( a part of SKRL network) by External Assistance (Loan, Grant and Technical Assistance) ❑ interesting in developing of the new railway links heading to neighbouring countries (China, Thailand and India) ❑ Effort to rehabilitate the existing railway network in own capacity – against so many difficulties. ❑ Seeking for the International assistance in the necessitation of Feasibility Study works, Human Resource Development and modernization/ harmonization of Railway Systems Thank You 13.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rail Infrastructure Development Plan and Planning for International Railway Connectivity in Myanmar
    THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS MYANMA RAILWAYS Expert Group Meeting on the Use of New Technologies for Facilitation of International Railway Transport 9-12 December, 2019 Rail Infrastructure Development Plan and Planning for International Railway Connectivity in Myanmar Ba Myint Managing Director Myanma Railways Ministry of Transport and Communications MYANMAR Contents . Brief Introduction on situation of Transport Infrastructure in Myanmar . Formulation of National Transport Master Plan . Preparation for the National Logistics Master Plan Study (MYL‐Plan) . Status of Myanma Railways and Current Rail Infrastructure Development Projects . Planning for International Railway Connectivity in Myanmar 2 Brief Introduction on situation of Transport Infrastructure in Myanmar Myanma’s Profile . Population – 54.283 Million(March,2018) India . Area ‐676,578 Km² China . Coastal Line ‐ 2800 km . Road Length ‐ approximately 150,000 km . Railways Route Length ‐ 6110.5 Km . GDP per Capita – 1285 USD in 2018 Current Status Lao . Myanmar’s Transport system lags behind ASEAN . 60% of highways and rail lines in poor condition Thailand . 20 million People without basic road access . $45‐60 Billion investments needs (2016‐ 2030) Reduce transport costs by 30% Raise GDP by 13% Provide basic road access to 10 million people and save People’s lives on the roads. 4 Notable Geographical Feature of MYANMAR India China Bangaladesh Lao Thailand . As land ‐ bridge between South Asia and Southeast Asia as well as with China . Steep and long mountain ranges hamper the development of transport links with neighbors. 5 Notable Geographical Feature China 1,340 Mil. India 1,210 mil. Situated at a cross‐road of 3 large economic centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Response Situation Report 3 | 1 May 2020
    IOM MYANMAR COVID-19 RESPONSE SITUATION REPORT 3 | 1 MAY 2020 2,500 migrant per day to be allowed to return through the Myawaddy-Mae Sot border gate 16,324 migrants registered online in preparation to return through the Myawaddy-Mae Sot border gate 3,125 international migrants returned to Kachin State mainly from the People’s Republic of China Migrants preparing to return to their communities of origin following 21 days of quarantine at Myawaddy, Kayin State. © IOM 2020 SITUATION OVERVIEW The border with Thailand was expected to re-open on 1 May of China and through the Lweje border gate, according to data to allow a second large influx of migrants (estimated 20,000 from the Kachin State Government (695 internal migrants also to 50,000 returns). The Myanmar Government requested to returned from other states and regions of Myanmar). the Thai Government to only allow 2,500 returnees per day Returnees are being transported to Myitkyina, and from there, through the Myawaddy border gate; however, due to the to their communities of origin where they will stay in extension of the Emergency Decree in Thailand until 31 May, community-based facility quarantine centres. returns are delayed for a few more days to allow for the necessary arrangements to be put in place by Thai authorities. Government Ministries and Departments, the State Government, UN agencies and other actors supporting the COVID-19 response are closely observing the situation in order to quickly respond to potential large scale returns in the coming days. It is expected that approximately 2,000 returning migrants will be quarantined in Myawaddy, while the remainder will be transported from the border to their home communities for community-based quarantine.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Cooperation Case Study of Cambodia-Vietnam Border Point
    Cross-border Cooperation Case Study of Cambodia-Vietnam Border Point The 3rd Global Roundtable on Infrastructure Governance and Tools 24 May 2019 Seoul Kazumasa Sanui J I C A Chief Advisor Project for Improving Logistics System of Cambodia Cross-border Cooperation Contents Case Study of Cambodia-Vietnam Border Point 1. Characteristics of cross-border cooperation * 2. Introduction of the project 3. Preparation for the project 4. Critical challenges and lessons learned for cross-border cooperation * * Here, this presentation tries to extract common factors from the case study. Japan International Cooperation Agency 1 1. Characteristics of cross-border cooperation Cross-border cooperation projects commonly… • Have many stakeholders. • Require lengthy coordination process. • Are affected by state-state power balance. • Are unlikely to solve only by the countries concerned. • Are sometimes controversial, even though having reached agreement by countries concerned. Japan International Cooperation Agency 2 2. Introduction of the project OVERALL GOAL To strengthen connectivity between Cambodia and Vietnam through Southern Economic Corridor OBJECTIVE To reduce time and improve reliability for border-crossing at Bavet – Moc Bai TARGET COUNTRY Cambodia and Vietnam PERIOD 2018 – (preparatory stage) MODALITY Technical assistance, Loan (TBC) BACKGROUND AGREEMENTS Cross-border Transport Agreement in Greater Mekong Subregion, Bilateral agreements, MOU for expressway Japan International Cooperation Agency 3 Southern Economic Corridor (SEC) Features of
    [Show full text]
  • Mimu875v01 120626 3W Livelihoods South East
    Myanmar Information Management Unit 3W South East of Myanmar Livelihoods Border and Country Based Organizations Presence by Township Budalin Thantlang 94°23'EKani Wetlet 96°4'E Kyaukme 97°45'E 99°26'E 101°7'E Ayadaw Madaya Pangsang Hakha Nawnghkio Mongyai Yinmabin Hsipaw Tangyan Gangaw SAGAING Monywa Sagaing Mandalay Myinmu Pale .! Pyinoolwin Mongyang Madupi Salingyi .! Matman CHINA Ngazun Sagaing Tilin 1 Tada-U 1 1 2 Monghsu Mongkhet CHIN Myaing Yesagyo Kyaukse Myingyan 1 Mongkaung Kyethi Mongla Mindat Pauk Natogyi Lawksawk Kengtung Myittha Pakokku 1 1 Hopong Mongping Taungtha 1 2 Mongyawng Saw Wundwin Loilen Laihka Ü Nyaung-U Kunhing Seikphyu Mahlaing Ywangan Kanpetlet 1 21°6'N Paletwa 4 21°6'N MANDALAY 1 1 Monghpyak Kyaukpadaung Taunggyi Nansang Meiktila Thazi Pindaya SHAN (EAST) Chauk .! Salin 4 Mongnai Pyawbwe 2 Tachileik Minbya Sidoktaya Kalaw 2 Natmauk Yenangyaung 4 Taunggyi SHAN (SOUTH) Monghsat Yamethin Pwintbyu Nyaungshwe Magway Pinlaung 4 Mawkmai Myothit 1 Mongpan 3 .! Nay Pyi Hsihseng 1 Minbu Taw-Tatkon 3 Mongton Myebon Langkho Ngape Magway 3 Nay Pyi Taw LAOS Ann MAGWAY Taungdwingyi [(!Nay Pyi Taw- Loikaw Minhla Nay Pyi Pyinmana 3 .! 3 3 Sinbaungwe Taw-Lewe Shadaw Pekon 3 3 Loikaw 2 RAKHINE Thayet Demoso Mindon Aunglan 19°25'N Yedashe 1 KAYAH 19°25'N 4 Thandaunggyi Hpruso 2 Ramree Kamma 2 3 Toungup Paukkhaung Taungoo Bawlakhe Pyay Htantabin 2 Oktwin Hpasawng Paungde 1 Mese Padaung Thegon Nattalin BAGOPhyu (EAST) BAGO (WEST) 3 Zigon Thandwe Kyangin Kyaukkyi Okpho Kyauktaga Hpapun 1 Myanaung Shwegyin 5 Minhla Ingapu 3 Gwa Letpadan
    [Show full text]
  • Military Brotherhood Between Thailand and Myanmar: from Ruling to Governing the Borderlands
    1 Military Brotherhood between Thailand and Myanmar: From Ruling to Governing the Borderlands Naruemon Thabchumphon, Carl Middleton, Zaw Aung, Surada Chundasutathanakul, and Fransiskus Adrian Tarmedi1, 2 Paper presented at the 4th Conference of the Asian Borderlands Research Network conference “Activated Borders: Re-openings, Ruptures and Relationships”, 8-10 December 2014 Southeast Asia Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong 1. Introduction Signaling a new phase of cooperation between Thailand and Myanmar, on 9 October 2014, Thailand’s new Prime Minister, General Prayuth Chan-o-cha took a two-day trip to Myanmar where he met with high-ranked officials in the capital Nay Pi Taw, including President Thein Sein. That this was Prime Minister Prayuth’s first overseas visit since becoming Prime Minister underscored the significance of Thailand’s relationship with Myanmar. During their meeting, Prime Minister Prayuth and President Thein Sein agreed to better regulate border areas and deepen their cooperation on border related issues, including on illicit drugs, formal and illegal migrant labor, including how to more efficiently regulate labor and make Myanmar migrant registration processes more efficient in Thailand, human trafficking, and plans to develop economic zones along border areas – for example, in Mae 3 Sot district of Tak province - to boost trade, investment and create jobs in the areas . With a stated goal of facilitating border trade, 3 pairs of adjacent provinces were named as “sister provinces” under Memorandums of Understanding between Myanmar and Thailand signed by the respective Provincial governors during the trip.4 Sharing more than 2000 kilometer of border, both leaders reportedly understood these issues as “partnership matters for security and development” (Bangkok Post, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Logistics
    MYANMAR TRADE FACILITATION THROUGH LOGISTCS CONNECTIVITY HLA HLA YEE BITEC , BANGKOK 4.9.15 [email protected] Total land area 677,000sq km Total length (South to North) 2,100km (East to West) 925km Total land boundaries 5,867km China 2,185km Lao 235km Thailand 1,800km Bangladesh 193km India 1,463km Total length of coastline 2,228km Capital : Naypyitaw Language :Myanmar MYANMAR IN 2015 REFORM & FAST ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS SIGNIFICANT POTENTIAL CREDIBILITY AMONG ASEAN NATIONS GATE WAY “ CHINA & INDIA & ASEAN” MAXIMIZING MULTIMODALTRANSPORT LINKAGES EXPEND GMS ECONOMIC TRANSPORT CORRIDORS EFFECTIVE EXTENSION INTO MYANMAR INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTION TRADE AND LOTISGICS SUPPLY CHAIN TRANSPARENCY & PREDICTABILITY LEGAL & REGULATORY FREAMEWORK INFRASTUCTURE INFORMATION CORRUPTION FIANACIAL SERVICE “STRENGTHEING SME LOGISTICS” INDUSTRIAL ZONE DEVELOPMENT 7 NEW IZ KYAUk PHYU Yadanarbon(MDY) SEZ Tart Kon (NPD) Nan oon Pa han 18 Myawadi Three pagoda Existing IZ Pon nar island Yangon(4) Mandalay Meikthilar Myingyan Yenangyaing THI LA WAR Pakokku SEZ Monywa Pyay Pathein DAWEI Myangmya SEZ Hinthada Mawlamyaing Myeik Taunggyi Kalay INDUSTRIES CATEGORIES Competitive Industries Potential Industries Basic Industries Food and Beverages Automobile Parts Agricultural Machinery Garment & Textile Industrial Materials Agricultural Fertilizer Household Woodwork Minerals & Crude Oil Machinery & spare parts Gems & Jewelry Pharmaceutical Electrical & Electronics Construction Materials Paper & Publishing Renewable Energy Household products TRANSPORT
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Arrests List
    ƒ ARRESTS No. Name Sex Position Date of Arrest Section of Law Plaintiff Current Condition Address Remark Myanmar Military Seizes Power and Senior NLD S: 8 of the Export and Superintendent Kyi 1 (Daw) Aung San Suu Kyi F State Counsellor (Chairman of NLD) 1-Feb-21 House Arrest Nay Pyi Taw leaders including Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and Import Law Lin of Special Branch President U Win Myint were detained. The NLD’s S: 25 of the Natural Myanmar Military Seizes Power and Senior NLD Superintendent Myint 2 (U) Win Myint M President (Vice Chairman-1 of NLD) 1-Feb-21 Disaster Management House Arrest Nay Pyi Taw leaders including Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and Naing law President U Win Myint were detained. The NLD’s Myanmar Military Seizes Power and Senior NLD 3 (U) Henry Van Thio M Vice President 1-Feb-21 House Arrest Nay Pyi Taw leaders including Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and President U Win Myint were detained. The NLD’s Speaker of the Amyotha Hluttaw, the Myanmar Military Seizes Power and Senior NLD 4 (U) Mann Win Khaing Than M upper house of the Myanmar 1-Feb-21 House Arrest Nay Pyi Taw leaders including Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and parliament President U Win Myint were detained. The NLD’s Speaker of the Union Assembly, the Myanmar Military Seizes Power and Senior NLD 5 (U) T Khun Myat M Joint House and Pyithu Hluttaw, the 1-Feb-21 House Arrest Nay Pyi Taw leaders including Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and lower house of the Myanmar President U Win Myint were detained.
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar: the Key Link Between
    ADBI Working Paper Series Myanmar: The Key Link between South Asia and Southeast Asia Hector Florento and Maria Isabela Corpuz No. 506 December 2014 Asian Development Bank Institute Hector Florento and Maria Isabela Corpuz are consultants at the Office of Regional Economic Integration, Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. Working papers are subject to formal revision and correction before they are finalized and considered published. In this paper, “$” refers to US dollars. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each working paper (given in the citation below). Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. Suggested citation: Florento, H., and M. I. Corpuz. 2014. Myanmar: The Key Link between South Asia and Southeast Asia. ADBI Working Paper 506. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: http://www.adbi.org/working- paper/2014/12/12/6517.myanmar.key.link.south.southeast.asia/ Please contact the authors for information about this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Progress Report
    About the Greater Mekong Subregion Economic Cooperation Program The Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) is made up of Cambodia, the People’s Republic of China (PRC, specifically Yunnan Province and Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region), the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR), Myanmar, Thailand, and Viet Nam. In 1992, with assistance from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and building on their shared histories and cultures, the six countries of the GMS launched a program of subregional economic cooperation—the GMS Program—to enhance their economic relations, initially covering the nine priority sectors: agriculture, energy, environment, human resource development, investment, telecommunications, tourism, transport infrastructure, and transport and trade facilitation. Regional Investment Framework Implementation Plan: Second Progress Report AS OF 31 DECEMBER 2015 GMS Secretariat Southeast Asia Department Asian Development Bank Fax: +63 2 636 2226 E-mail: [email protected] Web address: http://www.adb.org/countries/gms/main Regional Investment Framework Implementation Plan: Second Progress Report As of 31 December 2015 © 2016 Asian Development Bank How to reach us: GMS Secretariat Southeast Asia Department Asian Development Bank Fax: +63 2 636 2226 E-mail: [email protected] Web address: http://www.adb.org/countries/gms/main to download report: http://www.adb.org/countries/gms/strategy Contents I. Introduction. 1 II. Summary of Progress ............................................................................ 2 III. Proposed Amendments to the RIF-IP List ........................................................ 4 IV. Sector Reports. 5 Sample Table 1: Myanmar: Transport Sector - Investment as of 30-Jun-2015: Project Description .............. 19 Table 2: Myanmar: Transport Sector - Investment as of 30-Jun-2015: Project Progress ................. 20 Tables Table 1: Summary - Investment Projects by Sector Number of projects as of 31 December 2015 .....
    [Show full text]
  • CADP 2.0) Infrastructure for Connectivity and Innovation
    The Comprehensive Asia Development Plan 2.0 (CADP 2.0) Infrastructure for Connectivity and Innovation November 2015 Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia, its Governing Board, Academic Advisory Council, or the institutions and governments they represent. All rights reserved. Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted with proper acknowledgement. Cover Art by Artmosphere ERIA Research Project Report 2014, No.4 National Library of Indonesia Cataloguing in Publication Data ISBN: 978-602-8660-88-4 Contents Acknowledgement iv List of Tables vi List of Figures and Graphics viii Executive Summary x Chapter 1 Development Strategies and CADP 2.0 1 Chapter 2 Infrastructure for Connectivity and Innovation: The 7 Conceptual Framework Chapter 3 The Quality of Infrastructure and Infrastructure 31 Projects Chapter 4 The Assessment of Industrialisation and Urbanisation 41 Chapter 5 Assessment of Soft and Hard Infrastructure 67 Development Chapter 6 Three Tiers of Soft and Hard Infrastructure 83 Development Chapter 7 Quantitative Assessment on Hard/Soft Infrastructure 117 Development: The Geographical Simulation Analysis for CADP 2.0 Appendix 1 List of Prospective Projects 151 Appendix 2 Non-Tariff Barriers in IDE/ERIA-GSM 183 References 185 iii Acknowledgements The original version of the Comprehensive Asia Development Plan (CADP) presents a grand spatial design of economic infrastructure and industrial placement in ASEAN and East Asia. Since the submission of such first version of the CADP to the East Asia Summit in 2010, ASEAN and East Asia have made significant achievements in developing hard infrastructure, enhancing connectivity, and participating in international production networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Ongoing Conflict in Three Pagodas Area and Recommendations for Civilian Protection
    Ongoing conflict in Three Pagodas area and recommendations for civilian protection On November 8th a day after Burma’s election, fighting erupted between DKBA Brigade 5 and Burmese army forces in the border town of Myawaddy, adjacent to the Thai town of Mae Sot. The next morning at around 10:45 am, DKBA forces south of Myawaddy based in Three Pagodas Pass (TPP), previously serving as units of a government administered border guard force (BGF), engaged Burmese army Light Infantry Battalions (LIB) No. 284 and No. 405. This unexpected eruption of violence sent thousands of residents fleeing from the densely populated town of TPP across official, and later unofficial, border crossings to Thailand. The following points compiled by the Human Rights Foundation of Monland (HURFOM) detail the impact of this fighting on local civilian communities, the protection situation that has resulted, indications that fighting will continue or increase, and recommendations that would best implement humanitarian protection goals for current and future refuges in the TPP area. Opening Conflict based Thai side who were border named Hoak Pan not able to return to their Rai (“6000 Rai Plantation” • Fighting began on homes to help their 6000 rai is approximately November 9th at 10:45 am families. 2,308 acres). Refugees and lasted until November • According to a New Mon crossed into this 10th in and around Three State Party (NMSP) official plantation and took shelter Pagodas Pass town. from the TPP area, there because they could • In these first three days refugees initially fled from not cross at the TPP fighting occurred between TPP Burma side, and Palai Thai/Burmese checkpoint Burmese Light Infantry Japan, Goboun, Tom Tha of Nam Pakeit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Situation in Karen State After the Elections PAPER No
    EBO ANALYSIS The Situation in Karen State after the Elections PAPER No. 1 2011 THE SITUATION IN KAREN STATE AFTER THE ELECTIONS EBO Analysis Paper No. 1/2011 For over sixty years the Karens have been fighting the longest civil war in recent history. The struggle, which has seen demands for an autonomous state changed to equal recognition within a federal union, has been bloody and characterized by a number of splits within the movement. While all splinter groups ostensibly split to further ethnic Karen aspirations; recent decisions by some to join the Burmese government’s Border Guard Force (BGF) is seen as an end to such aspirations. Although a number of Karen political parties were formed to contest the November elections, the likelihood of such parties seriously securing appropriate ethnic representation without regime capitulation is doubtful. While some have argued, perhaps correctly, that the only legitimate option was to contest the elections, the closeness of some Karen representatives to the current regime can only prolong the status quo. This papers examines the problems currently affecting Karen State after the 7 November elections. THE BORDER GUARD FORCE Despite original promises of being allowed to recruit a total of 9,000 troops, the actual number of the DKBA (Democratic Karen Buddhist Army) or Karen Border Guard Force has been reduced considerably. In fact, a number of the original offers made to the DKBA have been revoked. At a 7 May 2010 meeting held at Myaing Gyi Ngu, DKBA Chairman U Tha Htoo Kyaw stated that ‘According to the SE Commander, the BGF will retain the DKBA badge.’ In fact the DKBA were given uniforms with SPDC military patches and all Karen flags in DKBA areas were removed and replaced by the national flag.
    [Show full text]