October 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

October 2020 NAPS 2020 Presidential Candidate Questionnaire page 8 October 2020 page 29 October 2020, Volume 111, No. 10 In This Issue October 2020 The Postal Supervisor (ISSN 0032-5384) is printed monthly, with a combined September/October issue, by the National Association of Postal Su- FEATURES pervisors (NAPS), 1727 King St., Suite 400, Alexandria, VA 22314-2753; 703-836-9660; fax, 8 NAPS 2020 Presidential Candidate Questionnaire 703-836-9665; website, www.naps.org; general e-mail, [email protected]. ©2020 NAPS provided its questionnaire to the two major presidential candidates. Periodicals postage paid at Alexandria, VA, and additional mailing offices. 12 July Consultative Verbal instructions from USPS leadership, NAPS members receive The Postal Supervisor conducting route inspections while driving and making route inspection as part of their membership dues. Members not position permanent among items discussed. receiving the publica- tion on a regular basis 24 Legislative Report Card See how your House member voted on should notify their two postal bills. branch secretaries. Non- member subscription www.naps.org price: $25 per year. Objective RESIDENT OFFICERS Submissions— Articles submitted for The objective of the Asso- 3 A USPS Balancing Act—Business vs. Service publication should ciation shall be to pro- Brian J. Wagner promote the welfare of mote, through appropriate NAPS and its members 4 in accordance with and effective action, the A History of Challenge in Serving Ivan D. Butts Article II of the NAPS welfare of its members, 5 Yes, Congress, We Are Essential—and Always Have Constitution & Bylaws. and to cooperate with the Been! Chuck Mulidore The NAPS resident offi- USPS and other agencies cers reserve the right to edit all articles, as well of the federal government as decline to publish in a continuing effort to COLUMNS submitted material. improve the service, to Branch officer articles raise the standard of 29 Legislative Update Bob Levi must be not more than efficiency, and to widen 350 words. Send all arti- 38 The NAPS Postmaster Joe Bodary cles to NAPS Secretary/ the field of opportunity Treasurer Chuck Muli- for its members who make dore at naps.cm@naps. the Postal Service or the org. DEPARTMENTS Reprint requests federal government their and other correspon- life work. 16 NAPS of Note dence may be ad- dressed to Karen Young; phone/fax, 540-636- 22 Views from the Vice Presidents Tommy Roma and Myrna 2569; [email protected]. Pashinski High-resolution photos may be e-mailed to [email protected]. Please include 23 Thrift Savings Plan August 2020 your non-USPS e-mail. NAPS neither assumes responsibility for the contents of the articles 31 67th National Convention Registration Form published herein, nor does it necessarily agree Registration closes July 24, 2021; hotel room block expires Aug. 4 with the opinions expressed. Moreover, opin- ions expressed by an author do not necessarily 32 reflect the opinions of the author’s branch. Best Website and Newsletter Contests Deadline for entries is June 30, 2021 Advertising—Advertising inquiries should be directed to Karen Young; phone/fax, 540- 33 2021 NAPS Golf Tournament 636-2569; [email protected]. The publication of any advertising herein 34 2020 SPAC Contributors does not necessarily constitute NAPS endorse- ment of the products or services offered. 35 SPAC Scoreboard Postmaster—Please send address labels, clipped from undeliverable copies, along with 37 Thoughts from the NAPS Branches Dioenis D. Perez USPS Form 3579, to The Postal Supervisor, 1727 King St., Suite 400, Alexandria, VA 22314-2753. 39 Notes from the National Auxiliary Beverly Austin Commentary from the Resident Officers A USPS Balancing Act— Business vs. Service he U.S. Postal Service’s total revenue in Fiscal and concerns about the timely delivery of mail-in bal- Year 2019 was $71.2 billion— enough to place it lots for the November election have caused angst 43rd on the Fortune 500 if it were a private com- among various postal stakeholders regarding the USPS’ T pany. So, the USPS is big business. In reality, how current service performance. Such news can negatively should the Postal Service be viewed—as a business or a impact the long-standing trust the American public has public service? How should it be managed—for profit or had for the Postal Service and, more importantly, nega- not for profit? Here’s the scoop. tively impact the agency’s revenue stream with cus- In the simplest terms, the Post Office Department tomers switching to USPS competitors. was first established by Congress NAPS fully supports a viable, highly trusted, effi- under the U.S. Constitution. With cient and cost-effective Postal Service whose focus is the passage of the 1970 “Postal Re- serving the American public. As a postal stakeholder, organization Act,” the U.S Postal NAPS is ready, willing and able to provide Postmaster Service was established as a self-suf- General Louis DeJoy and his leadership team with input ficient government agency to serve and assistance to achieve the agency’s goal of opera- the American public without tax- tional efficiency, financial stability and the highest level payer funding. Today’s Postal Ser- of trust and service to the American public. vice could be viewed as a business, Furthermore, NAPS supports postal legislation that but a public-service business with a keeps this same, high level of trust and service. We en- Brian J. Wagner universal service obligation to bind courage legislation that addresses the impact COVID-19 President the nation together. has had on USPS finances, operations and the safety It’s no surprise the Postal Service and security of postal employees. NAPS will continue to is considered one of the most consistently popular and seek passage of long-overdue postal reform legislation trusted entities among federal agencies. In April 2020, that includes major components such as repealing the the Pew Research Center reported that 91% of the prefunding of future retiree health benefits, fair and American public approved of the USPS. flexible postage rates, incentives to develop innovative In general, a business is owned by an individual, products and services and protecting the Postal Service’s partners or shareholders, with a goal of profitability to universal service obligation. maximize the value for its shareholders. However, there This past June, I had a meet-and-greet Zoom meet- are no owners or shareholders of the Postal Service. There ing with incoming PMG DeJoy, where he stated the are stakeholders, with a vested interest to maximize the USPS can’t provide service at all cost. That is under- intrinsic value of mail delivery to the American public. standable, as no business can give away the shop if it So, who exactly are these stakeholders? According wants to be financially successful. But it can’t be at the to the executive summary in the Postal Service’s cost of service levels to the American public. “FY2020-2024 Five-Year Strategic Plan,” stakeholders in- I agree with DeJoy’s Aug. 7 USPS Newsbreak state- clude the president, Congress, the American people, ment: “It is crucial that we do what is within our con- postal employees, business partners and, of course, cus- trol to help us successfully complete our mission to tomers. When NAPS and our members hear U.S. Postal serve the American people and, through the universal Service, we hear service. service obligation, bind our nation together by main- However, recent news stories about mail delays, taining and operating our unique, vital and resilient in- postal processing machines taken out of service, man- frastructure.” dates to reduce overtime, changes in post office hours Continued on page 10 The Postal Supervisor / October 2020 3 A History of Challenge in Serving s we enter the month of October in a national the USPS for a percent- election year, some in this heavily partisan era age of its ground mail The Postal Supervisor are waiting with bated breath for the October delivery. The USPS pays 2020 Production Schedule A “surprise” that could sway an election from $1.5 billion annually to Copy victory to defeat. Unfortunately, the postal version of move letters and parcels Issue Deadline* Mails this surprise has happened much earlier. via FedEx air cargo NOV SEPT 28 OCT 22 As I have stated in past articles, we have faced pro- planes. FedEx spent al- DEC OCT 23 NOV 17 ponents who have advocated for most $10.5 million on JAN 21 NOV 23 DEC 22 the privatization of America’s lobbying in 2019. FEB JAN 4 JAN 28 Postal Service since the enactment Pitney Bowes has *Copy must be received by this day; see of H.R. 17070 (91st), “An Act to 11,000 workers world- page 2 for submission information. improve and modernize the postal wide. Its 2019 revenue service, to reorganize the Post Of- was $3.2 billion. It paid for a “White Paper” in 2013 fice Department, and for other pur- that recommended privatizing postal trucking, retail poses.” The Postal Reorganization and mail processing. In 2002, Pitney Bowes became Act of 1970 passed by Congress the largest U.S. presorted mail network. Pitney Bowes abolished the then-United States would vastly increase its profits if those recommenda- Ivan D. Butts Post Office Department. Until that tions bore fruit. Pitney Bowes contributed over $1 mil- Executive Vice President time, the Post Office Department lion to lobby Congress in 2019. was part of the cabinet. These aren’t the only companies that would benefit In its place, the United States Postal Service was from postal privatization. On Aug. 12, CNN reported created as a corporation-like, independent agency with that PMG Louis DeJoy continues to hold a multimil- an official monopoly on the delivery of mail in the lion-dollar stake in his former company XPO Logistics, United States.
Recommended publications
  • The Magazine of San Diego State University Summer 2016
    The Magazine of San Diego State University Summer 2016 SS ELE IM T FROM THE The Magazine of San Diego State University (ISSN 1543-7116) is published by SDSU Marketing & Communications and distributed to members PRESIDENT of the SDSU Alumni Association, faculty, staff and friends. Editor: Coleen L. Geraghty Editorial Contributors: Michael Price, Tobin Vaughn Art Director: Lori Padelford ’83 Graphic Design: John Signer ’82 SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY Elliot Hirshman President DIVISION OF UNIVERSITY RELATIONS & DEVELOPMENT Mary Ruth Carleton Vice President University Relations and Development Leslie Levinson ’90 Chief Financial Officer The Campanile Foundation Greg Block ’95 Chief Communications Officer Leslie Schibsted Associate Vice President Development Amy Harmon Associate Vice President Development Jim Herrick Photo: Lauren Radack Assistant Vice President Special Projects Chris Lindmark Universities have a timeless and enduring next generation of researchers and may also Assistant Vice President Campaign, Presidential and Special Events character. At the same time, they are engines give us insights into human health today. In of change that move our society forward. addition, we take a look at efforts in Forest We welcome mail from our readers. 360 Magazine The summer issue of 360 demonstrates Rohwer’s lab to understand viruses — one Marketing & Communications how these qualities work together to make of Earth’s oldest organisms. This research is 5500 Campanile Drive San Diego CA 92182-8080 today’s university a wellspring for the ideas providing tantalizing clues that may help E-mail: [email protected] and innovations that improve everyday life us solve some of today’s health and Read 360 Magazine online at and solve our most pressing challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • USPS Admin. Appeal
    August 4, 2020 BY EMAIL: [email protected] General Counsel United States Postal Service 475 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20260 Re: Appeal of FOIA Request No. 2020-FPRO-01322 Dear General Counsel: Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (“CREW”) hereby appeals the initial determination by the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) on a portion of CREW’s request under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) for records concerning voting by mail in the upcoming presidential election and the replacement of the Postmaster General. As set forth below, the USPS failed to conduct a search reasonably designed to uncover all responsive documents, as evidenced by the limited number of responsive records USPS claims to have uncovered. Further, the USPS improperly relied on FOIA Exemption 5 to withhold nearly the entire contents of the disclosed records. On June 16, 2020, CREW submitted to the Postal Service by email a FOIA request for ten categories of records. First, CREW requested copies of any and all briefing materials and or documents created by USPS employees prepared for or presented to Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General of the United States, referring or relating to voting by mail (“item 1”). Second, CREW requested any and all briefing materials and or documents created by USPS employees prepared for or presented to Postmaster General of the United States Megan Brennan referring or relating to voting by mail (“item 2”). Third, CREW requested any and all briefing materials or documents, including testimony, or responses to questions for the record, created by USPS employees prepared for or presented to any United States Senator, member of the United States House of Representatives, or congressional staff, referring or relating to voting by mail (“item 3”).
    [Show full text]
  • U:\OK to Print 117Th\43780.TXT
    LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS TO PUT THE POSTAL SERVICE ON SUSTAINABLE FINANCIAL FOOTING HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION FEBRUARY 24, 2021 Serial No. 117–4 Printed for the use of the Committee on Oversight and Reform ( Available on: govinfo.gov, oversight.house.gov or docs.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 43–780 PDF WASHINGTON : 2021 COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York, Chairwoman ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of JAMES COMER, Kentucky, Ranking Minority Columbia Member STEPHEN F. LYNCH, Massachusetts JIM JORDAN, Ohio JIM COOPER, Tennessee PAUL A. GOSAR, Arizona GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia VIRGINIA FOXX, North Carolina RAJA KRISHNAMOORTHI, Illinois JODY B. HICE, Georgia JAMIE RASKIN, Maryland GLENN GROTHMAN, Wisconsin RO KHANNA, California MICHAEL CLOUD, Texas KWEISI MFUME, Maryland BOB GIBBS, Ohio ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ, New York CLAY HIGGINS, Louisiana RASHIDA TLAIB, Michigan RALPH NORMAN, South Carolina KATIE PORTER, California PETE SESSIONS, Texas CORI BUSH, Missouri FRED KELLER, Pennsylvania DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois ANDY BIGGS, Arizona DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Florida ANDREW CLYDE, Georgia PETER WELCH, Vermont NANCY MACE, South Carolina HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., Georgia SCOTT FRANKLIN, Florida JOHN P. SARBANES, Maryland JAKE LATURNER, Kansas JACKIE SPEIER, California PAT FALLON, Texas ROBIN L. KELLY, Illinois YVETTE HERRELL, New Mexico BRENDA L. LAWRENCE, Michigan BYRON DONALDS, Florida MARK DESAULNIER, California JIMMY GOMEZ, California AYANNA PRESSLEY, Massachusetts VACANCY DAVID RAPALLO, Staff Director MARK STEPHENSON, Director of Legislation ETHAN VANNESS, Professional Staff ELISA LANIER, Chief Clerk CONTACT NUMBER: 202-225-5051 MARK MARIN, Minority Staff Director (II) CONTENTS Page Hearing held on February 24, 2021 ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Drawing the Intersections of Exhibition, Media, Performance and Architecture Lawrence Paul Wallen University of Wollongong
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2012 A grammar of space - drawing the intersections of exhibition, media, performance and architecture Lawrence Paul Wallen University of Wollongong Recommended Citation Wallen, Lawrence Paul, A grammar of space - drawing the intersections of exhibition, media, performance and architecture, Doctor of Creative Arts thesis, Faculty of Creative Arts, University of Wollongong, 2012. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3689 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Faculty of Creative Arts A GRAMMAR OF SPACE Drawing the Intersections of Exhibition, Media, Performance and Architecture Lawrence Paul Wallen Bachelor of Architecture (1st Class Honours) RMIT Master of Architecture (Research) RMIT This thesis is presented as part of the requirements for the Award of the Degree of Doctor of Creative Arts of the University of Wollongong March 2012 i ABSTRACT ‘A Grammar of Space’ refers to the search for the first memory of space, and to the construction of a framework that explains artistic approaches to space, through the process of reflecting on a spatial practice. The research asks what is the interstitial space between image and text? It is this junction, potent in contemporary practice, that I argue underpins my artistic research. This is both an artistic and scholarly investigation, and it engages with my search for the origin of (cultural) memory as manifested in works from a range of media: architecture, installation, scenography, drawing, and time-based media. The study is distinctive in its exploration of a contemporary global trajectory as it traces geographic, psychological and cultural landscapes as it revisits central works created in Europe, Australia, Asia and New Zealand since 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for 2006–2007 (PDF)
    ANNUAL REPORT 2006-2007 Board of Directors Mission The Buffalo Fine Arts Academy The Albright-Knox Art Gallery, one of the nation’s oldest Mrs. John T. Elfvin, Honorary Member of the Executive Committee public arts organizations, has a clear and compelling mission to Charles E. Balbach acquire, exhibit, and preserve both modern and contemporary Charles W. Banta, President Steven G. Biltekoff art. It focuses especially on contemporary art, with an active Robert J. Bojdak commitment to taking a global and multidisciplinary approach Donald K. Boswell to the presentation, interpretation, and collection of the artistic Robert T. Brady Catherine B. Foley, Secretary expressions of our times. In an enriching, dynamic, and vibrant Sally Gioia environment that embraces diverse cultures and traditions, the Robert M. Greene Gallery seeks to serve a broad and far-reaching audience. L.N. Hopkins, M.D. Peter F. Hunt Thomas R. Hyde, Vice-President Vision Roberta Joseph, Vice-President It is the commitment of the Albright-Knox Art Gallery to be one Alison R. Keane Northrup R. Knox, Jr. of the world’s best and most dynamic modern and contemporary Seymour H. Knox IV art institutions. Jordan A. Levy Brian J. Lipke It will be recognized locally as a vital and energetic cultural Gerald S. Lippes gathering place and as an indispensable educational resource for Judith C. Lipsey Annmarie L. Maxwell the community. Katherine McDonagh Mark R. Mendell Through its outstanding programs, creative collaborations, and an Margery Nobel extraordinary new addition that will address pressing space issues Frederic P. Norton and important programming initiatives, the Gallery will attract Alphonso O’Neil-White Frederick G.
    [Show full text]
  • Reef Fish Fishing Under the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan (RFFMP) and Proposed Amendment 23
    _______________________________________________________ Endangered Species Act - Section 7 Consultation Biological Opinion Action Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Southeast Regional Office (SERO), Sustainable Fisheries Division (F/SER2). Activity: The Continued Authorization of Reef Fish Fishing under the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan (RFFMP) and Proposed Amendment 23. Consulting Agency: NO NMFS, SERO, Protected Resources Division (F/SER3). Approved by: ‘ RofE. Crabtree, Ph.D., Regional Administrator. Date Issued: I / Contents: 1.0 Consultation History 2 2.0 Description of the Proposed Action 4 3.0 Status of the Species 21 4.0 Environmental Baseline 45 5.0 Effects of the Proposed Action 54 6.0 Cumulative Effects 86 7.0 Jeopardy Analysis 87 8.0 Conclusion 93 9.0 Incidental Take Statement 93 10.0 Conservation Recommendations 96 11.0 Reinitiation Statement 97 12.0 Literature Cited 98 Introduction Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq.), requires each federal agency to ensure any action they authorize, fund, or carry out is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered or threatened species or to result in the destruction or adverse modification of any designated critical habitat of such species. When the action of a federal agency may affect a species protected under the ESA, that agency is required to consult with either the NMFS or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, depending on the protected species that may be affected. Formal consultations on most listed marine species are conducted between the action agency and NMFS.
    [Show full text]
  • Theone Hundred Twenty-Eighth
    The One Hundred Twenty-Eighth COMMENCEMENT saturday, may 19 THE ALMA MATER Sons of Elon, daughters too, Bring their praise and homage true. The one hundred twenty-EIGHth commencement In thy keeping there will be Words and deeds to honor thee. Prelude Hearken to the song they’re singing, “Suite of Dances,” André Campra And the loyalty they’re bringing. Alma Mater, they will cherish thee; *Processional Alma Mater, they will cherish thee. “Pomp and Circumstance March No. 1,” Edward Elgar Proud, the oak trees on thy hill Academic Procession Offer shade and shadow still The Elon Flags The University Mace Green the fields around thee lie; The Student Marshals Blue the Carolina sky. The Candidates for Degrees Stately rise thy halls of learning, The University Gonfalons Toward their portals we are turning. The Faculty Marshals Alma Mater, we will cherish thee; The University Trustees Alma Mater, we will cherish thee. The University Faculty The Platform Party Elon, ever lead us on Invocation To a bright and happy dawn; The Reverend Janet F. Fuller Teach us still to love and pray, University Chaplain Guide us to a nobler day. Joyous music lies before us, *National Anthem Memories to swell the chorus. “The Star Spangled Banner,” Francis Scott Key Led by Grant Paylor ’18 Alma Mater, we will cherish thee; Alma Mater, we will cherish thee. Welcome Kerrii Brown Anderson ’79 Chair, Board of Trustees Tune: “Gaudeamus Igitur” Message of Appreciation Lyrics: William David Ellis Robert N. Minton President, Class of 2018 Introduction of the Speaker Connie Ledoux Book President 3 Address CANDIDATES FOR THE BACHELOR OF ARTS DEGREE “Ship’s Companions” Leo M.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter Template
    Copyright by José Adrián Barragán-Álvarez 2013 The Dissertation Committee for José Adrián Barragán-Álvarez Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The Feet of Commerce: Mule-trains and Transportation in Eighteenth Century New Spain Committee: Susan Deans-Smith, Supervisor Matthew Butler Virginia Garrard-Burnett William B. Taylor Ann Twinam The Feet of Commerce: Mule-trains and Transportation in Eighteenth Century New Spain by José Adrián Barragán-Álvarez, B.A., M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2013 Para mamá y papá, por haber dedicado su vida entera para darme esta oportunidad. Que Dios los bendiga, siempre. Acknowledgements In the course of completing this dissertation, I was blessed with the generosity of various institutions and the friendship of many individuals who believed in me and helped me reach this goal. For this, I am forever indebted to them. I would like to thank first the members of my dissertation committee: Dr. Susan Deans-Smith, Dr. William Taylor, Dr. Ann Twinam, Dr. Virginia Garrard-Burnett and Dr. Matthew Butler. Dr. Deans-Smith and Dr. Taylor have helped me more than I can thank them for –they pressed my thinking and believed in my project even when I had all but abandoned it. Without their mentorship, their careful readings of the dissertation, and their invaluable advice throughout the years, I would be lost. Dr. Garrard-Burnett’s unwavering confidence in me helped me believe in myself.
    [Show full text]
  • Exposheilahicks SHEILA HICKS LIFELINES 7 FEBRUARY - 30 APRIL 2018
    COMMUNICATION AND PARTNERSHIPS DEPARTMENT PRESS KIT SHEILA HICKS LIFELINES 7 FEBRUARY - 30 APRIL 2018 SHEILA HICKS #ExpoSheilaHicks SHEILA HICKS LIFELINES 7 FEBRUARY - 30 APRIL 2018 5 janvier 2018 CURATOR OF THE EXHIBITION MICHEL GAUTHIER, curator at musée national d’art moderne, communication contemporary collections department and partnerships department 75191 Paris cedex 04 ASSISTED BY MATHILDE MARCHAND director assistant curator at musée national d’art moderne, Benoît Parayre contemporary collections department telephone 00 33 (0)1 44 78 12 87 PRESS VISIT email [email protected] MARDI 6 FEBRUARY 2018 11AM - 1PM press officer 11.15AM: Presentation of the exhibition by Michel Gauthier Dorothée Mireux telephone 00 33 (0)1 44 78 46 60 email [email protected] CONTENTS assisted by Solène Dupuis telephone 00 33 (0)1 44 78 12 49 email 1. PRESS RELEASE PAGE 3 [email protected] 2. AROUND THE EXHIBITION PAGE 4 www.centrepompidou.fr 3. PUBLICATION PAGE 5 4. CHRONOLOGY PAGE 11 5. EXHIBITION MAP AND LIST OF EXHIBITED WORKS PAGE 16 6. PRESS VISUALS PAGE 24 7. PRACTICAL INFORMATION PAGE 30 #ExpoSheilaHicks 14 november 2017 PRESS RELEASE communication and partnerships department SHEILA HICKS 75191 Paris cedex 04 director LIGNES DE VIE [LIFE LINES] Benoît Parayre telephone 00 33 (0)1 44 78 12 87 7 FEBRUARY- 30 APRIL 2018 email GALERIE 3, LEVEL 1 [email protected] press officer The Centre Pompidou is to devote a solo exhibition to Sheila Hicks, an American artist based Dorothée Mireux in Paris since the mid-1960s. Looking back at Hicks’ career from 1957 to the present day, telephone 145 works will be displayed in Galerie 3, overlooking the city of Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 Table of Cases (References Are to Pages.) 1 Tudor City Place
    Table of Cases (References are to pages.) 1 Tudor City Place Assocs. v. 2 Tudor City Tenants Corp. ................................................. 1-15 III Lounge, Inc. v. Gaines ........................ 15-13, 15-34, 15-42, 15-43 3M Distrib. Corp. v. Rugby Corp. ................... 2-3, 19-1, 20-8, 30-14 7-Eleven, Inc. v. Stin, LLC ......................................................... 15-99 10 Suf Realty, Inc. v. Fins ............................................................ 11-8 10th & 5th, Inc. v. Arrowsmith .............................................. 16-118 11 W. 42d St., Inc. v. Yardstick, Inc. ......................................... 33-12 12 Broadway Realty, LLC v. Levites ......................................... 10-118 12 Havemeyer Place Co., LLC v. Allan S. Gordon .................... 27-20 12-14 E. 46th St. Corp. v. Kohnstamm-Wolfe, Inc. ................... 33-10 16 Cobalt LLC v. Harrison Career Inst. .........................16-57, 16-58 18th Ave. Pharmacy, Inc. v. Wilmant Realty Corp. ..................... 3-25 20 W. 76th St., LLC v. Div. of Hous. & Cmty. Renewal, In the Matter of ............... 7-18 20/20 Vision Ctr., Inc. v. Hudgens .................................34-33, 34-34 20th Century Lites, Inc. v. Goodman ........................................ 27-35 21 Merchs. Row Corp. v. Merchs. Row, Inc. ......................7-39, 7-60 23 Tracts of Land v. United States ............................................ 13-20 25th Realty Assocs. v. Griggs .................................................... 16-17 27th St. Assocs. v. Lehrer ............................................................ 35-9 28 Mott St. Co. v. Summit Import Corp. ................................. 30-17 29 W. 25th St. Parking Corp. v. Penn Post Parking, Inc. ........................................ 4-8, 7-24, 7-60 30 E. Main St. Serv. Station, Inc. v. H&D All Type Auto Repair, Inc. ......................................... 14-64 30-88 Steinway St., Inc. v. H.C. Bohack Co. .............................. 6-81 31 W.
    [Show full text]
  • CLAN September-October 2020
    National Association of Letter Carriers Non-Profit Org. Joseph P. Considine Branch 34 NALC, AFL-CIO U.S. Postage 400 West Cummings Park, Suite 3950 PAID Woburn, MA 01801-6396 Boston, MA Permit No. 54631 Address Service Requested 208 BOSTON, MA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS The Award-Winning Newspaper of Joseph P. Considine Branch 34 NALC, AFL-CIO Volume XLIX, Number 4 September-October 2020 Please check out BRANCH 34’s CLAN the dates, times and locations for all CELEBRATING 130 YEARS OF UNION PARTICIPATION AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS H 1890-2020 upcoming Membership Meetings on the President’s Report BRANCH 34 WEBSITE at Not Out of the Woods Yet! nalcbranch34.com et’s start out with some good news! All corrective measures being taken after a Any mail sorted Lroute inspections have been cancelled positive in a particular station. after this time is for the month of September and there is a Management has the opportunity to the next days mail good possibility that the entire Fall schedule get a jump on this Crisis, but they are not and sell any late could follow. COVID-19 is not beneficial taking the appropriate actions. After five priority packages GERALD (Jerry) McCARTHY to route inspections. I’m really hoping that people are put out in a station as a result for overtime or a President Upcoming Meetings Upcoming we return to a sense of normalcy soon and of the Coronavirus it is too late for those CCA with a late one event to help put this back on track is employees, but you can prevent the future start of say 10 AM.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Postmasters General Dates Prior to 1900 Are the Dates the Postmasters General Were Appointed Or Commissioned; Dates After 1900 Are the Dates They Took Office
    List of Postmasters General Dates prior to 1900 are the dates the Postmasters General were appointed or commissioned; dates after 1900 are the dates they took office. Appointments by the U.S. President were made with the advice and consent of the Senate. Postmaster General Date Appointed by the Continental Congress Benjamin Franklin July 26, 1775 Richard Bache November 7, 1776 Ebenezer Hazard January 28, 1782 Postmaster General Date Appointed by President . Samuel Osgood September 26, 1789 George Washington Timothy Pickering August 12, 1791 George Washington Joseph Habersham February 25, 1795 George Washington Gideon Granger November 28, 1801 Thomas Jefferson Return J. Meigs, Jr. March 17, 1814 James Madison John McLean June 26, 1823 James Monroe William T. Barry March 9, 1829 Andrew Jackson Amos Kendall May 1, 1835 Andrew Jackson John M. Niles May 19, 1840 Martin Van Buren Francis Granger March 6, 1841 William Henry Harrison Charles A. Wickliffe September 13, 1841 John Tyler Cave Johnson March 6, 1845 James K. Polk Jacob Collamer March 8, 1849 Zachary Taylor Nathan Kelsey Hall July 23, 1850 Millard Filmore Samuel D. Hubbard August 31, 1852 Millard Filmore James Campbell March 7, 1853 Franklin Pierce Aaron V. Brown March 6, 1857 James Buchanan Joseph Holt March 14, 1859 James Buchanan Horatio King February 12, 1861 James Buchanan Montgomery Blair March 5, 1861 Abraham Lincoln William Dennison September 24, 1864 Abraham Lincoln Alexander W. Randall July 25, 1866 Andrew Johnson John A. J. Creswell March 5, 1869 Ulysses Grant James W. Marshall July 3, 1874 Ulysses Grant Marshall Jewell August 24, 1874 Ulysses Grant James N.
    [Show full text]