South Korea and the US

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

South Korea and the US Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies 2013 | Volume 24 Editor-in-Chief: Gilbert Rozman, Princeton University KEI Editorial Board KEI Editors: Abraham Kim, Nicholas Hamisevicz Contract Editor: Gimga Group Design: Gimga Group The Korea Economic Institute of America is registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act as an agent of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, a public corporation established by the Government of the Repubic of Korea. This material is filed with the Department of Justice, where the required registration statement is available for public inspection. Registration does not indicate U.S. government approval of the contents of this document. KEI is not engaged in the practice of law, does not render legal services, and is not a lobbying organization. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. While this monograph is part of the overall program of the Korea Economic Institute of America endorsed by its Officers, Board of Direc- tors, and Advisory Council, its contents do not necessarily reflect the views of individual members of the Board or of the Advisory Council. Copyright © 2013 Korea Economic Institute of America www.keia.org Printed in the United States of America. ISSN 2167-3462 Contents KEI Board of Directors ...........................................................................................................................i KEI Advisory Council.............................................................................................................................ii Preface.................................................................................................................................................iv Bilateral Competition and Cooperation Under New Leadership Introduction...................................................................................................................................................2 The United States and China Robert Sutter.................................................................................................................................................7 China and Russia Sergey Radchenko.......................................................................................................................................23 South Korea and Japan Cheol Hee Park..........................................................................................................................................39 South Korea and the U.S. Scott Snyder................................................................................................................................................51 China’s National Identity and the Sino-U.S. National Identity Gap: Views from Four Countries Introduction.................................................................................................................................................66 The Debate Inside China William Callahan........................................................................................................................................69 The View from Japan Ming Wan....................................................................................................................................................83 The View from South Korea See-Won Byun..............................................................................................................................................97 The View from Russia Gilbert Rozman.........................................................................................................................................113 CJK Economic Trilateralism: The Prospects and Perils of a New FTA Introduction...............................................................................................................................................130 The Chinese Perspective Scott Harold..............................................................................................................................................135 The South Korean Perspective Chang Jae Lee...........................................................................................................................................149 The Japanese Perspective T. J. Pempel...............................................................................................................................................167 The U.S. Perspective Claude Barfield.........................................................................................................................................183 Prospects and Challenges for Korean Reunification Introduction...............................................................................................................................................200 Competing Regional Interests and Reunification John Park..................................................................................................................................................203 South Korea’s Unification Policy and Prospects Ho-Yeol Yoo...............................................................................................................................................209 Understanding Peaceful Reunification: Its Dynamics and Challenges Abraham Kim............................................................................................................................................215 Contributors.........................................................................................................................................233 About the Korea Economic Institute....................................................................................................240 i | Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies KEI Board of Directors Sukhan Kim, Esq. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld Dr. Yoon-shik Park George Washington University Prof. David Steinberg Georgetown University Dr. Won-ho Kim Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Officers The Honorable Donald Manzullo President & CEO Dr. Abraham Kim Vice President | ii KEI Advisory Council Chair The Honorable Stephen W. Bosworth The Fletcher School at Tufts University Mr. Bradley Babson His Excellency Tae-sik Lee World Affairs Council of Maine Former Ambassador to the U.S. Dr. Claude Barfield Dr. Young-Sun Lee American Enterprise Institute Yonsei University Dr. John Bennett Dr. Wonhyuk Lim Former KEI President Korea Development Institute Dr. Thomas F. Cargill Mr. Paul M. McGonagle University of Nevada, Reno Consultant His Excellency Yoon-je Cho The Honorable Mark C. Minton Sogang University The Korea Society Dr. Nicholas Eberstadt Dr. G. Mustafa Mohatarem American Enterprise Institute General Motors Corporation Mr. Robert Fallon Dr. Chung-in Moon Columbia Business School Yonsei University Mr. Gordon Flake Dr. Hugh T. Patrick Maureen & Mike Mansfield Foundation Columbia University The Honorable Thomas C. Hubbard The Honorable Ernest H. Preeg The Korea Society/McLarty Associates Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI The Honorable James A. Kelly Dr. Mitchell B. Reiss EAP Associates, Inc. Washington College Mr. Andrew B. Kim Mr. Alan Romberg Sit/Kim International Henry L. Stimson Center Mr. Spencer Kim Dr. Jeffrey R. Shafer CBOL Corporation JR Shafer Insights Mr. Bruce Klingner His Excellency Joun-yung Sun Heritage Foundation Kyungnam University The Honorable James T. Laney Mr. W. Robert Warne Emory University Former KEI President Dr. Kirk W. Larsen Mr. Joseph A.B. Winder Brigham Young University Winder International/Former KEI President iii | Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies | iv Preface For over twenty years, the Korea Economic Institute of America (KEI) invited leading Korea and Asia scholars and experts from around the world to its annual academic symposium. Starting in 2012, KEI embarked on a new initiative to revamp this series by partnering with the Association of Asian Studies (AAS) to incorporate the symposium into the AAS annual conference. To this end, KEI organized four conference panels, advertised KEI’s outreach work to over 3,000 conference participants at AAS, and raised the profile of the Institute on a global stage. As before, KEI edited, compiled and published the research papers presented by the distinguished speakers at the symposium as part of its Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies series. Part of this new endeavor is the involvement of Dr. Gilbert Rozman, the Musgrave Professor of Sociology at Princeton University. As the Editor-in-Chief for this Joint U.S.- Korea Academic Studies volume, his knowledge and work with the authors is visible throughout this publication. Dr. Rozman also helped KEI organize four timely and topical panels at the AAS conference. His involvement is part of KEI’s constant effort to bring our subscribers high quality and informative resources on issues impacting the U.S.-Republic of Korea relationship. The events and actions in Northeast Asia continue to have important implications for the future of the region. Many of these interactions have both bilateral and multilateral effects, which our authors examine in four themes. The rise of the Asia-Pacific region is characterized by both an increase in cooperation and competition among countries, and our experts look at this dynamic through key bilateral relationships. Moreover, economics has been a vital driver of cooperation in Asia, and this volume examines this continuing trend with the development of the China-Japan-Korea trilateral relationship and the possibility of a free trade agreement among the three countries. We have a section that further analyzes
Recommended publications
  • Korea's Mistake on China's ADIZ Controversy
    Korea’s Mistake on China’s ADIZ Controversy By Dr. Victor Cha December 2, 2013 Victor Cha is a senior adviser and the inaugural holder of the Korea Chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. He is also director of Asian studies and holds the D.S. Song-KF Chair in the Department of Government and School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. From 2004 to 2007, he served as director for Asian affairs at the White House on the National Security Council (NSC), where he was responsible primarily for Japan, the Korean peninsula, Australia/New Zealand, and Pacific Island nation affairs. Dr. Cha was also the deputy head of delegation for the United States at the Six-Party Talks in Beijing and received two Outstanding Service Commendations during his tenure at the NSC. He is the award-winning author of Alignment Despite Antagonism: The United States- Korea-Japan Security Triangle (Stanford University Press, 1999), winner of the 2000 Ohira Book Prize; Nuclear North Korea: A Debate on Engagement Strategies, with Dave Kang (Columbia University Press, 2004); Beyond the Final Score: The Politics of Sport in Asia (Columbia University Press, 2009); and The Impossible State: North Korea, Past and Future (Ecco, 2012. Dr. Cha holds a B.A., an M.I.A., and a Ph.D. from Columbia University, as well as an M.A. from Oxford University. The Republic of Korea appropriately protested China’s November 23 announcement of the creation of the East China Sea Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) through foreign ministry and defense ministry channels last week.
    [Show full text]
  • The East China Sea: North Asian Energy Hub?
    The East China Sea: North Asian Energy Hub? Qingdao Ximeng-Wuxi, 2018 Yellow Sea Basin Pusan Theoretical Median Cheju Do Jiuquan-Jiangsu, 2016 (South Korea) Fukuoka Shaanxi-Jiangsu, 2016 Socotra Rock Jiangsu Wuxi Yacheng Cheju Kagoshima Basin Theoretical Median Japan-South Korea Xiangjiaba-Shanghai, 2010 JDA Jingping-Sunan, 2012 Longjing Pingbei Haijiao China- Pinghu Japan Field Yuquan Joint Development Zone Xihu (2008) Lishui Field Theoretical Median Daiyos/Senkakus Okinawa Conoco- Philips Senkaku/Diaoyutai Islands Tachao Basin Tainam Basin Gaolan Terminal Liwan 3-1 Panyu Panyu 4-1 3-2 Panyu 3-1 1 Bullet Points: By 2050, China, Japan and South Korea could be connected by an East China Sea energy infrastructure. “We need to start building the infrastructure to meet the deadlines that nature will impose on us.” Benefits: Tim Flannery Environmental Author 1. It would raise cross-border energy trade. This would increase Australian Of the Year (2007) efficiency, lower prices and raise supply security.Together, the three represent a huge market. 2. Each country could serve as a source of reserve supply for the other two, given asynchronous energy demand profiles. Northern China’s peak demand is for winter heating. Japan and South Korea’s peak demand is for summer air conditioning. Sharing seasonally- idled capacity benefits all three. 3. Geopolitical benefits would ensue from cooperative infrastructure.- This would reduce the risk of conflict over territorial disputes. 4. Extending infrastructure penetration into the East China Sea would speed development of new energy sources. These could include including wind power, tidal power and ocean thermal energy conversion and solar.
    [Show full text]
  • China As Dystopia: Cultural Imaginings Through Translation Published In: Translation Studies (Taylor and Francis) Doi: 10.1080/1
    China as dystopia: Cultural imaginings through translation Published in: Translation Studies (Taylor and Francis) doi: 10.1080/14781700.2015.1009937 Tong King Lee* School of Chinese, The University of Hong Kong *Email: [email protected] This article explores how China is represented in English translations of contemporary Chinese literature. It seeks to uncover the discourses at work in framing this literature for reception by an Anglophone readership, and to suggest how these discourses dovetail with meta-narratives on China circulating in the West. In addition to asking “what gets translated”, the article is interested in how Chinese authors and their works are positioned, marketed, and commodified in the West through the discursive material that surrounds a translated book. Drawing on English translations of works by Yan Lianke, Ma Jian, Chan Koonchung, Yu Hua, Su Tong, and Mo Yan, the article argues that literary translation is part of a wider programme of Anglophone textual practices that renders China an overdetermined sign pointing to a repressive, dystopic Other. The knowledge structures governing these textual practices circumscribe the ways in which China is imagined and articulated, thereby producing a discursive China. Keywords: translated Chinese literature; censorship; paratext; cultural politics; Yan Lianke Translated Literature, Global Circulations 1 In 2007, Yan Lianke (b.1958), a novelist who had garnered much critical attention in his native China but was relatively unknown in the Anglophone world, made his English debut with the novel Serve the People!, a translation by Julia Lovell of his Wei renmin fuwu (2005). The front cover of the book, published by London’s Constable,1 pictures two Chinese cadets in a kissing posture, against a white background with radiating red stripes.
    [Show full text]
  • Critique of Anthropology
    Critique of Anthropology http://coa.sagepub.com/ The state of irony in China Hans Steinmüller Critique of Anthropology 2011 31: 21 DOI: 10.1177/0308275X10393434 The online version of this article can be found at: http://coa.sagepub.com/content/31/1/21 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Critique of Anthropology can be found at: Email Alerts: http://coa.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://coa.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://coa.sagepub.com/content/31/1/21.refs.html >> Version of Record - Mar 30, 2011 What is This? Downloaded from coa.sagepub.com at NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIV LIB on February 23, 2012 Article Critique of Anthropology 31(1) 21–42 The state of irony ! The Author(s) 2011 Reprints and permissions: in China sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0308275X10393434 coa.sagepub.com Hans Steinmu¨ller Department of Anthropology, London School of Economics Abstract In everyday life, people in China as elsewhere have to confront large-scale incongruities between different representations of history and state. They do so frequently by way of indirection, that is, by taking ironic, cynical or embarrassed positions. Those who understand such indirect expressions based on a shared experiential horizon form what I call a ‘community of complicity’. In examples drawn from everyday politics of memory, the representation of local development programmes and a dystopic novel, I distinguish cynicism and ‘true’ irony as two different ways to form such communities. This distinction proposes a renewed attempt at understanding social inclusion and exclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Politics of China
    The Global Politics of China Instructor: Daniel Large Instructor Contact: [email protected] Department: School of Public Policy, Central European University Number of Credits: 2. Teaching Format: Seminar. Semester: Winter 2019. Course Status: Elective. Office Hours: Tuesday 4-5pm, October 6 u. 7, 2nd floor, Office 241. Course Description This course provides an intensive introduction to the global politics of China. As well as a crucial intellectual challenge today, China is increasingly important for a range of policy engagements. While China has become globally prominent in recent times, this course is not just about current affairs or foreign policy per se. It also explores how China came to be in its current circumstances, and the interconnections between China’s ‘domestic’ and ‘global’ relations. The first part of the course explores the politics of history and China’s modern historical trajectory. Going beyond a unitary conception of the Chinese state, the second part examines the nature and domestic sources of China’s foreign policy before exploring key themes in its global politics. Finally, it analyses China’s changing engagement with and role in global governance. Throughout, it will involve active learning. Learning Goals and Outcomes This course aims to provide an intensive orientation to the changing global politics of China. While providing a structured framework to achieve this, it also seeks to enable individual learning pathways and enhance analytical, writing and verbal skills. By the end of the course, students should be able to: • Understand the historical trajectory behind China’s current world role, and the politics of history; • Understand the interplay between China’s domestic and global politics; • Critically assess and engage debates about China’s (re)emergence and evolving global role; • Undertake further, more indepth study into the global politics of China.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1989 Tiananmen Square Protests in Chinese Fiction and Film
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Making the Censored Public: The 1989 Tiananmen Square Protests in Chinese Fiction and Film A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Comparative Literature by Thomas Chen Chen 2016 © Copyright by Thomas Chen Chen 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Making the Censored Public: The 1989 Tiananmen Square Protests in Chinese Fiction and Film by Thomas Chen Chen Doctor of Philosophy in Comparative Literature University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Kirstie M. McClure, Co-Chair Professor Robert Yee-Sin Chi, Co-Chair Initiated by Beijing college students, the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests—"Tiananmen"— shook all of China with their calls for democratic and social reforms. They were violently repressed by the Chinese state on June 4, 1989. Since then, their memory has been subject within the country to two kinds of censorship. First, a government campaign promulgating the official narrative of Tiananmen, while simultaneously forbidding all others, lasted into 1991. What followed was the surcease of Tiananmen propaganda and an expansion of silencing to nearly all mentions that has persisted to this day. My dissertation examines fiction and film that evoke Tiananmen from within mainland China and Hong Kong. It focuses on materials that are particularly open to a self-reflexive reading, such as literature in which the protagonists are writers and films shot without authorization that in their editing indicate the precarious ii circumstances of their making. These works act out the contestation between the state censorship of Tiananmen-related discourse on the one hand and its alternative imagination on the other, thereby opening up a discursive space, however fragile, for a Chinese audience to reconfigure a historical memory whose physical space is off limits.
    [Show full text]
  • China, South Korea, and the Socotra Rock Dispute a Submerged Rock and Its Destabilizing Potential
    palgrave.com Political Science and International Relations : Asian Politics Fox, Senan China, South Korea, and the Socotra Rock Dispute A Submerged Rock and Its Destabilizing Potential Addresses political, historical and important contemporary strategic implications of the decades-long Socotra Rock dispute Analyses China's assertion of sovereignty in maritime areas Provides food for thought for scholars, think-tank researchers, and policymakers This book exclusively addresses the political, historical and important contemporary strategic implications of the decades-long Socotra Rock dispute between China and South Korea. It is Palgrave Pivot one of several maritime disputes involving China and a smaller state, and for which maritime 1st ed. 2019, XV, 146 p. 5 law offers no apparent remedy. There is little doubt it will continue to be a problem in the 1st illus. future and should no longer be overlooked. The submerged rock, located between mainland edition China and the Korean Peninsula, straddles the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea. As China continues asserting its sovereignty and jurisdiction in maritime areas, this book will provide food for thought for scholars, think-tank researchers, and policymakers. Printed book Hardcover Order online at springer.com/booksellers Printed book Springer Nature Customer Service Center GmbH Hardcover Customer Service ISBN 978-981-13-2076-7 Tiergartenstrasse 15-17 69121 Heidelberg £ 64,99 | CHF 88,50 | 74,99 € | Germany 82,49 € (A) | 80,24 € (D) T: +49 (0)6221 345-4301 Available [email protected] Discount group Palgrave Monograph (P6) Product category Monograph Other renditions Softcover ISBN 978-981-13-2078-1 Prices and other details are subject to change without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Issues in the East and South China Seas
    Maritime Issues in the East and South China Seas Summary of a Conference Held January 12–13, 2016 Volume Editors: Rafiq Dossani, Scott Warren Harold Contributing Authors: Michael S. Chase, Chun-i Chen, Tetsuo Kotani, Cheng-yi Lin, Chunhao Lou, Mira Rapp-Hooper, Yann-huei Song, Joanna Yu Taylor C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/CF358 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2016 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover image: Detailed look at Eastern China and Taiwan (Anton Balazh/Fotolia). Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface Disputes over land features and maritime zones in the East China Sea and South China Sea have been growing in prominence over the past decade and could lead to serious conflict among the claimant countries.
    [Show full text]
  • East Asia Security in Flux: What Regional Order Ahead?”, Études De L’Ifri, Ifri, April 2020
    Études de l’Ifri EAST ASIA SECURITY IN FLUX What Regional Order Ahead? Masashi NISHIHARA and Céline PAJON (eds.) May 2020 Center for Asian Studies Ifri is France’s leading independent center for research, information, and debate on major international issues. Founded in 1979 by Thierry de Montbrial, Ifri is an officially recognized nonprofit organization in France (under the 1901 association law). It is independent of any administrative control, setting its own agenda and publishing its work regularly. Following an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri’s studies and debates bring together political decision makers and internationally renowned experts. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the authors alone. This publication is the result of a collaborative project between the French Institute of International Relations (Ifri) and the Research Institute for Peace and Security (RIPS), Tokyo, Japan. ISBN: 979-10-373-0173-4 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2020 Cover: © Wikimedia Commons ; U.S. Navy/MC3 Chris Cavagnaro ; Inkdrop (via Shutterstock) ; Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan ; Alexandros Michailidis (via Shutterstock) ; Truba7113 (via Shutterstock) ; Frederic Legrand - COMEO (via Shutterstock), Clothilde Goujard How to cite this publication: Masashi Nishihara and Céline Pajon (eds.), “East Asia Security in Flux: What Regional Order Ahead?”, Études de l’Ifri, Ifri, April 2020. Ifri 27 rue de la Procession 75740 Paris Cedex 15 – FRANCE Tél. : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 – Fax : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 E-mail : [email protected] Website : Ifri.org Authors Elena ATANASSOVA-CORNELIS, Senior Lecturer, Antwerp University Emma CHANLETT-AVERY, Research Fellow, US Congressional Research Service, US Patrick CRONIN, Asia-Pacific Security Chair, Hudson Institute Barry DESKER, Distinguished Fellow at the S.
    [Show full text]
  • Importance of Jeju Civilian-Military Port
    Pacific Forum CSIS Honolulu, Hawaii PacNet Number 91 Dec. 18, 2013 Importance of Jeju Civilian-Military Port Additionally, the flotilla from the Jeju port will be in charge of securing SLOCs connecting the ROK with shipping by Sung Chan Kim and Seok-ho Kang lanes to the Middle East and Europe. The ROK’s complete Assemblyman Sung Chan Kim ([email protected]) is a dependence on foreign sources of crude oil, of which 99.8 member of the National Defense Committee of the ROK percent is imported via the SLOC passing through the Ieodo National Assembly with the ruling Saenuri Party and served area and the waters south of Jeju, makes the task of securing as the Chief of Naval Operations from 2010 to 2011. Richard freedom of navigation through the area a critical matter of Seok-ho Kang ([email protected]) is a non-resident Kelly national security. Studies show that a mere 15-day long Fellow with the CSIS. disruption of SLOCs in the area would devastate the ROK economy, which relies heavily on international trade. Seoul’s announcement, 15 days after Beijing declared its own Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ), that it will Despite this critical importance of the Jeju port to the expand Korea’s ADIZ suggests that the Republic of Korea ROK, opponents claim that the port is merely a United States (ROK), the People’s Republic of China (PRC), and Japan have Navy forward base to be used to contain the PRC. Unfounded reached an end to overt diplomatic maneuvers without a clear claims have ranged from the US Department of Defense understanding of how the overlapping zones would be forcing Seoul to build the port to an almost certain expectation enforced.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/28/2021 07:12:07AM Via Free Access 144 Xi Jinping’S Leadership Style
    Asian International Studies Review Vol. 17 No.2 (December 2016): 143-158 143 Received September 7, 2016 Revised November 10, 2016 Accepted December 2, 2016 Xi Jinping’s Leadership Style: Master or Servant? KERRY BROWN* Much commentary has been made about the amount of power that Xi Jinping has accrued since the leadership transition over 2012 and into 2013. He is interpreted by many as being the most powerful of modern Chinese leaders. But his leadership needs to be interpreted carefully within the organisation that he leads and whose interests he and his colleagues serve–the Communist Party of China. Looking at his relationship with this body reveals a more complex framework within which to see his real authority, one which implies that he is as much a servant of its corporate interests as he is an autonomous, self- serving agent. Keywords: Xi Jinping, China, Leadership, Power, Politics, Authority * Professor, King’s College, London, the UK; E-mail: [email protected] DOI: 10.16934/isr.17.2.201612.143 Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 07:12:07AM via free access 144 Xi Jinping’s Leadership Style I. INTRODUCTION From November 2012, when Xi Jinping emerged as the Party Secretary of the Communist Party of China (CPC), he has been talked of as being the most powerful leader the country has had since the era of Deng Xiaoping, who was the paramount leader from 1978 to the 1990s. Some have even claimed his power equals that of regime founder Mao Zedong (Nathan 2016). But it is clear in these discussions that we need to differentiate between two levels of power, or two contexts within which to consider Xi, to make any headway with this question.
    [Show full text]
  • Master´S Thesis 2020 Bc. Denisa Máchová
    Masaryk University Faculty of Arts Department of Chinese Studies Master´s Thesis 2020 Bc. Denisa Máchová Masaryk University Faculty of Arts Department of Chinese Studies Cultural Studies of China Bc. Denisa Máchová The Self – loathing Discourse in the Theme of Modernisation in the Chinese Literature of the 20th Century Master´s Thesis Supervisor: Mgr. et Mgr. Dušan Vávra, Ph.D. 2020 I hereby declare that this thesis is my own work and it contains no other materials written or published by any other person except where due reference is made in the text of the thesis. Brno, May 2020 …..…………………… The thesis was completed within the cooperation framework between the Department of Chinese Studies (Masaryk University) and the Institute of China Studies (Zhejiang University). During my two- semester stay in China, the thesis was supervised by Prof. Jiang Wentao 姜文涛, Associate Professor in School of International Studies at Zhejiang University, China. ABSTRACT This thesis elaborates the self-loathing discourse in the theme of modernization in 20th century Chinese literature. The main question is how the discourse of self-loathing is elaborated in chosen works from the 20th century and how is it evolving during this century. This work is divided into four chapters. The first one contains the definition of self-loathing, the presentation of main historical events of the 20th century and philosophical changes in Chinese society during the 20th century. The second chapter presents the authors, their lives, creation, writing style and general attitude towards modernisation of Chinese society. The third chapter contains the discourse analysis of chosen literature works and presents the concrete examples of discourse of self-loathing, which were found.
    [Show full text]